This service tests the validity of an RSS 2.0 feed, checking to see that it follows the rules of the RSS specification. For advice from the RSS Advisory Board on how to implement RSS and handle issues such as enclosures and HTML encoding, read the RSS Best Practices Profile. This checker is also a validator of Atom and RSS 1.0 feeds.

Use this tester regularly to ensure that your RSS feed continues to work well in the wide audience of RSS readers, podcast clients and other software that supports the format.

 

Congratulations!

[Valid RSS] This is a valid RSS feed.

Recommendations

This feed is valid, but interoperability with the widest range of feed readers could be improved by implementing the following recommendations.

  • line 39, column 100: title should not contain HTML: ' (94 occurrences) [help]

    ... rator to delete a user&#039;s comment]]></title>
                                                 ^

Source: https://community.webcon.com/feed/user-voice

  1. <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
  2. <rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  3.    <channel>
  4.        <atom:link href="https://community.webcon.com/feed/user-voice" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
  5.        <title><![CDATA[User voice - community.webcon.com]]></title>
  6.        <link><![CDATA[https://community.webcon.com/feed/user-voice]]></link>
  7.        <description><![CDATA[]]></description>
  8.        <pubDate>Sun, 20 Apr 2025 22:50:52 +0200</pubDate>
  9.  
  10.                    <item>
  11.                
  12.                <title><![CDATA[Search panel: Option to change the position of Search everywhere]]></title>
  13.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/6956#msg-7068</link>
  14.                <description><![CDATA[Thanks, I wasnt aware that there is such an option. I will suggest it.]]></description>
  15.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Daniel Krüger Cosmo Consult)]]></author>
  16.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/6956#msg-7068</guid>
  17.                <pubDate>Sun, 20 Apr 2025 22:50:52 +0200</pubDate>
  18.                            </item>
  19.                    <item>
  20.                
  21.                <title><![CDATA[Integration in MS Graph and Copilot]]></title>
  22.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/7065#msg-7065</link>
  23.                <description><![CDATA[Hi,we would like to make WEBCON processes available via Copilot agents and to use the knowledge in WEBCON through the MS Graph to use it in Copilot and other Azure Services.It would be great having a WEBCON on-prem graph connector data source for the MS search &amp; intelligence service and Teams apps/agents e.g. like those offered from Atlassian for Confluence and Jira. One use case would be to passthrough a teams chat message to an agent via action in the context menu, parsing the message with AI Prompt to extract data and create JSON, fill out an adaptive card offering data from WEBCON to trigger the wished process and pass all needed data as JSON for the form fields to it. We build prototypes for such scenarios but it would be a greater impact if this would be in your portfolio out of the box and for all customers.What about an integration in the announced MS ESS Agent?https://techcommunity.microsoft.com/blog/microsoft365copilotblog/how-to-prepare-for-a-successful-microsoft-employee-self-service-agent-implementa/4403136Are there any plans on all this? Would be amazing news.Kind RegardsSbastien]]></description>
  24.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Sébastien Anselment)]]></author>
  25.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/7065#msg-7065</guid>
  26.                <pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2025 19:00:41 +0200</pubDate>
  27.                            </item>
  28.                    <item>
  29.                
  30.                <title><![CDATA[Add ability to define keyboard type for choose attributes]]></title>
  31.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/7001#msg-7064</link>
  32.                <description><![CDATA[It makes sense &gt;&gt; straight to the backlog.]]></description>
  33.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Michal Rykiert)]]></author>
  34.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/7001#msg-7064</guid>
  35.                <pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2025 10:57:02 +0200</pubDate>
  36.                            </item>
  37.                    <item>
  38.                
  39.                <title><![CDATA[Possibility for the Administrator to delete a user&#039;s comment]]></title>
  40.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/6989#msg-7063</link>
  41.                <description><![CDATA[Sounds good, we&#039;ll put it under review.]]></description>
  42.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Michal Rykiert)]]></author>
  43.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/6989#msg-7063</guid>
  44.                <pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2025 10:55:15 +0200</pubDate>
  45.                            </item>
  46.                    <item>
  47.                
  48.                <title><![CDATA[Attachment upload: Add description field]]></title>
  49.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/6974#msg-7062</link>
  50.                <description><![CDATA[Sounds good -&gt; straight to the backlog.]]></description>
  51.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Michal Rykiert)]]></author>
  52.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/6974#msg-7062</guid>
  53.                <pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2025 10:53:58 +0200</pubDate>
  54.                            </item>
  55.                    <item>
  56.                
  57.                <title><![CDATA[Process documentation - unable to generate when developer has limited access to the studio]]></title>
  58.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/7060#msg-7060</link>
  59.                <description><![CDATA[Hi,I would like to suggest and ask about the issue of generating process documentation. When an application is shared with a specific developer and the developer only has access to this application, he cannot generate process documentation. He must report to the administrator, who has access to all applications, to generate documentation files.Why in this situation is it not possible to generate process documentation yourself, which you created yourself?I suggest that such a possibility be added to the user who has preview and editing for the dedicated application.]]></description>
  60.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Krzysztof Gaszczyk)]]></author>
  61.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/7060#msg-7060</guid>
  62.                <pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2025 10:32:54 +0200</pubDate>
  63.                            </item>
  64.                    <item>
  65.                
  66.                <title><![CDATA[New Release feed for new versions]]></title>
  67.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/6971#msg-7059</link>
  68.                <description><![CDATA[Working on it! &gt;&gt; backlog]]></description>
  69.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Michal Rykiert)]]></author>
  70.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/6971#msg-7059</guid>
  71.                <pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2025 10:03:59 +0200</pubDate>
  72.                            </item>
  73.                    <item>
  74.                
  75.                <title><![CDATA[Nested comments and like button]]></title>
  76.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/6970#msg-7058</link>
  77.                <description><![CDATA[Since the comment section is a default option, available everywhere, we want to keep it relatively simple. Therefore, as such, the comment section will not be developed in this direction. However, we will consider adding a new field type that would allow for the behavior as you suggested. With that said, I&#039;ll label this thread as &quot;not now&quot;, but keep it&#039;s not the end of the discussion about the functionalities you suggested.]]></description>
  78.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Michal Rykiert)]]></author>
  79.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/6970#msg-7058</guid>
  80.                <pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2025 10:03:12 +0200</pubDate>
  81.                            </item>
  82.                    <item>
  83.                
  84.                <title><![CDATA[Additional option in Active Directory actions - sync mode]]></title>
  85.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/6967#msg-7057</link>
  86.                <description><![CDATA[We&#039;ll put it under consideration :). I&#039;m changing the status accordingly.]]></description>
  87.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Michal Rykiert)]]></author>
  88.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/6967#msg-7057</guid>
  89.                <pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2025 09:59:48 +0200</pubDate>
  90.                            </item>
  91.                    <item>
  92.                
  93.                <title><![CDATA[Option to set link to Designer Desk of dev system]]></title>
  94.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/6966#msg-7056</link>
  95.                <description><![CDATA[That&#039;s an interesting suggestion. We&#039;ll take it under review.]]></description>
  96.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Michal Rykiert)]]></author>
  97.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/6966#msg-7056</guid>
  98.                <pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2025 09:58:53 +0200</pubDate>
  99.                            </item>
  100.                    <item>
  101.                
  102.                <title><![CDATA[General setting to enable or disable (hide) an application]]></title>
  103.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/6963#msg-7055</link>
  104.                <description><![CDATA[While we don&#039;t deny that the suggested option would be useful in some cases, we also see a high risk of confusion it may cause in cases where certain apps are not visible to users due to privileges AND/OR disabled status. With that said, we&#039;re not going to proceed with the implementation at this time.]]></description>
  105.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Michal Rykiert)]]></author>
  106.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/6963#msg-7055</guid>
  107.                <pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2025 09:57:58 +0200</pubDate>
  108.                            </item>
  109.                    <item>
  110.                
  111.                <title><![CDATA[Search panel: Option to change the position of Search everywhere]]></title>
  112.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/6956#msg-7054</link>
  113.                <description><![CDATA[This search panel can be disabled, and after our internal discussion, this would be a suggestion in your case. With that said, let&#039;s see if more people share the same challenge.]]></description>
  114.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Michal Rykiert)]]></author>
  115.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/6956#msg-7054</guid>
  116.                <pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2025 09:53:59 +0200</pubDate>
  117.                            </item>
  118.                    <item>
  119.                
  120.                <title><![CDATA[Attachment preview in a new tab]]></title>
  121.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/6914#msg-7053</link>
  122.                <description><![CDATA[We&#039;ll take it under review. Stay tuned!]]></description>
  123.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Michal Rykiert)]]></author>
  124.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/6914#msg-7053</guid>
  125.                <pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2025 09:52:44 +0200</pubDate>
  126.                            </item>
  127.                    <item>
  128.                
  129.                <title><![CDATA[https://portal.webconbps.com  - Design Studio is not working]]></title>
  130.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/6905#msg-7052</link>
  131.                <description><![CDATA[I&#039;m closing the thread.]]></description>
  132.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Michal Rykiert)]]></author>
  133.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/6905#msg-7052</guid>
  134.                <pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2025 09:51:42 +0200</pubDate>
  135.                            </item>
  136.                    <item>
  137.                
  138.                <title><![CDATA[New form rule to display an attachment]]></title>
  139.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/6843#msg-7051</link>
  140.                <description><![CDATA[It goes straight to the backlog! :)]]></description>
  141.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Michal Rykiert)]]></author>
  142.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/6843#msg-7051</guid>
  143.                <pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2025 09:50:19 +0200</pubDate>
  144.                            </item>
  145.                    <item>
  146.                
  147.                <title><![CDATA[Multiple workflows and forms in Designer Desk project]]></title>
  148.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/7050#msg-7050</link>
  149.                <description><![CDATA[Hi,it would be amazing if Designer Desk would support multiple workflows and forms in projects. Is this already on the roadmap maybe?Kind RegardsSbastien]]></description>
  150.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Sébastien Anselment)]]></author>
  151.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/7050#msg-7050</guid>
  152.                <pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2025 12:13:00 +0200</pubDate>
  153.                            </item>
  154.                    <item>
  155.                
  156.                <title><![CDATA[Expand all application groups in Designer Studio application dropdown]]></title>
  157.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/7044#msg-7049</link>
  158.                <description><![CDATA[Hi Daniel,oh, I missed this little save all button indeed. Thanks!Maybe there could be a &quot;save all&quot; button in the closing prompt that does the same?Kind RegardsSbastien]]></description>
  159.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Sébastien Anselment)]]></author>
  160.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/7044#msg-7049</guid>
  161.                <pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2025 08:16:27 +0200</pubDate>
  162.                            </item>
  163.                    <item>
  164.                
  165.                <title><![CDATA[Expand all application groups in Designer Studio application dropdown]]></title>
  166.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/7044#msg-7048</link>
  167.                <description><![CDATA[Hi Sbastien,there&#039;s a &quot;save all&quot; button in the top left corner. If this is the only use case for the &quot;expand all&quot; feature, I would say, that it&#039;s not needed and would be insufficient. If you changed anything in the data sources / system settings, these wouldn&#039;t be visible in this view.Best regards,Daniel]]></description>
  168.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Daniel Krüger Cosmo Consult)]]></author>
  169.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/7044#msg-7048</guid>
  170.                <pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2025 07:35:11 +0200</pubDate>
  171.                            </item>
  172.                    <item>
  173.                
  174.                <title><![CDATA[Expand all application groups in Designer Studio application dropdown]]></title>
  175.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/7044#msg-7044</link>
  176.                <description><![CDATA[Hi,a function for expanding all application groups in Designer Studio application dropdown would be nice.The main reason is if one works on several apps in several groups it isn&#039;t possible to see which apps still have unsaved changes. Closing Designer Studio gives a warning that some changes aren&#039;t saved and one has to open all application groups to find the apps marked with * and to save them.Another option would be a global &quot;save all changes&quot; buttons in this prompt.Kind RegardsSbastien Anselment]]></description>
  177.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Sébastien Anselment)]]></author>
  178.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/7044#msg-7044</guid>
  179.                <pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2025 17:45:55 +0200</pubDate>
  180.                            </item>
  181.                    <item>
  182.                
  183.                <title><![CDATA[DOCUMENT TEMPLATE WITH QR CODE]]></title>
  184.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4684#msg-7004</link>
  185.                <description><![CDATA[Hi Katarzyna, were you able to solve the problem with the qr code with hyperlink? I have a similar case where I want to generate a qr code with hyperlink in action and put it in a .pdf file.]]></description>
  186.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Marcin Stachera - Marcopol)]]></author>
  187.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4684#msg-7004</guid>
  188.                <pubDate>Tue, 08 Apr 2025 22:55:00 +0200</pubDate>
  189.                            </item>
  190.                    <item>
  191.                
  192.                <title><![CDATA[Add ability to define keyboard type for choose attributes]]></title>
  193.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/7001#msg-7001</link>
  194.                <description><![CDATA[Currently while focusing Choose Attribute on mobile form the default keyboard is opening. It would be great if we could choose what type of keyboard is used. It would help for example in cases when you choose a number from dictionary.]]></description>
  195.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Jarosław Dziekan)]]></author>
  196.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/7001#msg-7001</guid>
  197.                <pubDate>Tue, 08 Apr 2025 12:00:29 +0200</pubDate>
  198.                            </item>
  199.                    <item>
  200.                
  201.                <title><![CDATA[Possibility for the Administrator to delete a user&#039;s comment]]></title>
  202.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/6989#msg-6995</link>
  203.                <description><![CDATA[I think this is a well-thought-out and useful change. It ensures flexibility in comment moderation while maintaining transparency in administrative actions. Offering both options (complete removal or replacement with default text) gives the administrator more control depending on the context. The most crucial part is the change history, which allows for an audit and prevents potential abuse.Currently, the only option is to delete the comment by updating the **WFD_Description** column.]]></description>
  204.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Krystian Golik)]]></author>
  205.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/6989#msg-6995</guid>
  206.                <pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2025 20:09:25 +0200</pubDate>
  207.                            </item>
  208.                    <item>
  209.                
  210.                <title><![CDATA[Possibility for the Administrator to delete a user&#039;s comment]]></title>
  211.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/6989#msg-6989</link>
  212.                <description><![CDATA[Description of change:In the low-code system in the Comments field, the System Administrator should be able to delete a comment added by a user.First option:   The deleted comment will not be visible to normal users. (as if it had never been added)OR Second option:  The deleted comment will be replaced by the default type text: {username} delete added comment (something like deleting a message in Messenger)OR both :)In the change history (in administrative mode), the comment will remain always available for viewing to maintain full transparency of administrative actions.For the system administrator, a Delete option will appear next to each user comment.Justification:Increases control over content entered into the system.Provides the ability to moderate comments where necessary.A change history will allow an audit of administrative actions.]]></description>
  213.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Vitalii Lukash)]]></author>
  214.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/6989#msg-6989</guid>
  215.                <pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2025 00:11:36 +0200</pubDate>
  216.                            </item>
  217.                    <item>
  218.                
  219.                <title><![CDATA[Gantt chart as native report type]]></title>
  220.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5141#msg-6982</link>
  221.                <description><![CDATA[For the time being I have created a workaround:https://daniels-notes.de/posts/2025/custom-gantt-chart]]></description>
  222.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Daniel Krüger Cosmo Consult)]]></author>
  223.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5141#msg-6982</guid>
  224.                <pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2025 21:38:45 +0200</pubDate>
  225.                            </item>
  226.                    <item>
  227.                
  228.                <title><![CDATA[Attachment upload: Add description field]]></title>
  229.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/6974#msg-6974</link>
  230.                <description><![CDATA[Hi,it would be nice, if we could define, whether the description field is displayed is displayed when uploading a new attachment.If we are using the old &quot;add attachment&quot; option we can select the category.If we are using the new &quot;add from camera&quot; option, we can overwrite the filename and set the category.If the user want&#039;s to provide a description, he has to:- finish the upload- Click on attributes- Save the changesIf the description field would be available during the upload, it would:- improve the user experience - reduce the training effort- reduce the number of questionsBest regards,Daniel]]></description>
  231.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Daniel Krüger Cosmo Consult)]]></author>
  232.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/6974#msg-6974</guid>
  233.                <pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2025 06:54:14 +0200</pubDate>
  234.                            </item>
  235.                    <item>
  236.                
  237.                <title><![CDATA[New Release feed for new versions]]></title>
  238.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/6971#msg-6971</link>
  239.                <description><![CDATA[Hi,an additional &quot;Release feed&quot; for new WEBCON BPS updates would be nice to get informed about new releases.Kind RegardsSbastien Anselment]]></description>
  240.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Sébastien Anselment)]]></author>
  241.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/6971#msg-6971</guid>
  242.                <pubDate>Sun, 30 Mar 2025 19:13:16 +0200</pubDate>
  243.                            </item>
  244.                    <item>
  245.                
  246.                <title><![CDATA[Nested comments and like button]]></title>
  247.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/6970#msg-6970</link>
  248.                <description><![CDATA[Hi, it would be great to have the possibility to comment directly to comments. This would help to focus on the different contexts in the comments section. On top a like button would be nice with a function that returns the sum of all comments. Kind RegardsSbastien Anselment]]></description>
  249.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Sébastien Anselment)]]></author>
  250.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/6970#msg-6970</guid>
  251.                <pubDate>Sun, 30 Mar 2025 19:05:06 +0200</pubDate>
  252.                            </item>
  253.                    <item>
  254.                
  255.                <title><![CDATA[Additional option in Active Directory actions - sync mode]]></title>
  256.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/6967#msg-6967</link>
  257.                <description><![CDATA[Please consider adding an additional option in the Active Directory action configuration: &quot;Synchronization Mode: Disabled/None.&quot;In environments where full or incremental Active Directory synchronization is configured to run frequently, and where applications which generates a high volume of changes to AD user/group accounts, this situation leads to unnecessary service activity.]]></description>
  258.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Marek Wołosiewicz)]]></author>
  259.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/6967#msg-6967</guid>
  260.                <pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2025 06:40:49 +0100</pubDate>
  261.                            </item>
  262.                    <item>
  263.                
  264.                <title><![CDATA[Option to set link to Designer Desk of dev system]]></title>
  265.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/6966#msg-6966</link>
  266.                <description><![CDATA[Hi,having dev, test and prod systems it would be great if an admin could set the link to the Designer Desk of the dev system in prod and test systems in the administration of the portal. This way users can open Designer Desk on dev system from prod and test and projects get published in dev system directly. Exporting published projects on prod and importing to dev wouldn&#039;t be necessary anymore - if users would use Designer Desk on prod system instead of dev.Kind RegardsSbastien Anselment]]></description>
  267.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Sébastien Anselment)]]></author>
  268.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/6966#msg-6966</guid>
  269.                <pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2025 14:50:02 +0100</pubDate>
  270.                            </item>
  271.                    <item>
  272.                
  273.                <title><![CDATA[General setting to enable or disable (hide) an application]]></title>
  274.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/6963#msg-6963</link>
  275.                <description><![CDATA[Hi,it would be nice if we could have a global setting in General tab of each application to toggle if the application is enabled or disabled (hidden in the portal) instead of adopting user privileges.Kind RegardsSbastien]]></description>
  276.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Sébastien Anselment)]]></author>
  277.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/6963#msg-6963</guid>
  278.                <pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2025 07:27:56 +0100</pubDate>
  279.                            </item>
  280.                    <item>
  281.                
  282.                <title><![CDATA[https://portal.webconbps.com  - Design Studio is not working]]></title>
  283.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/6905#msg-6958</link>
  284.                <description><![CDATA[This portal is not part of the WEBCON Community, nor is it part of the production of WEBCON installations. It will no longer be available (it presented an unsupported WEBCON BPS version: 2023.x).]]></description>
  285.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Pawel Jawien WEBCON)]]></author>
  286.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/6905#msg-6958</guid>
  287.                <pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2025 12:51:46 +0100</pubDate>
  288.                            </item>
  289.                    <item>
  290.                
  291.                <title><![CDATA[Search panel: Option to change the position of Search everywhere]]></title>
  292.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/6956#msg-6956</link>
  293.                <description><![CDATA[Hi,it would be great, if the &#039;Search panel&#039; configuration would allow the positioning of the &#039;Search everywhere&#039; field.Currently this is always displayed at the top which makes it really tempting to use it for searching, even if there&#039;s a dedicated field has been added.While this is not necessarily an issue, it may become one depending on the search phrase. In our case it takes almost one minute until the search is executed. This is due to the fact, that the SQL server breaks the search phrase into a a lot of parts which has a dramatic effect on the the query. A little background, the search result returned 4 rows and we have only 10795 workflow instances in the table yet.One improvement for our case could be if we switch to a SOLR based report. We have yet to figure out, whether we can replace the SQL filter with a SOLR filter. Therefore it may or not be an option for us.Best regards,Daniel]]></description>
  294.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Daniel Krüger Cosmo Consult)]]></author>
  295.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/6956#msg-6956</guid>
  296.                <pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2025 12:04:27 +0100</pubDate>
  297.                            </item>
  298.                    <item>
  299.                
  300.                <title><![CDATA[Attachment preview in a new tab]]></title>
  301.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/6914#msg-6914</link>
  302.                <description><![CDATA[Hi, while using the functionality of opening an attachment preview in a new tab, I noticed that when we start previewing two different PDF invoices in one tab, the system will always display the one that was opened last in the base tab in the newly opened tab. It would be good to allow opening many different files in a new tab, from different elements, so that it does not overwrite the newly opened PDF.]]></description>
  303.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Krzysztof Gaszczyk)]]></author>
  304.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/6914#msg-6914</guid>
  305.                <pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2025 11:25:20 +0100</pubDate>
  306.                            </item>
  307.                    <item>
  308.                
  309.                <title><![CDATA[Calendar Annual View]]></title>
  310.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/2916#msg-6911</link>
  311.                <description><![CDATA[Yes, please! A annual calendar view would be great!kind regardsErnst]]></description>
  312.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (macchina)]]></author>
  313.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/2916#msg-6911</guid>
  314.                <pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2025 09:54:49 +0100</pubDate>
  315.                            </item>
  316.                    <item>
  317.                
  318.                <title><![CDATA[https://portal.webconbps.com  - Design Studio is not working]]></title>
  319.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/6905#msg-6905</link>
  320.                <description><![CDATA[I guess - your certificate is out of date:]]></description>
  321.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Paweł Tołoczko)]]></author>
  322.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/6905#msg-6905</guid>
  323.                <pubDate>Sat, 15 Mar 2025 23:33:28 +0100</pubDate>
  324.                            </item>
  325.                    <item>
  326.                
  327.                <title><![CDATA[Waiting for sub workflow step shouldn&#039;t check the type of the user license]]></title>
  328.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/6801#msg-6903</link>
  329.                <description><![CDATA[Under review :)]]></description>
  330.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Michal Rykiert)]]></author>
  331.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/6801#msg-6903</guid>
  332.                <pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2025 14:26:20 +0100</pubDate>
  333.                            </item>
  334.                    <item>
  335.                
  336.                <title><![CDATA[Added HTML formatting options to the description of groups and to the description of tabs]]></title>
  337.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/6800#msg-6902</link>
  338.                <description><![CDATA[We&#039;re currently unifying all of the options of displaying different types of text across the whole system. In some areas, that will mean adding more rich editing options. However, we&#039;re not planning on introducing full HTML formatting everywhere as it poses too many risks (security and e.g. execution of JS being one of them). With that said, I&#039;m changing the status to &quot;not now&quot;, although you may expect improvements in some areas.]]></description>
  339.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Michal Rykiert)]]></author>
  340.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/6800#msg-6902</guid>
  341.                <pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2025 14:25:50 +0100</pubDate>
  342.                            </item>
  343.                    <item>
  344.                
  345.                <title><![CDATA[Option to store the generated document id]]></title>
  346.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/6799#msg-6900</link>
  347.                <description><![CDATA[It goes straight to the backlog :)]]></description>
  348.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Michal Rykiert)]]></author>
  349.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/6799#msg-6900</guid>
  350.                <pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2025 14:22:34 +0100</pubDate>
  351.                            </item>
  352.                    <item>
  353.                
  354.                <title><![CDATA[Page dirty -&gt; Required star next to save button]]></title>
  355.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/6798#msg-6899</link>
  356.                <description><![CDATA[Under review :)]]></description>
  357.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Michal Rykiert)]]></author>
  358.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/6798#msg-6899</guid>
  359.                <pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2025 14:21:53 +0100</pubDate>
  360.                            </item>
  361.                    <item>
  362.                
  363.                <title><![CDATA[Handling of compressed responses by REST Data Sources]]></title>
  364.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/6779#msg-6897</link>
  365.                <description><![CDATA[We&#039;re reviewing your suggestion from the overall roadmap perspective. For now, I&#039;m changing the status accordingly.]]></description>
  366.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Michal Rykiert)]]></author>
  367.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/6779#msg-6897</guid>
  368.                <pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2025 14:19:09 +0100</pubDate>
  369.                            </item>
  370.                    <item>
  371.                
  372.                <title><![CDATA[WE TOO: [2024.1.1.187] -&gt;Multiple lines of text as formatted editor (RichText) not working?]]></title>
  373.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/6778#msg-6896</link>
  374.                <description><![CDATA[This case is already address and will soon be available in one of the newer releases. I&#039;ll update the post once I know the exact release number.]]></description>
  375.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Michal Rykiert)]]></author>
  376.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/6778#msg-6896</guid>
  377.                <pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2025 14:17:43 +0100</pubDate>
  378.                            </item>
  379.                    <item>
  380.                
  381.                <title><![CDATA[Add &#039;none&#039; keyboard type for mobile forms.]]></title>
  382.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/6771#msg-6895</link>
  383.                <description><![CDATA[This should be fairly easy to do. It goes straight into the backlog.]]></description>
  384.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Michal Rykiert)]]></author>
  385.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/6771#msg-6895</guid>
  386.                <pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2025 14:16:33 +0100</pubDate>
  387.                            </item>
  388.                    <item>
  389.                
  390.                <title><![CDATA[No private report views in 2024 or higher]]></title>
  391.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/6765#msg-6894</link>
  392.                <description><![CDATA[We&#039;re reviewing the situation as it&#039;s a bit more intricate than you described. We&#039;ll update this tread whenever a decision is reached.]]></description>
  393.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Michal Rykiert)]]></author>
  394.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/6765#msg-6894</guid>
  395.                <pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2025 14:15:23 +0100</pubDate>
  396.                            </item>
  397.                    <item>
  398.                
  399.                <title><![CDATA[Feature Request – Centralized Management of Webcon Mobile App Configuration via MDM Intune]]></title>
  400.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/6716#msg-6892</link>
  401.                <description><![CDATA[Hi Damian, I sustain what Daniel said. We are not planning on investing in further development of BPS Mobile 2022. It can be pushed via Intune, however without user profiles. With that said, we&#039;re focusing on the future development of our current solutions.]]></description>
  402.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Michal Rykiert)]]></author>
  403.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/6716#msg-6892</guid>
  404.                <pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2025 14:10:55 +0100</pubDate>
  405.                            </item>
  406.                    <item>
  407.                
  408.                <title><![CDATA[New form rule to display an attachment]]></title>
  409.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/6843#msg-6843</link>
  410.                <description><![CDATA[Hi,we can display the first attachment on page load. Unfortunately, this only works if the attachment is not displayed as a popup.Even if the documentation is updated to mention this different behavior. I find it counter intuitive that this should be a differentInstead of changing the current way, I would prefer a form rule which can be used to display an attachment in the preview. This way we wouldn&#039;t be limited to the first attachment but could get the attachment to display with a business rule or similar.Best regards, Daniel]]></description>
  411.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Daniel Krüger Cosmo Consult)]]></author>
  412.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/6843#msg-6843</guid>
  413.                <pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2025 17:02:11 +0100</pubDate>
  414.                            </item>
  415.                    <item>
  416.                
  417.                <title><![CDATA[Hiding Rows in Items Lists]]></title>
  418.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/552#msg-6830</link>
  419.                <description><![CDATA[Hi,meanwhile I&#039;m using a little workaround and the Acceptance functionality (still in Version 21, but I hope it will persist).I create a data source, where I check for each line of the items list in this instance for a certain condition (in this case &quot;book = 1&quot;) in an IIF statement and as result I get the actual users name or a dummy user.Using this data source for the acceptance criteria it has the following effect:For each line with the &quot;positive&quot; result it will set a user (dummy) that is different to the actual user and thus the acceptance function is hiding the row.For each line with the negative result it will set the actual user, thus the line is visible to whoever is working on this instance. SELECT       IIF({DCNCOL:2444} = 1, &#039;exdom1\webcon&#039;, &#039;{I:CURRENTUSER}&#039;) AS colmnFROM            dbo.WFElementDetails INNER JOIN                         dbo.WFElements ON dbo.WFElementDetails.DET_WFDID = dbo.WFElements.WFD_IDWHERE        (dbo.WFElements.WFD_ID = {WFD_ID})  AND (dbo.WFElementDetails.DET_WFCONID = {WFCON:8075})  AND (dbo.WFElementDetails.DET_ID = {S:DET_ID})Kind Regards,Klaus]]></description>
  420.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Klaus Seidler)]]></author>
  421.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/552#msg-6830</guid>
  422.                <pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2025 09:15:38 +0100</pubDate>
  423.                            </item>
  424.                    <item>
  425.                
  426.                <title><![CDATA[Hiding Rows in Items Lists]]></title>
  427.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/552#msg-6828</link>
  428.                <description><![CDATA[Hi Daniel,have you used the features in version 2023? It looks like the definition of the item list has changed. The current content returns an unknown error]]></description>
  429.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Damian)]]></author>
  430.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/552#msg-6828</guid>
  431.                <pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2025 08:09:15 +0100</pubDate>
  432.                            </item>
  433.                    <item>
  434.                
  435.                <title><![CDATA[Waiting for sub workflow step shouldn&#039;t check the type of the user license]]></title>
  436.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/6801#msg-6801</link>
  437.                <description><![CDATA[Hi,it would be great, if the &quot;Waiting for sub workflow&quot; step wouldn&#039;t check the type of the user license.Imagine the following use case:There&#039;s a parent workflow which is used by a few users and a child workflow used by all users of a company. The users of the parent workflow have an Unlimited-Solutions Access License.The users of the child workflow have a Single-Solution Access License.After the parent started a few child workflow and is in the &quot;Waiting for sub workflow&quot; step.Once the child workflows are completed the parent workflow should move on.This works fine, if the user completing the child workflow has an Unlimited-Solutions Access License. If the user has a Single-Solution Access License the error &quot;No Single Solution license for the user.&quot; is thrown.We worked around this by:- Moving the child workflow to a system step, if the user has only a Single-Solution Access License.- The step has a 1 minute timeout, which will then move the child workflow forward to the intended step.I&#039;ve the following issues with this:- The the error itself is correct, it&#039;s misleading because it&#039;s caused by the parent workflow. - It&#039;s very likely that this issue will only encountered in the production environment.- It introduces an unnecessary complexity to the child workflow.WEBCON Version 2025.1.1.105I&#039;ve copied the license labels from:https://community.webcon.com/posts/post/licensing/356/10Best regards,Daniel]]></description>
  438.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Daniel Krüger Cosmo Consult)]]></author>
  439.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/6801#msg-6801</guid>
  440.                <pubDate>Wed, 05 Mar 2025 12:39:09 +0100</pubDate>
  441.                            </item>
  442.                    <item>
  443.                
  444.                <title><![CDATA[Added HTML formatting options to the description of groups and to the description of tabs]]></title>
  445.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/6800#msg-6800</link>
  446.                <description><![CDATA[HiIn order to improve and standardize the appearance of data entered in the description field, I propose adding the option of formatting HTML text in the description of groups and tabs.Similarly to what is possible in the description fields on attributes.Regards]]></description>
  447.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Karol Częczek)]]></author>
  448.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/6800#msg-6800</guid>
  449.                <pubDate>Wed, 05 Mar 2025 10:38:38 +0100</pubDate>
  450.                            </item>
  451.                    <item>
  452.                
  453.                <title><![CDATA[Option to store the generated document id]]></title>
  454.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/6799#msg-6799</link>
  455.                <description><![CDATA[Hi,it would really be nice to have an option to store the created attachment id in a field /parameter.Right now I have a &quot;change value of single field&quot; action afterwards which retrieves the id of the last created attachment. It should always be the one which was created just before. But it doesn&#039;t &quot;feel&quot; right. This option should be available on all attachment actions.Best regards,Daniel]]></description>
  456.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Daniel Krüger Cosmo Consult)]]></author>
  457.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/6799#msg-6799</guid>
  458.                <pubDate>Wed, 05 Mar 2025 09:39:18 +0100</pubDate>
  459.                            </item>
  460.                    <item>
  461.                
  462.                <title><![CDATA[Page dirty -&gt; Required star next to save button]]></title>
  463.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/6798#msg-6798</link>
  464.                <description><![CDATA[Hi,I just noticed that the required star is added to the save button, when a new item list row is added in 2025.1.1.105. It would be great if the required star is added whenever a form field was modified, the page is dirty.There&#039;s already the session storage key &quot;WebconBPS_FormIsDirty&quot; and the functionality to add the required star.It&#039;s probably not complicated to combine the functionalities.Edit:The star is also added, when a field is modified in one tab and the user switches to another.Best regards,Daniel]]></description>
  465.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Daniel Krüger Cosmo Consult)]]></author>
  466.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/6798#msg-6798</guid>
  467.                <pubDate>Tue, 04 Mar 2025 22:26:23 +0100</pubDate>
  468.                            </item>
  469.                    <item>
  470.                
  471.                <title><![CDATA[Adding the [Raw Text] option to business rules.]]></title>
  472.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5645#msg-6795</link>
  473.                <description><![CDATA[Update:Another six month have passed and the customer had to upgrade from WEBCON BPS 2022.We used the business rule in a data source to create a dynamic REST filter. As expected this feature is no longer working, therefore I created a ticket:This is my summary of the official response:- We could create dynamic server side filtering using business rules up to WEBCON BPS 2022- This feature has been (unintentionally) been remove in 2023- There&#039;s some (slight) chance that it will be &quot;revived&quot;. - Even if the decision is positive, it will take a long time (quarters) until it will be available.]]></description>
  474.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Daniel Krüger Cosmo Consult)]]></author>
  475.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5645#msg-6795</guid>
  476.                <pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2025 16:40:35 +0100</pubDate>
  477.                            </item>
  478.                    <item>
  479.                
  480.                <title><![CDATA[Add &#039;none&#039; keyboard type for mobile forms.]]></title>
  481.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/6771#msg-6794</link>
  482.                <description><![CDATA[I would also love to have this, because in our work it would be game changer.]]></description>
  483.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Rafal)]]></author>
  484.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/6771#msg-6794</guid>
  485.                <pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2025 13:51:12 +0100</pubDate>
  486.                            </item>
  487.                    <item>
  488.                
  489.                <title><![CDATA[Handling of compressed responses by REST Data Sources]]></title>
  490.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/6779#msg-6779</link>
  491.                <description><![CDATA[We ran into the issue that one of our systems started to enforce compression for its HTTP responses.They are now compressed as gzip which leads to an error when trying to access data from the system using a REST Web Service Data source in Webcon.I can help myself by implementing a custom data source, but if there is a native solution, I would be glad to hear about it.]]></description>
  492.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Waldemar Schatz)]]></author>
  493.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/6779#msg-6779</guid>
  494.                <pubDate>Wed, 26 Feb 2025 10:58:37 +0100</pubDate>
  495.                            </item>
  496.                    <item>
  497.                
  498.                <title><![CDATA[WE TOO: [2024.1.1.187] -&gt;Multiple lines of text as formatted editor (RichText) not working?]]></title>
  499.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/6778#msg-6778</link>
  500.                <description><![CDATA[Subject: Issue with RichText MultiLine Fields After Upgrade to 2024.1.1.187 Dear WEBCON team, Over the past two weeks, we upgraded our servers from 2023.1.3.29 to 2024.1.1.187. We are now encountering the same issue that Micha Ludwiczak described on 2025-01-03: https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/6483/15 He reported:&quot;I&#039;ve just found out that when I switch a multiple lines of text field from standard to formatted, it simply disappears, and a type error occurs without further explanation. Is this just happening to me, or is it a common issue in the latest version?&quot; We are experiencing the same problem across different servers, along with an unexpected exception. [EXTERNAL PROD SERVER]We are using RichText MultiLine fields.We receive a TypeError message: the label is displayed, but the control field is missing.When switching the field to standard text, the error disappears. However, switching it back to formatted text causes the error to reoccur. Now the strange part  Test Results:[INTERNAL PROD &amp; TEST]  No issues[INTERNAL DEV]  Same error as EXTERNAL PRODWhen we deploy the production version of the application to the DEV environment, the previously working version starts exhibiting the same issue.Initially, we suspected the issue was caused by adding HTML  tags to the field. However, on [EXTERNAL PROD], the affected fields were empty with no default value. Since the User Voice thread was closed, have you already found a solution for this issue?Or are we the second team to encounter this problem? We appreciate any assistance you can provide. Best regards,Bjoern &amp; Lena]]></description>
  501.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Bjoern Poller)]]></author>
  502.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/6778#msg-6778</guid>
  503.                <pubDate>Wed, 26 Feb 2025 08:34:43 +0100</pubDate>
  504.                            </item>
  505.                    <item>
  506.                
  507.                <title><![CDATA[Add &#039;none&#039; keyboard type for mobile forms.]]></title>
  508.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/6771#msg-6771</link>
  509.                <description><![CDATA[Currently we have following keyboard types that can be used for Text Attributes: text, search, decimal, numeric, url, email, tel. But sometimes we don&#039;t want device to show any keyboard. For example if you are creating process for user with barcode gun. The keybaord that shows on the screen can take half of the screeen. The perfect solution would be to add &#039;none&#039; option to keyboard types.]]></description>
  510.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Jarosław Dziekan)]]></author>
  511.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/6771#msg-6771</guid>
  512.                <pubDate>Mon, 24 Feb 2025 11:19:26 +0100</pubDate>
  513.                            </item>
  514.                    <item>
  515.                
  516.                <title><![CDATA[Concat - Vertical Layout]]></title>
  517.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5057#msg-6768</link>
  518.                <description><![CDATA[Lovely! :)]]></description>
  519.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Maksymilian Stachowiak)]]></author>
  520.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5057#msg-6768</guid>
  521.                <pubDate>Fri, 21 Feb 2025 16:07:38 +0100</pubDate>
  522.                            </item>
  523.                    <item>
  524.                
  525.                <title><![CDATA[Concat - Vertical Layout]]></title>
  526.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5057#msg-6767</link>
  527.                <description><![CDATA[Confirmed to be introduced in 2025 R2 :)]]></description>
  528.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Michal Rykiert)]]></author>
  529.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5057#msg-6767</guid>
  530.                <pubDate>Fri, 21 Feb 2025 16:06:50 +0100</pubDate>
  531.                            </item>
  532.                    <item>
  533.                
  534.                <title><![CDATA[No private report views in 2024 or higher]]></title>
  535.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/6765#msg-6765</link>
  536.                <description><![CDATA[We are currently in the process of upgrading from the 2023 to 2025. Unfortunately, we were hit with some very bad newsstarting from the 2024 version, the ability to define private views for reports configured on the dashboard has been removed.This is a significant issue for us, as users rely heavily on this functionality. Once the upgrade is deployed to the production server, it is likely to cause considerable disappointment.Personally, I dont quite understand why this feature was removed, and I believe it is a major step backward in terms of UX. Instead of using personalized private views on the dashboarda place that consolidates data from multiple areasusers will now be forced to reconfigure reports every time they enter the dashboard or navigate between individual reports to access the desired view.There is no mention of this change in the changelog. Support has informed me that the changelog will be updated to include information about the removal of this functionality.What makes this situation even more paradoxical is that, from a configuration standpoint, both reports and views (whether application-based or those set up on the dashboard) are stored in the database as identical elements in the same table. The only difference is that the functionality has been stripped from the front-end.WEBCON: Is there any chance this feature will be reinstated in the future?COMMUNITY: Do you also find the removal of this functionality to be a major issue?]]></description>
  537.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Mariusz Burek)]]></author>
  538.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/6765#msg-6765</guid>
  539.                <pubDate>Fri, 21 Feb 2025 13:28:28 +0100</pubDate>
  540.                            </item>
  541.                    <item>
  542.                
  543.                <title><![CDATA[Expanding the User Update API with Additional Synchronization Data]]></title>
  544.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/6021#msg-6736</link>
  545.                <description><![CDATA[We didn&#039;t receive any other voices regarding this case. Therefore, I&#039;m closing the thread.]]></description>
  546.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Michal Rykiert)]]></author>
  547.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/6021#msg-6736</guid>
  548.                <pubDate>Fri, 14 Feb 2025 15:27:00 +0100</pubDate>
  549.                            </item>
  550.                    <item>
  551.                
  552.                <title><![CDATA[Option to disable alternating table rows colors]]></title>
  553.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/6690#msg-6735</link>
  554.                <description><![CDATA[Hey Martin, as such we won&#039;t be introducing the alternating table row colors functionality. However, we work on other functionalities that should address your case. Stay tuned for updates. For now, I&#039;m marking the thread as &quot;closed&quot; since we need to wait for new functionalities to be introduced.]]></description>
  555.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Michal Rykiert)]]></author>
  556.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/6690#msg-6735</guid>
  557.                <pubDate>Fri, 14 Feb 2025 15:25:01 +0100</pubDate>
  558.                            </item>
  559.                    <item>
  560.                
  561.                <title><![CDATA[Missing Add new step button in 2025]]></title>
  562.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/6669#msg-6734</link>
  563.                <description><![CDATA[It&#039;s exactly as Daniel stated. The intoduction of phases and actors in a sense enforced such change and we&#039;ll stick to it.]]></description>
  564.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Michal Rykiert)]]></author>
  565.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/6669#msg-6734</guid>
  566.                <pubDate>Fri, 14 Feb 2025 15:22:54 +0100</pubDate>
  567.                            </item>
  568.                    <item>
  569.                
  570.                <title><![CDATA[KB article is directing to Webcon version not available in download]]></title>
  571.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/6658#msg-6733</link>
  572.                <description><![CDATA[Thanks for noticing. It should be all right now.]]></description>
  573.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Michal Rykiert)]]></author>
  574.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/6658#msg-6733</guid>
  575.                <pubDate>Fri, 14 Feb 2025 15:21:36 +0100</pubDate>
  576.                            </item>
  577.                    <item>
  578.                
  579.                <title><![CDATA[Custom Dashboard Icons (2025+)]]></title>
  580.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/6637#msg-6732</link>
  581.                <description><![CDATA[This case is inderictly poses a question where is the optimal balance between standardization and customization. After internal discussion, we believe standardization is more important for a unified UX for all of our users. Therefore we plan on sticking with the default indicators of repors and dashbaords.]]></description>
  582.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Michal Rykiert)]]></author>
  583.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/6637#msg-6732</guid>
  584.                <pubDate>Fri, 14 Feb 2025 15:20:47 +0100</pubDate>
  585.                            </item>
  586.                    <item>
  587.                
  588.                <title><![CDATA[In article no pictures]]></title>
  589.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/6597#msg-6731</link>
  590.                <description><![CDATA[I&#039;m closing the thread then :)]]></description>
  591.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Michal Rykiert)]]></author>
  592.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/6597#msg-6731</guid>
  593.                <pubDate>Fri, 14 Feb 2025 15:17:59 +0100</pubDate>
  594.                            </item>
  595.                    <item>
  596.                
  597.                <title><![CDATA[Center the label name]]></title>
  598.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/6575#msg-6730</link>
  599.                <description><![CDATA[@Jacek: thanks for sharing the tip.@Dariusz: we&#039;re working on a functionality that would address your request. It won&#039;t be implemented as part of data table functionality, but it should do the trick nonetheless. I&#039;m marking the topic as closed, but stay tuned for updates :)]]></description>
  600.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Michal Rykiert)]]></author>
  601.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/6575#msg-6730</guid>
  602.                <pubDate>Fri, 14 Feb 2025 15:16:52 +0100</pubDate>
  603.                            </item>
  604.                    <item>
  605.                
  606.                <title><![CDATA[Application import: What if/ Run as test]]></title>
  607.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/6572#msg-6729</link>
  608.                <description><![CDATA[Hi Daniel, we discussed your idea internally. Conceptually it would be a nice feature. However, after analysis, we decided there are too many implications that would have to be addressed for it to work properly, and the end result wouldn&#039;t justify the cost. So we&#039;re keeping your idea in mind, but for now it won&#039;t happen.]]></description>
  609.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Michal Rykiert)]]></author>
  610.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/6572#msg-6729</guid>
  611.                <pubDate>Fri, 14 Feb 2025 15:11:21 +0100</pubDate>
  612.                            </item>
  613.                    <item>
  614.                
  615.                <title><![CDATA[Feature Request – Centralized Management of Webcon Mobile App Configuration via MDM Intune]]></title>
  616.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/6716#msg-6720</link>
  617.                <description><![CDATA[Hi Damian,while it&#039;s great that you put together all the related posts, I just want to point out that the development support for WEBCON BPS 2023 will end in three months:https://community.webcon.com/posts/post/webcon-bps-development-support-policy/520/10Therefore I highly doubt, that anything will be changed for an older version.Besides this, there&#039;s a complete new mobile application which doesn&#039;t use this kind of configuration. This was replaced by a simple QR Code which the users can scan simply scan:https://docs.webcon.com/docs/2024R1/MobileAppBest regards,Daniel]]></description>
  618.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Daniel Krüger Cosmo Consult)]]></author>
  619.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/6716#msg-6720</guid>
  620.                <pubDate>Wed, 12 Feb 2025 21:51:49 +0100</pubDate>
  621.                            </item>
  622.                    <item>
  623.                
  624.                <title><![CDATA[Feature Request – Centralized Management of Webcon Mobile App Configuration via MDM Intune]]></title>
  625.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/6716#msg-6716</link>
  626.                <description><![CDATA[Dear Webcon Team,I would like to kindly request the addition of a feature that would allow centralized management of the Webcon Mobile App configuration across multiple iOS and Android devices using a configuration file distributed through MDM Intune.This functionality would apply specifically to the WEBCON BPS 2022 mobile application.This feature would greatly enhance the deployment and maintenance of mobile app settings in large organizations by enabling administrators to standardize and automate app configurations without the need for manual input on individual devices. Key capabilities I would suggest for this feature include:1. Support for Configuration Files  The ability to import or apply settings from a predefined configuration file.2. Integration with MDM Intune  Seamless compatibility with MDM Intune or other mobile device management (MDM) platforms.3. Configuration Parameters  Settings for server address, authentication preferences, notifications, and other key app behaviors.4. Bulk Device Support  Apply consistent configurations across numerous mobile devices with minimal effort.This functionality would significantly improve efficiency, security, and user experience by reducing the risk of misconfiguration. We believe that many Webcon customers who manage enterprise environments would greatly benefit from such an enhancement.For reference, I would like to highlight related topics that have already been discussed in the community:Thread discussing similar needs: https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/2135?messageid=2135Article on Mobile App Remote Profile Configuration: https://community.webcon.com/posts/post/2022-mobile-app-remote-profile-configuration/339/3Article on 2019 Mobile Application Profile Configuration (currently unavailable):https://howto.webcon.com/2019-mobile-application-profile-remote-configuration/Thank you for your consideration. I look forward to hearing your thoughts on this request.Kind regards,Damian]]></description>
  627.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Damian Koziarz)]]></author>
  628.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/6716#msg-6716</guid>
  629.                <pubDate>Wed, 12 Feb 2025 15:27:43 +0100</pubDate>
  630.                            </item>
  631.                    <item>
  632.                
  633.                <title><![CDATA[Replacing a user]]></title>
  634.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/6327#msg-6715</link>
  635.                <description><![CDATA[Hi, and what about similar scenario - user changed domain from let&#039;s say johndoe@acme.local to johndoe@acme.com?We are prepairing to sync local domain to Azure AD and this is a potential problem becouse all tasks in db are assigned to johndoe@acme.local and system propably won&#039;t match user to johndoe@acme.comSo if user will login &quot;new domain&quot; old tasks won&#039;t be available for him.]]></description>
  636.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Marcin Lorens)]]></author>
  637.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/6327#msg-6715</guid>
  638.                <pubDate>Wed, 12 Feb 2025 10:43:47 +0100</pubDate>
  639.                            </item>
  640.                    <item>
  641.                
  642.                <title><![CDATA[Option to disable alternating table rows colors]]></title>
  643.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/6690#msg-6690</link>
  644.                <description><![CDATA[Would it be possible to implement an option that would allow us to disable the alternating coloring of data tables on the form?]]></description>
  645.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Martin Meze Freelancer)]]></author>
  646.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/6690#msg-6690</guid>
  647.                <pubDate>Fri, 07 Feb 2025 10:49:06 +0100</pubDate>
  648.                            </item>
  649.                    <item>
  650.                
  651.                <title><![CDATA[Missing Add new step button in 2025]]></title>
  652.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/6669#msg-6672</link>
  653.                <description><![CDATA[Hi Alicja,this is by design. Quote from the change log:Enabling Workflow phases is equivalent to activating the grouping and sorting of steps by defined phases in the Workflow steps section (General tab). At the same time, __new steps__ can no longer be added here.Best regards,Daniel]]></description>
  654.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Daniel Krüger Cosmo Consult)]]></author>
  655.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/6669#msg-6672</guid>
  656.                <pubDate>Wed, 29 Jan 2025 20:38:58 +0100</pubDate>
  657.                            </item>
  658.                    <item>
  659.                
  660.                <title><![CDATA[Missing Add new step button in 2025]]></title>
  661.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/6669#msg-6669</link>
  662.                <description><![CDATA[Why in 2025 version add (new step) button is missing from General tab and user can only add steps in Workflow designer? Is there any chance that you&#039;ll restore it in next version?]]></description>
  663.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Alicja)]]></author>
  664.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/6669#msg-6669</guid>
  665.                <pubDate>Wed, 29 Jan 2025 12:59:58 +0100</pubDate>
  666.                            </item>
  667.                    <item>
  668.                
  669.                <title><![CDATA[KB article is directing to Webcon version not available in download]]></title>
  670.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/6658#msg-6658</link>
  671.                <description><![CDATA[KB article is directing to Webcon version not available in downloadhttps://community.webcon.com/posts/post/manual-database-update-prerequisites-and-procedure/515/3[quote]The problem has been fixed in versions 2023.1.3.326, 2024.1.1.193, 2025.1.1.72 by adding a mechanism in the installer (launched when installing or updating a WEBCON BPS version) to automatically update the attachment database, switch it to Unicode mode and change the text column types from varchar or text to nvarchar or ntext. The automatic update can take up to a few minutes for each attachment database.[/quote]]]></description>
  672.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Paweł Tołoczko)]]></author>
  673.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/6658#msg-6658</guid>
  674.                <pubDate>Sun, 26 Jan 2025 00:02:36 +0100</pubDate>
  675.                            </item>
  676.                    <item>
  677.                
  678.                <title><![CDATA[Center the label name]]></title>
  679.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/6575#msg-6657</link>
  680.                <description><![CDATA[Hi Dariusz,center the text (and make it bold) in the item list you can achieve with the SET CELL STYLE form rule and set &quot;text-align:center; font-weight:bold&quot;Regards,Jacek]]></description>
  681.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Jacek Wojnar)]]></author>
  682.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/6575#msg-6657</guid>
  683.                <pubDate>Sat, 25 Jan 2025 15:40:47 +0100</pubDate>
  684.                            </item>
  685.                    <item>
  686.                
  687.                <title><![CDATA[BPS 2025: Popup search should focus on input instead of the close button]]></title>
  688.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/6215#msg-6655</link>
  689.                <description><![CDATA[Done! It will be introduced in 2025 R2]]></description>
  690.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Michal Rykiert)]]></author>
  691.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/6215#msg-6655</guid>
  692.                <pubDate>Fri, 24 Jan 2025 16:08:21 +0100</pubDate>
  693.                            </item>
  694.                    <item>
  695.                
  696.                <title><![CDATA[Global privilege level “application access”]]></title>
  697.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/6508#msg-6643</link>
  698.                <description><![CDATA[Update! It&#039;s done and the improvement will be introduced in v. 2025 R2 :)]]></description>
  699.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Michal Rykiert)]]></author>
  700.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/6508#msg-6643</guid>
  701.                <pubDate>Thu, 23 Jan 2025 15:18:46 +0100</pubDate>
  702.                            </item>
  703.                    <item>
  704.                
  705.                <title><![CDATA[Change field value actions: Ignore field visibility/editability when setting fields]]></title>
  706.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5894#msg-6642</link>
  707.                <description><![CDATA[It&#039;s done and it will be available in v. 2025 R2]]></description>
  708.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Michal Rykiert)]]></author>
  709.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5894#msg-6642</guid>
  710.                <pubDate>Thu, 23 Jan 2025 15:18:37 +0100</pubDate>
  711.                            </item>
  712.                    <item>
  713.                
  714.                <title><![CDATA[Workflow control actions: Ignore field visibility/editability when setting fields]]></title>
  715.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5796#msg-6641</link>
  716.                <description><![CDATA[It&#039;s done and it&#039;s going to be available in v. 2025 R2 :)]]></description>
  717.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Michal Rykiert)]]></author>
  718.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5796#msg-6641</guid>
  719.                <pubDate>Thu, 23 Jan 2025 15:17:55 +0100</pubDate>
  720.                            </item>
  721.                    <item>
  722.                
  723.                <title><![CDATA[Changes to the path configuration view]]></title>
  724.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5783#msg-6640</link>
  725.                <description><![CDATA[Update! It&#039;s done and the improvement will be introduced in v. 2025 R2 :)]]></description>
  726.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Michal Rykiert)]]></author>
  727.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5783#msg-6640</guid>
  728.                <pubDate>Thu, 23 Jan 2025 15:17:28 +0100</pubDate>
  729.                            </item>
  730.                    <item>
  731.                
  732.                <title><![CDATA[IS IN - vertical layout]]></title>
  733.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5731#msg-6639</link>
  734.                <description><![CDATA[Update! It&#039;s done and the improvement will be introduced in v. 2025 R2 :)]]></description>
  735.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Michal Rykiert)]]></author>
  736.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5731#msg-6639</guid>
  737.                <pubDate>Thu, 23 Jan 2025 15:17:09 +0100</pubDate>
  738.                            </item>
  739.                    <item>
  740.                
  741.                <title><![CDATA[Custom Dashboard Icons (2025+)]]></title>
  742.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/6637#msg-6637</link>
  743.                <description><![CDATA[Hello,just a quick idea - as of 2025 version, we are able to select custom app icons for applications.What do you thing about allowing selection of icons for reports / dashboards in navigation menu?]]></description>
  744.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Maksymilian Stachowiak)]]></author>
  745.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/6637#msg-6637</guid>
  746.                <pubDate>Thu, 23 Jan 2025 11:38:10 +0100</pubDate>
  747.                            </item>
  748.                    <item>
  749.                
  750.                <title><![CDATA[In article no pictures]]></title>
  751.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/6597#msg-6623</link>
  752.                <description><![CDATA[Hi,Today is working... 2 days ago I have micro pictures - with no response ... Today they are OK.]]></description>
  753.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Paweł Tołoczko)]]></author>
  754.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/6597#msg-6623</guid>
  755.                <pubDate>Thu, 23 Jan 2025 09:51:07 +0100</pubDate>
  756.                            </item>
  757.                    <item>
  758.                
  759.                <title><![CDATA[In article no pictures]]></title>
  760.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/6597#msg-6622</link>
  761.                <description><![CDATA[Hi Pawe,are the images still not visible on your side?I&#039;ve just checked the page and it seems fineCheers,Dawid]]></description>
  762.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Dawid Porowski)]]></author>
  763.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/6597#msg-6622</guid>
  764.                <pubDate>Thu, 23 Jan 2025 08:57:29 +0100</pubDate>
  765.                            </item>
  766.                    <item>
  767.                
  768.                <title><![CDATA[Support batch processing]]></title>
  769.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/6524#msg-6604</link>
  770.                <description><![CDATA[Hi Marcin, given current pipeline of priorities we&#039;re not planning on modifying REST API in the area you suggested. However, we may revisit your idea in the future.]]></description>
  771.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Michal Rykiert)]]></author>
  772.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/6524#msg-6604</guid>
  773.                <pubDate>Tue, 21 Jan 2025 16:48:16 +0100</pubDate>
  774.                            </item>
  775.                    <item>
  776.                
  777.                <title><![CDATA[In article no pictures]]></title>
  778.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/6597#msg-6597</link>
  779.                <description><![CDATA[https://community.webcon.com/posts/post/wfhistoryelements-and-wfhistoryelementdetails-tables-description/56/26]]></description>
  780.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Paweł Tołoczko)]]></author>
  781.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/6597#msg-6597</guid>
  782.                <pubDate>Tue, 21 Jan 2025 09:16:51 +0100</pubDate>
  783.                            </item>
  784.                    <item>
  785.                
  786.                <title><![CDATA[UI / UX improvements]]></title>
  787.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/6060#msg-6596</link>
  788.                <description><![CDATA[Hi,Thank you for your response.Regarding my search-related propositions - could you specify which of them will be introduced in 2025 and which not?]]></description>
  789.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (DawidKuzyka_mBH)]]></author>
  790.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/6060#msg-6596</guid>
  791.                <pubDate>Tue, 21 Jan 2025 08:02:07 +0100</pubDate>
  792.                            </item>
  793.                    <item>
  794.                
  795.                <title><![CDATA[Would it be possible to have an iOS version of Designer Studio?]]></title>
  796.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/6526#msg-6593</link>
  797.                <description><![CDATA[Hi Roman, we plan to have something even better than that :). And that is web-based Designer Studio which as such would be platform-agnostic. The work on it is already initiated, but it&#039;s a huge project, so please be patient. We&#039;ll make it work, we just need proper amount of time to do it right :). As such, I&#039;ll label this thread as &quot;not now&quot; (as there won&#039;t be iOS version of Designer Studio), but please keep in mind the information above.]]></description>
  798.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Michal Rykiert)]]></author>
  799.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/6526#msg-6593</guid>
  800.                <pubDate>Mon, 20 Jan 2025 16:50:38 +0100</pubDate>
  801.                            </item>
  802.                    <item>
  803.                
  804.                <title><![CDATA[Global privilege level “application access”]]></title>
  805.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/6508#msg-6592</link>
  806.                <description><![CDATA[Hi Karol, we&#039;re planning on adding the &quot;Auditor&quot; role and it functionally it will meet your permission suggestion. You may expect it very soon :)]]></description>
  807.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Michal Rykiert)]]></author>
  808.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/6508#msg-6592</guid>
  809.                <pubDate>Mon, 20 Jan 2025 16:47:14 +0100</pubDate>
  810.                            </item>
  811.                    <item>
  812.                
  813.                <title><![CDATA[Outlook Classic tile restriction]]></title>
  814.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/6499#msg-6591</link>
  815.                <description><![CDATA[Hi Laviee, I have a bad news and good news ;). The bad news is that it&#039;s not possible to increase the limit. The good news is that we already have planned complete modernization of &quot;Classic&quot; Outlook Add-in and we&#039;ll take your suggestion into account during our work :). I&#039;ll change the status to &quot;not now&quot;, but please keep in mind the above information.]]></description>
  816.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Michal Rykiert)]]></author>
  817.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/6499#msg-6591</guid>
  818.                <pubDate>Mon, 20 Jan 2025 16:44:30 +0100</pubDate>
  819.                            </item>
  820.                    <item>
  821.                
  822.                <title><![CDATA[Action - Add atachment to another workflow element + add database ID content]]></title>
  823.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/6477#msg-6590</link>
  824.                <description><![CDATA[Hi Krystian, your suggestion will be addressed at least partially by the User Defined API functionality that we&#039;re working on. So stay tuned for more information on that. As for now, for clarity, I&#039;ll label this thread as &quot;not now&quot;, but please keep in mind the above :)]]></description>
  825.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Michal Rykiert)]]></author>
  826.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/6477#msg-6590</guid>
  827.                <pubDate>Mon, 20 Jan 2025 16:40:20 +0100</pubDate>
  828.                            </item>
  829.                    <item>
  830.                
  831.                <title><![CDATA[Selectable display mode for chart detail level]]></title>
  832.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/6422#msg-6589</link>
  833.                <description><![CDATA[Straight into the backlog! :)]]></description>
  834.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Michal Rykiert)]]></author>
  835.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/6422#msg-6589</guid>
  836.                <pubDate>Mon, 20 Jan 2025 16:37:52 +0100</pubDate>
  837.                            </item>
  838.                    <item>
  839.                
  840.                <title><![CDATA[Widget from form in Report as MicroWidget - MicroChart]]></title>
  841.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/6421#msg-6588</link>
  842.                <description><![CDATA[Hi Ale, it&#039;s a nice suggestion, however right now given other development priorities, it falls into the &quot;nice-to-have&quot; category. Therefore, as for now we decide not to proceed further with your suggestion. We may re-visit it in the future.]]></description>
  843.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Michal Rykiert)]]></author>
  844.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/6421#msg-6588</guid>
  845.                <pubDate>Mon, 20 Jan 2025 16:36:44 +0100</pubDate>
  846.                            </item>
  847.                    <item>
  848.                
  849.                <title><![CDATA[Work in the context of an employee]]></title>
  850.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/6399#msg-6587</link>
  851.                <description><![CDATA[In such case, I&#039;m closing the thread :)]]></description>
  852.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Michal Rykiert)]]></author>
  853.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/6399#msg-6587</guid>
  854.                <pubDate>Mon, 20 Jan 2025 16:33:17 +0100</pubDate>
  855.                            </item>
  856.                    <item>
  857.                
  858.                <title><![CDATA[Extend Confirm/Alert form rule]]></title>
  859.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/6398#msg-6586</link>
  860.                <description><![CDATA[It lands straight into the backlog, I&#039;m changing the status accordingly.]]></description>
  861.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Michal Rykiert)]]></author>
  862.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/6398#msg-6586</guid>
  863.                <pubDate>Mon, 20 Jan 2025 16:31:27 +0100</pubDate>
  864.                            </item>
  865.                    <item>
  866.                
  867.                <title><![CDATA[WEBCON BPS 2025: Fluent 2 - density setting]]></title>
  868.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/6380#msg-6585</link>
  869.                <description><![CDATA[From the UX perspective I&#039;m all for it. However, there&#039;s also the development side and an associated cost/effort required. The latter is the largest obstacle, as we need to keep the whole UI consistent across all supported platforms, screen resolutions, sizes, ratios, etc. When it comes to systemic solutions (&quot;one button for everyone&quot;) it&#039;s most likely won&#039;t happen. However, it doesn&#039;t mean in the future you won&#039;t have more options to control the UI.For instance, we plan to introduce dashboard layout configuration based on a grid which is way more &quot;relaxed&quot; way of composing dashboard compared to the current options. Additionally, we also plan to offer more freedom for forms. That&#039;s all I can say at this point :)]]></description>
  870.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Michal Rykiert)]]></author>
  871.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/6380#msg-6585</guid>
  872.                <pubDate>Mon, 20 Jan 2025 16:29:22 +0100</pubDate>
  873.                            </item>
  874.                    <item>
  875.                
  876.                <title><![CDATA[Center the label name]]></title>
  877.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/6575#msg-6575</link>
  878.                <description><![CDATA[Hi,I don&#039;t know if this is possible in the BPS 2025 version, but for earlier versions I miss the ability to center the text (and make it bold) on request for each column of the item list or SQL GRID data table. I don&#039;t think it&#039;s possible to set the background color for the column label.Regards,D.]]></description>
  879.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Dariusz Tułacz)]]></author>
  880.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/6575#msg-6575</guid>
  881.                <pubDate>Sun, 19 Jan 2025 18:37:28 +0100</pubDate>
  882.                            </item>
  883.                    <item>
  884.                
  885.                <title><![CDATA[Application import: What if/ Run as test]]></title>
  886.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/6572#msg-6572</link>
  887.                <description><![CDATA[Hi,I&#039;m wondering whether it would be easy to add a &quot;What if&quot; /&quot; Run as test&quot; flag to the application import. This flag would execute the generate the report summary so that we can see what would be changed. I&#039;m currently restoring a backup of the production environment in the test environment  to execute the import, and see what would be updated.The reason for this is, that we are transporting an application to production. This application uses the centralized &quot;Action&quot; application which is used by most of the other applications on the environment. The worst part is, that I&#039;m not 100% sure, that nothing has changed in the Action application.  If something has changed, it may have been done in the context of a different application. Best regards,Daniel]]></description>
  888.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Daniel Krüger Cosmo Consult)]]></author>
  889.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/6572#msg-6572</guid>
  890.                <pubDate>Fri, 17 Jan 2025 12:40:48 +0100</pubDate>
  891.                            </item>
  892.                    <item>
  893.                
  894.                <title><![CDATA[Multiple lines of text as formatted editor not working?]]></title>
  895.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/6483#msg-6542</link>
  896.                <description><![CDATA[Hi Micha,I tried, but I wasn&#039;t able to replicate your issue. Let&#039;s see if others have encountered thisCheers,Dawid]]></description>
  897.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Dawid Porowski)]]></author>
  898.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/6483#msg-6542</guid>
  899.                <pubDate>Mon, 13 Jan 2025 09:37:09 +0100</pubDate>
  900.                            </item>
  901.                    <item>
  902.                
  903.                <title><![CDATA[Feature: Delete Row (Item List)]]></title>
  904.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/1739#msg-6530</link>
  905.                <description><![CDATA[I believe this was implemented in version 2023.]]></description>
  906.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Jarosław Dziekan)]]></author>
  907.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/1739#msg-6530</guid>
  908.                <pubDate>Fri, 10 Jan 2025 13:29:06 +0100</pubDate>
  909.                            </item>
  910.                    <item>
  911.                
  912.                <title><![CDATA[Would it be possible to have an iOS version of Designer Studio?]]></title>
  913.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/6526#msg-6526</link>
  914.                <description><![CDATA[Hi,we are 3 colleagues that use that use Designer Studio on a daily basis for more than a year now. Considering that our organization has only MAC workstations/laptops, would it be possible to port Designer Studio for iOS? At the moment we bypass this inconvenience by using Windows VMs or using 3rd party software like Parallels but it would be great not to have to pay for these additional resources.Best,Roman]]></description>
  915.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Roman from Romania)]]></author>
  916.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/6526#msg-6526</guid>
  917.                <pubDate>Fri, 10 Jan 2025 09:56:49 +0100</pubDate>
  918.                            </item>
  919.                    <item>
  920.                
  921.                <title><![CDATA[Support batch processing]]></title>
  922.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/6524#msg-6524</link>
  923.                <description><![CDATA[To improve the REST API and working with it, perhaps it is possible to introduce support for batch processing. I think it could help and speed up the work with field updates in many elements.https://www.odata.org/documentation/odata-version-3-0/batch-processing/]]></description>
  924.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Marcin Stachera - Marcopol)]]></author>
  925.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/6524#msg-6524</guid>
  926.                <pubDate>Thu, 09 Jan 2025 14:54:49 +0100</pubDate>
  927.                            </item>
  928.                    <item>
  929.                
  930.                <title><![CDATA[Global privilege level “application access”]]></title>
  931.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/6508#msg-6508</link>
  932.                <description><![CDATA[Hi,I think it would make sense to add to the global permissions the level access to applicationsCurrently, if we give a global level of, for example, permission to read all items it can be problematic to give permissions to the application per each application.This needs to be maintained and remembered.If there is a global level per item, it should also be global for the application.Regards.]]></description>
  933.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Karol Częczek)]]></author>
  934.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/6508#msg-6508</guid>
  935.                <pubDate>Wed, 08 Jan 2025 16:50:03 +0100</pubDate>
  936.                            </item>
  937.                    <item>
  938.                
  939.                <title><![CDATA[Option to revoke privileges after task completion]]></title>
  940.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/6213#msg-6502</link>
  941.                <description><![CDATA[Hi,It also requires just one global action template if i understood correctly - it&#039;s already possible, and shouldn&#039;t require much work to prepare.]]></description>
  942.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Maksymilian Stachowiak)]]></author>
  943.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/6213#msg-6502</guid>
  944.                <pubDate>Wed, 08 Jan 2025 15:30:55 +0100</pubDate>
  945.                            </item>
  946.                    <item>
  947.                
  948.                <title><![CDATA[Outlook Classic tile restriction]]></title>
  949.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/6499#msg-6499</link>
  950.                <description><![CDATA[There&#039;s  tile restriction in Outlook addin classic which doesn&#039;t allow to add more than 12 costum tiles.Is there any way to add more than 12 tiles? I&#039;m asking becouse this tool is used on daily besis by our costumers.]]></description>
  951.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Laviee)]]></author>
  952.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/6499#msg-6499</guid>
  953.                <pubDate>Wed, 08 Jan 2025 14:46:40 +0100</pubDate>
  954.                            </item>
  955.                    <item>
  956.                
  957.                <title><![CDATA[WEBCON BPS 2025: Fluent 2 - density setting]]></title>
  958.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/6380#msg-6490</link>
  959.                <description><![CDATA[Hi Adam,i support the requirement espacially to change the density because our application needs plenty of more space on the screen than in former versions. I posted an IMAGE with the 2 examples in the following thread. https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/6488Regards from germany]]></description>
  960.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Gerd)]]></author>
  961.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/6380#msg-6490</guid>
  962.                <pubDate>Tue, 07 Jan 2025 13:08:35 +0100</pubDate>
  963.                            </item>
  964.                    <item>
  965.                
  966.                <title><![CDATA[Multiple lines of text as formatted editor not working?]]></title>
  967.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/6483#msg-6483</link>
  968.                <description><![CDATA[I&#039;ve just found out that when I switch multiple lines of text field from the standard type to formatted it just disapears and there is a type error with no furter explanation. Is it just in my case or is it common in the latest version?]]></description>
  969.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Michał Ludwiczak)]]></author>
  970.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/6483#msg-6483</guid>
  971.                <pubDate>Fri, 03 Jan 2025 15:56:46 +0100</pubDate>
  972.                            </item>
  973.                    <item>
  974.                
  975.                <title><![CDATA[Constants - add info is always treated as TEXT or add set type]]></title>
  976.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5961#msg-6482</link>
  977.                <description><![CDATA[Finally the help ... Helps. Thank you.]]></description>
  978.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Paweł Tołoczko)]]></author>
  979.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5961#msg-6482</guid>
  980.                <pubDate>Fri, 03 Jan 2025 12:33:57 +0100</pubDate>
  981.                            </item>
  982.                    <item>
  983.                
  984.                <title><![CDATA[Constants - add info is always treated as TEXT or add set type]]></title>
  985.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5961#msg-6481</link>
  986.                <description><![CDATA[Pawe, we&#039;ve improved the description of constants in the documentation. Let me know if it helps.]]></description>
  987.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Michal Rykiert)]]></author>
  988.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5961#msg-6481</guid>
  989.                <pubDate>Fri, 03 Jan 2025 10:23:22 +0100</pubDate>
  990.                            </item>
  991.                    <item>
  992.                
  993.                <title><![CDATA[Action - Add atachment to another workflow element + add database ID content]]></title>
  994.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/6477#msg-6477</link>
  995.                <description><![CDATA[In the 2025 version, a new feature was added to allow transferring an attachment to another item with the ability to specify the Workflow ID. This functionality operates within the context of the current database.  **Proposal for enhancement:** Extend this functionality to include the ability to specify the Content database ID where the Workflow ID is being referenced.  This enhancement would be useful for transferring attachments across multiple Content databases, where processes are divided to improve system scalability. Currently, this can be achieved using the API, but if we want to transfer and delete the attachment simultaneously, two actions are required: using the REST API for transfer and a separate action to delete the attachment.]]></description>
  996.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Krystian Golik)]]></author>
  997.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/6477#msg-6477</guid>
  998.                <pubDate>Tue, 31 Dec 2024 16:14:16 +0100</pubDate>
  999.                            </item>
  1000.                    <item>
  1001.                
  1002.                <title><![CDATA[Extend Confirm/Alert form rule]]></title>
  1003.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/6398#msg-6423</link>
  1004.                <description><![CDATA[This will be grate like in for ex. in VBA:https://learn.microsoft.com/pl-pl/office/vba/language/reference/user-interface-help/msgbox-functionSyntaxMsgBox (prompt, [ buttons, ] [ title, ] [ helpfile, context ])for:helpfile ]]></description>
  1005.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Paweł Tołoczko)]]></author>
  1006.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/6398#msg-6423</guid>
  1007.                <pubDate>Mon, 16 Dec 2024 09:10:58 +0100</pubDate>
  1008.                            </item>
  1009.                    <item>
  1010.                
  1011.                <title><![CDATA[Selectable display mode for chart detail level]]></title>
  1012.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/6422#msg-6422</link>
  1013.                <description><![CDATA[Hi, if we have a chart with a detail level, you can click on a chart element to see the elements, these information are displayed as tiles. At least if the chart is located in a row set to  &quot;one-third column&quot; and the chart is located in the smaller part.It would be great if we could also define the display mode of a report for a chart. This display mode would be applied to the detail level of the chart. This would allow us to get a better overview even if the number of columns is limited.Best regards,Daniel]]></description>
  1014.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Daniel Krüger Cosmo Consult)]]></author>
  1015.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/6422#msg-6422</guid>
  1016.                <pubDate>Mon, 16 Dec 2024 08:04:29 +0100</pubDate>
  1017.                            </item>
  1018.                    <item>
  1019.                
  1020.                <title><![CDATA[Widget from form in Report as MicroWidget - MicroChart]]></title>
  1021.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/6421#msg-6421</link>
  1022.                <description><![CDATA[A nice add-on feature to reports would be If we could use the widget field directly in the report table. By this users could benefit from viewing rich info widgets directly from report to check the whole project portfolio health for instance.]]></description>
  1023.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Aleš Jurak)]]></author>
  1024.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/6421#msg-6421</guid>
  1025.                <pubDate>Sun, 15 Dec 2024 19:14:10 +0100</pubDate>
  1026.                            </item>
  1027.                    <item>
  1028.                
  1029.                <title><![CDATA[Work in the context of an employee]]></title>
  1030.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/6399#msg-6414</link>
  1031.                <description><![CDATA[Daniel,you are right, the permissions are adjusted and the replacement module solves my need.Thanks!]]></description>
  1032.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Dariusz Tułacz)]]></author>
  1033.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/6399#msg-6414</guid>
  1034.                <pubDate>Fri, 13 Dec 2024 10:12:53 +0100</pubDate>
  1035.                            </item>
  1036.                    <item>
  1037.                
  1038.                <title><![CDATA[Work in the context of an employee]]></title>
  1039.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/6399#msg-6404</link>
  1040.                <description><![CDATA[With system administrator/business administrator privileges, we have the highest privileges. When setting a replacement for an employee with less privileges, we do not need to check what he sees, because we will still see everything that comes out of the administrator&#039;s privileges. I&#039;m not talking about working as user -&gt; user, but about working as an administrator -&gt; user.]]></description>
  1041.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Dariusz Tułacz)]]></author>
  1042.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/6399#msg-6404</guid>
  1043.                <pubDate>Thu, 12 Dec 2024 10:26:05 +0100</pubDate>
  1044.                            </item>
  1045.                    <item>
  1046.                
  1047.                <title><![CDATA[Work in the context of an employee]]></title>
  1048.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/6399#msg-6402</link>
  1049.                <description><![CDATA[Hi Dariusz,are you using a version &lt; 2022? In 2022 &quot;Working on behalf&quot; was added and I&#039;m really glad is has been added :)https://community.webcon.com/posts/post/substitutions-on-behalf/307/17Best regards,Daniel]]></description>
  1050.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Daniel Krüger Cosmo Consult)]]></author>
  1051.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/6399#msg-6402</guid>
  1052.                <pubDate>Wed, 11 Dec 2024 18:03:48 +0100</pubDate>
  1053.                            </item>
  1054.                    <item>
  1055.                
  1056.                <title><![CDATA[Work in the context of an employee]]></title>
  1057.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/6399#msg-6399</link>
  1058.                <description><![CDATA[Hi,I think it would be great if we could switch from the BPS Portal to the user&#039;s account and check what he sees on the form and reports. The system and business (global) administrator would have such privileges. From the BPS Portal level, he could use the icon to switch to any user&#039;s account (administrative mode). Sometimes data source values are filtered and there is no way to see what the user actually sees.Regards,D.]]></description>
  1059.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Dariusz Tułacz)]]></author>
  1060.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/6399#msg-6399</guid>
  1061.                <pubDate>Wed, 11 Dec 2024 11:30:56 +0100</pubDate>
  1062.                            </item>
  1063.                    <item>
  1064.                
  1065.                <title><![CDATA[Extend Confirm/Alert form rule]]></title>
  1066.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/6398#msg-6398</link>
  1067.                <description><![CDATA[Hi,the &quot;new&quot; confirm/alert functions are really great and please don&#039;t remove the option to pass HTML as a parameter. :)Yet there&#039;s always room for improvement. Could we get additional/optional parameter for the title, yes and no button?Depending on the context the labels &quot;Confirmation&quot;, &quot;Yes&quot; and &quot;No&quot; may not be the best.For example this would be the default labelsTitle: ConfirmationText: If you progress, this will trigger the deletion of  xyzButtons Yes, NoThis would be an alternative using the suggested parametersTitle: Delete everything?Text: If you progress, this will trigger the deletion of  xyzButtons Yes, I know what I&#039;m doing ; Cancel the actionBest regards,Daniel Best regards,Daniel]]></description>
  1068.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Daniel Krüger Cosmo Consult)]]></author>
  1069.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/6398#msg-6398</guid>
  1070.                <pubDate>Wed, 11 Dec 2024 11:14:23 +0100</pubDate>
  1071.                            </item>
  1072.                    <item>
  1073.                
  1074.                <title><![CDATA[Replace attachments icons]]></title>
  1075.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/6336#msg-6385</link>
  1076.                <description><![CDATA[That&#039;s the spirit! :)]]></description>
  1077.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Martin Meze Freelancer)]]></author>
  1078.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/6336#msg-6385</guid>
  1079.                <pubDate>Tue, 10 Dec 2024 16:05:47 +0100</pubDate>
  1080.                            </item>
  1081.                    <item>
  1082.                
  1083.                <title><![CDATA[Replace attachments icons]]></title>
  1084.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/6336#msg-6384</link>
  1085.                <description><![CDATA[Will do. Straight to the backlog.]]></description>
  1086.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Michal Rykiert)]]></author>
  1087.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/6336#msg-6384</guid>
  1088.                <pubDate>Tue, 10 Dec 2024 15:47:59 +0100</pubDate>
  1089.                            </item>
  1090.                    <item>
  1091.                
  1092.                <title><![CDATA[Replacing a user]]></title>
  1093.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/6327#msg-6383</link>
  1094.                <description><![CDATA[It&#039;s not easy, but we&#039;ll look into it. I&#039;m changing the status to &quot;under review&quot;]]></description>
  1095.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Michal Rykiert)]]></author>
  1096.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/6327#msg-6383</guid>
  1097.                <pubDate>Tue, 10 Dec 2024 15:47:07 +0100</pubDate>
  1098.                            </item>
  1099.                    <item>
  1100.                
  1101.                <title><![CDATA[[Retracted] Unique field value for form type optionally per business entity]]></title>
  1102.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/6326#msg-6382</link>
  1103.                <description><![CDATA[Since there&#039;s an update and solution, I&#039;m closing the thread.]]></description>
  1104.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Michal Rykiert)]]></author>
  1105.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/6326#msg-6382</guid>
  1106.                <pubDate>Tue, 10 Dec 2024 15:46:14 +0100</pubDate>
  1107.                            </item>
  1108.                    <item>
  1109.                
  1110.                <title><![CDATA[Extension of Authorization of Access to Form Fields for attachments]]></title>
  1111.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/6268#msg-6381</link>
  1112.                <description><![CDATA[Right now we&#039;re not planning any major modifications into the permission system. We might re-visit this thread should more similar requests appear.]]></description>
  1113.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Michal Rykiert)]]></author>
  1114.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/6268#msg-6381</guid>
  1115.                <pubDate>Tue, 10 Dec 2024 15:45:22 +0100</pubDate>
  1116.                            </item>
  1117.                    <item>
  1118.                
  1119.                <title><![CDATA[WEBCON BPS 2025: Fluent 2 - density setting]]></title>
  1120.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/6380#msg-6380</link>
  1121.                <description><![CDATA[Dear Community, The new Fluent 2 interface is undoubtedly a significant step forward in design and usability. However, I believe theres room for further refinement to enhance user experience. One suggestion would be introducing a customizable density setting, similar to the Roomy, Cozy, and Compact options available in Outlook.Such a feature could prove especially beneficial on devices with smaller screens, like laptops. For instance, in scenarios where a form is open with the details panel visible, reducing the spacing between workflow steps could help optimize the available screen space.Allowing users to set their preferred density could influence multiple elements of the interface, such as:Spacing between form fields.The layout of the left and top menus.The arrangement within the details panel (info panel).Additionally, this setting might also adjust font sizes in specific areas, like field group headers, the attachments section, and comments titles, ensuring a cohesive and user-friendly experience across different density preferences.Your feedback and thoughts on this suggestion are more than welcome!Best.]]></description>
  1122.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Adam Hatak)]]></author>
  1123.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/6380#msg-6380</guid>
  1124.                <pubDate>Tue, 10 Dec 2024 15:45:00 +0100</pubDate>
  1125.                            </item>
  1126.                    <item>
  1127.                
  1128.                <title><![CDATA[WEBCON BPS 2025: Highlight  Edit button like the Cancel editing]]></title>
  1129.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/6267#msg-6379</link>
  1130.                <description><![CDATA[We&#039;ll do it :). Straight to backlog!]]></description>
  1131.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Michal Rykiert)]]></author>
  1132.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/6267#msg-6379</guid>
  1133.                <pubDate>Tue, 10 Dec 2024 15:44:06 +0100</pubDate>
  1134.                            </item>
  1135.                    <item>
  1136.                
  1137.                <title><![CDATA[Improvements for handling large forms (many fields)]]></title>
  1138.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/6265#msg-6378</link>
  1139.                <description><![CDATA[We&#039;ll address your scenario alongside other form-related project in the future. I&#039;m labeling the thread as &quot;not now&quot;, but stay tuned to updates about forms :)]]></description>
  1140.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Michal Rykiert)]]></author>
  1141.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/6265#msg-6378</guid>
  1142.                <pubDate>Tue, 10 Dec 2024 15:43:17 +0100</pubDate>
  1143.                            </item>
  1144.                    <item>
  1145.                
  1146.                <title><![CDATA[JavaScript function to create a field instance]]></title>
  1147.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/6264#msg-6377</link>
  1148.                <description><![CDATA[We&#039;re working on introduction of &quot;task forms&quot; that should address your scenario. So as such, I&#039;ll label your thread as &quot;not now&quot;, but keep in mind the solution should come from a slightly different angle :)]]></description>
  1149.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Michal Rykiert)]]></author>
  1150.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/6264#msg-6377</guid>
  1151.                <pubDate>Tue, 10 Dec 2024 15:41:20 +0100</pubDate>
  1152.                            </item>
  1153.                    <item>
  1154.                
  1155.                <title><![CDATA[Dashboard - Collapsible report toolbar bar]]></title>
  1156.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/6263#msg-6376</link>
  1157.                <description><![CDATA[Sounds good -&gt; backlog :).]]></description>
  1158.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Michal Rykiert)]]></author>
  1159.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/6263#msg-6376</guid>
  1160.                <pubDate>Tue, 10 Dec 2024 15:39:24 +0100</pubDate>
  1161.                            </item>
  1162.                    <item>
  1163.                
  1164.                <title><![CDATA[Dashboard Report tile improvements]]></title>
  1165.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/6262#msg-6375</link>
  1166.                <description><![CDATA[This option will be enabled alongside with introducation of grid-based placement within dashboards.]]></description>
  1167.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Michal Rykiert)]]></author>
  1168.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/6262#msg-6375</guid>
  1169.                <pubDate>Tue, 10 Dec 2024 15:38:01 +0100</pubDate>
  1170.                            </item>
  1171.                    <item>
  1172.                
  1173.                <title><![CDATA[Adding support for field name placement:  above for old fields]]></title>
  1174.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/6261#msg-6374</link>
  1175.                <description><![CDATA[We&#039;ll take it into the account along with other form-related development project. I&#039;m putting it into the backlog.]]></description>
  1176.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Michal Rykiert)]]></author>
  1177.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/6261#msg-6374</guid>
  1178.                <pubDate>Tue, 10 Dec 2024 15:36:32 +0100</pubDate>
  1179.                            </item>
  1180.                    <item>
  1181.                
  1182.                <title><![CDATA[BPS 2025: Ideas for navigation with multilingual elements]]></title>
  1183.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/6235#msg-6373</link>
  1184.                <description><![CDATA[Right now these kind of changes are out of our horizon, although we may re-visit the idea given more voices like yours are raised.]]></description>
  1185.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Michal Rykiert)]]></author>
  1186.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/6235#msg-6373</guid>
  1187.                <pubDate>Tue, 10 Dec 2024 15:35:17 +0100</pubDate>
  1188.                            </item>
  1189.                    <item>
  1190.                
  1191.                <title><![CDATA[BPS 2025: Popup search should focus on input instead of the close button]]></title>
  1192.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/6215#msg-6372</link>
  1193.                <description><![CDATA[We&#039;ll fix it :). Straight to the backlog!]]></description>
  1194.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Michal Rykiert)]]></author>
  1195.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/6215#msg-6372</guid>
  1196.                <pubDate>Tue, 10 Dec 2024 15:33:16 +0100</pubDate>
  1197.                            </item>
  1198.                    <item>
  1199.                
  1200.                <title><![CDATA[Exclude process/form type from SOLR search index]]></title>
  1201.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/6214#msg-6371</link>
  1202.                <description><![CDATA[We understand the idea, but after consideration there are many more things with higher priority. Therefore I&#039;m changing the status to &quot;not now&quot;.]]></description>
  1203.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Michal Rykiert)]]></author>
  1204.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/6214#msg-6371</guid>
  1205.                <pubDate>Tue, 10 Dec 2024 15:32:35 +0100</pubDate>
  1206.                            </item>
  1207.                    <item>
  1208.                
  1209.                <title><![CDATA[Option to revoke privileges after task completion]]></title>
  1210.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/6213#msg-6369</link>
  1211.                <description><![CDATA[As for now we&#039;re not planning any changes to the priviliges, so I&#039;m changing the status to &quot;not now.]]></description>
  1212.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Michal Rykiert)]]></author>
  1213.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/6213#msg-6369</guid>
  1214.                <pubDate>Tue, 10 Dec 2024 15:30:15 +0100</pubDate>
  1215.                            </item>
  1216.                    <item>
  1217.                
  1218.                <title><![CDATA[Unique value of the item list column]]></title>
  1219.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/6212#msg-6368</link>
  1220.                <description><![CDATA[Due to the complexity of item list management under the hood and other development priorities, we need to put it to the backburner for now.]]></description>
  1221.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Michal Rykiert)]]></author>
  1222.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/6212#msg-6368</guid>
  1223.                <pubDate>Tue, 10 Dec 2024 15:28:17 +0100</pubDate>
  1224.                            </item>
  1225.                    <item>
  1226.                
  1227.                <title><![CDATA[Confirmation of Process Cloning]]></title>
  1228.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/6204#msg-6366</link>
  1229.                <description><![CDATA[Good point. I&#039;m putting it straight into to the backlog.]]></description>
  1230.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Michal Rykiert)]]></author>
  1231.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/6204#msg-6366</guid>
  1232.                <pubDate>Tue, 10 Dec 2024 15:26:00 +0100</pubDate>
  1233.                            </item>
  1234.                    <item>
  1235.                
  1236.                <title><![CDATA[BPS 2025: No margin for HTML fields]]></title>
  1237.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/6197#msg-6365</link>
  1238.                <description><![CDATA[We&#039;ll look into it closer. I&#039;m changing the status accordingly.]]></description>
  1239.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Michal Rykiert)]]></author>
  1240.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/6197#msg-6365</guid>
  1241.                <pubDate>Tue, 10 Dec 2024 15:24:05 +0100</pubDate>
  1242.                            </item>
  1243.                    <item>
  1244.                
  1245.                <title><![CDATA[Duplication of attachments in the database]]></title>
  1246.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/6172#msg-6364</link>
  1247.                <description><![CDATA[Since the answer was provided and there&#039;s no further questions, I assume we can close this thread.]]></description>
  1248.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Michal Rykiert)]]></author>
  1249.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/6172#msg-6364</guid>
  1250.                <pubDate>Tue, 10 Dec 2024 15:21:55 +0100</pubDate>
  1251.                            </item>
  1252.                    <item>
  1253.                
  1254.                <title><![CDATA[Environment setting to disable: Timeout actions error: checkout exception occurred]]></title>
  1255.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5248#msg-6349</link>
  1256.                <description><![CDATA[Hi Micha,maybe this topic can be revisited, due to this change in WEBCON BPS 2025:https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/6348Best regards,Daniel]]></description>
  1257.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Daniel Krüger Cosmo Consult)]]></author>
  1258.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5248#msg-6349</guid>
  1259.                <pubDate>Fri, 06 Dec 2024 12:32:40 +0100</pubDate>
  1260.                            </item>
  1261.                    <item>
  1262.                
  1263.                <title><![CDATA[Replace attachments icons]]></title>
  1264.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/6336#msg-6336</link>
  1265.                <description><![CDATA[Hi! Any chance you replace the old (PNG) icons shown in the attachments area with the new (SVG) ones (as in the attached image) and reduce the size from 42px to 32px?]]></description>
  1266.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Martin Meze Freelancer)]]></author>
  1267.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/6336#msg-6336</guid>
  1268.                <pubDate>Wed, 04 Dec 2024 13:15:06 +0100</pubDate>
  1269.                            </item>
  1270.                    <item>
  1271.                
  1272.                <title><![CDATA[Replacing a user]]></title>
  1273.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/6327#msg-6335</link>
  1274.                <description><![CDATA[Hi,if the user is no longer active/synchronized, you can add the user as a BPS external user using the old account name. :)Best regards,Daniel]]></description>
  1275.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Daniel Krüger Cosmo Consult)]]></author>
  1276.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/6327#msg-6335</guid>
  1277.                <pubDate>Tue, 03 Dec 2024 20:24:29 +0100</pubDate>
  1278.                            </item>
  1279.                    <item>
  1280.                
  1281.                <title><![CDATA[Replacing a user]]></title>
  1282.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/6327#msg-6331</link>
  1283.                <description><![CDATA[HIHave you tried the permission migration option.?The condition is that the user must be active in ADRegards.]]></description>
  1284.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Karol Częczek)]]></author>
  1285.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/6327#msg-6331</guid>
  1286.                <pubDate>Tue, 03 Dec 2024 17:44:31 +0100</pubDate>
  1287.                            </item>
  1288.                    <item>
  1289.                
  1290.                <title><![CDATA[Replacing a user]]></title>
  1291.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/6327#msg-6327</link>
  1292.                <description><![CDATA[HelloI have a question. Is it possible to replace a user in webcon with another one, i.e. I have an account xxx@domain.com and I would like everything that was and is on the account xxx@domain.com to be assigned to the new account yyy@domain.comThank you in advance]]></description>
  1293.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (User)]]></author>
  1294.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/6327#msg-6327</guid>
  1295.                <pubDate>Tue, 03 Dec 2024 11:38:54 +0100</pubDate>
  1296.                            </item>
  1297.                    <item>
  1298.                
  1299.                <title><![CDATA[[Retracted] Unique field value for form type optionally per business entity]]></title>
  1300.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/6326#msg-6326</link>
  1301.                <description><![CDATA[Hi,I&#039;m just configuring my xx  validation action in which I check whether a field value is unique for the given form type. Sometimes I include the business entity and sometimes I ignore it.It would be great, if this could be standard feature. :)Related user voice: Unique value of the item list column https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/6212/15Best regards,Daniel*Edit*While implementing  the check I figured, that there&#039;s no general option to implement this. There are to many conditions. Nevertheless we can create something similar using a global business rule:https://daniels-notes.de/posts/2024/is-field-value-unique]]></description>
  1302.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Daniel Krüger Cosmo Consult)]]></author>
  1303.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/6326#msg-6326</guid>
  1304.                <pubDate>Tue, 03 Dec 2024 07:22:49 +0100</pubDate>
  1305.                            </item>
  1306.                    <item>
  1307.                
  1308.                <title><![CDATA[Autocomplete: Support for HTML in Popup]]></title>
  1309.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5772#msg-6323</link>
  1310.                <description><![CDATA[Update: we decided not to proceed further with this idea. We may re-visit it during other UI-related projects.]]></description>
  1311.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Michal Rykiert)]]></author>
  1312.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5772#msg-6323</guid>
  1313.                <pubDate>Mon, 02 Dec 2024 16:01:19 +0100</pubDate>
  1314.                            </item>
  1315.                    <item>
  1316.                
  1317.                <title><![CDATA[Tool tip for path description - HTML tags acceptation]]></title>
  1318.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5558#msg-6322</link>
  1319.                <description><![CDATA[Short update: we had a recent decision about not extending the tooltip functionality, so I&#039;m changing the status accordingly.]]></description>
  1320.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Michal Rykiert)]]></author>
  1321.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5558#msg-6322</guid>
  1322.                <pubDate>Mon, 02 Dec 2024 15:59:32 +0100</pubDate>
  1323.                            </item>
  1324.                    <item>
  1325.                
  1326.                <title><![CDATA[Replacement for - email notification]]></title>
  1327.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/6296#msg-6321</link>
  1328.                <description><![CDATA[Good idea, we&#039;ll work on it :).I&#039;m changing the status to &quot;in backlog&quot;]]></description>
  1329.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Michal Rykiert)]]></author>
  1330.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/6296#msg-6321</guid>
  1331.                <pubDate>Mon, 02 Dec 2024 15:57:15 +0100</pubDate>
  1332.                            </item>
  1333.                    <item>
  1334.                
  1335.                <title><![CDATA[WEBCON BPS 2025: Phases/actors  available in reports]]></title>
  1336.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/6291#msg-6320</link>
  1337.                <description><![CDATA[Agreed. It goes straight into the backlog and you should expect results fairly soon :).]]></description>
  1338.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Michal Rykiert)]]></author>
  1339.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/6291#msg-6320</guid>
  1340.                <pubDate>Mon, 02 Dec 2024 15:55:46 +0100</pubDate>
  1341.                            </item>
  1342.                    <item>
  1343.                
  1344.                <title><![CDATA[Archived instances: Better integration in the Advanced Analytics Framework and the global system search]]></title>
  1345.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/6171#msg-6319</link>
  1346.                <description><![CDATA[Well, it&#039;s a good idea, and at the same time quite a complex functionality to implement as it requires some fundamental changes to the archiving mechanisms. With that said, I&#039;m changing the status to &quot;under review&quot;, although I can say upfront it may take us a good while before we proceed with the next steps.]]></description>
  1347.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Michal Rykiert)]]></author>
  1348.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/6171#msg-6319</guid>
  1349.                <pubDate>Mon, 02 Dec 2024 15:54:41 +0100</pubDate>
  1350.                            </item>
  1351.                    <item>
  1352.                
  1353.                <title><![CDATA[Floating group option]]></title>
  1354.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/6105#msg-6318</link>
  1355.                <description><![CDATA[After analysis we decided other functionalities will be prioritized. With that said, we may re-visit the idea in the future.]]></description>
  1356.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Michal Rykiert)]]></author>
  1357.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/6105#msg-6318</guid>
  1358.                <pubDate>Mon, 02 Dec 2024 15:50:12 +0100</pubDate>
  1359.                            </item>
  1360.                    <item>
  1361.                
  1362.                <title><![CDATA[Managing the view / layout of attributes in a group]]></title>
  1363.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/6102#msg-6317</link>
  1364.                <description><![CDATA[On top of the horizontal layout of fields on the form, there&#039;s an option to wrap them. With that said, we&#039;re not planning on extending the capabilities of the horizontal layout at this point since it potentially impacts the display of the system on various devices and in various sizes.]]></description>
  1365.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Michal Rykiert)]]></author>
  1366.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/6102#msg-6317</guid>
  1367.                <pubDate>Mon, 02 Dec 2024 15:37:11 +0100</pubDate>
  1368.                            </item>
  1369.                    <item>
  1370.                
  1371.                <title><![CDATA[UI / UX improvements]]></title>
  1372.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/6060#msg-6316</link>
  1373.                <description><![CDATA[Hi Dawid,Many of the improvements you listed will be introduced in 2025.1. As for the rest (mainly search-related), it&#039;s not something we&#039;re able to do in the nearest future.]]></description>
  1374.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Michal Rykiert)]]></author>
  1375.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/6060#msg-6316</guid>
  1376.                <pubDate>Mon, 02 Dec 2024 15:30:49 +0100</pubDate>
  1377.                            </item>
  1378.                    <item>
  1379.                
  1380.                <title><![CDATA[Expanding the User Update API with Additional Synchronization Data]]></title>
  1381.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/6021#msg-6315</link>
  1382.                <description><![CDATA[Let us see what others think about it. Please give a thumbs up if you need this as well.]]></description>
  1383.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Michal Rykiert)]]></author>
  1384.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/6021#msg-6315</guid>
  1385.                <pubDate>Mon, 02 Dec 2024 15:27:26 +0100</pubDate>
  1386.                            </item>
  1387.                    <item>
  1388.                
  1389.                <title><![CDATA[Installation and launching of Designer Studio from the browser can be done independently]]></title>
  1390.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/6007#msg-6314</link>
  1391.                <description><![CDATA[Since Daniel has presented a good solution to the problem, I&#039;m closing the thread. Thanks Daniel :)]]></description>
  1392.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Michal Rykiert)]]></author>
  1393.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/6007#msg-6314</guid>
  1394.                <pubDate>Mon, 02 Dec 2024 15:26:05 +0100</pubDate>
  1395.                            </item>
  1396.                    <item>
  1397.                
  1398.                <title><![CDATA[Description field to describe purpose of adding substitution]]></title>
  1399.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5991#msg-6313</link>
  1400.                <description><![CDATA[That&#039;s a good idea. We could also use the field content for notification purposes. It goes straight into backlog.]]></description>
  1401.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Michal Rykiert)]]></author>
  1402.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5991#msg-6313</guid>
  1403.                <pubDate>Mon, 02 Dec 2024 15:24:31 +0100</pubDate>
  1404.                            </item>
  1405.                    <item>
  1406.                
  1407.                <title><![CDATA[Unifying the visibility of list columns on reports]]></title>
  1408.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5982#msg-6312</link>
  1409.                <description><![CDATA[Noted. We&#039;ll verify the feasibilty against other projects. I&#039;m changing the status to &quot;under review&quot;]]></description>
  1410.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Michal Rykiert)]]></author>
  1411.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5982#msg-6312</guid>
  1412.                <pubDate>Mon, 02 Dec 2024 15:22:38 +0100</pubDate>
  1413.                            </item>
  1414.                    <item>
  1415.                
  1416.                <title><![CDATA[JavaScript function to create a field instance]]></title>
  1417.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/6264#msg-6308</link>
  1418.                <description><![CDATA[Similar to my user voice https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/228 from February 2021 which is tagged as Under Review for a while.The possibility of using fields in custom dialogs would increase the user experience in many perspectives. The most flexible approach is likely a JavaScript based one as you describe.On the other hand, a configurable, generic way comparable to the mass actions on reports would be easier to use for those users with less experience in the usage of JavaScript.I&#039;m up for any solution, as long we don&#039;t have to wait for too long.]]></description>
  1419.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Markus Jenni)]]></author>
  1420.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/6264#msg-6308</guid>
  1421.                <pubDate>Fri, 29 Nov 2024 20:17:48 +0100</pubDate>
  1422.                            </item>
  1423.                    <item>
  1424.                
  1425.                <title><![CDATA[Replacement for - email notification]]></title>
  1426.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/6296#msg-6296</link>
  1427.                <description><![CDATA[Hi, I think it would be good to add the functionality of sending an email to the replacement person (checkbox). We do not always set up a replacement in the HR process where we can send an e-mail notification. By doing this via the BPS Portal, we are unable to notify the replacement person that they have received this honor :)Best regards, D.]]></description>
  1428.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Dariusz Tułacz)]]></author>
  1429.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/6296#msg-6296</guid>
  1430.                <pubDate>Thu, 28 Nov 2024 10:53:12 +0100</pubDate>
  1431.                            </item>
  1432.                    <item>
  1433.                
  1434.                <title><![CDATA[WEBCON BPS 2025: Phases/actors  available in reports]]></title>
  1435.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/6291#msg-6291</link>
  1436.                <description><![CDATA[Hi everyone,it would really be nice if we could display /filter the phases /actors in the reports.Best regards,Daniel]]></description>
  1437.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Daniel Krüger Cosmo Consult)]]></author>
  1438.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/6291#msg-6291</guid>
  1439.                <pubDate>Wed, 27 Nov 2024 10:32:16 +0100</pubDate>
  1440.                            </item>
  1441.                    <item>
  1442.                
  1443.                <title><![CDATA[Extension of Authorization of Access to Form Fields for attachments]]></title>
  1444.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/6268#msg-6268</link>
  1445.                <description><![CDATA[I would be nice, if this mechanism described in https://webcon.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/WEBCON_BPS_2025_Release_Notes_EN-1.pdf dedicated to increase security will be also available for attachments. Usually sensitive data included on the form is also in attachments.Apart from this functionality, it would be useful to be able to define permissions for individual attachments separate from document permissions, with the possibility of inheriting them from document permissions (as is currently).]]></description>
  1446.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Jacek)]]></author>
  1447.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/6268#msg-6268</guid>
  1448.                <pubDate>Mon, 25 Nov 2024 14:42:48 +0100</pubDate>
  1449.                            </item>
  1450.                    <item>
  1451.                
  1452.                <title><![CDATA[WEBCON BPS 2025: Highlight  Edit button like the Cancel editing]]></title>
  1453.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/6267#msg-6267</link>
  1454.                <description><![CDATA[Hi, we got the feedback in the past that the users sometimes don&#039;t recognize the Edit button. In WEBCON BPS the &quot;Cancel editing&quot; button is really prominent. Could we get the same design for the Edit button?I&#039;m also wondering whether the &quot;Cancel editing&quot; should be displayed in as it is. In my opinion the cancel editing is not the primary action a use should take on the form.Best regards,Daniel]]></description>
  1455.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Daniel Krüger Cosmo Consult)]]></author>
  1456.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/6267#msg-6267</guid>
  1457.                <pubDate>Mon, 25 Nov 2024 10:19:10 +0100</pubDate>
  1458.                            </item>
  1459.                    <item>
  1460.                
  1461.                <title><![CDATA[Improvements for handling large forms (many fields)]]></title>
  1462.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/6265#msg-6266</link>
  1463.                <description><![CDATA[I had an idea how we can use the CRM style layout right now. What do you think?https://daniels-notes.de/posts/2024/dynamics-crm-style-tabs]]></description>
  1464.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Daniel Krüger Cosmo Consult)]]></author>
  1465.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/6265#msg-6266</guid>
  1466.                <pubDate>Mon, 25 Nov 2024 07:26:17 +0100</pubDate>
  1467.                            </item>
  1468.                    <item>
  1469.                
  1470.                <title><![CDATA[Improvements for handling large forms (many fields)]]></title>
  1471.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/6265#msg-6265</link>
  1472.                <description><![CDATA[Hi, if you have a large form with numerous tabs because of to many fields the tab names may become unreadable in BPS 2025 on a desktop pc with 1980x resolution. This could be a little bit improved, if we could render the tabs not only horizontally but also vertically. The question would be whether to display the content of the tab between the current and the next tab or at the end of the tabs.Of course, there could be even other solutions to this, like how it is done in CRM where the &quot;Tabs&quot; are the top and the &quot;left an right panel&quot; are rendered. In Business central we can define &quot;groups&quot; in which we can display important and less important information. If a group is collapsed &quot;promoted&quot; fields are displayed.I will attach a few screenshots from other systems. Maybe other can share there ideas, too.Best regards,Daniel]]></description>
  1473.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Daniel Krüger Cosmo Consult)]]></author>
  1474.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/6265#msg-6265</guid>
  1475.                <pubDate>Sun, 24 Nov 2024 14:52:10 +0100</pubDate>
  1476.                            </item>
  1477.                    <item>
  1478.                
  1479.                <title><![CDATA[JavaScript function to create a field instance]]></title>
  1480.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/6264#msg-6264</link>
  1481.                <description><![CDATA[Hi,this idea is surely not for the typical WEBCON user but I think everyone of the partners has run into at least one use case where the standard form layout is not enough. Sometime because of some specific requirements or where we wanted to provide additional options to guide the users through a large form.I also tried and failed creating an &quot;advanced validation dialog&quot;. I wanted to display a dialog in which the user had to set some fields. I mainly failed because I couldn&#039;t replicate the logic attached to the choose fields and similar.Therefore I would think we could improve the user experience in some cases if we would have a JavaScript function which would  have parameters for- field name - parent HTML element- label HTML element.If this is the customer DOMThe function would be called like thisCreateField(&quot;AttChoose1&quot;,document.getElementById(&quot;myCustomFieldContainer&quot;),document.getElementById(&quot;myCustomFieldLabelContainer&quot;)and it would create the minimal elements required for the field to be working inside the container:I would &quot;expect&quot; that regular expressions, style and behavior, popup search, auto complete etc. are working. If the field is hidden either by a visibility restriction or a form rule the myCustomFieldContainer element would be empty.Best regards,Daniel]]></description>
  1482.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Daniel Krüger Cosmo Consult)]]></author>
  1483.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/6264#msg-6264</guid>
  1484.                <pubDate>Sun, 24 Nov 2024 14:38:49 +0100</pubDate>
  1485.                            </item>
  1486.                    <item>
  1487.                
  1488.                <title><![CDATA[Dashboard - Collapsible report toolbar bar]]></title>
  1489.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/6263#msg-6263</link>
  1490.                <description><![CDATA[Hi,what do you think of collapsing the toolbar on a report to a gear/action icon or similar? I have the feeling that the toolbar is not regularly used and collapsing it could save some space. This could be an optional property so that the toolbar can be displayed as expended by default. Best regards,Daniel]]></description>
  1491.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Daniel Krüger Cosmo Consult)]]></author>
  1492.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/6263#msg-6263</guid>
  1493.                <pubDate>Sun, 24 Nov 2024 09:57:30 +0100</pubDate>
  1494.                            </item>
  1495.                    <item>
  1496.                
  1497.                <title><![CDATA[Dashboard Report tile improvements]]></title>
  1498.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/6262#msg-6262</link>
  1499.                <description><![CDATA[Hi,this may be a duplicate but I&#039;m not sure whether I have added it and didn&#039;t found anything related.It would be great if we could display report tiles not only vertically but also horizontally (floating).In addition it would be great if we could not only select a  custom font color for the accent but one of the new brand colors in WEBCON BPS 2025. Than we could amend the colors based on light/dark or contrast theme.Best regards,Daniel]]></description>
  1500.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Daniel Krüger Cosmo Consult)]]></author>
  1501.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/6262#msg-6262</guid>
  1502.                <pubDate>Sun, 24 Nov 2024 09:49:12 +0100</pubDate>
  1503.                            </item>
  1504.                    <item>
  1505.                
  1506.                <title><![CDATA[Adding support for field name placement:  above for old fields]]></title>
  1507.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/6261#msg-6261</link>
  1508.                <description><![CDATA[Hi,depending on the use case / form it may be helpful to extend the option to place field names above the control from multi line fields to all fields.They are already automatically placed above, if you are using a mobile/tablet , but this could also help when using a PC. Especially if you are using an other form template than 50/50 this may improve the UI when for &quot;normal&quot; monitor resolution and large ones.You can take a look at the attached screenshot, how it may look like in 1920x and 3840x resolution. I only have a 24&quot; monitor so the 3840 is faked and really blurry. Best regards,Daniel]]></description>
  1509.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Daniel Krüger Cosmo Consult)]]></author>
  1510.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/6261#msg-6261</guid>
  1511.                <pubDate>Sun, 24 Nov 2024 09:43:43 +0100</pubDate>
  1512.                            </item>
  1513.                    <item>
  1514.                
  1515.                <title><![CDATA[BPS 2025: Ideas for navigation with multilingual elements]]></title>
  1516.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/6235#msg-6235</link>
  1517.                <description><![CDATA[Hi everyone,while it is not so easy to come up with a new navigation structure with folders and elements in these folder with WEBCON BPS 2025, I have even more problems with multilingual elements.My current navigation is like:Main start button Active (folder)History (folder)Administration (folder)Adding elements to the folders was pretty easy but I have no good idea on how to sort the elements in the folder, at least if you support more than one language. While the &quot;Configuration&quot; may come up as the first element in the folder, the German translation would be &quot;Konfiguration&quot; and somewhere in the middle.Ok, we would have had this problem already in all other versions, but it wasn&#039;t so obvious because I had hidden a lot of the elements in the &quot;Administration&quot; folder and the other folders are quite empty.My idea for this would be to provide two settings on the navigation element dialog:- Position is fixed- Sort alphabeticallyFor example we could activate &quot;Position is fixed&quot; for all folders and the top x elements in the folders, while we could set &quot;Sort alphabetically&quot; for the remaining in the list.Configuration / English layoutMain start button  (fixed)Active (folder)(fixed)- Start main workflow (fixed)- Main workflow (fixed)- Child workflow (fixed)History (folder)(fixed)- Child workflow  (fixed)- Main workflow (fixed)Administration (folder)(fixed)- Dashboard  (fixed)- Often used element 1 (fixed)- Often used element 2 (fixed)- Report Child  (1) (sort alphabetically)- Report Main (2) (sort alphabetically)- Report Settings (3) (sort alphabetically)German layoutMain start button  (fixed)Active (folder)(fixed)- Start main workflow (fixed)- Main workflow (fixed)- Child workflow (fixed)History (folder)(fixed)- Child workflow  (fixed)- Main workflow (fixed)Administration (folder)(fixed)- Dashboard  (fixed)- Often used element 1 (fixed)- Often used element 2 (fixed)- Report Haupt  (1) (sort alphabetically)- Report Kind (2) (sort alphabetically)- Report Konfiguration (3) (sort alphabetically)]]></description>
  1518.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Daniel Krüger Cosmo Consult)]]></author>
  1519.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/6235#msg-6235</guid>
  1520.                <pubDate>Mon, 18 Nov 2024 20:19:41 +0100</pubDate>
  1521.                            </item>
  1522.                    <item>
  1523.                
  1524.                <title><![CDATA[SQL Server compatibility level]]></title>
  1525.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/3401#msg-6232</link>
  1526.                <description><![CDATA[Hey there, this case has already been addressed in 2025.1. Here&#039;s the excerpt from the change log: Changed the default compatibility level for new SQL databases created during the installation of the WEBCON BPS platform. As a result, the previous compatibility level set to 120 (SQL Server 2014) has been replaced with the highest possible level, which, however, cannot exceed 160 (SQL Server 2022). This modification does not affect existing databases, which will retain their compatibility level of 120.]]></description>
  1527.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Michal Rykiert)]]></author>
  1528.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/3401#msg-6232</guid>
  1529.                <pubDate>Mon, 18 Nov 2024 11:59:54 +0100</pubDate>
  1530.                            </item>
  1531.                    <item>
  1532.                
  1533.                <title><![CDATA[BPS 2025: Popup search should focus on input instead of the close button]]></title>
  1534.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/6215#msg-6215</link>
  1535.                <description><![CDATA[Hi,in WEBCON BPS 2025 R1 opening the popup search no longer focuses on the search input, instead the close button get&#039;s the focus.Entering the popup search and hitting the enter key will close the popup search instead of showing all elements.Best regards,Daniel]]></description>
  1536.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Daniel Krüger Cosmo Consult)]]></author>
  1537.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/6215#msg-6215</guid>
  1538.                <pubDate>Tue, 12 Nov 2024 20:25:46 +0100</pubDate>
  1539.                            </item>
  1540.                    <item>
  1541.                
  1542.                <title><![CDATA[Exclude process/form type from SOLR search index]]></title>
  1543.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/6214#msg-6214</link>
  1544.                <description><![CDATA[Hi,maybe I&#039;ve missed something in the documentation, https://docs.webcon.com/search?q=SOLRbut it would be a great option to exclude processes or form types from the search index.Processes I would like to exclude most of the time:- Dictionaries- Document template- Technical / helper workflowsThere are even cases, where it would be great if a workflow instance of a specific form type would be excluded.For example when a workflow instance get&#039;s &quot;archived&quot;, we change the form type, so that we can configure different privileges.Yes, we can restrict the access but that&#039;s not always possibile and than these workflow instances may pop up.Best regards,Daniel]]></description>
  1545.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Daniel Krüger Cosmo Consult)]]></author>
  1546.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/6214#msg-6214</guid>
  1547.                <pubDate>Tue, 12 Nov 2024 19:34:05 +0100</pubDate>
  1548.                            </item>
  1549.                    <item>
  1550.                
  1551.                <title><![CDATA[Option to revoke privileges after task completion]]></title>
  1552.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/6213#msg-6213</link>
  1553.                <description><![CDATA[Hi,A useful option would be the ability to automatically revoke the reading entitlement that remains after a task is assigned.Such an option could be checked on the task assignment action and in the task configuration on the path.Operation similar to the option on the add permission action where the permission expires after the path.Regards.]]></description>
  1554.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Karol Częczek)]]></author>
  1555.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/6213#msg-6213</guid>
  1556.                <pubDate>Tue, 12 Nov 2024 18:06:35 +0100</pubDate>
  1557.                            </item>
  1558.                    <item>
  1559.                
  1560.                <title><![CDATA[Unique value of the item list column]]></title>
  1561.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/6212#msg-6212</link>
  1562.                <description><![CDATA[Hi,It often happens that the list of items should have unique values, at least in 1 column.Currently, I often create and add a script to check when adding an item with this value already exists. A great convenience would be the option in the column configuration, &#039;unique item&#039;. The user would receive an alert that an item with this value has already been added to the list.Regards.]]></description>
  1563.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Karol Częczek)]]></author>
  1564.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/6212#msg-6212</guid>
  1565.                <pubDate>Tue, 12 Nov 2024 17:58:00 +0100</pubDate>
  1566.                            </item>
  1567.                    <item>
  1568.                
  1569.                <title><![CDATA[Confirmation of Process Cloning]]></title>
  1570.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/6204#msg-6204</link>
  1571.                <description><![CDATA[Adding a confirmation dialog for the process cloning action. Occasionally, users may accidentally click the clone button, and this accidental click leads to cloning the entire process, along with the full process/action definition, etc.]]></description>
  1572.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Krystian Golik)]]></author>
  1573.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/6204#msg-6204</guid>
  1574.                <pubDate>Tue, 12 Nov 2024 12:20:17 +0100</pubDate>
  1575.                            </item>
  1576.                    <item>
  1577.                
  1578.                <title><![CDATA[BPS 2025: No margin for HTML fields]]></title>
  1579.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/6197#msg-6199</link>
  1580.                <description><![CDATA[Dear Daniel,Yes, thats definitely something to address. Additionally, I would suggest including an element history feature along with design alignment for a more cohesive experience.Best.]]></description>
  1581.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Adam Hatak)]]></author>
  1582.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/6197#msg-6199</guid>
  1583.                <pubDate>Tue, 12 Nov 2024 09:38:28 +0100</pubDate>
  1584.                            </item>
  1585.                    <item>
  1586.                
  1587.                <title><![CDATA[BPS 2025: No margin for HTML fields]]></title>
  1588.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/6197#msg-6197</link>
  1589.                <description><![CDATA[Hi everyone,if I&#039;m using an HTML field it would be great, if there wouldn&#039;t be any margins imposed on the control (1). My only idea right now is to remove the class which causes this via JavaScript in the HTML field, so that it is aligned with the other controls (2).document.getElementById(&quot;SEL_HTML_#{WFCON:7009}#&quot;).querySelector(&quot;.grid-template__panel .upsidePanel__content&quot;).classList.remove(&quot;upsidePanel__content&quot;)or with CSS:#SEL_HTML_#{WFCON:7009}# .upsidePanel__content {margin-inline-end: 0px;margin-inline-start: 0px}Best regards,Daniel]]></description>
  1590.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Daniel Krüger Cosmo Consult)]]></author>
  1591.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/6197#msg-6197</guid>
  1592.                <pubDate>Mon, 11 Nov 2024 21:33:42 +0100</pubDate>
  1593.                            </item>
  1594.                    <item>
  1595.                
  1596.                <title><![CDATA[Duplication of attachments in the database]]></title>
  1597.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/6172#msg-6184</link>
  1598.                <description><![CDATA[Hello Marc,Data is not duplicated in the database if you don&#039;t make changes to the attachment. Basic attachment information is stored in the database in the [WFDataAttachments] table, while the attachment history, triggered by any edits, is stored in the [WFAttachmentFiles] table. If you make changes to the attachment, such as updating the category or description using WEBCON actions, the version history will increase.]]></description>
  1599.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Krystian Golik)]]></author>
  1600.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/6172#msg-6184</guid>
  1601.                <pubDate>Fri, 08 Nov 2024 16:18:51 +0100</pubDate>
  1602.                            </item>
  1603.                    <item>
  1604.                
  1605.                <title><![CDATA[Duplication of attachments in the database]]></title>
  1606.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/6172#msg-6174</link>
  1607.                <description><![CDATA[This would save a lot of ressources!]]></description>
  1608.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Andreas Schmidt)]]></author>
  1609.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/6172#msg-6174</guid>
  1610.                <pubDate>Thu, 07 Nov 2024 15:10:27 +0100</pubDate>
  1611.                            </item>
  1612.                    <item>
  1613.                
  1614.                <title><![CDATA[Archived instances: Better integration in the Advanced Analytics Framework and the global system search]]></title>
  1615.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/6171#msg-6173</link>
  1616.                <description><![CDATA[I absolutely agree, Marc! It is the customers with a huge amount of instances who get the most value from using Advanced Analytics Framework and archiving instances is necessary for exact those customers. Therefore archived instances need to be collected bei the Advanced Analytics Framework.]]></description>
  1617.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Andreas Schmidt)]]></author>
  1618.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/6171#msg-6173</guid>
  1619.                <pubDate>Thu, 07 Nov 2024 15:08:29 +0100</pubDate>
  1620.                            </item>
  1621.                    <item>
  1622.                
  1623.                <title><![CDATA[Duplication of attachments in the database]]></title>
  1624.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/6172#msg-6172</link>
  1625.                <description><![CDATA[Hello everyone,each time an instance is edited via a path, the attachments are duplicated in the database, even though they may not have been customized.Would it be possible for the attachments to only be duplicated if the current version has actually been edited?Best regardsMarc]]></description>
  1626.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Marc)]]></author>
  1627.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/6172#msg-6172</guid>
  1628.                <pubDate>Thu, 07 Nov 2024 15:06:12 +0100</pubDate>
  1629.                            </item>
  1630.                    <item>
  1631.                
  1632.                <title><![CDATA[Archived instances: Better integration in the Advanced Analytics Framework and the global system search]]></title>
  1633.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/6171#msg-6171</link>
  1634.                <description><![CDATA[Hello everyone,Unfortunately, no archived instances are currently taken into account in the Advanced Analytics Framework. Since we perform archiving cyclically to keep the memory requirements on our SQL server low, the required process insights are not displayed in the Analytics Framework.For large processes, the processes are currently archived 3 months after the instance is completed. In principle, however, we would like to archive the processes relatively directly after completion, but then they can no longer be found via the global search. For a simpler month-end closing, however, our financial accounting department needs a quick and easy way to access all instances.In short, we would like to see better integration of the archived instances in the Advanced Analytics Framework and in the system search.I look forward to your feedback!Best regardsMarc]]></description>
  1635.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Marc)]]></author>
  1636.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/6171#msg-6171</guid>
  1637.                <pubDate>Thu, 07 Nov 2024 14:49:48 +0100</pubDate>
  1638.                            </item>
  1639.                    <item>
  1640.                
  1641.                <title><![CDATA[Powershell action - Write Output to attribute, local variable.]]></title>
  1642.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/6140#msg-6140</link>
  1643.                <description><![CDATA[Hi,A useful option would be the ability to capture and save the output of a powershell action, either to an attribute or to a local variable. Similar to the mapping of response values in a REST action.This would allow the received data to be further processed/used in subsequent autumatization actions.Regards.]]></description>
  1644.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Karol Częczek)]]></author>
  1645.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/6140#msg-6140</guid>
  1646.                <pubDate>Mon, 04 Nov 2024 08:31:36 +0100</pubDate>
  1647.                            </item>
  1648.                    <item>
  1649.                
  1650.                <title><![CDATA[Reuse translations of columns from a BPS internal view in a Data row / data table]]></title>
  1651.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4098#msg-6125</link>
  1652.                <description><![CDATA[Hi Daniel, It is a great idea. I would like to see this feature in the WebCon BPS product. It would simplify translations and would keep them 1:1 and tidy in that case (especially when the Excel with translations is delegated to the business - as they now how to translate business phrases best). The topic of enhancing translations is crucial in our multi country/company environment. Best Regards, Dominik]]></description>
  1653.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Dominik Cholewinski)]]></author>
  1654.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4098#msg-6125</guid>
  1655.                <pubDate>Thu, 31 Oct 2024 15:20:31 +0100</pubDate>
  1656.                            </item>
  1657.                    <item>
  1658.                
  1659.                <title><![CDATA[Floating group option]]></title>
  1660.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/6105#msg-6105</link>
  1661.                <description><![CDATA[Hi,In my opinion, it would be useful to have the option of blocking the view of a given group at the top or bottom of the form (selectable in the configuration).It is about the behaviour when scrolling through the form. Similar to e.g. menu bar new, refresh, undoor like the tracks panel in the floating option at the bottom of the screen.Greetings.]]></description>
  1662.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Karol Częczek)]]></author>
  1663.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/6105#msg-6105</guid>
  1664.                <pubDate>Wed, 30 Oct 2024 08:49:03 +0100</pubDate>
  1665.                            </item>
  1666.                    <item>
  1667.                
  1668.                <title><![CDATA[Managing the view / layout of attributes in a group]]></title>
  1669.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/6102#msg-6102</link>
  1670.                <description><![CDATA[What if it were possible to add as an option the ability to specify the maximum number of attributes per line for a horizontal layout?In my conception, a larger number of attributes added to a group would be automatically set in the next line , creating a kind of table.In such a solution, any division could theoretically be achieved. Regards.]]></description>
  1671.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Karol Częczek)]]></author>
  1672.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/6102#msg-6102</guid>
  1673.                <pubDate>Wed, 30 Oct 2024 08:10:01 +0100</pubDate>
  1674.                            </item>
  1675.                    <item>
  1676.                
  1677.                <title><![CDATA[New Type Report]]></title>
  1678.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5962#msg-6061</link>
  1679.                <description><![CDATA[Thanks Michal for responding :)]]></description>
  1680.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (AlidEk)]]></author>
  1681.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5962#msg-6061</guid>
  1682.                <pubDate>Sat, 19 Oct 2024 15:34:55 +0200</pubDate>
  1683.                            </item>
  1684.                    <item>
  1685.                
  1686.                <title><![CDATA[UI / UX improvements]]></title>
  1687.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/6060#msg-6060</link>
  1688.                <description><![CDATA[Hi,Here are a few recommendations for UX / UX area:1. Search.1.1. The ability to hide the search bar in the left menu and display only the one at the top of the page.1.2. The ability to fully customize which elements are displayed in the search results records (to disable some of them).1.3. The ability to add selected fields from forms to the search results records.1.4. The ability to filter search results by selected fields from forms.2. Visual layer.2.1. Increased contrast: black text on a white background, white text on a dark background.2.2. Removal or reduction of light gray overlays.3. Left menu.3.1. The ability to customize which elements are displayed there, e.g., removing: search, &quot;Highlights,&quot; &quot;Dashboards.&quot;3.2. Greater customization options for the reports menu (choosing which reports to display and organizing them in a multi-level structure).]]></description>
  1689.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (DawidKuzyka_mBH)]]></author>
  1690.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/6060#msg-6060</guid>
  1691.                <pubDate>Fri, 18 Oct 2024 09:14:01 +0200</pubDate>
  1692.                            </item>
  1693.                    <item>
  1694.                
  1695.                <title><![CDATA[Expanding the User Update API with Additional Synchronization Data]]></title>
  1696.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/6021#msg-6022</link>
  1697.                <description><![CDATA[Hi Krystian,I interpret this request as extending the whole (external) BPS User object which currently consist of the listed properties and the API is just one part of it.Is this correct?Off topic:Are you at the WEBCON DAY next week? I would be interested in how you are handling multi-tenant environments.Especially in terms of users of tenant a) may not see the users of tenant b).Best regards,Daniel]]></description>
  1698.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Daniel Krüger Cosmo Consult)]]></author>
  1699.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/6021#msg-6022</guid>
  1700.                <pubDate>Mon, 14 Oct 2024 20:54:37 +0200</pubDate>
  1701.                            </item>
  1702.                    <item>
  1703.                
  1704.                <title><![CDATA[Expanding the User Update API with Additional Synchronization Data]]></title>
  1705.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/6021#msg-6021</link>
  1706.                <description><![CDATA[The current version of the API allows updates for the following fields:{  &quot;name&quot;: &quot;string&quot;,  &quot;email&quot;: &quot;string&quot;,  &quot;phoneNumber&quot;: &quot;string&quot;,  &quot;managerBpsId&quot;: &quot;string&quot;,  &quot;jobTitle&quot;: &quot;string&quot;}It would be useful to expand the user API to include fields such as:- Department- isActive- COS_ExtensionAttribute1-20The isActive field would be helpful for deactivation in case of WEBCON&#039;s integration with AAD when handling multi-tenant environments and retrieving users from multiple Tenant IDs.]]></description>
  1707.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Krystian Golik)]]></author>
  1708.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/6021#msg-6021</guid>
  1709.                <pubDate>Mon, 14 Oct 2024 18:24:32 +0200</pubDate>
  1710.                            </item>
  1711.                    <item>
  1712.                
  1713.                <title><![CDATA[Differen Favicon based on environment]]></title>
  1714.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5898#msg-6011</link>
  1715.                <description><![CDATA[Understandable :)]]></description>
  1716.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Maksymilian Stachowiak)]]></author>
  1717.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5898#msg-6011</guid>
  1718.                <pubDate>Mon, 14 Oct 2024 09:53:19 +0200</pubDate>
  1719.                            </item>
  1720.                    <item>
  1721.                
  1722.                <title><![CDATA[Installation and launching of Designer Studio from the browser can be done independently]]></title>
  1723.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/6007#msg-6009</link>
  1724.                <description><![CDATA[Hi Traian, while this would be really great, you can workaround this limitation:https://daniels-notes.de/posts/2022/open-designer-studio-in-a-specifc-versionBest regards,Daniel]]></description>
  1725.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Daniel Krüger Cosmo Consult)]]></author>
  1726.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/6007#msg-6009</guid>
  1727.                <pubDate>Fri, 11 Oct 2024 12:41:41 +0200</pubDate>
  1728.                            </item>
  1729.                    <item>
  1730.                
  1731.                <title><![CDATA[Installation and launching of Designer Studio from the browser can be done independently]]></title>
  1732.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/6007#msg-6007</link>
  1733.                <description><![CDATA[New versions should be available for download an install separately of the existent installed Designer versions, or there should be an option to update or downgrade the existent versions.It is annoying when i can not use older versions after upgrading to new version of Designer Studio.]]></description>
  1734.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Traian Istrati)]]></author>
  1735.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/6007#msg-6007</guid>
  1736.                <pubDate>Fri, 11 Oct 2024 11:36:41 +0200</pubDate>
  1737.                            </item>
  1738.                    <item>
  1739.                
  1740.                <title><![CDATA[New Type Report]]></title>
  1741.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5962#msg-6005</link>
  1742.                <description><![CDATA[We don&#039;t deny the usefulness of such functionality, however it poses certain UX complication when combined with other, already present features. With that said, at this point, other features will be prioritized, but we appreciate your input!]]></description>
  1743.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Michal Rykiert)]]></author>
  1744.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5962#msg-6005</guid>
  1745.                <pubDate>Fri, 11 Oct 2024 09:50:46 +0200</pubDate>
  1746.                            </item>
  1747.                    <item>
  1748.                
  1749.                <title><![CDATA[Item list Add summ column if Atribute type is Yes/No choice]]></title>
  1750.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5954#msg-6004</link>
  1751.                <description><![CDATA[Sounds reasonable. It goes straight to the backlog. Stay tuned!]]></description>
  1752.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Michal Rykiert)]]></author>
  1753.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5954#msg-6004</guid>
  1754.                <pubDate>Fri, 11 Oct 2024 09:44:19 +0200</pubDate>
  1755.                            </item>
  1756.                    <item>
  1757.                
  1758.                <title><![CDATA[Schedule maintenance with notification on homepage]]></title>
  1759.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5925#msg-6003</link>
  1760.                <description><![CDATA[We&#039;re putting your suggestion under review. Stay tuned.]]></description>
  1761.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Michal Rykiert)]]></author>
  1762.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5925#msg-6003</guid>
  1763.                <pubDate>Fri, 11 Oct 2024 09:43:36 +0200</pubDate>
  1764.                            </item>
  1765.                    <item>
  1766.                
  1767.                <title><![CDATA[Extend Rest Api with extended reporting possibilities]]></title>
  1768.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5924#msg-6002</link>
  1769.                <description><![CDATA[Let&#039;s wait for votes and voices. We&#039;d like to evaluate if such suggestion would be applicable to wider audience.]]></description>
  1770.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Michal Rykiert)]]></author>
  1771.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5924#msg-6002</guid>
  1772.                <pubDate>Fri, 11 Oct 2024 09:42:45 +0200</pubDate>
  1773.                            </item>
  1774.                    <item>
  1775.                
  1776.                <title><![CDATA[Differen Favicon based on environment]]></title>
  1777.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5898#msg-6001</link>
  1778.                <description><![CDATA[We discussed your suggestion. At this point, other development ideas will be prioritized based on the level of impact. With that said, I&#039;m glad we had some suggestions in this thread about individual browser settings that are helpful.]]></description>
  1779.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Michal Rykiert)]]></author>
  1780.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5898#msg-6001</guid>
  1781.                <pubDate>Fri, 11 Oct 2024 09:41:21 +0200</pubDate>
  1782.                            </item>
  1783.                    <item>
  1784.                
  1785.                <title><![CDATA[change Process Import/Configuration grid]]></title>
  1786.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5810#msg-6000</link>
  1787.                <description><![CDATA[While we agree that there&#039;s room for improvements, at this point we&#039;ll be focusing on the development of features with higher impact and priority. With that said, we&#039;ll re-visit this thread request in the future.]]></description>
  1788.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Michal Rykiert)]]></author>
  1789.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5810#msg-6000</guid>
  1790.                <pubDate>Fri, 11 Oct 2024 09:38:23 +0200</pubDate>
  1791.                            </item>
  1792.                    <item>
  1793.                
  1794.                <title><![CDATA[HTML in report calculated columns]]></title>
  1795.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5803#msg-5999</link>
  1796.                <description><![CDATA[In general, we recommend using the default styling options. Right now, we don&#039;t plan further enhancements in this area.]]></description>
  1797.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Michal Rykiert)]]></author>
  1798.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5803#msg-5999</guid>
  1799.                <pubDate>Fri, 11 Oct 2024 09:36:26 +0200</pubDate>
  1800.                            </item>
  1801.                    <item>
  1802.                
  1803.                <title><![CDATA[Article images fix]]></title>
  1804.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5802#msg-5998</link>
  1805.                <description><![CDATA[The pics in the article display correctly.The limit on the Regex validation has been vastly extended, and so far in relation to v. 2024 nobody has reached it yet :). So yes, there is progress in backlog. We&#039;re catching up with updating statuses.]]></description>
  1806.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Michal Rykiert)]]></author>
  1807.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5802#msg-5998</guid>
  1808.                <pubDate>Fri, 11 Oct 2024 09:33:51 +0200</pubDate>
  1809.                            </item>
  1810.                    <item>
  1811.                
  1812.                <title><![CDATA[Description field to describe purpose of adding substitution]]></title>
  1813.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5991#msg-5993</link>
  1814.                <description><![CDATA[Great idea.]]></description>
  1815.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (MikeS)]]></author>
  1816.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5991#msg-5993</guid>
  1817.                <pubDate>Thu, 10 Oct 2024 11:27:52 +0200</pubDate>
  1818.                            </item>
  1819.                    <item>
  1820.                
  1821.                <title><![CDATA[Description field to describe purpose of adding substitution]]></title>
  1822.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5991#msg-5992</link>
  1823.                <description><![CDATA[Excellent idea!]]></description>
  1824.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Marcin Cudny)]]></author>
  1825.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5991#msg-5992</guid>
  1826.                <pubDate>Thu, 10 Oct 2024 11:21:27 +0200</pubDate>
  1827.                            </item>
  1828.                    <item>
  1829.                
  1830.                <title><![CDATA[Description field to describe purpose of adding substitution]]></title>
  1831.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5991#msg-5991</link>
  1832.                <description><![CDATA[HiLongtext field in substitutions panel would help helpdesk in their job ex. bussiness asks why substitution is added, and we could store such information in this fieldBest regardsKuba]]></description>
  1833.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Jakub Procesy)]]></author>
  1834.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5991#msg-5991</guid>
  1835.                <pubDate>Thu, 10 Oct 2024 11:18:47 +0200</pubDate>
  1836.                            </item>
  1837.                    <item>
  1838.                
  1839.                <title><![CDATA[Constants - add info is always treated as TEXT or add set type]]></title>
  1840.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5961#msg-5990</link>
  1841.                <description><![CDATA[Referring to my problem here:https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5957it doesn&#039;t behave like &quot;number&quot; but like text.so I needed (thx Jacek Wojnar) to change constant text to decimal so ... constant with &quot;.&quot; or &quot;,&quot; is text not number ....so in help please add number with out &quot;.&quot; or &quot;,&quot; is number but fraction is text .... :|or add option to declare in constants string of characters as:integer / fraction / string (text) / double / long ect.btw: I am in webcon 2022.1.4.404]]></description>
  1842.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Paweł Tołoczko)]]></author>
  1843.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5961#msg-5990</guid>
  1844.                <pubDate>Thu, 10 Oct 2024 08:15:09 +0200</pubDate>
  1845.                            </item>
  1846.                    <item>
  1847.                
  1848.                <title><![CDATA[Constants - add info is always treated as TEXT or add set type]]></title>
  1849.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5961#msg-5989</link>
  1850.                <description><![CDATA[Hi Pawe, I believe the constant type is adjusted based on where and how it is used.So for example if the constant value is a number, you can use it in an arithmetic operation without any problems.Cheers,Dawid]]></description>
  1851.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Dawid Porowski)]]></author>
  1852.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5961#msg-5989</guid>
  1853.                <pubDate>Wed, 09 Oct 2024 14:31:15 +0200</pubDate>
  1854.                            </item>
  1855.                    <item>
  1856.                
  1857.                <title><![CDATA[Unifying the visibility of list columns on reports]]></title>
  1858.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5982#msg-5982</link>
  1859.                <description><![CDATA[Hi,I propose to unify and add a visibility option available on the standard attribute Visibility on report independent of visibility on formto the visibility option on item list columns.Regards.]]></description>
  1860.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Karol Częczek)]]></author>
  1861.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5982#msg-5982</guid>
  1862.                <pubDate>Tue, 08 Oct 2024 14:51:57 +0200</pubDate>
  1863.                            </item>
  1864.                    <item>
  1865.                
  1866.                <title><![CDATA[Prevent saving if RegEx validation fails?]]></title>
  1867.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5969#msg-5980</link>
  1868.                <description><![CDATA[Hi Dawid,oh sorry. I attached it. Yes, the regex is validate , a warning is displayed too  but I can still save the workflow using the save menu button.If I then open the workflow instance in edit mode the error is also displayed immediately.Best regards,Daniel]]></description>
  1869.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Daniel Krüger Cosmo Consult)]]></author>
  1870.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5969#msg-5980</guid>
  1871.                <pubDate>Tue, 08 Oct 2024 14:12:07 +0200</pubDate>
  1872.                            </item>
  1873.                    <item>
  1874.                
  1875.                <title><![CDATA[Prevent saving if RegEx validation fails?]]></title>
  1876.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5969#msg-5976</link>
  1877.                <description><![CDATA[Hi Daniel,I think I understand the issue, but just to be sure, can you please attach the screenshot you mentioned in your post? CheersDawid]]></description>
  1878.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Dawid Porowski)]]></author>
  1879.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5969#msg-5976</guid>
  1880.                <pubDate>Tue, 08 Oct 2024 10:55:08 +0200</pubDate>
  1881.                            </item>
  1882.                    <item>
  1883.                
  1884.                <title><![CDATA[Prevent saving if RegEx validation fails?]]></title>
  1885.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5969#msg-5969</link>
  1886.                <description><![CDATA[Hi,if we are saving a workflow instance the form validation is ignored. This includes regular expression. In my opinion the regular expression should be checked and if they are not successful, saving should be prevented. Otherwise we will be able to save invalid data, which in turn can lead to issues, if the data is used in other workflows.In our case the field can be used as the display name of choose fields and we wanted to prevent the use of the special characters ; and #.The attached image has been taken from 2024.1.1.88. Best regards,Daniel]]></description>
  1887.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Daniel Krüger Cosmo Consult)]]></author>
  1888.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5969#msg-5969</guid>
  1889.                <pubDate>Mon, 07 Oct 2024 11:12:32 +0200</pubDate>
  1890.                            </item>
  1891.                    <item>
  1892.                
  1893.                <title><![CDATA[New Type Report]]></title>
  1894.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5962#msg-5962</link>
  1895.                <description><![CDATA[Hello, I  need to look through xx documents one by one. I think that a very interesting solution would be a report that would allow you to jump element by element.For example, I have 100 documents to review and I don&#039;t have to go to each one individually, but move through the pages of a book in the report.Same think as is done on history element its possible jumping one by one change. Or Mebay its already implementent and i Dont know were it is ?:)]]></description>
  1896.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (AlidEk)]]></author>
  1897.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5962#msg-5962</guid>
  1898.                <pubDate>Thu, 03 Oct 2024 14:06:42 +0200</pubDate>
  1899.                            </item>
  1900.                    <item>
  1901.                
  1902.                <title><![CDATA[Constants - add info is always treated as TEXT or add set type]]></title>
  1903.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5961#msg-5961</link>
  1904.                <description><![CDATA[Constants - add info is always treated as TEXTor add option to set type of Constantshttps://docs.webcon.com/docs/2024R1/Studio/Process/Process_Variables#konfiguracja-sta%C5%82ej]]></description>
  1905.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Paweł Tołoczko)]]></author>
  1906.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5961#msg-5961</guid>
  1907.                <pubDate>Thu, 03 Oct 2024 14:03:09 +0200</pubDate>
  1908.                            </item>
  1909.                    <item>
  1910.                
  1911.                <title><![CDATA[Item list Add summ column if Atribute type is Yes/No choice]]></title>
  1912.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5954#msg-5954</link>
  1913.                <description><![CDATA[In Webcon 2022.1.4.404 this function is not present but probably in 2024 as wellso...I would like to have sum of &quot;Yes&quot; in Item list if the field is &quot;&quot;Yes/No choice&quot;sum I could copy to field in item list config but nowI need:1. do rule in item list  -&gt; to do action if row is added (cloned) or deleted 2. do rule in each item list column where is &quot;&quot;Yes/No choice&quot;&quot; type -&gt; to count changing no.or maybe I do it wrong way ... :| ?]]></description>
  1914.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Paweł Tołoczko)]]></author>
  1915.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5954#msg-5954</guid>
  1916.                <pubDate>Thu, 03 Oct 2024 10:18:50 +0200</pubDate>
  1917.                            </item>
  1918.                    <item>
  1919.                
  1920.                <title><![CDATA[Differen Favicon based on environment]]></title>
  1921.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5898#msg-5935</link>
  1922.                <description><![CDATA[In FF you can use : addon FoxyTaband then configure in easy way web addresses...I DID that way, and icon &gt;&gt;  i don&#039;t care ... I have tab color  :)]]></description>
  1923.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Paweł Tołoczko)]]></author>
  1924.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5898#msg-5935</guid>
  1925.                <pubDate>Mon, 30 Sep 2024 09:31:03 +0200</pubDate>
  1926.                            </item>
  1927.                    <item>
  1928.                
  1929.                <title><![CDATA[Schedule maintenance with notification on homepage]]></title>
  1930.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5925#msg-5934</link>
  1931.                <description><![CDATA[Hi, what do you think of this variation? It&#039;s pure CSS, so it can be used by everyone already.I&#039;ve never thought about the requirement, but I think I will use this in my environments. :).application-selection::before {    content: &quot;Planned maintenance 2024-10-03&quot;;    color: red;     font-size: 16px;}]]></description>
  1932.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Daniel Krüger Cosmo Consult)]]></author>
  1933.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5925#msg-5934</guid>
  1934.                <pubDate>Mon, 30 Sep 2024 06:47:22 +0200</pubDate>
  1935.                            </item>
  1936.                    <item>
  1937.                
  1938.                <title><![CDATA[Schedule maintenance with notification on homepage]]></title>
  1939.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5925#msg-5933</link>
  1940.                <description><![CDATA[Yes and from my experience uses don&#039;t read it. I&#039;m pretty sure if this could be a pop-up banner (like the one about cookies) with solid background color displayed on top it will be noticed.I could add form rule with alert option for every (or most) processes. Global banner with customized text probably would be good option.I&#039;m not looking for a solution here - this is just my idea and user voice I find useful. Best.]]></description>
  1941.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Adam Hatak)]]></author>
  1942.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5925#msg-5933</guid>
  1943.                <pubDate>Sun, 29 Sep 2024 21:35:44 +0200</pubDate>
  1944.                            </item>
  1945.                    <item>
  1946.                
  1947.                <title><![CDATA[Schedule maintenance with notification on homepage]]></title>
  1948.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5925#msg-5932</link>
  1949.                <description><![CDATA[Have you thought about using WEBCON BPS - &gt; Welcome Text?]]></description>
  1950.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Pawel Jawien WEBCON)]]></author>
  1951.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5925#msg-5932</guid>
  1952.                <pubDate>Sun, 29 Sep 2024 19:40:42 +0200</pubDate>
  1953.                            </item>
  1954.                    <item>
  1955.                
  1956.                <title><![CDATA[Schedule maintenance with notification on homepage]]></title>
  1957.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5925#msg-5930</link>
  1958.                <description><![CDATA[Dear Pawel, thanks for your response. My idea was to schedule a maintenance in future. For example, set an scheduled maintenance activities on 10th of October. Until then when users will be opening WEBCON BPS website, they can see notification about planned maintenance on 10th of October.]]></description>
  1959.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Adam Hatak)]]></author>
  1960.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5925#msg-5930</guid>
  1961.                <pubDate>Sun, 29 Sep 2024 18:09:37 +0200</pubDate>
  1962.                            </item>
  1963.                    <item>
  1964.                
  1965.                <title><![CDATA[Schedule maintenance with notification on homepage]]></title>
  1966.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5925#msg-5928</link>
  1967.                <description><![CDATA[Hi AdamThere is built-in mechanism in WEBCON BPS but it works only during DB maintenance.  During WEBCONBPS site maintenance, you can use dedicated IIS Sites (with a dedicated Application Pool). That site is stopped during normal WEBCON BPS operation and started during Portal maintenance only.]]></description>
  1968.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Pawel Jawien WEBCON)]]></author>
  1969.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5925#msg-5928</guid>
  1970.                <pubDate>Sun, 29 Sep 2024 12:59:17 +0200</pubDate>
  1971.                            </item>
  1972.                    <item>
  1973.                
  1974.                <title><![CDATA[WEBCON BPS Designer Studio better support for screen scaling]]></title>
  1975.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5703#msg-5927</link>
  1976.                <description><![CDATA[Dear Michal, Web-based version of Studio - that&#039;s hot! Great!]]></description>
  1977.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Adam Hatak)]]></author>
  1978.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5703#msg-5927</guid>
  1979.                <pubDate>Sun, 29 Sep 2024 12:16:10 +0200</pubDate>
  1980.                            </item>
  1981.                    <item>
  1982.                
  1983.                <title><![CDATA[Folders in attachments]]></title>
  1984.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5758#msg-5926</link>
  1985.                <description><![CDATA[Dear Michal, Regular users are more familiar with folders and files than categories. They could create folders in attachment section to better organize them. Many processes in companies includes more than one file. Folders also could be a solution for manual versioning the files. I can imagine that we can set &quot;predefined&quot; folder structure in process and users are obligated to add valid attachments into.In process where users collaborate back and forth many attachments can be added during the flow. Adding folders can help keeping attachments organized.This is just an idea. :)]]></description>
  1986.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Adam Hatak)]]></author>
  1987.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5758#msg-5926</guid>
  1988.                <pubDate>Sun, 29 Sep 2024 12:10:01 +0200</pubDate>
  1989.                            </item>
  1990.                    <item>
  1991.                
  1992.                <title><![CDATA[Schedule maintenance with notification on homepage]]></title>
  1993.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5925#msg-5925</link>
  1994.                <description><![CDATA[Dear Community,Ive come up with an idea to enhance how we schedule maintenance service windows in WEBCON BPS. What if we introduced the ability to set maintenance periods (either ad-hoc or recurring) directly within the system (in Studio or on website in Admin area)? This would allow users to see a notification on their WEBCON BPS homepage, informing them of upcoming scheduled maintenance.I believe this feature could improve communication and transparency, helping users plan accordingly for any service interruptions.If you like this idea, please vote for it.]]></description>
  1995.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Adam Hatak)]]></author>
  1996.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5925#msg-5925</guid>
  1997.                <pubDate>Sun, 29 Sep 2024 12:00:43 +0200</pubDate>
  1998.                            </item>
  1999.                    <item>
  2000.                
  2001.                <title><![CDATA[Extend Rest Api with extended reporting possibilities]]></title>
  2002.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5924#msg-5924</link>
  2003.                <description><![CDATA[Via public api we can query reports and views. However, they lack of the possibility to apply filters, search in specific fields or apply a full text search. Basically all the things we can do within a report on the portalTo achieve this, we currently have to use the undocumented internal api, that reports use when we apply filters and search for elements.This works perfectly so far, but it would be much better to have this functionality also within the public api.]]></description>
  2004.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Markus Jenni)]]></author>
  2005.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5924#msg-5924</guid>
  2006.                <pubDate>Fri, 27 Sep 2024 09:03:13 +0200</pubDate>
  2007.                            </item>
  2008.                    <item>
  2009.                
  2010.                <title><![CDATA[Differen Favicon based on environment]]></title>
  2011.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5898#msg-5923</link>
  2012.                <description><![CDATA[Hi,We&#039;re already doing same thing, but it brings nothing to seeing which tab is which environment unless you click on the tab and check it ;)]]></description>
  2013.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Maksymilian Stachowiak)]]></author>
  2014.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5898#msg-5923</guid>
  2015.                <pubDate>Thu, 26 Sep 2024 13:47:37 +0200</pubDate>
  2016.                            </item>
  2017.                    <item>
  2018.                
  2019.                <title><![CDATA[Differen Favicon based on environment]]></title>
  2020.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5898#msg-5922</link>
  2021.                <description><![CDATA[Hi, I always create an additional motif on each environment with the environment logo, Prod - company logo.additional marking will also be very helpful.Regards.]]></description>
  2022.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Karol Częczek)]]></author>
  2023.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5898#msg-5922</guid>
  2024.                <pubDate>Thu, 26 Sep 2024 13:41:20 +0200</pubDate>
  2025.                            </item>
  2026.                    <item>
  2027.                
  2028.                <title><![CDATA[Differen Favicon based on environment]]></title>
  2029.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5898#msg-5915</link>
  2030.                <description><![CDATA[Noted!]]></description>
  2031.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Michal Rykiert)]]></author>
  2032.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5898#msg-5915</guid>
  2033.                <pubDate>Wed, 25 Sep 2024 14:35:50 +0200</pubDate>
  2034.                            </item>
  2035.                    <item>
  2036.                
  2037.                <title><![CDATA[Change field value actions: Ignore field visibility/editability when setting fields]]></title>
  2038.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5894#msg-5913</link>
  2039.                <description><![CDATA[Hi Daniel,our team has investigated the case you descirbed. They were able to ascertain that the scenario where read only fields are not modified only happens to regular drop down fields. In such case the temporary workaround is to change the field type e.g. to autocomplete (or any other). Can you please confirm that this is the case for you as well?BTW. We plan to correct this behavior in the next minor release (in approx. 3 weeks).]]></description>
  2040.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Michal Rykiert)]]></author>
  2041.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5894#msg-5913</guid>
  2042.                <pubDate>Wed, 25 Sep 2024 13:37:08 +0200</pubDate>
  2043.                            </item>
  2044.                    <item>
  2045.                
  2046.                <title><![CDATA[Differen Favicon based on environment]]></title>
  2047.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5898#msg-5898</link>
  2048.                <description><![CDATA[Hi everyone,When working on multiple environments, with many tabs opened in the browser there is high chance to get lost in which ones are DEV/TEST/PROD.Maybe there is a chance to have a different Favicon per environment?Browsers offer grouping etc, so it&#039;s possible to manage, but it would be a nice touch :)Ideas in attachment.* Color coded as Designer Studio* With letters]]></description>
  2049.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Maksymilian Stachowiak)]]></author>
  2050.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5898#msg-5898</guid>
  2051.                <pubDate>Tue, 24 Sep 2024 11:01:45 +0200</pubDate>
  2052.                            </item>
  2053.                    <item>
  2054.                
  2055.                <title><![CDATA[.]]></title>
  2056.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5686#msg-5897</link>
  2057.                <description><![CDATA[I&#039;ve verified before my previous answer and, as much as I hate to say it, it worked for me. Therefore, some more in-depth investigation may be needed. I recommend contacting our support (support.webcon.com) so they could help you individually.]]></description>
  2058.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Michal Rykiert)]]></author>
  2059.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5686#msg-5897</guid>
  2060.                <pubDate>Tue, 24 Sep 2024 10:53:59 +0200</pubDate>
  2061.                            </item>
  2062.                    <item>
  2063.                
  2064.                <title><![CDATA[Inserting Instance Id variable with single quote]]></title>
  2065.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5519#msg-5895</link>
  2066.                <description><![CDATA[Hi Michal,I just noticed your response, I still get any mails.Maybe my long text /explanation was misleading.My suggestion is that a click in the expression editor of a node in the values tab, does insert the variable with single quotes.If I click on a constant it is currently inserted like thisselect {EPV:70}With the change it would beselect &#039;{EPV:70}&#039;There&#039;s no backward compatibility, it only applies when the user clicks on the element in the Designer Studio. :)Unfortunately I have just created a new user voice before and I had to chuckle when I read &quot;backward compatibility&quot;.https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5894/15Best regards,Daniel]]></description>
  2067.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Daniel Krüger Cosmo Consult)]]></author>
  2068.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5519#msg-5895</guid>
  2069.                <pubDate>Tue, 24 Sep 2024 08:28:32 +0200</pubDate>
  2070.                            </item>
  2071.                    <item>
  2072.                
  2073.                <title><![CDATA[Change field value actions: Ignore field visibility/editability when setting fields]]></title>
  2074.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5894#msg-5894</link>
  2075.                <description><![CDATA[Hi,this one is related to this post:https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5796/15While I encountered that we can no longer set fields which are read-only using workflow control actions, I have run into the same using single field value actions.Currently 2024.1.1.88 we need to make sure that all fields we are settings with action have at least to be marked as &quot;read-only (cannot be modified except by JavaScript)&quot;. If they are inside a group/tab the tab the same this cannot be marked as read-only either.We have more than a few cases in which we have fields, which should not be editable by users but are set by the system. This was working fine all those years. If we would be updating, we would be forced to check all actions and the field matrix. Besides this effort, it also looks ugly on the form, if there&#039;s one field rendered as a disabled input field in a group of other plain text fieldsBest regards,Daniel]]></description>
  2076.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Daniel Krüger Cosmo Consult)]]></author>
  2077.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5894#msg-5894</guid>
  2078.                <pubDate>Tue, 24 Sep 2024 08:19:55 +0200</pubDate>
  2079.                            </item>
  2080.                    <item>
  2081.                
  2082.                <title><![CDATA[.]]></title>
  2083.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5686#msg-5892</link>
  2084.                <description><![CDATA[.]]></description>
  2085.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (nobody)]]></author>
  2086.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5686#msg-5892</guid>
  2087.                <pubDate>Mon, 23 Sep 2024 20:35:32 +0200</pubDate>
  2088.                            </item>
  2089.                    <item>
  2090.                
  2091.                <title><![CDATA[.]]></title>
  2092.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5686#msg-5881</link>
  2093.                <description><![CDATA[You can change the logo (displayed in the top-left part of the portal) in the settings of themes used in the system.]]></description>
  2094.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Michal Rykiert)]]></author>
  2095.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5686#msg-5881</guid>
  2096.                <pubDate>Mon, 23 Sep 2024 11:29:08 +0200</pubDate>
  2097.                            </item>
  2098.                    <item>
  2099.                
  2100.                <title><![CDATA[Adding the [Raw Text] option to business rules.]]></title>
  2101.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5645#msg-5880</link>
  2102.                <description><![CDATA[Daniel, I&#039;ve forwarded your suggestion to the devs.]]></description>
  2103.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Michal Rykiert)]]></author>
  2104.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5645#msg-5880</guid>
  2105.                <pubDate>Mon, 23 Sep 2024 11:27:18 +0200</pubDate>
  2106.                            </item>
  2107.                    <item>
  2108.                
  2109.                <title><![CDATA[.]]></title>
  2110.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5686#msg-5876</link>
  2111.                <description><![CDATA[.]]></description>
  2112.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (nobody)]]></author>
  2113.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5686#msg-5876</guid>
  2114.                <pubDate>Mon, 23 Sep 2024 00:07:16 +0200</pubDate>
  2115.                            </item>
  2116.                    <item>
  2117.                
  2118.                <title><![CDATA[Adding the [Raw Text] option to business rules.]]></title>
  2119.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5645#msg-5875</link>
  2120.                <description><![CDATA[That&#039;s great. :)At the moment I&#039;m holding back a customer who want&#039;s to update from 2022 version due to this limitation.Regarding &quot;since there are potentially multiple implications.&quot;Could you please verify the following use cases:- Usage in data sourcesFor example by creating dynamic URLs, query parameters, headers, whatever- Passing parameters - Passing search value and column (popup search) as parameters I&#039;ve lost count on tickets I&#039;ve created in this context.]]></description>
  2121.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Daniel Krüger Cosmo Consult)]]></author>
  2122.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5645#msg-5875</guid>
  2123.                <pubDate>Sun, 22 Sep 2024 11:51:02 +0200</pubDate>
  2124.                            </item>
  2125.                    <item>
  2126.                
  2127.                <title><![CDATA[Changes to the path configuration view]]></title>
  2128.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5783#msg-5872</link>
  2129.                <description><![CDATA[Agreed. Goes straight into the backlog.]]></description>
  2130.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Michal Rykiert)]]></author>
  2131.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5783#msg-5872</guid>
  2132.                <pubDate>Fri, 20 Sep 2024 14:34:59 +0200</pubDate>
  2133.                            </item>
  2134.                    <item>
  2135.                
  2136.                <title><![CDATA[Autocomplete: Support for HTML in Popup]]></title>
  2137.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5772#msg-5871</link>
  2138.                <description><![CDATA[We&#039;ll put that under review :)]]></description>
  2139.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Michal Rykiert)]]></author>
  2140.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5772#msg-5871</guid>
  2141.                <pubDate>Fri, 20 Sep 2024 14:33:58 +0200</pubDate>
  2142.                            </item>
  2143.                    <item>
  2144.                
  2145.                <title><![CDATA[Folders in attachments]]></title>
  2146.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5758#msg-5870</link>
  2147.                <description><![CDATA[Can you please elaborate why folders would be needed? Is it about a possibility of nesting folders within folders?]]></description>
  2148.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Michal Rykiert)]]></author>
  2149.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5758#msg-5870</guid>
  2150.                <pubDate>Fri, 20 Sep 2024 14:33:21 +0200</pubDate>
  2151.                            </item>
  2152.                    <item>
  2153.                
  2154.                <title><![CDATA[WEBCON BPS 2024: Duplicate effort/error prone when report tiles with links are used]]></title>
  2155.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5749#msg-5869</link>
  2156.                <description><![CDATA[We&#039;re going to investigate. I&#039;m chaning the status to &quot;under review&quot;.]]></description>
  2157.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Michal Rykiert)]]></author>
  2158.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5749#msg-5869</guid>
  2159.                <pubDate>Fri, 20 Sep 2024 14:32:11 +0200</pubDate>
  2160.                            </item>
  2161.                    <item>
  2162.                
  2163.                <title><![CDATA[Fourth environment of WEBCON BPS]]></title>
  2164.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5735#msg-5868</link>
  2165.                <description><![CDATA[We hear you and acknowlegde that there are scenarios requiring more than 3 environments. At this point we don&#039;t plan to introduce OOTB functionality to assign a fourth environment due to the numerous implications that would have to be accomodated.With that said, we&#039;ll assist with every single case where more than 3 environments are needed, just contact our support.]]></description>
  2166.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Michal Rykiert)]]></author>
  2167.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5735#msg-5868</guid>
  2168.                <pubDate>Fri, 20 Sep 2024 14:30:58 +0200</pubDate>
  2169.                            </item>
  2170.                    <item>
  2171.                
  2172.                <title><![CDATA[IS IN - vertical layout]]></title>
  2173.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5731#msg-5867</link>
  2174.                <description><![CDATA[Agreed! Most probably we&#039;ll let users decide on the layout orientation. Your suggestion goes straight into the backlog :).]]></description>
  2175.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Michal Rykiert)]]></author>
  2176.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5731#msg-5867</guid>
  2177.                <pubDate>Fri, 20 Sep 2024 14:26:04 +0200</pubDate>
  2178.                            </item>
  2179.                    <item>
  2180.                
  2181.                <title><![CDATA[Attachment Category set custom sortation / order]]></title>
  2182.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5727#msg-5866</link>
  2183.                <description><![CDATA[Hi Pawel, at the moment we don&#039;t plan any modifications related to the sorting. We may get back to your suggestion alongside other activities related to attachment / attachment categories.]]></description>
  2184.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Michal Rykiert)]]></author>
  2185.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5727#msg-5866</guid>
  2186.                <pubDate>Fri, 20 Sep 2024 14:24:15 +0200</pubDate>
  2187.                            </item>
  2188.                    <item>
  2189.                
  2190.                <title><![CDATA[Related attachments: Column names are confusing]]></title>
  2191.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5720#msg-5865</link>
  2192.                <description><![CDATA[We agree with the suggestion. For now we&#039;ll review it and see how we can proceed further.]]></description>
  2193.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Michal Rykiert)]]></author>
  2194.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5720#msg-5865</guid>
  2195.                <pubDate>Fri, 20 Sep 2024 14:22:08 +0200</pubDate>
  2196.                            </item>
  2197.                    <item>
  2198.                
  2199.                <title><![CDATA[[has been clarified] Suggestion: New menu item &#039;Tips &amp; Tricks&#039; -&gt; open for external content]]></title>
  2200.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5718#msg-5864</link>
  2201.                <description><![CDATA[I&#039;m encouraging you to publish your tips &amp; tricks in the knowledge base and with that said I&#039;m closing the topic :).]]></description>
  2202.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Michal Rykiert)]]></author>
  2203.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5718#msg-5864</guid>
  2204.                <pubDate>Fri, 20 Sep 2024 14:20:32 +0200</pubDate>
  2205.                            </item>
  2206.                    <item>
  2207.                
  2208.                <title><![CDATA[WEBCON BPS Designer Studio better support for screen scaling]]></title>
  2209.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5703#msg-5863</link>
  2210.                <description><![CDATA[We&#039;re working on a web-based Designer Studio that will replace the current client-based Studio. This case most probably be addressed in the new DS. For now I&#039;m closing the thread since instead of improving the current DS, we&#039;re going to introduce a completely new Studio :)]]></description>
  2211.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Michal Rykiert)]]></author>
  2212.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5703#msg-5863</guid>
  2213.                <pubDate>Fri, 20 Sep 2024 14:19:04 +0200</pubDate>
  2214.                            </item>
  2215.                    <item>
  2216.                
  2217.                <title><![CDATA[Copy field value to clipboard]]></title>
  2218.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5698#msg-5862</link>
  2219.                <description><![CDATA[We get the idea, although at this point it&#039;s a &quot;nice to have&quot; compared to other requested features since copying field values is possible using other methods. I&#039;m changing the status to &quot;not now&quot;.]]></description>
  2220.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Michal Rykiert)]]></author>
  2221.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5698#msg-5862</guid>
  2222.                <pubDate>Fri, 20 Sep 2024 14:16:06 +0200</pubDate>
  2223.                            </item>
  2224.                    <item>
  2225.                
  2226.                <title><![CDATA[.]]></title>
  2227.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5686#msg-5861</link>
  2228.                <description><![CDATA[This feature is already available. The current version of the mobile app uses the Portal styling settings, including the logo.]]></description>
  2229.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Michal Rykiert)]]></author>
  2230.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5686#msg-5861</guid>
  2231.                <pubDate>Fri, 20 Sep 2024 14:12:48 +0200</pubDate>
  2232.                            </item>
  2233.                    <item>
  2234.                
  2235.                <title><![CDATA[Copy link to clipboard - but rich!]]></title>
  2236.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5648#msg-5860</link>
  2237.                <description><![CDATA[We&#039;ll see what can be done. By the first glance it shouldn&#039;t be a rocket science :).I&#039;m changing the status to &quot;under review&quot;.]]></description>
  2238.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Michal Rykiert)]]></author>
  2239.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5648#msg-5860</guid>
  2240.                <pubDate>Fri, 20 Sep 2024 14:06:35 +0200</pubDate>
  2241.                            </item>
  2242.                    <item>
  2243.                
  2244.                <title><![CDATA[Adding the [Raw Text] option to business rules.]]></title>
  2245.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5645#msg-5859</link>
  2246.                <description><![CDATA[Good suggestion. Let us see how to implement it the optimal way since there are potentially multiple implications.I&#039;m changing the status to &quot;under review&quot;.]]></description>
  2247.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Michal Rykiert)]]></author>
  2248.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5645#msg-5859</guid>
  2249.                <pubDate>Fri, 20 Sep 2024 14:04:46 +0200</pubDate>
  2250.                            </item>
  2251.                    <item>
  2252.                
  2253.                <title><![CDATA[Data sources TAB in Application  - add column with Access to data in the context of system account]]></title>
  2254.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5581#msg-5858</link>
  2255.                <description><![CDATA[Sounds good. Most probably we will create a column as you suggested and make it hidden by default for the clarity of interface.For now I&#039;m changing the status to &quot;in backlog&quot;.]]></description>
  2256.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Michal Rykiert)]]></author>
  2257.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5581#msg-5858</guid>
  2258.                <pubDate>Fri, 20 Sep 2024 14:02:23 +0200</pubDate>
  2259.                            </item>
  2260.                    <item>
  2261.                
  2262.                <title><![CDATA[Tool tip for path description - HTML tags acceptation]]></title>
  2263.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5558#msg-5857</link>
  2264.                <description><![CDATA[It certainly makes sense since step description supports HTML tags. We&#039;ll have a closer look at path tool tips during the work on the UX.I&#039;m chaging the status to &quot;in backlog&quot;]]></description>
  2265.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Michal Rykiert)]]></author>
  2266.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5558#msg-5857</guid>
  2267.                <pubDate>Fri, 20 Sep 2024 14:00:10 +0200</pubDate>
  2268.                            </item>
  2269.                    <item>
  2270.                
  2271.                <title><![CDATA[Wishlist: Web push notifications!]]></title>
  2272.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5547#msg-5856</link>
  2273.                <description><![CDATA[Hi Waldemar, currently most clients configure mass e-mail notifications to reduce the amount of e-mails received by employees. There are also other ways to be informed about new tasks (e.g. PUSH on mobile). Therefore at this point we don&#039;t plan to introduce web-based PUSH notifications, although we may re-visit the idea in the future.]]></description>
  2274.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Michal Rykiert)]]></author>
  2275.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5547#msg-5856</guid>
  2276.                <pubDate>Fri, 20 Sep 2024 13:57:38 +0200</pubDate>
  2277.                            </item>
  2278.                    <item>
  2279.                
  2280.                <title><![CDATA[Widgets field: Wishlist for additional capabilities]]></title>
  2281.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5303#msg-5841</link>
  2282.                <description><![CDATA[We&#039;re writing it down for future reference, however with the high probability other features will be prioritize over it for the upcoming releases.]]></description>
  2283.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Michal Rykiert)]]></author>
  2284.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5303#msg-5841</guid>
  2285.                <pubDate>Tue, 17 Sep 2024 15:48:35 +0200</pubDate>
  2286.                            </item>
  2287.                    <item>
  2288.                
  2289.                <title><![CDATA[Company selection]]></title>
  2290.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5307#msg-5839</link>
  2291.                <description><![CDATA[We&#039;re working on new, web-based Designer Studio. You can expect scaling and performance improvements there.]]></description>
  2292.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Michal Rykiert)]]></author>
  2293.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5307#msg-5839</guid>
  2294.                <pubDate>Tue, 17 Sep 2024 09:57:34 +0200</pubDate>
  2295.                            </item>
  2296.                    <item>
  2297.                
  2298.                <title><![CDATA[SUGGESTION: NEW LAYOUT OPTION FOR DASHBOARD [50%-25%-25%]]]></title>
  2299.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5226#msg-5838</link>
  2300.                <description><![CDATA[Now Im really curious. Maybe there will be a preview at WEBCON DAY ;-) ? Our team is already looking forward to it!]]></description>
  2301.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Bjoern Poller)]]></author>
  2302.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5226#msg-5838</guid>
  2303.                <pubDate>Tue, 17 Sep 2024 07:48:56 +0200</pubDate>
  2304.                            </item>
  2305.                    <item>
  2306.                
  2307.                <title><![CDATA[[has been clarified] Suggestion: New menu item &#039;Tips &amp; Tricks&#039; -&gt; open for external content]]></title>
  2308.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5718#msg-5837</link>
  2309.                <description><![CDATA[Hi Michal,thank you for the clarification. I was concerned that smaller solutions might not fit into the Knowledge Base.The idea came up in our team when we were looking for a place to store tips &amp; tricks for new colleagues, and we concluded that even small examples could be helpful, especially for newcomers to WEBCON.Bye,Bjrn]]></description>
  2310.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Bjoern Poller)]]></author>
  2311.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5718#msg-5837</guid>
  2312.                <pubDate>Tue, 17 Sep 2024 07:46:20 +0200</pubDate>
  2313.                            </item>
  2314.                    <item>
  2315.                
  2316.                <title><![CDATA[Break with error operator  - possibility to use multi lines in Operator configuration]]></title>
  2317.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5530#msg-5836</link>
  2318.                <description><![CDATA[We&#039;re putting it under review. Stay tuned!]]></description>
  2319.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Michal Rykiert)]]></author>
  2320.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5530#msg-5836</guid>
  2321.                <pubDate>Mon, 16 Sep 2024 15:55:34 +0200</pubDate>
  2322.                            </item>
  2323.                    <item>
  2324.                
  2325.                <title><![CDATA[Inserting Instance Id variable with single quote]]></title>
  2326.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5519#msg-5835</link>
  2327.                <description><![CDATA[Hi Daniel, we see your point. However, given the development challenges the backward compatibility is a show-stopper here. Therefore, we decided to park this topic.]]></description>
  2328.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Michal Rykiert)]]></author>
  2329.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5519#msg-5835</guid>
  2330.                <pubDate>Mon, 16 Sep 2024 15:54:46 +0200</pubDate>
  2331.                            </item>
  2332.                    <item>
  2333.                
  2334.                <title><![CDATA[Colorize/Highlight process user privilege if form type privileges are used]]></title>
  2335.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5516#msg-5834</link>
  2336.                <description><![CDATA[We&#039;ll review the idea and see what to do about it.]]></description>
  2337.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Michal Rykiert)]]></author>
  2338.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5516#msg-5834</guid>
  2339.                <pubDate>Mon, 16 Sep 2024 15:52:43 +0200</pubDate>
  2340.                            </item>
  2341.                    <item>
  2342.                
  2343.                <title><![CDATA[Edit / read mode in My tasks depending from bps group for particular apps / processes ect. or user settings in account.]]></title>
  2344.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5498#msg-5833</link>
  2345.                <description><![CDATA[Hi Pawe, most clients decide to use quick paths within dedicated reports to perform variety of actions in similar business scenarios. With that said, at least for now, we are going to prioritize other development ideas.]]></description>
  2346.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Michal Rykiert)]]></author>
  2347.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5498#msg-5833</guid>
  2348.                <pubDate>Mon, 16 Sep 2024 15:50:27 +0200</pubDate>
  2349.                            </item>
  2350.                    <item>
  2351.                
  2352.                <title><![CDATA[LSP - Autocompletion in SQL business rules.]]></title>
  2353.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5405#msg-5832</link>
  2354.                <description><![CDATA[I didn&#039;t had my hopes high posting it, that is great news! :)]]></description>
  2355.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Maksymilian Stachowiak)]]></author>
  2356.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5405#msg-5832</guid>
  2357.                <pubDate>Mon, 16 Sep 2024 15:50:13 +0200</pubDate>
  2358.                            </item>
  2359.                    <item>
  2360.                
  2361.                <title><![CDATA[Grouping processes in the application]]></title>
  2362.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5427#msg-5831</link>
  2363.                <description><![CDATA[We&#039;re not excluding a possibility of enhancing Studio with process grouping in the future, however at this point other things are prioritized, especially given we want to introduce a new, web-based Designer Studio :).]]></description>
  2364.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Michal Rykiert)]]></author>
  2365.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5427#msg-5831</guid>
  2366.                <pubDate>Mon, 16 Sep 2024 15:47:28 +0200</pubDate>
  2367.                            </item>
  2368.                    <item>
  2369.                
  2370.                <title><![CDATA[LSP - Autocompletion in SQL business rules.]]></title>
  2371.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5405#msg-5830</link>
  2372.                <description><![CDATA[Hi Maks, we&#039;re working on it. You may expect it to be done in the new, web-based Designer Studio. With that said, it won&#039;t be included in the current, desktop version of DS.]]></description>
  2373.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Michal Rykiert)]]></author>
  2374.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5405#msg-5830</guid>
  2375.                <pubDate>Mon, 16 Sep 2024 15:45:11 +0200</pubDate>
  2376.                            </item>
  2377.                    <item>
  2378.                
  2379.                <title><![CDATA[Attachments menu: Add support for hyperlink]]></title>
  2380.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5377#msg-5829</link>
  2381.                <description><![CDATA[We&#039;re putting it under review. Stay tuned!]]></description>
  2382.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Michal Rykiert)]]></author>
  2383.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5377#msg-5829</guid>
  2384.                <pubDate>Mon, 16 Sep 2024 15:43:14 +0200</pubDate>
  2385.                            </item>
  2386.                    <item>
  2387.                
  2388.                <title><![CDATA[Diagnostic sessions: Custom title]]></title>
  2389.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5370#msg-5828</link>
  2390.                <description><![CDATA[We&#039;re putting it under review. Stay tuned!]]></description>
  2391.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Michal Rykiert)]]></author>
  2392.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5370#msg-5828</guid>
  2393.                <pubDate>Mon, 16 Sep 2024 15:42:23 +0200</pubDate>
  2394.                            </item>
  2395.                    <item>
  2396.                
  2397.                <title><![CDATA[Performance: Data row configuration Only calculate when viewed]]></title>
  2398.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5360#msg-5827</link>
  2399.                <description><![CDATA[It&#039;s an interesting thought, however for now other planned improvements have a higher priority. I&#039;m changing the status to &quot;not now&quot;.]]></description>
  2400.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Michal Rykiert)]]></author>
  2401.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5360#msg-5827</guid>
  2402.                <pubDate>Mon, 16 Sep 2024 15:40:59 +0200</pubDate>
  2403.                            </item>
  2404.                    <item>
  2405.                
  2406.                <title><![CDATA[Security bulettin as excel/csv]]></title>
  2407.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5341#msg-5826</link>
  2408.                <description><![CDATA[I&#039;m marking the topic as done and closed :).]]></description>
  2409.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Michal Rykiert)]]></author>
  2410.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5341#msg-5826</guid>
  2411.                <pubDate>Mon, 16 Sep 2024 15:38:23 +0200</pubDate>
  2412.                            </item>
  2413.                    <item>
  2414.                
  2415.                <title><![CDATA[ToDo List]]></title>
  2416.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5331#msg-5825</link>
  2417.                <description><![CDATA[Hello there,the to-do list feature is by design a quick and simple thing to use. If you need tasks to be assigned, delegated and verified... we are a process platform after all :). What I suggest is to create a supportive process application in WEBCON that would enhance your development cycle exactly as you wish to.]]></description>
  2418.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Michal Rykiert)]]></author>
  2419.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5331#msg-5825</guid>
  2420.                <pubDate>Mon, 16 Sep 2024 15:37:33 +0200</pubDate>
  2421.                            </item>
  2422.                    <item>
  2423.                
  2424.                <title><![CDATA[Default dashboards in the context of user roles]]></title>
  2425.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5310#msg-5824</link>
  2426.                <description><![CDATA[Hey Mike, you may achieve the desired business goal by organizing processes within apps in the Designer Studio.]]></description>
  2427.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Michal Rykiert)]]></author>
  2428.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5310#msg-5824</guid>
  2429.                <pubDate>Mon, 16 Sep 2024 15:33:54 +0200</pubDate>
  2430.                            </item>
  2431.                    <item>
  2432.                
  2433.                <title><![CDATA[Dark Mode and Code Editor]]></title>
  2434.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5291#msg-5823</link>
  2435.                <description><![CDATA[Hi Wojciech, I must admit, you&#039;ll have many advocates here supporting your suggestion as the request for dark mode regularly pops up :).And I&#039;m here to deliver the good news! We&#039;re working on a completely new Designer Studio, and it will have dark mode!We&#039;ll keep everyone posted in the official channels about the plans for new Designer Studio to appear.]]></description>
  2436.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Michal Rykiert)]]></author>
  2437.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5291#msg-5823</guid>
  2438.                <pubDate>Mon, 16 Sep 2024 15:29:47 +0200</pubDate>
  2439.                            </item>
  2440.                    <item>
  2441.                
  2442.                <title><![CDATA[Item list row: Add source information to popup of action context menu]]></title>
  2443.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5257#msg-5822</link>
  2444.                <description><![CDATA[It&#039;s a nice suggestion, we&#039;re putting it under review.]]></description>
  2445.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Michal Rykiert)]]></author>
  2446.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5257#msg-5822</guid>
  2447.                <pubDate>Mon, 16 Sep 2024 15:26:39 +0200</pubDate>
  2448.                            </item>
  2449.                    <item>
  2450.                
  2451.                <title><![CDATA[Environment setting to disable: Timeout actions error: checkout exception occurred]]></title>
  2452.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5248#msg-5821</link>
  2453.                <description><![CDATA[Hey Daniel,to make a long story short, changes within the necessary mechanisms to satisfy your request are highly complex the value added would not justify the effort in our opinion. Therefore, at this point, we&#039;ll prioritize other requests and features.]]></description>
  2454.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Michal Rykiert)]]></author>
  2455.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5248#msg-5821</guid>
  2456.                <pubDate>Mon, 16 Sep 2024 15:25:35 +0200</pubDate>
  2457.                            </item>
  2458.                    <item>
  2459.                
  2460.                <title><![CDATA[SUGGESTION: NEW LAYOUT OPTION FOR DASHBOARD [50%-25%-25%]]]></title>
  2461.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5226#msg-5820</link>
  2462.                <description><![CDATA[Hi Bjorn,I think what&#039;s coming is even better than your original ask :). We&#039;re going to introduce the ability to design dashboards using a grid. So you&#039;ll have much more freedom with the look &amp; feel of your dashboards. You should expect this to happen in the next WEBCON version.]]></description>
  2463.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Michal Rykiert)]]></author>
  2464.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5226#msg-5820</guid>
  2465.                <pubDate>Mon, 16 Sep 2024 15:21:56 +0200</pubDate>
  2466.                            </item>
  2467.                    <item>
  2468.                
  2469.                <title><![CDATA[change Process Import/Configuration grid]]></title>
  2470.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5810#msg-5816</link>
  2471.                <description><![CDATA[No problem ... my topic was merged (few request), but should be split to 6-7 different topics ...Any way I hope the WebCon will change import / export window from &quot;multi-text / (root-nodes) &quot; to few tables with readable data... yes /no ect.]]></description>
  2472.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Paweł Tołoczko)]]></author>
  2473.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5810#msg-5816</guid>
  2474.                <pubDate>Fri, 13 Sep 2024 12:06:38 +0200</pubDate>
  2475.                            </item>
  2476.                    <item>
  2477.                
  2478.                <title><![CDATA[change Process Import/Configuration grid]]></title>
  2479.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5810#msg-5813</link>
  2480.                <description><![CDATA[ok - sorry - I searched for something similar but I didn&#039;t find it ;)]]></description>
  2481.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Jacek Wojnar)]]></author>
  2482.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5810#msg-5813</guid>
  2483.                <pubDate>Fri, 13 Sep 2024 06:50:57 +0200</pubDate>
  2484.                            </item>
  2485.                    <item>
  2486.                
  2487.                <title><![CDATA[change Process Import/Configuration grid]]></title>
  2488.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5810#msg-5812</link>
  2489.                <description><![CDATA[I ageeI mentioned about that herehttps://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4518?messageid=4518]]></description>
  2490.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Paweł Tołoczko)]]></author>
  2491.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5810#msg-5812</guid>
  2492.                <pubDate>Fri, 13 Sep 2024 00:09:15 +0200</pubDate>
  2493.                            </item>
  2494.                    <item>
  2495.                
  2496.                <title><![CDATA[change Process Import/Configuration grid]]></title>
  2497.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5810#msg-5810</link>
  2498.                <description><![CDATA[I would like to propose a change to the Process Import/Configuration grid.It would be great if the names: Data sources, Fields, Constant etc. were in a separate column (if it were possible to sort/filter by this column it would be great :-) ).With many data sources, finding the one I don&#039;t want to import is not easy.]]></description>
  2499.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Jacek Wojnar)]]></author>
  2500.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5810#msg-5810</guid>
  2501.                <pubDate>Thu, 12 Sep 2024 21:25:41 +0200</pubDate>
  2502.                            </item>
  2503.                    <item>
  2504.                
  2505.                <title><![CDATA[HTML in report calculated columns]]></title>
  2506.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5803#msg-5809</link>
  2507.                <description><![CDATA[I was asked exactly about case that you described in the article - displaying comments. Thanks for hint.]]></description>
  2508.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Jacek)]]></author>
  2509.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5803#msg-5809</guid>
  2510.                <pubDate>Thu, 12 Sep 2024 21:19:16 +0200</pubDate>
  2511.                            </item>
  2512.                    <item>
  2513.                
  2514.                <title><![CDATA[Inserting Instance Id variable with single quote]]></title>
  2515.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5519#msg-5808</link>
  2516.                <description><![CDATA[A few weeks later and the same issue again only difference is that it is in another action.I really hope, that this will get introduced. :)]]></description>
  2517.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Daniel Krüger Cosmo Consult)]]></author>
  2518.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5519#msg-5808</guid>
  2519.                <pubDate>Thu, 12 Sep 2024 14:57:56 +0200</pubDate>
  2520.                            </item>
  2521.                    <item>
  2522.                
  2523.                <title><![CDATA[HTML in report calculated columns]]></title>
  2524.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5803#msg-5807</link>
  2525.                <description><![CDATA[I also would prefer that we could use HTML tags in calculated columns.For splitting lines/adding line breaks I found a workaround:https://daniels-notes.de/posts/2024/show-comment-in-reports#styling]]></description>
  2526.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Daniel Krüger Cosmo Consult)]]></author>
  2527.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5803#msg-5807</guid>
  2528.                <pubDate>Thu, 12 Sep 2024 13:46:28 +0200</pubDate>
  2529.                            </item>
  2530.                    <item>
  2531.                
  2532.                <title><![CDATA[HTML in report calculated columns]]></title>
  2533.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5803#msg-5803</link>
  2534.                <description><![CDATA[Hi, I would like to propose the ability to use HTML formatted text in calculated columns of reports. Now HTML tags are displayed as plain text, e.g. we can use only one link in row or not able to split/format text into lines.I remember that there was such possibility in Sharepoint reports and I miss it :)]]></description>
  2535.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Jacek)]]></author>
  2536.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5803#msg-5803</guid>
  2537.                <pubDate>Thu, 12 Sep 2024 12:19:23 +0200</pubDate>
  2538.                            </item>
  2539.                    <item>
  2540.                
  2541.                <title><![CDATA[Article images fix]]></title>
  2542.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5802#msg-5802</link>
  2543.                <description><![CDATA[The article:https://community.webcon.com/posts/post/regular-expressions-business-applications/268/4have missing pictures.BTW: any progress in backlog since 25.08.2021 ?:https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/860?messageid=860]]></description>
  2544.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Paweł Tołoczko)]]></author>
  2545.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5802#msg-5802</guid>
  2546.                <pubDate>Thu, 12 Sep 2024 08:31:38 +0200</pubDate>
  2547.                            </item>
  2548.                    <item>
  2549.                
  2550.                <title><![CDATA[Fourth environment of WEBCON BPS]]></title>
  2551.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5735#msg-5798</link>
  2552.                <description><![CDATA[I forgot to mention that we have an additional licence for this environment, and it&#039;s not like you&#039;re going to run a second TEST on the same licence :)Regards.]]></description>
  2553.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Karol Częczek)]]></author>
  2554.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5735#msg-5798</guid>
  2555.                <pubDate>Wed, 11 Sep 2024 15:19:18 +0200</pubDate>
  2556.                            </item>
  2557.                    <item>
  2558.                
  2559.                <title><![CDATA[Fourth environment of WEBCON BPS]]></title>
  2560.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5735#msg-5797</link>
  2561.                <description><![CDATA[Hi KarolThis is an interesting approach I did not think of. Will have a look at this.Regards]]></description>
  2562.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Markus Jenni)]]></author>
  2563.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5735#msg-5797</guid>
  2564.                <pubDate>Wed, 11 Sep 2024 15:13:49 +0200</pubDate>
  2565.                            </item>
  2566.                    <item>
  2567.                
  2568.                <title><![CDATA[Workflow control actions: Ignore field visibility/editability when setting fields]]></title>
  2569.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5796#msg-5796</link>
  2570.                <description><![CDATA[Hi,I&#039;m currently upgrading processes from 2022 to WEBCON BPS 2024 and encountered another unexpected change.Both &quot;Start a subworkflow&quot; actions &quot;now&quot; verify whether a field is visible. While in one case I didn&#039;t declare two fields as visible in the start step I have a visibility restriction in another.Since the visibility restriction of uses the &#039;Source&#039; field value  (1), which is set by the &quot;Start a subworkflow&quot; action, it&#039;s always false. Therefore the field &#039;Assessment answer&#039; is never visible and it&#039;s value won&#039;t be set.While I really like that the field visibility is applied to the UI as well as REST, I&#039;m confused by this change. When we are using any kind of &quot;workflow control&quot; action I don&#039;t see any reason why the field visibility should be applied. We are modifying the workflow instances from &quot;within&quot; and they are not somehow modified by an external source may it be the UI or REST.Besides the fact that I&#039;m confused about this change, it&#039;s strange that we can disable &quot;Check logged-in user privileges&quot; but are limited by the field visibility. It would be great if one of these changes would be introduced:- If the logged-in user privileges are ignored, then the field visibility should be ignored too.- Add another flag  &quot;Check field visibility&quot;. This would be false for all upgraded workflows and true whenever a new action is added.Edit:I just ran into a similar issue when I used the &quot;Update related workflow instance&quot;. The action tried to update choose fields which have been set to read only.The  result was the following error:Error in On enter action Copy new risk values to project risk. (Step: Completed, path: Complete action)Cannot find value 1 in data sourceBest regards,Daniel]]></description>
  2571.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Daniel Krüger Cosmo Consult)]]></author>
  2572.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5796#msg-5796</guid>
  2573.                <pubDate>Wed, 11 Sep 2024 14:24:45 +0200</pubDate>
  2574.                            </item>
  2575.                    <item>
  2576.                
  2577.                <title><![CDATA[Add attachment: Configuration flag whether attachments should exist]]></title>
  2578.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5795#msg-5795</link>
  2579.                <description><![CDATA[Hi,I&#039;m currently upgrading processes to WEBCON BPS 2024. I was expecting issues with custom JavaScript but encountered also one with the &quot;Add attachment&quot; action.While testing I got this error:Error occurred in add attachment action: Copy attachments.No attachments I&#039;m not sure when, but it seems that WEBCON BPS now checks whether any attachments exist which can be copied over. If they don&#039;t exist an error is thrown. Could we please get a flag to define, that this check should be executed?This would allow upgrading old processes for which this flag would be false by default.Adding the if operator or an execution condition to each Add attachment action is not something I would like to do. Not only because of the effort but because there are now two places which need to be maintained.Here&#039;s a statement to check which processes /automation use the action:SELECT [ACT_ID], ACT_ActionKindID, ACT_Name, case when [ACT_DEFID] is not null then actionProcess.DEF_Name else automationProcess.DEF_Name end  Process, AUTM_NameFROM [dbo].[WFActions] left join WFDefinitions actionProcess on ACT_DEFID = actionProcess.DEF_IDleft join Automations on ACT_AUTMID = AUTM_IDleft join  WFDefinitions automationProcess on AUTM_DEFID =  automationProcess.DEF_IDwhere ACT_ActionKindID = 79/* Only action templates */and ACT_ACTID is null]]></description>
  2580.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Daniel Krüger Cosmo Consult)]]></author>
  2581.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5795#msg-5795</guid>
  2582.                <pubDate>Wed, 11 Sep 2024 12:58:49 +0200</pubDate>
  2583.                            </item>
  2584.                    <item>
  2585.                
  2586.                <title><![CDATA[Adding the [Raw Text] option to business rules.]]></title>
  2587.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5645#msg-5794</link>
  2588.                <description><![CDATA[I&#039;ve just run into this issue again when updating from BPS 2022 to 2024. While there&#039;s a workaround for using business rules in REST actions I have yet to find one when they are used in REST data sources. Workaround for REST actions:- assigning the business rule to a form field - select the form field and switch from text to raw mode by right clicking on it.]]></description>
  2589.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Daniel Krüger Cosmo Consult)]]></author>
  2590.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5645#msg-5794</guid>
  2591.                <pubDate>Wed, 11 Sep 2024 09:19:45 +0200</pubDate>
  2592.                            </item>
  2593.                    <item>
  2594.                
  2595.                <title><![CDATA[Fourth environment of WEBCON BPS]]></title>
  2596.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5735#msg-5793</link>
  2597.                <description><![CDATA[Hi Karol,that&#039;s an interesting approach. I never thought of it. :)My approach was to create an &quot;import&quot; process which makes a snapshot of the data before the import and again one after the import. This way we can check what changed and correct elements if necessary.With BPS 2024 we can integrate the import of the package into this process. :)https://daniels-notes.de/posts/2024/importing-applications-using-an-application#displaying-the-changesRegards,Daniel]]></description>
  2598.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Daniel Krüger Cosmo Consult)]]></author>
  2599.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5735#msg-5793</guid>
  2600.                <pubDate>Wed, 11 Sep 2024 07:33:48 +0200</pubDate>
  2601.                            </item>
  2602.                    <item>
  2603.                
  2604.                <title><![CDATA[[has been clarified] Suggestion: New menu item &#039;Tips &amp; Tricks&#039; -&gt; open for external content]]></title>
  2605.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5718#msg-5784</link>
  2606.                <description><![CDATA[Hi Bjrn,I&#039;d like to include all range of articles related to best practices, proven ideas and also tips &amp; tricks into the knowledge base. From my perspective, if your post is 300 characters but delivers the value for other users (solves a certain case and/or eliminates a pain), it&#039;s suitable for the knowledge base. The section is curated (meaning: we review the posts before publication), but we don&#039;t interfere with the content. Additionally, we describe each knowledge base entry with tags which should make them easier to find and index by Google. Therefore, I&#039;d like to encourage you to post to the knowledge base section. You already have the publishing rights. Info for others willing to contribute: for now, me manually add permissions, so just hit me up, and I&#039;ll give you access as well :).]]></description>
  2607.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Michal Rykiert)]]></author>
  2608.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5718#msg-5784</guid>
  2609.                <pubDate>Tue, 10 Sep 2024 14:10:28 +0200</pubDate>
  2610.                            </item>
  2611.                    <item>
  2612.                
  2613.                <title><![CDATA[Changes to the path configuration view]]></title>
  2614.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5783#msg-5783</link>
  2615.                <description><![CDATA[Hi,I propose to reduce the documentation section by half, and enlarge the bottom sections on rules .Regards.]]></description>
  2616.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Karol Częczek)]]></author>
  2617.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5783#msg-5783</guid>
  2618.                <pubDate>Tue, 10 Sep 2024 13:51:22 +0200</pubDate>
  2619.                            </item>
  2620.                    <item>
  2621.                
  2622.                <title><![CDATA[Fourth environment of WEBCON BPS]]></title>
  2623.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5735#msg-5782</link>
  2624.                <description><![CDATA[Hi MarcusI also work in an environment with 4 instances of webconA minor problem is setting the fourth unique environment type, we have 2 times TEST.The only problem is importing to this environment if the data sources, constants have a different configuration, connection, than the second TEST.I added copies of the TEMP_WFDataConnections and TEMP_WFEnvironmentGlobalVariable tables.Which I periodically feed with data if after migration any connections, constants are different for these 2 environments.During the next migration of processes, the trigger set on the migration history column (which changes after migration) calls a job that overwrites the table with the correct data that I fed earlier.it works quite well, you have to remember to stick to global constants so as not to overwrite local ones in the process (too much work with this), or instead of constants add business rules, etc. You also have to feed these local tables TEMP_WFDataConnections and TEMP_WFEnvironmentGlobalVariable from time to time if after migration new sources, constants, different in the context of configuration for TEST - TEST are addedRegrds]]></description>
  2625.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Karol Częczek)]]></author>
  2626.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5735#msg-5782</guid>
  2627.                <pubDate>Tue, 10 Sep 2024 13:41:58 +0200</pubDate>
  2628.                            </item>
  2629.                    <item>
  2630.                
  2631.                <title><![CDATA[Increase the length limit of regex validation.]]></title>
  2632.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/860#msg-5775</link>
  2633.                <description><![CDATA[In webcon 2022.1.4.404 you don&#039;t have prompt like you, but it just it cut length of &quot;code&quot;... [code]^[0-2]{1}[0-9]{1}:[0-5]{1}[0-9]{1}-[0-2]{1}[0-9]{1}:[0-5]{1}[0-9]{1}$[/code]but this is to long :/[code]^((0[0-9]|1[0-9]|2[0-2]):[0-5][0-9]-(0[0-9]|1[0-9]|2[0-3]):[0-5][0-9])|(23:00-23:[01-5][0-9]|23:00-23:00)$[/code]---edit--BTW: https://community.webcon.com/posts/post/regular-expressions-business-applications/268/4the article have got missing pictures ...]]></description>
  2634.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Paweł Tołoczko)]]></author>
  2635.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/860#msg-5775</guid>
  2636.                <pubDate>Mon, 09 Sep 2024 06:25:29 +0200</pubDate>
  2637.                            </item>
  2638.                    <item>
  2639.                
  2640.                <title><![CDATA[Autocomplete: Support for HTML in Popup]]></title>
  2641.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5772#msg-5772</link>
  2642.                <description><![CDATA[Hi,in my opinion it would be really great, if HTML tags would be supported in the autocomplete popup.In this case I&#039;m using a BPS internal view and the explanation is a multiline text field of type &quot;rich&quot;.Best regards,Daniel]]></description>
  2643.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Daniel Krüger Cosmo Consult)]]></author>
  2644.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5772#msg-5772</guid>
  2645.                <pubDate>Fri, 06 Sep 2024 14:36:22 +0200</pubDate>
  2646.                            </item>
  2647.                    <item>
  2648.                
  2649.                <title><![CDATA[Folders in attachments]]></title>
  2650.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5758#msg-5758</link>
  2651.                <description><![CDATA[Dear Community,Id like to propose an idea: adding the ability to create folders (not categories currently available) in the attachments area. This would allow users to better organize multiple attachments in a way that suits their needs.Your comments are more than welcome.]]></description>
  2652.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Adam Hatak)]]></author>
  2653.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5758#msg-5758</guid>
  2654.                <pubDate>Thu, 05 Sep 2024 12:32:41 +0200</pubDate>
  2655.                            </item>
  2656.                    <item>
  2657.                
  2658.                <title><![CDATA[WEBCON BPS 2024: Duplicate effort/error prone when report tiles with links are used]]></title>
  2659.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5749#msg-5749</link>
  2660.                <description><![CDATA[Hi,when you want to add a new new report tile with a link to the &quot;details&quot; in WEBCON BPS 2024 you have to:1) Choose a data source 2) Choose an existing reportThe current implementation forces us to create the data source twice. While the effort for the data source creation may be neglectable, I&#039;m quite sure that a lot of us will forget to update both data sources. Especially because it will be rare that report tiles need to be updated and therefore we will not be used to it.It would be great if the behavior could be changed to either:1) Allow the selection of existing reports as a data source2) Define the view in the report tile configurationI would prefer the first option so that we can still use mass actions, quick paths and the like.Btw. does anyone use report tiles without a link? If I see a number I want to go to page where I can see the details.Best regards,Daniel]]></description>
  2661.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Daniel Krüger Cosmo Consult)]]></author>
  2662.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5749#msg-5749</guid>
  2663.                <pubDate>Wed, 04 Sep 2024 07:22:26 +0200</pubDate>
  2664.                            </item>
  2665.                    <item>
  2666.                
  2667.                <title><![CDATA[Fourth environment of WEBCON BPS]]></title>
  2668.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5735#msg-5742</link>
  2669.                <description><![CDATA[We have a similar setup. The reason for this is not that they are large projects but we have regulatory &quot;requirements&quot;:- DevelopmentBreaking and fixing stuff :)- Informal testWe can easily deploy changes from dev here- Formal test / Validation:Deployment and tests needs to be documented s- Production]]></description>
  2670.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Daniel Krüger Cosmo Consult)]]></author>
  2671.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5735#msg-5742</guid>
  2672.                <pubDate>Tue, 03 Sep 2024 12:12:23 +0200</pubDate>
  2673.                            </item>
  2674.                    <item>
  2675.                
  2676.                <title><![CDATA[Fourth environment of WEBCON BPS]]></title>
  2677.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5735#msg-5735</link>
  2678.                <description><![CDATA[Coming from developing individual web applications, for large projects, it would be practical to have a fourth environment to run WEBCON BPS Instead of having only DEV/TEST/PROD, we would like to have DEV/TEST/INTEGRATION/PROD. or similar. DEV/TEST would be in-house to develop and test the applications, and INT/PROD would be on the client&#039;s Infrastructure.This would make change management and testing much easier and closer to our internal development guidelines.Are there others working on very large projects, where this setup would be beneficiary.]]></description>
  2679.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Markus Jenni)]]></author>
  2680.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5735#msg-5735</guid>
  2681.                <pubDate>Tue, 03 Sep 2024 08:35:54 +0200</pubDate>
  2682.                            </item>
  2683.                    <item>
  2684.                
  2685.                <title><![CDATA[IS IN - vertical layout]]></title>
  2686.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5731#msg-5731</link>
  2687.                <description><![CDATA[Hi,I would like to submit an idea related to:- Daniel&#039;s post: https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/329?messageid=329- Maks&#039; post: https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5057?messageid=5057it would be great if the IS IN function has vertical layout (screenshot)]]></description>
  2688.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Jacek Wojnar)]]></author>
  2689.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5731#msg-5731</guid>
  2690.                <pubDate>Mon, 02 Sep 2024 16:47:18 +0200</pubDate>
  2691.                            </item>
  2692.                    <item>
  2693.                
  2694.                <title><![CDATA[Attachment Category set custom sortation / order]]></title>
  2695.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5727#msg-5727</link>
  2696.                <description><![CDATA[Custom way to sort Attachments category...I Have category list:ID=1 Name starts from &quot;P&quot;ID=2 Name starts from &quot;U&quot;ID=3 Name starts from &quot;A&quot;I would like to sort category by &quot;ID of Category&quot; not by Category Name Letter / number ..work around is now:add 1. 2. 3. to order names or use java script ...related topic:https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5721]]></description>
  2697.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Paweł Tołoczko)]]></author>
  2698.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5727#msg-5727</guid>
  2699.                <pubDate>Mon, 02 Sep 2024 14:11:34 +0200</pubDate>
  2700.                            </item>
  2701.                    <item>
  2702.                
  2703.                <title><![CDATA[Related attachments: Column names are confusing]]></title>
  2704.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5720#msg-5720</link>
  2705.                <description><![CDATA[Hi,at the moment the column &quot;ElementName&quot; is used as a category /subfolder while the column &quot;Category&quot; is used to display the filename. select  Top 3 ATT_ID  , ATT_FileType as ElementName  , ATT_Name as CategoryI&#039;m not using these option very often but each time I&#039;m looking at the names in the info icon and get confused.My suggestion would be to add alias and update the documentation, so that only the alias would be used. &quot;ElementName&quot; would get the alias &quot;Subfolder&quot;&quot;Category&quot; would be &quot;Filename&quot;.This way:- We won&#039;t break the old SQL statements- There&#039;s no need to create a migration script.- New users wont be confused.Best regards,Daniel]]></description>
  2706.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Daniel Krüger Cosmo Consult)]]></author>
  2707.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5720#msg-5720</guid>
  2708.                <pubDate>Sun, 01 Sep 2024 15:57:52 +0200</pubDate>
  2709.                            </item>
  2710.                    <item>
  2711.                
  2712.                <title><![CDATA[[has been clarified] Suggestion: New menu item &#039;Tips &amp; Tricks&#039; -&gt; open for external content]]></title>
  2713.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5718#msg-5718</link>
  2714.                <description><![CDATA[Although there is a &#039;Tips &amp; Tricks&#039; category in the forum, the forum is primarily used for asking questions. Searching for specific tips and tricks is not always optimal.My suggestion is to create a separate section for this, with the option to allow external contributions. This could either be regulated like the Knowledge Base or open like the forum. Ideally, this section could include subcategories for specific topics. I believe this would be highly beneficial, especially for newer WEBCON users. Additionally, the threshold for contributing would not be as high as it is for a Knowledge Base article, which usually requires a certain level of detail. Simple contributions like &#039;Displaying a Google Maps link in a Data Table&#039;, &#039;Coloring a Data Table entry from the previous day excluding weekends&#039;, &#039;Displaying graphics in a report&#039;, or &#039;Limiting the maximum number of text lines in a multiline text field using RegEx&#039; would be sufficient. Sometimes, just three sentences and a screenshot are enough. What do others think?Best Regards,Bjoern Poller]]></description>
  2715.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Bjoern Poller)]]></author>
  2716.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5718#msg-5718</guid>
  2717.                <pubDate>Fri, 30 Aug 2024 17:23:25 +0200</pubDate>
  2718.                            </item>
  2719.                    <item>
  2720.                
  2721.                <title><![CDATA[Multiple lines of text in item list - characters limit]]></title>
  2722.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/2462#msg-5717</link>
  2723.                <description><![CDATA[Hi Lukasz,I just checked and I was able to save over 12,000 characters without any problems. Version 2023.1.2]]></description>
  2724.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Jacek Wojnar)]]></author>
  2725.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/2462#msg-5717</guid>
  2726.                <pubDate>Fri, 30 Aug 2024 16:10:40 +0200</pubDate>
  2727.                            </item>
  2728.                    <item>
  2729.                
  2730.                <title><![CDATA[Copy field value to clipboard]]></title>
  2731.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5698#msg-5716</link>
  2732.                <description><![CDATA[interesting idea :-)it would also be great if we could specify the formatting of the copied value for fields like number/date (especially useful when copying to other systems that may have different formatting). Maybe through a business rule (then there would be complete freedom and we could also concat something to another field :-) )]]></description>
  2733.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Jacek Wojnar)]]></author>
  2734.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5698#msg-5716</guid>
  2735.                <pubDate>Fri, 30 Aug 2024 16:05:30 +0200</pubDate>
  2736.                            </item>
  2737.                    <item>
  2738.                
  2739.                <title><![CDATA[Environment setting to disable: Timeout actions error: checkout exception occurred]]></title>
  2740.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5248#msg-5714</link>
  2741.                <description><![CDATA[Hi Daniel,thank you for the explanation!Kind regards,Klaus]]></description>
  2742.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Klaus Seidler)]]></author>
  2743.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5248#msg-5714</guid>
  2744.                <pubDate>Fri, 30 Aug 2024 12:58:04 +0200</pubDate>
  2745.                            </item>
  2746.                    <item>
  2747.                
  2748.                <title><![CDATA[Environment setting to disable: Timeout actions error: checkout exception occurred]]></title>
  2749.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5248#msg-5712</link>
  2750.                <description><![CDATA[Hi Klaus,you are right, an element is checked out, when it is opened in edit mode. Similar to the document checkout in SharePoint.If you cancel the editing the checkout will be revoked immediately. If you only close the tab or navigate somewhere else the checkout will remain a while. The system verifies whether the user has the form currently open in a periodic interval. When the element is checked out by a user this error happens. In your case your actions and the timeout execution may have overlapped.Best regards,Daniel]]></description>
  2751.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Daniel Krüger Cosmo Consult)]]></author>
  2752.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5248#msg-5712</guid>
  2753.                <pubDate>Fri, 30 Aug 2024 11:35:32 +0200</pubDate>
  2754.                            </item>
  2755.                    <item>
  2756.                
  2757.                <title><![CDATA[Environment setting to disable: Timeout actions error: checkout exception occurred]]></title>
  2758.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5248#msg-5705</link>
  2759.                <description><![CDATA[Hi Daniel,I just ran across this error again.Can you explain we what &quot;Check out&quot; means? I expected it would be that the Element is in &quot;edit&quot; mode. But I definitely aborted &quot;edit&quot; before I closed it and the error happened still.Kind regards, Klaus]]></description>
  2760.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Klaus Seidler)]]></author>
  2761.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5248#msg-5705</guid>
  2762.                <pubDate>Thu, 29 Aug 2024 16:46:32 +0200</pubDate>
  2763.                            </item>
  2764.                    <item>
  2765.                
  2766.                <title><![CDATA[WEBCON BPS Designer Studio better support for screen scaling]]></title>
  2767.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5703#msg-5703</link>
  2768.                <description><![CDATA[Dear Community, Ive recently noticed some issues when using WEBCON BPS Designer Studio on a 4K resolution display with scaling enabled (at 125% or 150%). While the text in the application appears to scale correctly, many of the graphical elements are either very small (not scaled) or blurry (improperly scaled).Im attaching a screenshot to show how it looks on a Retina display (not even a 4K res).Is there any possibility of improving support for such scenarios?]]></description>
  2769.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Adam Hatak)]]></author>
  2770.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5703#msg-5703</guid>
  2771.                <pubDate>Thu, 29 Aug 2024 09:48:04 +0200</pubDate>
  2772.                            </item>
  2773.                    <item>
  2774.                
  2775.                <title><![CDATA[Copy field value to clipboard]]></title>
  2776.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5698#msg-5698</link>
  2777.                <description><![CDATA[Dear Community,I would like to propose a change in WEBCON BPS to improve the ease of copying field values to the clipboard. This could be introduced as an optional setting within the field options in BPS Designer Studio.I particularly like how this feature is implemented in the Azure portal: a &quot;Copy&quot; icon remains hidden until you hover over the field, at which point it appears, allowing for quick copying to the clipboard. I&#039;ve attached an example image to illustrate how it works.I believe this enhancement would significantly speed up the process compared to manually selecting and copying text.I&#039;m hopeful that this suggestion will find support among many of you!]]></description>
  2778.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Adam Hatak)]]></author>
  2779.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5698#msg-5698</guid>
  2780.                <pubDate>Wed, 28 Aug 2024 08:00:28 +0200</pubDate>
  2781.                            </item>
  2782.                    <item>
  2783.                
  2784.                <title><![CDATA[.]]></title>
  2785.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5686#msg-5686</link>
  2786.                <description><![CDATA[.]]></description>
  2787.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (nobody)]]></author>
  2788.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5686#msg-5686</guid>
  2789.                <pubDate>Tue, 27 Aug 2024 08:59:56 +0200</pubDate>
  2790.                            </item>
  2791.                    <item>
  2792.                
  2793.                <title><![CDATA[Last comment on reports]]></title>
  2794.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4357#msg-5684</link>
  2795.                <description><![CDATA[Just in case someone is finding this post via the search, here&#039;s an option to display those without updating to 2024. https://daniels-notes.de/posts/2024/show-comment-in-reports]]></description>
  2796.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Daniel Krüger Cosmo Consult)]]></author>
  2797.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4357#msg-5684</guid>
  2798.                <pubDate>Mon, 26 Aug 2024 22:50:38 +0200</pubDate>
  2799.                            </item>
  2800.                    <item>
  2801.                
  2802.                <title><![CDATA[Adding the [Raw Text] option to business rules.]]></title>
  2803.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5645#msg-5663</link>
  2804.                <description><![CDATA[I don&#039;t mind where, but I ___need___ the raw value. :)]]></description>
  2805.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Daniel Krüger Cosmo Consult)]]></author>
  2806.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5645#msg-5663</guid>
  2807.                <pubDate>Fri, 23 Aug 2024 15:25:50 +0200</pubDate>
  2808.                            </item>
  2809.                    <item>
  2810.                
  2811.                <title><![CDATA[Multiple lines of text in item list - characters limit]]></title>
  2812.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/2462#msg-5661</link>
  2813.                <description><![CDATA[Hi, we have the same problem. Is it really done? In what version?]]></description>
  2814.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (LukaszJanicki)]]></author>
  2815.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/2462#msg-5661</guid>
  2816.                <pubDate>Fri, 23 Aug 2024 15:09:14 +0200</pubDate>
  2817.                            </item>
  2818.                    <item>
  2819.                
  2820.                <title><![CDATA[Copy link to clipboard - but rich!]]></title>
  2821.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5648#msg-5651</link>
  2822.                <description><![CDATA[We have policy enforcing only Edge, no other browsers are allowed in company, so changing one is not an option.Firefox is the only one not running chromium so that might be the reason of different behavior.]]></description>
  2823.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Maksymilian Stachowiak)]]></author>
  2824.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5648#msg-5651</guid>
  2825.                <pubDate>Fri, 23 Aug 2024 11:00:41 +0200</pubDate>
  2826.                            </item>
  2827.                    <item>
  2828.                
  2829.                <title><![CDATA[Copy link to clipboard - but rich!]]></title>
  2830.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5648#msg-5650</link>
  2831.                <description><![CDATA[I had that problem with browsers:IE/EDGE &gt;&gt; copy link under &quot;name=signature&quot; Firefox - copy only URL address..  when I paste to Teams.because I prefer FF then .. i ignored that &quot;issue&quot;]]></description>
  2832.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Paweł Tołoczko)]]></author>
  2833.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5648#msg-5650</guid>
  2834.                <pubDate>Fri, 23 Aug 2024 10:57:19 +0200</pubDate>
  2835.                            </item>
  2836.                    <item>
  2837.                
  2838.                <title><![CDATA[Adding the [Raw Text] option to business rules.]]></title>
  2839.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5645#msg-5649</link>
  2840.                <description><![CDATA[I would rather have an option to select it when putting the business rule somewhere, but I&#039;m up for anything that will allow selecting behavior.I&#039;m currently using a technical field on the form, to avoid url encoding.I thought there was similar user voice in the past but can&#039;t find it.]]></description>
  2841.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Maksymilian Stachowiak)]]></author>
  2842.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5645#msg-5649</guid>
  2843.                <pubDate>Fri, 23 Aug 2024 08:48:37 +0200</pubDate>
  2844.                            </item>
  2845.                    <item>
  2846.                
  2847.                <title><![CDATA[Copy link to clipboard - but rich!]]></title>
  2848.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5648#msg-5648</link>
  2849.                <description><![CDATA[Hi everyone,I&#039;ve got today a question from my business side if there is a possibility to change how &#039;Coply link to clipboard&#039; button works.Right now it copies raw URL to the element, so after pasting it into teams it&#039;s visible as raw URL.When you copy URL from the browser search bar, it&#039;s being pasted as formatted link and it&#039;s presented as {Signature} with underscore, and it&#039;s blue - so a link.I know i could make a workaround with a custom HTML control on the form, but it would be nice to have it out of the box.Could we polish it a bit? :)]]></description>
  2850.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Maksymilian Stachowiak)]]></author>
  2851.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5648#msg-5648</guid>
  2852.                <pubDate>Fri, 23 Aug 2024 08:41:02 +0200</pubDate>
  2853.                            </item>
  2854.                    <item>
  2855.                
  2856.                <title><![CDATA[Gantt chart as native report type]]></title>
  2857.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5141#msg-5647</link>
  2858.                <description><![CDATA[My vote is here.]]></description>
  2859.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Aleš Jurak)]]></author>
  2860.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5141#msg-5647</guid>
  2861.                <pubDate>Thu, 22 Aug 2024 18:51:58 +0200</pubDate>
  2862.                            </item>
  2863.                    <item>
  2864.                
  2865.                <title><![CDATA[Feature: Delete Row (Item List)]]></title>
  2866.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/1739#msg-5646</link>
  2867.                <description><![CDATA[HI Daniel,Does your plugin works?I&#039;m trying to add it in Webcon but it mentions that is missing some files]]></description>
  2868.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Andreia Correia)]]></author>
  2869.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/1739#msg-5646</guid>
  2870.                <pubDate>Thu, 22 Aug 2024 16:50:42 +0200</pubDate>
  2871.                            </item>
  2872.                    <item>
  2873.                
  2874.                <title><![CDATA[Adding the [Raw Text] option to business rules.]]></title>
  2875.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5645#msg-5645</link>
  2876.                <description><![CDATA[Hi,It will by werry usefull to have this option in business rules.Regards.]]></description>
  2877.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Karol Częczek)]]></author>
  2878.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5645#msg-5645</guid>
  2879.                <pubDate>Thu, 22 Aug 2024 14:21:51 +0200</pubDate>
  2880.                            </item>
  2881.                    <item>
  2882.                
  2883.                <title><![CDATA[Data sources TAB in Application  - add column with Access to data in the context of system account]]></title>
  2884.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5581#msg-5581</link>
  2885.                <description><![CDATA[Data sources TAB in Application  - add column with &quot;Access to data in the context of system account&quot;NO I need to click one by one to check if is marked or in each attribute &quot;arrow&quot; next to data source and jump to data source and then check is picked ... (in some scenario arrow is not active ...so Application .. then the data source .. pick proper one and then check ... )Could be easier to see that option in data source Tab(I&#039;m in webcon 2022.1.4.404 but probably in 2024 is still missing)]]></description>
  2886.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Paweł Tołoczko)]]></author>
  2887.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5581#msg-5581</guid>
  2888.                <pubDate>Wed, 14 Aug 2024 10:27:47 +0200</pubDate>
  2889.                            </item>
  2890.                    <item>
  2891.                
  2892.                <title><![CDATA[ToDo List]]></title>
  2893.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5331#msg-5567</link>
  2894.                <description><![CDATA[I agree with you here when the number of people working for a given company can afford the cost of an additional tool and its license. In this case, if the company has, for example, two people, a specialized license for tasks seems to be an unnecessary expense, since WebCon has already introduced the possibility of entering tasks. The expansion could be very valuable for smaller developers]]></description>
  2895.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (AlidEk)]]></author>
  2896.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5331#msg-5567</guid>
  2897.                <pubDate>Sun, 11 Aug 2024 18:25:38 +0200</pubDate>
  2898.                            </item>
  2899.                    <item>
  2900.                
  2901.                <title><![CDATA[Merge WORD / JPGs / PNGs and save as PDFs and few PDFs save as PDF file as native automation]]></title>
  2902.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4915#msg-5564</link>
  2903.                <description><![CDATA[Will you also be carrying out the action of splitting one PDF containing, for example, 10 pages into 10 individual PDFs? In other words, splitting the document?]]></description>
  2904.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Krystian Golik)]]></author>
  2905.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4915#msg-5564</guid>
  2906.                <pubDate>Fri, 09 Aug 2024 15:44:19 +0200</pubDate>
  2907.                            </item>
  2908.                    <item>
  2909.                
  2910.                <title><![CDATA[Break with error operator  - possibility to use multi lines in Operator configuration]]></title>
  2911.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5530#msg-5563</link>
  2912.                <description><![CDATA[ok - now I understand.you would like a larger (multi-line) window to enter the message :-)Yes, that would be a good change.]]></description>
  2913.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Jacek Wojnar)]]></author>
  2914.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5530#msg-5563</guid>
  2915.                <pubDate>Fri, 09 Aug 2024 13:43:39 +0200</pubDate>
  2916.                            </item>
  2917.                    <item>
  2918.                
  2919.                <title><![CDATA[Break with error operator  - possibility to use multi lines in Operator configuration]]></title>
  2920.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5530#msg-5562</link>
  2921.                <description><![CDATA[Ok, Maybe I was not clear Html is working but ...you have got 1 line ....to put all code ...I would like to have multi lines instead one line box and type with  and Webon interpreter skip  character and I can makethat:[code=HTML]Podana data zakoczeniamusi by wiksza o ustalon warto dniod Daty zgoszenia.Kolor Czerwony daty wiadczy,o za krtkim czasie na ukoczenie niezgodnoci.[/code]not that[code=HTML]Podana data zakoczeniamusi by wiksza o ustalon warto dniod Daty zgoszenia.Kolor Czerwony daty wiadczy,o za krtkim czasie na ukoczenie niezgodnoci.[/code]HTML is working but is not readable ...]]></description>
  2922.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Paweł Tołoczko)]]></author>
  2923.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5530#msg-5562</guid>
  2924.                <pubDate>Fri, 09 Aug 2024 13:40:48 +0200</pubDate>
  2925.                            </item>
  2926.                    <item>
  2927.                
  2928.                <title><![CDATA[Tool tip for path description - HTML tags acceptation]]></title>
  2929.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5558#msg-5561</link>
  2930.                <description><![CDATA[Hi,I haven&#039;t tested it, but it looks like it should work from version 2023.1.3.202--- edit ---Sorry - I just read that it&#039;s about the description of the path and not the step :/sorry for the confusion - but maybe WEBCON fixed that too ;)]]></description>
  2931.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Jacek Wojnar)]]></author>
  2932.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5558#msg-5561</guid>
  2933.                <pubDate>Fri, 09 Aug 2024 12:20:11 +0200</pubDate>
  2934.                            </item>
  2935.                    <item>
  2936.                
  2937.                <title><![CDATA[Break with error operator  - possibility to use multi lines in Operator configuration]]></title>
  2938.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5530#msg-5560</link>
  2939.                <description><![CDATA[Hi,I checked and it seems to work on my version (2023 R1). Try adding the  tagexample in attachment]]></description>
  2940.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Jacek Wojnar)]]></author>
  2941.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5530#msg-5560</guid>
  2942.                <pubDate>Fri, 09 Aug 2024 12:10:20 +0200</pubDate>
  2943.                            </item>
  2944.                    <item>
  2945.                
  2946.                <title><![CDATA[Security bulettin as excel/csv]]></title>
  2947.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5341#msg-5559</link>
  2948.                <description><![CDATA[Thanks, I just noticed it myself.  :)Unfortunately I don&#039;t receive any notifications, also everything is activated. :(]]></description>
  2949.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Daniel Krüger Cosmo Consult)]]></author>
  2950.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5341#msg-5559</guid>
  2951.                <pubDate>Fri, 09 Aug 2024 11:39:51 +0200</pubDate>
  2952.                            </item>
  2953.                    <item>
  2954.                
  2955.                <title><![CDATA[Tool tip for path description - HTML tags acceptation]]></title>
  2956.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5558#msg-5558</link>
  2957.                <description><![CDATA[Tool tip for path description - HTML tags acceptation ...so big &quot;field&quot; ... so much information can &quot;absorb&quot; ... and no HTML tags formatting :/]]></description>
  2958.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Paweł Tołoczko)]]></author>
  2959.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5558#msg-5558</guid>
  2960.                <pubDate>Fri, 09 Aug 2024 10:29:57 +0200</pubDate>
  2961.                            </item>
  2962.                    <item>
  2963.                
  2964.                <title><![CDATA[Allow to overwrite existing Pdf when converting a Word document to Pdf]]></title>
  2965.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4917#msg-5557</link>
  2966.                <description><![CDATA[Update: The feature is planned to be released in R2 2024. For now, I&#039;m changing the status to &quot;in backlog&quot;.]]></description>
  2967.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Michal Rykiert)]]></author>
  2968.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4917#msg-5557</guid>
  2969.                <pubDate>Thu, 08 Aug 2024 14:43:41 +0200</pubDate>
  2970.                            </item>
  2971.                    <item>
  2972.                
  2973.                <title><![CDATA[Merge WORD / JPGs / PNGs and save as PDFs and few PDFs save as PDF file as native automation]]></title>
  2974.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4915#msg-5555</link>
  2975.                <description><![CDATA[Great !]]></description>
  2976.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Paweł Tołoczko)]]></author>
  2977.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4915#msg-5555</guid>
  2978.                <pubDate>Thu, 08 Aug 2024 14:28:55 +0200</pubDate>
  2979.                            </item>
  2980.                    <item>
  2981.                
  2982.                <title><![CDATA[Merge WORD / JPGs / PNGs and save as PDFs and few PDFs save as PDF file as native automation]]></title>
  2983.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4915#msg-5554</link>
  2984.                <description><![CDATA[Positive update! We have this feature planned for 2024 R2. For now I&#039;m changing to &quot;in backlog&quot; status :).]]></description>
  2985.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Michal Rykiert)]]></author>
  2986.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4915#msg-5554</guid>
  2987.                <pubDate>Thu, 08 Aug 2024 11:32:45 +0200</pubDate>
  2988.                            </item>
  2989.                    <item>
  2990.                
  2991.                <title><![CDATA[Wishlist: Web push notifications!]]></title>
  2992.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5547#msg-5547</link>
  2993.                <description><![CDATA[No more (or much less) email notifications FTW! THX! :)]]></description>
  2994.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Waldemar Gajda)]]></author>
  2995.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5547#msg-5547</guid>
  2996.                <pubDate>Tue, 06 Aug 2024 21:32:51 +0200</pubDate>
  2997.                            </item>
  2998.                    <item>
  2999.                
  3000.                <title><![CDATA[Inserting Instance Id variable with single quote]]></title>
  3001.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5519#msg-5537</link>
  3002.                <description><![CDATA[Hi,I won&#039;t count how many times this hit me straight in my face, everything works fine until it hits production, that&#039;s the worst feeling.I&#039;d love to see some improvements in this case, not sure if with single quotes, but it seems good enough, as I&#039;m always putting them anyway.]]></description>
  3003.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Maksymilian Stachowiak)]]></author>
  3004.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5519#msg-5537</guid>
  3005.                <pubDate>Tue, 06 Aug 2024 13:20:48 +0200</pubDate>
  3006.                            </item>
  3007.                    <item>
  3008.                
  3009.                <title><![CDATA[Colorize/Highlight process user privilege if form type privileges are used]]></title>
  3010.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5516#msg-5536</link>
  3011.                <description><![CDATA[Hi,Personally i don&#039;t feel a need to change it.Im defaulting to set permissions on lowest level, which is workflow/form. So in my case it will always be red :)This gives more control over the permissions, and in case of creating a new form / workflow users won&#039;t get permissions from process by default - this could be easily forgotten.I just feel that this way is &#039;safer&#039;.I&#039;m not against the change, but wanted to share some different perspective ;)]]></description>
  3012.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Maksymilian Stachowiak)]]></author>
  3013.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5516#msg-5536</guid>
  3014.                <pubDate>Tue, 06 Aug 2024 13:16:20 +0200</pubDate>
  3015.                            </item>
  3016.                    <item>
  3017.                
  3018.                <title><![CDATA[Break with error operator  - possibility to use multi lines in Operator configuration]]></title>
  3019.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5530#msg-5530</link>
  3020.                <description><![CDATA[Break with error - possibility to use multi line in &quot;operator&quot;I tested few scenarios with multi text and with HTML tags is possible to use HTML tag - this is GOODbut ... multi line is missing :/ and you need to put everything in one line .... is not user friendly and if you have  in prepared &quot;text&quot;  then ... the operator in &quot;text box&quot; is skipped all &quot;text&quot; after P.S.Could be nice to add (mention) in help or any other doc. that you can use HTML tags ...I&#039;m using 2022.1.4.404,  but probably in 2024 R1 is the same ...In attachments - Validation vs &quot;Brake with error &quot;]]></description>
  3021.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Paweł Tołoczko)]]></author>
  3022.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5530#msg-5530</guid>
  3023.                <pubDate>Tue, 06 Aug 2024 10:12:47 +0200</pubDate>
  3024.                            </item>
  3025.                    <item>
  3026.                
  3027.                <title><![CDATA[Inserting Instance Id variable with single quote]]></title>
  3028.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5519#msg-5519</link>
  3029.                <description><![CDATA[Hi,this may sound strange, but so was the reason, why I&#039;m proposing this.My suggestion is that the expression editor for a SQL command inserts the instance id variable in a way:Currently it is inserted as: {WFD_ID}My suggestion is that it is inserted within single quotes: &#039;{WFD_ID}&#039;The reason for this is, that it would prevent errors which may only surface in production.This is the issue what I encountered.A process was tested with a test protocol and transported from validation environment  to production.The process worked for a while just fine, than it failed with the error:** The current transaction cannot be committed and cannot support operations that write to the log file. Roll back the transaction **Digging deeper brought up the actual error: **  Conversion failed while converting value &#039;xxx&#039; to integer **The root cause was that I forgot to add the single quotes in a where condition using the id of a choose fieldWrong statement:  and {WFCONCOL_ID:544} = {WFD_ID}Correct statement as of WEBCON BPS 2023 with the calculated id columns: and {WFCONCOL_ID:544} = &#039;{WFD_ID}&#039;The big question is, why was it working in the first place and only failed in production?The production database contains way more data and the SQL server decided to execute the query differently. Test system: The index of the choose column wasn&#039;t used, which &quot;magically&quot; allowed the query to work.Production system: The index of the choose column was used which contains text and integer and the query fails.While I&#039;m aware, that adding the single quotes may lead to:- A slower execution, if the variable is used in other cases, where no casting would be necessary- Manual removing the single quotes, if this would break the existing statementI prefer a slower execution and an actual error than an error popping up at some point and explaining it to a customer. If an error happens ones, what can be done to prevent it in the future and what needs to be done now, to verify that the same error hasn&#039;t been made in other cases?Of course, this won&#039;t actually prevent an error, but this change will make it less likely. I&#039;m wondering whether all variables from the values tab should be inserted with single quotes. I know a lot of other situations, where I forgot to add them but at least they caused an error immediately. :)Best regards,Daniel]]></description>
  3030.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Daniel Krüger Cosmo Consult)]]></author>
  3031.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5519#msg-5519</guid>
  3032.                <pubDate>Mon, 05 Aug 2024 15:58:35 +0200</pubDate>
  3033.                            </item>
  3034.                    <item>
  3035.                
  3036.                <title><![CDATA[Colorize/Highlight process user privilege if form type privileges are used]]></title>
  3037.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5516#msg-5516</link>
  3038.                <description><![CDATA[Hi,in my opinion it would be a really helpful, when the &#039;user privileges&#039; tab on the process is displayed in red if any form type privileges are defined.I would use the color red as it&#039;s used in other cases, where the inheritance is broken like with forms.. Even so this is not strictly inheritance with the user privileges it will help to realize that there may be different settings.In my case I came back after my vacation and was wondering why the hell the customer could still work also no privileges had been defined on the process. They did exist before my vacation. It took me longer than I like to admit until I thought of form type privileges. After I realized it I remembered a discussion that they may be moved from the process to form type level.Best regards, Daniel]]></description>
  3039.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Daniel Krüger Cosmo Consult)]]></author>
  3040.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5516#msg-5516</guid>
  3041.                <pubDate>Mon, 05 Aug 2024 15:18:24 +0200</pubDate>
  3042.                            </item>
  3043.                    <item>
  3044.                
  3045.                <title><![CDATA[Edit / read mode in My tasks depending from bps group for particular apps / processes ect. or user settings in account.]]></title>
  3046.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5498#msg-5498</link>
  3047.                <description><![CDATA[&quot;Edit&quot; / &quot;read&quot; mode in &quot;My tasks&quot; depending from bps group for particular apps / processes ect. or user settings in account.possibility to set behave to particular group of users (webcon group)if some one is in that group - read only - need to &quot;click edit&quot; to editothers - edit as standardor ... (maybe better) In User Account - option to pick - do you wish to have my tasks in edit mode? (yes/no/leave default for app)Reason - because first new - is in edit mode and .. &quot;disappears&quot; in new ones .. because is not new anymore ... if you come back to new ones is not there .....In my company  Purchase Dep have problem when they have some:Invoices / Purchase request / Purchase Orders an they have on &quot;Substitutions on&quot; as &quot;Task delegation substitution&quot;they have own tasks and &quot;extra tasks from others&quot; .... and opening in task view resets first one ... Other Deps did not see that as issue ... so I have request.Reference:https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5496and this user voice:https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/3772/15and this: https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/2975]]></description>
  3048.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Paweł Tołoczko)]]></author>
  3049.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5498#msg-5498</guid>
  3050.                <pubDate>Fri, 02 Aug 2024 11:47:49 +0200</pubDate>
  3051.                            </item>
  3052.                    <item>
  3053.                
  3054.                <title><![CDATA[Security bulettin as excel/csv]]></title>
  3055.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5341#msg-5465</link>
  3056.                <description><![CDATA[Hi,Seems like CSV is already there: https://community.webcon.com/others/security/7, but no response here have been posted?I would also love to opt for some security mailing list - it&#039;s better to get information, not to search for it in that situation :)]]></description>
  3057.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Maksymilian Stachowiak)]]></author>
  3058.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5341#msg-5465</guid>
  3059.                <pubDate>Wed, 31 Jul 2024 13:08:46 +0200</pubDate>
  3060.                            </item>
  3061.                    <item>
  3062.                
  3063.                <title><![CDATA[Grouping processes in the application]]></title>
  3064.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5427#msg-5427</link>
  3065.                <description><![CDATA[Hello everyone,Increasingly, when creating large applications containing many processes, dictionaries or document templates, the ability to group processes in Designer Studio would be useful. You can then group processes as you wish, making it much easier to navigate through large applications.Would it be possible to add such grouping to Designer Studio?Greetings to all ;)]]></description>
  3066.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Krzysztof Gaszczyk)]]></author>
  3067.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5427#msg-5427</guid>
  3068.                <pubDate>Thu, 25 Jul 2024 09:50:38 +0200</pubDate>
  3069.                            </item>
  3070.                    <item>
  3071.                
  3072.                <title><![CDATA[ToDo List]]></title>
  3073.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5331#msg-5423</link>
  3074.                <description><![CDATA[If you could to do list use in process .. thenYou can do process to assign task to someone ...then why not.If is more than 1/2 person responsible for dev or testing then I see potential-- edit---https://developer.webcon.com/2024/resources/db/#todoitemsSo .. you can do process to assign tasks using ToDo table ...using native webcon template https://community.webcon.com/online-store/app/task/23just add few attributes  ...]]></description>
  3075.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Paweł Tołoczko)]]></author>
  3076.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5331#msg-5423</guid>
  3077.                <pubDate>Wed, 24 Jul 2024 11:05:11 +0200</pubDate>
  3078.                            </item>
  3079.                    <item>
  3080.                
  3081.                <title><![CDATA[LSP - Autocompletion in SQL business rules.]]></title>
  3082.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5405#msg-5405</link>
  3083.                <description><![CDATA[Hi everyone,This might be a big one, but on one of latest webinars I&#039;ve heard that there is open &#039;Designer Studio&#039; project at Webcon, so I&#039;ll give it a shot - if not now, then I&#039;m not sure if there will be a better time ;)I think most of us have used SQL Server Management Studio or Azure Data Studio to test some queries, and maybe a VSCode / Notepad++ for some powershell - all of those support autocompletion (which in most cases of recent software is supported by language server protocol).Could we get a built in autocompletion for custom business rules inside Designer Studio?I&#039;m leaving 2 examples of how autocompletion works in Azure Data Studio, and leaving one additional concept what kind of autocompletions i would like to see.Creating it as LSP would also allow using it natively in Designer Studio, and as extensions to text editors.]]></description>
  3084.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Maksymilian Stachowiak)]]></author>
  3085.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5405#msg-5405</guid>
  3086.                <pubDate>Mon, 22 Jul 2024 11:14:31 +0200</pubDate>
  3087.                            </item>
  3088.                    <item>
  3089.                
  3090.                <title><![CDATA[ToDo List]]></title>
  3091.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5331#msg-5404</link>
  3092.                <description><![CDATA[Hi,I&#039;m not really sure if webcon is good place to delegate tasks from project perspective (you&#039;ve mentioned project tracking). It would require project managers to have access to designer desk / designer studio.I would rather opt for some integration with Jira/Github/Gitlab/Teams tasks/issues -&gt; creating a task on webcon side, automatically creates one in integrated platform.This would help with keeping the tasks in one place, rather than having many of them.I&#039;m interested to hear other voices though :)]]></description>
  3093.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Maksymilian Stachowiak)]]></author>
  3094.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5331#msg-5404</guid>
  3095.                <pubDate>Mon, 22 Jul 2024 10:46:46 +0200</pubDate>
  3096.                            </item>
  3097.                    <item>
  3098.                
  3099.                <title><![CDATA[Diagnostic sessions: Custom title]]></title>
  3100.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5370#msg-5389</link>
  3101.                <description><![CDATA[This is how it may look like after a few tests. If you are working together with a customer or colleague it&#039;s getting hard to find the relevant sessions for each case.]]></description>
  3102.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Daniel Krüger Cosmo Consult)]]></author>
  3103.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5370#msg-5389</guid>
  3104.                <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jul 2024 16:55:56 +0200</pubDate>
  3105.                            </item>
  3106.                    <item>
  3107.                
  3108.                <title><![CDATA[Widgets field: Wishlist for additional capabilities]]></title>
  3109.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5303#msg-5378</link>
  3110.                <description><![CDATA[Hi,something similar may be available in 2024 R2 if I understood it correctly in the webinar.I was referring to the new widgets:https://community.webcon.com/posts/post/widgets/465/3I would have liked if the widgets could accept pure text like in the attachment (1).Clicking on it could execute a form rule, for example to show a tab, navigate somewhere else or it could be used as a big button. :)Best regards,Daniel]]></description>
  3111.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Daniel Krüger Cosmo Consult)]]></author>
  3112.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5303#msg-5378</guid>
  3113.                <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jul 2024 19:35:33 +0200</pubDate>
  3114.                            </item>
  3115.                    <item>
  3116.                
  3117.                <title><![CDATA[Attachments menu: Add support for hyperlink]]></title>
  3118.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5377#msg-5377</link>
  3119.                <description><![CDATA[Hi,it would really be great to add support for the hyperlink action on the attachment menu.The only additional thing which would be required is the id of the current attachment.The hyperlink action supports executing JavaScript and one use case would be to trigger the print dialog without opening the preview.While this is one there may be other use cases which is the reason why I don&#039;t request a &quot;print action&quot;.Best regards,Daniel]]></description>
  3120.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Daniel Krüger Cosmo Consult)]]></author>
  3121.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5377#msg-5377</guid>
  3122.                <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jul 2024 19:30:18 +0200</pubDate>
  3123.                            </item>
  3124.                    <item>
  3125.                
  3126.                <title><![CDATA[BPS Groups inside BPS Grops]]></title>
  3127.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4366#msg-5372</link>
  3128.                <description><![CDATA[There is also quite another side. If you can&#039;t manage permissions comprehensively from one place, you have to split the management between multiple systems (BPS, AD, etc.), usually having separate admins. Anyway - I think such functionality would be great and maybe something could be done about it after all :)]]></description>
  3129.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (MikeS)]]></author>
  3130.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4366#msg-5372</guid>
  3131.                <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jul 2024 17:39:59 +0200</pubDate>
  3132.                            </item>
  3133.                    <item>
  3134.                
  3135.                <title><![CDATA[Diagnostic sessions: Custom title]]></title>
  3136.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5370#msg-5370</link>
  3137.                <description><![CDATA[Hi, it would really be great to add a custom title or even a description to a new diagnostic session or in the overview.This would make it easier to identify the session.It would nice if the user could provide the details but it shouldn&#039;t be in the &quot;end and save session&quot; dialog. It happened to me a few times, that the a JS error occurred and the dialog wasn&#039;t displayed.Best regards,Daniel]]></description>
  3138.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Daniel Krüger Cosmo Consult)]]></author>
  3139.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5370#msg-5370</guid>
  3140.                <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jul 2024 15:28:05 +0200</pubDate>
  3141.                            </item>
  3142.                    <item>
  3143.                
  3144.                <title><![CDATA[SQL Server compatibility level]]></title>
  3145.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/3401#msg-5366</link>
  3146.                <description><![CDATA[I solved tthis problem with create another database with my settings and i made connection between my database and BPS_Content.]]></description>
  3147.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Michał Ciesiołkiewicz)]]></author>
  3148.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/3401#msg-5366</guid>
  3149.                <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jul 2024 14:11:19 +0200</pubDate>
  3150.                            </item>
  3151.                    <item>
  3152.                
  3153.                <title><![CDATA[Performance: Data row configuration Only calculate when viewed]]></title>
  3154.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5360#msg-5360</link>
  3155.                <description><![CDATA[Hi,I&#039;m currently reducing the execution time of a long path transition in version 2023.1.2.44. In this context I noticed that saving the instance executes &quot;recalculate rows&quot;.In our case this causes another execution of data rows which are only used for displaying information. They are not used in any other combination, even the usage tab is empty.It would be great, if we could have a checkbox or similar for a data row whether the recalculation can be skipped.While each execution takes only 30-50 ms this sums up to almost 2 seconds in total.Ok, this is also due to the fact that the dev system is undersized but this doesn&#039;t change the fact, that there is room for improvement. :)Best regards,Daniel]]></description>
  3156.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Daniel Krüger Cosmo Consult)]]></author>
  3157.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5360#msg-5360</guid>
  3158.                <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jul 2024 08:49:44 +0200</pubDate>
  3159.                            </item>
  3160.                    <item>
  3161.                
  3162.                <title><![CDATA[Company selection]]></title>
  3163.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5307#msg-5357</link>
  3164.                <description><![CDATA[It&#039;s a great idea. I&#039;m all for itIf there are more than 10-20 companies, scrolling through and finding the right one is very irritating (in addition, EVERY tab is titled &quot;Business entity: xxx&quot; which also takes up space)]]></description>
  3165.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Jacek Wojnar)]]></author>
  3166.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5307#msg-5357</guid>
  3167.                <pubDate>Tue, 16 Jul 2024 13:23:00 +0200</pubDate>
  3168.                            </item>
  3169.                    <item>
  3170.                
  3171.                <title><![CDATA[Opening usages actions from usages window]]></title>
  3172.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/1151#msg-5355</link>
  3173.                <description><![CDATA[Yes, it&#039;s so annoying when you look on usages and have to manually search for each business rule, etc.This will surely improve life quality of developers. I hope Webcon can add this soon.Big +1]]></description>
  3174.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Rafał Hrabia)]]></author>
  3175.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/1151#msg-5355</guid>
  3176.                <pubDate>Tue, 16 Jul 2024 10:20:10 +0200</pubDate>
  3177.                            </item>
  3178.                    <item>
  3179.                
  3180.                <title><![CDATA[Widgets field: Wishlist for additional capabilities]]></title>
  3181.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5303#msg-5354</link>
  3182.                <description><![CDATA[I agree, I don&#039;t use it yeat (I&#039;m in Webcon 2022 ...) , but I see limitation.I would like to have something like that as native:[code=&quot;https://devrecipes.net/step-progres-bar-with-pure-css/&quot;]Dynamic Stepper  .stepper-wrapper {    margin-top: auto;    display: flex;    justify-content: space-between;    margin-bottom: 20px;  }  .stepper-item {    position: relative;    display: flex;    flex-direction: column;    align-items: center;    flex: 1;  }  .stepper-item::before {    position: absolute;    content: &quot;&quot;;    border-bottom: 2px solid #ccc;    width: 100%;    top: 20px;    left: -50%;    z-index: 2;  }  .stepper-item::after {    position: absolute;    content: &quot;&quot;;    border-bottom: 2px solid #ccc;    width: 100%;    top: 20px;    left: 50%;    z-index: 2;  }  .stepper-item .step-counter {    position: relative;    z-index: 5;    display: flex;    justify-content: center;    align-items: center;    width: 40px;    height: 40px;    border-radius: 50%;    background: white; /* Zmienione wypenienie na biae */    margin-bottom: 6px;    border: 2px solid #ccc; /* Dodana szara obwdka */  }  .stepper-item.active .step-counter {    border: 2px solid black; /* Czarna pogrubiona obwdka wok aktywnego kroku */  }  .stepper-item.completed .step-counter {    background-color: #4bb543;    border: 2px solid #4bb543; /* Dopasowanie obwdki do koloru wypenienia dla ukoczonego kroku */  }  .stepper-item.completed::after {    position: absolute;    content: &quot;&quot;;    border-bottom: 2px solid #4bb543;    width: 100%;    top: 20px;    left: 50%;    z-index: 3;  }  .stepper-item:first-child::before {    content: none;  }  .stepper-item:last-child::after {    content: none;  }  .stepper-item.active .step-name {    font-weight: bold; /* Pogrubienie tekstu w aktywnym kroku */  }          D0            D1            D2            D3            D4            D5            D6            D7            D8            Zakoczona    // Tutaj ustawiamy warto zmiennej krok  var krok = #{3123}#; // przykad, mona j dynamicznie ustawia  var stepperItems = document.querySelectorAll(&#039;.stepper-item&#039;);  stepperItems.forEach((item, index) =&gt; {    var stepCounter = item.querySelector(&#039;.step-counter&#039;);    if (index &lt; krok - 1) {      item.classList.add(&#039;completed&#039;);      stepCounter.textContent = &#039;&#039;; // Unicode dla ptaszka    } else if (index === krok - 1) {      item.classList.add(&#039;active&#039;);    }  });[/code]if you wish to test: &gt;&gt;&gt; https://portal.webconbps.com/db/1/app/452/element/6828/form]]></description>
  3183.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Paweł Tołoczko)]]></author>
  3184.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5303#msg-5354</guid>
  3185.                <pubDate>Mon, 15 Jul 2024 18:43:23 +0200</pubDate>
  3186.                            </item>
  3187.                    <item>
  3188.                
  3189.                <title><![CDATA[PROPOSAL: Email Templates - Editability of Go to Element and Go to Application]]></title>
  3190.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5205#msg-5343</link>
  3191.                <description><![CDATA[Awesome, thanks! I&#039;m linking the article here for future reference: https://community.webcon.com/posts/post/email-templates-editability-of-go-to-element-and-go-to-application/474/3]]></description>
  3192.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Michal Rykiert)]]></author>
  3193.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5205#msg-5343</guid>
  3194.                <pubDate>Mon, 15 Jul 2024 10:06:04 +0200</pubDate>
  3195.                            </item>
  3196.                    <item>
  3197.                
  3198.                <title><![CDATA[Security bulettin as excel/csv]]></title>
  3199.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5341#msg-5341</link>
  3200.                <description><![CDATA[Hi,at least for partners it would be great to have the security bulletin not only as PDF but as csv or excel file so that the information can automatically be processes.Best regards,Daniel]]></description>
  3201.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Daniel Krüger Cosmo Consult)]]></author>
  3202.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5341#msg-5341</guid>
  3203.                <pubDate>Mon, 15 Jul 2024 09:37:36 +0200</pubDate>
  3204.                            </item>
  3205.                    <item>
  3206.                
  3207.                <title><![CDATA[ToDo List]]></title>
  3208.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5331#msg-5331</link>
  3209.                <description><![CDATA[Dear Webcon Team,The new To-Do list feature is excellent. However, adding the ability to assign/delegate tasks would significantly enhance team collaboration, efficiency, and accountability. This feature would allow clear assignment of responsibilities, ensuring better workload distribution and improved project tracking.Best regards,Konrad]]></description>
  3210.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (AlidEk)]]></author>
  3211.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5331#msg-5331</guid>
  3212.                <pubDate>Sat, 13 Jul 2024 11:48:58 +0200</pubDate>
  3213.                            </item>
  3214.                    <item>
  3215.                
  3216.                <title><![CDATA[PROPOSAL: Email Templates - Editability of Go to Element and Go to Application]]></title>
  3217.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5205#msg-5330</link>
  3218.                <description><![CDATA[Hi Michal,In German, we would say &quot;Da stand ich auf dem Schlauch,&quot; which translates directly to &quot;I was standing on the hose&quot; and means &quot;I was stumped.&quot;I created a custom link with my button image without any issues. ;-)If no one else gets to it first, I will write a short article for the knowledge base.Have a great weekend!Best regards,Bjoern]]></description>
  3219.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Bjoern Poller)]]></author>
  3220.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5205#msg-5330</guid>
  3221.                <pubDate>Fri, 12 Jul 2024 19:34:26 +0200</pubDate>
  3222.                            </item>
  3223.                    <item>
  3224.                
  3225.                <title><![CDATA[Default dashboards in the context of user roles]]></title>
  3226.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5310#msg-5310</link>
  3227.                <description><![CDATA[I propose a change in the configuration of the default dashboards so that it is possible to define different main dashboards for different user groups. E.g. Invoices. A different approach to invoices is expected by the person registering, another by the person describing, another by the accountant, another by the payment team, etc.]]></description>
  3228.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (MikeS)]]></author>
  3229.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5310#msg-5310</guid>
  3230.                <pubDate>Thu, 11 Jul 2024 11:15:01 +0200</pubDate>
  3231.                            </item>
  3232.                    <item>
  3233.                
  3234.                <title><![CDATA[Company selection]]></title>
  3235.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5307#msg-5307</link>
  3236.                <description><![CDATA[Hi all. When searching/changing permissions in Webcon, there are tabs to choose from. If there are more than can fit in the window width, scrolling through them is dramatically slow.I would suggest changing this to a drop-down list. With a search option it would be great.[I added the same topic six months ago, but I&#039;m doing it again because of the lack of response to the previous one].]]></description>
  3237.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (MikeS)]]></author>
  3238.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5307#msg-5307</guid>
  3239.                <pubDate>Thu, 11 Jul 2024 10:33:46 +0200</pubDate>
  3240.                            </item>
  3241.                    <item>
  3242.                
  3243.                <title><![CDATA[Widgets field: Wishlist for additional capabilities]]></title>
  3244.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5303#msg-5303</link>
  3245.                <description><![CDATA[Hi,as always, when there&#039;s a new functionality, there will be immediately requests for a second improved version. :)- Additional widget type &#039;Text&#039;, which will output any text and not only numbers. For example to display information like &quot;open/closed&quot; sub workflows: 2/4.- A form rule can be executed what should happen when the user clicks on it. We could display a tab for example or execute a hyperlink or whatever.- A form rule to trigger the refresh of the widget. Can be useful if a subworkflow was started/completed in a modal.Best regards,Daniel]]></description>
  3246.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Daniel Krüger Cosmo Consult)]]></author>
  3247.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5303#msg-5303</guid>
  3248.                <pubDate>Thu, 11 Jul 2024 07:14:33 +0200</pubDate>
  3249.                            </item>
  3250.                    <item>
  3251.                
  3252.                <title><![CDATA[AAD: People with/out  external user selection]]></title>
  3253.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/3488#msg-5302</link>
  3254.                <description><![CDATA[This can be closed as this can be solved using the new filter option for the &quot;People and groups&quot; data sources option.]]></description>
  3255.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Daniel Krüger Cosmo Consult)]]></author>
  3256.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/3488#msg-5302</guid>
  3257.                <pubDate>Thu, 11 Jul 2024 07:01:30 +0200</pubDate>
  3258.                            </item>
  3259.                    <item>
  3260.                
  3261.                <title><![CDATA[Dark Mode and Code Editor]]></title>
  3262.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5291#msg-5291</link>
  3263.                <description><![CDATA[Good morning, Designer Studio is missing Dark Mode - many if not 99% of programmers are just working on dark colors, thus saving their eyes and improving the comfort of their work. The second topic is the code editor. Currently, in Designer Studio, the place where we edit code that is, for example, &quot;sql command&quot; is probably a regular notepad without support for, for example, tab. It would be useful to have such a small VS Code in the places where we edit code. Reports of this type have already appeared but I am refreshing the thread.]]></description>
  3264.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Wojciech Włodarczyk)]]></author>
  3265.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5291#msg-5291</guid>
  3266.                <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jul 2024 11:47:56 +0200</pubDate>
  3267.                            </item>
  3268.                    <item>
  3269.                
  3270.                <title><![CDATA[Reports - narrowing filter by phrase with the ability to save a private view for users]]></title>
  3271.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5118#msg-5278</link>
  3272.                <description><![CDATA[Hi Krystian,some UX improvements will be introduced alongside the new UI (it should debut in R2 2024). While they don&#039;t directly respond to your suggestion, they might help with solving the case from the business perspective. So for the moment, I&#039;ll mark this topic as &quot;not now&quot;, however I&#039;ll be curious about your feedback about the reports once the new UI is released.]]></description>
  3273.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Michal Rykiert)]]></author>
  3274.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5118#msg-5278</guid>
  3275.                <pubDate>Mon, 08 Jul 2024 15:45:57 +0200</pubDate>
  3276.                            </item>
  3277.                    <item>
  3278.                
  3279.                <title><![CDATA[Create E-Mail Template from Configurable Mail]]></title>
  3280.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5050#msg-5277</link>
  3281.                <description><![CDATA[Let&#039;s see how many people need that, please vote!]]></description>
  3282.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Michal Rykiert)]]></author>
  3283.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5050#msg-5277</guid>
  3284.                <pubDate>Mon, 08 Jul 2024 15:39:48 +0200</pubDate>
  3285.                            </item>
  3286.                    <item>
  3287.                
  3288.                <title><![CDATA[SDK: Option to overwrite/extend notification actions]]></title>
  3289.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5053#msg-5276</link>
  3290.                <description><![CDATA[Hi Daniel, it&#039;s an interesting suggestion, however due to other priority features already scheduled we don&#039;t plan on making changes as suggested in the nearest future. We might re-visit it later.]]></description>
  3291.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Michal Rykiert)]]></author>
  3292.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5053#msg-5276</guid>
  3293.                <pubDate>Mon, 08 Jul 2024 15:39:22 +0200</pubDate>
  3294.                            </item>
  3295.                    <item>
  3296.                
  3297.                <title><![CDATA[Concat - Vertical Layout]]></title>
  3298.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5057#msg-5275</link>
  3299.                <description><![CDATA[Deal! There&#039;s a chance it will appear in R2 2024, but let&#039;s see :).]]></description>
  3300.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Michal Rykiert)]]></author>
  3301.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5057#msg-5275</guid>
  3302.                <pubDate>Mon, 08 Jul 2024 15:37:08 +0200</pubDate>
  3303.                            </item>
  3304.                    <item>
  3305.                
  3306.                <title><![CDATA[Path - add Tab used / connect automations with path]]></title>
  3307.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5089#msg-5274</link>
  3308.                <description><![CDATA[Hi Pawe, our devs will review it and decide on what to do next.]]></description>
  3309.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Michal Rykiert)]]></author>
  3310.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5089#msg-5274</guid>
  3311.                <pubDate>Mon, 08 Jul 2024 15:35:25 +0200</pubDate>
  3312.                            </item>
  3313.                    <item>
  3314.                
  3315.                <title><![CDATA[I would like to: In Group put Tabs and then in each Tab put Groups]]></title>
  3316.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5049#msg-5273</link>
  3317.                <description><![CDATA[Hi Pawel, at the moment it&#039;s not feasible, however the Designer Studio has some significant changes planned already.]]></description>
  3318.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Michal Rykiert)]]></author>
  3319.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5049#msg-5273</guid>
  3320.                <pubDate>Mon, 08 Jul 2024 15:34:46 +0200</pubDate>
  3321.                            </item>
  3322.                    <item>
  3323.                
  3324.                <title><![CDATA[Private view with search parameters]]></title>
  3325.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5125#msg-5272</link>
  3326.                <description><![CDATA[Hi Karol, at the moment we&#039;re not planning on introducing changes in this area. We&#039;ll re-visit your suggestion in further interations.]]></description>
  3327.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Michal Rykiert)]]></author>
  3328.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5125#msg-5272</guid>
  3329.                <pubDate>Mon, 08 Jul 2024 15:32:55 +0200</pubDate>
  3330.                            </item>
  3331.                    <item>
  3332.                
  3333.                <title><![CDATA[Options for admin available immediately]]></title>
  3334.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5127#msg-5271</link>
  3335.                <description><![CDATA[While we don&#039;t negate the positive impact of the suggestion, however realistically looking at this point there&#039;s many more cases with higher priority.]]></description>
  3336.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Michal Rykiert)]]></author>
  3337.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5127#msg-5271</guid>
  3338.                <pubDate>Mon, 08 Jul 2024 15:02:36 +0200</pubDate>
  3339.                            </item>
  3340.                    <item>
  3341.                
  3342.                <title><![CDATA[Gantt chart as native report type]]></title>
  3343.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5141#msg-5270</link>
  3344.                <description><![CDATA[True. So far other features took priority. Let&#039;s see how many votes this gets, it will help us with the priority management.]]></description>
  3345.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Michal Rykiert)]]></author>
  3346.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5141#msg-5270</guid>
  3347.                <pubDate>Mon, 08 Jul 2024 15:00:42 +0200</pubDate>
  3348.                            </item>
  3349.                    <item>
  3350.                
  3351.                <title><![CDATA[A small change in the window in Designer Studio for adding/edit user group]]></title>
  3352.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5154#msg-5269</link>
  3353.                <description><![CDATA[It certainly makes sense! We&#039;ll review it and see when to implement it.]]></description>
  3354.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Michal Rykiert)]]></author>
  3355.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5154#msg-5269</guid>
  3356.                <pubDate>Mon, 08 Jul 2024 14:58:31 +0200</pubDate>
  3357.                            </item>
  3358.                    <item>
  3359.                
  3360.                <title><![CDATA[sql editor - monospace font and not to add newlines]]></title>
  3361.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5159#msg-5268</link>
  3362.                <description><![CDATA[Thanks all for your contributions. As you can see one case is already in the backlog. The other will be evaluated. There&#039;s a high chance they&#039;ll both find their way into the product.]]></description>
  3363.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Michal Rykiert)]]></author>
  3364.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5159#msg-5268</guid>
  3365.                <pubDate>Mon, 08 Jul 2024 14:57:27 +0200</pubDate>
  3366.                            </item>
  3367.                    <item>
  3368.                
  3369.                <title><![CDATA[PROPOSAL: Item List Excel Import - Increase Maximum Number of Records to 2001/2501]]></title>
  3370.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5201#msg-5267</link>
  3371.                <description><![CDATA[Hi Bjoern, we&#039;ll evaluate such case performance-wise and assess the feasibility of making changes to the platform.]]></description>
  3372.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Michal Rykiert)]]></author>
  3373.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5201#msg-5267</guid>
  3374.                <pubDate>Mon, 08 Jul 2024 14:55:23 +0200</pubDate>
  3375.                            </item>
  3376.                    <item>
  3377.                
  3378.                <title><![CDATA[PROPOSAL: Email Templates - Editability of Go to Element and Go to Application]]></title>
  3379.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5205#msg-5266</link>
  3380.                <description><![CDATA[Hi Bjoern, in such case you should be able to customize the e-mail notification template by removing the standard buttons (links) and replacing them with your custom ones. I don&#039;t have a ready-to-use instruction for you at the moment, but this shouldn&#039;t be too tricky. I&#039;ll also pass it as a suggestion for a new article to the knowledge base.]]></description>
  3381.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Michal Rykiert)]]></author>
  3382.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5205#msg-5266</guid>
  3383.                <pubDate>Mon, 08 Jul 2024 14:53:47 +0200</pubDate>
  3384.                            </item>
  3385.                    <item>
  3386.                
  3387.                <title><![CDATA[Adding users to groups shouldn&#039;t trigger synchronizing the user properties from Azure AD]]></title>
  3388.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5206#msg-5265</link>
  3389.                <description><![CDATA[Hi Daniel, thanks for the suggestion and sharing of all of your findings related to the case. We&#039;ve already forwarded them to our devs for analysis.]]></description>
  3390.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Michal Rykiert)]]></author>
  3391.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5206#msg-5265</guid>
  3392.                <pubDate>Mon, 08 Jul 2024 14:48:36 +0200</pubDate>
  3393.                            </item>
  3394.                    <item>
  3395.                
  3396.                <title><![CDATA[Migration of User Synchronization to the Config Database]]></title>
  3397.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5219#msg-5264</link>
  3398.                <description><![CDATA[Hi Krystian, at this point we&#039;re not planning any changes in to the area of the user sync and the storage of related data.]]></description>
  3399.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Michal Rykiert)]]></author>
  3400.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5219#msg-5264</guid>
  3401.                <pubDate>Mon, 08 Jul 2024 14:41:33 +0200</pubDate>
  3402.                            </item>
  3403.                    <item>
  3404.                
  3405.                <title><![CDATA[Item list row: Add source information to popup of action context menu]]></title>
  3406.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5257#msg-5257</link>
  3407.                <description><![CDATA[Hi,if the browser window is small enough, the actions of the item list are collapsed to a context menu.It would be great if this popup would contain information in the DOM about the about the source.For example by adding a data-key attribute to the top element with the value item list and row.]]></description>
  3408.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Daniel Krüger Cosmo Consult)]]></author>
  3409.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5257#msg-5257</guid>
  3410.                <pubDate>Sun, 07 Jul 2024 22:10:47 +0200</pubDate>
  3411.                            </item>
  3412.                    <item>
  3413.                
  3414.                <title><![CDATA[ITEM LIST ACTION buttons position in front column]]></title>
  3415.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/1481#msg-5256</link>
  3416.                <description><![CDATA[While searching for another post I stumbled upon this. Even so I would still prefer this solution, there has been some changes in the later versions.1) In a small window a context menu is shown 2) In a larger window but with a long item list the actions are now floating.]]></description>
  3417.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Daniel Krüger Cosmo Consult)]]></author>
  3418.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/1481#msg-5256</guid>
  3419.                <pubDate>Sun, 07 Jul 2024 20:18:14 +0200</pubDate>
  3420.                            </item>
  3421.                    <item>
  3422.                
  3423.                <title><![CDATA[Environment setting to disable: Timeout actions error: checkout exception occurred]]></title>
  3424.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5248#msg-5248</link>
  3425.                <description><![CDATA[Hi,I think everyone of use has run into this error more often in dev/test than anyone wants to admit.MessageTIM_ID: 15 - WEBCON BPS Timeout actions error: checkout exception occurred.Instance ID (WFD_ID): 5907WEBCON BPS Timeout ID (TIM_ID): 15Could you we gain a global setting, with which we can disable this check / allow the timeout to undo the checkout?I completely understand the reason and I would never disable this check in production but on the dev environment I would enable it without a second thought. :)Best regads,Daniel]]></description>
  3426.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Daniel Krüger Cosmo Consult)]]></author>
  3427.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5248#msg-5248</guid>
  3428.                <pubDate>Fri, 05 Jul 2024 16:06:35 +0200</pubDate>
  3429.                            </item>
  3430.                    <item>
  3431.                
  3432.                <title><![CDATA[Migration of User Synchronization to the Config Database]]></title>
  3433.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5219#msg-5228</link>
  3434.                <description><![CDATA[Hi Krystian,I&#039;m not sure that I understand what you mean with &quot;single table&quot;.1. Should the data of the existing tables be merged into a single table but there should be one table in each database.?2. Should the five tables be left as they are but there shouldn&#039;t be duplicates in the other databases?3. Something else?Merging all tables won&#039;t be possible, as they serve different purposes. For example the GroupRelations contains the id&#039;s contains the ids of the groups  and their users. This can not be merged to a single row.I&#039;m quite sure that WEBCON has thought about of any option whether the duplicate tables could be removed, synchronizing is always a pain and you won&#039;t do it, if there&#039;s a way around it. One problem for example is, that limited bps_user account can not access data outside the current database. Even if there would be a view mapped to the config database in the content database, this won&#039;t work.Best regards,Daniel]]></description>
  3435.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Daniel Krüger Cosmo Consult)]]></author>
  3436.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5219#msg-5228</guid>
  3437.                <pubDate>Wed, 03 Jul 2024 22:36:00 +0200</pubDate>
  3438.                            </item>
  3439.                    <item>
  3440.                
  3441.                <title><![CDATA[SUGGESTION: NEW LAYOUT OPTION FOR DASHBOARD [50%-25%-25%]]]></title>
  3442.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5226#msg-5226</link>
  3443.                <description><![CDATA[Just a reminder ;-) : https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/1028?messageid=1028Hello there,with working much more with compact start buttons, i am optimizing our older dashboard layouts.We have a few applications, which have many start buttons.So i was wondering, if, maybe, in further coming WEBCON versions there could be the possibility toadd 2 more &quot;section layouts&quot; like i posted in the picture. Mostly the usefull one would be: half side left,and two small columns in the right half.With this layout options designing dashboards and grouping buttons would work much better.Thanks,BjoernP.S.: Maybe i forgot the third version 25% - 50% - 25%, if someone want to place a central image.]]></description>
  3444.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Bjoern Poller)]]></author>
  3445.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5226#msg-5226</guid>
  3446.                <pubDate>Wed, 03 Jul 2024 16:22:06 +0200</pubDate>
  3447.                            </item>
  3448.                    <item>
  3449.                
  3450.                <title><![CDATA[sql editor - monospace font and not to add newlines]]></title>
  3451.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5159#msg-5220</link>
  3452.                <description><![CDATA[Hi Bartek,thanks! It still workaround but nice to know that :-)]]></description>
  3453.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Jacek Wojnar)]]></author>
  3454.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5159#msg-5220</guid>
  3455.                <pubDate>Wed, 03 Jul 2024 12:18:16 +0200</pubDate>
  3456.                            </item>
  3457.                    <item>
  3458.                
  3459.                <title><![CDATA[Migration of User Synchronization to the Config Database]]></title>
  3460.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5219#msg-5219</link>
  3461.                <description><![CDATA[Currently, if a company has several content databases, for example 5, and users need to be synchronized across each database, the data is stored in 5 tables * 5 databases, resulting in the same data being present in 25 tables.CacheOrganizationStructureCacheOrganizationStructureExtendedTokensCacheOrganizationStructureGroupRelationsCacheOrganizationStructurePicturesCacheOrganizationStructureSubordinatesWouldn&#039;t migrating to a single table from which data could be drawn be more convenient?]]></description>
  3462.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Krystian Golik)]]></author>
  3463.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5219#msg-5219</guid>
  3464.                <pubDate>Wed, 03 Jul 2024 12:11:46 +0200</pubDate>
  3465.                            </item>
  3466.                    <item>
  3467.                
  3468.                <title><![CDATA[sql editor - monospace font and not to add newlines]]></title>
  3469.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5159#msg-5218</link>
  3470.                <description><![CDATA[Hi Jack,ad 2. In a SSQL similar function exists https://dba.stackexchange.com/questions/124915/how-to-remove-line-breaks-in-ssms]]></description>
  3471.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Bartek)]]></author>
  3472.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5159#msg-5218</guid>
  3473.                <pubDate>Wed, 03 Jul 2024 12:06:38 +0200</pubDate>
  3474.                            </item>
  3475.                    <item>
  3476.                
  3477.                <title><![CDATA[Adding users to groups shouldn&#039;t trigger synchronizing the user properties from Azure AD]]></title>
  3478.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5206#msg-5211</link>
  3479.                <description><![CDATA[Now it is even more interesting.It seems, that the transaction was still running and that&#039;s the reason why I didn&#039;t see the workflow instances. Neither in the Portal nor in SQL Server Management studio. I didn&#039;t think of making a dirty read.I checked this morning and now they show up. It just took about 7 hours to complete everything.I have now idea how this may have been implemented but they have me respect that this worked out fine. :)]]></description>
  3480.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Daniel Krüger Cosmo Consult)]]></author>
  3481.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5206#msg-5211</guid>
  3482.                <pubDate>Wed, 03 Jul 2024 06:37:18 +0200</pubDate>
  3483.                            </item>
  3484.                    <item>
  3485.                
  3486.                <title><![CDATA[Adding users to groups shouldn&#039;t trigger synchronizing the user properties from Azure AD]]></title>
  3487.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5206#msg-5209</link>
  3488.                <description><![CDATA[Digging deeper:The parent workflow was executed at 15:29 UTC (17:29) (1) I joined the LOG_WFDID column with the WFElements table. While the LOG_WFDID column has a value the WFD_ID column is null and new log entries are created for &quot;new workflow&quot; at this moment. (2)This is really strange. :)]]></description>
  3489.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Daniel Krüger Cosmo Consult)]]></author>
  3490.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5206#msg-5209</guid>
  3491.                <pubDate>Tue, 02 Jul 2024 18:08:15 +0200</pubDate>
  3492.                            </item>
  3493.                    <item>
  3494.                
  3495.                <title><![CDATA[Adding users to groups shouldn&#039;t trigger synchronizing the user properties from Azure AD]]></title>
  3496.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5206#msg-5208</link>
  3497.                <description><![CDATA[Something interestingly happened.I wanted to create a  few hundred BPS groups to test something unrelated to this topic. I already had a process for creating the groups and assigning the users. I wanted to utilize it by creating another process with an item list, populate this via excel, and start the first for each row. So far so easy I had in mind. I got distracted and forgot to add a loop to prevent that all item list rows are processed at ones.The action for creating the sub workflows was on the path when a new workflow instance is created.Obviously the execution failed due to the timeout issue, but while writing this post more and more BPS groups are popping up in Portal.So, while the workflow instance used for importing the data wasn&#039;t saved, and the subworkflows haven&#039;t been created the BPS groups are being created.The archive -/db/6/app/26/explore/all  - does not contain any new workflows.]]></description>
  3498.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Daniel Krüger Cosmo Consult)]]></author>
  3499.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5206#msg-5208</guid>
  3500.                <pubDate>Tue, 02 Jul 2024 17:54:11 +0200</pubDate>
  3501.                            </item>
  3502.                    <item>
  3503.                
  3504.                <title><![CDATA[Adding users to groups shouldn&#039;t trigger synchronizing the user properties from Azure AD]]></title>
  3505.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5206#msg-5206</link>
  3506.                <description><![CDATA[Hi.adding users to groups causes an update of the user properties which downloads objects from Azure AD.Depending on the environment it can take quite a long time.  - (7/2/2024 2:33:46 PM) Step started: Download selected objects from Azure AD if required  - (7/2/2024 2:35:44 PM) Step completed: Download selected objects from Azure AD if required (duration: 118687 ms)While this is not a problem if the user is added via the Portal, executing the &quot;Add user action&quot; in synchronous mode leads to a timeout error in the browser.https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5203I don&#039;t see any reason, why adding the user to a BPS group should trigger an update from Azure AD. Could this part of the logic be removed?Best regards,Daniel]]></description>
  3507.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Daniel Krüger Cosmo Consult)]]></author>
  3508.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5206#msg-5206</guid>
  3509.                <pubDate>Tue, 02 Jul 2024 17:08:55 +0200</pubDate>
  3510.                            </item>
  3511.                    <item>
  3512.                
  3513.                <title><![CDATA[PROPOSAL: Email Templates - Editability of Go to Element and Go to Application]]></title>
  3514.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5205#msg-5205</link>
  3515.                <description><![CDATA[Hello everyone,we use a lot of custom email templates. One recurring issue is the lack of options for design and name changesfor &quot;Go to Element&quot; and &quot;Go to Application&quot;. Additionally, emails for users who rarely interact with WEBCON often find the &quot;Go to Element&quot; button confusing. It would be desirable for us if the names were customizable and the fields could respond to HTML design instructions. Ideally, it would also be great if images could be used as buttons for that fields.If I have missed any existing options for this, I would appreciate any tips.Thank you in advance,Bjoern Poller]]></description>
  3516.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Bjoern Poller)]]></author>
  3517.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5205#msg-5205</guid>
  3518.                <pubDate>Tue, 02 Jul 2024 17:01:44 +0200</pubDate>
  3519.                            </item>
  3520.                    <item>
  3521.                
  3522.                <title><![CDATA[DOCUMENT TEMPLATE WITH QR CODE]]></title>
  3523.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4684#msg-5202</link>
  3524.                <description><![CDATA[Thank you Jack - that&#039;s the main problem. 2D code could work only when I will scan it with Webcon application. QR code contains hyperlink and could be opened with e.g. google search. It is easier for users.]]></description>
  3525.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Katarzyna)]]></author>
  3526.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4684#msg-5202</guid>
  3527.                <pubDate>Tue, 02 Jul 2024 15:28:41 +0200</pubDate>
  3528.                            </item>
  3529.                    <item>
  3530.                
  3531.                <title><![CDATA[PROPOSAL: Item List Excel Import - Increase Maximum Number of Records to 2001/2501]]></title>
  3532.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5201#msg-5201</link>
  3533.                <description><![CDATA[Hello everyone,in our main application, we need to import address lists from clients. For some time now, we have been hitting the limit of 1000 rows.I would like to suggest reviewing the current server performance to determine if it is now feasible to increase this limit to 2001 (header + 2000 rows) or, ideally, to 2501. This adjustment would significantly ease our workload, as we currently have to manually split the address files.Thank you in advance,Bjoern PollerP.S.: I have already submitted a similar request for the Excel export in DATA TABLEs.]]></description>
  3534.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Bjoern Poller)]]></author>
  3535.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5201#msg-5201</guid>
  3536.                <pubDate>Tue, 02 Jul 2024 15:13:50 +0200</pubDate>
  3537.                            </item>
  3538.                    <item>
  3539.                
  3540.                <title><![CDATA[PROPOSAL: Data Table Export - Increase Maximum Number of Records to 2001/2501]]></title>
  3541.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5200#msg-5200</link>
  3542.                <description><![CDATA[Hello everyone,we frequently encounter situations where it is convenient for us to perform an Excel export of the current state via the DATA TABLE. Recently, we have been hitting the limit of 1000 rows more often (https://docs.webcon.com/docs/2023R3/Studio/Process/Attribute/DataPres/Sql_grid/#7-allow-excel-export).I would like to propose a review of the current server performance to determine if it is now feasible to increase this limit to 2001 (header + 2000 rows) or, ideally, to 2501.This adjustment would significantly ease our workload.Thank you in advance,Bjoern PollerP.S.: I will also submit a similar request for the import of Excel rows into an Item List.]]></description>
  3543.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Bjoern Poller)]]></author>
  3544.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5200#msg-5200</guid>
  3545.                <pubDate>Tue, 02 Jul 2024 15:03:39 +0200</pubDate>
  3546.                            </item>
  3547.                    <item>
  3548.                
  3549.                <title><![CDATA[DOCUMENT TEMPLATE WITH QR CODE]]></title>
  3550.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4684#msg-5196</link>
  3551.                <description><![CDATA[Hi Mark,I&#039;m afraid that the 2d code contains the element ID but not the hyperlink.but I may be wrong...]]></description>
  3552.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Jacek Wojnar)]]></author>
  3553.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4684#msg-5196</guid>
  3554.                <pubDate>Tue, 02 Jul 2024 13:47:57 +0200</pubDate>
  3555.                            </item>
  3556.                    <item>
  3557.                
  3558.                <title><![CDATA[DOCUMENT TEMPLATE WITH QR CODE]]></title>
  3559.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4684#msg-5195</link>
  3560.                <description><![CDATA[Hi Katarzyna. In the document template generation you can find a &quot;2D Code&quot; under System Fields &gt; Information.The 2D Code is a QR code that will link to the process instance.PS. Another cool feature using QR codes is under the start buttons. If you generate a QR code there you can kick off a new process by scanning a QR code.]]></description>
  3561.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Mark Mulder)]]></author>
  3562.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4684#msg-5195</guid>
  3563.                <pubDate>Tue, 02 Jul 2024 13:42:46 +0200</pubDate>
  3564.                            </item>
  3565.                    <item>
  3566.                
  3567.                <title><![CDATA[sql editor - monospace font and not to add newlines]]></title>
  3568.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5159#msg-5173</link>
  3569.                <description><![CDATA[That&#039;s for sure. :)]]></description>
  3570.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Daniel Krüger Cosmo Consult)]]></author>
  3571.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5159#msg-5173</guid>
  3572.                <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jul 2024 14:56:41 +0200</pubDate>
  3573.                            </item>
  3574.                    <item>
  3575.                
  3576.                <title><![CDATA[sql editor - monospace font and not to add newlines]]></title>
  3577.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5159#msg-5169</link>
  3578.                <description><![CDATA[thanks Daniel - nice trick :-)Unfortunately, I need to copy it to SSMS more often (I know, I can use notepad++, but it would be easier if these empty lines simply did not exist ;))]]></description>
  3579.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Jacek Wojnar)]]></author>
  3580.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5159#msg-5169</guid>
  3581.                <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jul 2024 13:28:53 +0200</pubDate>
  3582.                            </item>
  3583.                    <item>
  3584.                
  3585.                <title><![CDATA[sql editor - monospace font and not to add newlines]]></title>
  3586.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5159#msg-5168</link>
  3587.                <description><![CDATA[A neat little trick for this:Copy the output to Notepad++ and use the &quot;Remove empty lines&quot; action. :)]]></description>
  3588.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Daniel Krüger Cosmo Consult)]]></author>
  3589.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5159#msg-5168</guid>
  3590.                <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jul 2024 13:18:45 +0200</pubDate>
  3591.                            </item>
  3592.                    <item>
  3593.                
  3594.                <title><![CDATA[sql editor - monospace font and not to add newlines]]></title>
  3595.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5159#msg-5163</link>
  3596.                <description><![CDATA[ad 1. thanks - so there is hope :-)ad 2. I always have this problem when copying from the expression preview (1). When I copy from the editor it&#039;s OK (2)]]></description>
  3597.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Jacek Wojnar)]]></author>
  3598.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5159#msg-5163</guid>
  3599.                <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jul 2024 08:34:29 +0200</pubDate>
  3600.                            </item>
  3601.                    <item>
  3602.                
  3603.                <title><![CDATA[sql editor - monospace font and not to add newlines]]></title>
  3604.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5159#msg-5162</link>
  3605.                <description><![CDATA[Hi Jack,1. Monospaced fonts are already in backlog - you can see it here: https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/11652. I have same issue at work, but somehow at home I can&#039;t reproduce it - I&#039;ll have to check why it happens then.]]></description>
  3606.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Maksymilian Stachowiak)]]></author>
  3607.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5159#msg-5162</guid>
  3608.                <pubDate>Sat, 29 Jun 2024 23:56:53 +0200</pubDate>
  3609.                            </item>
  3610.                    <item>
  3611.                
  3612.                <title><![CDATA[sql editor - monospace font and not to add newlines]]></title>
  3613.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5159#msg-5159</link>
  3614.                <description><![CDATA[Hi,I would have two ideas/requests (probably simple) regarding the SQL editor1. The SQL query editor should have a monospace font2. The SQL query after copying to SMSS/notepad has unnecessary newlines. Is it possible not to add newlines?regards]]></description>
  3615.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Jacek Wojnar)]]></author>
  3616.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5159#msg-5159</guid>
  3617.                <pubDate>Thu, 27 Jun 2024 12:39:37 +0200</pubDate>
  3618.                            </item>
  3619.                    <item>
  3620.                
  3621.                <title><![CDATA[A small change in the window in Designer Studio for adding/edit user group]]></title>
  3622.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5154#msg-5156</link>
  3623.                <description><![CDATA[Have my upvote - for those using designer studio for managing groups this would be really nice.Although I&#039;m using portal to do it, that is a nice touch :)* Managing groups from bps portal is documented here: https://docs.webcon.com/docs/2023R3/Guides/BPSGroups/#how-to-create-a-group-in-webcon-bps-portal]]></description>
  3624.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Maksymilian Stachowiak)]]></author>
  3625.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5154#msg-5156</guid>
  3626.                <pubDate>Thu, 27 Jun 2024 08:28:36 +0200</pubDate>
  3627.                            </item>
  3628.                    <item>
  3629.                
  3630.                <title><![CDATA[A small change in the window in Designer Studio for adding/edit user group]]></title>
  3631.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5154#msg-5154</link>
  3632.                <description><![CDATA[Is it possible that the window in Designer Studio for adding/edit user group has a flexible [Users] field and a locked [Group owners] field size. The opposite of now.There are usually more users than owners ;)Additionally it would be good if the users were also sorted alphabetically.Regards,]]></description>
  3633.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Jacek Wojnar)]]></author>
  3634.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5154#msg-5154</guid>
  3635.                <pubDate>Wed, 26 Jun 2024 13:48:31 +0200</pubDate>
  3636.                            </item>
  3637.                    <item>
  3638.                
  3639.                <title><![CDATA[[Duplicacte] GUIDS in V_WFElements]]></title>
  3640.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5149#msg-5152</link>
  3641.                <description><![CDATA[When I&#039;m checking for user voices I&#039;m never finding ones, but when i forget to then there is always the one :)I&#039;m closing this thread, and encouraging to vote on Daniels voice: https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4134?messageid=4134]]></description>
  3642.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Maksymilian Stachowiak)]]></author>
  3643.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5149#msg-5152</guid>
  3644.                <pubDate>Tue, 25 Jun 2024 13:32:06 +0200</pubDate>
  3645.                            </item>
  3646.                    <item>
  3647.                
  3648.                <title><![CDATA[[Duplicacte] GUIDS in V_WFElements]]></title>
  3649.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5149#msg-5151</link>
  3650.                <description><![CDATA[Maybe it will be there in BPS 2024. At least it is in the backlog. :)https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4134?messageid=4134]]></description>
  3651.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Daniel Krüger Cosmo Consult)]]></author>
  3652.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5149#msg-5151</guid>
  3653.                <pubDate>Tue, 25 Jun 2024 13:29:21 +0200</pubDate>
  3654.                            </item>
  3655.                    <item>
  3656.                
  3657.                <title><![CDATA[[Duplicacte] GUIDS in V_WFElements]]></title>
  3658.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5149#msg-5150</link>
  3659.                <description><![CDATA[Hi,Completely agree, and I would add that it is similar if we have several content bases, and the processes are somehow interconnected, having in the view given Guid , it would simplify the configuration.Regards.]]></description>
  3660.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Karol Częczek)]]></author>
  3661.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5149#msg-5150</guid>
  3662.                <pubDate>Tue, 25 Jun 2024 12:01:38 +0200</pubDate>
  3663.                            </item>
  3664.                    <item>
  3665.                
  3666.                <title><![CDATA[[Duplicacte] GUIDS in V_WFElements]]></title>
  3667.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5149#msg-5149</link>
  3668.                <description><![CDATA[Please vote for this user voice, as it already have more votes, and is exactly the same ;) https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4134?messageid=4134Hello,when working with custom columns in reports I&#039;m always trying to avoid using regular ID when comparing forms, workflows, processes etc. I&#039;m almost always joining with specific tables to get GUID, so reports won&#039;t break between environments.Inside custom columns we can access wfelems, which as far as i know is based on V_WFElements - if we could get DTYPE_GUID, DEF_GUID, WF_GUID there it would make that process easier - instead of subquery per column, we could get those just from what&#039;s already there :)Example query inside custom column:IIF((SELECT DTYPE_GUID FROM WFDocTypes dt WHERE dt.DTYPE_ID = wfelems.DTYPE_ID) = &#039;51a1dfbc-de3b-4a59-92c5-3342435b0088&#039; /*document guid*/, &#039;Tak&#039;, (  SELECT    CASE WHEN (ISNULL(WFD_AttBool7, 0) = 0 AND ISNULL(WFD_AttBool1, 0) = 0 AND ISNULL(WFD_AttBool2, 0) = 0 AND ISNULL(WFD_AttChoose45_ID, &#039;0&#039;) = &#039;0&#039; AND ISNULL(WFD_AttBool8, 0) = 1) THEN &#039;Tak&#039; ELSE &#039;Nie&#039; END  FROM    WFElements JOIN    WFSteps ON WFD_STPID = STP_ID JOIN    WorkFlows ON WF_ID = STP_WFID  WHERE     WF_GUID = &#039;af556142-7209-44e1-9aa2-550c2cd361cf&#039; AND /* GUID of the workflow */    WFD_ID = wfelems.WFD_AttChoose4_ID /* relation to parent workflow */  ))Would shorten down to:IIF(DTYPE_GUID = &#039;51a1dfbc-de3b-4a59-92c5-3342435b0088&#039; /*document guid*/, &#039;Tak&#039;, (  SELECT    CASE WHEN (ISNULL(WFD_AttBool7, 0) = 0 AND ISNULL(WFD_AttBool1, 0) = 0 AND ISNULL(WFD_AttBool2, 0) = 0 AND ISNULL(WFD_AttChoose45_ID, &#039;0&#039;) = &#039;0&#039; AND ISNULL(WFD_AttBool8, 0) = 1) THEN &#039;Tak&#039; ELSE &#039;Nie&#039; END  FROM    V_WFElements  WHERE    WF_GUID = &#039;af556142-7209-44e1-9aa2-550c2cd361cf&#039; AND /* GUID of the workflow */    WFD_ID = wfelems.WFD_AttChoose4_ID /* relation to parent workflow */  ))Less joins, and no subquery :)]]></description>
  3669.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Maksymilian Stachowiak)]]></author>
  3670.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5149#msg-5149</guid>
  3671.                <pubDate>Tue, 25 Jun 2024 11:24:05 +0200</pubDate>
  3672.                            </item>
  3673.                    <item>
  3674.                
  3675.                <title><![CDATA[Gantt chart as native report type]]></title>
  3676.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5141#msg-5141</link>
  3677.                <description><![CDATA[Any progress with Gantt chart in webcon as native report type ?I see topics since 2020 and always is in backlog ...]]></description>
  3678.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Paweł Tołoczko)]]></author>
  3679.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5141#msg-5141</guid>
  3680.                <pubDate>Fri, 21 Jun 2024 22:23:09 +0200</pubDate>
  3681.                            </item>
  3682.                    <item>
  3683.                
  3684.                <title><![CDATA[Options for admin available immediately]]></title>
  3685.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5127#msg-5131</link>
  3686.                <description><![CDATA[Hi,I would like to add the following:I&#039;m assuming that the &quot;Privileges&quot; and &quot;Timeout execution statistics&quot; actions don&#039;t change the workflow instance itself. It would be great to have these available in view mode. Especially during testing it happens, that the workflow instance is checked out by the test user.Best regardsDaniel]]></description>
  3687.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Daniel Krüger Cosmo Consult)]]></author>
  3688.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5127#msg-5131</guid>
  3689.                <pubDate>Fri, 21 Jun 2024 08:44:00 +0200</pubDate>
  3690.                            </item>
  3691.                    <item>
  3692.                
  3693.                <title><![CDATA[Options for admin available immediately]]></title>
  3694.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5127#msg-5127</link>
  3695.                <description><![CDATA[Hi,Having admin privileges on a given element, it would be very convenient to have access to at least 2 options such as: permission check and task completion.Now you need to perform 3 operations1. enter admin mode2. expand admin actions3. select the action in questionRegards]]></description>
  3696.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Karol Częczek)]]></author>
  3697.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5127#msg-5127</guid>
  3698.                <pubDate>Thu, 20 Jun 2024 16:25:14 +0200</pubDate>
  3699.                            </item>
  3700.                    <item>
  3701.                
  3702.                <title><![CDATA[Private view with search parameters]]></title>
  3703.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5125#msg-5125</link>
  3704.                <description><![CDATA[Hi,With reference to Krystian&#039;s submission https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5118/15Perhaps it would be possible to add that the applied parameters in the search panel could also be saved when creating a private view for a report.Regards.]]></description>
  3705.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Karol Częczek)]]></author>
  3706.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5125#msg-5125</guid>
  3707.                <pubDate>Thu, 20 Jun 2024 16:12:05 +0200</pubDate>
  3708.                            </item>
  3709.                    <item>
  3710.                
  3711.                <title><![CDATA[Reports - narrowing filter by phrase with the ability to save a private view for users]]></title>
  3712.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5118#msg-5118</link>
  3713.                <description><![CDATA[A good and useful option for system users would be the ability to create filters on a column using a narrowing phrase. For example, by entering the phrase &quot;BX2TD6&quot; in the column filter with the function &quot;contains phrase,&quot; users could create such a private view without having to mark each result. Each time this view is opened, it would present the results for that phrase.Currently, results need to be marked manually, or such a report with an SQL filter has to be created administratively.]]></description>
  3714.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Krystian Golik)]]></author>
  3715.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5118#msg-5118</guid>
  3716.                <pubDate>Thu, 20 Jun 2024 12:16:46 +0200</pubDate>
  3717.                            </item>
  3718.                    <item>
  3719.                
  3720.                <title><![CDATA[Social interactions within WEBCON BPS]]></title>
  3721.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4957#msg-5100</link>
  3722.                <description><![CDATA[Hi, everyoneJust to add more value - i can confirm, that few days ago i&#039;ve received same question if that would be possible.Right now we are solving it with starting a &#039;Notification&#039; subworkflow, where you have a &#039;comment&#039; long field, and picker to choose receipents. On path it sends notification, and updates original form with a regular comment.]]></description>
  3723.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Maksymilian Stachowiak)]]></author>
  3724.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4957#msg-5100</guid>
  3725.                <pubDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2024 08:05:46 +0200</pubDate>
  3726.                            </item>
  3727.                    <item>
  3728.                
  3729.                <title><![CDATA[Collapsing Attachments by Category in the &#039;All Attachments&#039; Tab]]></title>
  3730.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4900#msg-5099</link>
  3731.                <description><![CDATA[We&#039;re reviewing your suggestion. Stay tuned :)]]></description>
  3732.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Michal Rykiert)]]></author>
  3733.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4900#msg-5099</guid>
  3734.                <pubDate>Mon, 17 Jun 2024 16:57:25 +0200</pubDate>
  3735.                            </item>
  3736.                    <item>
  3737.                
  3738.                <title><![CDATA[Merge WORD / JPGs / PNGs and save as PDFs and few PDFs save as PDF file as native automation]]></title>
  3739.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4915#msg-5098</link>
  3740.                <description><![CDATA[It sure make sense. Let us evaluate a possibility of adding it to the roadmap.]]></description>
  3741.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Michal Rykiert)]]></author>
  3742.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4915#msg-5098</guid>
  3743.                <pubDate>Mon, 17 Jun 2024 16:56:48 +0200</pubDate>
  3744.                            </item>
  3745.                    <item>
  3746.                
  3747.                <title><![CDATA[Allow to overwrite existing Pdf when converting a Word document to Pdf]]></title>
  3748.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4917#msg-5097</link>
  3749.                <description><![CDATA[We&#039;re putting it under review.]]></description>
  3750.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Michal Rykiert)]]></author>
  3751.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4917#msg-5097</guid>
  3752.                <pubDate>Mon, 17 Jun 2024 16:55:53 +0200</pubDate>
  3753.                            </item>
  3754.                    <item>
  3755.                
  3756.                <title><![CDATA[Edit Dashboard: Always visible menu bar]]></title>
  3757.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4931#msg-5096</link>
  3758.                <description><![CDATA[We&#039;re putting it under review :)]]></description>
  3759.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Michal Rykiert)]]></author>
  3760.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4931#msg-5096</guid>
  3761.                <pubDate>Mon, 17 Jun 2024 16:55:08 +0200</pubDate>
  3762.                            </item>
  3763.                    <item>
  3764.                
  3765.                <title><![CDATA[Add an own option for setting only id of a choose field]]></title>
  3766.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4936#msg-5095</link>
  3767.                <description><![CDATA[Hi Daniel,we&#039;re going to review your case internally and see how we can address it proprerly. Stay tuned.]]></description>
  3768.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Michal Rykiert)]]></author>
  3769.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4936#msg-5095</guid>
  3770.                <pubDate>Mon, 17 Jun 2024 16:54:30 +0200</pubDate>
  3771.                            </item>
  3772.                    <item>
  3773.                
  3774.                <title><![CDATA[Social interactions within WEBCON BPS]]></title>
  3775.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4957#msg-5094</link>
  3776.                <description><![CDATA[Hi Arno, we see an added value in what you&#039;re suggesting, although it&#039;s one of those effort-intensive features. We will analyze the feasibility of addind these kind of social interactions in v. 2025 (v. 2024 is already planned out completely).]]></description>
  3777.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Michal Rykiert)]]></author>
  3778.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4957#msg-5094</guid>
  3779.                <pubDate>Mon, 17 Jun 2024 16:53:17 +0200</pubDate>
  3780.                            </item>
  3781.                    <item>
  3782.                
  3783.                <title><![CDATA[SUGGESTION: Please check the max. count of executions in GLOBAL ACTIONS - (I believe it is 65,536, may cause problems e.g. after 1.87 years)]]></title>
  3784.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4988#msg-5093</link>
  3785.                <description><![CDATA[Let us analyze and try to re-create the scenario you have. It&#039;s definitely quite a rare one to happen :)]]></description>
  3786.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Michal Rykiert)]]></author>
  3787.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4988#msg-5093</guid>
  3788.                <pubDate>Mon, 17 Jun 2024 16:47:53 +0200</pubDate>
  3789.                            </item>
  3790.                    <item>
  3791.                
  3792.                <title><![CDATA[SUGGESTION: MIX BETWEEN PICTURE AND HANDWRITTEN SIGNATURE FORM FIELD]]></title>
  3793.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4990#msg-5092</link>
  3794.                <description><![CDATA[Hi Bjoern,thanks for the suggestion. Let us see if there&#039;s more people needing this before we make a decision what to do with it. It&#039;s suffucient to vote by pressing the thumbs up button :)]]></description>
  3795.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Michal Rykiert)]]></author>
  3796.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4990#msg-5092</guid>
  3797.                <pubDate>Mon, 17 Jun 2024 16:45:29 +0200</pubDate>
  3798.                            </item>
  3799.                    <item>
  3800.                
  3801.                <title><![CDATA[Add ISO Week Numbers to Date Picker]]></title>
  3802.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4992#msg-5091</link>
  3803.                <description><![CDATA[Hi Arno, we&#039;ll analyze your suggestion and decide what to do about it against other priorities in the backlog. In the meantime, let&#039;s see if there&#039;s more people needing this.]]></description>
  3804.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Michal Rykiert)]]></author>
  3805.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4992#msg-5091</guid>
  3806.                <pubDate>Mon, 17 Jun 2024 16:43:04 +0200</pubDate>
  3807.                            </item>
  3808.                    <item>
  3809.                
  3810.                <title><![CDATA[Enhanced configuration of allowed/expected attachment filetypes]]></title>
  3811.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5032#msg-5090</link>
  3812.                <description><![CDATA[Hi Markus,your suggestion makes sense. We&#039;re putting it into the backlog. Stay tuned!]]></description>
  3813.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Michal Rykiert)]]></author>
  3814.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5032#msg-5090</guid>
  3815.                <pubDate>Mon, 17 Jun 2024 16:40:50 +0200</pubDate>
  3816.                            </item>
  3817.                    <item>
  3818.                
  3819.                <title><![CDATA[Path - add Tab used / connect automations with path]]></title>
  3820.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5089#msg-5089</link>
  3821.                <description><![CDATA[Probably in 2023 is not present &quot;used&quot; in path &quot;properties&quot; ... I&#039;m using 2022.1.4.404 and if i want to see where the path is used ... I need to &quot;delete path&quot; because:- in path - I don&#039;t have attribute property &quot;used&quot;- on automation is not showing where on path is used ... - if is deleted it show connection but there is no &quot;link by click&quot; to jump to Automation / form automation to pathsee attachments ...]]></description>
  3822.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Paweł Tołoczko)]]></author>
  3823.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5089#msg-5089</guid>
  3824.                <pubDate>Mon, 17 Jun 2024 11:40:15 +0200</pubDate>
  3825.                            </item>
  3826.                    <item>
  3827.                
  3828.                <title><![CDATA[SDK: Option to overwrite/extend notification actions]]></title>
  3829.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5053#msg-5064</link>
  3830.                <description><![CDATA[We thought of something similar but rejected the intermediate SMTP.WEBCON has a queue for handling any errors when sending mails. We haven&#039;t tested it, but in our opinion the intermediate server adds another level of complexity and requires an own monitoring / error handling. Besides this, the mail would be marked as send in the history while it may has not been send.]]></description>
  3831.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Daniel Krüger Cosmo Consult)]]></author>
  3832.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5053#msg-5064</guid>
  3833.                <pubDate>Tue, 11 Jun 2024 17:01:29 +0200</pubDate>
  3834.                            </item>
  3835.                    <item>
  3836.                
  3837.                <title><![CDATA[SDK: Option to overwrite/extend notification actions]]></title>
  3838.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5053#msg-5058</link>
  3839.                <description><![CDATA[The described approach of intercepting outgoing notifications offers way more flexibility than our recently implemented PoC.For this PoC, we implemented an SMTP-Server that is redirecting the standard e-mail notifications to MS Teams for internal recipients whilst external recipients still receive e-mails.]]></description>
  3840.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Markus Jenni)]]></author>
  3841.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5053#msg-5058</guid>
  3842.                <pubDate>Tue, 11 Jun 2024 11:10:01 +0200</pubDate>
  3843.                            </item>
  3844.                    <item>
  3845.                
  3846.                <title><![CDATA[Concat - Vertical Layout]]></title>
  3847.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5057#msg-5057</link>
  3848.                <description><![CDATA[Hello,for AND&#039;s and OR&#039;s inside business rules we have ability to change layout from horizontal to vertical, which helps to keep it nice and tidy.Few times i&#039;ve used concat, which got really long - see attachment.Maybe we could get vertical layout for concat? :)]]></description>
  3849.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Maksymilian Stachowiak)]]></author>
  3850.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5057#msg-5057</guid>
  3851.                <pubDate>Tue, 11 Jun 2024 10:49:41 +0200</pubDate>
  3852.                            </item>
  3853.                    <item>
  3854.                
  3855.                <title><![CDATA[SDK: Option to overwrite/extend notification actions]]></title>
  3856.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5053#msg-5053</link>
  3857.                <description><![CDATA[Hi,at the moment we have to decide whether we want to send a standard or custom notification (mail).  While some users receive only a few mails this way, other receive to many and want to receive only a summary  on a scheduled interval. While we can and have implement a configuration for an application on process level this is still limited and makes the automations less readable while the option to send a mail with a task can not bused at all.My suggestion would be to provide an plugin/extension for the existing &quot;send mail actions&quot;. Provided options of the plugin:- Current information of the context like, process, workflow instance, recipients, settings etc. Basically everything which is configured in the custom notification but not only for this but also for the &quot;send standard notification&quot; action.- Option to declare that the action was already executed and no mail needs to be send.- Custom /additional log messageThis plugin could be selected on:- Global level- Per process- Per workflow- For a custom notification actionThis would allow us to intercept all process related mails without changing the configuration itself with a lot of &quot;if&quot; operators.Besides this one other major benefit would be that we can provide our own notification type for a process.For example, we could define for a process that a &quot;notification&quot; is no longer a mail:- We could send a Teams message - Send an additional SMS- Write to a custom database- Call a REST API to store the &quot;notification&quot; in an external system.I&#039;m aware that this  is not at least supported at the moment and you can achieve this already with the current options, but it requires a dedicated implementation for each mail instead of a general approach.It may also be a stupid idea and I only came up with it as I&#039;m also a developer at heart who tends to abstract more than necessary. :)Best regards,Daniel]]></description>
  3858.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Daniel Krüger Cosmo Consult)]]></author>
  3859.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5053#msg-5053</guid>
  3860.                <pubDate>Sun, 09 Jun 2024 13:09:11 +0200</pubDate>
  3861.                            </item>
  3862.                    <item>
  3863.                
  3864.                <title><![CDATA[Create E-Mail Template from Configurable Mail]]></title>
  3865.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5050#msg-5050</link>
  3866.                <description><![CDATA[Hello,In many places we are able to create Process Business Rule from rule typed in a field (visibility, required, and many others). Similarly with form rules.I have a case, where i need to use same mail that is already being used, but to different people. (exactly 12 contents).Right now it requires manual creation of templates by copy-pasting them from action into e-mail template.Could we have &#039;Create e-mail template&#039; from configurable e-mail action?]]></description>
  3867.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Maksymilian Stachowiak)]]></author>
  3868.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5050#msg-5050</guid>
  3869.                <pubDate>Fri, 07 Jun 2024 15:09:42 +0200</pubDate>
  3870.                            </item>
  3871.                    <item>
  3872.                
  3873.                <title><![CDATA[I would like to: In Group put Tabs and then in each Tab put Groups]]></title>
  3874.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5049#msg-5049</link>
  3875.                <description><![CDATA[I don&#039;t know how you, but I miss Groups in Tabs .. I can do Group and then put Tabs ...I can do Tabs and put Group in each Tab .. but ...I can&#039;t do Group with Tabs and then in each tab put group ... :/why? 1. I have form with lot of groups I would like to on each step put some groups on each tab to manage the order in form ...2. Groups can be expanded and collapsed ... so in each tab I can collapse groups but the main Tab with tabs unfortunately not ... because I can not put in group ...3. In each step I need to Break global order because:- step 1 i have some groups with attributes &quot;on top&quot; that collected data and on step 2 they are in tabin step 2 I collect data and in step 3 I put to tab 2 .. ect ...I have 70-80 attributes on form and probably I will add another 30-50 ... I would like to order them in proper groups and because some groups are in each step then ... I need one by one move to tab ... and they are (can) mix ...I cant march few attributes and move to each tab ... I can move group but not to tab ... it is time consuming ... and is easier to turn off visibility of group than each attribute ...]]></description>
  3876.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Paweł Tołoczko)]]></author>
  3877.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5049#msg-5049</guid>
  3878.                <pubDate>Fri, 07 Jun 2024 14:52:55 +0200</pubDate>
  3879.                            </item>
  3880.                    <item>
  3881.                
  3882.                <title><![CDATA[Enhanced configuration of allowed/expected attachment filetypes]]></title>
  3883.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5032#msg-5032</link>
  3884.                <description><![CDATA[Administrators can configure the allowed types of attachments globally. However, there are situations, where we like to only allow certain content types, e.g. pdf&#039;s, that are a subset of the globally allowed attachments.Currently, the only way to restrict is the usage of validation rules.For usability reasons, it would be much better, to be able to restrict the allowed document types. With a little bit of javascript it is possible to set the accept attribute of the input field. The open file dialogue reflects the accept attribute and would filter the corresponding file types.However, this has no impact when drag&#039;n drop a file. In this case, only the globally allowed types are checked (maybe there is a JavaScript workaround, which I did not see up to now).It would be great to have the possibility to configure the allowed file extensions in the already available configuration section of the attachments.]]></description>
  3885.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Markus Jenni)]]></author>
  3886.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/5032#msg-5032</guid>
  3887.                <pubDate>Wed, 05 Jun 2024 15:32:52 +0200</pubDate>
  3888.                            </item>
  3889.                    <item>
  3890.                
  3891.                <title><![CDATA[Diagnostic mode: Log outgoing connections of data sources]]></title>
  3892.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4627#msg-5031</link>
  3893.                <description><![CDATA[Hi Daniel,can you please see if OpenTelemetry would solve your case? https://community.webcon.com/posts/post/opentelemetry-in-webcon-bps/403/3]]></description>
  3894.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Michal Rykiert)]]></author>
  3895.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4627#msg-5031</guid>
  3896.                <pubDate>Wed, 05 Jun 2024 14:27:57 +0200</pubDate>
  3897.                            </item>
  3898.                    <item>
  3899.                
  3900.                <title><![CDATA[SUGGESTION: Please check the max. count of executions in GLOBAL ACTIONS - (I believe it is 65,536, may cause problems e.g. after 1.87 years)]]></title>
  3901.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4988#msg-5030</link>
  3902.                <description><![CDATA[Hi Bjoern, any specific use case why are you updating every 15 minutes without any time limit?It would be easier to suggest any other solutions :)]]></description>
  3903.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Maksymilian Stachowiak)]]></author>
  3904.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4988#msg-5030</guid>
  3905.                <pubDate>Wed, 05 Jun 2024 14:24:40 +0200</pubDate>
  3906.                            </item>
  3907.                    <item>
  3908.                
  3909.                <title><![CDATA[Restoring old feature: Display constant group with context menu in rule]]></title>
  3910.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4530#msg-5029</link>
  3911.                <description><![CDATA[I&#039;m changing the status to &quot;done&quot;.]]></description>
  3912.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Michal Rykiert)]]></author>
  3913.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4530#msg-5029</guid>
  3914.                <pubDate>Wed, 05 Jun 2024 14:21:19 +0200</pubDate>
  3915.                            </item>
  3916.                    <item>
  3917.                
  3918.                <title><![CDATA[Social interactions within WEBCON BPS]]></title>
  3919.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4957#msg-5016</link>
  3920.                <description><![CDATA[Hi ArnoThank you for coming up with this suggestion. Mentioning users in the comment field is a quite commonly asked feature. I would also suggest that with a future notification system, it should be possible to send notifications from a background task.Best regardsMarkus]]></description>
  3921.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Markus Jenni)]]></author>
  3922.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4957#msg-5016</guid>
  3923.                <pubDate>Tue, 04 Jun 2024 08:28:09 +0200</pubDate>
  3924.                            </item>
  3925.                    <item>
  3926.                
  3927.                <title><![CDATA[Add ISO Week Numbers to Date Picker]]></title>
  3928.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4992#msg-4995</link>
  3929.                <description><![CDATA[Thanks for your reply Bjoern. I have created something of a workaround for it. See screenshot.Year is selected automatically, but could also be changed to next year.Week number can be typed and when pressing enter the range is displayed and the start date on Monday is filled.Best regards, Arno]]></description>
  3930.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Arno van der Heijden)]]></author>
  3931.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4992#msg-4995</guid>
  3932.                <pubDate>Thu, 30 May 2024 17:02:54 +0200</pubDate>
  3933.                            </item>
  3934.                    <item>
  3935.                
  3936.                <title><![CDATA[Add ISO Week Numbers to Date Picker]]></title>
  3937.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4992#msg-4994</link>
  3938.                <description><![CDATA[Hi Arno,while waiting on an integration, maybe this could be a work-around for displaying the ISO week after picking a dateOR the base for picking an ISO week and than displaying a choice field with the seven possible days:See the attached picture (we use it as global business rule as part of our library):Business Rule with SQL:   select datepart(iso_week, &#039;{BRP:365}&#039;) with {BRP:365} = Parameter in date formatIn our case, we use TEXT as return value (we use it as info column in reports), in some other cases this could be a problem with sorting (1,11,12,..,2,20,..), butchanging the return value type should not be the problem ;-).Hope this helps for now,Bjoern]]></description>
  3939.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Bjoern Poller)]]></author>
  3940.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4992#msg-4994</guid>
  3941.                <pubDate>Thu, 30 May 2024 16:29:04 +0200</pubDate>
  3942.                            </item>
  3943.                    <item>
  3944.                
  3945.                <title><![CDATA[Add ISO Week Numbers to Date Picker]]></title>
  3946.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4992#msg-4992</link>
  3947.                <description><![CDATA[For a customer we need ISO week numbers integrated into the date picker feature. Sales managers schedule promotions with forecasts, which they need to transfer to demand planners. This process relies heavily on identifying the correct week number. Currently, they have to open Outlook to cross-reference week numbers with corresponding dates, which is time-consuming and disrupts their workflow.Feature Request:ISO Week Number Display: Include ISO week numbers (ISO-8601) in the date picker interface. This will allow users to quickly identify the week number alongside the date.]]></description>
  3948.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Arno van der Heijden)]]></author>
  3949.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4992#msg-4992</guid>
  3950.                <pubDate>Thu, 30 May 2024 10:23:55 +0200</pubDate>
  3951.                            </item>
  3952.                    <item>
  3953.                
  3954.                <title><![CDATA[SUGGESTION: MIX BETWEEN PICTURE AND HANDWRITTEN SIGNATURE FORM FIELD]]></title>
  3955.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4990#msg-4991</link>
  3956.                <description><![CDATA[For all playing around by them selfs, I got a working tip from Markus Jenni in 2023,so I could change the color of the pencil once (preset):SOLVED -&gt; Q: IS IT POSSIBLE TO CHANGE THE PENCIL COLOR IN &quot;HANDWRITTEN SIGNATURE&quot; FORM FIELD https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/3409]]></description>
  3957.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Bjoern Poller)]]></author>
  3958.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4990#msg-4991</guid>
  3959.                <pubDate>Wed, 29 May 2024 19:16:33 +0200</pubDate>
  3960.                            </item>
  3961.                    <item>
  3962.                
  3963.                <title><![CDATA[SUGGESTION: MIX BETWEEN PICTURE AND HANDWRITTEN SIGNATURE FORM FIELD]]></title>
  3964.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4990#msg-4990</link>
  3965.                <description><![CDATA[I already posted my idea in 2022 (26.09.2022: https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/2230),but i have a new project in August, where such a feature would be nice. I have some ideas for a plugin(as far as I remeber, a problem is the DPI from the Signature field being higher than of picture fields)-&gt; Wouldn&#039;t that be a nice new feature?26.09.2022: ========Hello WEBCON,we are working on a prototype to document defects. Therefore, we would like to use a new kind of form field:It should act as an image field to upload an image, but then act as a handwritten signature form field to mark something on the image.We tried that with the existing elements and it worked in a way. But the image scaling isn&#039;t really good, we couldn&#039;t change the pencil color and so on.So as a suggestion: Please combine these two form fields to create a pimped signature/image field. This could create more possible applications.Until then,BjoernP.S.: The added picture shows a &quot;Handwritten signature&quot; form field into that the contents of a picture form field was copied and the signature pencil was used to mark something.]]></description>
  3966.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Bjoern Poller)]]></author>
  3967.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4990#msg-4990</guid>
  3968.                <pubDate>Wed, 29 May 2024 19:10:49 +0200</pubDate>
  3969.                            </item>
  3970.                    <item>
  3971.                
  3972.                <title><![CDATA[Merge WORD / JPGs / PNGs and save as PDFs and few PDFs save as PDF file as native automation]]></title>
  3973.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4915#msg-4989</link>
  3974.                <description><![CDATA[Just last week, i noticed the need to merge selected PDFs to one PDF.So I am with you.Bye, Bjoern]]></description>
  3975.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Bjoern Poller)]]></author>
  3976.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4915#msg-4989</guid>
  3977.                <pubDate>Wed, 29 May 2024 18:58:56 +0200</pubDate>
  3978.                            </item>
  3979.                    <item>
  3980.                
  3981.                <title><![CDATA[SUGGESTION: Please check the max. count of executions in GLOBAL ACTIONS - (I believe it is 65,536, may cause problems e.g. after 1.87 years)]]></title>
  3982.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4988#msg-4988</link>
  3983.                <description><![CDATA[Version 2023.1.3.29A few weeks ago, I encountered a problem with a GLOBAL ACTION (on start cyclic) in an older process. It stopped working (unfortunately, I do not have a screenshot of the error message). Restarting did not resolve the issue.I noticed that the execution count had reached 65,536. Even after stopping and restarting (which reset the count to 0),it still didn&#039;t work. I had to create a new GLOBAL ACTION, deactivate the old one, and then everything worked fine again.Since the cycle is set to every 15 minutes, this error will likely recur after approximately 1.87 years.Question: Could you please confirm if the maximum execution count is 65,536?USER VOICE: Could you suggest a solution to prevent this problem in the future?Thanks,Bjoern]]></description>
  3984.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Bjoern Poller)]]></author>
  3985.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4988#msg-4988</guid>
  3986.                <pubDate>Wed, 29 May 2024 18:54:21 +0200</pubDate>
  3987.                            </item>
  3988.                    <item>
  3989.                
  3990.                <title><![CDATA[Social interactions within WEBCON BPS]]></title>
  3991.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4957#msg-4960</link>
  3992.                <description><![CDATA[Hi Daniel,Normally I&#039;m patient waiting for new functionality. In this case my best customer asked for this functionality. After talking to support decided tot add it to user voice again.Best regards,Arno]]></description>
  3993.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Arno van der Heijden)]]></author>
  3994.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4957#msg-4960</guid>
  3995.                <pubDate>Tue, 28 May 2024 08:39:14 +0200</pubDate>
  3996.                            </item>
  3997.                    <item>
  3998.                
  3999.                <title><![CDATA[Social interactions within WEBCON BPS]]></title>
  4000.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4957#msg-4958</link>
  4001.                <description><![CDATA[Hi Arno, you are not the only one, who would like to have this feature. :)https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/3170Best regards,Daniel]]></description>
  4002.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Daniel Krüger Cosmo Consult)]]></author>
  4003.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4957#msg-4958</guid>
  4004.                <pubDate>Tue, 28 May 2024 06:41:28 +0200</pubDate>
  4005.                            </item>
  4006.                    <item>
  4007.                
  4008.                <title><![CDATA[Social interactions within WEBCON BPS]]></title>
  4009.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4957#msg-4957</link>
  4010.                <description><![CDATA[Dear WEBCON Team,I would like to propose a new feature to enhance social interactions within WEBCON BPS: the ability to tag other users in the comments field. This would function similarly to tagging features on popular social media platforms, allowing users to directly mention and engage with colleagues within the platform.Additionally, it would be highly beneficial to receive alerts when someone tags you in a comment. This notification system would ensure that important mentions are not missed and would significantly improve communication and collaboration within the platform.Thank you for considering this request. I believe these features would greatly enhance the user experience and foster a more connected and interactive environment within WEBCON BPS.Best regards,Arno van der Heijden]]></description>
  4011.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Arno van der Heijden)]]></author>
  4012.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4957#msg-4957</guid>
  4013.                <pubDate>Mon, 27 May 2024 19:54:23 +0200</pubDate>
  4014.                            </item>
  4015.                    <item>
  4016.                
  4017.                <title><![CDATA[Column-Level Grouping on Main Forms]]></title>
  4018.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4619#msg-4956</link>
  4019.                <description><![CDATA[Fully agreed, the first time I was looking for it it took me some time and I was asking where to find it :)]]></description>
  4020.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Dominik Cholewinski)]]></author>
  4021.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4619#msg-4956</guid>
  4022.                <pubDate>Mon, 27 May 2024 13:26:02 +0200</pubDate>
  4023.                            </item>
  4024.                    <item>
  4025.                
  4026.                <title><![CDATA[Forum: Support deep links to headers in knowledge base post]]></title>
  4027.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4948#msg-4950</link>
  4028.                <description><![CDATA[It would be great feature to have, it&#039;s always better to link to specific part of article, as we can do with docs (https://docs.webcon.com/docs/2023R3/Default) :)]]></description>
  4029.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Maksymilian Stachowiak)]]></author>
  4030.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4948#msg-4950</guid>
  4031.                <pubDate>Mon, 27 May 2024 10:37:14 +0200</pubDate>
  4032.                            </item>
  4033.                    <item>
  4034.                
  4035.                <title><![CDATA[Forum: Support deep links to headers in knowledge base post]]></title>
  4036.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4948#msg-4948</link>
  4037.                <description><![CDATA[Hi,in my latest post I wanted to link to a header of an knowledge base post. Unfortunately, there&#039;s no option to create a link pointing to a header like this one:https://daniels-notes.de/posts/2024/translations#bps-portalTherefore I had to write:Search for the term &quot;Using the application and Edit mode&quot; in the linked post, to see how it is done.https://community.webcon.com/posts/post/from-prototype-to-production-deployed-application-edit-mode-in-webcon-bps-portal/381/3It would be great if we could directly link to a header. This would not only be helpful for blog post but also when answering forum questions.https://community.webcon.com/posts/post/from-prototype-to-production-deployed-application-edit-mode-in-webcon-bps-portal/381/3#Using-the-application-and-Edit-modeBest regards,Daniel]]></description>
  4038.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Daniel Krüger Cosmo Consult)]]></author>
  4039.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4948#msg-4948</guid>
  4040.                <pubDate>Sun, 26 May 2024 19:03:03 +0200</pubDate>
  4041.                            </item>
  4042.                    <item>
  4043.                
  4044.                <title><![CDATA[Add an own option for setting only id of a choose field]]></title>
  4045.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4936#msg-4937</link>
  4046.                <description><![CDATA[Can confirm, that the need to assign id and name can be quite painfull. I fully support this suggestion.]]></description>
  4047.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Markus Jenni)]]></author>
  4048.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4936#msg-4937</guid>
  4049.                <pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2024 14:17:00 +0200</pubDate>
  4050.                            </item>
  4051.                    <item>
  4052.                
  4053.                <title><![CDATA[Add an own option for setting only id of a choose field]]></title>
  4054.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4936#msg-4936</link>
  4055.                <description><![CDATA[Hi,could we please get an option to define whether we want to set a choose field or only the id of the choose field?See the attachment as one example. I have an item list with a drop down and a fixed sql statement with multilingual values.Assigning the id to the column in a for each loop does not resolve the display name and the &quot;id&quot; value is treated as the display name. The &quot;solution&quot; aka workaround is to set the id and display name.That&#039;s *beep beep beep beep*.Could we please have an option to choose whether we want to:- set the choose field - or only the id of the choose field. The display name should then be resolved automatically. I know, that this works in some cases, but I have implemented enough work arounds where it didn&#039;t work.I would like to have this option everywhere where a field can be set. A list of actions which come to mind:- Change single field- Change multiple fields- All Item list actions- Start workflow- Start workflow (SQL), maybe we could use the name of the calculated column WFD_AttChooseX_ID to tell the system to set the id- Move workflow (SQL), maybe we could use the name of the calculated column WFD_AttChooseX_ID to tell the system to set the id- Invoke REST web service (Assign response values)I can not remember a case where I would like to actually set the display name. Maybe there was one, but in 99% of all cases I&#039;m only using the id and in 99% of the cases the data source of the choose field is neither an a REST nor a SOAP data source, so resolving the display name would be fast.Best regards,Daniel]]></description>
  4056.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Daniel Krüger Cosmo Consult)]]></author>
  4057.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4936#msg-4936</guid>
  4058.                <pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2024 22:31:06 +0200</pubDate>
  4059.                            </item>
  4060.                    <item>
  4061.                
  4062.                <title><![CDATA[Configuring the SDK with Local Parameter]]></title>
  4063.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4909#msg-4935</link>
  4064.                <description><![CDATA[Hi,I tested in 2023 and it works.I tested it in 2022 and it is okay, but when I used the &quot;foreach&quot; operation, I did not see the local parameters.Thanks,Raluca]]></description>
  4065.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Raluca-Mirabela Lupu)]]></author>
  4066.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4909#msg-4935</guid>
  4067.                <pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2024 13:02:31 +0200</pubDate>
  4068.                            </item>
  4069.                    <item>
  4070.                
  4071.                <title><![CDATA[Configuring the SDK with Local Parameter]]></title>
  4072.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4909#msg-4933</link>
  4073.                <description><![CDATA[Thanks Kamil for response, I&#039;ve checked it on 2023.1.3.131, and it seems that local parameters are indeed available in SDK actions (attachment - automation on process level).Raluca, did I misunderstood it? :)]]></description>
  4074.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Maksymilian Stachowiak)]]></author>
  4075.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4909#msg-4933</guid>
  4076.                <pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2024 09:51:44 +0200</pubDate>
  4077.                            </item>
  4078.                    <item>
  4079.                
  4080.                <title><![CDATA[Configuring the SDK with Local Parameter]]></title>
  4081.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4909#msg-4932</link>
  4082.                <description><![CDATA[Hi Raluca,When it comes to local parameters, they can definitely be used in the SDK. For example, you can pass their value from the {AUTP_Value:x} tag to ConfigEditableText or pass their id (AUTP:x) and use the typed collection in the action context like this: args.Context.AutomationParams.GetByID(1).SetValue(value);As for the SDK business rules, they can also be parameterized. You need to create a global or process rule and create any parameters for it. You can then use these parameters in the sdk configuration using tags as in the screenshots below.]]></description>
  4083.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Kamil Skrzypiec)]]></author>
  4084.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4909#msg-4932</guid>
  4085.                <pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2024 09:41:48 +0200</pubDate>
  4086.                            </item>
  4087.                    <item>
  4088.                
  4089.                <title><![CDATA[Edit Dashboard: Always visible menu bar]]></title>
  4090.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4931#msg-4931</link>
  4091.                <description><![CDATA[Hi,it would really be great, to always see the menu bar, so that you don&#039;t have to scroll all the way up to save a dashboard.Ok, maybe it&#039;s just us who have long dashboards, as we added some CSS/JS so that report tiles float left. This way, we can have more tiles in one row while they take up less space.Best regards,Daniel]]></description>
  4092.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Daniel Krüger Cosmo Consult)]]></author>
  4093.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4931#msg-4931</guid>
  4094.                <pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2024 07:53:08 +0200</pubDate>
  4095.                            </item>
  4096.                    <item>
  4097.                
  4098.                <title><![CDATA[Configuring the SDK with Local Parameter]]></title>
  4099.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4909#msg-4929</link>
  4100.                <description><![CDATA[I&#039;m not facing this issue yet, but I&#039;m surprised that it&#039;s not implemented - I would assume that SDK actions can use local parameters, as any other action.]]></description>
  4101.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Maksymilian Stachowiak)]]></author>
  4102.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4909#msg-4929</guid>
  4103.                <pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2024 19:05:55 +0200</pubDate>
  4104.                            </item>
  4105.                    <item>
  4106.                
  4107.                <title><![CDATA[Collapsing Attachments by Category in the &#039;All Attachments&#039; Tab]]></title>
  4108.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4900#msg-4928</link>
  4109.                <description><![CDATA[I&#039;ve had similar request - defining to expand or collapse all attachments (right now i think there is default collapse when there is more than 4 files attached), but this would solve my case too.]]></description>
  4110.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Maksymilian Stachowiak)]]></author>
  4111.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4900#msg-4928</guid>
  4112.                <pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2024 19:04:25 +0200</pubDate>
  4113.                            </item>
  4114.                    <item>
  4115.                
  4116.                <title><![CDATA[Addition of a global automation error handling configuration.]]></title>
  4117.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4874#msg-4927</link>
  4118.                <description><![CDATA[I&#039;m currently creating such notifications in some new integrations, or critical ones, to ensure that there will be a quick action, and fix to it.Having a global ones seems like a nice idea, but maybe with a toggle on process scope - if it should use default error handling.Stretching idea a bit - possibility to configure few automation error handlings, and possibility to define which one should be used for specified process if there is none defined on specific automation. (something similar to configurabe e-mails)]]></description>
  4119.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Maksymilian Stachowiak)]]></author>
  4120.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4874#msg-4927</guid>
  4121.                <pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2024 19:02:39 +0200</pubDate>
  4122.                            </item>
  4123.                    <item>
  4124.                
  4125.                <title><![CDATA[A small change to the validation message]]></title>
  4126.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4872#msg-4926</link>
  4127.                <description><![CDATA[Thats for sure a good one, end users seeing &#039;Error&#039; word in anything mostly pass it directly to maintainers, rather than reading the message :)]]></description>
  4128.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Maksymilian Stachowiak)]]></author>
  4129.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4872#msg-4926</guid>
  4130.                <pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2024 18:58:26 +0200</pubDate>
  4131.                            </item>
  4132.                    <item>
  4133.                
  4134.                <title><![CDATA[New Report model with independent SQL]]></title>
  4135.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4864#msg-4925</link>
  4136.                <description><![CDATA[It would be great to have it, especially for parent/child workflows, where we have to create nested subqueries in calculated columns.Although, i can see how handling custom SQL, will be a major pain on Webcon side - all those cases to which there should be a filter, grouping, aggregation functionalities - sounds hard to parse it and provide all those basic features on top of a query, which might be anything.Maybe some query builder with restrictions would help too, but query builder sounds like another big feature, and it could be worse to use than just SQL which is rather common knowledge after a year of working on the platform.]]></description>
  4137.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Maksymilian Stachowiak)]]></author>
  4138.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4864#msg-4925</guid>
  4139.                <pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2024 18:56:39 +0200</pubDate>
  4140.                            </item>
  4141.                    <item>
  4142.                
  4143.                <title><![CDATA[Add option to Create Automation from few acctions]]></title>
  4144.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4841#msg-4924</link>
  4145.                <description><![CDATA[Daniel&#039;s workaround is pretty nice, but I&#039;m up for that feature, I&#039;ve already few times tried to do it like Pawe describes, but i&#039;m alwasy brought back to reality really quick.Off-topicI&#039;m close to creating process automation almost every time too, navigating to specific action takes time, but lack of grouping of automations is what&#039;s holding me back ;)]]></description>
  4146.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Maksymilian Stachowiak)]]></author>
  4147.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4841#msg-4924</guid>
  4148.                <pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2024 18:50:01 +0200</pubDate>
  4149.                            </item>
  4150.                    <item>
  4151.                
  4152.                <title><![CDATA[Add Grups in Automation]]></title>
  4153.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4840#msg-4923</link>
  4154.                <description><![CDATA[It&#039;s a sencond user voice on this topic: https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4161I&#039;ll close previous one.]]></description>
  4155.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Maksymilian Stachowiak)]]></author>
  4156.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4840#msg-4923</guid>
  4157.                <pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2024 18:46:14 +0200</pubDate>
  4158.                            </item>
  4159.                    <item>
  4160.                
  4161.                <title><![CDATA[add BB Code tags or others in Forum]]></title>
  4162.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4839#msg-4922</link>
  4163.                <description><![CDATA[I&#039;m on the markdown team, but tbh, any styling syntax will do :)]]></description>
  4164.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Maksymilian Stachowiak)]]></author>
  4165.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4839#msg-4922</guid>
  4166.                <pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2024 18:43:07 +0200</pubDate>
  4167.                            </item>
  4168.                    <item>
  4169.                
  4170.                <title><![CDATA[Allow to overwrite existing Pdf when converting a Word document to Pdf]]></title>
  4171.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4917#msg-4917</link>
  4172.                <description><![CDATA[Generating a Word document, converting to a Pdf and deleting the Word afterwards, so the result is a Pdf only, are often used document generation steps.Unfortunately, it is not possible to overwrite an existing Pdf when converting a Word document to Pdf.So we usually have to delete the original, but I would prefer having an updated than a new Pdf.I would wish there was an option like the Mode in the &quot;Generate/Update a Word file&quot; to select whether to update an existing file or to create a new file.A feature even WEBCON could use in their licence order process when generating the order document more than once ;)]]></description>
  4173.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Markus Jenni)]]></author>
  4174.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4917#msg-4917</guid>
  4175.                <pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2024 12:47:51 +0200</pubDate>
  4176.                            </item>
  4177.                    <item>
  4178.                
  4179.                <title><![CDATA[Merge WORD / JPGs / PNGs and save as PDFs and few PDFs save as PDF file as native automation]]></title>
  4180.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4915#msg-4915</link>
  4181.                <description><![CDATA[options:1. Few words in 1 word [new] and then use word to pdf [done]2. Few graphics files in pdf [new]3. few PDFs in 1 PDF [new]]]></description>
  4182.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Paweł Tołoczko)]]></author>
  4183.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4915#msg-4915</guid>
  4184.                <pubDate>Sun, 19 May 2024 20:38:04 +0200</pubDate>
  4185.                            </item>
  4186.                    <item>
  4187.                
  4188.                <title><![CDATA[Configuring the SDK with Local Parameter]]></title>
  4189.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4909#msg-4909</link>
  4190.                <description><![CDATA[Hi, It would be useful if we could configure the SDK with values from local parameters. Sometimes we need to send a specific value, for example: a value from an item list or a calculated value, and it is easier and more efficient to save the value in local parameters from an automation rather than saving the value in a physical field. (Usually, these values are needed temporarily and it is not necessary to save them in a field).Another example : When we create a sdk type business rule and we want to use in a business rule with parameters. Thanks,Raluca]]></description>
  4191.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Raluca-Mirabela Lupu)]]></author>
  4192.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4909#msg-4909</guid>
  4193.                <pubDate>Thu, 16 May 2024 14:22:45 +0200</pubDate>
  4194.                            </item>
  4195.                    <item>
  4196.                
  4197.                <title><![CDATA[Collapsing Attachments by Category in the &#039;All Attachments&#039; Tab]]></title>
  4198.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4900#msg-4900</link>
  4199.                <description><![CDATA[Hi,It would be useful if we could collapse the attachments in the &#039;All attachments&#039; tab by categories.When we use the &#039;related attachments&#039; feature, there are many attachments, and it would be helpful if we could collapse all the attachments by categories or just the &#039;Current&#039; category.&quot;Thanks,Raluca]]></description>
  4200.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Raluca-Mirabela Lupu)]]></author>
  4201.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4900#msg-4900</guid>
  4202.                <pubDate>Mon, 13 May 2024 17:41:59 +0200</pubDate>
  4203.                            </item>
  4204.                    <item>
  4205.                
  4206.                <title><![CDATA[Addition of a global automation error handling configuration.]]></title>
  4207.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4874#msg-4899</link>
  4208.                <description><![CDATA[Let&#039;s see if there&#039;s more people needing it. Please vote by clicking &quot;thumbs up&quot; button.]]></description>
  4209.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Michal Rykiert)]]></author>
  4210.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4874#msg-4899</guid>
  4211.                <pubDate>Mon, 13 May 2024 16:26:25 +0200</pubDate>
  4212.                            </item>
  4213.                    <item>
  4214.                
  4215.                <title><![CDATA[A small change to the validation message]]></title>
  4216.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4872#msg-4898</link>
  4217.                <description><![CDATA[Certainly a good point. We&#039;ll take it under review.]]></description>
  4218.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Michal Rykiert)]]></author>
  4219.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4872#msg-4898</guid>
  4220.                <pubDate>Mon, 13 May 2024 16:25:37 +0200</pubDate>
  4221.                            </item>
  4222.                    <item>
  4223.                
  4224.                <title><![CDATA[Globally configurable archive view]]></title>
  4225.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4871#msg-4897</link>
  4226.                <description><![CDATA[Hey Daniel, for better understanding and priority evaluation, would you be able to say what percentage of your projects would require this enhancement? Have you ever used so-called search structures? We just need a bit more info to make an informed decision about what to do next.]]></description>
  4227.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Michal Rykiert)]]></author>
  4228.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4871#msg-4897</guid>
  4229.                <pubDate>Mon, 13 May 2024 16:25:05 +0200</pubDate>
  4230.                            </item>
  4231.                    <item>
  4232.                
  4233.                <title><![CDATA[Small change in timeuot configuration]]></title>
  4234.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4868#msg-4896</link>
  4235.                <description><![CDATA[Good news! It&#039;s already underway! You may expect it in v.2024 (although I cannot precisely commit to a particular build/hot refresh).]]></description>
  4236.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Michal Rykiert)]]></author>
  4237.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4868#msg-4896</guid>
  4238.                <pubDate>Mon, 13 May 2024 16:20:34 +0200</pubDate>
  4239.                            </item>
  4240.                    <item>
  4241.                
  4242.                <title><![CDATA[New Report model with independent SQL]]></title>
  4243.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4864#msg-4895</link>
  4244.                <description><![CDATA[It&#039;s a nice idea and definitely could enhance the reporting capabilities. However, despite it sounds fairly trivial, it&#039;s the exact opposite. It&#039;s a high-complexity functionality in terms of it being universal for every WEBCON client. With that said at this point the amount of workload needed for implementation and maintenance is not justifiable. We&#039;ll consider your idea for the future though.]]></description>
  4245.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Michal Rykiert)]]></author>
  4246.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4864#msg-4895</guid>
  4247.                <pubDate>Mon, 13 May 2024 16:20:08 +0200</pubDate>
  4248.                            </item>
  4249.                    <item>
  4250.                
  4251.                <title><![CDATA[Add option to Create Automation from few acctions]]></title>
  4252.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4841#msg-4894</link>
  4253.                <description><![CDATA[For all of you that need this functionality: please vote (click thumbs up at the top of the thread)! We&#039;d like to verify the demand for such functionality before moving any further.]]></description>
  4254.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Michal Rykiert)]]></author>
  4255.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4841#msg-4894</guid>
  4256.                <pubDate>Mon, 13 May 2024 16:16:02 +0200</pubDate>
  4257.                            </item>
  4258.                    <item>
  4259.                
  4260.                <title><![CDATA[Add Grups in Automation]]></title>
  4261.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4840#msg-4893</link>
  4262.                <description><![CDATA[For all of you that need this functionality: please vote (click thumbs up at the top of the thread)! We&#039;d like to verify the demand for such functionality before moving any further.]]></description>
  4263.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Michal Rykiert)]]></author>
  4264.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4840#msg-4893</guid>
  4265.                <pubDate>Mon, 13 May 2024 16:15:27 +0200</pubDate>
  4266.                            </item>
  4267.                    <item>
  4268.                
  4269.                <title><![CDATA[Default to connections to the current database]]></title>
  4270.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4752#msg-4892</link>
  4271.                <description><![CDATA[We&#039;ll test it out and provide updates. Stay tuned!]]></description>
  4272.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Michal Rykiert)]]></author>
  4273.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4752#msg-4892</guid>
  4274.                <pubDate>Mon, 13 May 2024 16:13:55 +0200</pubDate>
  4275.                            </item>
  4276.                    <item>
  4277.                
  4278.                <title><![CDATA[Link in configuration SQL Source Pickers]]></title>
  4279.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4747#msg-4891</link>
  4280.                <description><![CDATA[Hi Karol, we&#039;ll review your request in detail and see about the feasibility of including it into the development plans. It certainly sounds reasonable :).]]></description>
  4281.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Michal Rykiert)]]></author>
  4282.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4747#msg-4891</guid>
  4283.                <pubDate>Mon, 13 May 2024 16:11:30 +0200</pubDate>
  4284.                            </item>
  4285.                    <item>
  4286.                
  4287.                <title><![CDATA[Addition of a global automation error handling configuration.]]></title>
  4288.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4874#msg-4874</link>
  4289.                <description><![CDATA[Hi,From an administrator&#039;s point of view, it would be very helpful to add the ability to add global automation error handling. By this I mean the ability to enable such an option in the global configuration and, for example, add an email notification action about automation errors in the context of the whole system. In the email it would be possible to use process/step variables and specify the recipients.Such a configuration would work in addition to, and independently of, other error handling actions added individually per automation.In many cases, this would help to solve many problems before they are even noticed by end users, especially when actions are taken based on timeouts and other automated actions.Regards.]]></description>
  4290.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Karol Częczek)]]></author>
  4291.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4874#msg-4874</guid>
  4292.                <pubDate>Fri, 10 May 2024 14:51:27 +0200</pubDate>
  4293.                            </item>
  4294.                    <item>
  4295.                
  4296.                <title><![CDATA[A small change to the validation message]]></title>
  4297.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4872#msg-4872</link>
  4298.                <description><![CDATA[Hi,Currently we have &#039;Error occured&#039; in the header of the validation message.This often results in unnecessary logging of error reports from users who do not read the content, but only suggest that there is an error.Perhaps it would be a good idea to change the content of the header to something else that does not suggest an error, or allow it to be defined per action or globally?Regards.]]></description>
  4299.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Karol Częczek)]]></author>
  4300.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4872#msg-4872</guid>
  4301.                <pubDate>Fri, 10 May 2024 14:40:05 +0200</pubDate>
  4302.                            </item>
  4303.                    <item>
  4304.                
  4305.                <title><![CDATA[Globally configurable archive view]]></title>
  4306.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4871#msg-4871</link>
  4307.                <description><![CDATA[Hi,in my opinion it would be great, if the Archive view /explore/all could be configured on  a global level in Designer Studio. Maybe as a BPS internal view.This would allow us to define the system and global fields which are available for every process.For example I really would like to have the option to see/sort/filter the modified date and business entity which is currently not possible.I&#039;m writing this post right now because I just received again a &quot;bug&quot; description without a link or even an instance id. I have a good idea which process  the description is related to and in which timeframe the user worked with it but this doesn&#039;t help me because the date:- I may not change the report views- The &quot;recent activities&quot; is to short.The search is currently an alternative for my current case but there are other situation where  a configurable archive view would have helped me out.Best regards,Daniel]]></description>
  4308.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Daniel Krüger Cosmo Consult)]]></author>
  4309.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4871#msg-4871</guid>
  4310.                <pubDate>Fri, 10 May 2024 08:43:15 +0200</pubDate>
  4311.                            </item>
  4312.                    <item>
  4313.                
  4314.                <title><![CDATA[New Report model with independent SQL]]></title>
  4315.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4864#msg-4870</link>
  4316.                <description><![CDATA[It would be great to have such functionality!]]></description>
  4317.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Marcin Cudny)]]></author>
  4318.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4864#msg-4870</guid>
  4319.                <pubDate>Thu, 09 May 2024 12:54:50 +0200</pubDate>
  4320.                            </item>
  4321.                    <item>
  4322.                
  4323.                <title><![CDATA[Small change in timeuot configuration]]></title>
  4324.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4868#msg-4868</link>
  4325.                <description><![CDATA[Hi,The change consists of changing the default configuration that is created when the timeout action is added to a step.Default settings are interval 1 minute,number of repetitions: infinite number.If we forget to change this setting, it causes unnecessary and large number of versions, calls to action, etc. to be generated.It will be safer if the default option is :number of repetitions: 1Regards]]></description>
  4326.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Karol Częczek)]]></author>
  4327.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4868#msg-4868</guid>
  4328.                <pubDate>Wed, 08 May 2024 18:39:53 +0200</pubDate>
  4329.                            </item>
  4330.                    <item>
  4331.                
  4332.                <title><![CDATA[New Report model with independent SQL]]></title>
  4333.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4864#msg-4864</link>
  4334.                <description><![CDATA[Dear Webcon,are you planning to give us a new Report model (in the data presentation) that allows us to use our own/independent SQL?]]></description>
  4335.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Damian)]]></author>
  4336.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4864#msg-4864</guid>
  4337.                <pubDate>Wed, 08 May 2024 09:55:54 +0200</pubDate>
  4338.                            </item>
  4339.                    <item>
  4340.                
  4341.                <title><![CDATA[DOCUMENT TEMPLATE WITH QR CODE]]></title>
  4342.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4684#msg-4848</link>
  4343.                <description><![CDATA[Hi Micha,I assume that Katarzyna wants to add a QR code to the PDF, the same as the one generated on the new form in the bottom right corner. Is it possible?]]></description>
  4344.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Jacek Wojnar)]]></author>
  4345.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4684#msg-4848</guid>
  4346.                <pubDate>Sun, 05 May 2024 22:04:20 +0200</pubDate>
  4347.                            </item>
  4348.                    <item>
  4349.                
  4350.                <title><![CDATA[Add option to Create Automation from few acctions]]></title>
  4351.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4841#msg-4847</link>
  4352.                <description><![CDATA[Hi,in some version 2023 version the option was added to create a process automation. While this will &quot;copy&quot; all actions to the new process automation and replace the existing (path) automation by the process automation, this would surely help you. You could then close the process automation and remove the unnecessary actions.I form my part made it a habit to create one process automation for each path whenever there&#039;s a single action. The simple reason for this is, that I&#039;m to lazy to open the workflow dialog and navigate to the path actions. :)Best regards,Daniel]]></description>
  4353.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Daniel Krüger Cosmo Consult)]]></author>
  4354.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4841#msg-4847</guid>
  4355.                <pubDate>Sun, 05 May 2024 21:20:02 +0200</pubDate>
  4356.                            </item>
  4357.                    <item>
  4358.                
  4359.                <title><![CDATA[Add Grups in Automation]]></title>
  4360.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4840#msg-4846</link>
  4361.                <description><![CDATA[I agree, adding groups logic would come in handy. At the moment I&#039;m using a prefix in the name for grouping, but having real groups would be nice. :)]]></description>
  4362.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Daniel Krüger Cosmo Consult)]]></author>
  4363.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4840#msg-4846</guid>
  4364.                <pubDate>Sun, 05 May 2024 21:15:21 +0200</pubDate>
  4365.                            </item>
  4366.                    <item>
  4367.                
  4368.                <title><![CDATA[Add option to Create Automation from few acctions]]></title>
  4369.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4841#msg-4841</link>
  4370.                <description><![CDATA[I have Actions on path ...Generate WordConvert Word to PDFDelete attachment (docx)or more ... demands Appears during process  ...I would like to select 1.2.3 Actions (right click save as automation) .. not like now i can do 1 to 1 ....or ... I could do Automation with 1 operation then pick it in &quot;path&quot; and then edit it and add more actions ...Maybe I&#039;m wrong,but I do first actions,  then merge them into one [automation] not revers [do Automation then maybe or not add more actions to that automation ... or maybe I should think and do that way? ]  ...  When I create something I don&#039;t know it will be a grup or single Action ...]]></description>
  4371.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Paweł Tołoczko)]]></author>
  4372.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4841#msg-4841</guid>
  4373.                <pubDate>Thu, 02 May 2024 12:06:28 +0200</pubDate>
  4374.                            </item>
  4375.                    <item>
  4376.                
  4377.                <title><![CDATA[Add Grups in Automation]]></title>
  4378.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4840#msg-4840</link>
  4379.                <description><![CDATA[I don&#039;t know how is in Webcon 2023 or next 2024 but in 2022 I miss groups in Automationand then add groups in picking ...]]></description>
  4380.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Paweł Tołoczko)]]></author>
  4381.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4840#msg-4840</guid>
  4382.                <pubDate>Thu, 02 May 2024 11:49:07 +0200</pubDate>
  4383.                            </item>
  4384.                    <item>
  4385.                
  4386.                <title><![CDATA[add BB Code tags or others in Forum]]></title>
  4387.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4839#msg-4839</link>
  4388.                <description><![CDATA[Could be nice to add BB Code or other tags used in Forumor information what type of Tags can be used for me I would like to use:[code][/code] or [code=&quot;SQL&quot;][/code]using code wil help read code - see attachment[quote][/quote] or [quote=&quot;name&quot;] [/quote][B][/B] - bold[i][/i] - italicect.then is nice to use FF plugin or type tags ...]]></description>
  4389.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Paweł Tołoczko)]]></author>
  4390.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4839#msg-4839</guid>
  4391.                <pubDate>Thu, 02 May 2024 11:41:14 +0200</pubDate>
  4392.                            </item>
  4393.                    <item>
  4394.                
  4395.                <title><![CDATA[Company selection]]></title>
  4396.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4185#msg-4804</link>
  4397.                <description><![CDATA[Hey @Webcon,do you have any plans for this issue?]]></description>
  4398.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Damian)]]></author>
  4399.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4185#msg-4804</guid>
  4400.                <pubDate>Thu, 25 Apr 2024 11:56:24 +0200</pubDate>
  4401.                            </item>
  4402.                    <item>
  4403.                
  4404.                <title><![CDATA[Restoring old feature: Display constant group with context menu in rule]]></title>
  4405.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4530#msg-4776</link>
  4406.                <description><![CDATA[Indeed, it should work in further builds as well.]]></description>
  4407.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Michal Rykiert)]]></author>
  4408.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4530#msg-4776</guid>
  4409.                <pubDate>Wed, 17 Apr 2024 15:25:52 +0200</pubDate>
  4410.                            </item>
  4411.                    <item>
  4412.                
  4413.                <title><![CDATA[Restoring old feature: Display constant group with context menu in rule]]></title>
  4414.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4530#msg-4774</link>
  4415.                <description><![CDATA[Hi, I don&#039;t know when this was added/restored, but in version 2023.1.3.118 it&#039;s possible to right click a constant and select the other values from the group.Best regards,Daniel]]></description>
  4416.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Daniel Krüger Cosmo Consult)]]></author>
  4417.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4530#msg-4774</guid>
  4418.                <pubDate>Wed, 17 Apr 2024 13:07:34 +0200</pubDate>
  4419.                            </item>
  4420.                    <item>
  4421.                
  4422.                <title><![CDATA[[WORK-AROUND]: ERROR WITH STRING REPLACE in Version 2023.1.3.29 (Form Field -&gt; Style and behavior)]]></title>
  4423.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4498#msg-4762</link>
  4424.                <description><![CDATA[We&#039;ll take this case under review to ensure the consistency of behavior throughout the system.]]></description>
  4425.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Michal Rykiert)]]></author>
  4426.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4498#msg-4762</guid>
  4427.                <pubDate>Mon, 15 Apr 2024 11:52:48 +0200</pubDate>
  4428.                            </item>
  4429.                    <item>
  4430.                
  4431.                <title><![CDATA[Archiving issues-proposals]]></title>
  4432.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4573#msg-4759</link>
  4433.                <description><![CDATA[Hi Peter, archiving mechanisms were by design built this way to make them straightforward to use and simple to maintain in the product. At this point, we do not plan to extend their capabilities. On the other hand, since we can create multiple databases for processes (keep in mind we can store metadata and attachments separately), I think there should be sufficient options to manage storage efficiently. I&#039;m sure our infrastructure experts will be able to suggest solutions accordingly.]]></description>
  4434.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Michal Rykiert)]]></author>
  4435.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4573#msg-4759</guid>
  4436.                <pubDate>Fri, 12 Apr 2024 14:51:24 +0200</pubDate>
  4437.                            </item>
  4438.                    <item>
  4439.                
  4440.                <title><![CDATA[Default to connections to the current database]]></title>
  4441.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4752#msg-4752</link>
  4442.                <description><![CDATA[Hi,The idea is to always default to connections to the current database.Now if we have defined others, some others are often substituted by default, which is irritating :)Regards.]]></description>
  4443.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Karol Częczek)]]></author>
  4444.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4752#msg-4752</guid>
  4445.                <pubDate>Thu, 11 Apr 2024 15:55:04 +0200</pubDate>
  4446.                            </item>
  4447.                    <item>
  4448.                
  4449.                <title><![CDATA[Link in configuration SQL Source Pickers]]></title>
  4450.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4747#msg-4750</link>
  4451.                <description><![CDATA[Hi KarolThank you for bringing up this suggestion. Providing an easy way to provide a link to other systems (e.g. contacts in Dynamics 365) reminds me of the time when I used MatchPoint to configure applications in SharePoint.For lookup fields there was a way to provide an url with a placeholder that had been replaced by the Id.A similar approach could be used by WEBCON. Apart from the suggested placeholders (id, appid, dbid), it would be great to choose whether the preview is available or not.]]></description>
  4452.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Markus Jenni)]]></author>
  4453.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4747#msg-4750</guid>
  4454.                <pubDate>Thu, 11 Apr 2024 09:47:27 +0200</pubDate>
  4455.                            </item>
  4456.                    <item>
  4457.                
  4458.                <title><![CDATA[Link in configuration SQL Source Pickers]]></title>
  4459.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4747#msg-4747</link>
  4460.                <description><![CDATA[Hi,In my opinion, the biggest advantage of BPS data sources is the ability to link to a selected element.However, the disadvantage is much lower performance in advanced conditions, inability to join data, use union, and combine data from different content databases.By changing the source from BPS to SQL, users lose the functionality of the link. Of course, we can achieve this in a different way, but it is not consistent, for example, with other pickers using a BPS source.Would it be possible to introduce configuration options in the picker with an SQL source where we can map columns with ID, Appid, and dbid? Alternatively, a configuration where we return, for example, the entire constructed link (e.g., references to applications other than Webcon)?In environments where we use several content databases, this would be very useful and would introduce greater consistency for users.Regards.]]></description>
  4461.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Karol Częczek)]]></author>
  4462.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4747#msg-4747</guid>
  4463.                <pubDate>Wed, 10 Apr 2024 09:59:40 +0200</pubDate>
  4464.                            </item>
  4465.                    <item>
  4466.                
  4467.                <title><![CDATA[Dedicated additional CSS (branding) per Template]]></title>
  4468.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4700#msg-4741</link>
  4469.                <description><![CDATA[Hi Dominik,are you using nested css rules this could help structuring the css.Here&#039;s an example:https://daniels-notes.de/posts/2024/graphical-cues#colorized-database-names@MichaI hope the decision will be to add uploading/referencing a .css file per template. :)But we will see whether this wish will be fulfilled. :)Best regards,Daniel]]></description>
  4470.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Daniel Krüger Cosmo Consult)]]></author>
  4471.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4700#msg-4741</guid>
  4472.                <pubDate>Mon, 08 Apr 2024 12:04:13 +0200</pubDate>
  4473.                            </item>
  4474.                    <item>
  4475.                
  4476.                <title><![CDATA[Step Edit - Step Selector]]></title>
  4477.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4053#msg-4739</link>
  4478.                <description><![CDATA[Lovely! :)]]></description>
  4479.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Maksymilian Stachowiak)]]></author>
  4480.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4053#msg-4739</guid>
  4481.                <pubDate>Mon, 08 Apr 2024 08:16:40 +0200</pubDate>
  4482.                            </item>
  4483.                    <item>
  4484.                
  4485.                <title><![CDATA[Dedicated additional CSS (branding) per Template]]></title>
  4486.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4700#msg-4737</link>
  4487.                <description><![CDATA[Hi Micha, Great to hear. Meanwhile one of my Colleagues succeded to dedicate Global CSS (within BPS Studio) per template - using CSS selectors based on Template GUID from database. Summing up - we got Global CSS part for all templates (shared) and dedicated section for CSS per template - based on CSS template guid selectrors. Meanwhile we are excited to see revamp of User interface in WebCon BPS. And such CSS per template (exportable as well) would be great! BR, Dominik]]></description>
  4488.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Dominik Cholewinski)]]></author>
  4489.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4700#msg-4737</guid>
  4490.                <pubDate>Fri, 05 Apr 2024 13:04:50 +0200</pubDate>
  4491.                            </item>
  4492.                    <item>
  4493.                
  4494.                <title><![CDATA[WebCon BPS - Exchange/Teams integration - create meeting hosted online (Teams Meeting)]]></title>
  4495.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4707#msg-4736</link>
  4496.                <description><![CDATA[Hi Markus, Thank you for quick answer. Microsoft Graph is great tool, like you said. We are investigating the possibilities of such usage within one of our processes. We will have a look if such flag (isOnlineMeeting) will appear in WebCon BPS exchange integration standard action type :)It would be greate to have it out-of-the-box within exchange actions (and Microsoft Graph probably behind it). Best Regards, Dominik]]></description>
  4497.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Dominik Cholewinski)]]></author>
  4498.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4707#msg-4736</guid>
  4499.                <pubDate>Fri, 05 Apr 2024 13:01:44 +0200</pubDate>
  4500.                            </item>
  4501.                    <item>
  4502.                
  4503.                <title><![CDATA[WebCon BPS - Exchange/Teams integration - create meeting hosted online (Teams Meeting)]]></title>
  4504.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4707#msg-4734</link>
  4505.                <description><![CDATA[Hi DominikWe are creating calendar entries by using the MS Graph. When using the calendar API there is a property isOnlineMeeting that you can set to true.Here you find the documentation with an examplehttps://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/graph/outlook-calendar-online-meetings?tabs=http#example-create-and-make-meeting-available-as-an-online-meeting]]></description>
  4506.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Markus Jenni)]]></author>
  4507.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4707#msg-4734</guid>
  4508.                <pubDate>Fri, 05 Apr 2024 07:26:28 +0200</pubDate>
  4509.                            </item>
  4510.                    <item>
  4511.                
  4512.                <title><![CDATA[Request for Progressive Web Application (PWA) Support in WEBCON BPS]]></title>
  4513.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4692#msg-4733</link>
  4514.                <description><![CDATA[There must be a first time for everything. :P]]></description>
  4515.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Razvan Ogrezeanu - ENCORSA Romania)]]></author>
  4516.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4692#msg-4733</guid>
  4517.                <pubDate>Thu, 04 Apr 2024 15:35:00 +0200</pubDate>
  4518.                            </item>
  4519.                    <item>
  4520.                
  4521.                <title><![CDATA[Request for Progressive Web Application (PWA) Support in WEBCON BPS]]></title>
  4522.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4692#msg-4732</link>
  4523.                <description><![CDATA[Well, I think this may be the first time someone complained about a WEBCON representative reacting too quickly to the request :).]]></description>
  4524.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Michal Rykiert)]]></author>
  4525.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4692#msg-4732</guid>
  4526.                <pubDate>Thu, 04 Apr 2024 15:26:38 +0200</pubDate>
  4527.                            </item>
  4528.                    <item>
  4529.                
  4530.                <title><![CDATA[Request for Progressive Web Application (PWA) Support in WEBCON BPS]]></title>
  4531.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4692#msg-4731</link>
  4532.                <description><![CDATA[I think your understanding is correct and I do not negate the advantages of PWA that you listed. However, since WEBCON is already available on desktop and via mobile (through the web and native apps), and given our observations of how our clients use it and what they request, we cannot justify extending the capabilities towards PWA.]]></description>
  4533.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Michal Rykiert)]]></author>
  4534.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4692#msg-4731</guid>
  4535.                <pubDate>Thu, 04 Apr 2024 15:25:09 +0200</pubDate>
  4536.                            </item>
  4537.                    <item>
  4538.                
  4539.                <title><![CDATA[Request for Progressive Web Application (PWA) Support in WEBCON BPS]]></title>
  4540.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4692#msg-4730</link>
  4541.                <description><![CDATA[Also, it was categorized relatively fast as &quot;not now&quot;. I was at least expecting to have a conversation.]]></description>
  4542.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Razvan Ogrezeanu - ENCORSA Romania)]]></author>
  4543.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4692#msg-4730</guid>
  4544.                <pubDate>Thu, 04 Apr 2024 15:09:04 +0200</pubDate>
  4545.                            </item>
  4546.                    <item>
  4547.                
  4548.                <title><![CDATA[Request for Progressive Web Application (PWA) Support in WEBCON BPS]]></title>
  4549.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4692#msg-4729</link>
  4550.                <description><![CDATA[I might have a wrong understanding of what PWA apps are then. I am referring to the functionality where when you enter a certain URL with APP support it asks you to install the DESKTOP WEB APP. As you can see in the attached picture. It is a desktop app that also allows sending desktop notifications, but it still uses the website.Here is an example of the PWA functionality I am interested in: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vaZCRZbV7Ok&amp;ab_channel=LevisTech]]></description>
  4551.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Razvan Ogrezeanu - ENCORSA Romania)]]></author>
  4552.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4692#msg-4729</guid>
  4553.                <pubDate>Thu, 04 Apr 2024 15:06:39 +0200</pubDate>
  4554.                            </item>
  4555.                    <item>
  4556.                
  4557.                <title><![CDATA[Dedicated additional CSS (branding) per Template]]></title>
  4558.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4700#msg-4728</link>
  4559.                <description><![CDATA[Hi Dominik, we&#039;re currently working on a major revamp of the system&#039;s UI and UX. We&#039;re including your request into the analysis related to the revamp. FYI: we&#039;ve had several similar requests to yours submitted by others, so your request is well-timed :). Please note the revamp will affect almost all elements of the end-user interface and therefore it will take considerable time before results will be published. I&#039;m changing the status to &quot;under review&quot;.]]></description>
  4560.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Michal Rykiert)]]></author>
  4561.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4700#msg-4728</guid>
  4562.                <pubDate>Thu, 04 Apr 2024 14:49:47 +0200</pubDate>
  4563.                            </item>
  4564.                    <item>
  4565.                
  4566.                <title><![CDATA[Request for Progressive Web Application (PWA) Support in WEBCON BPS]]></title>
  4567.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4692#msg-4727</link>
  4568.                <description><![CDATA[Hi Razvan, the desktop interface is fully scalable and can be easily accessed via mobile device without a need for a native app (although my personal preference is to use our apps since they are meant to provide UX consistent to the operating system, i.e. Android, iOS). One thing that you mentioned and is not available with desktop interface is push notification feature. However, it&#039;s available via native apps. Given the above and other functionalities planned for implementation, we&#039;ve noted your request, but at this point we do not plan to further extend the system capabilities towards PWA.]]></description>
  4569.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Michal Rykiert)]]></author>
  4570.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4692#msg-4727</guid>
  4571.                <pubDate>Thu, 04 Apr 2024 14:43:47 +0200</pubDate>
  4572.                            </item>
  4573.                    <item>
  4574.                
  4575.                <title><![CDATA[DOCUMENT TEMPLATE WITH QR CODE]]></title>
  4576.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4684#msg-4726</link>
  4577.                <description><![CDATA[Hi Katarzyna,could you please outline the business scenario for the feature you&#039;re requesting? That would help us analyze it properly and provide you with a feedback.]]></description>
  4578.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Michal Rykiert)]]></author>
  4579.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4684#msg-4726</guid>
  4580.                <pubDate>Thu, 04 Apr 2024 14:36:14 +0200</pubDate>
  4581.                            </item>
  4582.                    <item>
  4583.                
  4584.                <title><![CDATA[AdminAPIlogs - lack of logs]]></title>
  4585.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4641#msg-4725</link>
  4586.                <description><![CDATA[Since the solution has been provided I&#039;m closing the thread.]]></description>
  4587.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Michal Rykiert)]]></author>
  4588.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4641#msg-4725</guid>
  4589.                <pubDate>Thu, 04 Apr 2024 14:35:08 +0200</pubDate>
  4590.                            </item>
  4591.                    <item>
  4592.                
  4593.                <title><![CDATA[Diagnostic mode: Log outgoing connections of data sources]]></title>
  4594.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4627#msg-4724</link>
  4595.                <description><![CDATA[Hi Daniel, we&#039;ll look into the feasibility of including such functionality into the system. I&#039;m changing the status to &quot;under review&quot;.]]></description>
  4596.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Michal Rykiert)]]></author>
  4597.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4627#msg-4724</guid>
  4598.                <pubDate>Thu, 04 Apr 2024 14:33:41 +0200</pubDate>
  4599.                            </item>
  4600.                    <item>
  4601.                
  4602.                <title><![CDATA[Column-Level Grouping on Main Forms]]></title>
  4603.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4619#msg-4723</link>
  4604.                <description><![CDATA[Hi,Thank youIts important to note for implementation in feature version.]]></description>
  4605.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Raluca-Mirabela Lupu)]]></author>
  4606.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4619#msg-4723</guid>
  4607.                <pubDate>Thu, 04 Apr 2024 13:06:24 +0200</pubDate>
  4608.                            </item>
  4609.                    <item>
  4610.                
  4611.                <title><![CDATA[Duplicate Superior source and Business entity  for connections]]></title>
  4612.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4625#msg-4722</link>
  4613.                <description><![CDATA[Hi Daniel, we understand your point. At the same time, it&#039;s not a trivial change from the system&#039;s architecture perspective. Therefore, we&#039;ll give it some time to see if there&#039;s more voices supporting your idea before we make a decision what to do next.]]></description>
  4614.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Michal Rykiert)]]></author>
  4615.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4625#msg-4722</guid>
  4616.                <pubDate>Thu, 04 Apr 2024 12:56:14 +0200</pubDate>
  4617.                            </item>
  4618.                    <item>
  4619.                
  4620.                <title><![CDATA[Column-Level Grouping on Main Forms]]></title>
  4621.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4619#msg-4721</link>
  4622.                <description><![CDATA[Raluca, it&#039;s a good idea, however it would require a major redesign. At this point, given the current interest in the requested feature, it&#039;s difficult to justify the cost of such modifications. We may re-visit this request in the future though.]]></description>
  4623.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Michal Rykiert)]]></author>
  4624.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4619#msg-4721</guid>
  4625.                <pubDate>Thu, 04 Apr 2024 12:54:03 +0200</pubDate>
  4626.                            </item>
  4627.                    <item>
  4628.                
  4629.                <title><![CDATA[Generate text file]]></title>
  4630.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4533#msg-4720</link>
  4631.                <description><![CDATA[Since the solution has been provided, I&#039;m changing the status to closed. However, be aware that in parallel we&#039;ll still evaluate a possibility of making it easier to achieve the desired result.]]></description>
  4632.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Michal Rykiert)]]></author>
  4633.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4533#msg-4720</guid>
  4634.                <pubDate>Thu, 04 Apr 2024 12:50:56 +0200</pubDate>
  4635.                            </item>
  4636.                    <item>
  4637.                
  4638.                <title><![CDATA[Disable parts of form rules]]></title>
  4639.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4531#msg-4719</link>
  4640.                <description><![CDATA[We like the idea, we need to evaluate it against universal application. I&#039;m changing the status to &quot;under review&quot;.]]></description>
  4641.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Michal Rykiert)]]></author>
  4642.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4531#msg-4719</guid>
  4643.                <pubDate>Thu, 04 Apr 2024 12:48:56 +0200</pubDate>
  4644.                            </item>
  4645.                    <item>
  4646.                
  4647.                <title><![CDATA[Restoring old feature: Display constant group with context menu in rule]]></title>
  4648.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4530#msg-4717</link>
  4649.                <description><![CDATA[We&#039;ve included your request into the backlog. I&#039;m changing the status accordingly.]]></description>
  4650.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Michal Rykiert)]]></author>
  4651.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4530#msg-4717</guid>
  4652.                <pubDate>Thu, 04 Apr 2024 12:46:21 +0200</pubDate>
  4653.                            </item>
  4654.                    <item>
  4655.                
  4656.                <title><![CDATA[Business rule: Is edit mode active]]></title>
  4657.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4529#msg-4716</link>
  4658.                <description><![CDATA[Hi Daniel, such option exist within the Form Rules. With that said, we&#039;ve put your feature request into the backlog. I&#039;m changing the status accordingly.]]></description>
  4659.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Michal Rykiert)]]></author>
  4660.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4529#msg-4716</guid>
  4661.                <pubDate>Thu, 04 Apr 2024 12:44:27 +0200</pubDate>
  4662.                            </item>
  4663.                    <item>
  4664.                
  4665.                <title><![CDATA[Attachment: Copy link / reference in rich text.]]></title>
  4666.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4528#msg-4715</link>
  4667.                <description><![CDATA[We&#039;re reviewing the request against the overall development plans. I&#039;m changing the status to &quot;under review&quot;.]]></description>
  4668.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Michal Rykiert)]]></author>
  4669.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4528#msg-4715</guid>
  4670.                <pubDate>Thu, 04 Apr 2024 12:42:25 +0200</pubDate>
  4671.                            </item>
  4672.                    <item>
  4673.                
  4674.                <title><![CDATA[Designer Studio eficiency modyfications  - child window of child window ect ...]]></title>
  4675.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4518#msg-4714</link>
  4676.                <description><![CDATA[I&#039;m changing the status to &quot;under review&quot; as per point 6 and 7.]]></description>
  4677.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Michal Rykiert)]]></author>
  4678.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4518#msg-4714</guid>
  4679.                <pubDate>Thu, 04 Apr 2024 12:41:12 +0200</pubDate>
  4680.                            </item>
  4681.                    <item>
  4682.                
  4683.                <title><![CDATA[WebCon BPS - Exchange/Teams integration - create meeting hosted online (Teams Meeting)]]></title>
  4684.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4707#msg-4707</link>
  4685.                <description><![CDATA[Hi, Is there a possibility to configure exchange integration actions - create/update calendar event so it creates Teams meeting?Or only option is Microsoft Graph? Or some powershell? Do you have any examples of that?Best Regards, Dominik]]></description>
  4686.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Dominik Cholewinski)]]></author>
  4687.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4707#msg-4707</guid>
  4688.                <pubDate>Thu, 04 Apr 2024 09:14:50 +0200</pubDate>
  4689.                            </item>
  4690.                    <item>
  4691.                
  4692.                <title><![CDATA[Dedicated additional CSS (branding) per Template]]></title>
  4693.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4700#msg-4700</link>
  4694.                <description><![CDATA[Hello, I would like to make a suggestion or find solution for branding case. We got customized White Template (as a copy) + we customized coloring of navigation sections by global CSS (setup in System settings in BPS Studio). Result is visible in the attached screenshots.Such coloring works fine for light templates, but not for dark one. And I thought that Additional CSS  per template would be a nice feature in the product. And as workaround for now - could you please give me a hint how I can dedicate additional CSS per template, e.g. per CSS selectors?Best Regards, Dominik]]></description>
  4695.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Dominik Cholewinski)]]></author>
  4696.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4700#msg-4700</guid>
  4697.                <pubDate>Wed, 03 Apr 2024 13:22:13 +0200</pubDate>
  4698.                            </item>
  4699.                    <item>
  4700.                
  4701.                <title><![CDATA[Always display Download all attachments button]]></title>
  4702.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/3840#msg-4696</link>
  4703.                <description><![CDATA[Hi Daniel,agreed! We&#039;ll change the system behavior as you suggested. Stay tuned for more details.]]></description>
  4704.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Michal Rykiert)]]></author>
  4705.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/3840#msg-4696</guid>
  4706.                <pubDate>Tue, 02 Apr 2024 16:33:58 +0200</pubDate>
  4707.                            </item>
  4708.                    <item>
  4709.                
  4710.                <title><![CDATA[Step Edit - Step Selector]]></title>
  4711.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4053#msg-4695</link>
  4712.                <description><![CDATA[Hi Maksymilian,we&#039;ll do it :). Stay tuned for more details!]]></description>
  4713.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Michal Rykiert)]]></author>
  4714.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4053#msg-4695</guid>
  4715.                <pubDate>Tue, 02 Apr 2024 16:29:59 +0200</pubDate>
  4716.                            </item>
  4717.                    <item>
  4718.                
  4719.                <title><![CDATA[The default name for the new automation]]></title>
  4720.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4035#msg-4694</link>
  4721.                <description><![CDATA[Hi Karol, I&#039;m happy to report that the functionality you requested will be implemented in the system. Stay tuned for more details :).]]></description>
  4722.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Michal Rykiert)]]></author>
  4723.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4035#msg-4694</guid>
  4724.                <pubDate>Tue, 02 Apr 2024 16:28:48 +0200</pubDate>
  4725.                            </item>
  4726.                    <item>
  4727.                
  4728.                <title><![CDATA[Request for Progressive Web Application (PWA) Support in WEBCON BPS]]></title>
  4729.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4692#msg-4692</link>
  4730.                <description><![CDATA[While I greatly appreciate the functionalities and flexibility provided by the WEBCON BPS mobile application, many of us find ourselves predominantly using WEBCON BPS on desktop computers due to the nature of our workflows and the complex tasks we perform. However, the mobile application&#039;s interface and functionalities do not always translate seamlessly to desktop usage, where the majority of our work occurs.The addition of PWA support would bridge this gap significantly by offering a number of compelling advantages:1. Seamless Integration and Uniform Experience: PWAs provide a consistent and efficient user experience that matches the desktop environment, offering the responsiveness and feel of a native application without the need for a separate mobile app.2. Push Notifications: The integration of push notifications can improve our task management and alert systems, providing timely updates directly through the web application.3. No Installation Required: PWAs do not require users to install software from an app store, making it easier for our team to access and use WEBCON BPS without the hurdles of traditional application deployment.I believe that implementing PWA functionality into WEBCON BPS will not only enhance the desktop user experience but also align with the evolving needs of businesses seeking more agile and efficient digital solutions. It acknowledges the reality that while mobile applications serve their purpose, the desktop experience remains paramount for many professional settings, including ours.I kindly ask the WEBCON development team to consider this request to incorporate PWA capabilities into WEBCON BPS, thereby enriching the toolset available to us and further solidifying WEBCON&#039;s position as a forward-thinking leader in business process solutions.]]></description>
  4731.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Razvan Ogrezeanu - ENCORSA Romania)]]></author>
  4732.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4692#msg-4692</guid>
  4733.                <pubDate>Tue, 02 Apr 2024 08:23:10 +0200</pubDate>
  4734.                            </item>
  4735.                    <item>
  4736.                
  4737.                <title><![CDATA[Calendar report coloring]]></title>
  4738.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/3365#msg-4691</link>
  4739.                <description><![CDATA[This is a great news! :)]]></description>
  4740.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Michał Ludwiczak)]]></author>
  4741.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/3365#msg-4691</guid>
  4742.                <pubDate>Fri, 29 Mar 2024 19:14:41 +0100</pubDate>
  4743.                            </item>
  4744.                    <item>
  4745.                
  4746.                <title><![CDATA[Add possibility to view members of the WebCon BPS Group to the users without Admin/Group Owner Permissions]]></title>
  4747.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/3512#msg-4688</link>
  4748.                <description><![CDATA[Hi Micha, Thank you for good news before Easter :) Fruitful, Calm, Happy Easter to you and WHOLE WebCon Family :)Best Regards, Dominik]]></description>
  4749.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Dominik Cholewinski)]]></author>
  4750.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/3512#msg-4688</guid>
  4751.                <pubDate>Thu, 28 Mar 2024 16:08:35 +0100</pubDate>
  4752.                            </item>
  4753.                    <item>
  4754.                
  4755.                <title><![CDATA[Add possibility to view members of the WebCon BPS Group to the users without Admin/Group Owner Permissions]]></title>
  4756.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/3512#msg-4686</link>
  4757.                <description><![CDATA[Hi Dominik, I have good news and...an information :).The good news is that the feature with the links to the BPS Groups will be done in v. 2024 R1, so fairly soon :).As for the functionality for viewing group members, we do not say no. However, it would be nice to see if more people and organizations need it before we decide what to do with it. So make sure to gather some thumbs for your post :).]]></description>
  4758.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Michal Rykiert)]]></author>
  4759.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/3512#msg-4686</guid>
  4760.                <pubDate>Thu, 28 Mar 2024 11:19:29 +0100</pubDate>
  4761.                            </item>
  4762.                    <item>
  4763.                
  4764.                <title><![CDATA[DOCUMENT TEMPLATE WITH QR CODE]]></title>
  4765.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4684#msg-4684</link>
  4766.                <description><![CDATA[In the 2023 version, we have the ability to generate QR codes for each element. The mobile application has introduced a search by QR codes, which is very useful. I miss the ability to add QR codes to document prints from Webcon. It could look similar to adding barcodes in document templates. Thanks to this, a person who receives a printed document could easily find the right element in the Webcon system by scanning the QR code.]]></description>
  4767.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Katarzyna)]]></author>
  4768.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4684#msg-4684</guid>
  4769.                <pubDate>Wed, 27 Mar 2024 13:14:54 +0100</pubDate>
  4770.                            </item>
  4771.                    <item>
  4772.                
  4773.                <title><![CDATA[Calendar report coloring]]></title>
  4774.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/3365#msg-4681</link>
  4775.                <description><![CDATA[Hi Micha, I&#039;m happy to say that your request has been heard and will be embedded into the platform. We already have a project of enhancement to the calendar report, including coloring. The precise date of implementation is to be determined, so stay tuned :).]]></description>
  4776.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Michal Rykiert)]]></author>
  4777.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/3365#msg-4681</guid>
  4778.                <pubDate>Tue, 26 Mar 2024 16:07:06 +0100</pubDate>
  4779.                            </item>
  4780.                    <item>
  4781.                
  4782.                <title><![CDATA[Archiving issues-proposals]]></title>
  4783.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4573#msg-4661</link>
  4784.                <description><![CDATA[Hi Michal, Thanks for your respond!I understand concept of archiving in Webcon, I know that interaction is not possible.What I am saying (point 2.) that after archiving, we loose read only privileges which were granted on instance level based on an attribute. This way we cannot control which archived instances should be visible for a group/user.The other thing I mentioned (point 1.) , that today we do not have any control over form field visibility in archived instances, which imho would be useful.Yes, we had the idea to keep these intances in Archived step or move to an other simpler workflow, but this way we would loose the main purpose to free up some storage space in active content db.  So a solution for at least to our privilege problem with archiving would be appreciated!]]></description>
  4785.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (SIMON Péter)]]></author>
  4786.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4573#msg-4661</guid>
  4787.                <pubDate>Sat, 23 Mar 2024 21:39:43 +0100</pubDate>
  4788.                            </item>
  4789.                    <item>
  4790.                
  4791.                <title><![CDATA[AdminAPIlogs - lack of logs]]></title>
  4792.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4641#msg-4644</link>
  4793.                <description><![CDATA[Hi, I can confirm it, with some release the database in which the log is stored was switched from content/process database to config database.At least this was the case when I put together this post with version 2023.1.2.44.https://daniels-notes.de/posts/2023/where-is-my-log#adminapilogs-cpBest regards,Daniel]]></description>
  4794.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Daniel Krüger Cosmo Consult)]]></author>
  4795.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4641#msg-4644</guid>
  4796.                <pubDate>Thu, 21 Mar 2024 20:40:25 +0100</pubDate>
  4797.                            </item>
  4798.                    <item>
  4799.                
  4800.                <title><![CDATA[AdminAPIlogs - lack of logs]]></title>
  4801.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4641#msg-4642</link>
  4802.                <description><![CDATA[Hi,Do you check on Config base or Content base?All data logs in table AdminAPILogs (as far i know) in version 2023 are in Config base.]]></description>
  4803.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Przemysław Prostko)]]></author>
  4804.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4641#msg-4642</guid>
  4805.                <pubDate>Thu, 21 Mar 2024 12:40:30 +0100</pubDate>
  4806.                            </item>
  4807.                    <item>
  4808.                
  4809.                <title><![CDATA[AdminAPIlogs - lack of logs]]></title>
  4810.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4641#msg-4641</link>
  4811.                <description><![CDATA[Hello everyone, I have a question.We are migrating Webcon to version 2023. I checked the table [dbo].[AdminAPILogs], and since the last version in 2022, there hasn&#039;t been a single log in this table. Has anything changed in the new versions, and do I need to turn on logging into this table somewhere?I have been looking for an answer on the Webcon website and Google, but I haven&#039;t found anything]]></description>
  4812.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Michal Leszczynski Raben)]]></author>
  4813.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4641#msg-4641</guid>
  4814.                <pubDate>Thu, 21 Mar 2024 12:13:47 +0100</pubDate>
  4815.                            </item>
  4816.                    <item>
  4817.                
  4818.                <title><![CDATA[Column-Level Grouping on Main Forms]]></title>
  4819.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4619#msg-4640</link>
  4820.                <description><![CDATA[It&#039;s also counter intuitive to set it per step basis - i&#039;ve had troubles finding that this option even exists, i&#039;m up for changes :)]]></description>
  4821.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Maksymilian Stachowiak)]]></author>
  4822.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4619#msg-4640</guid>
  4823.                <pubDate>Thu, 21 Mar 2024 11:59:17 +0100</pubDate>
  4824.                            </item>
  4825.                    <item>
  4826.                
  4827.                <title><![CDATA[Diagnostic mode: Log outgoing connections of data sources]]></title>
  4828.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4627#msg-4627</link>
  4829.                <description><![CDATA[Hi,I&#039;m sorry, if this a duplicate, but I&#039;m not sure if I added it already or maybe someone else.If selecting a value  of a choose field from a data source throws and this causes an error, it&#039;s not easily possible to see the actual &quot;request&quot; which was used to get the data.There are ways around this:- In case of SQL and you have access to the server you could activate the SQL profiler- In case of rest/soap requests you could add an http interceptor which can be used as a proxy. If you don&#039;t have access to the server or the request uses OAuth authentication you are out of luck. Therefore it would make our live easier, if the would see the final request which is send to the server in the saved diagnostic session. This would be similar to the &quot;Invoke rest web service&quot; action log displayed in admin mode.Now I&#039;m going back to see what the problem is in my case.Best regards,Daniel]]></description>
  4830.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Daniel Krüger Cosmo Consult)]]></author>
  4831.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4627#msg-4627</guid>
  4832.                <pubDate>Tue, 19 Mar 2024 21:31:39 +0100</pubDate>
  4833.                            </item>
  4834.                    <item>
  4835.                
  4836.                <title><![CDATA[Global HTML fields]]></title>
  4837.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4407#msg-4626</link>
  4838.                <description><![CDATA[Hi Michal,let&#039;s assume you are using HTML fields to introduce some functionality like a bread crumb. Then you will want to have this in all  workflows. If there&#039;s a change to it, let&#039;s assume somehow the DOM changed with a new release, you will need to touch each field in all processes. But maybe these kind of options the HTML fields offer is used by a small group. Perhaps someone else can add the results of the following script:/****** Script for SelectTopNRows command from SSMS  ******/SELECT WFCON_Prompt, Count(*) as [Count]FROM [dbo].[WFConfigurations] join DicWFFieldTypes on WFCON_FieldTypeID = TypeID and ObjectName = &#039;HTML&#039;group by WFCON_Promptorder by [Count] descThis will group the html fields by name and count them. If a field is created again and again with the same name, it should come up at the top.Best regards,Daniel]]></description>
  4839.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Daniel Krüger Cosmo Consult)]]></author>
  4840.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4407#msg-4626</guid>
  4841.                <pubDate>Tue, 19 Mar 2024 21:03:53 +0100</pubDate>
  4842.                            </item>
  4843.                    <item>
  4844.                
  4845.                <title><![CDATA[Duplicate Superior source and Business entity  for connections]]></title>
  4846.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4625#msg-4625</link>
  4847.                <description><![CDATA[Hi, we have the option to create &quot;child sources&quot;, by defining a superior source and a  business entity. This way we can use different connections.https://docs.webcon.com/docs/2023R3/Studio/ConnectionsAndDataSource/DataSources/DataSource_RestWebService#3-superior-sourceThis way we can use different connection for the &quot;same&quot; data source.This works fine for reading data. When we want to write data so, it&#039;s not so easy any more. For example the &quot;invoke REST Web service&quot; will allow selecting one connection. This connection will be used without the context of the  current business entity.The only option which would work in all cases would be to use if/switch operator for each business entity and  &quot;duplicate&quot; the action. At least I haven&#039;t found an alternative, if the connection has not only a different URL part but uses different credentials.Therefore it would be great if we could also create &quot;child&quot; connection which utilize the same concept as it&#039;s applied to the business entities. Best regards,Daniel]]></description>
  4848.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Daniel Krüger Cosmo Consult)]]></author>
  4849.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4625#msg-4625</guid>
  4850.                <pubDate>Tue, 19 Mar 2024 20:30:42 +0100</pubDate>
  4851.                            </item>
  4852.                    <item>
  4853.                
  4854.                <title><![CDATA[Column-Level Grouping on Main Forms]]></title>
  4855.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4619#msg-4619</link>
  4856.                <description><![CDATA[It would be useful to be able to group the data in the itemlist at the column level and on the main form. Currently, we can group at the level of each step, but sometimes when we have many steps, it would be more useful to be able to set it just on the main form.Thanks,Raluca]]></description>
  4857.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Raluca-Mirabela Lupu)]]></author>
  4858.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4619#msg-4619</guid>
  4859.                <pubDate>Tue, 19 Mar 2024 08:51:11 +0100</pubDate>
  4860.                            </item>
  4861.                    <item>
  4862.                
  4863.                <title><![CDATA[BPS Groups inside BPS Grops]]></title>
  4864.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4366#msg-4617</link>
  4865.                <description><![CDATA[Just for clarity: I meant we understood where you came from and gave it a proper thought.]]></description>
  4866.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Michal Rykiert)]]></author>
  4867.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4366#msg-4617</guid>
  4868.                <pubDate>Mon, 18 Mar 2024 16:00:55 +0100</pubDate>
  4869.                            </item>
  4870.                    <item>
  4871.                
  4872.                <title><![CDATA[BPS Groups inside BPS Grops]]></title>
  4873.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4366#msg-4616</link>
  4874.                <description><![CDATA[]]></description>
  4875.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Razvan Ogrezeanu - ENCORSA Romania)]]></author>
  4876.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4366#msg-4616</guid>
  4877.                <pubDate>Mon, 18 Mar 2024 14:59:05 +0100</pubDate>
  4878.                            </item>
  4879.                    <item>
  4880.                
  4881.                <title><![CDATA[BPS Groups inside BPS Grops]]></title>
  4882.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4366#msg-4614</link>
  4883.                <description><![CDATA[Razvan, your voice has been heard. Once I have any updates, I&#039;ll let you know.]]></description>
  4884.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Michal Rykiert)]]></author>
  4885.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4366#msg-4614</guid>
  4886.                <pubDate>Mon, 18 Mar 2024 13:50:46 +0100</pubDate>
  4887.                            </item>
  4888.                    <item>
  4889.                
  4890.                <title><![CDATA[Add parameters to HTML widgets in dashboards]]></title>
  4891.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4394#msg-4613</link>
  4892.                <description><![CDATA[A small correction, the feature is currently under review. I marked the post accordingly.]]></description>
  4893.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Michal Rykiert)]]></author>
  4894.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4394#msg-4613</guid>
  4895.                <pubDate>Mon, 18 Mar 2024 13:46:26 +0100</pubDate>
  4896.                            </item>
  4897.                    <item>
  4898.                
  4899.                <title><![CDATA[Character counting]]></title>
  4900.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4402#msg-4612</link>
  4901.                <description><![CDATA[Since the case is resolved, I&#039;m closing the thread :).]]></description>
  4902.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Michal Rykiert)]]></author>
  4903.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4402#msg-4612</guid>
  4904.                <pubDate>Mon, 18 Mar 2024 13:43:09 +0100</pubDate>
  4905.                            </item>
  4906.                    <item>
  4907.                
  4908.                <title><![CDATA[Archiving issues-proposals]]></title>
  4909.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4573#msg-4611</link>
  4910.                <description><![CDATA[Hello Peter,the main idea behind the archiving mechanisms is to help efficiently manage instances that are no longer actively used but need to be stored. For instance, in many countries, legal documents need to be kept despite the fact they are no longer in use. Archiving mechanisms also help with keeping the main content database fairly lean. Therefore, by design, once you archive elements, it&#039;s impossible to interact with them as you&#039;d normally do and we plan to keep it that way (the ability to tinker with archived data is undesirable by most organizations). With that said, I see 2 possible solutions to the cases you brought up:1. [If you do not need to move workflow instances from your main content database] Make sure your process ends with a final &quot;Archive&quot; step. Then you can freely assign field visibility and permissions.2. [If you do need to move instances from your main content database] Move the workflow instances to the separate process that would be used specifically for archiving purposes with elevated visibility and permissions options. I also encourage you to contact our experts via https://support.webcon.com as they might have more ideas and will be able to provide you with more detailed solutions.]]></description>
  4911.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Michal Rykiert)]]></author>
  4912.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4573#msg-4611</guid>
  4913.                <pubDate>Mon, 18 Mar 2024 13:37:13 +0100</pubDate>
  4914.                            </item>
  4915.                    <item>
  4916.                
  4917.                <title><![CDATA[Designer Studio eficiency modyfications  - child window of child window ect ...]]></title>
  4918.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4518#msg-4602</link>
  4919.                <description><![CDATA[Hi Pawe,so many ideas at once :). Let me address them in order:Ad.1 &quot;One configuration window at a time&quot; approach was our concious decision from the very beginning. For many, such solution helps with getting things done in order, without confusion and potential double/unwanted inputs (keep in mind the &quot;save&quot; button in Studio, saves all changes made in the process). Although I understand why advanced users would like to have a possibility to work with multiple configuration windows, in the foreseeble future we plan to stick to the original plan. Ad.2 I see your point. If you look at it from a different angle, the current configuration settings enforce certain level of unification of all diagrams, which makes them more universal for every user. Therefore, it makes them easier to comprehend right away. I&#039;m not saying &quot;no&quot;, but there are always to sides of a coin :).Ad.3  I&#039;m not sure if I understand your case. You can see how given attribute (form field) can be visible in every step from the field matrix. This is the main &quot;control panel&quot; responsible for behavior of fields in every step of the workflow and we definitely plan to keep it. Ad.4 Good! :)Ad.5 I&#039;ve already responded to the thread you mention, please have a look there :).Ad.6. I see. No promises, but I&#039;ll bring it up when there&#039;s a discussion about export mechanism. Ad.7. We&#039;re evaluating it. Stay tuned :).]]></description>
  4920.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Michal Rykiert)]]></author>
  4921.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4518#msg-4602</guid>
  4922.                <pubDate>Fri, 15 Mar 2024 11:31:03 +0100</pubDate>
  4923.                            </item>
  4924.                    <item>
  4925.                
  4926.                <title><![CDATA[Export Hotfix]]></title>
  4927.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4503#msg-4601</link>
  4928.                <description><![CDATA[Automated export-import will solve part of the problem, but maybe it will be good enough to start thinking in terms of roll forward, instead of roll back, then cherrypicking hotfixes shouldn&#039;t be necessary.Introducing some feature flags to control what users will see, and connecting this with thoughtful exporting, i can see some possibilities.Thanks for response :)]]></description>
  4929.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Maksymilian Stachowiak)]]></author>
  4930.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4503#msg-4601</guid>
  4931.                <pubDate>Fri, 15 Mar 2024 11:26:28 +0100</pubDate>
  4932.                            </item>
  4933.                    <item>
  4934.                
  4935.                <title><![CDATA[Export Hotfix]]></title>
  4936.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4503#msg-4599</link>
  4937.                <description><![CDATA[Hi Maksymilian, I see your point and we had a discussion about your request. At this point, the scope of required changes in the code is too extensive compared to the benfits we see for all clients. Currently we focus on making automated imports and further improvements, to make sure DEV-TEST-PROD migrations are as smooth as possible. Given the fact we are able to export-import workflows, forms, rules, data sources, reports, dashboards, etc. at once (which many other systems on the market do not offer), it&#039;s a lot to work with already :).Thanks for the suggestion though, we might revisit it at later stages.]]></description>
  4938.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Michal Rykiert)]]></author>
  4939.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4503#msg-4599</guid>
  4940.                <pubDate>Fri, 15 Mar 2024 11:08:16 +0100</pubDate>
  4941.                            </item>
  4942.                    <item>
  4943.                
  4944.                <title><![CDATA[Postponed tasks]]></title>
  4945.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4469#msg-4598</link>
  4946.                <description><![CDATA[At this point the scope of the required work is too extensive compared to the benefits we see. Thanks for the suggestion though!]]></description>
  4947.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Michal Rykiert)]]></author>
  4948.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4469#msg-4598</guid>
  4949.                <pubDate>Fri, 15 Mar 2024 10:58:30 +0100</pubDate>
  4950.                            </item>
  4951.                    <item>
  4952.                
  4953.                <title><![CDATA[Global HTML fields]]></title>
  4954.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4407#msg-4597</link>
  4955.                <description><![CDATA[Hi Daniel, could you please outline use case/use cases for the global HTML field? It would help us evaluating it internally.]]></description>
  4956.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Michal Rykiert)]]></author>
  4957.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4407#msg-4597</guid>
  4958.                <pubDate>Fri, 15 Mar 2024 10:51:56 +0100</pubDate>
  4959.                            </item>
  4960.                    <item>
  4961.                
  4962.                <title><![CDATA[Mouse over of choose fields to display the id]]></title>
  4963.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4370#msg-4596</link>
  4964.                <description><![CDATA[We plan to introduce a functionality to display the ID in the admin mode.I cannot commit towards when exactly at this point, so stay tuned :).]]></description>
  4965.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Michal Rykiert)]]></author>
  4966.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4370#msg-4596</guid>
  4967.                <pubDate>Fri, 15 Mar 2024 10:50:02 +0100</pubDate>
  4968.                            </item>
  4969.                    <item>
  4970.                
  4971.                <title><![CDATA[BPS Groups inside BPS Grops]]></title>
  4972.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4366#msg-4595</link>
  4973.                <description><![CDATA[Then, you can also add functionality to the user profile that shows which groups a person or group is a member of.If not, a great workaround would be being able to clone groups with all the members inside and also being able to add users to the group from the user page, not only from the group page. This would make life much easier for customers with over 20 users and 5 apps.]]></description>
  4974.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Razvan Ogrezeanu - ENCORSA Romania)]]></author>
  4975.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4366#msg-4595</guid>
  4976.                <pubDate>Fri, 15 Mar 2024 10:48:45 +0100</pubDate>
  4977.                            </item>
  4978.                    <item>
  4979.                
  4980.                <title><![CDATA[Deactivation of the company]]></title>
  4981.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4369#msg-4594</link>
  4982.                <description><![CDATA[We had an internal discussion about the case you brought up. The consensus is that we&#039;ll introduce a behavior that would make deactivated buinsess entities disappear from the tab menu by default. At the same time, it will be possible to display all business entities whenever necessary.We don&#039;t have an exact date for implementation yet, so stay tuned :).]]></description>
  4983.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Michal Rykiert)]]></author>
  4984.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4369#msg-4594</guid>
  4985.                <pubDate>Fri, 15 Mar 2024 10:47:45 +0100</pubDate>
  4986.                            </item>
  4987.                    <item>
  4988.                
  4989.                <title><![CDATA[BPS Groups inside BPS Grops]]></title>
  4990.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4366#msg-4593</link>
  4991.                <description><![CDATA[Let me provide a voice from the other side of this topic. The challenge with nested groups is the transparency. The more levels of nesting you have, the harder it is to say which users actually belong to the certain group. Of course if you&#039;re a responsible admin, you&#039;ll manage it properly. However, it&#039;s one of those things that can get messy quick without proper, structured approach. Please note you may also use AD groups in the process configuration whenever necessary. For now we don&#039;t plan on extending the BPS groups with nesting. However, if this request keeps repeating (or is highly upvoted), we may re-visit it in the future.]]></description>
  4992.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Michal Rykiert)]]></author>
  4993.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4366#msg-4593</guid>
  4994.                <pubDate>Fri, 15 Mar 2024 10:43:05 +0100</pubDate>
  4995.                            </item>
  4996.                    <item>
  4997.                
  4998.                <title><![CDATA[Archiving issues-proposals]]></title>
  4999.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4573#msg-4573</link>
  5000.                <description><![CDATA[Hello Everyone, We have some challenges with Archiving in Webcon BPS, so we have some ideas to improve. 1. Issue: you cannot setup field availibility for archived instancesProposal: there could be a 3rd form editor like standard/mobile form have. Or/and additional field matrix setting controlling visibility on archive form.2. Issue: Instance level privileges are not inherited to archived instances. It is a problem as we have readonly permissions granted based on instance attribute.  (use case: Incoming invoice visibility for users depends on invoice types.)Proposal: in archiving action it would be nice to have a parameter to control permission inheritance. What do you think about it?Thanks!]]></description>
  5001.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (SIMON Péter)]]></author>
  5002.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4573#msg-4573</guid>
  5003.                <pubDate>Wed, 13 Mar 2024 15:17:45 +0100</pubDate>
  5004.                            </item>
  5005.                    <item>
  5006.                
  5007.                <title><![CDATA[[Solved] Override returnurl for path.]]></title>
  5008.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4567#msg-4571</link>
  5009.                <description><![CDATA[Thanks Daniel, I somehow didn&#039;t had a chance to use that action yet, and totally forgot about it ]]></description>
  5010.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Maksymilian Stachowiak)]]></author>
  5011.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4567#msg-4571</guid>
  5012.                <pubDate>Wed, 13 Mar 2024 14:50:44 +0100</pubDate>
  5013.                            </item>
  5014.                    <item>
  5015.                
  5016.                <title><![CDATA[[WORK-AROUND]: ERROR WITH STRING REPLACE in Version 2023.1.3.29 (Form Field -&gt; Style and behavior)]]></title>
  5017.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4498#msg-4570</link>
  5018.                <description><![CDATA[We have just been using this unintended feature to conditionally execute a form rule. :)]]></description>
  5019.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Daniel Krüger Cosmo Consult)]]></author>
  5020.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4498#msg-4570</guid>
  5021.                <pubDate>Wed, 13 Mar 2024 14:50:22 +0100</pubDate>
  5022.                            </item>
  5023.                    <item>
  5024.                
  5025.                <title><![CDATA[[Solved] Override returnurl for path.]]></title>
  5026.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4567#msg-4568</link>
  5027.                <description><![CDATA[Hi Maks,if you use a hyperlink action in the automation, than the user will be redirected to the result of the action.I&#039;m using this option in my &quot;Conditional Wizard&quot; steps. I hope that at some point I won&#039;t need a workaround like this anymore :)https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/1284?messageid=1284Best regards,Daniel]]></description>
  5028.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Daniel Krüger Cosmo Consult)]]></author>
  5029.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4567#msg-4568</guid>
  5030.                <pubDate>Wed, 13 Mar 2024 14:47:49 +0100</pubDate>
  5031.                            </item>
  5032.                    <item>
  5033.                
  5034.                <title><![CDATA[[Solved] Override returnurl for path.]]></title>
  5035.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4567#msg-4567</link>
  5036.                <description><![CDATA[Hello everyone,I&#039;ve got a use case, where users want to make a specific path always redirect them to a specific dashboard. Right now, the returnurl parameter is built dynamically, and we (developers) don&#039;t have almost any possibilities to change that behavior (we can create our custom links, so there is some). In most cases it will work like that IF user opened element from the dashboard, but that&#039;s not always the case.I&#039;m thinking about &#039;override returnurl&#039; option on specific path - somewhere near &#039;wizard mode&#039;, but instead of staying in same url, we define where users should land.]]></description>
  5037.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Maksymilian Stachowiak)]]></author>
  5038.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4567#msg-4567</guid>
  5039.                <pubDate>Wed, 13 Mar 2024 14:38:32 +0100</pubDate>
  5040.                            </item>
  5041.                    <item>
  5042.                
  5043.                <title><![CDATA[Generate text file]]></title>
  5044.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4533#msg-4555</link>
  5045.                <description><![CDATA[Thanks, your suggestions are very welcome and will he helpful!]]></description>
  5046.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Michał Ludwiczak)]]></author>
  5047.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4533#msg-4555</guid>
  5048.                <pubDate>Tue, 12 Mar 2024 12:35:56 +0100</pubDate>
  5049.                            </item>
  5050.                    <item>
  5051.                
  5052.                <title><![CDATA[Generate text file]]></title>
  5053.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4533#msg-4554</link>
  5054.                <description><![CDATA[Hi Micha,even so it&#039;s a little bit hidden, you can already achieve it. The Add Attachment action supports generating a new file since you are using plain text this should solve your problem.https://docs.webcon.com/docs/2023R3/Studio/Action/Attachments/Action_AddAttachment#5-based-on-sql-querySELECT  CONVERT(IMAGE, &#039;{1006}&#039;) as Content, &#039;File.csv&#039; AS FileNameBest regards,Daniel]]></description>
  5055.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Daniel Krüger Cosmo Consult)]]></author>
  5056.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4533#msg-4554</guid>
  5057.                <pubDate>Tue, 12 Mar 2024 07:08:38 +0100</pubDate>
  5058.                            </item>
  5059.                    <item>
  5060.                
  5061.                <title><![CDATA[Attachment: Copy link / reference in rich text.]]></title>
  5062.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4528#msg-4542</link>
  5063.                <description><![CDATA[I had users asking for possibility to attach files inside text fields (It was possible somehow in IBM Notes), but this would solve that case too :)]]></description>
  5064.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Maksymilian Stachowiak)]]></author>
  5065.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4528#msg-4542</guid>
  5066.                <pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2024 09:24:07 +0100</pubDate>
  5067.                            </item>
  5068.                    <item>
  5069.                
  5070.                <title><![CDATA[Restoring old feature: Display constant group with context menu in rule]]></title>
  5071.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4530#msg-4541</link>
  5072.                <description><![CDATA[I&#039;m also missing this one, it could be used to have better readability.]]></description>
  5073.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Maksymilian Stachowiak)]]></author>
  5074.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4530#msg-4541</guid>
  5075.                <pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2024 09:21:08 +0100</pubDate>
  5076.                            </item>
  5077.                    <item>
  5078.                
  5079.                <title><![CDATA[Generate text file]]></title>
  5080.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4533#msg-4540</link>
  5081.                <description><![CDATA[This should be possible to do with Run A PowerShell Script Action*. But I&#039;m not sure if it is available in SaaSI&#039;m currently using it to generate XML files, but creating regular file would look like this:New-Item C:\temp\test.txtSet-Content C:\temp\test.txt &#039;This is a file created by webcon&#039;https://docs.webcon.com/docs/2023R3/Studio/Action/Integration/Action_PSExecutor]]></description>
  5082.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Maksymilian Stachowiak)]]></author>
  5083.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4533#msg-4540</guid>
  5084.                <pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2024 09:19:29 +0100</pubDate>
  5085.                            </item>
  5086.                    <item>
  5087.                
  5088.                <title><![CDATA[Disable parts of form rules]]></title>
  5089.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4531#msg-4534</link>
  5090.                <description><![CDATA[Just for historical purposes: This was also either part of a question in the forum.]]></description>
  5091.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Daniel Krüger Cosmo Consult)]]></author>
  5092.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4531#msg-4534</guid>
  5093.                <pubDate>Fri, 08 Mar 2024 15:06:39 +0100</pubDate>
  5094.                            </item>
  5095.                    <item>
  5096.                
  5097.                <title><![CDATA[Generate text file]]></title>
  5098.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4533#msg-4533</link>
  5099.                <description><![CDATA[Would be nice to be able to have an action that creates a plain text file from a value programmed similarly to a business rule.  This would be useful when creating input for bank transfers and possibly other applicatins that accept plain text file as an input.]]></description>
  5100.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Michał Ludwiczak)]]></author>
  5101.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4533#msg-4533</guid>
  5102.                <pubDate>Fri, 08 Mar 2024 14:09:55 +0100</pubDate>
  5103.                            </item>
  5104.                    <item>
  5105.                
  5106.                <title><![CDATA[Saving attachments from archived elements report]]></title>
  5107.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4467#msg-4532</link>
  5108.                <description><![CDATA[I thought this would be easy from programming point of view as the procedures are alreay there and the database structure of the archive is the same as the current one. I managed to save the attachments from the archived elements with a slightly modified dbo.Savefiles but would be nice to have this as default.]]></description>
  5109.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Michał Ludwiczak)]]></author>
  5110.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4467#msg-4532</guid>
  5111.                <pubDate>Fri, 08 Mar 2024 13:30:06 +0100</pubDate>
  5112.                            </item>
  5113.                    <item>
  5114.                
  5115.                <title><![CDATA[Disable parts of form rules]]></title>
  5116.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4531#msg-4531</link>
  5117.                <description><![CDATA[One feature, useful especially during debugging would be the ability to disable lines in form rules (let&#039;s say by some toggle n the right of the line alowing to either disable or enable this line).]]></description>
  5118.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Michał Ludwiczak)]]></author>
  5119.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4531#msg-4531</guid>
  5120.                <pubDate>Fri, 08 Mar 2024 13:26:53 +0100</pubDate>
  5121.                            </item>
  5122.                    <item>
  5123.                
  5124.                <title><![CDATA[Restoring old feature: Display constant group with context menu in rule]]></title>
  5125.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4530#msg-4530</link>
  5126.                <description><![CDATA[Hi,I&#039;m finally taking the time to add this user voice. I think it was in BPS 2020 or 2021 where the option was added that a constant in a business rule would be displayed in the format Group:Constant (1). Right clicking on the name of the constant would show a context menu with all constants in this group (2). This was similar to the one which is displayed if you right click on the choose field to switch from ID to Name.Can we get it back please. :)Best regards,Daniel]]></description>
  5127.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Daniel Krüger Cosmo Consult)]]></author>
  5128.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4530#msg-4530</guid>
  5129.                <pubDate>Fri, 08 Mar 2024 13:14:30 +0100</pubDate>
  5130.                            </item>
  5131.                    <item>
  5132.                
  5133.                <title><![CDATA[Business rule: Is edit mode active]]></title>
  5134.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4529#msg-4529</link>
  5135.                <description><![CDATA[Hi everyone,it would really be great if we could have the option to check in a business rule whether the edit mode is active.Currently we can check for: - Admin mode- Mobile device- Share modeAt the moment I&#039;m using a combination of business rule and form rule to hide /show an element which is confusing.An alternative or maybe an even better option would be to provide a rule /function with checks, whether a user has edit privileges.Best regards,Daniel]]></description>
  5136.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Daniel Krüger Cosmo Consult)]]></author>
  5137.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4529#msg-4529</guid>
  5138.                <pubDate>Fri, 08 Mar 2024 13:07:25 +0100</pubDate>
  5139.                            </item>
  5140.                    <item>
  5141.                
  5142.                <title><![CDATA[Attachment: Copy link / reference in rich text.]]></title>
  5143.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4528#msg-4528</link>
  5144.                <description><![CDATA[Hi everyone,I just received a response in a ticket and the rich text contained a link to an attachment. I&#039;ve never thought about this, but I really like this.In this context it would be great, if the context menu auf an attachment would have a function to copy the link of the attachment. Another cool feature in the rich text editor would be to add a link using the existing attachments.Best regards,Daniel]]></description>
  5145.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Daniel Krüger Cosmo Consult)]]></author>
  5146.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4528#msg-4528</guid>
  5147.                <pubDate>Fri, 08 Mar 2024 10:35:06 +0100</pubDate>
  5148.                            </item>
  5149.                    <item>
  5150.                
  5151.                <title><![CDATA[Max length property for textfields]]></title>
  5152.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4373#msg-4526</link>
  5153.                <description><![CDATA[I&#039;m wondering whether more people would also need this? If so, vote (click a thumbs up button)]]></description>
  5154.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Michal Rykiert)]]></author>
  5155.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4373#msg-4526</guid>
  5156.                <pubDate>Thu, 07 Mar 2024 14:16:12 +0100</pubDate>
  5157.                            </item>
  5158.                    <item>
  5159.                
  5160.                <title><![CDATA[Last comment on reports]]></title>
  5161.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4357#msg-4525</link>
  5162.                <description><![CDATA[I&#039;m happy to say this feature is going to be released in 2024 R1 :)]]></description>
  5163.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Michal Rykiert)]]></author>
  5164.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4357#msg-4525</guid>
  5165.                <pubDate>Thu, 07 Mar 2024 14:13:10 +0100</pubDate>
  5166.                            </item>
  5167.                    <item>
  5168.                
  5169.                <title><![CDATA[Designer Studio eficiency modyfications  - child window of child window ect ...]]></title>
  5170.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4518#msg-4518</link>
  5171.                <description><![CDATA[1. child of child focus ....I don&#039;t know how you, but for me is extremely annoying fact that I can&#039;t move one widow of &quot;configuration&quot; next other one and change focus and then modify what I need ... I need close all windows jump to other attribute open window open window open windo and then change something .... I would like to have open 2 windows separately[now I open 2x Design Studio, where 1st is for editing, 2nd if for &quot;to see more ... &quot;So I would like to have option to:- simply open window with graf (paths and steps) in separate window- open source windows in separate window (no I need to print screen paste to mspain/irfanview) then do to configuration od field function ect. [I don&#039;t believe that no one in &quot;Webcon Company&quot; is not doing like that ... )- open in new window attribute matrix .... I don&#039;t know on which step is visible or not particular attribute ... again I need to jump between designer studio &quot;tree&quot; .... 2. add option to colorize-  steps (no we have got arrows (OK, I would like maybe more colors up to 16 ... bot for now is not priority for me)I would like to colorize &quot;boxes&quot; as light &quot;body&quot; of square (step) ... why? .. becouse I would like to set -blueish color for group 1, greenish for group 2, grayish for grup 3 ect.by colors I see to ech grup in proces is signed task - generated diagram of steps of process don&#039;t need to have &quot;yellow stickers&quot; with description for how is tash ..- more colors for arrows 16 should be fine or allow to set colors ... (maybe section colors - where you can set particular steps as colors ect. )3. &quot;Property section&quot; like in for example in VBA - I see where attribute is visible (steps) ect. I can simply modify with out jumping on Designer Studio tree ....4. Probably I have more ideas but they are not so much important ... ;-)5. I would like to have option to save with out exporting project like I do change 1...2..3...20... but I need to jump to 3 and do other path of solution what I mean ... freeze stage ... I decided to set in DS &quot;where I am stage&quot; and now I can do 3 different path of solution I would like to do something  I don;t like it - fast back to freeze step (with out importing)  ...something like hot fix - remove hot fix (https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4503/15 )5a) the idea of exorting is OK, but ... I need selec that I need to export ... what I need to modify by importing ... to make mistake ... is very simple6. He window with importing ... yea ... do proper section I don&#039;t need to read: &quot;Data Source of name 1 ...bla bla bla will be overwrite  &quot;Data Source of name 2...bla bla bla will be overwrite  &quot;Data Source of name 3...bla bla bla will be overwrite (I don&#039;t know how you but I read from left ... not from middle ... )but simply: &quot;Data Source name:- name 1- name 2- name 3 next column name&quot; modify? yest now ... &quot;reading &quot;would you like to overwrite for each line ... c&#039;mon If I have 200-500 lines .... I don&#039;t see ... maybe if use bold for variables / names - then OK, could stay but still is not perfect.other word - simplify and clear view - remove &quot;noise&quot;7. If I see &quot;Use&quot; .. I would like to jump to Automation by duble clicking or context menu ...now I need scroll down, open tree ...find te automation click the Definition and then I see what I would like by doble click ...]]></description>
  5172.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Paweł Tołoczko)]]></author>
  5173.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4518#msg-4518</guid>
  5174.                <pubDate>Wed, 06 Mar 2024 09:56:54 +0100</pubDate>
  5175.                            </item>
  5176.                    <item>
  5177.                
  5178.                <title><![CDATA[Deactivation of the company]]></title>
  5179.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4369#msg-4517</link>
  5180.                <description><![CDATA[I think that the tab should remain, as well as its historical data. However, the visibility of the tab should be linked to the active company.]]></description>
  5181.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Dariusz Tułacz)]]></author>
  5182.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4369#msg-4517</guid>
  5183.                <pubDate>Wed, 06 Mar 2024 07:45:50 +0100</pubDate>
  5184.                            </item>
  5185.                    <item>
  5186.                
  5187.                <title><![CDATA[Mouse over of choose fields to display the id]]></title>
  5188.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4370#msg-4515</link>
  5189.                <description><![CDATA[As it happens, I just stumbled about such a case and it made me realize one thing. If the history is displayed in admin mode, the hover should display the value as it is.The line is choose column in the item list with a GUID as a the id and a number as the display name.As you can see it&#039;s displaying the GUID in version two and the number in version three. I have yet to understand why there&#039;s an addition # add the end in the database but it&#039;s neither displayed in the history nor in the form.It would have been easier to spot this problem if we had some way to look at the actual data.Best regards,Daniel]]></description>
  5190.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Daniel Krüger Cosmo Consult)]]></author>
  5191.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4370#msg-4515</guid>
  5192.                <pubDate>Tue, 05 Mar 2024 16:16:16 +0100</pubDate>
  5193.                            </item>
  5194.                    <item>
  5195.                
  5196.                <title><![CDATA[[WORK-AROUND]: ERROR WITH STRING REPLACE in Version 2023.1.3.29 (Form Field -&gt; Style and behavior)]]></title>
  5197.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4498#msg-4504</link>
  5198.                <description><![CDATA[................Daniel,that is a nice work around. Perfect.For all with the same trouble: You maybe have to copy the backslash &#039;\&#039; from another source. In my case, i was not able to write it manual in the field, but i could insert it with CTRL+V (eg directly out of Daniels post ;-) ).Now it works!So far, so good. I am not sure if there should be a permanent solution or at least a hint in the hovered info box. Super Tipp und groe Hilfe Daniel! Bjoern]]></description>
  5199.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Bjoern Poller)]]></author>
  5200.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4498#msg-4504</guid>
  5201.                <pubDate>Mon, 04 Mar 2024 20:02:14 +0100</pubDate>
  5202.                            </item>
  5203.                    <item>
  5204.                
  5205.                <title><![CDATA[Export Hotfix]]></title>
  5206.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4503#msg-4503</link>
  5207.                <description><![CDATA[Hello everyone,I&#039;ve encountered too many times situation, where i need to make really subtle change in application, to fix some kind of error/bug.Changes so small like:* Add column on a report* Update filter on picker field* Update filter on report* Check &#039;wizard mode&#039; on path* Reorder paths* and other fixes requiring less than 5 minutes of work in designer studio...Going through whole DEV/TEST/PROD workflow is overkill for those, and waiting 2+ weeks for making that change with next update is something i really want to avoid.At this moment I&#039;m ending up doing that changes 3 times. Once per each environment. It takes time to make it, and I&#039;m only human, i can do a typo, or miss that ID And Name, instead of just ID.Exporting DEV is also not really an option - there are already changes there, which shouldn&#039;t hit TEST/PROD, as they might be not ready to publish.I suggest that we could have a feature, that would allow us to export specific elements from the configuration, this would create a smaller .bpe file with only selected changes, that could be applied as hotfixes.It&#039;s nothing new especially for people who worked with some version control tools - cherrypicking should ring a bell :)I have two possible solutions in my head right now, but maybe other members will have some more.1. Possibility to select specific attribute / step / path / business rule / automation / basically any configurable object, and export it as .bpe file. I&#039;m imagining it under right mouse button menu -&gt; Export as Hotfix.1a. As an extension, maybe a possibility to check multiple objects using a tree like Objects (https://docs.webcon.com/docs/2023R3/Studio/BusinessRules_General/#objects)2. Possibility to select range from process History of Changes - sometimes creating that hotfix requires few tries, and it would be nice to be able to select a range of changes that would fix an error. (https://docs.webcon.com/docs/2023R3/Studio/Process/module_2_4_6_5)]]></description>
  5208.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Maksymilian Stachowiak)]]></author>
  5209.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4503#msg-4503</guid>
  5210.                <pubDate>Mon, 04 Mar 2024 19:50:19 +0100</pubDate>
  5211.                            </item>
  5212.                    <item>
  5213.                
  5214.                <title><![CDATA[Mouse over of choose fields to display the id]]></title>
  5215.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4370#msg-4502</link>
  5216.                <description><![CDATA[Hi Micha,in the audit trail / version history and there at least in the admin mode.Whenever we have a choose field / column, it would be great to have any kind of option to display the id. At the moment we have only the display name but I can think of a few cases, where the display name is not enough to identify, the selected value / person. In a larger company there will be persons with the same name and we can only identify the correct one by looking up the id in the database.Another case is, when some data is selected from an external system. I have had quite a few cases, where the customer deleted a record in the external system and created a new one with the same display name. I was only able to identify the reason, when I looked up the id. Best regards,Daniel]]></description>
  5217.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Daniel Krüger Cosmo Consult)]]></author>
  5218.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4370#msg-4502</guid>
  5219.                <pubDate>Mon, 04 Mar 2024 19:43:40 +0100</pubDate>
  5220.                            </item>
  5221.                    <item>
  5222.                
  5223.                <title><![CDATA[[WORK-AROUND]: ERROR WITH STRING REPLACE in Version 2023.1.3.29 (Form Field -&gt; Style and behavior)]]></title>
  5224.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4498#msg-4501</link>
  5225.                <description><![CDATA[Hi Bjrn,the string replace uses a regular expression in the background.You can simply escape the dot with a \ so that the regular expression looks for the dot character and not for any character.It looks a little strange int eh designer studio though.@MichaI hope they are not changing this behavior. Using the string replace in combination with regular expression came in handy. :)Best regards,Daniel]]></description>
  5226.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Daniel Krüger Cosmo Consult)]]></author>
  5227.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4498#msg-4501</guid>
  5228.                <pubDate>Mon, 04 Mar 2024 19:30:16 +0100</pubDate>
  5229.                            </item>
  5230.                    <item>
  5231.                
  5232.                <title><![CDATA[[WORK-AROUND]: ERROR WITH STRING REPLACE in Version 2023.1.3.29 (Form Field -&gt; Style and behavior)]]></title>
  5233.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4498#msg-4500</link>
  5234.                <description><![CDATA[Hi Bjorn, as far as I know, this scenario is already known and worked on (if not fixed already). I&#039;ll post an update once I have concrete info.Please note that bugs should be submitted via our support portal: https://support.webcon.com where they are reviewed, tested, and addressed accordingly. The User Voice is used to submit improvement ideas and feature requests.]]></description>
  5235.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Michal Rykiert)]]></author>
  5236.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4498#msg-4500</guid>
  5237.                <pubDate>Mon, 04 Mar 2024 16:40:28 +0100</pubDate>
  5238.                            </item>
  5239.                    <item>
  5240.                
  5241.                <title><![CDATA[Show the actual count of selected entries in reports]]></title>
  5242.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4386#msg-4499</link>
  5243.                <description><![CDATA[Thank you for the fast answers! I understand that and look forward to this.]]></description>
  5244.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Lena Schmidbauer)]]></author>
  5245.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4386#msg-4499</guid>
  5246.                <pubDate>Mon, 04 Mar 2024 14:24:45 +0100</pubDate>
  5247.                            </item>
  5248.                    <item>
  5249.                
  5250.                <title><![CDATA[[WORK-AROUND]: ERROR WITH STRING REPLACE in Version 2023.1.3.29 (Form Field -&gt; Style and behavior)]]></title>
  5251.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4498#msg-4498</link>
  5252.                <description><![CDATA[Hello,in the 2023.1.3.29 version, we have apparently identified a reproducible bug.In our case we are using a text field to store a time value. The goal is for this to automatically replace a period (&#039;.&#039;) with a colon (&#039;:&#039;) after input (Style and behavior).The error occurs when we attempt to replace every period (&#039;.&#039;) with another character using STRING REPLACE, specifically in the case of &quot;15.00&quot; where we want to replace each period (&#039;.&#039;). Instead of just replacing the periods, ALL characters are replaced with the replacement character.Consequently, replacing &#039;.&#039; with &#039;:&#039; results in &#039;:::::&#039;, and replacing &#039;.&#039; with &#039;14&#039; leads to &#039;1414141414&#039;.I have documented this issue very clearly in the attached graphic. The error occurred in an existing application but was also reproduced in a separate test app.Thanks for checking,Bjoern PollerJosef Raedlinger Group]]></description>
  5253.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Bjoern Poller)]]></author>
  5254.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4498#msg-4498</guid>
  5255.                <pubDate>Mon, 04 Mar 2024 14:09:21 +0100</pubDate>
  5256.                            </item>
  5257.                    <item>
  5258.                
  5259.                <title><![CDATA[Show the actual count of selected entries in reports]]></title>
  5260.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4386#msg-4497</link>
  5261.                <description><![CDATA[I see. From the technical and UX perspective there&#039;s one challenge related to the placement of such information. Since every column on our reports can have an additional value below (like sum, average, etc.), the placement you suggested on the screenshot is already reserved for those values. At the same time, most of our clients use pagination, which would limit the number of displayed rows. Therefore they&#039;re easier to manage for every user. With that said, I can promise that if the request for such functionality is repeated by others, we&#039;ll have a closer look at the implementation possibilities.]]></description>
  5262.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Michal Rykiert)]]></author>
  5263.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4386#msg-4497</guid>
  5264.                <pubDate>Mon, 04 Mar 2024 14:00:26 +0100</pubDate>
  5265.                            </item>
  5266.                    <item>
  5267.                
  5268.                <title><![CDATA[Visibility of Categories for manually attached e-mails.]]></title>
  5269.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4400#msg-4496</link>
  5270.                <description><![CDATA[Got&#039;cha!]]></description>
  5271.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Michal Rykiert)]]></author>
  5272.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4400#msg-4496</guid>
  5273.                <pubDate>Mon, 04 Mar 2024 13:48:11 +0100</pubDate>
  5274.                            </item>
  5275.                    <item>
  5276.                
  5277.                <title><![CDATA[Show the actual count of selected entries in reports]]></title>
  5278.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4386#msg-4495</link>
  5279.                <description><![CDATA[Hi Michal,Thank you so much for your answer!This function would make it clear how many records are selected and allow the end user to know at a glance how many records are actually selected.This would reduce the risk of forgetting a record  and provides a better overview of the report.So for me, the optimal solution would be to display another count (in brackets) with the selected records next to the total count.BRLena]]></description>
  5280.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Lena Schmidbauer)]]></author>
  5281.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4386#msg-4495</guid>
  5282.                <pubDate>Mon, 04 Mar 2024 13:20:45 +0100</pubDate>
  5283.                            </item>
  5284.                    <item>
  5285.                
  5286.                <title><![CDATA[Zoom in WorkFlow designer is reducing when saving or re-entering the tab]]></title>
  5287.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4384#msg-4494</link>
  5288.                <description><![CDATA[Hi Michal, Thank you very much for your answer!I&#039;m looking forward to this improvment.BRLena]]></description>
  5289.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Lena Schmidbauer)]]></author>
  5290.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4384#msg-4494</guid>
  5291.                <pubDate>Mon, 04 Mar 2024 13:07:05 +0100</pubDate>
  5292.                            </item>
  5293.                    <item>
  5294.                
  5295.                <title><![CDATA[Deactivation of the company]]></title>
  5296.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4369#msg-4490</link>
  5297.                <description><![CDATA[The idea itself is good, although some companies will definitely want to preserve the historical data, including the information about permissions. Therefore I&#039;m not sure if removing the tab is feasible. With that said, we&#039;ll see if there&#039;s anything we can do here.]]></description>
  5298.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Michal Rykiert)]]></author>
  5299.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4369#msg-4490</guid>
  5300.                <pubDate>Mon, 04 Mar 2024 12:26:34 +0100</pubDate>
  5301.                            </item>
  5302.                    <item>
  5303.                
  5304.                <title><![CDATA[Visibility of Categories for manually attached e-mails.]]></title>
  5305.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4400#msg-4488</link>
  5306.                <description><![CDATA[That is exactly what I&#039;m doing right now, and it is sufficient, i left a voice here, as it could be enchanced in the future :)]]></description>
  5307.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Maksymilian Stachowiak)]]></author>
  5308.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4400#msg-4488</guid>
  5309.                <pubDate>Mon, 04 Mar 2024 12:15:11 +0100</pubDate>
  5310.                            </item>
  5311.                    <item>
  5312.                
  5313.                <title><![CDATA[Mouse over of choose fields to display the id]]></title>
  5314.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4370#msg-4487</link>
  5315.                <description><![CDATA[Hi Daniel, in which area of the system do you experience a need of the ID?]]></description>
  5316.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Michal Rykiert)]]></author>
  5317.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4370#msg-4487</guid>
  5318.                <pubDate>Mon, 04 Mar 2024 12:10:52 +0100</pubDate>
  5319.                            </item>
  5320.                    <item>
  5321.                
  5322.                <title><![CDATA[Max length property for textfields]]></title>
  5323.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4373#msg-4486</link>
  5324.                <description><![CDATA[I understand the case. As proven in this thread, it&#039;s somewhat a matter of preference how to solve it. We&#039;ll take it into account during the work on UI/UX, although to be very transparent it&#039;s a low priority at this moment.]]></description>
  5325.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Michal Rykiert)]]></author>
  5326.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4373#msg-4486</guid>
  5327.                <pubDate>Mon, 04 Mar 2024 12:09:23 +0100</pubDate>
  5328.                            </item>
  5329.                    <item>
  5330.                
  5331.                <title><![CDATA[Zoom in WorkFlow designer is reducing when saving or re-entering the tab]]></title>
  5332.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4384#msg-4485</link>
  5333.                <description><![CDATA[Hi Lena, I hear you. What I can say is that we&#039;re actively working on improving the graphical workflow designer in Designer Studio. We&#039;ll take your suggestion into account. You should expect improvements in one of the HotRefresh releases of 2024 version.]]></description>
  5334.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Michal Rykiert)]]></author>
  5335.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4384#msg-4485</guid>
  5336.                <pubDate>Mon, 04 Mar 2024 12:07:09 +0100</pubDate>
  5337.                            </item>
  5338.                    <item>
  5339.                
  5340.                <title><![CDATA[Show the actual count of selected entries in reports]]></title>
  5341.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4386#msg-4484</link>
  5342.                <description><![CDATA[Hi Lena, could you please describe what is the business case behind your request? I understand the technical side of it, I&#039;d like to understand more the impact on the end-users.]]></description>
  5343.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Michal Rykiert)]]></author>
  5344.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4386#msg-4484</guid>
  5345.                <pubDate>Mon, 04 Mar 2024 12:05:33 +0100</pubDate>
  5346.                            </item>
  5347.                    <item>
  5348.                
  5349.                <title><![CDATA[Add parameters to HTML widgets in dashboards]]></title>
  5350.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4394#msg-4483</link>
  5351.                <description><![CDATA[This feature request is already in our backlog and we&#039;re in the process of defining a priority for it. I&#039;ll try to update this thread whenever I have more information.]]></description>
  5352.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Michal Rykiert)]]></author>
  5353.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4394#msg-4483</guid>
  5354.                <pubDate>Mon, 04 Mar 2024 12:03:25 +0100</pubDate>
  5355.                            </item>
  5356.                    <item>
  5357.                
  5358.                <title><![CDATA[Visibility of Categories for manually attached e-mails.]]></title>
  5359.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4400#msg-4482</link>
  5360.                <description><![CDATA[Currently, if you disable e-mail conversation from the global form template, then the users can select to which category the e-mail should be attached to and will display there.Is that sufficient for your business case?]]></description>
  5361.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Michal Rykiert)]]></author>
  5362.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4400#msg-4482</guid>
  5363.                <pubDate>Mon, 04 Mar 2024 12:02:12 +0100</pubDate>
  5364.                            </item>
  5365.                    <item>
  5366.                
  5367.                <title><![CDATA[Global HTML fields]]></title>
  5368.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4407#msg-4481</link>
  5369.                <description><![CDATA[It certainly makes sense to have an HTML field available as a global field. We&#039;ll evaluate it against other requests and priorities.]]></description>
  5370.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Michal Rykiert)]]></author>
  5371.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4407#msg-4481</guid>
  5372.                <pubDate>Mon, 04 Mar 2024 12:00:07 +0100</pubDate>
  5373.                            </item>
  5374.                    <item>
  5375.                
  5376.                <title><![CDATA[Saving attachments from archived elements report]]></title>
  5377.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4467#msg-4480</link>
  5378.                <description><![CDATA[Looking from the perspective of report usage, we put much more emphasis on reports showing current elements as they&#039;re used by everyone while reports with archived elements are used only by a fraction of users. With that said, I agree that it makes sense to have the feature you suggested in the archived elements report as well.If this request keeps repeating, we&#039;ll definitely take a closer look on how/when to implement it.]]></description>
  5379.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Michal Rykiert)]]></author>
  5380.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4467#msg-4480</guid>
  5381.                <pubDate>Mon, 04 Mar 2024 11:59:07 +0100</pubDate>
  5382.                            </item>
  5383.                    <item>
  5384.                
  5385.                <title><![CDATA[Postponed tasks]]></title>
  5386.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4469#msg-4479</link>
  5387.                <description><![CDATA[The reporting options you mention are system&#039;s standard, to be available for any client using WEBCON, without any additional effort needed. As a result, we need to thread carefully with any modifications as they&#039;ll impact virtually everyone. With that said, we are currently working on UI/UX improvements and we&#039;ll take your suggestion into account.]]></description>
  5388.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Michal Rykiert)]]></author>
  5389.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4469#msg-4479</guid>
  5390.                <pubDate>Mon, 04 Mar 2024 11:53:21 +0100</pubDate>
  5391.                            </item>
  5392.                    <item>
  5393.                
  5394.                <title><![CDATA[Date Time Picker]]></title>
  5395.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4419#msg-4478</link>
  5396.                <description><![CDATA[Maksymilian, I hear you :).We&#039;re currently working on an overall major Portal revamp. I&#039;ve already made sure we take your suggestion into account when it comes to improving the UI and UX of the system for the end-users. At the same time, please be aware the revamp project, although much desired, is quite extensive, so results may come in the major release after 2024 version is out.]]></description>
  5397.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Michal Rykiert)]]></author>
  5398.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4419#msg-4478</guid>
  5399.                <pubDate>Mon, 04 Mar 2024 11:49:56 +0100</pubDate>
  5400.                            </item>
  5401.                    <item>
  5402.                
  5403.                <title><![CDATA[Postponed tasks]]></title>
  5404.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4469#msg-4469</link>
  5405.                <description><![CDATA[Now there are 3 circles showing new tasks, all taks and overdue tasks. In my environment there are tasks that should be marked as postponed - some tasks should be separated from the normal ones, as users intentionally know they will do some task in the future, but don&#039;t want to mix these tasks with the current ones. There could be an action that would mark a task as postponed and another one marking as normal. I know that this can be achieved with a variable and grouping, but users like the task circles widget :)]]></description>
  5406.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Michał Ludwiczak)]]></author>
  5407.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4469#msg-4469</guid>
  5408.                <pubDate>Thu, 29 Feb 2024 13:08:58 +0100</pubDate>
  5409.                            </item>
  5410.                    <item>
  5411.                
  5412.                <title><![CDATA[Saving attachments from archived elements report]]></title>
  5413.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4467#msg-4467</link>
  5414.                <description><![CDATA[There should be possibility to save all attachemnts from the archived elements in the archived elements report just as in the normal report. I need this possibility badly now! :-)]]></description>
  5415.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Michał Ludwiczak)]]></author>
  5416.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4467#msg-4467</guid>
  5417.                <pubDate>Thu, 29 Feb 2024 12:43:30 +0100</pubDate>
  5418.                            </item>
  5419.                    <item>
  5420.                
  5421.                <title><![CDATA[BPS Groups inside BPS Grops]]></title>
  5422.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4366#msg-4446</link>
  5423.                <description><![CDATA[I can only associate myself with. The authorization concept takes some time getting used to.For example, we also have managers who actively participate in workflows themselves. However, as the process progresses, managers have more authorizations.Instead of being able to create a group with managers that I can then easily implement in various other groups and only having to replace the manager in one group when there is a change, you have to search through all groups where the employee may have been involved. Good suggestion!]]></description>
  5424.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Matthias)]]></author>
  5425.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4366#msg-4446</guid>
  5426.                <pubDate>Mon, 26 Feb 2024 15:50:42 +0100</pubDate>
  5427.                            </item>
  5428.                    <item>
  5429.                
  5430.                <title><![CDATA[Add save/upate in addition to the path transitions in mass actions]]></title>
  5431.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/2527#msg-4422</link>
  5432.                <description><![CDATA[Hi MichalMass actions are currently limited to execute a path on a certain step. With my suggestion, updating elements independent of the current step would be possible.]]></description>
  5433.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Markus Jenni)]]></author>
  5434.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/2527#msg-4422</guid>
  5435.                <pubDate>Wed, 21 Feb 2024 07:56:58 +0100</pubDate>
  5436.                            </item>
  5437.                    <item>
  5438.                
  5439.                <title><![CDATA[Date Time Picker]]></title>
  5440.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4419#msg-4419</link>
  5441.                <description><![CDATA[HI everyone, Since I&#039;ve started using Date Time picker in applications I&#039;m always confused when using that Time control part.Most of the time I&#039;m pressing Today instead of Close (and i can see same happens for other users), and it&#039;s frustrating that i can&#039;t type in the hour/minutes with keyboard.&#039;Today&#039; could be changed to &#039;Now&#039; - as we are in context of time, and &#039;Close&#039; would be more readable as &#039;Confirm&#039;.Pressing arrows with increment of 1 is not great :)I know it is possible to type in that time part in the field after selecting date, but if I&#039;m using picker for date, then it&#039;s not really comfy to close the picker, and type in the time manually.]]></description>
  5442.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Maksymilian Stachowiak)]]></author>
  5443.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4419#msg-4419</guid>
  5444.                <pubDate>Tue, 20 Feb 2024 15:52:38 +0100</pubDate>
  5445.                            </item>
  5446.                    <item>
  5447.                
  5448.                <title><![CDATA[Add save/upate in addition to the path transitions in mass actions]]></title>
  5449.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/2527#msg-4417</link>
  5450.                <description><![CDATA[Hi Markus,have you evaluated if configuring a path as in the screenshot attached wouldn&#039;t achieve the result you&#039;re expecting?]]></description>
  5451.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Michal Rykiert)]]></author>
  5452.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/2527#msg-4417</guid>
  5453.                <pubDate>Tue, 20 Feb 2024 15:25:44 +0100</pubDate>
  5454.                            </item>
  5455.                    <item>
  5456.                
  5457.                <title><![CDATA[Character counting]]></title>
  5458.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4402#msg-4408</link>
  5459.                <description><![CDATA[This is exactly what I needed. Thanks!]]></description>
  5460.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Dariusz Tułacz)]]></author>
  5461.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4402#msg-4408</guid>
  5462.                <pubDate>Sun, 18 Feb 2024 18:45:32 +0100</pubDate>
  5463.                            </item>
  5464.                    <item>
  5465.                
  5466.                <title><![CDATA[Global HTML fields]]></title>
  5467.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4407#msg-4407</link>
  5468.                <description><![CDATA[Hi,could we have an option to define global HTML fields?This would allow us to define the HTML field ones instead of multiple times in multiple process.Best regards,Daniel]]></description>
  5469.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Daniel Krüger Cosmo Consult)]]></author>
  5470.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4407#msg-4407</guid>
  5471.                <pubDate>Sun, 18 Feb 2024 17:11:26 +0100</pubDate>
  5472.                            </item>
  5473.                    <item>
  5474.                
  5475.                <title><![CDATA[Character counting]]></title>
  5476.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4402#msg-4405</link>
  5477.                <description><![CDATA[Hi Dariusz, there is already word/character counter at least in version 2023.1.3.29.It requires to select that it will be formatted field, but it doesn&#039;t require any formatting options to be active.So on advanced configuration in tab &quot;Standard&quot; mark it as formatted, and in tab &quot;Advanced&quot; uncheck everything.]]></description>
  5478.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Maksymilian Stachowiak)]]></author>
  5479.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4402#msg-4405</guid>
  5480.                <pubDate>Thu, 15 Feb 2024 15:12:05 +0100</pubDate>
  5481.                            </item>
  5482.                    <item>
  5483.                
  5484.                <title><![CDATA[Character counting]]></title>
  5485.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4402#msg-4402</link>
  5486.                <description><![CDATA[I propose that the &quot;Multiple lines of text&quot; attribute should include an optional checkbox that will activate character counting.]]></description>
  5487.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Dariusz Tułacz)]]></author>
  5488.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4402#msg-4402</guid>
  5489.                <pubDate>Thu, 15 Feb 2024 09:57:05 +0100</pubDate>
  5490.                            </item>
  5491.                    <item>
  5492.                
  5493.                <title><![CDATA[Visibility of Categories for manually attached e-mails.]]></title>
  5494.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4400#msg-4400</link>
  5495.                <description><![CDATA[There is a possibility to attach an email by dragging it manually from outlook to the attachments area. By doing so, user is asked about category, to which attachment should be added, but it&#039;s visible later only in the history, and not on the form.I suggest, that categories should be also visible on e-mail conversations tab, so when user selects it, it is not hidden.]]></description>
  5496.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Maksymilian Stachowiak)]]></author>
  5497.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4400#msg-4400</guid>
  5498.                <pubDate>Wed, 14 Feb 2024 10:12:29 +0100</pubDate>
  5499.                            </item>
  5500.                    <item>
  5501.                
  5502.                <title><![CDATA[Add parameters to HTML widgets in dashboards]]></title>
  5503.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4394#msg-4394</link>
  5504.                <description><![CDATA[Can we have a new feature to add context variables to the HTML dashboard widget?For example application ID, ID of a report etc.When copying application from Production to Test, the report IDs are different and HTML links are therefore broken.]]></description>
  5505.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (josh white)]]></author>
  5506.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4394#msg-4394</guid>
  5507.                <pubDate>Tue, 13 Feb 2024 13:26:54 +0100</pubDate>
  5508.                            </item>
  5509.                    <item>
  5510.                
  5511.                <title><![CDATA[Last comment on reports]]></title>
  5512.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4357#msg-4391</link>
  5513.                <description><![CDATA[Let me say this: it&#039;s coming :)I&#039;ll keep you posted once I can give you some indication of when.]]></description>
  5514.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Michal Rykiert)]]></author>
  5515.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4357#msg-4391</guid>
  5516.                <pubDate>Tue, 13 Feb 2024 12:22:28 +0100</pubDate>
  5517.                            </item>
  5518.                    <item>
  5519.                
  5520.                <title><![CDATA[Show the actual count of selected entries in reports]]></title>
  5521.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4386#msg-4386</link>
  5522.                <description><![CDATA[Dear WEBCON Team,currently in reports, the total number of entries is always displayed even when selecting certain entries.Is it possible to add another counting function to see below &quot;count all&quot; and &quot;count selected&quot; entries?Another improvement would be to enable selection across mutiple report pages.Can this be enabled?Best Regards,Lena]]></description>
  5523.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Lena Schmidbauer)]]></author>
  5524.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4386#msg-4386</guid>
  5525.                <pubDate>Tue, 13 Feb 2024 10:08:22 +0100</pubDate>
  5526.                            </item>
  5527.                    <item>
  5528.                
  5529.                <title><![CDATA[Zoom in WorkFlow designer is reducing when saving or re-entering the tab]]></title>
  5530.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4384#msg-4384</link>
  5531.                <description><![CDATA[Dear WEBCON Team, has anyone else noticed that when you zoom in the WorkFlow designer and press save or leave the tab then re-enter, the zoom is significantly reduced. This seems inconvenient.Is there a setting with which the zoom stays as adjusted per me?Best Regards,Lena]]></description>
  5532.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Lena Schmidbauer)]]></author>
  5533.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4384#msg-4384</guid>
  5534.                <pubDate>Tue, 13 Feb 2024 08:36:17 +0100</pubDate>
  5535.                            </item>
  5536.                    <item>
  5537.                
  5538.                <title><![CDATA[Max length property for textfields]]></title>
  5539.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4373#msg-4383</link>
  5540.                <description><![CDATA[I&#039;m a bit allergic to red messages, like they are shown when I&#039;m using length limitation via regular expression.So I started to use a html field and some code to set the max length property and placed a hint either in the description of the field or used the input placeholder.I think this might also be a good approach from an accessibility perspective.When there is another way to display a hint about the maximal length, I&#039;m up for it. This might be something that is best answered by an UX specialist.]]></description>
  5541.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Markus Jenni)]]></author>
  5542.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4373#msg-4383</guid>
  5543.                <pubDate>Tue, 13 Feb 2024 07:31:49 +0100</pubDate>
  5544.                            </item>
  5545.                    <item>
  5546.                
  5547.                <title><![CDATA[Deactivation of the company]]></title>
  5548.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4369#msg-4382</link>
  5549.                <description><![CDATA[Hi, would be nice, at least if this is limited to the UI, in the background it should be as it is. No changes to the export/import process.In one case we have in the production environment two databases with the same process and one database in the test environment. When moving to production different entities are deactivated while all are active in the test environment. If one get&#039;s deactivated in the test environment for some reason, the import should leave the privileges assigned to them as they are. :)Best regards,Daniel]]></description>
  5550.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Daniel Krüger Cosmo Consult)]]></author>
  5551.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4369#msg-4382</guid>
  5552.                <pubDate>Mon, 12 Feb 2024 19:38:44 +0100</pubDate>
  5553.                            </item>
  5554.                    <item>
  5555.                
  5556.                <title><![CDATA[Max length property for textfields]]></title>
  5557.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4373#msg-4379</link>
  5558.                <description><![CDATA[I&#039;m up for that change, but it should also display message to the users, as Daniel mentioned - no message would be confusing.]]></description>
  5559.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Maksymilian Stachowiak)]]></author>
  5560.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4373#msg-4379</guid>
  5561.                <pubDate>Mon, 12 Feb 2024 16:00:59 +0100</pubDate>
  5562.                            </item>
  5563.                    <item>
  5564.                
  5565.                <title><![CDATA[BPS Groups inside BPS Grops]]></title>
  5566.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4366#msg-4378</link>
  5567.                <description><![CDATA[I&#039;m currently switching for BPS Groups, as a default for privileges management, and I can confirm, that this would be really helpfull to have it.Simplest case, create a single group for access to application, which would have nested groups with specific permissions. No need to remember that i have to add user as a specific role, and also access to the application.]]></description>
  5568.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Maksymilian Stachowiak)]]></author>
  5569.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4366#msg-4378</guid>
  5570.                <pubDate>Mon, 12 Feb 2024 15:57:59 +0100</pubDate>
  5571.                            </item>
  5572.                    <item>
  5573.                
  5574.                <title><![CDATA[Max length property for textfields]]></title>
  5575.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4373#msg-4377</link>
  5576.                <description><![CDATA[I&#039;m not sure about it, there&#039;s no visible indicator and it just &quot;stops&quot; adding more characters which again my lead to confusion.]]></description>
  5577.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Daniel Krüger Cosmo Consult)]]></author>
  5578.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4373#msg-4377</guid>
  5579.                <pubDate>Mon, 12 Feb 2024 15:04:06 +0100</pubDate>
  5580.                            </item>
  5581.                    <item>
  5582.                
  5583.                <title><![CDATA[Max length property for textfields]]></title>
  5584.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4373#msg-4373</link>
  5585.                <description><![CDATA[It happens quite often, that the length of a textfield has to be limited. This can easily be achieved by a reqular expression.However, input fields with inputmode text allow the usage of the maxlength attribute.  It would by much nicer to restrict the user to type in more than the defined letters rather than showing a red error message.Therefore, it would be great to introduce a max length property for text fields]]></description>
  5586.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Markus Jenni)]]></author>
  5587.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4373#msg-4373</guid>
  5588.                <pubDate>Mon, 12 Feb 2024 10:28:14 +0100</pubDate>
  5589.                            </item>
  5590.                    <item>
  5591.                
  5592.                <title><![CDATA[Mouse over of choose fields to display the id]]></title>
  5593.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4370#msg-4370</link>
  5594.                <description><![CDATA[Hi everyone,it would be great if there would be some option to show the id of a choose field in the browser. Maybe in the history or history in admin mode?Use case: Two users with the same display name and there&#039;s currently no option to identify which user was selected without relying on the database.Best regards,Daniel]]></description>
  5595.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Daniel Krüger Cosmo Consult)]]></author>
  5596.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4370#msg-4370</guid>
  5597.                <pubDate>Mon, 12 Feb 2024 09:00:17 +0100</pubDate>
  5598.                            </item>
  5599.                    <item>
  5600.                
  5601.                <title><![CDATA[Deactivation of the company]]></title>
  5602.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4369#msg-4369</link>
  5603.                <description><![CDATA[Hello, after deactivating a company, it should not be possible to assign permissions to the process on this company&#039;s tab. The idea is to reduce the number of tabs.RegardsD.]]></description>
  5604.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Dariusz Tułacz)]]></author>
  5605.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4369#msg-4369</guid>
  5606.                <pubDate>Mon, 12 Feb 2024 08:59:43 +0100</pubDate>
  5607.                            </item>
  5608.                    <item>
  5609.                
  5610.                <title><![CDATA[BPS Groups inside BPS Grops]]></title>
  5611.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4366#msg-4366</link>
  5612.                <description><![CDATA[I am unsure if this was requested already because searching for anything has become a nightmare in this community. Still... in AD, you can add groups as members of other groups, but when using and creating BPS Groups, this is not possible, and managing the rights with BPS Groups is not the nicest in certain situations, especially if the customer has to do it. They have hundreds of users to add in multiple groups multiple times.]]></description>
  5613.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Razvan Ogrezeanu - ENCORSA Romania)]]></author>
  5614.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4366#msg-4366</guid>
  5615.                <pubDate>Sat, 10 Feb 2024 11:12:40 +0100</pubDate>
  5616.                            </item>
  5617.                    <item>
  5618.                
  5619.                <title><![CDATA[OpenID connect parameters]]></title>
  5620.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4328#msg-4358</link>
  5621.                <description><![CDATA[Hi,in case the thumbs up are counted, please add the ones of my user voice too. :)https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/692?messageid=692Best regards,Daniel]]></description>
  5622.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Daniel Krüger Cosmo Consult)]]></author>
  5623.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4328#msg-4358</guid>
  5624.                <pubDate>Wed, 07 Feb 2024 20:35:32 +0100</pubDate>
  5625.                            </item>
  5626.                    <item>
  5627.                
  5628.                <title><![CDATA[Last comment on reports]]></title>
  5629.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4357#msg-4357</link>
  5630.                <description><![CDATA[Hello, I&#039;m having a case, where I need to display last comment, author of the comment, and date on a Data Table attribute.I don&#039;t want to move the comments, to parent flow, as this will create a lot of mess due to lots of child flows.I thought this could be a built in feature, same as we can select last comment in buisness rules context, we could access it from reports, and webcon data sources, so it would be easy to display it.]]></description>
  5631.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Maksymilian Stachowiak)]]></author>
  5632.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4357#msg-4357</guid>
  5633.                <pubDate>Wed, 07 Feb 2024 13:32:42 +0100</pubDate>
  5634.                            </item>
  5635.                    <item>
  5636.                
  5637.                <title><![CDATA[OpenID connect parameters]]></title>
  5638.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4328#msg-4328</link>
  5639.                <description><![CDATA[Hi,OpenID connect is missing custom additional url parameters management functionality. This is required for some auth providers processing definition (e.g. Auth0 - flow automatization, login customization). More information https://openid.net/specs/openid-connect-basic-1_0.html#RequestParameters.]]></description>
  5640.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (lukaszboruta)]]></author>
  5641.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4328#msg-4328</guid>
  5642.                <pubDate>Mon, 05 Feb 2024 12:02:15 +0100</pubDate>
  5643.                            </item>
  5644.                    <item>
  5645.                
  5646.                <title><![CDATA[Info and prevent saving if there are outstanding http requests]]></title>
  5647.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4317#msg-4317</link>
  5648.                <description><![CDATA[Hi,I&#039;ve cases where one choose field updates another choose field. If the data source is not a SQL database this can take some time.Setting the first field takes about 1 second, (1) in the attachment.Getting picker search results 540msValidate picker control 460msThe setting and validation of the target field (2) takes again 1700ms and another 390 ms for executing a form rule.Setting target form field first choose field 1160msValidate picker control 611msSetting own target fields 0msForm role on value change 390Since the second field could be modified manually afterwards, I can&#039;t simply change the field type.In these cases, it would be great, if there&#039;s some information that there&#039;s are outstanding http requests. I&#039;m aware, that it will be difficult to find a balance between to much/to few information.But at the same time it&#039;s strange when the user sees the value of the second field in the popup search and then the target field values do not reflect the value for a longer time, without any information.There&#039;s also one drawback I&#039;ve encountered.If the user doesn&#039;t wait and hit&#039;s save / uses a path, the target fields may not have been updated yet.Best regards,Daniel]]></description>
  5649.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Daniel Krüger Cosmo Consult)]]></author>
  5650.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4317#msg-4317</guid>
  5651.                <pubDate>Wed, 31 Jan 2024 07:41:43 +0100</pubDate>
  5652.                            </item>
  5653.                    <item>
  5654.                
  5655.                <title><![CDATA[Dynamic Language Workflow Preview]]></title>
  5656.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4066#msg-4310</link>
  5657.                <description><![CDATA[.]]></description>
  5658.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (nobody)]]></author>
  5659.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4066#msg-4310</guid>
  5660.                <pubDate>Mon, 29 Jan 2024 13:40:37 +0100</pubDate>
  5661.                            </item>
  5662.                    <item>
  5663.                
  5664.                <title><![CDATA[Adding a new field in group]]></title>
  5665.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4290#msg-4300</link>
  5666.                <description><![CDATA[That would be neat, I&#039;m currently checking if i can copy some attribute, just to avoid that few clicks, but if attribute have some styles etc. it usually backfires :)]]></description>
  5667.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Maksymilian Stachowiak)]]></author>
  5668.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4290#msg-4300</guid>
  5669.                <pubDate>Fri, 26 Jan 2024 15:06:25 +0100</pubDate>
  5670.                            </item>
  5671.                    <item>
  5672.                
  5673.                <title><![CDATA[Adding a new field in group]]></title>
  5674.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4290#msg-4290</link>
  5675.                <description><![CDATA[It would make sense if newly added form fields to a group of fields would inherit form types assignment from the group. Now, if you assign a group to let&#039;s say one of 3 available form types, when you add a form field to this group, it is automatically assigned to all 3 form fields, with no inheritance.]]></description>
  5676.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Michał Ludwiczak)]]></author>
  5677.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4290#msg-4290</guid>
  5678.                <pubDate>Fri, 26 Jan 2024 08:18:11 +0100</pubDate>
  5679.                            </item>
  5680.                    <item>
  5681.                
  5682.                <title><![CDATA[Pie Charts]]></title>
  5683.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4283#msg-4283</link>
  5684.                <description><![CDATA[Dear Allwe have a lot of pie charts at our dashboards and when someone has a lot of cases in different instances of pie chart dimenssion e.g. depo, country, acceptacne path it is difficult (esspecially since WEBCON2022) to select certain part of data. it would be nice to have option to select one lable from the graph legen or deselect all and then select one instead of deselecting several + recent dispaying of the values on pie chart doesn&#039;t bring a lot of value as it only shows number of instances and name of the report view]]></description>
  5685.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Robert Ogierman)]]></author>
  5686.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4283#msg-4283</guid>
  5687.                <pubDate>Thu, 25 Jan 2024 11:55:22 +0100</pubDate>
  5688.                            </item>
  5689.                    <item>
  5690.                
  5691.                <title><![CDATA[Horizontal group layout but with a limit]]></title>
  5692.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4263#msg-4277</link>
  5693.                <description><![CDATA[Limit meaning &quot;new line after X elements&quot; :)]]></description>
  5694.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Michał Ludwiczak)]]></author>
  5695.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4263#msg-4277</guid>
  5696.                <pubDate>Tue, 23 Jan 2024 16:04:11 +0100</pubDate>
  5697.                            </item>
  5698.                    <item>
  5699.                
  5700.                <title><![CDATA[Horizontal group layout but with a limit]]></title>
  5701.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4263#msg-4276</link>
  5702.                <description><![CDATA[It&#039;s not exactly what you are asking for, but this information might be viable - during Webcon Day 2023, we&#039;ve got an inside into new possibilities planned for forms.There will be much more flexibility in how we will be able to position fields, and from what i remember it should cover this use case :)]]></description>
  5703.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Maksymilian Stachowiak)]]></author>
  5704.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4263#msg-4276</guid>
  5705.                <pubDate>Tue, 23 Jan 2024 15:54:44 +0100</pubDate>
  5706.                            </item>
  5707.                    <item>
  5708.                
  5709.                <title><![CDATA[Required comment]]></title>
  5710.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4109#msg-4274</link>
  5711.                <description><![CDATA[By design, the comment field is meant to be an instantly available and simple way of adding additional information to the form. For more complex scenarios (like conditional behavior of the field) you&#039;d need to use multiple lines of text field and then play with its behavior. You&#039;ll achieve the same result.From our perspective, it&#039;s important to make the platform as useful as possible while keeping it lean (every additional feature needs to be maintained, be compatible between versions, etc.). Therefore, since the desired outcome is fairly easily achievable in other ways, it would be hard to justify implementing an additional feature just for the comment field.]]></description>
  5712.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Michal Rykiert)]]></author>
  5713.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4109#msg-4274</guid>
  5714.                <pubDate>Tue, 23 Jan 2024 10:20:04 +0100</pubDate>
  5715.                            </item>
  5716.                    <item>
  5717.                
  5718.                <title><![CDATA[SQL report]]></title>
  5719.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4242#msg-4267</link>
  5720.                <description><![CDATA[You&#039;re right, I wrote it a bit wrong.I have an attribute that contains the data source as a list of values e.g. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 etc.I want to display only values 3 and 5 on the report.]]></description>
  5721.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (User)]]></author>
  5722.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4242#msg-4267</guid>
  5723.                <pubDate>Sat, 20 Jan 2024 12:10:22 +0100</pubDate>
  5724.                            </item>
  5725.                    <item>
  5726.                
  5727.                <title><![CDATA[Excel genetarion]]></title>
  5728.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4265#msg-4265</link>
  5729.                <description><![CDATA[It would be very helpful if excel generating action and data table attribute ability to save as excel could produce an Excel file with or without columns headers. This is sometimes useful, as some external applications accept only data in excel files and no headers.]]></description>
  5730.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Michał Ludwiczak)]]></author>
  5731.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4265#msg-4265</guid>
  5732.                <pubDate>Sat, 20 Jan 2024 09:13:38 +0100</pubDate>
  5733.                            </item>
  5734.                    <item>
  5735.                
  5736.                <title><![CDATA[Vacation history and plans]]></title>
  5737.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4264#msg-4264</link>
  5738.                <description><![CDATA[In template configuration of vacation template generated process we have 2 important data sources - vacation history and vacation plans. Their display on vacation chart is different - history has legend and colors for different types of absences, whereas plans are displayed just in one color and there are no types. Another difference is that history items do not point to the original item, whereas plans allow us to link to the original element. One more difference I&#039;ve noticed is that no matter what are the specific dates (from and to) of the elements in the vacation history data source - the vacation chart shows only the items dated older than today. The plans however show all dates. After this a bit long introduction - my postulate is to remove the artificially applied filter of the vacation chart generating engine. The user should decide what dates spread the want in each of therse groups (history and plans) by forming an appropriate filtering the the sql query. The vacation chart can be used for several other applications than just vacation. The currently applied filtering restricts these uses, really.]]></description>
  5739.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Michał Ludwiczak)]]></author>
  5740.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4264#msg-4264</guid>
  5741.                <pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2024 23:19:24 +0100</pubDate>
  5742.                            </item>
  5743.                    <item>
  5744.                
  5745.                <title><![CDATA[Horizontal group layout but with a limit]]></title>
  5746.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4263#msg-4263</link>
  5747.                <description><![CDATA[I was thinking that it is a good thing you can place attributes horizontaly in a group. However in addition there could be something like &quot;number of attributes in a row&quot;. An example - when I have 9 attributes in a group and would like to place them in a matrix 3 x 3 (let&#039;s say in this case this is the best layout for some purpose) now I have to create 3 groups of 3 attributes and turn off the visibility of group names. My idea is to make system do it by itself. One more advantage is that in Designer Studio the groups wouldn&#039;t  have to be artificially divided - clearer and more logical appearance.]]></description>
  5748.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Michał Ludwiczak)]]></author>
  5749.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4263#msg-4263</guid>
  5750.                <pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2024 23:08:03 +0100</pubDate>
  5751.                            </item>
  5752.                    <item>
  5753.                
  5754.                <title><![CDATA[Running global form rules on any page load]]></title>
  5755.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4262#msg-4262</link>
  5756.                <description><![CDATA[It would be very helpful if one could create a global form rule and webcon would run it on every page load (especially the pages outside of apps as there is no way you could perform anything there now). This way you could force a user to &quot;punch the clock&quot; after logging to webcon (load and start a dedicated workflow) or show some important information after the user logs in.]]></description>
  5757.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Michał Ludwiczak)]]></author>
  5758.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4262#msg-4262</guid>
  5759.                <pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2024 22:59:59 +0100</pubDate>
  5760.                            </item>
  5761.                    <item>
  5762.                
  5763.                <title><![CDATA[SQL report]]></title>
  5764.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4242#msg-4250</link>
  5765.                <description><![CDATA[Hi,I&#039;m sorry, but I don&#039;t grasp what you are asking. You can only display the columns/attribute selected in the column tabs. In the views you can define, which of these selected columns would be available.I don&#039;t see any relation to the filter. Maye reading through this post will help you:https://community.webcon.com/posts/post/reports-configuration-views-editing/233Or/and you could add more information / an example. - What attributes/fields there are in the dictionary.- What entries exists.- What entries should be displayed.- What should not be displayed.Best regards,Daniel]]></description>
  5766.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Daniel Krüger Cosmo Consult)]]></author>
  5767.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4242#msg-4250</guid>
  5768.                <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jan 2024 21:46:28 +0100</pubDate>
  5769.                            </item>
  5770.                    <item>
  5771.                
  5772.                <title><![CDATA[[SOLVED] WEBCON: Update attachment action -&gt; Q: How to rename attachments WITH continous numbering ?]]></title>
  5773.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/699#msg-4243</link>
  5774.                <description><![CDATA[Hello Martin. Ive used the loop mechanism by storing my Item list to Share point, but I noticed the same limitation with maximal &quot;10 consecutive transition paths..&quot;. Did you somehow solve the issue, or is this a technical limitation in Webcon which can not be solved?]]></description>
  5775.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Erik)]]></author>
  5776.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/699#msg-4243</guid>
  5777.                <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jan 2024 09:41:22 +0100</pubDate>
  5778.                            </item>
  5779.                    <item>
  5780.                
  5781.                <title><![CDATA[SQL report]]></title>
  5782.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4242#msg-4242</link>
  5783.                <description><![CDATA[I have a question:How to create an SQL filter in the &quot;source&quot; section of the report that will show only the column/attribute items indicated in this SQL. The attribute column consists of the dictionary entry ?]]></description>
  5784.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (User)]]></author>
  5785.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4242#msg-4242</guid>
  5786.                <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jan 2024 09:40:33 +0100</pubDate>
  5787.                            </item>
  5788.                    <item>
  5789.                
  5790.                <title><![CDATA[Horizontal arrangement of form fields in TAB]]></title>
  5791.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4218#msg-4226</link>
  5792.                <description><![CDATA[Hi Karol,this probably won&#039;t be realized as there&#039;s a more powerful option planned for BPS 2024.Best regards,Daniel]]></description>
  5793.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Daniel Krüger Cosmo Consult)]]></author>
  5794.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4218#msg-4226</guid>
  5795.                <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jan 2024 07:31:08 +0100</pubDate>
  5796.                            </item>
  5797.                    <item>
  5798.                
  5799.                <title><![CDATA[Horizontal arrangement of form fields in TAB]]></title>
  5800.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4218#msg-4218</link>
  5801.                <description><![CDATA[HiA useful option would be to add the ability to set the horizontal layout of attributes directly in the tab.The same as now it is possible in the group of form fields.Regards.]]></description>
  5802.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Karol Częczek)]]></author>
  5803.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4218#msg-4218</guid>
  5804.                <pubDate>Mon, 15 Jan 2024 09:05:01 +0100</pubDate>
  5805.                            </item>
  5806.                    <item>
  5807.                
  5808.                <title><![CDATA[Increased size for WFD_Att Choose columns.]]></title>
  5809.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4210#msg-4210</link>
  5810.                <description><![CDATA[Hi,WFD_Att Choose columns have size nvarchar(1000). When using the &#039;allow multiple values&#039; mode and having translations in the source into 3-4 languages, additionally if the ID is e.g. guid, this value is exceeded very quickly.Is it possible to increase the database size of this type of columns to nvarchar(4000)?Regards]]></description>
  5811.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Karol Częczek)]]></author>
  5812.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4210#msg-4210</guid>
  5813.                <pubDate>Thu, 11 Jan 2024 15:55:43 +0100</pubDate>
  5814.                            </item>
  5815.                    <item>
  5816.                
  5817.                <title><![CDATA[Path authorization: Display authentication method in history]]></title>
  5818.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4206#msg-4206</link>
  5819.                <description><![CDATA[Hi,as always when a new feature is provided, new requests will follow immediately. :)It would be great to see in the workflow history whether path authorization was used and which method was used. At the moment, it&#039;s not at all visible if path authorization was used at all.If the authorization is activated for existing workflows, we can&#039;t distinguish which instances have been using it. Best regards,Daniel]]></description>
  5820.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Daniel Krüger Cosmo Consult)]]></author>
  5821.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4206#msg-4206</guid>
  5822.                <pubDate>Wed, 10 Jan 2024 14:25:44 +0100</pubDate>
  5823.                            </item>
  5824.                    <item>
  5825.                
  5826.                <title><![CDATA[History: UTC time when mouse hovers over the time.]]></title>
  5827.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4205#msg-4205</link>
  5828.                <description><![CDATA[Hi,it would be great to have the UTC time in a hover effect of a time. In the attached screenshot you see the same element but with different times. One browser is running on a server with a different time zone. Even so it&#039;s explain it can cause confusion. Therefore some way of displaying the UTC+0 time would be great.Best regards,Daniel]]></description>
  5829.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Daniel Krüger Cosmo Consult)]]></author>
  5830.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4205#msg-4205</guid>
  5831.                <pubDate>Wed, 10 Jan 2024 14:22:25 +0100</pubDate>
  5832.                            </item>
  5833.                    <item>
  5834.                
  5835.                <title><![CDATA[Geolocation &amp; path authorization with method application]]></title>
  5836.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4204#msg-4204</link>
  5837.                <description><![CDATA[Hi,  I really like the new path authorization feature and we will surely use it. The geolocation is also an interesting addition but if it&#039;s used in combination with the path authorization it will created unexpected results.I noticed that the geolocation of the browser is used, even if path authorization with method &quot;application&quot; is used. If this method is used, it would be great to use the location of the device instead.I made two tests, one with and one without active VPN. As expected I had two different locations. This is understandable, but if the path authorization with mode &quot;Application&quot; is used, I would expect the location of the mobile device instead of either one.The mentioned features are new in BPS 2023 R3https://webcon.com/whats-new-in-webcon-bps-2023-r3/Best regards,Daniel]]></description>
  5838.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Daniel Krüger Cosmo Consult)]]></author>
  5839.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4204#msg-4204</guid>
  5840.                <pubDate>Wed, 10 Jan 2024 14:18:40 +0100</pubDate>
  5841.                            </item>
  5842.                    <item>
  5843.                
  5844.                <title><![CDATA[Start tile without popup]]></title>
  5845.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4189#msg-4200</link>
  5846.                <description><![CDATA[It dosn&#039;t seem to be very important, but it really is complicating users life. I suggest to come back to previous form behaviour as well.]]></description>
  5847.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (MikeS)]]></author>
  5848.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4189#msg-4200</guid>
  5849.                <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jan 2024 08:22:26 +0100</pubDate>
  5850.                            </item>
  5851.                    <item>
  5852.                
  5853.                <title><![CDATA[Start tile without popup]]></title>
  5854.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4189#msg-4198</link>
  5855.                <description><![CDATA[I confirm my colleague&#039;s request. We are also struggling with &#039;non friendly&#039; comments from the business side. Maybe Webcon have plan to change that?]]></description>
  5856.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Damian)]]></author>
  5857.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4189#msg-4198</guid>
  5858.                <pubDate>Mon, 08 Jan 2024 15:11:57 +0100</pubDate>
  5859.                            </item>
  5860.                    <item>
  5861.                
  5862.                <title><![CDATA[Company selection]]></title>
  5863.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4185#msg-4191</link>
  5864.                <description><![CDATA[It would be great to see such a change in Designer!]]></description>
  5865.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Marcin Cudny)]]></author>
  5866.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4185#msg-4191</guid>
  5867.                <pubDate>Mon, 08 Jan 2024 12:00:45 +0100</pubDate>
  5868.                            </item>
  5869.                    <item>
  5870.                
  5871.                <title><![CDATA[Start tile without popup]]></title>
  5872.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4189#msg-4189</link>
  5873.                <description><![CDATA[Hi.In version 2023, the method of handling company selection when starting from a tile has been changed. Previously, if the remaining parameters were defined in the button configuration, a form was immediately displayed and the company could be changed directly there. Currently, a popup always appears in this situation and the company can be changed later on the form. Users report this as an unfriendly solution. I wonder if it would be possible to introduce an element in the tile configuration that would specify the method of selecting a company. Popup + form or form.Regards.]]></description>
  5874.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Karol Częczek)]]></author>
  5875.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4189#msg-4189</guid>
  5876.                <pubDate>Mon, 08 Jan 2024 11:45:19 +0100</pubDate>
  5877.                            </item>
  5878.                    <item>
  5879.                
  5880.                <title><![CDATA[Company selection]]></title>
  5881.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4185#msg-4188</link>
  5882.                <description><![CDATA[I confirm the problem. With many of companies, the work is very uncomfortable]]></description>
  5883.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Damian)]]></author>
  5884.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4185#msg-4188</guid>
  5885.                <pubDate>Mon, 08 Jan 2024 11:06:57 +0100</pubDate>
  5886.                            </item>
  5887.                    <item>
  5888.                
  5889.                <title><![CDATA[Company selection]]></title>
  5890.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4185#msg-4187</link>
  5891.                <description><![CDATA[I&#039;m working with only 4 configured companies, on rather wide screen 2560px, and it is already not really comfortable.Can&#039;t imagine how frustrating it might be with more than 10 companies, so I&#039;d love to see that changed :)]]></description>
  5892.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Maksymilian Stachowiak)]]></author>
  5893.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4185#msg-4187</guid>
  5894.                <pubDate>Mon, 08 Jan 2024 10:59:20 +0100</pubDate>
  5895.                            </item>
  5896.                    <item>
  5897.                
  5898.                <title><![CDATA[Company selection]]></title>
  5899.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4185#msg-4185</link>
  5900.                <description><![CDATA[Hi everyone. While searchin/changing permissions in Webcon, there are tabs to choose. If there is more than can fit to window width, scrolling them is dramaticly slow. I suggest to change it to dropdown list. With search option would be great.[2024-07-09 - reminder]]]></description>
  5901.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (MikeS)]]></author>
  5902.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4185#msg-4185</guid>
  5903.                <pubDate>Mon, 08 Jan 2024 10:55:30 +0100</pubDate>
  5904.                            </item>
  5905.                    <item>
  5906.                
  5907.                <title><![CDATA[List&#039;s order change by dragging.]]></title>
  5908.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4152#msg-4182</link>
  5909.                <description><![CDATA[Hi KarolUntil WEBCON does implement this super cool feature, you might be able to use my approach.We had this requirement for one of our projects. I used jQuery sortable https://jqueryui.com/sortable/ and a technical field on the itemlist that tracks the sort order.  What I&#039;m doing is, waiting for the itemlist to be rendered, then I&#039;m applying the sortable extension with a function which is setting the sort order on the technical field.function waitForElm(selector) {    return new Promise(resolve =&gt; {        if (document.querySelector(selector)) {            return resolve(document.querySelector(selector));        }        const observer = new MutationObserver(mutations =&gt; {            if (document.querySelector(selector)) {                resolve(document.querySelector(selector));                observer.disconnect();            }        });        observer.observe(document.body, {            childList: true,            subtree: true        });    });}waitForElm(&quot;#SubElems_#{WFCON:483}# .table tbody&quot;).then((elem) =&gt; {    $(elem).sortable({       cursor: &#039;move&#039;,       axis: &#039;y&#039;,       stop: function(e, ui) {       changeSortorder();       }});});function changeSortorder() {  $(&quot;.subelem-row&quot;).each(function(index) {      var row = $(this).attr(&quot;data-index&quot;);      console.log(row);      if (row == undefined) { return;}      SetSubTypedValue(#{WFCON:483}#, row, &#039;#{SFLD:23}#&#039;, { value: index + 1 });  })}We will have to find a solution when migrating to 2023 (cash instead of jquery) :(]]></description>
  5910.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Markus Jenni)]]></author>
  5911.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4152#msg-4182</guid>
  5912.                <pubDate>Fri, 05 Jan 2024 22:02:25 +0100</pubDate>
  5913.                            </item>
  5914.                    <item>
  5915.                
  5916.                <title><![CDATA[LACK OF PRIVILEGES ERROR IN EXECUTING THE GENERATE/UPDATE A WORD FILE FROM MENU BUTTON]]></title>
  5917.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4167#msg-4181</link>
  5918.                <description><![CDATA[wellin last ver. 2023.1.3.29 20.12.2023 is fixed]]></description>
  5919.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Paweł Tołoczko)]]></author>
  5920.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4167#msg-4181</guid>
  5921.                <pubDate>Fri, 05 Jan 2024 14:15:18 +0100</pubDate>
  5922.                            </item>
  5923.                    <item>
  5924.                
  5925.                <title><![CDATA[LACK OF PRIVILEGES ERROR IN EXECUTING THE GENERATE/UPDATE A WORD FILE FROM MENU BUTTON]]></title>
  5926.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4167#msg-4180</link>
  5927.                <description><![CDATA[no that is the hyperlink that was fixed and other things not the download generate word action. That is a question I posted. Thank you]]></description>
  5928.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (ruthw)]]></author>
  5929.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4167#msg-4180</guid>
  5930.                <pubDate>Fri, 05 Jan 2024 14:08:37 +0100</pubDate>
  5931.                            </item>
  5932.                    <item>
  5933.                
  5934.                <title><![CDATA[LACK OF PRIVILEGES ERROR IN EXECUTING THE GENERATE/UPDATE A WORD FILE FROM MENU BUTTON]]></title>
  5935.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4167#msg-4178</link>
  5936.                <description><![CDATA[I thin your answer is here:https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4138in last update was fixed.]]></description>
  5937.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Paweł Tołoczko)]]></author>
  5938.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4167#msg-4178</guid>
  5939.                <pubDate>Fri, 05 Jan 2024 13:49:43 +0100</pubDate>
  5940.                            </item>
  5941.                    <item>
  5942.                
  5943.                <title><![CDATA[LACK OF PRIVILEGES ERROR IN EXECUTING THE GENERATE/UPDATE A WORD FILE FROM MENU BUTTON]]></title>
  5944.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4167#msg-4167</link>
  5945.                <description><![CDATA[An error (lack of privileges) in executing the Generate/Update a Word file triggered from the Menu button by a user who had privileges to read an instance but not to edit it. This is happening after upgrade to version 2023.1.2.124. It was working in previous version we were using. It would be great if we can go back to allowing users with read only access to generate a word file. Thank you]]></description>
  5946.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (ruthw)]]></author>
  5947.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4167#msg-4167</guid>
  5948.                <pubDate>Thu, 04 Jan 2024 21:54:56 +0100</pubDate>
  5949.                            </item>
  5950.                    <item>
  5951.                
  5952.                <title><![CDATA[Companies in substitution definition]]></title>
  5953.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4162#msg-4162</link>
  5954.                <description><![CDATA[Hi. I would suggest to simplify company selector in substitutions. In environments with multiple companies and several content databases list of companies is cross join of both, making it difficult for the user to choose and also requires adding several substitudions records for each content database (content database names are rather technical name and are not usefull for end users).I know that it requires to relate companies accros all content databases - maybe it&#039;s good time to move companies definitons to config database, and allow mappings between content database and company?]]></description>
  5955.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Jacek)]]></author>
  5956.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4162#msg-4162</guid>
  5957.                <pubDate>Thu, 04 Jan 2024 13:33:35 +0100</pubDate>
  5958.                            </item>
  5959.                    <item>
  5960.                
  5961.                <title><![CDATA[[Closed] Folders for Automations]]></title>
  5962.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4161#msg-4161</link>
  5963.                <description><![CDATA[It would be a nice touch if we could group Automations inside Process Configuration, same as we can group Form Rules, Constants, or Business Rules.I really love how flexible Automations are, especially in case of any API integrations where global ones are created, and they might be used everywhere.Their own success makes lack of folders feel like that small stone in pair of comfy shoes ;)Closed in favour of -&gt; https://community.webcon.com/forum/new-message/4840]]></description>
  5964.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Maksymilian Stachowiak)]]></author>
  5965.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4161#msg-4161</guid>
  5966.                <pubDate>Thu, 04 Jan 2024 13:16:30 +0100</pubDate>
  5967.                            </item>
  5968.                    <item>
  5969.                
  5970.                <title><![CDATA[Show the last 5-10 history elements, not only show all history]]></title>
  5971.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4141#msg-4159</link>
  5972.                <description><![CDATA[Hi Maksymilian,It depends on the process. In one process, data is updated based on another system, in other processes, many users make entries.]]></description>
  5973.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Krystian Golik)]]></author>
  5974.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4141#msg-4159</guid>
  5975.                <pubDate>Thu, 04 Jan 2024 07:51:06 +0100</pubDate>
  5976.                            </item>
  5977.                    <item>
  5978.                
  5979.                <title><![CDATA[List&#039;s order change by dragging.]]></title>
  5980.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4152#msg-4152</link>
  5981.                <description><![CDATA[It would be very useful from the users&#039; point of view to add the ability to change the order/positionrows of the item list by dragging.Regards]]></description>
  5982.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Karol Częczek)]]></author>
  5983.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4152#msg-4152</guid>
  5984.                <pubDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2024 10:16:10 +0100</pubDate>
  5985.                            </item>
  5986.                    <item>
  5987.                
  5988.                <title><![CDATA[Show the last 5-10 history elements, not only show all history]]></title>
  5989.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4141#msg-4149</link>
  5990.                <description><![CDATA[Hi Krystian,I have to ask what use case generates so many versions? Is it a business or a technical one?]]></description>
  5991.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Maksymilian Stachowiak)]]></author>
  5992.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4141#msg-4149</guid>
  5993.                <pubDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2024 08:47:14 +0100</pubDate>
  5994.                            </item>
  5995.                    <item>
  5996.                
  5997.                <title><![CDATA[Show the last 5-10 history elements, not only show all history]]></title>
  5998.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4141#msg-4141</link>
  5999.                <description><![CDATA[The history of items sometimes contains from several to several hundred or several thousand items. A proposal to add the possibility of presenting the last 5-10 history elements, because with hundreds of history elements a timeout error is received.]]></description>
  6000.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Krystian Golik)]]></author>
  6001.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4141#msg-4141</guid>
  6002.                <pubDate>Thu, 28 Dec 2023 19:44:23 +0100</pubDate>
  6003.                            </item>
  6004.                    <item>
  6005.                
  6006.                <title><![CDATA[Time type attribute]]></title>
  6007.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4136#msg-4136</link>
  6008.                <description><![CDATA[I would like to suggest building two actions:1. Converting the value (integer) to the equivalent number of hours and minutes.2. Adding and subtracting two time attributes (types of action).Example:Ad. 1. 90 = 1 h 30 minAd. 2. 1h 30 min + 0 h 40 min = 2 h 10 min]]></description>
  6009.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Dariusz Tułacz)]]></author>
  6010.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4136#msg-4136</guid>
  6011.                <pubDate>Thu, 21 Dec 2023 09:30:23 +0100</pubDate>
  6012.                            </item>
  6013.                    <item>
  6014.                
  6015.                <title><![CDATA[Extend V_WFElements with GUIDs]]></title>
  6016.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4134#msg-4134</link>
  6017.                <description><![CDATA[Hi,it would be nice if the view V_WFElements would not only contain the integer id but the GUID. I&#039;m not sure whether using the view in a calculated column would be more performant or creating an own join, but only for one table.For example(select Count(*) from V_WfElements childs where childs.DTYPE_GUID = &#039;0000&#039; ... further conditions)vs(select Count(*) from WfElements childs join WFDocTypes  on childs.WFD_DTYPEID = DTYPE_ID and DTYPE_GUID = &#039;0000&#039; where  .... further conditions)I didn&#039;t test this query so it may be off and there could be syntax errors, but I think it&#039;s clear what I want to tell.Best regards,Daniel]]></description>
  6018.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Daniel Krüger Cosmo Consult)]]></author>
  6019.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4134#msg-4134</guid>
  6020.                <pubDate>Mon, 18 Dec 2023 21:54:44 +0100</pubDate>
  6021.                            </item>
  6022.                    <item>
  6023.                
  6024.                <title><![CDATA[Fields of the time type]]></title>
  6025.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4020#msg-4119</link>
  6026.                <description><![CDATA[Hello, I do not want to start new thread in this topic. In WEBCON, please consider also change of standard Date Time functionality, as time setting is easy to overlook for new users.]]></description>
  6027.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Ondrej)]]></author>
  6028.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4020#msg-4119</guid>
  6029.                <pubDate>Thu, 14 Dec 2023 16:20:28 +0100</pubDate>
  6030.                            </item>
  6031.                    <item>
  6032.                
  6033.                <title><![CDATA[Custom default names for dictionary step and path with translations]]></title>
  6034.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4097#msg-4113</link>
  6035.                <description><![CDATA[I&#039;ve been thinking about running Designer Studio with English, and keeping Polish default names. Not much of having different defaults in different processes.Although i can see a use case for larger integrators, which are developing for multiple countries - having such a config could help with setting different defaults based on customer language - per developer seat.If developer works on many projects then he just changes the config file, Designer Studio is still in English.Specifying translations separately requires some time, setting field names in correct language reduces it.Although I&#039;m thinking it&#039;s like with a code - probably it&#039;s better to prepare process configuration in English, so more people will be able to work on it.Separation of concerns - configuration is not translation.]]></description>
  6036.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Maksymilian Stachowiak)]]></author>
  6037.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4097#msg-4113</guid>
  6038.                <pubDate>Thu, 14 Dec 2023 08:33:04 +0100</pubDate>
  6039.                            </item>
  6040.                    <item>
  6041.                
  6042.                <title><![CDATA[Excel spreadsheet preview]]></title>
  6043.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4112#msg-4112</link>
  6044.                <description><![CDATA[Hi!I wanted to ask if the removal of the preview of XLSX files could be reconsidered? Perhaps as a toggled parameter. :)It was an important functionality for our company and after upgrading to BPS2023 we have to come up with a different solution for the preview of simple spreadsheets that are attached to BPS documents.Thanks, Patryk]]></description>
  6045.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Patryk Jachimczyk)]]></author>
  6046.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4112#msg-4112</guid>
  6047.                <pubDate>Thu, 14 Dec 2023 07:24:04 +0100</pubDate>
  6048.                            </item>
  6049.                    <item>
  6050.                
  6051.                <title><![CDATA[Custom default names for dictionary step and path with translations]]></title>
  6052.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4097#msg-4111</link>
  6053.                <description><![CDATA[Would you really have one process which uses Polish for default names while others use English or German? :)We are using English as default and are providing the German translation. But this is probably due to the fact that we are partner. In the end I wouldn&#039;t care, it&#039;s just something which could really help.One more thing regarding the dictionaries /templates I do every time. I set the form to &quot;default edit mode&quot;. If anyone displays a dictionary entry /document template the likeliness that nothing should be changed is near non existent. :)]]></description>
  6054.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Daniel Krüger Cosmo Consult)]]></author>
  6055.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4097#msg-4111</guid>
  6056.                <pubDate>Wed, 13 Dec 2023 21:37:48 +0100</pubDate>
  6057.                            </item>
  6058.                    <item>
  6059.                
  6060.                <title><![CDATA[Required comment]]></title>
  6061.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4109#msg-4109</link>
  6062.                <description><![CDATA[HiIt would be useful in the form rule to have the ability to make a comment mandatory. We have cases where, depending on certain selected values, we need a mandatory comment.Thanks,Raluca]]></description>
  6063.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Raluca-Mirabela Lupu)]]></author>
  6064.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4109#msg-4109</guid>
  6065.                <pubDate>Wed, 13 Dec 2023 18:02:20 +0100</pubDate>
  6066.                            </item>
  6067.                    <item>
  6068.                
  6069.                <title><![CDATA[Global application home]]></title>
  6070.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4108#msg-4108</link>
  6071.                <description><![CDATA[Dear All, Would you like the idea having global application home on Webcon portal, which means you can include reports/dashboards for multiple applications even from different content databases?In our situation we separated content databases as per organization structure, which is usually useful, but it is a disadvantage if you want to show a consolidated high level view. I know that it is feasible with external reporting (like PowerBI), but I would be happy if there were a standard feature on Webcon portal.Or what about making related process feature capable to refer process from other content database? This way allowing a common application layer....What do you think?BRPeter]]></description>
  6072.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (SIMON Péter)]]></author>
  6073.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4108#msg-4108</guid>
  6074.                <pubDate>Wed, 13 Dec 2023 17:40:00 +0100</pubDate>
  6075.                            </item>
  6076.                    <item>
  6077.                
  6078.                <title><![CDATA[Custom default names for dictionary step and path with translations]]></title>
  6079.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4097#msg-4103</link>
  6080.                <description><![CDATA[This would be great, although I&#039;d rather put it inside a config file.That way each developer could set their own defaults. It could also allow running Designer Studio with English language, and having default names in other language.]]></description>
  6081.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Maksymilian Stachowiak)]]></author>
  6082.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4097#msg-4103</guid>
  6083.                <pubDate>Wed, 13 Dec 2023 12:00:01 +0100</pubDate>
  6084.                            </item>
  6085.                    <item>
  6086.                
  6087.                <title><![CDATA[Reuse translations of columns from a BPS internal view in a Data row / data table]]></title>
  6088.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4098#msg-4102</link>
  6089.                <description><![CDATA[I&#039;m not dealing with translations, but this seems like a big help for those who do - I&#039;m sure I would always forget to update reports after changing translations on attribute.]]></description>
  6090.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Maksymilian Stachowiak)]]></author>
  6091.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4098#msg-4102</guid>
  6092.                <pubDate>Wed, 13 Dec 2023 11:55:08 +0100</pubDate>
  6093.                            </item>
  6094.                    <item>
  6095.                
  6096.                <title><![CDATA[Error importing an application if it was cloned]]></title>
  6097.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4099#msg-4099</link>
  6098.                <description><![CDATA[Hi everyone!I&#039;ll start with the app package import error message, then some details: System.Exception: Exception occurred while importing table WFDetailConfigs ---&gt; System.InvalidOperationException: No item type: WFBusinessRuleDefinitions, id: 2752   at WebCon.WorkFlow.Base.ImportExport.Mapping.MappingList.GetBySourceId(Int32 id, DbNodeType dbNodeType)   at WebCon.WorkFlow.Base.ImportExport.Import.ForeignKeyFinder.c__DisplayClass7_0.b__1(ForeignKeyReplacePair pair) ...I have an app which was created as a clone of an existing one - just because the original app had most of the needed fields. No issues exporting the new app into package.From the error message I presume that the original app had some [at least one] business rules I didn&#039;t need for the new app, therefore I deleted them, thus the import error.Now, the new app does not point towards that id, 2752, with any object, either field/business rule/form rule etc. Also, the original app does not have any objects with id 2752.However, WFDetailConfigs contains an id of 2752 whose configuration points to ... the original app id.There are &quot;Verify process&quot; and &quot;Verify entire configuration&quot; options in the Tasks menu, none of them helpful here.No matter the source of this issue, is there a way to delete the remaining links of original app into the new app, so that the export from this Dev goes clean to import on the Test/Prod env?Thank you,Mihail]]></description>
  6099.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Mihail Moise)]]></author>
  6100.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4099#msg-4099</guid>
  6101.                <pubDate>Wed, 13 Dec 2023 11:00:11 +0100</pubDate>
  6102.                            </item>
  6103.                    <item>
  6104.                
  6105.                <title><![CDATA[Reuse translations of columns from a BPS internal view in a Data row / data table]]></title>
  6106.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4098#msg-4098</link>
  6107.                <description><![CDATA[Hi,if a data row/ data table is based on a BPS internal view to configure, whether the names/translations of the columns should be used. The default value should be true. It&#039;s just a waste of time to not only provide the translations the first time but also to update these when the name/translation of the referenced column changes.Most of the time it&#039;s forgotten anyway.Best regards,Daniel]]></description>
  6108.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Daniel Krüger Cosmo Consult)]]></author>
  6109.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4098#msg-4098</guid>
  6110.                <pubDate>Wed, 13 Dec 2023 10:02:49 +0100</pubDate>
  6111.                            </item>
  6112.                    <item>
  6113.                
  6114.                <title><![CDATA[Custom default names for dictionary step and path with translations]]></title>
  6115.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4097#msg-4097</link>
  6116.                <description><![CDATA[Hi,I think it would be beneficial if we could have a place in the global configuration where we can define custom default values for the steps and paths of dictionaries / document templates.For example I always rename the &quot;Dictionary step&quot; to &quot;Entry&quot;.Of course, I also define translations for the the step and paths. Therefore it would be great, if we could define the translations for the step and path on a global level too.Best regards,Daniel]]></description>
  6117.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Daniel Krüger Cosmo Consult)]]></author>
  6118.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4097#msg-4097</guid>
  6119.                <pubDate>Wed, 13 Dec 2023 09:53:21 +0100</pubDate>
  6120.                            </item>
  6121.                    <item>
  6122.                
  6123.                <title><![CDATA[Dynamic Language Workflow Preview]]></title>
  6124.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4066#msg-4066</link>
  6125.                <description><![CDATA[Hello,We recently started to take better care of translating our applications in our native language as well as English.This way our clients will have a more professional experience.Even if we have everything translated, the preview that we see is in the language used for naming the steps/paths initially.It would be a nice touch if the language of the preview would be the same as the language selected in the users settings.Obviously, if a path/step has missing translations, the default value would be used.Regards]]></description>
  6126.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Mihai Marza)]]></author>
  6127.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4066#msg-4066</guid>
  6128.                <pubDate>Tue, 05 Dec 2023 10:51:58 +0100</pubDate>
  6129.                            </item>
  6130.                    <item>
  6131.                
  6132.                <title><![CDATA[Step Edit - Step Selector]]></title>
  6133.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4053#msg-4053</link>
  6134.                <description><![CDATA[Hello,Right now there are Next step, and Previous step buttons on the Step Edit window, but if we need to edit two steps, which are X steps apart, then we have to:* Click X times - and every have some delay - loading the data.* Close step editor, and use list on the workflow, or the diagram to select step which we want to edit.I&#039;ve got an idea that in the Step Edit window, we could add list of steps (list, tree, tabs) to choose from.An example in attachments :)]]></description>
  6135.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Maksymilian Stachowiak)]]></author>
  6136.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4053#msg-4053</guid>
  6137.                <pubDate>Fri, 01 Dec 2023 10:07:20 +0100</pubDate>
  6138.                            </item>
  6139.                    <item>
  6140.                
  6141.                <title><![CDATA[Pictures inside choice field]]></title>
  6142.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4044#msg-4044</link>
  6143.                <description><![CDATA[Hello,I&#039;m looking for a feature to be able to display images inside drop-down, or pop-up choice field.Either form Picture field, or from Single line of text in Picture mode.Use case:I&#039;m working on a process, where sales department should specify which base product should be used as a starting point to create a new one.There is a long list of those base products, and remembering how each one looks just by number/name is not possible.Displaying the base product during selection could help with selecting right base, and speed up further processes.I&#039;ve been showing the image after selecting value from choice field, but in the end it&#039;s not the same (had similar need in 2 processes so far).]]></description>
  6144.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Maksymilian Stachowiak)]]></author>
  6145.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4044#msg-4044</guid>
  6146.                <pubDate>Wed, 29 Nov 2023 13:07:26 +0100</pubDate>
  6147.                            </item>
  6148.                    <item>
  6149.                
  6150.                <title><![CDATA[The default name for the new automation]]></title>
  6151.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4035#msg-4041</link>
  6152.                <description><![CDATA[The only reason for naming /displaying the automation at all is the documentation. Would be nice, if the automation uses the same name as the parent object, renaming the parent object would also update the automation. Ok, this could only happen for paths, but I was lazy enough to forget about it. :)]]></description>
  6153.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Daniel Krüger Cosmo Consult)]]></author>
  6154.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4035#msg-4041</guid>
  6155.                <pubDate>Tue, 28 Nov 2023 19:18:35 +0100</pubDate>
  6156.                            </item>
  6157.                    <item>
  6158.                
  6159.                <title><![CDATA[The default name for the new automation]]></title>
  6160.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4035#msg-4036</link>
  6161.                <description><![CDATA[I&#039;ve been thinking about it too lately. It had a purpose to name Actions under single path, but if there is no way to have more automations on path than 1, then I don&#039;t see a point in naming them at all.Default name like that would be good enough :)]]></description>
  6162.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Maksymilian Stachowiak)]]></author>
  6163.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4035#msg-4036</guid>
  6164.                <pubDate>Tue, 28 Nov 2023 10:35:25 +0100</pubDate>
  6165.                            </item>
  6166.                    <item>
  6167.                
  6168.                <title><![CDATA[The default name for the new automation]]></title>
  6169.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4035#msg-4035</link>
  6170.                <description><![CDATA[Hi,Maybe it would be a good idea for a new automation to be created by default to receive the name of the element for which it was created.This would help keep the system tidy, reduce the workload for each time you assign a name,.And for people who prefer other names, nothing will change because you will have to enter your name anyway.Regards]]></description>
  6171.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Karol Częczek)]]></author>
  6172.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4035#msg-4035</guid>
  6173.                <pubDate>Tue, 28 Nov 2023 10:02:10 +0100</pubDate>
  6174.                            </item>
  6175.                    <item>
  6176.                
  6177.                <title><![CDATA[Generate documentation for application]]></title>
  6178.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4034#msg-4034</link>
  6179.                <description><![CDATA[Hi,it would really be great, if we could trigger the documentation generation for a whole application.It doesn&#039;t have to be a single document. It would be fine if this would just create a zip package. In this zip packages there would be the default documents for all processes. This would include the related processes too.Now I&#039;m going back to generating the documentation for ten processes again...Best regards,Daniel]]></description>
  6180.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Daniel Krüger Cosmo Consult)]]></author>
  6181.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4034#msg-4034</guid>
  6182.                <pubDate>Tue, 28 Nov 2023 09:29:22 +0100</pubDate>
  6183.                            </item>
  6184.                    <item>
  6185.                
  6186.                <title><![CDATA[Fields of the time type]]></title>
  6187.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4020#msg-4020</link>
  6188.                <description><![CDATA[Hi,It would be nice if we also had fields of the time type. Some clients need to record, for example, the time of arrival and the time of departure, and this is not possible through standard fields.Thanks,Raluca]]></description>
  6189.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Raluca-Mirabela Lupu)]]></author>
  6190.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4020#msg-4020</guid>
  6191.                <pubDate>Fri, 24 Nov 2023 09:12:42 +0100</pubDate>
  6192.                            </item>
  6193.                    <item>
  6194.                
  6195.                <title><![CDATA[Auto expand tooltip on edit]]></title>
  6196.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/3992#msg-3992</link>
  6197.                <description><![CDATA[Hello,While designing form I&#039;m often getting questions about possibility to set some additional description to the field.I&#039;m usually talking about the tooltip, but it requires the action of end user - he have to willingly hover on the () icon, to display the message, and there is no guarantee, that he will see it.Right now it ends with creating HTML field with some description near the field, which in my opinion unnecessary clutters the form.My idea is that we could have some configurable checkbox - &#039;Auto expand tooltip on field edit&#039;, and maybe some duration setting so it would disappear after x seconds.]]></description>
  6198.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Maksymilian Stachowiak)]]></author>
  6199.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/3992#msg-3992</guid>
  6200.                <pubDate>Mon, 20 Nov 2023 12:49:11 +0100</pubDate>
  6201.                            </item>
  6202.                    <item>
  6203.                
  6204.                <title><![CDATA[An action for generating a diynamic number of word files from different templates.]]></title>
  6205.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/1549#msg-3985</link>
  6206.                <description><![CDATA[True story. The introduction of the foreach operator was an amazing and long waited feature. It solved many performance issues. P.s. Can&#039;t wait for the case operator.]]></description>
  6207.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Razvan Ogrezeanu - ENCORSA Romania)]]></author>
  6208.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/1549#msg-3985</guid>
  6209.                <pubDate>Fri, 17 Nov 2023 22:08:06 +0100</pubDate>
  6210.                            </item>
  6211.                    <item>
  6212.                
  6213.                <title><![CDATA[An action for generating a diynamic number of word files from different templates.]]></title>
  6214.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/1549#msg-3981</link>
  6215.                <description><![CDATA[Hi Razvan,I&#039;ll post here an update, as while searching for answer on the same question I ended up here, and it seems like there is a way to do it now.In my case - I&#039;m generating monthly report, which is a single item list on a form - so each month there is new document created in Webcon, with multiple positions on the list.I need to generate Word document for each position on that list.I&#039;m able to achieve it using Automation with For Each Operator, inside which there is Generate/Update a Word file Action.While creating template I&#039;ve selected specific columns, as placeholders, and thats it.For file name, you can also just use Values tab, and pick specific column from the list.]]></description>
  6216.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Maksymilian Stachowiak)]]></author>
  6217.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/1549#msg-3981</guid>
  6218.                <pubDate>Fri, 17 Nov 2023 14:42:51 +0100</pubDate>
  6219.                            </item>
  6220.                    <item>
  6221.                
  6222.                <title><![CDATA[Search in History of Changes]]></title>
  6223.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/3961#msg-3961</link>
  6224.                <description><![CDATA[Hi!Earlier there was a feature in BPS Studio to search in changes history of processes. It&#039;s not available anymore in BPS 2022.1.4. We miss it much. Is there any plan to make it available again?:Thanks!]]></description>
  6225.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (SIMON Péter)]]></author>
  6226.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/3961#msg-3961</guid>
  6227.                <pubDate>Tue, 14 Nov 2023 09:46:14 +0100</pubDate>
  6228.                            </item>
  6229.                    <item>
  6230.                
  6231.                <title><![CDATA[Option to generate/convert documents to pdf/a]]></title>
  6232.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/1504#msg-3959</link>
  6233.                <description><![CDATA[Hi,Functionality is implemented and available in 2023 R2 version.BR,Andrzej]]></description>
  6234.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Andrzej Koń)]]></author>
  6235.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/1504#msg-3959</guid>
  6236.                <pubDate>Tue, 14 Nov 2023 09:27:27 +0100</pubDate>
  6237.                            </item>
  6238.                    <item>
  6239.                
  6240.                <title><![CDATA[Deactivating Business Entities]]></title>
  6241.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/1750#msg-3958</link>
  6242.                <description><![CDATA[Hi, Functionality is implemented in 2023 R1 version.Br,Andrzej]]></description>
  6243.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Andrzej Koń)]]></author>
  6244.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/1750#msg-3958</guid>
  6245.                <pubDate>Tue, 14 Nov 2023 09:06:09 +0100</pubDate>
  6246.                            </item>
  6247.                    <item>
  6248.                
  6249.                <title><![CDATA[Set business entity active for specific application]]></title>
  6250.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/3942#msg-3942</link>
  6251.                <description><![CDATA[Hi, in BPS 2023 you added possibility to mark business entity as active, which is great.What about to go further and add option to assign application to business entity? Adding an application to business entity configuration would result that it will be visible on business entity system field in particular application.There are cases that for some reason in some applications some business entities should stay hidden.Now to achieve it you have to build additional dictionares or small apps.I see this feature as another tab in Business Entity configuration.]]></description>
  6252.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Marek Wołosiewicz)]]></author>
  6253.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/3942#msg-3942</guid>
  6254.                <pubDate>Wed, 08 Nov 2023 21:13:18 +0100</pubDate>
  6255.                            </item>
  6256.                    <item>
  6257.                
  6258.                <title><![CDATA[Prefix &amp; Suffix for Integer numbers]]></title>
  6259.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/3931#msg-3931</link>
  6260.                <description><![CDATA[Hello,lately I&#039;m seeing myself using more often decimal attributes with 0 decimal places, just to get the possibility to set prefix/suffix.It would be great to have this possibility also in integer fields.At this moment there are two options, if we want to be consistent:* ignore that feature, because in integer fields you have to add te suffix/prefix in the name of attribute - it just looks better, when it&#039;s in attribute name everywhere.* overuse of the decimal attributes even for cases, when you need integer - just to have everywhere suffix/prefix in same place.I think it&#039;s rather small change, but it will allow to make forms more unified :)]]></description>
  6261.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Maksymilian Stachowiak)]]></author>
  6262.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/3931#msg-3931</guid>
  6263.                <pubDate>Tue, 07 Nov 2023 15:20:04 +0100</pubDate>
  6264.                            </item>
  6265.                    <item>
  6266.                
  6267.                <title><![CDATA[Update item list on other/parent element]]></title>
  6268.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/3906#msg-3906</link>
  6269.                <description><![CDATA[Hi,It would be helpful if we could update the rows in the parent instance from another instance (child instance). It would be beneficial to be able to update the parent&#039;s itemlist rows when we initiate child instances for each line in the parent&#039;s itemlist.Thanks,Raluca]]></description>
  6270.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Raluca-Mirabela Lupu)]]></author>
  6271.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/3906#msg-3906</guid>
  6272.                <pubDate>Thu, 02 Nov 2023 17:41:02 +0100</pubDate>
  6273.                            </item>
  6274.                    <item>
  6275.                
  6276.                <title><![CDATA[Label in donut chart popup]]></title>
  6277.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/3349#msg-3899</link>
  6278.                <description><![CDATA[Hi,Functionality available in 2023 R2 version.Regards,]]></description>
  6279.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Andrzej Koń)]]></author>
  6280.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/3349#msg-3899</guid>
  6281.                <pubDate>Thu, 02 Nov 2023 09:25:41 +0100</pubDate>
  6282.                            </item>
  6283.                    <item>
  6284.                
  6285.                <title><![CDATA[Always display Download all attachments button]]></title>
  6286.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/3840#msg-3840</link>
  6287.                <description><![CDATA[Hi,it would be great if the &quot;Download all attachments&quot; would always be visible.At the moment it is only visible if:- There are at least two attachments- &quot;Add and edit&quot; is allowed It would be even better if the &quot;Download all attachments&quot;  would reflect the currently displayed attachments.Current, Email or All Attachments.Best regards,Daniel]]></description>
  6288.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Daniel Krüger Cosmo Consult)]]></author>
  6289.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/3840#msg-3840</guid>
  6290.                <pubDate>Fri, 20 Oct 2023 15:31:55 +0200</pubDate>
  6291.                            </item>
  6292.                    <item>
  6293.                
  6294.                <title><![CDATA[WebCon BPS Studio EXE with run parameters - Portal Address and Database]]></title>
  6295.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/3835#msg-3839</link>
  6296.                <description><![CDATA[Hello Daniel, Thank you for quick reply and perfect article - checking it out! :)BR, Dominik]]></description>
  6297.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Dominik Cholewinski)]]></author>
  6298.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/3835#msg-3839</guid>
  6299.                <pubDate>Fri, 20 Oct 2023 15:28:38 +0200</pubDate>
  6300.                            </item>
  6301.                    <item>
  6302.                
  6303.                <title><![CDATA[WebCon BPS Studio EXE with run parameters - Portal Address and Database]]></title>
  6304.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/3835#msg-3838</link>
  6305.                <description><![CDATA[Hi Dominik, this is already possible, at least if you are using the &quot;REST&quot;/remote version of Designer Studio.Here&#039;s an example:&quot;C:\Install\DesignerStudio\2023.1.2.44\app-20231.2.44\WEBCON Designer Studio.exe&quot; -protocol &quot;webcon://https://xxx.cosmocloud.eu/?Context=/db/3/app/9&amp;parameters=&quot;&quot;C:\Install\DesignerStudio\2023.1.2.44\app-20231.2.44\WEBCON Designer Studio.exe&quot; -protocol &quot;webcon://https://xxx.cosmocloud.eu/?Context=/db/1/app/9&amp;parameters=&quot; If someone who is wondering why the path looks &quot;strange&quot;:https://daniels-notes.de/posts/2022/open-designer-studio-in-a-specifc-versionBest regards,Daniel]]></description>
  6306.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Daniel Krüger Cosmo Consult)]]></author>
  6307.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/3835#msg-3838</guid>
  6308.                <pubDate>Fri, 20 Oct 2023 15:25:57 +0200</pubDate>
  6309.                            </item>
  6310.                    <item>
  6311.                
  6312.                <title><![CDATA[Adding option to the process Always import in deployment mode]]></title>
  6313.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/3836#msg-3836</link>
  6314.                <description><![CDATA[Hi,Adding a configuration option to the process for the selected environment, e.g. TEST, &quot;Always import in deployment mode&quot; This will eliminate the mistake of not selecting this option during import and will facilitate the import without searching for and selecting this option.Regards.]]></description>
  6315.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Karol Częczek)]]></author>
  6316.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/3836#msg-3836</guid>
  6317.                <pubDate>Fri, 20 Oct 2023 13:56:14 +0200</pubDate>
  6318.                            </item>
  6319.                    <item>
  6320.                
  6321.                <title><![CDATA[WebCon BPS Studio EXE with run parameters - Portal Address and Database]]></title>
  6322.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/3835#msg-3835</link>
  6323.                <description><![CDATA[Hi, In DEV-TEST-PROD Architecture environment also containing multiple BPS Content Database it would be helpful to runas BPS Studio to the exact environment and exact content database. Then it would be possible to create .bat script to run exact environment, e.g. TEST to the specific database e.g. BPS_Content_1The script &quot;BPS Studio PROD Database 1.bat&quot; could then alike belowrunas /user:Domain\Login &quot;C:\...\WEBCON Designer Studio.exe -portalAddress https://abc.xyz -databaseID or -databaseName&quot; That feature would be helpful :)Best Regards, Dominik]]></description>
  6324.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Dominik Cholewinski)]]></author>
  6325.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/3835#msg-3835</guid>
  6326.                <pubDate>Fri, 20 Oct 2023 13:31:58 +0200</pubDate>
  6327.                            </item>
  6328.                    <item>
  6329.                
  6330.                <title><![CDATA[Datetime field comparision with datetime  issue]]></title>
  6331.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/3743#msg-3775</link>
  6332.                <description><![CDATA[The help you&#039;ve given us is much appreciated. Gentlemen, Mr. Karol Czczek, Mr. Maksymilian StachowiakThe problem seems to have been resolved; I was seemingly missing the WFD_ID  &#039;WFD_ID&#039; part of the formula.Regards,]]></description>
  6333.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (mshahnawaz)]]></author>
  6334.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/3743#msg-3775</guid>
  6335.                <pubDate>Sun, 15 Oct 2023 10:18:37 +0200</pubDate>
  6336.                            </item>
  6337.                    <item>
  6338.                
  6339.                <title><![CDATA[Dashboard - Selected Element Viewer]]></title>
  6340.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/3772#msg-3772</link>
  6341.                <description><![CDATA[Hello everyone,My Tasks is pretty popular view among users at my company, but i&#039;m getting more and more often questions if i could change the way it works.I really like the default feature, and wouldn&#039;t change it, but I&#039;ve an idea that we could have an &#039;Selected Element Viewer&#039; control in the Dashboard.I even prepared some PoC - you can check it out here: https://portal.webconbps.com/db/1/app/479/dashboards/75Selecting item from the report on left, will update the view on the right. Sometimes it requires double click, and side panel to loads so it doesn&#039;t look great.But it represents the idea so for now it&#039;s good enough ;)To make the control work, there should be a possibility to choose which report is source for the view, as there could be many reports on the dashboard.]]></description>
  6342.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Maksymilian Stachowiak)]]></author>
  6343.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/3772#msg-3772</guid>
  6344.                <pubDate>Fri, 13 Oct 2023 15:51:48 +0200</pubDate>
  6345.                            </item>
  6346.                    <item>
  6347.                
  6348.                <title><![CDATA[Datetime field comparision with datetime  issue]]></title>
  6349.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/3743#msg-3756</link>
  6350.                <description><![CDATA[Karol you are right, it seems like cast works with more formats than i thought it would -&gt; https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/sql/t-sql/functions/cast-and-convert-transact-sql?view=sql-server-ver16#date-and-time-stylesSomething new I&#039;ve learned :)]]></description>
  6351.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Maksymilian Stachowiak)]]></author>
  6352.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/3743#msg-3756</guid>
  6353.                <pubDate>Fri, 13 Oct 2023 11:43:32 +0200</pubDate>
  6354.                            </item>
  6355.                    <item>
  6356.                
  6357.                <title><![CDATA[Set Placeholder function]]></title>
  6358.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/3582#msg-3755</link>
  6359.                <description><![CDATA[Sounds like a plan :)]]></description>
  6360.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Adam Hatak)]]></author>
  6361.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/3582#msg-3755</guid>
  6362.                <pubDate>Fri, 13 Oct 2023 11:40:10 +0200</pubDate>
  6363.                            </item>
  6364.                    <item>
  6365.                
  6366.                <title><![CDATA[Datetime field comparision with datetime  issue]]></title>
  6367.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/3743#msg-3753</link>
  6368.                <description><![CDATA[HiThe reason is probably completely different. You haven&#039;t set any message that is returned if the request returns 0, so a system message is returned. that the validation returned 0. And it returned 0 because your query is missing the current element exclusion. The action is performed in the transaction and also &#039;sees&#039; the element you are registering. Add: and WFD_ID  &#039;{WFD_ID}&#039; , and complete the message to be returned in case of failure.Regards]]></description>
  6369.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Karol Częczek)]]></author>
  6370.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/3743#msg-3753</guid>
  6371.                <pubDate>Fri, 13 Oct 2023 11:23:06 +0200</pubDate>
  6372.                            </item>
  6373.                    <item>
  6374.                
  6375.                <title><![CDATA[Set Placeholder function]]></title>
  6376.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/3582#msg-3751</link>
  6377.                <description><![CDATA[Let&#039;s argue high/pro code + no-code = low-code. high/pro code:JavaScript which you can put into a global form rule. No-codeUsing the global form rule.:)]]></description>
  6378.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Daniel Krüger Cosmo Consult)]]></author>
  6379.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/3582#msg-3751</guid>
  6380.                <pubDate>Fri, 13 Oct 2023 09:47:26 +0200</pubDate>
  6381.                            </item>
  6382.                    <item>
  6383.                
  6384.                <title><![CDATA[Datetime field comparision with datetime  issue]]></title>
  6385.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/3743#msg-3750</link>
  6386.                <description><![CDATA[Hi,There should be no need to cast WFD_AttDateTimeX, as this column is defined as datetime in the table.Error comes from the fact, that you are passing value from form, which is not in format, that SQL understands. Instead of using text of form value - choose ISO - it will provide the value in format, that you should be able to convert do datetime (attached screenshot).@editI&#039;ve also noted, that you have hard coded column names WFD_AttDateTime1/2 and WFD_DTYPEID=17 - consider using objects pane, pick values/columns from there, to avoid troubles when importing to new environments. In some cases you might end up with same attribute using different column in each environment.]]></description>
  6387.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Maksymilian Stachowiak)]]></author>
  6388.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/3743#msg-3750</guid>
  6389.                <pubDate>Fri, 13 Oct 2023 09:30:49 +0200</pubDate>
  6390.                            </item>
  6391.                    <item>
  6392.                
  6393.                <title><![CDATA[Adding Romanian as the default language]]></title>
  6394.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/3749#msg-3749</link>
  6395.                <description><![CDATA[Hi,It would be wonderful if you could also introduce Romanian as the default language. It would be of great help to us, and many customers would be grateful.Thanks,Raluca]]></description>
  6396.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Raluca-Mirabela Lupu)]]></author>
  6397.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/3749#msg-3749</guid>
  6398.                <pubDate>Fri, 13 Oct 2023 09:28:22 +0200</pubDate>
  6399.                            </item>
  6400.                    <item>
  6401.                
  6402.                <title><![CDATA[Set Placeholder function]]></title>
  6403.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/3582#msg-3747</link>
  6404.                <description><![CDATA[Dear Daniel, thanks for your response. That doesn&#039;t sound like a low-code :P Anyway thanks for your comment. Until WEBCON implement it (hopefully) I will have to use your solution. Best!]]></description>
  6405.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Adam Hatak)]]></author>
  6406.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/3582#msg-3747</guid>
  6407.                <pubDate>Fri, 13 Oct 2023 09:11:17 +0200</pubDate>
  6408.                            </item>
  6409.                    <item>
  6410.                
  6411.                <title><![CDATA[Datetime field comparision with datetime  issue]]></title>
  6412.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/3743#msg-3745</link>
  6413.                <description><![CDATA[hi,As you suggested , i cast the fields as datetime but still the same issue, please see the attachments.regards,]]></description>
  6414.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (mshahnawaz)]]></author>
  6415.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/3743#msg-3745</guid>
  6416.                <pubDate>Thu, 12 Oct 2023 16:36:22 +0200</pubDate>
  6417.                            </item>
  6418.                    <item>
  6419.                
  6420.                <title><![CDATA[Datetime field comparision with datetime  issue]]></title>
  6421.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/3743#msg-3744</link>
  6422.                <description><![CDATA[HiUse cast as datetime]]></description>
  6423.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Karol Częczek)]]></author>
  6424.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/3743#msg-3744</guid>
  6425.                <pubDate>Thu, 12 Oct 2023 16:14:21 +0200</pubDate>
  6426.                            </item>
  6427.                    <item>
  6428.                
  6429.                <title><![CDATA[Datetime field comparision with datetime  issue]]></title>
  6430.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/3743#msg-3743</link>
  6431.                <description><![CDATA[hiI have datetime type fields i.e From and To , i want to check in  current db table (WFElements), if datetime exist or not between two dates validating on form submit path using sql query.Issue: all the time showing validation error message , My validation Sample below:select  case when (SELECT  count(*)FROM [BPS_Content_Prod].[dbo].[WFElements] where wfd_attchoose1=&#039;{1189}&#039; and  ((&#039;{L:1191}&#039; between WFD_AttDateTime1 and WFD_AttDateTime2) or  (&#039;{L:1190}&#039;  between WFD_AttDateTime1 and WFD_AttDateTime2))  AND WFD_DTYPEID=17) &gt; 0then 0else 1end as testThe above query works well in SQL, but issue on the form submit path.Regards,]]></description>
  6432.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (mshahnawaz)]]></author>
  6433.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/3743#msg-3743</guid>
  6434.                <pubDate>Thu, 12 Oct 2023 15:59:39 +0200</pubDate>
  6435.                            </item>
  6436.                    <item>
  6437.                
  6438.                <title><![CDATA[Enhance date &amp; time picker control - allow entering time in YYYY-MM-DD h:m[m] format - without 0 prefix for hours (and minutes)]]></title>
  6439.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/3511#msg-3738</link>
  6440.                <description><![CDATA[Very good idea. I would add one more enhancement: to be able to insert dates in other formats as well. E.g.: if you write 0112 and pressing tab (or enter) it would automatically switch to 01/12/(current year).]]></description>
  6441.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Martin Meze Freelancer)]]></author>
  6442.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/3511#msg-3738</guid>
  6443.                <pubDate>Thu, 12 Oct 2023 09:30:22 +0200</pubDate>
  6444.                            </item>
  6445.                    <item>
  6446.                
  6447.                <title><![CDATA[knowledge base articles where figures are not correctly displayed]]></title>
  6448.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/3713#msg-3714</link>
  6449.                <description><![CDATA[I con confirm - I&#039;m getting the same result.It seems, like files were deleted (attachment).]]></description>
  6450.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Maksymilian Stachowiak)]]></author>
  6451.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/3713#msg-3714</guid>
  6452.                <pubDate>Wed, 11 Oct 2023 09:42:46 +0200</pubDate>
  6453.                            </item>
  6454.                    <item>
  6455.                
  6456.                <title><![CDATA[knowledge base articles where figures are not correctly displayed]]></title>
  6457.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/3713#msg-3713</link>
  6458.                <description><![CDATA[Hi There are some knowledge base articles where figures are not correctly displayed  e.g.https://community.webcon.com/posts/post/the-picture-form-field/32https://community.webcon.com/posts/post/wfelementdetails-table-description/34and more. Could you please correct it?  I tried various browsers, the results have been the same.]]></description>
  6459.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Ondrej)]]></author>
  6460.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/3713#msg-3713</guid>
  6461.                <pubDate>Wed, 11 Oct 2023 09:13:51 +0200</pubDate>
  6462.                            </item>
  6463.                    <item>
  6464.                
  6465.                <title><![CDATA[Advanced Word generation using Aspose Template syntax]]></title>
  6466.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/3697#msg-3697</link>
  6467.                <description><![CDATA[Hi everyone,the current option to generate word documents with the Word AddIn is great for a lot of use cases. We did a little PoC and we noticed that we could cover even more if there would be a &quot;power user&quot;  option. The generation used the Aspose library which supports a template syntax. This allows to write code inside the word document to generate more sophisticated documents.Examples:- Instead of rendering item list/ data tables as tables in word we could generate &quot;chapters&quot;- Chapters could contain other chapters  - Displaying multi line fields with rich text- Displaying pictures from attachments inside the document- Conditional displaying information inside the document- Using the same template from different sources using data tables.You can find more inspirations here:https://docs.aspose.com/words/net/template-syntax/Feature requests for this new / updated action would be:- Accessing all fields, item lists and data rows/column from the template- Joining multiple documents- Adding watermark- Generation of table of contentBest regards,Daniel]]></description>
  6468.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Daniel Krüger Cosmo Consult)]]></author>
  6469.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/3697#msg-3697</guid>
  6470.                <pubDate>Mon, 09 Oct 2023 16:53:29 +0200</pubDate>
  6471.                            </item>
  6472.                    <item>
  6473.                
  6474.                <title><![CDATA[Blocking access based on login]]></title>
  6475.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/3626#msg-3626</link>
  6476.                <description><![CDATA[Hi,Blocking access based on login.Situation related to last webconaday :).Suddenly, there was a need to block access to the webcon BPS platform for a specific user.The situation was a bit more complicated because the user could not be deactivated at the AD level.Of course, it can be done, but it requires analyzing data, ad groups, places on configuration forms where such a person can be indicated as a functional person, etc.Maybe it would be good to implement the option at the administrative level in the studio to be able to indicate specific logins, maybe ad/bps groups, for which access to the webcon bps portal would be blocked.I think that such a solution would also be advisable for data security reasons, it would make it possible to cut off the user and give him time to make complete changes to the system.On the other hand, it may be worth considering a mechanism that also works the other way round, i.e. access only for defined logins.What I mean here are situations of administrative work, service work, etc.For other logins, a message would be displayed, e.g. no access, service work, or the possibility of defining the message.Regards.]]></description>
  6477.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Karol Częczek)]]></author>
  6478.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/3626#msg-3626</guid>
  6479.                <pubDate>Thu, 28 Sep 2023 08:42:25 +0200</pubDate>
  6480.                            </item>
  6481.                    <item>
  6482.                
  6483.                <title><![CDATA[Set Placeholder function]]></title>
  6484.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/3582#msg-3589</link>
  6485.                <description><![CDATA[Hi Adam,just in case you didn&#039;t solve it yourself. This can be achieved very easy with form rules:1. Create a form rule in JavaScript mode2. Add two parameters and use this code, where you replace the ParameterField, ParameterValue with yoursconsole.log(ParameterField)document.querySelector(&quot;#&quot;+ParameterField.fld +&quot; input&quot;).placeholder = ParameterValue;3. Verify what the console.log line outputs in the developer tools. It may be necessary to modify the &quot;.fld&quot; part in the querySelector line to return &quot;AttText2&quot; or whatevery field you use.4. Remove the console.log line Make use of the form rule.Best regards,Daniel]]></description>
  6486.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Daniel Krüger Cosmo Consult)]]></author>
  6487.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/3582#msg-3589</guid>
  6488.                <pubDate>Sat, 16 Sep 2023 20:08:59 +0200</pubDate>
  6489.                            </item>
  6490.                    <item>
  6491.                
  6492.                <title><![CDATA[Set Placeholder function]]></title>
  6493.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/3582#msg-3582</link>
  6494.                <description><![CDATA[Dear Community, You can set value for empty field (aka. placeholder) in Style and behavior section. Would it be nice if I could enable and set such placeholder value via function (like form rule). As an example, I create a form rule or define actions on change value in field. Changing checkbox field value (as marked, True) I&#039;m setting &quot;mark required&quot; other related field. In such situation I could set placeholder value i.e. &#039;fill this field with phone number&#039; suggestion. Especially it would be useful in Item list. Today I can set row value (in item list) / field value (regular fields) that needs to be replaced by user with proper values. Such placeholder would be a better option to suggest expected content in field(s).Hope this description is quite clear :)Best.]]></description>
  6495.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Adam Hatak)]]></author>
  6496.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/3582#msg-3582</guid>
  6497.                <pubDate>Fri, 15 Sep 2023 09:53:57 +0200</pubDate>
  6498.                            </item>
  6499.                    <item>
  6500.                
  6501.                <title><![CDATA[Minimize form rules ; Reducing HTTP response size part 3]]></title>
  6502.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/3552#msg-3552</link>
  6503.                <description><![CDATA[Hi,it would be great when form rules would be stored in a minimized version too. This minimized version would be used by default whenever a form rule is send to the client in a HTTP response. When a query parameter like &#039;minimized=0&#039; is added, the &quot;full&quot; version would be used instead.Currently the a JavaScript form rule will be bloated because line breaks are transferred as \r\n. Depending on the number of line breaks and form rules you are using, this sums up.Best regards,Daniel]]></description>
  6504.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Daniel Krüger Cosmo Consult)]]></author>
  6505.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/3552#msg-3552</guid>
  6506.                <pubDate>Thu, 07 Sep 2023 21:50:32 +0200</pubDate>
  6507.                            </item>
  6508.                    <item>
  6509.                
  6510.                <title><![CDATA[Transfer only referenced form rules; Reducing HTTP response size part 2]]></title>
  6511.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/3548#msg-3548</link>
  6512.                <description><![CDATA[Hi, the HTTP response for displaying a workflow instance contains all global form rules.It&#039;s ignored which kind of form rules are used by the process/element. The response should only contain those form rules which are referenced.  After all, the exported process will also export the used/referenced global form rules and not  all.This applies at least to versions 2023.1.2.44 and 2022.1.4.155.Moving these form rules out of the HTTP response for each element would have an even bigger impact. Although I have to admit, that I have no idea how new versions of form rules would &#039;update&#039; the old version on the browser.Best regards Daniel]]></description>
  6513.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Daniel Krüger Cosmo Consult)]]></author>
  6514.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/3548#msg-3548</guid>
  6515.                <pubDate>Wed, 06 Sep 2023 23:10:20 +0200</pubDate>
  6516.                            </item>
  6517.                    <item>
  6518.                
  6519.                <title><![CDATA[New branch level for actions on Task triggered level]]></title>
  6520.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/3546#msg-3546</link>
  6521.                <description><![CDATA[Hello, Introduction: 1. right now WebCon BPS allows to configure actions which triggers on path, on exit, on entry (and of course on a few more)2. sometimes process is configured to assign the task to multiple users, e.g. multi-approval (without subprocesses), e.g. assign tasks to 3 users3. again sometimes business  got the need that after every approval (finalizing single task) they would like to trigger some action, e.g. email after every single approval. in that case business desires 3 emails, 1 after every single approval4. right now it is not possible to configure action on something alike &quot;Task finalized&quot; or &quot;Task triggered&quot;If we configure it on exit then only one email after the final (3rd in above case) approvalIt would be great to have additional branch in BPS Studio to trigger action, e.g. email on every single task finalization - task.png. The condition could be related e.g. to Path, then we got full flexibility also to trigger action only &quot;on singlle task finalized&quot; only when e.g. path is approve or reject.BR, Dominik]]></description>
  6522.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Dominik Cholewinski)]]></author>
  6523.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/3546#msg-3546</guid>
  6524.                <pubDate>Wed, 06 Sep 2023 14:19:46 +0200</pubDate>
  6525.                            </item>
  6526.                    <item>
  6527.                
  6528.                <title><![CDATA[Add possibility to configure application availability/visibility in WebCon BPS Mobile Application]]></title>
  6529.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/3545#msg-3545</link>
  6530.                <description><![CDATA[Hello, It would be great if WebCon BPS could allow to configure application available only &quot;via Browser&quot;, not visibible in WebCon BPS Application (for Android/IPhone) at all. Configuration could be on Application level via e.g. 2 checkboxes: &quot;Visible in Anroid App&quot; / &quot;Visible in IPhone App&quot;. That solution would enhance Mobile user experience not be overhelmed via full list of application which e.g. mostly could not be foreseen/designed from form/dashboard level  as Mobile optimized. Best Regards, Dominik]]></description>
  6531.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Dominik Cholewinski)]]></author>
  6532.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/3545#msg-3545</guid>
  6533.                <pubDate>Wed, 06 Sep 2023 14:11:43 +0200</pubDate>
  6534.                            </item>
  6535.                    <item>
  6536.                
  6537.                <title><![CDATA[Bulk Edit of Action Parameters]]></title>
  6538.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/3538#msg-3538</link>
  6539.                <description><![CDATA[Hello,I&#039;ve spend today over an hour copy/pasting data between notepad and webcon into run subworkflo action configs.In my use case - i have to start 1-10 subworkflows (each having different start condition), with different workflows, and forms, but with partially shared attributes (marked blue).I&#039;m configuring actions in new process, so i&#039;ve copied them from existing process, to avoid refilling data about workflow/form/path etc, as those are same, but I had to change attributes (different process)It would be great to have Bulk Edit possibility like in Postman (https://i.postimg.cc/nh60WG6d/Postman.gif), to just copy/paste multiplle fields at once (maybe only in advanced editor mode) - updating them row by row have been tedious.]]></description>
  6540.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Maksymilian Stachowiak)]]></author>
  6541.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/3538#msg-3538</guid>
  6542.                <pubDate>Tue, 05 Sep 2023 14:46:12 +0200</pubDate>
  6543.                            </item>
  6544.                    <item>
  6545.                
  6546.                <title><![CDATA[WEBCON BPS System administrations: Add display name field]]></title>
  6547.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/3530#msg-3530</link>
  6548.                <description><![CDATA[Hi,could you please extend the &quot;WEBCON BPS System administrators&quot;  tool (exe), with a required field for the display name in addition to the BPS ID?I  just spend about three hours hunting down the exception:Unable to cast object of type &#039;System.DBNull&#039; to type &#039;System.String&#039;at WebCon.WorkFlow.BusinessLogic.ElementManagement.Checkouts.ElementCheckoutsRepository.UpdateOrTakeOverParameters.UpdateAfterUpdateTimeBest regards,Daniel]]></description>
  6549.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Daniel Krüger Cosmo Consult)]]></author>
  6550.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/3530#msg-3530</guid>
  6551.                <pubDate>Fri, 01 Sep 2023 16:24:23 +0200</pubDate>
  6552.                            </item>
  6553.                    <item>
  6554.                
  6555.                <title><![CDATA[Don&#039;t display warning can not test business rule for item list for Show]]></title>
  6556.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/3149#msg-3529</link>
  6557.                <description><![CDATA[Still exists in R2. I hope that this get&#039;s fixed it&#039;s a pain....]]></description>
  6558.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Daniel Krüger Cosmo Consult)]]></author>
  6559.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/3149#msg-3529</guid>
  6560.                <pubDate>Fri, 01 Sep 2023 11:32:36 +0200</pubDate>
  6561.                            </item>
  6562.                    <item>
  6563.                
  6564.                <title><![CDATA[Removing default values; Reducing HTTP response size part 1]]></title>
  6565.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/3527#msg-3527</link>
  6566.                <description><![CDATA[Hi everyone, we had some racing conditions, when the users switched fast between instances in the task view or previews in reports.This was caused by form rules which used G_ variables which were no longer available, the view/desktop endpoint hadn&#039;t send a response yet but a JavaScript form rule from the previous instance was still executing.While coping with this I noticed that the response are quite big (1). About 50% of the 418 kb is the value of the jsToRegister property.Maybe we can do something about his our selves by providing a minified version of the JS. Nevertheless I wonder whether it would be an option to remove any default values from the response and enrich the created objects with the default values, if this is not part of the response. There are probably classes used for each so, it probably wouldn&#039;t have a real impact on the client.In my case I removed the below default strings which reduced the compressed JSON length from 424722 (2) to 401807 (4) using a &quot;pretty printed&quot; version this reduced the length from 549913 (3) to 508477 (5)Best regards,Daniel&quot;indicator&quot;: false,&quot;percent&quot;: false&quot;autocompleteMoreResultsCount&quot;: 100,&quot;hasRequirednessDependencies&quot;: false,&quot;isDisabled&quot;: false,&quot;regexValidation&quot;: null,&quot;isTechnical&quot;: false,&quot;controlStyle&quot;: &quot;&quot;,&quot;labelStyle&quot;: &quot;&quot;,&quot;plugin&quot;: null,&quot;htmlInputAttributes&quot;: null,&quot;htmlInputPlaceholder&quot;: &quot;&quot;,&quot;showQrButton&quot;: false&quot;description&quot;: {&quot;original&quot;: &quot;&quot;, &quot;translated&quot;: &quot;&quot;, &quot;translations&quot;: []}, &quot;documentation&quot;: {&quot;original&quot;: null, &quot;translated&quot;: &quot;&quot;, &quot;translations&quot;: []},&quot;postbackOnChange&quot;: false, &quot;allowAddingCustomValue&quot;: false,&quot;allowMultiValue&quot;: false,&quot;autocompleteFirstResultsCount&quot;: 5,&quot;autocompleteSearchChars&quot;: 3,&quot;enableFieldsOnModeChange&quot;: false,&quot;javaScriptOnModeChange&quot;: &quot;&quot;,&quot;incudeTimeZone&quot;: false&quot;includeTime&quot;: false,]]></description>
  6567.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Daniel Krüger Cosmo Consult)]]></author>
  6568.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/3527#msg-3527</guid>
  6569.                <pubDate>Wed, 30 Aug 2023 23:13:32 +0200</pubDate>
  6570.                            </item>
  6571.                    <item>
  6572.                
  6573.                <title><![CDATA[Encrypted fields]]></title>
  6574.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/75#msg-3526</link>
  6575.                <description><![CDATA[Just in case someone find&#039;s this post. I&#039;ve created a PoC. You could modify it to implement your personal solution fulfilling all your requirements.https://daniels-notes.de/posts/2023/password-field]]></description>
  6576.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Daniel Krüger Cosmo Consult)]]></author>
  6577.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/75#msg-3526</guid>
  6578.                <pubDate>Wed, 30 Aug 2023 22:26:30 +0200</pubDate>
  6579.                            </item>
  6580.                    <item>
  6581.                
  6582.                <title><![CDATA[Add possibility to view members of the WebCon BPS Group to the users without Admin/Group Owner Permissions]]></title>
  6583.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/3512#msg-3512</link>
  6584.                <description><![CDATA[Hello, Introducting roles for managing BPS Groups: Global Permission Admin and per Group Admins it would be helpful to have feature to view the group members for every/configured users. It would be indicated per group - alike in SharePoint if group members can be shown to everyone or only group members - SharePoint.png (missing and desired feature marked blue)This feature with the links to the BPS groups described here + stopped working in BPS 2023 - hopefully they functionality will be back :) would allow to have a glance at groups and their members from one place. Best Regards, Dominik]]></description>
  6585.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Dominik Cholewinski)]]></author>
  6586.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/3512#msg-3512</guid>
  6587.                <pubDate>Fri, 25 Aug 2023 11:18:47 +0200</pubDate>
  6588.                            </item>
  6589.                    <item>
  6590.                
  6591.                <title><![CDATA[Enhance date &amp; time picker control - allow entering time in YYYY-MM-DD h:m[m] format - without 0 prefix for hours (and minutes)]]></title>
  6592.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/3511#msg-3511</link>
  6593.                <description><![CDATA[Hello, Right now when selecting the date for date&amp;time picker system by default setup the time for 00:00. If we want to change the time e.g. to 7:00 and double click the &quot;00&quot;, enter &quot;7&quot; system says that format date is inpropper. We have to add 0 prefix to hour &quot;7&quot;, so it is &quot;07&quot;. It is one more click + one more typing. Allowing format h:mm or even h:m would be ergonomy enhancement for faster entering the date &amp; time data :)Best Regards, Dominik]]></description>
  6594.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Dominik Cholewinski)]]></author>
  6595.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/3511#msg-3511</guid>
  6596.                <pubDate>Fri, 25 Aug 2023 11:09:32 +0200</pubDate>
  6597.                            </item>
  6598.                    <item>
  6599.                
  6600.                <title><![CDATA[AAD: People with/out  external user selection]]></title>
  6601.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/3488#msg-3488</link>
  6602.                <description><![CDATA[Hi, in an Azure Active Directory environment it would be great to add an option to the people field which would configure it, whether external /guest users are selectable at all. Default value should be false. A customer worked around this by limiting the selection to a BPS group and adding AAD Groups as members of the group. No external user was a member of the AAD group.Technically this worked fine, but it turned out, that the performance was effected dramatically.Selecting a users took now multiple seconds. You can see that there are three calls for the people field &quot;Responsible&quot; which took in total about 5 seconds. I worked around this by creating an SQL data source, which made the form usable again. In the screenshot the &quot;Owner&quot; field uses the sql datasource.The drawback this has is, that it&#039;s no longer a people field and everywhere I have to select the column containing the account name now. Which his not necessary for a people field and can easily be forgotten.Best regards,Daniel]]></description>
  6603.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Daniel Krüger Cosmo Consult)]]></author>
  6604.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/3488#msg-3488</guid>
  6605.                <pubDate>Tue, 22 Aug 2023 16:57:53 +0200</pubDate>
  6606.                            </item>
  6607.                    <item>
  6608.                
  6609.                <title><![CDATA[API enhancement: Distinguish own and related processes]]></title>
  6610.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/3462#msg-3462</link>
  6611.                <description><![CDATA[Hi,the API endpoint returns a list of all processes inside a appliation./api/data/v5.0/db/{dbId}/applications/{idguid}/processesIt would be great, if the result would contain a property to check, whether a process in the result is only a relation.{  &quot;processes&quot;: [    {      &quot;id&quot;: 0,      &quot;guid&quot;: &quot;string&quot;,      &quot;name&quot;: &quot;string&quot;,&gt;&gt; &quot;isRelation&quot;: &quot;boolean&quot; ]]></description>
  6612.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Daniel Krüger Cosmo Consult)]]></author>
  6613.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/3462#msg-3462</guid>
  6614.                <pubDate>Tue, 15 Aug 2023 10:30:46 +0200</pubDate>
  6615.                            </item>
  6616.                    <item>
  6617.                
  6618.                <title><![CDATA[Field type Percent Data Row]]></title>
  6619.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/3458#msg-3458</link>
  6620.                <description><![CDATA[Hi,I think it would be helpful if the data row field, when set to the percentage type, also displayed negative percentages when selected. This would be highly beneficial for various processes, especially when we want to track project progress or profitability. Currently, if we have negative percentages, it shows as 0. I believe negative percentages could be highlighted with a different color.Thanks,Raluca]]></description>
  6621.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Raluca-Mirabela Lupu)]]></author>
  6622.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/3458#msg-3458</guid>
  6623.                <pubDate>Fri, 11 Aug 2023 14:22:00 +0200</pubDate>
  6624.                            </item>
  6625.                    <item>
  6626.                
  6627.                <title><![CDATA[Designer Desk - Clone project]]></title>
  6628.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/3426#msg-3455</link>
  6629.                <description><![CDATA[Hi,This would definitely be a good idea. If you could regenerate the prototype documentation after we have already published to the Designer Studio and the customer wants a change, it would be nice to modify the same process. I understand that there might be inconsistencies between the Designer Desk and Designer Studio, but it would still be helpful for the business analytics phase.Thanks,Raluca]]></description>
  6630.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Raluca-Mirabela Lupu)]]></author>
  6631.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/3426#msg-3455</guid>
  6632.                <pubDate>Fri, 11 Aug 2023 11:45:48 +0200</pubDate>
  6633.                            </item>
  6634.                    <item>
  6635.                
  6636.                <title><![CDATA[Designer Desk - Clone project]]></title>
  6637.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/3426#msg-3426</link>
  6638.                <description><![CDATA[Hello! I think it would be a really good idea to be able to copy projects within Designer Desk. Currently, after exporting a project to Designer Studio, we lose all the work that could be used in the future.]]></description>
  6639.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Jarosław Skrypak)]]></author>
  6640.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/3426#msg-3426</guid>
  6641.                <pubDate>Wed, 09 Aug 2023 11:08:15 +0200</pubDate>
  6642.                            </item>
  6643.                    <item>
  6644.                
  6645.                <title><![CDATA[Tagging people in comments]]></title>
  6646.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/3170#msg-3425</link>
  6647.                <description><![CDATA[It was me asking this question during the Webinar :)]]></description>
  6648.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Jarosław Skrypak)]]></author>
  6649.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/3170#msg-3425</guid>
  6650.                <pubDate>Wed, 09 Aug 2023 11:04:30 +0200</pubDate>
  6651.                            </item>
  6652.                    <item>
  6653.                
  6654.                <title><![CDATA[Enhancing Form Customization in Webcon: Visualizing  Modifications Break Settings Inheritance in Step]]></title>
  6655.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/3411#msg-3413</link>
  6656.                <description><![CDATA[Hi,This would be great. I would also add something: when in the Forms tab, if fields had been moved to a different position they should be highlighted somehow.I am not sure how this could be best done, if in the same Main form tab or a new tab, but I can see how this would help specifically when working with lots of Item lists on the same step.Regards,George]]></description>
  6657.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (George Munteanu)]]></author>
  6658.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/3411#msg-3413</guid>
  6659.                <pubDate>Fri, 04 Aug 2023 11:40:27 +0200</pubDate>
  6660.                            </item>
  6661.                    <item>
  6662.                
  6663.                <title><![CDATA[Enhancing Form Customization in Webcon: Visualizing  Modifications Break Settings Inheritance in Step]]></title>
  6664.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/3411#msg-3411</link>
  6665.                <description><![CDATA[Hi,In Webcon, it is possible to make modifications to the form at the step level. When the &quot;break settings inheritance&quot; option is activated, these modifications apply only to that specific step.For a more visual experience, it would be nice to highlight these steps in the flow, similar to how steps containing &quot;on entry&quot; or &quot;on exit&quot; actions are highlighted.Thanks,Raluca]]></description>
  6666.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Raluca-Mirabela Lupu)]]></author>
  6667.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/3411#msg-3411</guid>
  6668.                <pubDate>Fri, 04 Aug 2023 10:59:52 +0200</pubDate>
  6669.                            </item>
  6670.                    <item>
  6671.                
  6672.                <title><![CDATA[SQL Server compatibility level]]></title>
  6673.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/3401#msg-3405</link>
  6674.                <description><![CDATA[I would be fine with an overview which WEBCON BPS versions support which compatibility level. Since SQL Server 2014 will be supported for one more year, I doubt that the default setting will be changed. After all not all customers use the latest version. Of course it would be nice, if the latest supported version for the specific server would be set, but I could do it myself, if I would have the information. :)]]></description>
  6675.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Daniel Krüger Cosmo Consult)]]></author>
  6676.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/3401#msg-3405</guid>
  6677.                <pubDate>Wed, 02 Aug 2023 13:18:00 +0200</pubDate>
  6678.                            </item>
  6679.                    <item>
  6680.                
  6681.                <title><![CDATA[SQL Server compatibility level]]></title>
  6682.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/3401#msg-3403</link>
  6683.                <description><![CDATA[Would be great to have it!I can&#039;t count how many times i&#039;ve bounced off the wall with the string_split :)]]></description>
  6684.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Maksymilian Stachowiak)]]></author>
  6685.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/3401#msg-3403</guid>
  6686.                <pubDate>Wed, 02 Aug 2023 12:33:39 +0200</pubDate>
  6687.                            </item>
  6688.                    <item>
  6689.                
  6690.                <title><![CDATA[SQL Server compatibility level]]></title>
  6691.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/3401#msg-3401</link>
  6692.                <description><![CDATA[HI,When installing Webcon, the SQL Server compatibility level is set to 120 (default).To use advanced functions like `string_split` and data processing functions from JSON, it is necessary to manually change the compatibility level to 150.These functions are essential in developing more complex processes.If we manually upgrade the compatibility level from 120 to 150, Webcon will no longer provide support.It would be beneficial to have the compatibility level pre-set to 150 during the installation of Webcon.Thanks,Raluca]]></description>
  6693.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Raluca-Mirabela Lupu)]]></author>
  6694.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/3401#msg-3401</guid>
  6695.                <pubDate>Wed, 02 Aug 2023 11:09:40 +0200</pubDate>
  6696.                            </item>
  6697.                    <item>
  6698.                
  6699.                <title><![CDATA[Calendar report coloring]]></title>
  6700.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/3365#msg-3365</link>
  6701.                <description><![CDATA[Hi everyone,I&#039;ve been working on a &quot;to do&quot; app and I thought that a calendar report view showing the tasks to be dane with their date would be perfect. In the calculated columns of my standard table report I have a calculated column with a red square for an overdue task and green for all the &quot;to be done n the future&quot; ones. Works great. I created the same for the calendar report and there is a problem - the calculated column is not visible to choose from in the dynamic coloring module (only system and process iems are visible there).  This seems to be something that should be there, but was somehow forgotten. Calculated values make no sense in the calendar reports now If they can not be chosen in any dialog, especially for coloring. Has anyone came accross this problem? Can it be overcome somehow?]]></description>
  6702.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Michał Ludwiczak)]]></author>
  6703.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/3365#msg-3365</guid>
  6704.                <pubDate>Fri, 28 Jul 2023 10:54:03 +0200</pubDate>
  6705.                            </item>
  6706.                    <item>
  6707.                
  6708.                <title><![CDATA[Generating documentation]]></title>
  6709.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/3354#msg-3354</link>
  6710.                <description><![CDATA[When generating documentation for standard areas, such as form type or workflow, it would be good if the content was automatically substituted there, I don&#039;t know exactly what, but generally describing what the form type is, what workflow is. Or for such standard content to appear immediately in the documentation section after adding a new workflow, process, form type, etc. with the possibility of changing, of course, entering your description.Another idea is that when generating the documentation, you can select the type option, &#039;Fill in the blanks in the documentation: attribute name, path, etc.Then if the documentation section for an attribute, path, action, etc. will not be completed in the studio, the name of the object will be overwritten.]]></description>
  6711.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Karol Częczek)]]></author>
  6712.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/3354#msg-3354</guid>
  6713.                <pubDate>Thu, 27 Jul 2023 16:57:01 +0200</pubDate>
  6714.                            </item>
  6715.                    <item>
  6716.                
  6717.                <title><![CDATA[Label in donut chart popup]]></title>
  6718.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/3349#msg-3349</link>
  6719.                <description><![CDATA[Hello, it would be nice to have in donut and pie charts &quot;category&quot; label in popup that matches the legend (beside series name).With a large number of categories, it is difficult to distinguish colors on chart and popup contains only series name. The label was displayed in the 2021 versions and is still displayed in bar chart.Please consider adding it.]]></description>
  6720.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Jacek)]]></author>
  6721.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/3349#msg-3349</guid>
  6722.                <pubDate>Thu, 27 Jul 2023 14:59:13 +0200</pubDate>
  6723.                            </item>
  6724.                    <item>
  6725.                
  6726.                <title><![CDATA[Groups used in WebCon BPS Applications - Permission Dashboard. Automatic Dashboard could be helpful]]></title>
  6727.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/3344#msg-3344</link>
  6728.                <description><![CDATA[Every WebCon BPS Applications needs permissions to work properly. Of course best practices is to use groups: WebCon BPS, Active Directory, SharePoint ones. It is worth to some have naming convention for them. It is also crucial to know which are used within the specific Application. We can dig into the BPS Studio and check Application, Process, Worfklow, Document Types permissions. We can check actions, business rules, etc. We can try to do it better via SQL or/and WebCon BPS Application. It is well described here: https://community.webcon.com/posts/post/checking-user-and-group-privileges/258/3Sometimes we need to use groups which are cross Applications, cross company alike Board Members, HR Department. Sometimes we need to use Active Directory groups (not WebCon BPS ones) to give some permissions to Microsoft Reporting Services report or some fileshare. For us it was important to document all permissions connected with each Application. Above SQLing is a good basis for input as basis for something we called &quot;Group Management Dashboard&quot; - the dashboard with the information (and links which worked in former BPS version - 2021). Please notice the screenshot attached - it gives an overview how it is done :)Such dashboard contains information about Permissions/Groups used directly in WebCon BPS Application: application, process, doc types, workflow, business rules, actions. About the per application groups, about groups shared between multiple applications, about external groups used in the process, e.g. fileshares, reporting services. Such attitute with planned update to WebCon BPS 2023 (Global Role for Group Management  and per Group Admin) gives as opportunity to give the &quot;Power&quot; of managing permissions by Buisness (Self-Service by Business Admins). We wanted to achive the idea which we had followed in SharePoint (business is maintaining adding/removing users from the groups). And such dashboard is powerfull tool - the Permission Admin per Application can jump from one Dashboard to DEV/TEST/PROD groups from one place. Please notice the screenshot attached - it gives an overview how it is done :)* Of course behind the scenes there is a lot of technical fun :) E.g. Prefix to group links is taken taken from configuration (via WebCon BPS REST API) so every time we had to change the WEbCon BPS Portal address we just changed portal address in one place. Please notice the screenshot attached - it gives an overview how it is done :)BPS 2023+It would be perfect if such an overview could be added out-of-the-box (e.g. such dashboard) of the groups (at least the ones directly used which can be SQLed from Database) - alike in the kb article by Mr. Baszak :)https://community.webcon.com/posts/post/checking-user-and-group-privileges/258/3]]></description>
  6729.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Dominik Cholewinski)]]></author>
  6730.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/3344#msg-3344</guid>
  6731.                <pubDate>Wed, 26 Jul 2023 16:16:54 +0200</pubDate>
  6732.                            </item>
  6733.                    <item>
  6734.                
  6735.                <title><![CDATA[Simplified history control on the form (dynamically read from SQL)]]></title>
  6736.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/3332#msg-3332</link>
  6737.                <description><![CDATA[IntroductionI have heared that basically planning is always about three questions (three columns in Excel, three attributes on the form) - WHAT? WHO? WHEN? :)Sometimes we need an extra information/column - we can call it &quot;Remarks&quot;, &quot;Others&quot; or .... COMMENT...WebCon BPS has extraordinary feature available out-of-the box without even single line of code...VERSIONING and detailed HISTORY.Such feature is really needed for admins/troubleshooting and for business analysis for single &quot;cases&quot; of the flow. Business (and sometimes IT) also needs a brief overview, visible at glance about WHO did WHAT (and WHEN) with some optional COMMENT - alike in mentioned planning. What if we got simple overview on the form for free? If you would like to see how it could look live - please go to the screensot Simplified history.pngCoreSuch simple history on the form - WHO clicked WHAT and WHEN is part of our Internal Company WebCon BPS Guidelines. We put in on the every form in the processes. Is it for FREE? :) Yes, it is if you like SQLing :) Like we said WebCon BPS platform has got full history in the SQL and in history view (detailed one). Custom SQL taking data from WebCon BPS SQL databases can give you such SIMPLE overview on the form. It is also configurable - with subworkflows or not, which columns, etc. BUT basic version is about WHO clicked WHAT (and WHEN) in the process. What is also CRUCIAL...such solution MERGES ACTIONS and COMMENTs on one list in chronological order - you got one place when you read history of actions with comments SORTED by time. You do not have to jump from history into comments and have a look on action times from 2 PLACES. You got one PLACE to RULE them ALL - historical entries.Sounds cool? :) For OUR Business yes, me either :)BPS 2023+Such simplfied history has got huge potential from Business perspective and could be really nice out-of-the-box for FREE without any custom single SQL  :)]]></description>
  6738.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Dominik Cholewinski)]]></author>
  6739.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/3332#msg-3332</guid>
  6740.                <pubDate>Mon, 24 Jul 2023 15:47:41 +0200</pubDate>
  6741.                            </item>
  6742.                    <item>
  6743.                
  6744.                <title><![CDATA[Optional icons for paths]]></title>
  6745.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/3143#msg-3320</link>
  6746.                <description><![CDATA[There are reasons why established ERP systems dont come with an app with few fields and two buttons. :)]]></description>
  6747.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Daniel Krüger Cosmo Consult)]]></author>
  6748.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/3143#msg-3320</guid>
  6749.                <pubDate>Fri, 21 Jul 2023 18:44:00 +0200</pubDate>
  6750.                            </item>
  6751.                    <item>
  6752.                
  6753.                <title><![CDATA[Optional icons for paths]]></title>
  6754.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/3143#msg-3315</link>
  6755.                <description><![CDATA[As one of my UI/UX teachers used to say, if a design needs words to explain itself, then it is a bad design. :)) Quite hard to apply that in such high level applications though. :P]]></description>
  6756.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Razvan Ogrezeanu - ENCORSA Romania)]]></author>
  6757.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/3143#msg-3315</guid>
  6758.                <pubDate>Fri, 21 Jul 2023 14:34:04 +0200</pubDate>
  6759.                            </item>
  6760.                    <item>
  6761.                
  6762.                <title><![CDATA[Different color for path false in automation]]></title>
  6763.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/3269#msg-3269</link>
  6764.                <description><![CDATA[Hi.It would be good to use a different color if the condition for performing the operation passed the path false, in the action log.If the operation is performed for a large number of elements, checking the log would be much easier and clearer.]]></description>
  6765.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Karol Częczek)]]></author>
  6766.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/3269#msg-3269</guid>
  6767.                <pubDate>Mon, 17 Jul 2023 14:33:01 +0200</pubDate>
  6768.                            </item>
  6769.                    <item>
  6770.                
  6771.                <title><![CDATA[Autocomplete field type - Case (in)sensitive]]></title>
  6772.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/3213#msg-3220</link>
  6773.                <description><![CDATA[Dear Daniel,thanks a lot for your advise. It looks like, you are right. The primary source (db) is configured case sensitive. To be honest, I have never have heard about such options on DB level, but I am also no BD admin :)In my case, I will try to change the settings and test it again.Thank youBest regardsThomas]]></description>
  6774.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Thomas Dengler)]]></author>
  6775.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/3213#msg-3220</guid>
  6776.                <pubDate>Tue, 04 Jul 2023 08:47:51 +0200</pubDate>
  6777.                            </item>
  6778.                    <item>
  6779.                
  6780.                <title><![CDATA[Autocomplete field type - Case (in)sensitive]]></title>
  6781.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/3213#msg-3215</link>
  6782.                <description><![CDATA[Hi Thomas,I can&#039;t remember any case, where it was case insensitive. I just checked it again and it works fine.Maybe your data source is a database with a case sensitive collation?In this case you could add a view change the collation of the fields and use this view. Maybe you need to put the view also in a  database with insensitive collation. If you need to go down this road, you could also add another column, where you remove the white space using sql functions. In the advanced configuration you would tick &quot;searching&quot; but wouldn&#039;t display it.Best regards,Daniel]]></description>
  6783.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Daniel Krüger Cosmo Consult)]]></author>
  6784.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/3213#msg-3215</guid>
  6785.                <pubDate>Mon, 03 Jul 2023 16:43:15 +0200</pubDate>
  6786.                            </item>
  6787.                    <item>
  6788.                
  6789.                <title><![CDATA[Autocomplete field type - Case (in)sensitive]]></title>
  6790.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/3213#msg-3213</link>
  6791.                <description><![CDATA[Dear all,I am wondering if there is no option for a case-insensitive search for fieldtypes like &quot;Autocomplete&quot; or &quot;Choice field&quot;.At the moment I am struggling to search for values with search mode &quot;Contains&quot;. Unfortunately the search results differs based on beginning the search phrase with an upper or lower case.In my opinion it would be a great benefit, if there are two addtional options (as checkboxes) to fine tune the search mode.1) Ignore Upper and lower case --&gt; case-insensitive2) Ignore WhitespacesIf anyone knows an easy approach to achieve such a behavior in another way, I would look forward to get the information.I think it has to be implemented in webcon.Thanks a lotBest regardsThomas]]></description>
  6792.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Thomas Dengler)]]></author>
  6793.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/3213#msg-3213</guid>
  6794.                <pubDate>Mon, 03 Jul 2023 15:54:33 +0200</pubDate>
  6795.                            </item>
  6796.                    <item>
  6797.                
  6798.                <title><![CDATA[Datasource response: Option to download the response]]></title>
  6799.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/3199#msg-3199</link>
  6800.                <description><![CDATA[Hi,it would be great if the response tab of a data source would have an additional option to download the defined response structure so that it could be uploaded. This would be even better, when the internal names would be part of the download. There are cases when you need to change the internal names and doing this again and again for the superior source and x business entity sources is annoying. :)Best regards,Daniel]]></description>
  6801.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Daniel Krüger Cosmo Consult)]]></author>
  6802.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/3199#msg-3199</guid>
  6803.                <pubDate>Thu, 29 Jun 2023 22:28:13 +0200</pubDate>
  6804.                            </item>
  6805.                    <item>
  6806.                
  6807.                <title><![CDATA[Tagging people in comments]]></title>
  6808.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/3170#msg-3190</link>
  6809.                <description><![CDATA[I have in mind, that this or similar topic regarding &quot;tagging&quot; was asked during the questions part of the WEBCON BPS 2023 - Whats New webinar. But I don&#039;t remember the answer, I think it was something along the lines, that WEBCON did look into it, but didn&#039;t see an option to make this happen at this point in time.Unfortunately the on demand webinar doesn&#039;t contain the questions.https://webcon.com/webcon-bps-2023-whats-new-on-demand/]]></description>
  6810.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Daniel Krüger Cosmo Consult)]]></author>
  6811.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/3170#msg-3190</guid>
  6812.                <pubDate>Mon, 26 Jun 2023 22:18:48 +0200</pubDate>
  6813.                            </item>
  6814.                    <item>
  6815.                
  6816.                <title><![CDATA[Tagging people in comments]]></title>
  6817.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/3170#msg-3189</link>
  6818.                <description><![CDATA[This would be extremely useful! Thanks for the Idea!]]></description>
  6819.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Christian Amler)]]></author>
  6820.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/3170#msg-3189</guid>
  6821.                <pubDate>Mon, 26 Jun 2023 09:52:59 +0200</pubDate>
  6822.                            </item>
  6823.                    <item>
  6824.                
  6825.                <title><![CDATA[Tagging people in comments]]></title>
  6826.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/3170#msg-3170</link>
  6827.                <description><![CDATA[I believe it would be useful to allow &quot;tagging&quot; people (example - @jaroslaw) in comments section. After such a mention, the person would get a notification with a link to the workflow. What do you think?]]></description>
  6828.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Jarosław Skrypak)]]></author>
  6829.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/3170#msg-3170</guid>
  6830.                <pubDate>Wed, 21 Jun 2023 12:07:52 +0200</pubDate>
  6831.                            </item>
  6832.                    <item>
  6833.                
  6834.                <title><![CDATA[Don&#039;t display warning can not test business rule for item list for Show]]></title>
  6835.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/3149#msg-3149</link>
  6836.                <description><![CDATA[Hi,it would be great if the error message :It is not possible to test a source or business rule that contains columns of an item list.Would only be displayed for the test button of the expression editor. Currently it&#039;s also displayed for the &quot;Show&quot; buttons which forces me to replace the variable in the SQL management studio myself.Best regards,Daniel]]></description>
  6837.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Daniel Krüger Cosmo Consult)]]></author>
  6838.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/3149#msg-3149</guid>
  6839.                <pubDate>Tue, 13 Jun 2023 12:48:05 +0200</pubDate>
  6840.                            </item>
  6841.                    <item>
  6842.                
  6843.                <title><![CDATA[Optional icons for paths]]></title>
  6844.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/3143#msg-3143</link>
  6845.                <description><![CDATA[Hi everyone,I&#039;m not sure yet whether it&#039;s a good idea or not, but I think it might proof useful, if we could add an icon to path buttons, like they are available for the menu buttons.I just tried emojis today and I think it will help users to distinguish similar paths. But since these are emojis there may be problems with light/dark mode and different devices. This wouldn&#039;t be the case for font icons.Best regards,Daniel]]></description>
  6846.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Daniel Krüger Cosmo Consult)]]></author>
  6847.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/3143#msg-3143</guid>
  6848.                <pubDate>Fri, 09 Jun 2023 14:09:08 +0200</pubDate>
  6849.                            </item>
  6850.                    <item>
  6851.                
  6852.                <title><![CDATA[Update Autenti SDK for Webcon 2023]]></title>
  6853.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/3074#msg-3138</link>
  6854.                <description><![CDATA[HelloNew releases are available: https://github.com/WEBCON-BPS/BPSExt-Signing-Autenti/releases v. 22.0.1 - with some new features for BPS 2022 versionv 23.0.0 - new version for BPS 2023Best regardsTomek]]></description>
  6855.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Webcon Team)]]></author>
  6856.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/3074#msg-3138</guid>
  6857.                <pubDate>Fri, 09 Jun 2023 07:32:43 +0200</pubDate>
  6858.                            </item>
  6859.                    <item>
  6860.                
  6861.                <title><![CDATA[Webcon Community - User Voice/Forum]]></title>
  6862.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/3118#msg-3118</link>
  6863.                <description><![CDATA[A simple change, there is a button &#039;Ask a question&#039; on both Forum and User Voice, lets make it different :)&#039;Ask a question&#039; is good for forum, that&#039;s what forums are for.For User Voice maybe change it to something like &#039;Make a suggestion&#039; or &#039;Share an idea&#039; ? - it will be clear what kind of input is expected in specific subsite of community.]]></description>
  6864.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Maksymilian Stachowiak)]]></author>
  6865.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/3118#msg-3118</guid>
  6866.                <pubDate>Fri, 02 Jun 2023 11:07:07 +0200</pubDate>
  6867.                            </item>
  6868.                    <item>
  6869.                
  6870.                <title><![CDATA[{userlan} support for calculated columns]]></title>
  6871.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/3117#msg-3117</link>
  6872.                <description><![CDATA[Hi,Is it possible to add {userlan} support for column grouping? This would be very helpful when translating calculated columns.]]></description>
  6873.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Karol Częczek)]]></author>
  6874.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/3117#msg-3117</guid>
  6875.                <pubDate>Fri, 02 Jun 2023 11:04:41 +0200</pubDate>
  6876.                            </item>
  6877.                    <item>
  6878.                
  6879.                <title><![CDATA[Possibility to genenerate PDF with QR Code]]></title>
  6880.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/3116#msg-3116</link>
  6881.                <description><![CDATA[Let&#039;s start with a use case.I&#039;ll be working soon on a process for ordering buisness cards, which will include graphic, who is responsilbe for preparing files which are sent to printing company.On the buisness cards there should be QR code with vCard data.We want to avoid manual process of copy/pasting data between webcon and other qr generation system.Action which adds code to attachment already exists, so i can always have empty pdf file to which i&#039;ll add generated QR code, but i&#039;m also thinking about possibility of generating new file, so maybe generate QR code action?To sum it up i&#039;m thinking of 2 features:* Possibility to add QR code with existing add barcode action.* Possibility to generate document with only QR code.]]></description>
  6882.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Maksymilian Stachowiak)]]></author>
  6883.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/3116#msg-3116</guid>
  6884.                <pubDate>Fri, 02 Jun 2023 11:00:22 +0200</pubDate>
  6885.                            </item>
  6886.                    <item>
  6887.                
  6888.                <title><![CDATA[Choice form field options]]></title>
  6889.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/3106#msg-3114</link>
  6890.                <description><![CDATA[Yes I tried that but it doesn&#039;t allow hiding the numbers since this is built to allow surveys.]]></description>
  6891.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (ruthw)]]></author>
  6892.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/3106#msg-3114</guid>
  6893.                <pubDate>Wed, 31 May 2023 17:34:12 +0200</pubDate>
  6894.                            </item>
  6895.                    <item>
  6896.                
  6897.                <title><![CDATA[Choice form field options]]></title>
  6898.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/3106#msg-3113</link>
  6899.                <description><![CDATA[HiCheck filed (Rating scale or Choice list (multiselect option you can get))]]></description>
  6900.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Krystian Golik)]]></author>
  6901.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/3106#msg-3113</guid>
  6902.                <pubDate>Wed, 31 May 2023 17:30:40 +0200</pubDate>
  6903.                            </item>
  6904.                    <item>
  6905.                
  6906.                <title><![CDATA[Add option to add icon to path button]]></title>
  6907.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/2285#msg-3111</link>
  6908.                <description><![CDATA[P.S.: The emojis will also work with App Names (in portal), on Start buttons (too small to be nice) and with report names.        REMEMBER: Specific emoji could produce an error - don&#039;t know which anymore, but if you have a problem, you first delete the emoji and test again.See picture]]></description>
  6909.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Bjoern Poller)]]></author>
  6910.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/2285#msg-3111</guid>
  6911.                <pubDate>Wed, 31 May 2023 09:19:42 +0200</pubDate>
  6912.                            </item>
  6913.                    <item>
  6914.                
  6915.                <title><![CDATA[Add option to add icon to path button]]></title>
  6916.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/2285#msg-3110</link>
  6917.                <description><![CDATA[Hi Adam,i am usinghttps://emojiterra.com/ for getting my &quot;icons&quot; for the path buttons.I believe in the 2020 Version of WEBCON i once used a specific emoji which produced an error, never happened again.So if you should have problems just delete it and use an other.It&#039;s worth a try. Just copy the emoji from the website an place it in _the path name field_. Sometimes there is onlya square in the preview, but on website it is ok and sometimes, if you use gendered emojis i could happen thatit is seperated to 2 emojis (type + women/men for gender).But normally i am happy with  what i get ;-) (see attached picture).Have a nice day,Bjoern]]></description>
  6918.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Bjoern Poller)]]></author>
  6919.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/2285#msg-3110</guid>
  6920.                <pubDate>Wed, 31 May 2023 09:12:31 +0200</pubDate>
  6921.                            </item>
  6922.                    <item>
  6923.                
  6924.                <title><![CDATA[Choice form field options]]></title>
  6925.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/3106#msg-3106</link>
  6926.                <description><![CDATA[Hello, I think it would be great to have different kinds of choice fields. Radio button, checkbox (with multiselect option), toggle.Thank you!]]></description>
  6927.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (ruthw)]]></author>
  6928.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/3106#msg-3106</guid>
  6929.                <pubDate>Tue, 30 May 2023 15:38:27 +0200</pubDate>
  6930.                            </item>
  6931.                    <item>
  6932.                
  6933.                <title><![CDATA[Update Autenti SDK for Webcon 2023]]></title>
  6934.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/3074#msg-3074</link>
  6935.                <description><![CDATA[Hello,please update Autenti SDK for Webcon 2023. Latest release https://github.com/WEBCON-BPS/BPSExt-Signing-Autenti/releases/tag/2022.1 is not working anymore.Best regards,Marcin]]></description>
  6936.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Marcin Vu Van)]]></author>
  6937.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/3074#msg-3074</guid>
  6938.                <pubDate>Wed, 24 May 2023 09:29:49 +0200</pubDate>
  6939.                            </item>
  6940.                    <item>
  6941.                
  6942.                <title><![CDATA[Enhancement to &#039;Validate form&#039; action]]></title>
  6943.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/3018#msg-3021</link>
  6944.                <description><![CDATA[Hi Christian,thanks, I didn&#039;t thought of this. :)Using the option to execute business rules from form rules which is available since 2022 this could actually be a replacement for the validate form action.The condition/validation rule could be defined in a business rule or form rule. This would return true or false. Than you could execute some rules and even display a multilingual message. Which would be possible adding another business rule which returns a Text.The form /business rules could get a lot but that&#039;s an interesting idea. I have a process with 8 validation actions which would again turn into 8 form rules + 16  business rules for this alone.Best regards,Daniel]]></description>
  6945.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Daniel Krüger Cosmo Consult)]]></author>
  6946.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/3018#msg-3021</guid>
  6947.                <pubDate>Fri, 12 May 2023 12:31:59 +0200</pubDate>
  6948.                            </item>
  6949.                    <item>
  6950.                
  6951.                <title><![CDATA[Enhancement to &#039;Validate form&#039; action]]></title>
  6952.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/3018#msg-3019</link>
  6953.                <description><![CDATA[Hi Daniel, you could already do that in version 2021. We had a field that was constantly left empty but in some cases wasn&#039;t mandatory, so we couldn&#039;t make it a mandatory field. Plus it is hidden on a tab, so people tended to miss it. I created a rule that defines if the field had to be filled, and if not the tab is selected, and the field marked red. All I had to do was  including the form field actions in the validation rule field. BRChris]]></description>
  6954.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Christian Amler)]]></author>
  6955.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/3018#msg-3019</guid>
  6956.                <pubDate>Fri, 12 May 2023 10:19:59 +0200</pubDate>
  6957.                            </item>
  6958.                    <item>
  6959.                
  6960.                <title><![CDATA[Enhancement to &#039;Validate form&#039; action]]></title>
  6961.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/3018#msg-3018</link>
  6962.                <description><![CDATA[Hi everyone,I think it would be great to have an opportunity to add the option to execute a form rule in case of a &#039;Validate form&#039; action fails.In most of my cases there some special condition which relates to a field/tab. Having the option to execute a form rule would allow to:- focus the field - show the tab- execute some JavaScript which would could display a subworkflow which needs to be closed.- etcWhen writing this it came to my mind, that it may be even possible today if each validate form action is an own automation which has an error handling. I haven&#039;t tested it yet but having an own automation for this  could be a bit of an overhead. :)Best regards,Daniel]]></description>
  6963.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Daniel Krüger Cosmo Consult)]]></author>
  6964.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/3018#msg-3018</guid>
  6965.                <pubDate>Fri, 12 May 2023 08:55:59 +0200</pubDate>
  6966.                            </item>
  6967.                    <item>
  6968.                
  6969.                <title><![CDATA[Support of automated builds]]></title>
  6970.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/2954#msg-2955</link>
  6971.                <description><![CDATA[I&#039;m quite sure there are at least two related posts. One from Encorsa and from me.The one from Encorsa was also about doing this automatically via / api. I would like to have this option yesterday when I published a application to 7 environments. :)My addition would be:-  to define a configurable export/import configuration. - Update the diagram before the process is exported.Unfortunately, the workflow diagram gets deleted in our environments under unknown circumstances.]]></description>
  6972.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Daniel Krüger Cosmo Consult)]]></author>
  6973.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/2954#msg-2955</guid>
  6974.                <pubDate>Wed, 26 Apr 2023 15:01:53 +0200</pubDate>
  6975.                            </item>
  6976.                    <item>
  6977.                
  6978.                <title><![CDATA[Support of automated builds]]></title>
  6979.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/2954#msg-2954</link>
  6980.                <description><![CDATA[Functionalities like import/export applications, update plugin-packages and the generation of process documentations are only available within Designer Studio.Doing things manually tend to end up in inconsistencies. E.g. when packaging a new release, we might forget to update the documentation.  Not sure what&#039;s best / easier, extending the rest api or making the functions available in a cmd line tool.Functions to nice to be automated:- Import/export of applications- Import/export of plugIn-packages- generate documentation of a process]]></description>
  6981.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Markus Jenni)]]></author>
  6982.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/2954#msg-2954</guid>
  6983.                <pubDate>Wed, 26 Apr 2023 14:07:56 +0200</pubDate>
  6984.                            </item>
  6985.                    <item>
  6986.                
  6987.                <title><![CDATA[Signature format check]]></title>
  6988.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/2904#msg-2920</link>
  6989.                <description><![CDATA[A complete check would be  when the chosen signature would check against the signature definition as well as against the existing instances. In case a signature was changed over time.Of course this would only work for static signatures which dont rely on business rules /field values.]]></description>
  6990.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Daniel Krüger Cosmo Consult)]]></author>
  6991.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/2904#msg-2920</guid>
  6992.                <pubDate>Fri, 14 Apr 2023 12:38:50 +0200</pubDate>
  6993.                            </item>
  6994.                    <item>
  6995.                
  6996.                <title><![CDATA[New built-in functions for item lists]]></title>
  6997.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/2917#msg-2917</link>
  6998.                <description><![CDATA[Hello!I&#039;d like to propose new functions for item lists:1) freezing view of the selected (first &#039;n&#039;) columns -&gt; following the thread: https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/2603?page=1#m2610;2) enabling (showing) / disabling (hiding) rows in the previously initialized item list -&gt; business case: in the step after initialization we disable (or hide) all the rows except for the selected ones (preferably); after the data was entered to the required columns of a current row, that row is being disabled, while the next one is being enabled (or shown &amp; enabled).]]></description>
  6999.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Agata Lewandowska)]]></author>
  7000.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/2917#msg-2917</guid>
  7001.                <pubDate>Wed, 12 Apr 2023 16:36:03 +0200</pubDate>
  7002.                            </item>
  7003.                    <item>
  7004.                
  7005.                <title><![CDATA[Calendar Annual View]]></title>
  7006.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/2916#msg-2916</link>
  7007.                <description><![CDATA[Hi,Is it possible to add an annual view to the calendar report?The max currently is the month view but an annual view would be beneficial.kind regards,Dean]]></description>
  7008.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Dean Barnett Dolphin IT Solutions)]]></author>
  7009.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/2916#msg-2916</guid>
  7010.                <pubDate>Wed, 12 Apr 2023 16:07:57 +0200</pubDate>
  7011.                            </item>
  7012.                    <item>
  7013.                
  7014.                <title><![CDATA[Nowa wersja BPS]]></title>
  7015.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/2913#msg-2914</link>
  7016.                <description><![CDATA[Jest to bd w wersji, poprawka znajdzie si w kolejnej opublikowanej wersji 2022.1.4, publikacja planowana jest w tym tygodniu.]]></description>
  7017.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Michał Bednarz)]]></author>
  7018.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/2913#msg-2914</guid>
  7019.                <pubDate>Wed, 12 Apr 2023 10:44:06 +0200</pubDate>
  7020.                            </item>
  7021.                    <item>
  7022.                
  7023.                <title><![CDATA[Nowa wersja BPS]]></title>
  7024.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/2913#msg-2913</link>
  7025.                <description><![CDATA[Po podniesieniu wersji do  2022.1.4.174 straciem moliwo zakadania oraz aktualizowania uytkownikw AD przez Webcon BPS. Moe Kto ju walczy z tym Problemem?]]></description>
  7026.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Robert)]]></author>
  7027.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/2913#msg-2913</guid>
  7028.                <pubDate>Wed, 12 Apr 2023 10:23:33 +0200</pubDate>
  7029.                            </item>
  7030.                    <item>
  7031.                
  7032.                <title><![CDATA[Signature format check]]></title>
  7033.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/2904#msg-2907</link>
  7034.                <description><![CDATA[There is an option to Check process in Actions menu in Studio, but I&#039;m not sure if this action validates signature and acronyms. And it is done after signature is set.Thanks Sebastian Paziewski for this tip.]]></description>
  7035.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Adam Hatak)]]></author>
  7036.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/2904#msg-2907</guid>
  7037.                <pubDate>Tue, 11 Apr 2023 12:47:24 +0200</pubDate>
  7038.                            </item>
  7039.                    <item>
  7040.                
  7041.                <title><![CDATA[Signature format check]]></title>
  7042.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/2904#msg-2905</link>
  7043.                <description><![CDATA[I&#039;d love to have something like that, for signatures and for acronyms as well. Even with not so many applications it&#039;s easy to get conflicts.]]></description>
  7044.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Maksymilian Stachowiak)]]></author>
  7045.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/2904#msg-2905</guid>
  7046.                <pubDate>Tue, 11 Apr 2023 11:47:02 +0200</pubDate>
  7047.                            </item>
  7048.                    <item>
  7049.                
  7050.                <title><![CDATA[Signature format check]]></title>
  7051.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/2904#msg-2904</link>
  7052.                <description><![CDATA[Dear All, maybe in Studio there could be a check option if signature format is used by any other process or form type?When you have many processes it gets harder to keep all acronyms unique.What do you think?]]></description>
  7053.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Adam Hatak)]]></author>
  7054.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/2904#msg-2904</guid>
  7055.                <pubDate>Tue, 11 Apr 2023 11:38:53 +0200</pubDate>
  7056.                            </item>
  7057.                    <item>
  7058.                
  7059.                <title><![CDATA[Please update the contens of INTRODUCTION TO ACTIONS IN WEBCON BPS (-&gt; File not found)]]></title>
  7060.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/2902#msg-2902</link>
  7061.                <description><![CDATA[I was searching for some information about the &quot;REMOVE PERSONAL DATA&quot; action,but WEBCON does not have a vaild link anymore:INTRODUCTION TO ACTIONS IN WEBCON BPShttps://community.webcon.com/posts/post/introduction-to-actions-in-webcon-bps/172-&gt; Remove personal data [ http://howto.webcon.com/gdpr-personal-data-administration-process/ ]     -&gt; File not foundI didn&#039;t check the other links.Thank you in advance,Bjoern Poller]]></description>
  7062.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Bjoern Poller)]]></author>
  7063.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/2902#msg-2902</guid>
  7064.                <pubDate>Mon, 10 Apr 2023 16:06:19 +0200</pubDate>
  7065.                            </item>
  7066.                    <item>
  7067.                
  7068.                <title><![CDATA[Please add new function: DELETE / REMOVE ROW for item lists (Action templates)]]></title>
  7069.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/2875#msg-2875</link>
  7070.                <description><![CDATA[The last &quot;under review&quot; entry is from Mai 2022, so i post this request just another time.It would be such a great advantage, if you would at a &quot;delete row(s)&quot; function to WEBCON Action templates.Thanks,Bjoern]]></description>
  7071.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Bjoern Poller)]]></author>
  7072.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/2875#msg-2875</guid>
  7073.                <pubDate>Mon, 03 Apr 2023 08:58:46 +0200</pubDate>
  7074.                            </item>
  7075.                    <item>
  7076.                
  7077.                <title><![CDATA[Keyboard TAB button behavior]]></title>
  7078.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/2846#msg-2846</link>
  7079.                <description><![CDATA[Hello,It would by great to change  Keyboard TAB button behavior in sql or js editor. I think TAB should make spacings for beautify code, not change focus to window buttons.]]></description>
  7080.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Marcin Lange)]]></author>
  7081.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/2846#msg-2846</guid>
  7082.                <pubDate>Tue, 28 Mar 2023 09:11:44 +0200</pubDate>
  7083.                            </item>
  7084.                    <item>
  7085.                
  7086.                <title><![CDATA[Collapsing the attachment category]]></title>
  7087.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/2837#msg-2837</link>
  7088.                <description><![CDATA[Hello, is it possible to set the category of attachments to collapsed by default?]]></description>
  7089.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Kacper)]]></author>
  7090.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/2837#msg-2837</guid>
  7091.                <pubDate>Tue, 21 Mar 2023 17:45:31 +0100</pubDate>
  7092.                            </item>
  7093.                    <item>
  7094.                
  7095.                <title><![CDATA[Improving picker selection performance]]></title>
  7096.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/2137#msg-2808</link>
  7097.                <description><![CDATA[Still present in 2022.1.4.155]]></description>
  7098.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Pasquale Ruddies)]]></author>
  7099.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/2137#msg-2808</guid>
  7100.                <pubDate>Mon, 13 Mar 2023 15:47:08 +0100</pubDate>
  7101.                            </item>
  7102.                    <item>
  7103.                
  7104.                <title><![CDATA[Switching New column and New form field]]></title>
  7105.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/2460#msg-2793</link>
  7106.                <description><![CDATA[Just created a new item list and four new fields instead of columns. This alone would be worth an update to a new version. :)]]></description>
  7107.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Daniel Krüger Cosmo Consult)]]></author>
  7108.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/2460#msg-2793</guid>
  7109.                <pubDate>Mon, 06 Mar 2023 10:37:17 +0100</pubDate>
  7110.                            </item>
  7111.                    <item>
  7112.                
  7113.                <title><![CDATA[REST API: Change to Start new element mode behavior]]></title>
  7114.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/2312#msg-2792</link>
  7115.                <description><![CDATA[Hi Daniel,In the next version of the BPS 2023 added the ability for form fields in Read-only (editable by JavaScript) mode to be edited through the API -  endpoints get /elements and get /formlayout can now differentiate and return the two types of Read-only.Bast regardsTom]]></description>
  7116.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Tomasz Batko)]]></author>
  7117.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/2312#msg-2792</guid>
  7118.                <pubDate>Mon, 06 Mar 2023 08:30:08 +0100</pubDate>
  7119.                            </item>
  7120.                    <item>
  7121.                
  7122.                <title><![CDATA[Business entity depending connections]]></title>
  7123.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/2788#msg-2788</link>
  7124.                <description><![CDATA[Hi everyone,for data sources you can define a common data source and add child sources for the parent &quot;Superior source&quot;. These child sources can then be associated to business entities, which allow you to target different backend system for each business entity.If I haven&#039;t missed anything I don&#039;t have a similar option for the Connection themselves. This is fine as long as I can use the connection in a data source. But if I use  a &quot;Invoke SOAP/REST Web service&quot; there&#039;s no such option.It would be great, if this could be added.At the moment I don&#039;t see any other option than to multiplicate the action for each company and define an execution condition depending on the business entity.Best regards,Daniel]]></description>
  7125.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Daniel Krüger Cosmo Consult)]]></author>
  7126.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/2788#msg-2788</guid>
  7127.                <pubDate>Fri, 03 Mar 2023 22:38:53 +0100</pubDate>
  7128.                            </item>
  7129.                    <item>
  7130.                
  7131.                <title><![CDATA[Input fields alignment]]></title>
  7132.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/2743#msg-2754</link>
  7133.                <description><![CDATA[Hi Martin,I personally prefer this layout as it is used in our culture in most cases.If you want you could add a styling to the global css to overwrite the default allignment using the global css..floating-point {    text-align: left !important;}Best regards,Daniel]]></description>
  7134.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Daniel Krüger Cosmo Consult)]]></author>
  7135.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/2743#msg-2754</guid>
  7136.                <pubDate>Fri, 24 Feb 2023 15:56:43 +0100</pubDate>
  7137.                            </item>
  7138.                    <item>
  7139.                
  7140.                <title><![CDATA[Input fields alignment]]></title>
  7141.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/2743#msg-2749</link>
  7142.                <description><![CDATA[I&#039;m aware of the setting. It&#039;s just annoying having to enter it for each integer &amp; float field.]]></description>
  7143.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Martin Meze Freelancer)]]></author>
  7144.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/2743#msg-2749</guid>
  7145.                <pubDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2023 12:26:51 +0100</pubDate>
  7146.                            </item>
  7147.                    <item>
  7148.                
  7149.                <title><![CDATA[Input fields alignment]]></title>
  7150.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/2743#msg-2747</link>
  7151.                <description><![CDATA[Hello, this can be done by setting the &quot;text-align: left;&quot; in &quot;Control Style&quot; in &quot;Style and behavior&quot; tab.]]></description>
  7152.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Wojciech Włodarczyk)]]></author>
  7153.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/2743#msg-2747</guid>
  7154.                <pubDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2023 08:50:50 +0100</pubDate>
  7155.                            </item>
  7156.                    <item>
  7157.                
  7158.                <title><![CDATA[Input fields alignment]]></title>
  7159.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/2743#msg-2743</link>
  7160.                <description><![CDATA[Could you please consider adding a setting that would align all input fields left/right/center? It&#039;s a little annoying having all fields aligned left and only floating-point values aligned right.]]></description>
  7161.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Martin Meze Freelancer)]]></author>
  7162.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/2743#msg-2743</guid>
  7163.                <pubDate>Mon, 20 Feb 2023 16:04:29 +0100</pubDate>
  7164.                            </item>
  7165.                    <item>
  7166.                
  7167.                <title><![CDATA[Capture ID of SharePoint document library when adding a new document]]></title>
  7168.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/660#msg-2712</link>
  7169.                <description><![CDATA[This feature would be really useful as now this can be achieved only by complicated workarounds. Webcon has grown out of Sharepoint and would be nice if also Sharepoint integration would be nurtured.]]></description>
  7170.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Aleš Jurak Admin)]]></author>
  7171.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/660#msg-2712</guid>
  7172.                <pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2023 20:34:05 +0100</pubDate>
  7173.                            </item>
  7174.                    <item>
  7175.                
  7176.                <title><![CDATA[Dark mode for WEBCON BPS Designer Studio]]></title>
  7177.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/2190#msg-2709</link>
  7178.                <description><![CDATA[I sign this petition. The bright theme is cumbersome and tiresome to work with for a long time :)]]></description>
  7179.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Wojciech Włodarczyk)]]></author>
  7180.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/2190#msg-2709</guid>
  7181.                <pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2023 12:30:42 +0100</pubDate>
  7182.                            </item>
  7183.                    <item>
  7184.                
  7185.                <title><![CDATA[Conditional running of sharepoint action]]></title>
  7186.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/2706#msg-2706</link>
  7187.                <description><![CDATA[Hello,it would be nice to have an option of inserting a &quot;CAML command&quot; similarly as it is done with &quot;SQL command&quot;. It would help in setting conditions and checking the outputs of sharepoint actions.]]></description>
  7188.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Arek Maziarczyk)]]></author>
  7189.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/2706#msg-2706</guid>
  7190.                <pubDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2023 15:21:27 +0100</pubDate>
  7191.                            </item>
  7192.                    <item>
  7193.                
  7194.                <title><![CDATA[Dark mode for BPS]]></title>
  7195.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/2704#msg-2705</link>
  7196.                <description><![CDATA[There is already User Voice for Dark Mode in Designer Studio here: https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/2190/15.Make an upvote there :)]]></description>
  7197.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Maksymilian Stachowiak)]]></author>
  7198.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/2704#msg-2705</guid>
  7199.                <pubDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2023 12:55:42 +0100</pubDate>
  7200.                            </item>
  7201.                    <item>
  7202.                
  7203.                <title><![CDATA[Dark mode for BPS]]></title>
  7204.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/2704#msg-2704</link>
  7205.                <description><![CDATA[Hi,Can you please add the ability to choose a dark theme for the Designer Studio app? It will save users eyes and improve the comfort of working for many hours in a row :)]]></description>
  7206.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Wojciech Włodarczyk)]]></author>
  7207.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/2704#msg-2704</guid>
  7208.                <pubDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2023 11:06:21 +0100</pubDate>
  7209.                            </item>
  7210.                    <item>
  7211.                
  7212.                <title><![CDATA[Horizontal Radio Buttons]]></title>
  7213.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/2145#msg-2616</link>
  7214.                <description><![CDATA[I have the following snippet saved as a global business rule. It also hides the letters before the radio buttons..dynamic-form.modern .survey-choose__list--numeric {    list-style-type: decimal;    margin-left: 6px;    margin-right: 6px;}.dynamic-form.modern .survey-choose__list {    display: flex;    margin-left: 4px;    /*flex-direction: row;    justify-content: space-between;*/}.dynamic-form.modern .survey-choose__list__item__text--key {    display: none;}]]></description>
  7215.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Martin Meze Freelancer)]]></author>
  7216.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/2145#msg-2616</guid>
  7217.                <pubDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2023 17:11:54 +0100</pubDate>
  7218.                            </item>
  7219.                    <item>
  7220.                
  7221.                <title><![CDATA[Allow management of WEBCON BPS Groups to other users than WEBCON Admins]]></title>
  7222.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/457#msg-2608</link>
  7223.                <description><![CDATA[For future reference: There will be a new option starting with 2023 R1:https://community.webcon.com/posts/post/privileges-to-manage-bps-groups/375/3]]></description>
  7224.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Daniel Krüger Cosmo Consult)]]></author>
  7225.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/457#msg-2608</guid>
  7226.                <pubDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2023 08:35:47 +0100</pubDate>
  7227.                            </item>
  7228.                    <item>
  7229.                
  7230.                <title><![CDATA[Path colors automation]]></title>
  7231.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/2181#msg-2607</link>
  7232.                <description><![CDATA[I found a new solution for this idea which is easy to implement in your processes:1. Add an html field/attribute2. Add 5 lines of code which you can copy paste to each process Optional: Choose different colors for the buttons :)https://daniels-notes.de/posts/2023/path-button-styling-revisitedBest regards,Daniel]]></description>
  7233.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Daniel Krüger Cosmo Consult)]]></author>
  7234.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/2181#msg-2607</guid>
  7235.                <pubDate>Sun, 22 Jan 2023 18:08:42 +0100</pubDate>
  7236.                            </item>
  7237.                    <item>
  7238.                
  7239.                <title><![CDATA[Filter Multiple Reports on a Dashboard]]></title>
  7240.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/2562#msg-2567</link>
  7241.                <description><![CDATA[Hi DeanAt the partner day, dashboard wide filters were announced for WEBCON BPS 2023. Check out the documents in the partner portal.Very likely the reason, why your post is marked as added to the backlog.Best regardsMarkus]]></description>
  7242.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Markus Jenni)]]></author>
  7243.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/2562#msg-2567</guid>
  7244.                <pubDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2023 08:24:09 +0100</pubDate>
  7245.                            </item>
  7246.                    <item>
  7247.                
  7248.                <title><![CDATA[Filter Multiple Reports on a Dashboard]]></title>
  7249.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/2562#msg-2566</link>
  7250.                <description><![CDATA[Hi Dean,what you can do is the following:1. Add an URL filter on all &quot;child&quot; reports. I&#039;m assuming that you have one parent/main report which should filter other reports.2. In your main report, which is used to filter the other reports, add a calculated column which will call a JavaScript function on the dashboard with the current instance id3. The JavaScript function will change the URL and apply the defined query parameter from 1) with the value send by 2).I would use a JavaScript function on the dashboard instead of generating the URL in the calculated column. The simple reason is, that we don&#039;t have access to the object ids of the application and dashboard so the URL would break when transporting the application. Or you would simply use the ids of the production environment. Let&#039;s hope that this drawback will be changed in 2023.Best regards,Daniel]]></description>
  7251.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Daniel Krüger Cosmo Consult)]]></author>
  7252.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/2562#msg-2566</guid>
  7253.                <pubDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2023 07:52:28 +0100</pubDate>
  7254.                            </item>
  7255.                    <item>
  7256.                
  7257.                <title><![CDATA[Filter Multiple Reports on a Dashboard]]></title>
  7258.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/2562#msg-2562</link>
  7259.                <description><![CDATA[Hi,In the 2017 version of WEBCON there was a filter web-part, which would filter all the reports on the page.Is this something that could be implemented in a future release to help with filtering multiple reports quickly on a dashboard?kind regards,Dean]]></description>
  7260.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Dean Barnett Dolphin IT Solutions)]]></author>
  7261.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/2562#msg-2562</guid>
  7262.                <pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2023 18:31:18 +0100</pubDate>
  7263.                            </item>
  7264.                    <item>
  7265.                
  7266.                <title><![CDATA[Rest Api User access context]]></title>
  7267.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/2513#msg-2561</link>
  7268.                <description><![CDATA[Hi,To start a new workflow instance or edit one via API,  granting application permission (scope) in the admin panel is not enough. The user/application account must also have appropriate permissions at the Process or workflow instance level.Could you provide your scenario? Below is a broader explanation of how these scopes and permissions work.There are three types of Application permissions (scopes) that you can grant to API applications. They can be distinguished by the prefix:First is Admin.*. All application permissions (scopes) of this type are sufficient to perform the operation on a given endpoint. No additional permissions granted in Designer Studio are required.All operations are performed in the context of the API application account.The Second is App.* These application permissions (scopes) are combined with the privileges granted in Designer Studio at the Application, Process, or Workflow-Form level. Privileges must be granted for the API application account. In addition, application permissions of the App.Element.* type can be combined with privileges directly to a workflow instance (for example, they are assigned each time a user receives a task).Effective permission is the intersection of these two permission levels (scopes and privileges).All operations are performed in the context of the API application account.An example of how these effective permissions work:Let&#039;s say that we granted the application permission (scope) App.Elements.ReadWrite.All for the API application named MyApiClient. This MyApiClient application will be able to edit elements via the API, but only those to which it has at least Edit privileges directly on the instance, or at the Workflow-Form or Process level.Similarly, the MyApiClient application will only be able to start new instances in those workflows where its account has been granted StartNew privileges in Designer Studio (on the workflow or process level).The Third is User.*These application permissions work almost the same as App.*.Effective permission is the intersection of two permission levels (scopes and privileges).The only difference is that privileges at the level of application, process, workflow, or instance are verified for the user account in the context the application is running, and not for the application account. API applications of type User context do not have their own accounts in the system.]]></description>
  7269.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Marcin Kapusta)]]></author>
  7270.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/2513#msg-2561</guid>
  7271.                <pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2023 18:09:09 +0100</pubDate>
  7272.                            </item>
  7273.                    <item>
  7274.                
  7275.                <title><![CDATA[Use GUID identification in HTML Templates]]></title>
  7276.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/73#msg-2543</link>
  7277.                <description><![CDATA[Will be available in 2023 R1]]></description>
  7278.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Pawel Jawien WEBCON)]]></author>
  7279.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/73#msg-2543</guid>
  7280.                <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jan 2023 07:33:24 +0100</pubDate>
  7281.                            </item>
  7282.                    <item>
  7283.                
  7284.                <title><![CDATA[Attachments preview for .md files]]></title>
  7285.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/2538#msg-2538</link>
  7286.                <description><![CDATA[I can see that you are using the Aspose.NET library to show the preview of various file types. Would it be possible to add the .md files to the list? Currently if I upload the .md file I can&#039;t open it in a preview as it works for docx, xlsx, pdf, txt...]]></description>
  7287.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Martin Meze Freelancer)]]></author>
  7288.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/2538#msg-2538</guid>
  7289.                <pubDate>Thu, 29 Dec 2022 12:57:14 +0100</pubDate>
  7290.                            </item>
  7291.                    <item>
  7292.                
  7293.                <title><![CDATA[Floating item list header]]></title>
  7294.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/2530#msg-2533</link>
  7295.                <description><![CDATA[Hi Adam,are you aware of the option to define a fixed height for the item list, that will allow you to scroll the item list only?https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/2444Best regards,Daniel]]></description>
  7296.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Daniel Krüger Cosmo Consult)]]></author>
  7297.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/2530#msg-2533</guid>
  7298.                <pubDate>Tue, 27 Dec 2022 09:02:31 +0100</pubDate>
  7299.                            </item>
  7300.                    <item>
  7301.                
  7302.                <title><![CDATA[Floating item list header]]></title>
  7303.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/2530#msg-2530</link>
  7304.                <description><![CDATA[This idea is from my good colleague Sebastian Paziewski. When users enter many rows in item list the header is not visible (hidden on top). Maybe hearder could be floating when scrolling down the list. Or there could be a &quot;copy&quot; of headers on bottom of the list (when the list is longer than visible area of item list).]]></description>
  7305.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Adam Hatak)]]></author>
  7306.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/2530#msg-2530</guid>
  7307.                <pubDate>Thu, 22 Dec 2022 15:36:43 +0100</pubDate>
  7308.                            </item>
  7309.                    <item>
  7310.                
  7311.                <title><![CDATA[Add save/upate in addition to the path transitions in mass actions]]></title>
  7312.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/2527#msg-2527</link>
  7313.                <description><![CDATA[Massactions in reports are quite usefull, but they only support path transitions. There are cases, where you would like to apply changes to workflow elements which are in different steps. For those cases i would be great having the option to just update the element rather than moving to another step.Background of this idea is a potentially new customer where we have to replace their current mass action functionality (e.g. sending e-mails, mail merge letters).Adding to possibility to just update/save data would allow to create a new style of mass actions.When initiating mass action we could then choose an option from a dropdown list and execute the corresponding action by the usage of the workflows global &quot;Upon instance saving&quot; action.]]></description>
  7314.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Markus Jenni)]]></author>
  7315.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/2527#msg-2527</guid>
  7316.                <pubDate>Thu, 22 Dec 2022 12:57:05 +0100</pubDate>
  7317.                            </item>
  7318.                    <item>
  7319.                
  7320.                <title><![CDATA[Banner Update is processing / system upgrade]]></title>
  7321.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/2519#msg-2519</link>
  7322.                <description><![CDATA[Hello, I have a suggestion to add functionality in Webcon. While I run update process a portal not working and is no any warnings or communicates about the update process. I suggest add a simple banner for example: Update is processing / system upgrade. Anything what may tell users something more than empty site.]]></description>
  7323.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (siwy10987)]]></author>
  7324.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/2519#msg-2519</guid>
  7325.                <pubDate>Tue, 20 Dec 2022 11:30:08 +0100</pubDate>
  7326.                            </item>
  7327.                    <item>
  7328.                
  7329.                <title><![CDATA[Rest Api User access context]]></title>
  7330.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/2513#msg-2513</link>
  7331.                <description><![CDATA[Hi,Adding new rest api user context in adminpanle , we can choose permissions to applications.When can chooses ReadWrite, but still it&#039;s giving possibility to overwrite element after creations. I think that good idea will be give new to of access like CreateOnly. To start only new element in Webcon, but not possible to overwrite by api.]]></description>
  7332.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Hubert Chadaj)]]></author>
  7333.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/2513#msg-2513</guid>
  7334.                <pubDate>Thu, 15 Dec 2022 11:40:19 +0100</pubDate>
  7335.                            </item>
  7336.                    <item>
  7337.                
  7338.                <title><![CDATA[Activating and deactivating elements of rules]]></title>
  7339.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/2504#msg-2504</link>
  7340.                <description><![CDATA[I think it would be appreciated by many developers, if you would add &quot;activate&quot;/&quot;deactivate&quot; on every element in the business rule / form rule / other similar places. It would make debugging much easier in many cases. Just as it is in the actions now.]]></description>
  7341.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Michał Ludwiczak)]]></author>
  7342.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/2504#msg-2504</guid>
  7343.                <pubDate>Mon, 12 Dec 2022 22:39:39 +0100</pubDate>
  7344.                            </item>
  7345.                    <item>
  7346.                
  7347.                <title><![CDATA[[solved] OCR verification process: manual filling date type form fields does not work]]></title>
  7348.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/2495#msg-2495</link>
  7349.                <description><![CDATA[Hi,the manual filling by clicking the text layer within OCR verification process is very helpful, but it isn&#039;t work for date type form fields.It doesn&#039;t work since version 2022.1.2.59 -&gt; i&#039;ve started developing the process.Thanks and best regardsDaniel## EDIT:it works if the mask is (changed to) &quot;empty&quot;. ...sorry the entry...]]></description>
  7350.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Daniel Töpel)]]></author>
  7351.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/2495#msg-2495</guid>
  7352.                <pubDate>Fri, 09 Dec 2022 11:03:58 +0100</pubDate>
  7353.                            </item>
  7354.                    <item>
  7355.                
  7356.                <title><![CDATA[[fixed] Missing Column header when using horizontal arrangement in group]]></title>
  7357.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/2493#msg-2493</link>
  7358.                <description><![CDATA[Hi,in version 2022.1.4.84 the column header isn&#039;t displayed using horizontal arrangement in group.My last version 2022.1.2.59 has displayed the header correctly.Thanks and best regardsDaniel#EDIT: fixed in ver. 2022.1.4.155]]></description>
  7359.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Daniel Töpel)]]></author>
  7360.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/2493#msg-2493</guid>
  7361.                <pubDate>Fri, 09 Dec 2022 10:12:20 +0100</pubDate>
  7362.                            </item>
  7363.                    <item>
  7364.                
  7365.                <title><![CDATA[Switching New column and New form field]]></title>
  7366.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/2460#msg-2482</link>
  7367.                <description><![CDATA[Every single time I create a new item list... ]]></description>
  7368.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Christian Amler)]]></author>
  7369.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/2460#msg-2482</guid>
  7370.                <pubDate>Wed, 07 Dec 2022 10:31:19 +0100</pubDate>
  7371.                            </item>
  7372.                    <item>
  7373.                
  7374.                <title><![CDATA[Switching New column and New form field]]></title>
  7375.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/2460#msg-2470</link>
  7376.                <description><![CDATA[10/10 need this]]></description>
  7377.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Pasquale Ruddies)]]></author>
  7378.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/2460#msg-2470</guid>
  7379.                <pubDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2022 16:24:11 +0100</pubDate>
  7380.                            </item>
  7381.                    <item>
  7382.                
  7383.                <title><![CDATA[Switching New column and New form field]]></title>
  7384.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/2460#msg-2463</link>
  7385.                <description><![CDATA[Hi Daniel, it&#039;s not just you, it happens all the time :)]]></description>
  7386.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Sebastian Gębuś)]]></author>
  7387.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/2460#msg-2463</guid>
  7388.                <pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2022 13:34:48 +0100</pubDate>
  7389.                            </item>
  7390.                    <item>
  7391.                
  7392.                <title><![CDATA[Multiple lines of text in item list - characters limit]]></title>
  7393.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/2462#msg-2462</link>
  7394.                <description><![CDATA[Hi,I don&#039;t know when the character limit for the field multiple lines of text in item lists was added, but is it possible to change this limit? Or adding the ability to change it? The DET_LongTextX column in the database is ntext type, so is there any reason to limit the number of characters to 1000?This thread may be related - https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/2366/30, and users are complaining about this limit :)]]></description>
  7395.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Sebastian Gębuś)]]></author>
  7396.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/2462#msg-2462</guid>
  7397.                <pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2022 13:30:16 +0100</pubDate>
  7398.                            </item>
  7399.                    <item>
  7400.                
  7401.                <title><![CDATA[Switching New column and New form field]]></title>
  7402.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/2460#msg-2460</link>
  7403.                <description><![CDATA[Hi,I know this is a kind of &quot;stupid&quot; request.If I select an &quot;Item list&quot;  it would be great when the order of &quot;New form field&quot; and &quot;New column&quot; would be switched. Even after years of using the Designer Studio I will create new fields instead of new columns, especially after just creating the item list. Maybe it&#039;s just me, but I doubt it.Best regards,Daniel]]></description>
  7404.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Daniel Krüger Cosmo Consult)]]></author>
  7405.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/2460#msg-2460</guid>
  7406.                <pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2022 11:00:47 +0100</pubDate>
  7407.                            </item>
  7408.                    <item>
  7409.                
  7410.                <title><![CDATA[HTML formatting in exchange actions using MS Graph connection]]></title>
  7411.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/2456#msg-2456</link>
  7412.                <description><![CDATA[Hello, after changing the connection type for exchange actions from EWS Basic to MS Graph, I lost the ability to format body text in html in exchange calendar events.Problem observed in version 2022.1.4.84.Manual update with Graph works fine, however, calling it from the built-in action, there is some conversion to body content applied here - please return us the ability to format body in html :)]]></description>
  7413.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Sebastian Gębuś)]]></author>
  7414.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/2456#msg-2456</guid>
  7415.                <pubDate>Tue, 29 Nov 2022 10:41:16 +0100</pubDate>
  7416.                            </item>
  7417.                    <item>
  7418.                
  7419.                <title><![CDATA[Diagnostic logging: Display a hint if an error is related to a timeout action]]></title>
  7420.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/2432#msg-2432</link>
  7421.                <description><![CDATA[Hi,I had a &quot;task&quot; workflow with a due date and this due date was used in a timeout in a start step. At a later point in time it was decided that a &quot;save draft&quot; path should be added which won&#039;t validate the form. Using this path failed with &quot;unknown exception&quot; and the diagnostic log did not contain any hint that this was related to the timeout.Everything was fine except that there was the below stack trace.There is also no error in the event log.It would be great if there would be a hint, that a timeout could not be created / caused the exception.Best regards,DanielSystem.Threading.Tasks.Task.ThrowIfExceptional(Boolean includeTaskCanceledExceptions) at System.Threading.Tasks.Task`1.GetResultCore(Boolean waitCompletionNotification) at WebCon.BPSCloud.Core.WfDynamic.Services.MoveElementToNextStepService.c__DisplayClass8_0.b__1(Task`1 task) at System.Threading.Tasks.ContinuationResultTaskFromResultTask`2.InnerInvoke() at System.Threading.ExecutionContext.RunFromThreadPoolDispatchLoop(Thread threadPoolThread, ExecutionContext executionContext, ContextCallback callback, Object state) --- End of stack trace from previous location --- at System.Threading.Tasks.Task.ExecuteWithThreadLocal(Task&amp; currentTaskSlot, Thread threadPoolThread) --- End of stack trace from previous location --- at WebCon.BPSCloud.Portal.API.FormsController.GoToNextStep(GoToNextStepParameters formParameters) at Microsoft.AspNetCore.Mvc.Infrastructure.ActionMethodExecutor.TaskOfIActionResultExecutor.Execute(IActionResultTypeMapper mapper, ObjectMethodExecutor executor, Object controller, Object[] arguments) at Microsoft.AspNetCore.Mvc.Infrastructure.ControllerActionInvoker.g__Logged|12_1(ControllerActionInvoker invoker) at Microsoft.AspNetCore.Mvc.Infrastructure.ControllerActionInvoker.g__Awaited|10_0(ControllerActionInvoker invoker, Task lastTask, State next, Scope scope, Object state, Boolean isCompleted) at Microsoft.AspNetCore.Mvc.Infrastructure.ControllerActionInvoker.Rethrow(ActionExecutedContextSealed context) at Microsoft.AspNetCore.Mvc.Infrastructure.ControllerActionInvoker.Next(State&amp; next, Scope&amp; scope, Object&amp; state, Boolean&amp; isCompleted) at Microsoft.AspNetCore.Mvc.Infrastructure.ControllerActionInvoker.g__Awaited|13_0(ControllerActionInvoker invoker, Task lastTask, State next, Scope scope, Object state, Boolean isCompleted) at Microsoft.AspNetCore.Mvc.Infrastructure.ResourceInvoker.g__Awaited|25_0(ResourceInvoker invoker, Task lastTask, State next, Scope scope, Object state, Boolean isCompleted) at Microsoft.AspNetCore.Mvc.Infrastructure.ResourceInvoker.Rethrow(ResourceExecutedContextSealed context) at Microsoft.AspNetCore.Mvc.Infrastructure.ResourceInvoker.Next(State&amp; next, Scope&amp; scope, Object&amp; state, Boolean&amp; isCompleted) at Microsoft.AspNetCore.Mvc.Infrastructure.ResourceInvoker.g__Awaited|20_0(ResourceInvoker invoker, Task lastTask, State next, Scope scope, Object state, Boolean isCompleted) at Microsoft.AspNetCore.Mvc.Infrastructure.ResourceInvoker.g__Logged|17_1(ResourceInvoker invoker) at Microsoft.AspNetCore.Mvc.Infrastructure.ResourceInvoker.g__Logged|17_1(ResourceInvoker invoker) at Microsoft.AspNetCore.Routing.EndpointMiddleware.g__AwaitRequestTask|6_0(Endpoint endpoint, Task requestTask, ILogger logger) at Microsoft.AspNetCore.Authorization.AuthorizationMiddleware.Invoke(HttpContext context) at WebCon.BPSCloud.Portal.Extensions.RouteValuesTypeVerificationMiddleware.InvokeAsync(HttpContext context) at WebCon.BPSCloud.Portal.Extensions.DesignerDesk.DesignerDeskActiveContextMiddleware.NotActive(HttpContext context) at WebCon.BPSCloud.Portal.Extensions.DesignerDesk.DesignerDeskActiveContextMiddleware.InvokeAsync(HttpContext context) at WebCon.BPSCloud.Portal.Extensions.DebugInfo.DebugInfoMiddleware.Invoke(HttpContext context, IDebugInfoGetter debugInfoGetter, IPerformanceCounterFactory counterFactory, IFrontendTraceProvider formatter, IDefaultableDbInfoProvider defaultableDbInfoProvider, IUserCredentialsManager userCredentialsManager, IDebugInfoManager debugInfoManager, IHttpContext synchronizedHttpCtx)]]></description>
  7422.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Daniel Krüger Cosmo Consult)]]></author>
  7423.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/2432#msg-2432</guid>
  7424.                <pubDate>Tue, 22 Nov 2022 22:10:09 +0100</pubDate>
  7425.                            </item>
  7426.                    <item>
  7427.                
  7428.                <title><![CDATA[SOAP: possibility to edit header]]></title>
  7429.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/2410#msg-2412</link>
  7430.                <description><![CDATA[There are customers out there, who implement soap-services with query string parameters. The Url often exceeds the length of 255 characters, which is currently the limit in the configurable url for the soap connection (should be extendend with the next release of WEBCON BPS).Whilst additional header parameters should be configurable on the soap connection, I would suggest that there should be also the possibility to configure query string parameters in the soap action.]]></description>
  7431.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Markus Jenni)]]></author>
  7432.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/2410#msg-2412</guid>
  7433.                <pubDate>Tue, 22 Nov 2022 09:35:21 +0100</pubDate>
  7434.                            </item>
  7435.                    <item>
  7436.                
  7437.                <title><![CDATA[SOAP: possibility to edit header]]></title>
  7438.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/2410#msg-2410</link>
  7439.                <description><![CDATA[It would be great to have the possibility to edit soap message header in a way the body is editable now. I came across couple of services (e.g. National Statistics Office in Poland) requiring secret string to be passed in the header element. So it would be good to be able to map field values to soap header element. Currently there is no way to use standard invoke soap action with this service.Thanks.W]]></description>
  7440.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Wojtek)]]></author>
  7441.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/2410#msg-2410</guid>
  7442.                <pubDate>Sat, 19 Nov 2022 14:20:44 +0100</pubDate>
  7443.                            </item>
  7444.                    <item>
  7445.                
  7446.                <title><![CDATA[Show/Hide Report Tiles in Dashboards depending on report permissions]]></title>
  7447.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/2400#msg-2400</link>
  7448.                <description><![CDATA[It would be nice to have the ability to hide report tiles in dashboards for users who don&#039;t have access to a report]]></description>
  7449.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Pasquale Ruddies)]]></author>
  7450.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/2400#msg-2400</guid>
  7451.                <pubDate>Thu, 17 Nov 2022 14:43:29 +0100</pubDate>
  7452.                            </item>
  7453.                    <item>
  7454.                
  7455.                <title><![CDATA[Dictionary: Additional System fields as columns]]></title>
  7456.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/2394#msg-2394</link>
  7457.                <description><![CDATA[Hi,after a few years I noticed that the &quot;Business entity&quot; field is missing from the available columns of a dictionary. Of course, one can create a BPS Internal view to work around it, but it would be great if more &quot;default&quot; (system fields) could be added:- Author- Date created- Last person modifying- Date modified (not listed in the system fields)- Business Entity- Form subtypeI highlighted those in the attached image.Best regards,Daniel]]></description>
  7458.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Daniel Krüger Cosmo Consult)]]></author>
  7459.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/2394#msg-2394</guid>
  7460.                <pubDate>Wed, 16 Nov 2022 08:10:11 +0100</pubDate>
  7461.                            </item>
  7462.                    <item>
  7463.                
  7464.                <title><![CDATA[WEBCONAPPS: Multitenant Allow delete of workflow instances]]></title>
  7465.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/2365#msg-2365</link>
  7466.                <description><![CDATA[Hi,it would be great, if in a multi-tenant  WEBCONAPPS environment the deletion of workflows could be activated.I understand that it&#039;s easier to remove the whole archive action but there are cases where the delete action is necessary.  For example in use case of PCG Academy during the WEBCON DAY.Deleting via REST API may be an option, I haven&#039;t tested it but I assume, that this would execute the &quot;Upon instance deleting&quot; trigger. This is not the case with the delete action, for which I&#039;m grateful as the trigger allows me to prevent the deletion from the UI even for administrators. Best regards,Daniel]]></description>
  7467.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Daniel Krüger Cosmo Consult)]]></author>
  7468.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/2365#msg-2365</guid>
  7469.                <pubDate>Mon, 07 Nov 2022 10:49:41 +0100</pubDate>
  7470.                            </item>
  7471.                    <item>
  7472.                
  7473.                <title><![CDATA[Upgrade compatibility tool]]></title>
  7474.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/2352#msg-2352</link>
  7475.                <description><![CDATA[Automatic tool to check compatibility after upgrade to new version and reporting potential issue on new version. Steps how it could work:1. Upgrade DEV to new version (small or big version)2. Pick list of IDs from PROD (global admin or app admin).3. Tool is reading all attributes and follow on production processes to recreate all steps as user did (including changing user and their privileges). Starting all parent and child workflows as it was on production.4. Reporting differences if it gets any errors during process or system couldn&#039;t pass test.5. If pass clear then change privileges/access to admins only. During process tool should use same versions as on production (red changes for deleted attributes, green for new, and red/green for updated) add all attachments as on production.  User can pick up the newest IDs that pass process on productions so it will be actual one that should work and users known best own process that should be tested instead of manual tester.If we have lot apps on Webcon upgrade will not take months to check all workflows. Tool could easy compare demanded results after upgrade as already have all details from production environment.]]></description>
  7476.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Artur Opara)]]></author>
  7477.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/2352#msg-2352</guid>
  7478.                <pubDate>Thu, 03 Nov 2022 10:47:46 +0100</pubDate>
  7479.                            </item>
  7480.                    <item>
  7481.                
  7482.                <title><![CDATA[SQL Server - indexes]]></title>
  7483.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/1623#msg-2344</link>
  7484.                <description><![CDATA[Hi!I found this topic very relevant to our environment. With &gt;30 different apps and more than 1.5 milion instances on single environment, it would be sometimes useful to improve values-lookup when our lookup set is based on DET_Att* or WFDAtt* user fields. I understand that creation of arbitrary indexes on business fields can affect SQL queries execution plans and thus reduce overall performance, but addressing this topic is important.One idea would be to be able to mark certain fields as &quot;dictionary field&quot;. It would mean that WEBCON will automatically mirror the values to an extra table with index imposed on it. Then, when using such values in pickers (for example), one can reference to &quot;indexed&quot; table instead of original WFElements, WFlementDetails and the database will use index to speed up lookup.Another idea would be to enable SOLR database to be a source of picker (directly or using REST API source to WEBCON SOLR). Then, searching and lookup should be dramatically improved - however the drawback would be delayed update of SOLR content.Would appreciate the feedback of other valuable Members]]></description>
  7485.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Jarosław Kommisarczyk)]]></author>
  7486.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/1623#msg-2344</guid>
  7487.                <pubDate>Sat, 29 Oct 2022 21:15:59 +0200</pubDate>
  7488.                            </item>
  7489.                    <item>
  7490.                
  7491.                <title><![CDATA[Forum: Mobile improvements]]></title>
  7492.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/2343#msg-2343</link>
  7493.                <description><![CDATA[Hi,maybe I&#039;m one of the few if not the only one who uses his mobile to access the community.In case this is not the cases it would be great if two things could be checked :1. I don&#039;t find the search box using a mobile. This is true for iOS as well as android.2.  Revise of the layout of a thread. There&#039;s a lot of empty space especially if there a quote. Which makes it harder to read.3. The number of answers is not displayed.Maybe this could be realized at some point to:VISUAL CUE FOR CLOSED THREADShttps://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/828?messageid=828There are currently two new questions which have been closed without an answer. This is a bit confusing. :)ThanksDaniel]]></description>
  7494.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Daniel Krüger Cosmo Consult)]]></author>
  7495.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/2343#msg-2343</guid>
  7496.                <pubDate>Sat, 29 Oct 2022 09:00:17 +0200</pubDate>
  7497.                            </item>
  7498.                    <item>
  7499.                
  7500.                <title><![CDATA[REST API: Change to Start new element mode behavior]]></title>
  7501.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/2312#msg-2312</link>
  7502.                <description><![CDATA[Hi everyone,the start new element API has the mode parameter with the following description:mode String($int32) (query)Optional mode parameter that specifies validation behavior. When empty or standard, all fields will be validated. When set ignoreReadonly, readonly fields won&#039;t be set but no error will be returned. Admin value allows to edit readonly fields, but requires admin permissions.Available values : standard, ignoreReadonly, adminI would opt for a different/additional behavior.Besides editable and readonly we have the &quot;read only editable by javascript&quot; mode. Fields with this settings should also be settable if &quot;readonly&quot; mode is selected.After all, I could start a workflow with a query parameter WFD_AttText=ABC to set the field value. Which is not possible using the REST APIBest regards,Daniel]]></description>
  7503.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Daniel Krüger Cosmo Consult)]]></author>
  7504.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/2312#msg-2312</guid>
  7505.                <pubDate>Mon, 24 Oct 2022 08:53:32 +0200</pubDate>
  7506.                            </item>
  7507.                    <item>
  7508.                
  7509.                <title><![CDATA[Substituions to be a system field]]></title>
  7510.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/2306#msg-2306</link>
  7511.                <description><![CDATA[The substitutions could be a system field so that in the reports it would be possible to see if the instance has a substitute assignee or not instead of manually open each instance to check.]]></description>
  7512.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Andreia Correia)]]></author>
  7513.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/2306#msg-2306</guid>
  7514.                <pubDate>Fri, 21 Oct 2022 15:11:03 +0200</pubDate>
  7515.                            </item>
  7516.                    <item>
  7517.                
  7518.                <title><![CDATA[Enum like structure]]></title>
  7519.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/2299#msg-2299</link>
  7520.                <description><![CDATA[Hello,during my experience with BPS Designer Studio (around 2 years) I&#039;ve been multiple times in a situation where I had to create &#039;Constants&#039; for positions from BPS &#039;Fixed values list&#039;.So there is a short list of values for example Car Types:1. Sedan2. Hatchback3. PickupLet&#039;s say you have a single form, where you want to display fields conditionally - depending on the selected Car Type.To make it well documented instead of putting Car Type (ID) = 1 - you have to create &#039;Constant&#039; CarType Sedan with value 1 and so on.Structure like enum would make this easier, and more condensed - instead of having a data source, and constants (1 app, x app, or global) there could be the enum structure, which should have a possibility to be used as data source, and it&#039;s values as values in for example buisness rules.Any suggestion on how anyone deals with it would be appreciated :)]]></description>
  7521.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Maksymilian Stachowiak)]]></author>
  7522.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/2299#msg-2299</guid>
  7523.                <pubDate>Fri, 21 Oct 2022 11:23:18 +0200</pubDate>
  7524.                            </item>
  7525.                    <item>
  7526.                
  7527.                <title><![CDATA[Copy attachment to indicated element. copy to instead copy from]]></title>
  7528.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/2288#msg-2288</link>
  7529.                <description><![CDATA[This would be a great option if the attachment could be moved to the indicated item id on the action.Currently, there is an option only to move an attachment from the indicated element to the current one (the one on which the action is) i.e. &quot;copy from&quot;, but if it were possible to move an attachment from the current one (the one on which the action is) to the indicated one &quot;copy to&quot; this would solve problems in situations where we need to use a timeout to copy something.An example would be files loaded from a hot folder that are added to a process. We want to copy such attachments to the indicated items and not copy them from hotfolder processes.]]></description>
  7530.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Marcin)]]></author>
  7531.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/2288#msg-2288</guid>
  7532.                <pubDate>Mon, 17 Oct 2022 12:54:02 +0200</pubDate>
  7533.                            </item>
  7534.                    <item>
  7535.                
  7536.                <title><![CDATA[Additional translation for Save button of Single edit dialog]]></title>
  7537.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/2287#msg-2287</link>
  7538.                <description><![CDATA[Hi,I really like the single edit dialog for an item list the only drawback is the term &quot;Save&quot;. I&#039;m getting more and more feedback that it is confusing and I have to agree. There&#039;s the save button on the workflow form which persists the data in the database. Then there&#039;s the save button in the single edit dialog, which will save the values for the row, but does not persist the data of the workflow itself. I wanted to change the term &quot;Save&quot; to &quot;Apply&quot; using the translations but I&#039;m stuck because the save button doesn&#039;t have an own translation.I hope that an own translation could be added and/or a less confusing term could be used by default.Best regards,Daniel]]></description>
  7539.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Daniel Krüger Cosmo Consult)]]></author>
  7540.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/2287#msg-2287</guid>
  7541.                <pubDate>Mon, 17 Oct 2022 10:13:16 +0200</pubDate>
  7542.                            </item>
  7543.                    <item>
  7544.                
  7545.                <title><![CDATA[Add option to add icon to path button]]></title>
  7546.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/2285#msg-2285</link>
  7547.                <description><![CDATA[Dear Community, how about adding an icon to path button? Something similar to adding an icon to menu button. I think it could be very useful and could improve user experience in this matter.Best.]]></description>
  7548.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Adam Hatak)]]></author>
  7549.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/2285#msg-2285</guid>
  7550.                <pubDate>Mon, 17 Oct 2022 09:21:53 +0200</pubDate>
  7551.                            </item>
  7552.                    <item>
  7553.                
  7554.                <title><![CDATA[Archiving - improve performance]]></title>
  7555.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/2281#msg-2281</link>
  7556.                <description><![CDATA[Hi All, We had some difficulties with archiving. We had a campaign to move to archive approx 200.000 instances. It was working very slow, taking 5-6 secs per instance. After some investigation, we found out, we can speed it up with an additional index on WFElementTasks. After creating the index - CREATE NONCLUSTERED INDEX IX_WFELementTasks_Finished ON dbo.WFELementTasks (WFT_WFHIDTaskFinished)-  it takes less than 0,3 sec per instance.Dear Webcon team, please Include this additional index in future releases.Thank you!]]></description>
  7557.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (SIMON Péter)]]></author>
  7558.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/2281#msg-2281</guid>
  7559.                <pubDate>Thu, 13 Oct 2022 12:28:53 +0200</pubDate>
  7560.                            </item>
  7561.                    <item>
  7562.                
  7563.                <title><![CDATA[Attachment copy]]></title>
  7564.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/2263#msg-2263</link>
  7565.                <description><![CDATA[Dear All, In BPS 2021 with modern layout we miss functionality to copy an attached file to clipboard. There is feature for preview, download, but no copy. Earlier - with sharepoint - we used activex component, copy to clipboard  worked fine.It would be really nice to get a copy feature. Or do you have any idea how to make it work?Thank you!Peter]]></description>
  7566.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (SIMON Péter)]]></author>
  7567.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/2263#msg-2263</guid>
  7568.                <pubDate>Wed, 05 Oct 2022 18:20:57 +0200</pubDate>
  7569.                            </item>
  7570.                    <item>
  7571.                
  7572.                <title><![CDATA[SOAP overwrite Content-Type]]></title>
  7573.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/2253#msg-2253</link>
  7574.                <description><![CDATA[Hi,If somebody know how to override in Webcon Soap Action key value Content-Type?In default is going by  text/xml by I need application/soap+xml.]]></description>
  7575.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Hubert Chadaj)]]></author>
  7576.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/2253#msg-2253</guid>
  7577.                <pubDate>Tue, 04 Oct 2022 23:08:01 +0200</pubDate>
  7578.                            </item>
  7579.                    <item>
  7580.                
  7581.                <title><![CDATA[SUGGESTION: Mix between Picture and Handwritten signature form field]]></title>
  7582.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/2230#msg-2231</link>
  7583.                <description><![CDATA[Damn it, I didn&#039;t thought of this. I want one too. :)]]></description>
  7584.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Daniel Krüger Cosmo Consult)]]></author>
  7585.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/2230#msg-2231</guid>
  7586.                <pubDate>Mon, 26 Sep 2022 17:23:03 +0200</pubDate>
  7587.                            </item>
  7588.                    <item>
  7589.                
  7590.                <title><![CDATA[SUGGESTION: Mix between Picture and Handwritten signature form field]]></title>
  7591.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/2230#msg-2230</link>
  7592.                <description><![CDATA[Hello everybody,we are working on a prototype to document defects. Therefore, we would like to use a new kind of form field:It should act as an image field to upload an image, but then act as a handwritten signature form field to mark something on the image.We tried that with the existing elements and it worked in a way. But the image scaling isn&#039;t really good, we couldn&#039;t change the pencil color and so on.So as a suggestion: Please combine these two form fields to create a pimped signature/image field. This could create more possible applications.Until then,BjoernP.S.: The added picture shows a &quot;Handwritten signature&quot; form field into that the contents of a picture form field was copied and the signature pencil was used to mark something.]]></description>
  7593.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Bjoern Poller)]]></author>
  7594.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/2230#msg-2230</guid>
  7595.                <pubDate>Mon, 26 Sep 2022 16:19:35 +0200</pubDate>
  7596.                            </item>
  7597.                    <item>
  7598.                
  7599.                <title><![CDATA[Preview functionality for Word Add-In]]></title>
  7600.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/2221#msg-2221</link>
  7601.                <description><![CDATA[Designing Word-Templates is quite straight forward. However to check to look of the final document you have to run the action somewhere in the process. So this can be quite time consuming.Having a preview functionality would add a great value to WEBCON BPS. As we already have the option to load the form values from a workflow instance, the next step would be hitting the preview button to have a look at the filled template in a new document. Like it is being done in Word when using the mailing functionality. :)]]></description>
  7602.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Markus Jenni)]]></author>
  7603.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/2221#msg-2221</guid>
  7604.                <pubDate>Thu, 22 Sep 2022 22:54:07 +0200</pubDate>
  7605.                            </item>
  7606.                    <item>
  7607.                
  7608.                <title><![CDATA[Possibilities to manage custom Navigation elements]]></title>
  7609.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/2220#msg-2220</link>
  7610.                <description><![CDATA[There all always questions whether we can change the menu of an application or not. It would be great having a Customnavigtion node under the presentation node.We should be able to create  two level menus with an icon and whether the link should open in same tab or a new one.]]></description>
  7611.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Markus Jenni)]]></author>
  7612.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/2220#msg-2220</guid>
  7613.                <pubDate>Thu, 22 Sep 2022 22:41:38 +0200</pubDate>
  7614.                            </item>
  7615.                    <item>
  7616.                
  7617.                <title><![CDATA[Provided REST API: Adding database column name to BaseField]]></title>
  7618.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/2217#msg-2217</link>
  7619.                <description><![CDATA[Hi,I haven&#039;t realized before that the REST Api doesn&#039;t contain any information about the database column. I agree in most cases this is of no use and would only create unnecessary traffic.There&#039;s one use case though were one needs it. When you read the metadata information so that you can provide a configuration option in another system to start a workflow using the URL parameters:...?com_id=1&amp;AttText1=Value1&amp;AttText4=Value2In this case we need to know the database column names of the fields.  Otherwise we would need to resort using the Designer Studio to get this information.It would be fine, if this would only be added to the response of:/api/data/v4.0/db/{dbId}/formlayoutif I missed something feel free to correct me I would be glad about it. Thanks and best regards,Daniel]]></description>
  7620.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Daniel Krüger Cosmo Consult)]]></author>
  7621.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/2217#msg-2217</guid>
  7622.                <pubDate>Thu, 22 Sep 2022 20:11:59 +0200</pubDate>
  7623.                            </item>
  7624.                    <item>
  7625.                
  7626.                <title><![CDATA[Code editors]]></title>
  7627.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/74#msg-2207</link>
  7628.                <description><![CDATA[Or maybe if it&#039;s too problematic, devs maybe could develop plugin to Visual Studio Code like in creating MS Word templates. You could pick attributes, functions, etc.]]></description>
  7629.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Rafał Hrabia)]]></author>
  7630.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/74#msg-2207</guid>
  7631.                <pubDate>Thu, 22 Sep 2022 10:28:30 +0200</pubDate>
  7632.                            </item>
  7633.                    <item>
  7634.                
  7635.                <title><![CDATA[Dark mode for WEBCON BPS Designer Studio]]></title>
  7636.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/2190#msg-2199</link>
  7637.                <description><![CDATA[I&#039;d love to have it too. It&#039;s especially uncomfortable when all applications are in dark mode, but Designer Studio is not, so the brightness is even more irritating.]]></description>
  7638.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Maksymilian Stachowiak)]]></author>
  7639.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/2190#msg-2199</guid>
  7640.                <pubDate>Wed, 21 Sep 2022 14:23:04 +0200</pubDate>
  7641.                            </item>
  7642.                    <item>
  7643.                
  7644.                <title><![CDATA[Adding virtual column for clone/delete/edit action]]></title>
  7645.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/2188#msg-2198</link>
  7646.                <description><![CDATA[Hi, we also very interested in such feature!Thanks and best regardsDaniel (another one ;-))]]></description>
  7647.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Daniel Töpel)]]></author>
  7648.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/2188#msg-2198</guid>
  7649.                <pubDate>Wed, 21 Sep 2022 13:41:48 +0200</pubDate>
  7650.                            </item>
  7651.                    <item>
  7652.                
  7653.                <title><![CDATA[more parameters for additional navigation link]]></title>
  7654.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/2195#msg-2195</link>
  7655.                <description><![CDATA[Hi, I&#039;m sure the additional navigation link is used in different ways. In our case, we reference an information portal. But if the user want to use this sites, he/she/it will lost the webcon form... Suggestion: 1. Add a checkbox for html-attribute target to set target=&quot;_blank | _self&quot;2. Add a textbox to set the html-attribute title -&gt; the title-Attribute is important for screenreader and a barrier-free design.What is the additional navigation link: https://community.webcon.com/posts/post/additional-navigation-link/210Thanks and best regardsDaniel]]></description>
  7656.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Daniel Töpel)]]></author>
  7657.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/2195#msg-2195</guid>
  7658.                <pubDate>Wed, 21 Sep 2022 12:17:03 +0200</pubDate>
  7659.                            </item>
  7660.                    <item>
  7661.                
  7662.                <title><![CDATA[Dark mode for WEBCON BPS Designer Studio]]></title>
  7663.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/2190#msg-2190</link>
  7664.                <description><![CDATA[Dear Webcon Community,as you probably know, dark mode is very popular in most modern applications. It has many benefits, but the most important is that looking at the screen for 8 hours is less exhausting for our eyes if we use dark mode.I really hope we can add this to WEBCON BPS Designer Studio :)]]></description>
  7665.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Rafał Hrabia)]]></author>
  7666.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/2190#msg-2190</guid>
  7667.                <pubDate>Wed, 21 Sep 2022 09:38:55 +0200</pubDate>
  7668.                            </item>
  7669.                    <item>
  7670.                
  7671.                <title><![CDATA[Item list column: Display usage tab]]></title>
  7672.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/1790#msg-2189</link>
  7673.                <description><![CDATA[Yes, this will be available in R4.]]></description>
  7674.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Pawel Jawien WEBCON)]]></author>
  7675.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/1790#msg-2189</guid>
  7676.                <pubDate>Tue, 20 Sep 2022 14:20:58 +0200</pubDate>
  7677.                            </item>
  7678.                    <item>
  7679.                
  7680.                <title><![CDATA[Adding virtual column for clone/delete/edit action]]></title>
  7681.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/2188#msg-2188</link>
  7682.                <description><![CDATA[Hi,from time to time we have the use case that an item list row may not be delete under specific circumstances by the user. Currently there&#039;s no easy way to prevent this.One option could be to display &quot;virtual&quot; columns for these actions in the item list, so that one could make use of the existing functionality &quot;column edit restriction&quot;. With this we could define whether the action should be displayed for this row like it is possible to define whether a cell is editable or not.Best regards,Daniel]]></description>
  7683.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Daniel Krüger Cosmo Consult)]]></author>
  7684.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/2188#msg-2188</guid>
  7685.                <pubDate>Tue, 20 Sep 2022 13:05:17 +0200</pubDate>
  7686.                            </item>
  7687.                    <item>
  7688.                
  7689.                <title><![CDATA[Path colors automation]]></title>
  7690.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/2181#msg-2187</link>
  7691.                <description><![CDATA[I would also prefer such an option but with two changes:The path buttons would have a class with the name of the color or so This class could than be set in the themes so that we could change the color slightly to match the theme.In addition it would be great to have an option to define the meaning of each color. This would be displayed below the description of the path in a slightly different styling.Best regards,Daniel]]></description>
  7692.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Daniel Krüger Cosmo Consult)]]></author>
  7693.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/2181#msg-2187</guid>
  7694.                <pubDate>Tue, 20 Sep 2022 12:49:47 +0200</pubDate>
  7695.                            </item>
  7696.                    <item>
  7697.                
  7698.                <title><![CDATA[Item list column: Display usage tab]]></title>
  7699.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/1790#msg-2186</link>
  7700.                <description><![CDATA[As of 2022.1.3.65 this is not implemented, will this be available in R4?]]></description>
  7701.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Pasquale Ruddies)]]></author>
  7702.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/1790#msg-2186</guid>
  7703.                <pubDate>Tue, 20 Sep 2022 12:46:45 +0200</pubDate>
  7704.                            </item>
  7705.                    <item>
  7706.                
  7707.                <title><![CDATA[Path colors automation]]></title>
  7708.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/2181#msg-2182</link>
  7709.                <description><![CDATA[Please have a look at the concept proposed by Daniel Krger.https://daniels-notes.de/posts/2021/path-button-stylingAs long as we are only able to apply styles to paths this is the best solution.]]></description>
  7710.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Markus Jenni)]]></author>
  7711.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/2181#msg-2182</guid>
  7712.                <pubDate>Mon, 19 Sep 2022 11:57:22 +0200</pubDate>
  7713.                            </item>
  7714.                    <item>
  7715.                
  7716.                <title><![CDATA[Path colors automation]]></title>
  7717.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/2181#msg-2181</link>
  7718.                <description><![CDATA[Can you add path button style options (in Global parameters - appearance) for every path color available in a workflow diagram (8 colors) ?So, changing a path color should apply corresponding button style in the path.This would greatly improve development time, in a big workflow entering path button style for every path is time consuming.Also, this will keep colors consistent between workflow diagram and the form.]]></description>
  7719.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Rafał Kowalewski)]]></author>
  7720.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/2181#msg-2181</guid>
  7721.                <pubDate>Fri, 16 Sep 2022 19:39:08 +0200</pubDate>
  7722.                            </item>
  7723.                    <item>
  7724.                
  7725.                <title><![CDATA[Horizontal Radio Buttons]]></title>
  7726.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/2145#msg-2146</link>
  7727.                <description><![CDATA[Hi Dean,this could be an interesting option to set by default.For the moment one can achieve the same with some css  styling using an html field. This works with 2022.1.3.65.Best regards,Daniel#AttChoose5 .survey-choose__list--radio {display:block;}#AttChoose5 .survey-choose__list__item {margin-right:10px}]]></description>
  7728.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Daniel Krüger Cosmo Consult)]]></author>
  7729.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/2145#msg-2146</guid>
  7730.                <pubDate>Mon, 12 Sep 2022 21:15:02 +0200</pubDate>
  7731.                            </item>
  7732.                    <item>
  7733.                
  7734.                <title><![CDATA[Horizontal Radio Buttons]]></title>
  7735.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/2145#msg-2145</link>
  7736.                <description><![CDATA[Hi, would it be possible to have an option for radio buttons to be formatted to appear horizontally on the form instead of vertically?Would be a good addition to help save space on a form.kind regards,Dean]]></description>
  7737.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Dean Barnett Dolphin IT Solutions)]]></author>
  7738.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/2145#msg-2145</guid>
  7739.                <pubDate>Mon, 12 Sep 2022 18:32:36 +0200</pubDate>
  7740.                            </item>
  7741.                    <item>
  7742.                
  7743.                <title><![CDATA[Form Offline Mode]]></title>
  7744.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/2144#msg-2144</link>
  7745.                <description><![CDATA[Hi, is it possible to implement some sort of offline mode for when users are entering data into a form to help with preventing the loss of data?People will use the Mobile App while on site and it&#039;s possible they will lose connection and lose all the data they have entered before they could save or submit.For the form to work again they will need to reconnect and unfortunately refresh the form causing them to lose everything they have entered. kind regards,Dean]]></description>
  7746.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Dean Barnett Dolphin IT Solutions)]]></author>
  7747.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/2144#msg-2144</guid>
  7748.                <pubDate>Fri, 09 Sep 2022 13:55:56 +0200</pubDate>
  7749.                            </item>
  7750.                    <item>
  7751.                
  7752.                <title><![CDATA[Improving picker selection performance]]></title>
  7753.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/2137#msg-2137</link>
  7754.                <description><![CDATA[Hi everyone,I noticed on version 2022.1.2.31 that it can take a really long time to populate the target field of choice field, if the data source is a web service data source. In this case the data source is a REST data source and the picker field is of type popup search. Once I activated the diagnostic mode I noticed that after getting the picker results (1) the chosen value is validated again before the target field is set. In the attached image, to which the numbers refer,  this validation took 5 seconds even so &#039;Validate the typed values in the data source&#039; is ticked of (3) and not less than three further request (2) have been send to the external system. Also it&#039;s a popup search from which the value was just selected. Which in turn means, that ich can select a value from the popup search, continue filling out other fields and some time later the target fields value will be updated.I would be glad, if this process could be improved.This also applies to 2022.1.3.65.Best regards,Daniel]]></description>
  7755.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Daniel Krüger Cosmo Consult)]]></author>
  7756.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/2137#msg-2137</guid>
  7757.                <pubDate>Tue, 06 Sep 2022 23:04:17 +0200</pubDate>
  7758.                            </item>
  7759.                    <item>
  7760.                
  7761.                <title><![CDATA[Reducing human errors in Export/Import of Applications configuration]]></title>
  7762.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/2116#msg-2117</link>
  7763.                <description><![CDATA[Hi DanielYou&#039;re addressing a problem that can be quite troublesome on a running system. It appeared to me once, that after quite a lot of changes, that a text field showed a value i never entered. This was because a previously used field had been removed and later a new field had been mapped to the same column of the internal table.To avoid this, i started to mark a field i don&#039;t use anymore as &quot;Archival field&quot;. Not sure whether this is good practice or not.However i would appreciate a built-in handling for field type changes. This could be as you suggested, some sort of a download after the import. We should then be able to define kind of a migration scenario.]]></description>
  7764.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Markus Jenni)]]></author>
  7765.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/2116#msg-2117</guid>
  7766.                <pubDate>Wed, 31 Aug 2022 07:29:40 +0200</pubDate>
  7767.                            </item>
  7768.                    <item>
  7769.                
  7770.                <title><![CDATA[Reducing human errors in Export/Import of Applications configuration]]></title>
  7771.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/2116#msg-2116</link>
  7772.                <description><![CDATA[Hi everyone,have you ever imported a process and thought, damn I forgot to tick this or untick the other field?In my case this has happened more than I want to admit. Most times everything works fine but know and then you get disturbed and you make a mistake in the selection.Of course one could have a check list to verify everything, but even this will fail. So I&#039;m wondering whether one or both of these ideas could help  with this human error problem.1. Changing from checkbox to a drop down with &quot;Undefined&quot;, &quot;Yes&quot;,&quot;No&quot; and every value is set to &quot;undefined&quot;. This will of course be annoying to set since you can&#039;t simple click through with the default values but it will force you to think about your decision.  Maybe a parameter could be added so that you can activate whether the drop down value will be &quot;undefined&quot; or the current default value. So that you can enforce this on production /dev.2. After selecting the options in the export/import could we get a &quot;download&quot; configuration button, which saves the current settings. This file could then be loaded at another time and set the options as they have once been defined.Best regards,Daniel]]></description>
  7773.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Daniel Krüger Cosmo Consult)]]></author>
  7774.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/2116#msg-2116</guid>
  7775.                <pubDate>Tue, 30 Aug 2022 20:35:53 +0200</pubDate>
  7776.                            </item>
  7777.                    <item>
  7778.                
  7779.                <title><![CDATA[Send a custom email - Mail language: based on form field]]></title>
  7780.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/2102#msg-2104</link>
  7781.                <description><![CDATA[Hi PawelThanks for the tip, i thought this would be possible but i kind of want to remove the need for having multiple E-Mail Templates and needing to change them all instead of using a business rule to provide the translated e-mail content and be able to make necessary changes in one place.]]></description>
  7782.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Pasquale Ruddies)]]></author>
  7783.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/2102#msg-2104</guid>
  7784.                <pubDate>Thu, 25 Aug 2022 12:02:24 +0200</pubDate>
  7785.                            </item>
  7786.                    <item>
  7787.                
  7788.                <title><![CDATA[Send a custom email - Mail language: based on form field]]></title>
  7789.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/2102#msg-2103</link>
  7790.                <description><![CDATA[Hi PasqualeYou can try to use our idea as a workaround for now.We have a set of Action templates for every language (email EN; email PL...) and a set of email notification templates in different languages (FK_EN; FK_PL...) and an execution condition based on the field &quot;Kraj&quot; (Country).If Country = Poland we execute the action/template in the Polish language.If Country  Poland we execute the action/template in English.]]></description>
  7791.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Pawel Jawien WEBCON)]]></author>
  7792.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/2102#msg-2103</guid>
  7793.                <pubDate>Thu, 25 Aug 2022 11:24:13 +0200</pubDate>
  7794.                            </item>
  7795.                    <item>
  7796.                
  7797.                <title><![CDATA[Send a custom email - Mail language: based on form field]]></title>
  7798.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/2102#msg-2102</link>
  7799.                <description><![CDATA[It would be nice if you had the possibility to define the language in which a custom email is sent based on a form field or item list column.We have multiple applications where recipients of e-mails have to addressed in their own language regardless of the user language which is used in the form.]]></description>
  7800.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Pasquale Ruddies)]]></author>
  7801.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/2102#msg-2102</guid>
  7802.                <pubDate>Thu, 25 Aug 2022 11:02:59 +0200</pubDate>
  7803.                            </item>
  7804.                    <item>
  7805.                
  7806.                <title><![CDATA[Bussines / Form rule]]></title>
  7807.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/2093#msg-2093</link>
  7808.                <description><![CDATA[Hi,I propose to add in Bussines and Form rules internal parameters like in automatizations.I will be helpful for calculating or savng data to compare, not using JS mode.]]></description>
  7809.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Hubert Chadaj)]]></author>
  7810.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/2093#msg-2093</guid>
  7811.                <pubDate>Tue, 23 Aug 2022 09:44:21 +0200</pubDate>
  7812.                            </item>
  7813.                    <item>
  7814.                
  7815.                <title><![CDATA[Attachment Preview panel  (BPS 2021.1.5)]]></title>
  7816.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/2092#msg-2092</link>
  7817.                <description><![CDATA[Dear All,We have a widely used Incoming Invoice process, which manage validation and approval of digitized invoices. We use valueable feature of Attachment Preview on form to show invoice image during some validation/approval steps. (We use other feature for OCR verification)  We register invoices as &quot;Invoice&quot; category attachment, but there can be other connecting documents.On Classis form in Sharepoint it worked perfectly, Preview showed first document (min att_id) which was always the invoice.As we are switching to Modern form, we realized that in several cases not the invoice pdf is shown in preview panel. (but other attached document)On Modern form it shows the first element of the first category.So,if there is a document not categorized (category=), it will be always the first.If there is a document with category smaller than &#039;Invoice&#039;, it will be the first and shown.There is a property on form to change order of attachments, but it applies only within groups.Do you have any idea to overcome this issue? We could rename attachment categories but I do not really like the idea.My proposal would be to introduce some improvement, 1. add some new properties to form: category for previewand/or2. new sort type:  attachment id  (att_id) order descWhat do you think?Any ide would be appreciated!Thank you!Peter]]></description>
  7818.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (SIMON Péter)]]></author>
  7819.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/2092#msg-2092</guid>
  7820.                <pubDate>Mon, 22 Aug 2022 16:17:23 +0200</pubDate>
  7821.                            </item>
  7822.                    <item>
  7823.                
  7824.                <title><![CDATA[My tasks - sorting]]></title>
  7825.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/1581#msg-2081</link>
  7826.                <description><![CDATA[Hi,I agree.Several of my clients have asked about this possibility.Changing the sort order as a minimum, adding other criteria - an addition.]]></description>
  7827.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Paweł Przychodzeń)]]></author>
  7828.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/1581#msg-2081</guid>
  7829.                <pubDate>Tue, 16 Aug 2022 14:03:07 +0200</pubDate>
  7830.                            </item>
  7831.                    <item>
  7832.                
  7833.                <title><![CDATA[Delete or hide the System Dashboard]]></title>
  7834.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/1401#msg-2066</link>
  7835.                <description><![CDATA[Hey both, thank you for the hint. It&#039;s good enough. Cheers,Martin]]></description>
  7836.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Martin Meze Freelancer)]]></author>
  7837.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/1401#msg-2066</guid>
  7838.                <pubDate>Tue, 09 Aug 2022 11:15:14 +0200</pubDate>
  7839.                            </item>
  7840.                    <item>
  7841.                
  7842.                <title><![CDATA[Delete or hide the System Dashboard]]></title>
  7843.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/1401#msg-2057</link>
  7844.                <description><![CDATA[I asked Bartek if it really had to be for the entire portal (i.e., every application), and he replied &quot;no -- use this CSS syntax for one application at time&quot;: [href=&quot;/db/1/app/10/dashboards/system&quot;] {  display: none;} Where 1 = db id and 10 = your app ID. If you want to do this to multiple applications, you&#039;ll need multiple entries, of course.]]></description>
  7845.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Mike Fitzmaurice)]]></author>
  7846.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/1401#msg-2057</guid>
  7847.                <pubDate>Thu, 04 Aug 2022 15:44:37 +0200</pubDate>
  7848.                            </item>
  7849.                    <item>
  7850.                
  7851.                <title><![CDATA[Delete or hide the System Dashboard]]></title>
  7852.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/1401#msg-2056</link>
  7853.                <description><![CDATA[To add to Bartek&#039;s response, you can do this, but it will hide *every* system dashboard from the navigation bar for *every application*. The CSS looks like this: [id=&quot;system#dashboard&quot;]{display: none;}]]></description>
  7854.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Mike Fitzmaurice)]]></author>
  7855.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/1401#msg-2056</guid>
  7856.                <pubDate>Thu, 04 Aug 2022 14:48:15 +0200</pubDate>
  7857.                            </item>
  7858.                    <item>
  7859.                
  7860.                <title><![CDATA[Delete or hide the System Dashboard]]></title>
  7861.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/1401#msg-2054</link>
  7862.                <description><![CDATA[Hello, just to provide short upgrade it is possible to hide system dashboard from left menu by using CSS in System settings (Global CSS Styles).]]></description>
  7863.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Bartłomiej Spyrka WEBCON)]]></author>
  7864.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/1401#msg-2054</guid>
  7865.                <pubDate>Thu, 04 Aug 2022 07:14:51 +0200</pubDate>
  7866.                            </item>
  7867.                    <item>
  7868.                
  7869.                <title><![CDATA[Extended Audit capabilities]]></title>
  7870.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/1635#msg-2025</link>
  7871.                <description><![CDATA[Hi MartinAs we lost the tender, i did not dig deeper into this topic. Maybe i will come back to this in future. There are also questions about how and where to integrate the reports. In my opinion, there are not enough possibilities to extend/customize WEBCON BPS at the moment.]]></description>
  7872.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Markus Jenni)]]></author>
  7873.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/1635#msg-2025</guid>
  7874.                <pubDate>Wed, 27 Jul 2022 16:04:10 +0200</pubDate>
  7875.                            </item>
  7876.                    <item>
  7877.                
  7878.                <title><![CDATA[Extended Audit capabilities]]></title>
  7879.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/1635#msg-2009</link>
  7880.                <description><![CDATA[I&#039;m too interested in this. Did you manage to do something about the auditing?]]></description>
  7881.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Martin Meze Freelancer)]]></author>
  7882.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/1635#msg-2009</guid>
  7883.                <pubDate>Tue, 26 Jul 2022 10:58:07 +0200</pubDate>
  7884.                            </item>
  7885.                    <item>
  7886.                
  7887.                <title><![CDATA[Advanced Search for pop-up search window]]></title>
  7888.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/1968#msg-1968</link>
  7889.                <description><![CDATA[The pop-up search window gives the possibility to search in a specific field or in all fields. We&#039;ve found many cases where an &quot;advanced search&quot; mode would be extremely helpful. To achive this, the configuration section of the choice field, should be extended with an additional checkbox column &quot;Advanced Search (PopUp)&quot;.If any field is checked in this section, the popup search window should behave in one of the following ways.1. Showing an &quot;Advanced Search&quot; button, which would then toggle the standard search box to a labels and input fields for the checked fields, the search button and a back to standard search button2. Shows the checked fields plus the standard search boxUltimate options:- the ability to tell whether the fields should be search by the and/or operator by the user- make the default display mode standard/advanced Search configurable]]></description>
  7890.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Markus Jenni)]]></author>
  7891.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/1968#msg-1968</guid>
  7892.                <pubDate>Thu, 14 Jul 2022 17:59:09 +0200</pubDate>
  7893.                            </item>
  7894.                    <item>
  7895.                
  7896.                <title><![CDATA[New field config combined with scan functionality of WebCon App]]></title>
  7897.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/1958#msg-1958</link>
  7898.                <description><![CDATA[Dear Webcon Team,we are still looking forward to get a helpful tool for getting barcodes / qr-codes on mobile phone into fields.Now we realized, that the WebCon App has a build in functionality for scaning codes. However this helps only for searching documents / contents.Would it be possible to combine this build in functionality with fields input?It would be really great to be able to configure the &quot;Keyboard type on mobile devices:&quot; to &quot;scan&quot;, which leads to following behaviour in the mobile app:1) click on field2) Scan-Camera functionality starts3) after succesfully scan -&gt; scanned value will be set to fieldDoneThanks a lotP.S. We are working with 2021.1.4.154, but so far as we know exists the required functionality also not in the latest version, but not completely sure :)Best regardsThomas]]></description>
  7899.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Thomas Dengler)]]></author>
  7900.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/1958#msg-1958</guid>
  7901.                <pubDate>Wed, 13 Jul 2022 11:38:40 +0200</pubDate>
  7902.                            </item>
  7903.                    <item>
  7904.                
  7905.                <title><![CDATA[Restoring the old functionality to copy &amp; paste group elements with all formfields inside]]></title>
  7906.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/1955#msg-1955</link>
  7907.                <description><![CDATA[Hi,since version 2022.1.2.59 (my last 2021.1.4.118) i can&#039;t copy &amp; paste group elements.  Is it possible to get back this feature!?For example: we have for all workflows and steps the same headline and a specific subtitle. With copy &amp; paste I can create very fast the basics of a (new) workflow...Thanks and best regardsDaniel]]></description>
  7908.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Daniel Töpel)]]></author>
  7909.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/1955#msg-1955</guid>
  7910.                <pubDate>Mon, 11 Jul 2022 23:31:00 +0200</pubDate>
  7911.                            </item>
  7912.                    <item>
  7913.                
  7914.                <title><![CDATA[Add parameter to REST data source - reuse in other processes]]></title>
  7915.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/1926#msg-1945</link>
  7916.                <description><![CDATA[Hi, unfortunately the status was set to &quot;not now&quot; and so I&#039;ve tried again to use the global business rules and I think it could be working, but there is a problem to save the params. In expert modus you see a field like #{I:1234}#. It means the ID-Value from a choice field. If I save only one parameter-field it changed into {#I:1234}# and isn&#039;t working. If I save all together then the fields are empty again...Dear webcon - is this the right way and only params-bug has to resolved?Thanks and best regards]]></description>
  7917.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Daniel Töpel)]]></author>
  7918.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/1926#msg-1945</guid>
  7919.                <pubDate>Fri, 08 Jul 2022 23:49:07 +0200</pubDate>
  7920.                            </item>
  7921.                    <item>
  7922.                
  7923.                <title><![CDATA[Restoring the old functionality for the action and possibly for the automation]]></title>
  7924.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/1937#msg-1937</link>
  7925.                <description><![CDATA[Hi,the new feature automations is very helpful, but ive missed the very often used option create template.Are you planning to reimplement this old feature to the actions and automations?Thanks and best regardsDaniel]]></description>
  7926.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Daniel Töpel)]]></author>
  7927.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/1937#msg-1937</guid>
  7928.                <pubDate>Wed, 06 Jul 2022 19:35:02 +0200</pubDate>
  7929.                            </item>
  7930.                    <item>
  7931.                
  7932.                <title><![CDATA[Add parameter to REST data source - reuse in other processes]]></title>
  7933.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/1926#msg-1928</link>
  7934.                <description><![CDATA[Thanks, Maksymilian Stachowiak.I already tried that some time ago, but if you use the &#039;Data Source Value&#039;-function theres no point to set the params for global rule dynamically.... So ive to wait and clone and wait, ... ;-)Have a nice day!]]></description>
  7935.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Daniel Töpel)]]></author>
  7936.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/1926#msg-1928</guid>
  7937.                <pubDate>Thu, 30 Jun 2022 15:18:44 +0200</pubDate>
  7938.                            </item>
  7939.                    <item>
  7940.                
  7941.                <title><![CDATA[Add parameter to REST data source - reuse in other processes]]></title>
  7942.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/1926#msg-1927</link>
  7943.                <description><![CDATA[As it would be a really nice feature - for now you can try creating 2 buisness rules with parameters.1. Buisness rule for whole JSON body, with 4 parameters, and use that rule inside of request.2. Buisness rule for Suffix with 1 parameter.Depending on how you want to use it Buisness rules should be configured globally if you want to use them on data source, or could be configured inside process when setting the body inside of Rest WebService action.By placing those in value mapping / suffix url you should be able to map parameters to those rules giving you what you need :)SQL From the pictures here: https://pastebin.com/wZx0fXvQ]]></description>
  7944.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Maksymilian Stachowiak)]]></author>
  7945.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/1926#msg-1927</guid>
  7946.                <pubDate>Thu, 30 Jun 2022 12:59:27 +0200</pubDate>
  7947.                            </item>
  7948.                    <item>
  7949.                
  7950.                <title><![CDATA[Add parameter to REST data source - reuse in other processes]]></title>
  7951.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/1926#msg-1926</link>
  7952.                <description><![CDATA[Hi @all,Ive many processes they use the same rest-request to fill choice fields, table, etc. But the request requires a dynamic values in _url-parameter_ or _request-body_.At the moment ive to clone the *same* data source for every process... not nice ;-) !A parameter would solve the problem - like as parameter into rules!  Thanks and best regardsDaniel]]></description>
  7953.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Daniel Töpel)]]></author>
  7954.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/1926#msg-1926</guid>
  7955.                <pubDate>Thu, 30 Jun 2022 11:46:12 +0200</pubDate>
  7956.                            </item>
  7957.                    <item>
  7958.                
  7959.                <title><![CDATA[Choice Tree intermediate nodes]]></title>
  7960.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/1914#msg-1914</link>
  7961.                <description><![CDATA[As already mentioned by Ajnar in the forum: https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/1792 there are issues with the field choice tree in version 2022.1.2.31 and 2022.1.2.59.It is no longer possible to limit the selection to the last node even if the checkbox &quot;Allow also choosing intermediate nodes&quot; is unselected.Previously, clicking on an intermediate node opened the nodes below it - now clicking on the intermediate node selects it.Is this a know issue or am i missing sth? Thanks :)]]></description>
  7962.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Oli)]]></author>
  7963.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/1914#msg-1914</guid>
  7964.                <pubDate>Wed, 29 Jun 2022 17:25:31 +0200</pubDate>
  7965.                            </item>
  7966.                    <item>
  7967.                
  7968.                <title><![CDATA[Hot-Mail-Box: Improve handling of additional files]]></title>
  7969.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/1912#msg-1912</link>
  7970.                <description><![CDATA[Our scenario:We are sending a prefilled pdf document to an external user with the instruction to complete the form and return it together with a copy of the id/passport. Which could be one or more pdfs or images. We&#039;ve configured a hot-mail-box to check for e-mail having a pdf with a valid barcode. The pdf with the barcode is attached nicely :).But also want to add the additional attachments.One should expect that according the documentation the configuration of additional attachment filter would actually add additional attachments. After talking to the support this is only the case when those attachments also have a barcode.I can see that this behavior can make sense for some cases.But it should be also possible to add attachments without barcodes. Otherwise we have to upload the whole e-mail, which in preview mode shows attachments like images, but with a low quality.]]></description>
  7971.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Markus Jenni)]]></author>
  7972.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/1912#msg-1912</guid>
  7973.                <pubDate>Wed, 29 Jun 2022 12:04:34 +0200</pubDate>
  7974.                            </item>
  7975.                    <item>
  7976.                
  7977.                <title><![CDATA[Improve Handwritten signature field quality]]></title>
  7978.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/1823#msg-1823</link>
  7979.                <description><![CDATA[Dear WEBCON Team, as I posted my thoughts here:https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/1613I would like to submit my request to improve quality of the signature, or at least add option to choose quality of the field. Currently there is no option to improve quality and now it&#039;s very low (pixels, blur).Best,Adam]]></description>
  7980.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Adam Hatak)]]></author>
  7981.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/1823#msg-1823</guid>
  7982.                <pubDate>Thu, 02 Jun 2022 14:31:26 +0200</pubDate>
  7983.                            </item>
  7984.                    <item>
  7985.                
  7986.                <title><![CDATA[Feature: Delete Row (Item List)]]></title>
  7987.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/1739#msg-1796</link>
  7988.                <description><![CDATA[Hi, I&#039;m going to need this in the future, so I created an example action:https://daniels-notes.de/posts/2022/remove-item-list-rowsBest regards,Daniel]]></description>
  7989.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Daniel Krüger Cosmo Consult)]]></author>
  7990.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/1739#msg-1796</guid>
  7991.                <pubDate>Wed, 25 May 2022 23:16:23 +0200</pubDate>
  7992.                            </item>
  7993.                    <item>
  7994.                
  7995.                <title><![CDATA[Item list column: Display usage tab]]></title>
  7996.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/1790#msg-1790</link>
  7997.                <description><![CDATA[Hi everyone,when an item list column is deleted, it will be checked whether it is used and the usages can be displayed. It would be nice, if we could have this option without clicking delete. :)I attached the screenshot which displays the usage of the item list column and that the usages are different from the item list itself. So the usages of the item list column are actually checked.BPS Version: 2022.1.2.31Best regards,Daniel]]></description>
  7998.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Daniel Krüger Cosmo Consult)]]></author>
  7999.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/1790#msg-1790</guid>
  8000.                <pubDate>Fri, 20 May 2022 12:04:17 +0200</pubDate>
  8001.                            </item>
  8002.                    <item>
  8003.                
  8004.                <title><![CDATA[[Done] BPS 2022: Process configuration has been changed any chances to reduce these messages?]]></title>
  8005.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/1406#msg-1770</link>
  8006.                <description><![CDATA[Thanks WEBCON for whatever you did in 2022 R2 :)]]></description>
  8007.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Daniel Krüger Cosmo Consult)]]></author>
  8008.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/1406#msg-1770</guid>
  8009.                <pubDate>Tue, 17 May 2022 20:35:50 +0200</pubDate>
  8010.                            </item>
  8011.                    <item>
  8012.                
  8013.                <title><![CDATA[Custom css classes for input fields]]></title>
  8014.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/1669#msg-1762</link>
  8015.                <description><![CDATA[Actually I would prefer a simple bread over a cake in this case. The one thing theming is good for is creating problems, especially if you don&#039;t have full control over the website. :)But this is beside the topic and only a personal opinion. :)]]></description>
  8016.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Daniel Krüger Cosmo Consult)]]></author>
  8017.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/1669#msg-1762</guid>
  8018.                <pubDate>Mon, 16 May 2022 14:24:23 +0200</pubDate>
  8019.                            </item>
  8020.                    <item>
  8021.                
  8022.                <title><![CDATA[Grant permission for users to access the rest api]]></title>
  8023.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/1713#msg-1759</link>
  8024.                <description><![CDATA[Hi Kamil, thanks for the update. In my case this will come in handy in the near future:)Best regards Daniel]]></description>
  8025.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Daniel Krüger Cosmo Consult)]]></author>
  8026.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/1713#msg-1759</guid>
  8027.                <pubDate>Mon, 16 May 2022 10:23:46 +0200</pubDate>
  8028.                            </item>
  8029.                    <item>
  8030.                
  8031.                <title><![CDATA[Grant permission for users to access the rest api]]></title>
  8032.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/1713#msg-1758</link>
  8033.                <description><![CDATA[We recently updated the article on authentication and added one about scopes, take a look at them:https://developer.webcon.com/docs/registration-and-authentiaction/#oauth-20-authorization-codehttps://developer.webcon.com/docs/scopes-and-permissions/In short, we&#039;ve added support for two additional authentication flows in the oauth 2.0 standard. I think authorization code (maybe with a refresh token) should be enough for your scenario.I also looked at the code you included, the &quot;invalid scope&quot; error is due to what I mentioned earlier. In version 2022, the security of the public api is based on scops, each endpoint has a certain set of required scopes (described in swagger), while the login account/tokenLogin endpoint you used returns token with scopes used only by studio.]]></description>
  8034.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Kamil Skrzypiec)]]></author>
  8035.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/1713#msg-1758</guid>
  8036.                <pubDate>Mon, 16 May 2022 10:03:18 +0200</pubDate>
  8037.                            </item>
  8038.                    <item>
  8039.                
  8040.                <title><![CDATA[Custom css classes for input fields]]></title>
  8041.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/1669#msg-1756</link>
  8042.                <description><![CDATA[Global css styles definable in the theme is one thing i&#039;m waiting for a long time. https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/41/15It would be the icing of the cake.]]></description>
  8043.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Markus Jenni)]]></author>
  8044.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/1669#msg-1756</guid>
  8045.                <pubDate>Mon, 16 May 2022 08:39:38 +0200</pubDate>
  8046.                            </item>
  8047.                    <item>
  8048.                
  8049.                <title><![CDATA[Custom css classes for input fields]]></title>
  8050.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/1669#msg-1755</link>
  8051.                <description><![CDATA[That would really be nice.The only thing left would be to have different  global css styles for themes.At least I have no idea how I could use the correct class for the correct theme.Best regards,Daniel]]></description>
  8052.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Daniel Krüger Cosmo Consult)]]></author>
  8053.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/1669#msg-1755</guid>
  8054.                <pubDate>Sun, 15 May 2022 22:51:08 +0200</pubDate>
  8055.                            </item>
  8056.                    <item>
  8057.                
  8058.                <title><![CDATA[Feature: Delete Row (Item List)]]></title>
  8059.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/1739#msg-1754</link>
  8060.                <description><![CDATA[Hi,you could achieve this already if you can use a custom SDK. Theres a remove method. I havent tested it though.https://developer.webcon.com/2022/resources/sdk-reference/html/f3dee895-67d2-23bd-3604-ca349cc34159.htmBest regards,Daniel]]></description>
  8061.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Daniel Krüger Cosmo Consult)]]></author>
  8062.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/1739#msg-1754</guid>
  8063.                <pubDate>Sun, 15 May 2022 22:48:31 +0200</pubDate>
  8064.                            </item>
  8065.                    <item>
  8066.                
  8067.                <title><![CDATA[Deactivating Business Entities]]></title>
  8068.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/1750#msg-1750</link>
  8069.                <description><![CDATA[Hi, as it is not possible to delete unwanted business entities when there are instances with them being used in it would be nice to have a parameter to deactivate them to make them disappear in the BE-field.]]></description>
  8070.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Christian Amler)]]></author>
  8071.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/1750#msg-1750</guid>
  8072.                <pubDate>Thu, 12 May 2022 17:21:04 +0200</pubDate>
  8073.                            </item>
  8074.                    <item>
  8075.                
  8076.                <title><![CDATA[[FEATURE] Specific document version comparsion]]></title>
  8077.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/1746#msg-1749</link>
  8078.                <description><![CDATA[I would go even a step further and suggest to display the difference to a certain version right on the form.We recently worked on an RFP where they wanted to display certain changes/differences on the form.I did not verify, but i think for the time this feature is not available it should be doable with some custom javascript.What i would try is requesting the data of a history element. via XMLHttpRequest. The url looks like this one: /api/nav/db/1/app/7/element/22367/desktop?returnurl=%2Fdb%2F1%2Fapp%2F7&amp;historicalversion=292733. Then use the fields values returned in liteData -&gt; liteModel -&gt; viewModelsList, check for differences and present the changes in a nice way.]]></description>
  8079.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Markus Jenni)]]></author>
  8080.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/1746#msg-1749</guid>
  8081.                <pubDate>Thu, 12 May 2022 12:01:19 +0200</pubDate>
  8082.                            </item>
  8083.                    <item>
  8084.                
  8085.                <title><![CDATA[Custom css classes for input fields]]></title>
  8086.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/1669#msg-1748</link>
  8087.                <description><![CDATA[Hi Markus! Thanks for your reply. Yes, Im aware of Daniels solution and Im already using it in all my projects. However, its just a workaround. As you said, it would be much easier (and correct from a developer perspective) to target and style elements based on classes (or even custom data attributes) and not by having to combine that many selectors. Cheers,Martin]]></description>
  8088.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Martin Meze Freelancer)]]></author>
  8089.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/1669#msg-1748</guid>
  8090.                <pubDate>Thu, 12 May 2022 11:28:24 +0200</pubDate>
  8091.                            </item>
  8092.                    <item>
  8093.                
  8094.                <title><![CDATA[Custom css classes for input fields]]></title>
  8095.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/1669#msg-1747</link>
  8096.                <description><![CDATA[Hi MartinDaniel Krger shows how to implement uniform button styling in this post:https://daniels-notes.de/posts/2021/path-button-stylingThe same approach could also be used for fields.However, i would prefer having to possibility to add custom css classes to field name/value in addition to the current field name/value style option as you proposeTo be consistent, the custom css classes option should also be added to button style of the path.In conjunction with the global css styles it would be a huge benefit.]]></description>
  8097.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Markus Jenni)]]></author>
  8098.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/1669#msg-1747</guid>
  8099.                <pubDate>Thu, 12 May 2022 11:18:41 +0200</pubDate>
  8100.                            </item>
  8101.                    <item>
  8102.                
  8103.                <title><![CDATA[[FEATURE] Specific document version comparsion]]></title>
  8104.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/1746#msg-1746</link>
  8105.                <description><![CDATA[Hello,current version tracking tool in BPS is pretty good, but i&#039;m lacking one feature.Let&#039;s say we have a workflow, where i&#039;m at version 1, i need to get some more informations, so the document is being send to another people and new versions are being created 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 etc.After they will do their job, and i&#039;ll receive the document back in version 7 i want to be able to see all changes between version 1 and 7 (x, y).Instead of displaying incremental list of changes between, just show two columns with two chosen by user versions.I see it very usefull for huge forms, where tracking all the changes in each step takes more time.This way there could be a glance view about what changed, and then eventually i could check all te small changes between if needed.]]></description>
  8106.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Maksymilian Stachowiak)]]></author>
  8107.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/1746#msg-1746</guid>
  8108.                <pubDate>Thu, 12 May 2022 08:01:09 +0200</pubDate>
  8109.                            </item>
  8110.                    <item>
  8111.                
  8112.                <title><![CDATA[Feature: Delete Row (Item List)]]></title>
  8113.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/1739#msg-1741</link>
  8114.                <description><![CDATA[Wished i had this function just a few weeks ago. By using the Replace values option to delete a row, apart from having new values for DET_ID, also the history gets confusing because you can hardly see, which row had been removed.]]></description>
  8115.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Markus Jenni)]]></author>
  8116.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/1739#msg-1741</guid>
  8117.                <pubDate>Tue, 10 May 2022 15:04:24 +0200</pubDate>
  8118.                            </item>
  8119.                    <item>
  8120.                
  8121.                <title><![CDATA[Feature: Delete Row (Item List)]]></title>
  8122.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/1739#msg-1739</link>
  8123.                <description><![CDATA[Hi,As for now you have 3 options in Item List: add rows, update rows, and replace rows. But there is no option to delete row. It would be really handy especially if there are some flaws in process and some rows on item list that shouldn&#039;t be there. Now if you want to delete them by action you have to use Replace Values option with SQL Query that returns only rows, that you want to leave in the form, so other rows are going to be deleted. The problem is that every row is deleted and than rows from SQL Query are added so every row have new DET_ID.It would be nice, to have option to delete only rows that we want, and other rows will have there old DET_ID.]]></description>
  8124.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Jarosław Dziekan)]]></author>
  8125.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/1739#msg-1739</guid>
  8126.                <pubDate>Tue, 10 May 2022 12:34:58 +0200</pubDate>
  8127.                            </item>
  8128.                    <item>
  8129.                
  8130.                <title><![CDATA[Grant permission for users to access the rest api]]></title>
  8131.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/1713#msg-1733</link>
  8132.                <description><![CDATA[Hi DanielThank you for having a quick review.Best regardsMarkus]]></description>
  8133.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Markus Jenni)]]></author>
  8134.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/1713#msg-1733</guid>
  8135.                <pubDate>Mon, 09 May 2022 16:35:19 +0200</pubDate>
  8136.                            </item>
  8137.                    <item>
  8138.                
  8139.                <title><![CDATA[Grant permission for users to access the rest api]]></title>
  8140.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/1713#msg-1732</link>
  8141.                <description><![CDATA[Hi Markus,this is just a &quot;confirmation&quot; post. I have no solution.I also tried to use the REST-API dataimport with 2022 and received the same error &quot;invalid scope&quot;. Since I don&#039;t need to access the API at the moment I was content to postpone searching for an answer.Best regards,Daniel]]></description>
  8142.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Daniel Krüger Cosmo Consult)]]></author>
  8143.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/1713#msg-1732</guid>
  8144.                <pubDate>Mon, 09 May 2022 15:21:36 +0200</pubDate>
  8145.                            </item>
  8146.                    <item>
  8147.                
  8148.                <title><![CDATA[Grant permission for users to access the rest api]]></title>
  8149.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/1713#msg-1727</link>
  8150.                <description><![CDATA[Hi KamilWe are having some administrative tools where we don&#039;t want to use app registration. Browser based authentication would make the usage easier.Like PnP powershell has this option for authentication.In the link below you will find an extended version of the rest-api dataimporter, where i tried to implement a Use-Web-Login option. It works well so far, but as i wrote before, i receive a &quot;invalid scope&quot; exception when i use the extracted token.Could be that i missed some point.https://nexplore-my.sharepoint.com/:u:/g/personal/mj_nexplore_ch/EWnOFXi9WWRAgLeYiKomf1cBrkpyiUINJVRRa5jMP38Sbg?e=HcUPAIYou mentioned the UserContext and the authorization code and implicit grant flow. Where can i find documention about this options? Could they help to achieve what i want.]]></description>
  8151.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Markus Jenni)]]></author>
  8152.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/1713#msg-1727</guid>
  8153.                <pubDate>Mon, 09 May 2022 11:30:18 +0200</pubDate>
  8154.                            </item>
  8155.                    <item>
  8156.                
  8157.                <title><![CDATA[Grant permission for users to access the rest api]]></title>
  8158.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/1713#msg-1716</link>
  8159.                <description><![CDATA[Hi Markus, could you go a little further on the scenario you want to achieve?From what I understand, at the moment you have successfully get the token from the studio endpoint and want to use it for public api endpoints and hence the scope error.Regarding api support without dedicated accounts, I&#039;m pretty sure we&#039;ll always need registered apps, but that doesn&#039;t prevent you from using the api as a user.Before version 2022 and in lagacy apps, you could use impersonation for this, endpoint api/login should return all needed scopes. In the latest version, you can use UserContext and either the authorization code or implicit grant flow. However, both of these flows require user interaction.The only missing piece that might come in handy is some kind of delayed authentication flow where the user could accept all app consents, for example via a link from an email. Did you mean something like this?]]></description>
  8160.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Kamil Skrzypiec)]]></author>
  8161.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/1713#msg-1716</guid>
  8162.                <pubDate>Wed, 04 May 2022 13:57:03 +0200</pubDate>
  8163.                            </item>
  8164.                    <item>
  8165.                
  8166.                <title><![CDATA[Grant permission for users to access the rest api]]></title>
  8167.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/1713#msg-1713</link>
  8168.                <description><![CDATA[We created a set of powershell cmdlets to connect to a portal, start/update/delete workflows and adding attachments.  Inspired by the -UseWebLogin parameter off the Connect-PnPOnline cmdlet i extended our powershell cmdlets with a use weblogin feature. Fiddler and a bit of research in the web provided the right approach quite fast.Authentication works fine, but when using the rest api i receive an &quot;invalid scope&quot; exception.Seems that the rest api is only working with registered apps. Would be super cool having the possibility to grant permissions for using the rest api also for users and not only applications.Btw:I reused the code for the weblogin from my powershell and extendend https://github.com/WEBCON-BPS/RestApi-DataImporter, but....]]></description>
  8169.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Markus Jenni)]]></author>
  8170.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/1713#msg-1713</guid>
  8171.                <pubDate>Fri, 29 Apr 2022 13:28:40 +0200</pubDate>
  8172.                            </item>
  8173.                    <item>
  8174.                
  8175.                <title><![CDATA[HTTP]]></title>
  8176.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/1696#msg-1696</link>
  8177.                <description><![CDATA[HTTP logging in the mobile application - please come back!!!]]></description>
  8178.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (damian gąsienica-józkowy)]]></author>
  8179.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/1696#msg-1696</guid>
  8180.                <pubDate>Mon, 25 Apr 2022 17:35:41 +0200</pubDate>
  8181.                            </item>
  8182.                    <item>
  8183.                
  8184.                <title><![CDATA[Menuactions requesting parameters]]></title>
  8185.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/228#msg-1694</link>
  8186.                <description><![CDATA[I suggest, that this dialog action should also be available for path transitions. Reason: for better user experience it would make sense, showing a pop-up Dialog in order to change some values rather than showing a step in wizard mode to change these values.]]></description>
  8187.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Markus Jenni)]]></author>
  8188.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/228#msg-1694</guid>
  8189.                <pubDate>Mon, 25 Apr 2022 10:57:40 +0200</pubDate>
  8190.                            </item>
  8191.                    <item>
  8192.                
  8193.                <title><![CDATA[Custom css classes for input fields]]></title>
  8194.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/1669#msg-1669</link>
  8195.                <description><![CDATA[I think it would be useful to have the ability to apply custom css classes to input fields. With the current styling options there is no way to style the &quot;inside&quot; of the input controls.The last image is what I&#039;d expect to be able to do, the first 3 images are what is currently possible with out-of-the-box functionality. If that is already possible I&#039;d be happy to know how without having to target precise css classes, data attributes etc.]]></description>
  8196.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Martin Meze Freelancer)]]></author>
  8197.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/1669#msg-1669</guid>
  8198.                <pubDate>Wed, 13 Apr 2022 10:27:59 +0200</pubDate>
  8199.                            </item>
  8200.                    <item>
  8201.                
  8202.                <title><![CDATA[Datarow field into report]]></title>
  8203.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/1660#msg-1664</link>
  8204.                <description><![CDATA[Thank you Markus! You are absolutely right, we usually avoid using subqueries. But regarding Webcon reports you do not have many alternatives, and for smaller tables it can work really well. We can either store redundant data or use same query in calculated field, but in my opinion my proposal is still better, if performance is manageable.]]></description>
  8205.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (SIMON Péter)]]></author>
  8206.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/1660#msg-1664</guid>
  8207.                <pubDate>Mon, 11 Apr 2022 17:00:35 +0200</pubDate>
  8208.                            </item>
  8209.                    <item>
  8210.                
  8211.                <title><![CDATA[Datarow field into report]]></title>
  8212.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/1660#msg-1663</link>
  8213.                <description><![CDATA[Working with databases for a very long time, there is an alert being triggered when i hear subquery. Using subqueries in reports usually ends up in poor performance.So strongly advise against the usage of them.]]></description>
  8214.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Markus Jenni)]]></author>
  8215.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/1660#msg-1663</guid>
  8216.                <pubDate>Mon, 11 Apr 2022 14:03:25 +0200</pubDate>
  8217.                            </item>
  8218.                    <item>
  8219.                
  8220.                <title><![CDATA[OCR add text layer action improvement]]></title>
  8221.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/1662#msg-1662</link>
  8222.                <description><![CDATA[Dear Webcon Community!Problem: sometimes we get many page documents, but in most cases valuable information is on first few pages or last pagesProposal: new optional parameters in action What do you think?Thank you!BR,Peter]]></description>
  8223.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (SIMON Péter)]]></author>
  8224.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/1662#msg-1662</guid>
  8225.                <pubDate>Mon, 11 Apr 2022 11:22:48 +0200</pubDate>
  8226.                            </item>
  8227.                    <item>
  8228.                
  8229.                <title><![CDATA[Import excel action improvement]]></title>
  8230.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/1661#msg-1661</link>
  8231.                <description><![CDATA[Dear Webcon Community!Problem: with import excel action you can import excel tables only if you have a table container already added. Sometimes it is difficult if we want to process data in excel table coming from third party.Proposal: there is a way to define column mapping for itemlist file importing. It would be nice to have a feature in import action to take into account that one, instead of expecting a table in excel file.What do you think?Thank you!BR,Peter]]></description>
  8232.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (SIMON Péter)]]></author>
  8233.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/1661#msg-1661</guid>
  8234.                <pubDate>Mon, 11 Apr 2022 11:19:29 +0200</pubDate>
  8235.                            </item>
  8236.                    <item>
  8237.                
  8238.                <title><![CDATA[Datarow field into report]]></title>
  8239.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/1660#msg-1660</link>
  8240.                <description><![CDATA[Dear Webcon Community!Problem: you cannot use datarow fields on portal reports.Proposal: make it possible as it was a calculated field on report, running as subqueryWhat do you think?Thank you!BR,Peter]]></description>
  8241.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (SIMON Péter)]]></author>
  8242.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/1660#msg-1660</guid>
  8243.                <pubDate>Mon, 11 Apr 2022 11:17:51 +0200</pubDate>
  8244.                            </item>
  8245.                    <item>
  8246.                
  8247.                <title><![CDATA[Global Action scheduling improvement]]></title>
  8248.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/1659#msg-1659</link>
  8249.                <description><![CDATA[Dear Webcon Community!Problem: longer background processes has to be split to smaller parts to fit in transaction timeout limit. For example if you have to move 50-1000 instances each morning taking some minutes, we have to use &quot;select top &quot;  and run global action more often (eg. in every 10 minutes) Earlier (before BPS 2020), it was a once a day run.Proposal: have new GA setting to specify number of cycles it should perform after triggered by schedule. This way we can split big transactions, but still keep once a day schedule for global actions. (I know execution condition on action is a workaround, but still too many global action cycles)What do you think?Thank you!BR,Peter]]></description>
  8250.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (SIMON Péter)]]></author>
  8251.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/1659#msg-1659</guid>
  8252.                <pubDate>Mon, 11 Apr 2022 11:15:31 +0200</pubDate>
  8253.                            </item>
  8254.                    <item>
  8255.                
  8256.                <title><![CDATA[Invoke SOAP action improvement]]></title>
  8257.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/1658#msg-1658</link>
  8258.                <description><![CDATA[Dear Webcon Community!We have been working with Webcons BPS for 5 years, delivering several business solutions within a global company.We really like this platform however we have several proposals and ideas to make it better. I will share some of them in separate posts, sorry for flooding.Any comments, questions  or suggestions  are very welcomed. I would appreciate your vote!Problem: if you need to use SOAP and get back complex xml, sometimes mapping fails (multi level structures cannot be mapped)Proposal: similary to REST action, give possibility to get back whole respond xml. Then you have the chance to get content with SQL query. What do you think?Thank you!BR,Peter]]></description>
  8259.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (SIMON Péter)]]></author>
  8260.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/1658#msg-1658</guid>
  8261.                <pubDate>Mon, 11 Apr 2022 11:12:08 +0200</pubDate>
  8262.                            </item>
  8263.                    <item>
  8264.                
  8265.                <title><![CDATA[Mail approve improvement]]></title>
  8266.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/1657#msg-1657</link>
  8267.                <description><![CDATA[Dear Webcon Community!We have been working with Webcons BPS for 5 years, delivering several business solutions within a global company.We really like this platform however we have several proposals and ideas to make it better. I will share some of them in separate posts, sorry for flooding.Any comments, questions  or suggestions  are very welcomed. I would appreciate your vote!Problem: in case of mailapprove, approver sometimes enters some comments in email, which you cannot get back.Proposal: similarly to normal HMB, let&#039;s have some parameter-field mapping, to retrieve body of email.What do you think?Thank you!BR,Peter]]></description>
  8268.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (SIMON Péter)]]></author>
  8269.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/1657#msg-1657</guid>
  8270.                <pubDate>Mon, 11 Apr 2022 11:10:19 +0200</pubDate>
  8271.                            </item>
  8272.                    <item>
  8273.                
  8274.                <title><![CDATA[Use GUID identification in HTML Templates]]></title>
  8275.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/73#msg-1644</link>
  8276.                <description><![CDATA[Hi,When Can i be done? It&#039;s planned?]]></description>
  8277.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Hubert Chadaj)]]></author>
  8278.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/73#msg-1644</guid>
  8279.                <pubDate>Fri, 08 Apr 2022 10:02:27 +0200</pubDate>
  8280.                            </item>
  8281.                    <item>
  8282.                
  8283.                <title><![CDATA[Extended Audit capabilities]]></title>
  8284.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/1635#msg-1636</link>
  8285.                <description><![CDATA[After posting i came up with the thought of creating a custom http-module. Api requests for elements / reports would be sent to a queue and then asynchronously processed and written to the audit database by an audit app. So the impact on performance would be minimized.Maybe this is something any of the partner has done already?]]></description>
  8286.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Markus Jenni)]]></author>
  8287.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/1635#msg-1636</guid>
  8288.                <pubDate>Thu, 07 Apr 2022 13:35:24 +0200</pubDate>
  8289.                            </item>
  8290.                    <item>
  8291.                
  8292.                <title><![CDATA[Extended Audit capabilities]]></title>
  8293.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/1635#msg-1635</link>
  8294.                <description><![CDATA[We are coming across scenarios, where it is required to audit the views and not only changes on an element. Ideally we would be able to configure the audit level:- View element- View attachment- Download attachment- View in report (elements retrieved and displayed on reports)- Edit element- Delete elementAs additional auditing is likely to have performance impacts and also increase the database quite fast, it would be better to enable auditing on process level only. Maybe it would even make sense to log these entries in a separate audit database.]]></description>
  8295.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Markus Jenni)]]></author>
  8296.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/1635#msg-1635</guid>
  8297.                <pubDate>Thu, 07 Apr 2022 12:58:04 +0200</pubDate>
  8298.                            </item>
  8299.                    <item>
  8300.                
  8301.                <title><![CDATA[SQL Server - indexes]]></title>
  8302.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/1623#msg-1623</link>
  8303.                <description><![CDATA[Hello,Lately I was thinking about SQL optimization. So I did this query on production environments of our 4 random clients. The query shows where probably we should be thinking about putting index, because of high usage of those columns. Of course we all know that putting index on WFElements with attribute columns is not a good idea (maybe if you have secondary BPS_Content for only 1 process could be fine), but there are some examples on every environment that are in top 10 most highly recommended for index. And 4 of them are related to SOLR.You can find my &#039;research&#039; results here: https://nexpertis-my.sharepoint.com/:f:/g/personal/jaroslaw_dziekan_nexpertis_pl/EsIcZvxgjSJIrtGkGEJpVcABtvWxI57511tiTqDYHpD60A?e=ib6qHxSo my question is: Is there are some plans to create some of these indexes as a standard in Webcon BPS, and if not, is it safe (according to EULA) to create indexes in BPS_Content to improve performance?]]></description>
  8304.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Jarosław Dziekan)]]></author>
  8305.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/1623#msg-1623</guid>
  8306.                <pubDate>Tue, 05 Apr 2022 17:18:39 +0200</pubDate>
  8307.                            </item>
  8308.                    <item>
  8309.                
  8310.                <title><![CDATA[My tasks - sorting]]></title>
  8311.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/1581#msg-1581</link>
  8312.                <description><![CDATA[Dear Webcon Community :),Is it possible to add sort option to &quot;My tasks&quot;? By default it is sorted by Modification date in ascending order. My proposal is:1. It would be very useful if user can sort it by other standard fields like: Days/hours in step, Modifying person, Creation date, etc. 2. Switching between the direction of the selected sort (ascending/descending) would be great]]></description>
  8313.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (rohans)]]></author>
  8314.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/1581#msg-1581</guid>
  8315.                <pubDate>Wed, 30 Mar 2022 15:45:26 +0200</pubDate>
  8316.                            </item>
  8317.                    <item>
  8318.                
  8319.                <title><![CDATA[An action for generating a diynamic number of word files from different templates.]]></title>
  8320.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/1549#msg-1549</link>
  8321.                <description><![CDATA[At this pointthe only way to generate multiple word documents is to create multiple actions, or if you have a dynamic number of documents, you should use subworkflows. The second solution works alright when we are talking about 2-20 documents, but (I&#039;m not sure if all of you are aware) creating an new instance, ore moving it one step is a verry slow action and if you need to move or create 1000 instances using the default actions you will have to wait sometimes hours. Another problem is that the action is not multithreaded at all. We ave a custommer that needs about 1milion of documents to be generated once a month. That is a lot and using the actions it would take more than a month to finnish all the work. We have investigated how the reports quickpath functionality works (because it seemed to work multithreading) and we have notticed that it uses JS to send async all the instances via the API. So we are now using the API via sdk in order to start all tose subworkfols for generating word templates. The API is doing all the work multithreading and much faster than the builtin actions.]]></description>
  8322.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Razvan Ogrezeanu - ENCORSA Romania)]]></author>
  8323.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/1549#msg-1549</guid>
  8324.                <pubDate>Thu, 24 Mar 2022 10:08:27 +0100</pubDate>
  8325.                            </item>
  8326.                    <item>
  8327.                
  8328.                <title><![CDATA[Create multiple tasks in a plugin]]></title>
  8329.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/1534#msg-1534</link>
  8330.                <description><![CDATA[Hi,Why is only one task created, and everything executes in it, when I execute the following code in a loop:args.TransitionInfo.TasksToAdd.Add(new WebCon.WorkFlow.SDK.Common.Model.NewTaskData(new WebCon.WorkFlow.SDK.Common.Model.UserInfo(&quot;webcon&quot;, &quot;webcon&quot;)));Best regards.]]></description>
  8331.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Adam)]]></author>
  8332.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/1534#msg-1534</guid>
  8333.                <pubDate>Thu, 17 Mar 2022 16:47:13 +0100</pubDate>
  8334.                            </item>
  8335.                    <item>
  8336.                
  8337.                <title><![CDATA[Additional Filter All but... in reports]]></title>
  8338.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/1518#msg-1518</link>
  8339.                <description><![CDATA[The reporting and filter options of WEBCON BPS are already great. However we have customers who would like to have a filter &quot;all but...&quot; or &quot;not&quot; like we already have &quot;Begins&quot; and &quot;Contains&quot;.]]></description>
  8340.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Markus Jenni)]]></author>
  8341.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/1518#msg-1518</guid>
  8342.                <pubDate>Thu, 10 Mar 2022 17:47:13 +0100</pubDate>
  8343.                            </item>
  8344.                    <item>
  8345.                
  8346.                <title><![CDATA[[SOLVED] WEBCON: Update attachment action -&gt; Q: How to rename attachments WITH continous numbering ?]]></title>
  8347.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/699#msg-1505</link>
  8348.                <description><![CDATA[I just noticed that if you have more than 10 attachments that solution wouldn&#039;t work. I get the following error:&quot;Invalid configuration. The maximum number of consecutive transition paths that can be taken in one operation is 10.&quot;]]></description>
  8349.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Martin Meze Freelancer)]]></author>
  8350.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/699#msg-1505</guid>
  8351.                <pubDate>Mon, 07 Mar 2022 09:53:07 +0100</pubDate>
  8352.                            </item>
  8353.                    <item>
  8354.                
  8355.                <title><![CDATA[Option to generate/convert documents to pdf/a]]></title>
  8356.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/1504#msg-1504</link>
  8357.                <description><![CDATA[Currently Webcon BPS does not offer an action to convert pdf to pdf/a.As there is a rising request for documents in pdf/a format, it would be great having a built-in pdf to pdf/a conversion action.]]></description>
  8358.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Markus Jenni)]]></author>
  8359.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/1504#msg-1504</guid>
  8360.                <pubDate>Mon, 07 Mar 2022 09:41:27 +0100</pubDate>
  8361.                            </item>
  8362.                    <item>
  8363.                
  8364.                <title><![CDATA[Designer Desk: Adding dashboards]]></title>
  8365.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/1502#msg-1502</link>
  8366.                <description><![CDATA[Hi,it would be great if the creation of Dashboards could be added to the Designer Desk.Best regards,Daniel]]></description>
  8367.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Daniel Krüger Cosmo Consult)]]></author>
  8368.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/1502#msg-1502</guid>
  8369.                <pubDate>Fri, 04 Mar 2022 10:04:07 +0100</pubDate>
  8370.                            </item>
  8371.                    <item>
  8372.                
  8373.                <title><![CDATA[ITEM LIST ACTION buttons position in front column]]></title>
  8374.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/1481#msg-1483</link>
  8375.                <description><![CDATA[Hi Jegan,I would also prefer it if the actions could be displayed in the first column instead of the last one. Or at least to have it configurable.For the time being I have two tips for you:1. I don&#039;t know when this was added but you can limit the height  of the item list in the layouts tab. This way the Form doesn&#039;t get the &#039;large&#039;. It works really well. I&#039;ve noticed it in BPS 2022 but it may have been added in an earlier  version.2. I accidentally  discovered that holding this shift key and using the scroll whee of the mouse will let you scroll horizontally  left/right in some applications for example in edge. Best regards,Daniel]]></description>
  8376.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Daniel Krüger Cosmo Consult)]]></author>
  8377.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/1481#msg-1483</guid>
  8378.                <pubDate>Sun, 27 Feb 2022 11:11:24 +0100</pubDate>
  8379.                            </item>
  8380.                    <item>
  8381.                
  8382.                <title><![CDATA[ITEM LIST ACTION buttons position in front column]]></title>
  8383.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/1481#msg-1481</link>
  8384.                <description><![CDATA[Is it possible to have the Itemlist action buttons in front of the item list?As most of the times we have few hundred records and in case of do some action on the itemlist... we need to go to bottom of the item list and scroll to the right and do some action. After the action complets we do the same thing like go to bottom of the page scroll to right and do some action..Instead if we have the actions in begining of the itemlist will be good feature or please guide me how to achieve this.]]></description>
  8385.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Jegan Nathan)]]></author>
  8386.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/1481#msg-1481</guid>
  8387.                <pubDate>Sat, 26 Feb 2022 08:47:34 +0100</pubDate>
  8388.                            </item>
  8389.                    <item>
  8390.                
  8391.                <title><![CDATA[[Done] BPS 2022: Process configuration has been changed any chances to reduce these messages?]]></title>
  8392.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/1406#msg-1470</link>
  8393.                <description><![CDATA[I agree, this is somehow annoying and slows down testing/development. Suggestion: use the verification only when &quot;Process modified by export-import mechanism&quot; is checked]]></description>
  8394.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Markus Jenni)]]></author>
  8395.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/1406#msg-1470</guid>
  8396.                <pubDate>Thu, 24 Feb 2022 09:52:07 +0100</pubDate>
  8397.                            </item>
  8398.                    <item>
  8399.                
  8400.                <title><![CDATA[[Done] BPS 2022: Process configuration has been changed any chances to reduce these messages?]]></title>
  8401.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/1406#msg-1406</link>
  8402.                <description><![CDATA[Hi everyone,with the advent of BPS 2022 during the save/path transition of an workflow instance it will be checked, whether the latest version of a process matches the version whit which the instance has been retrieved. If you save the process in Designer Studio it will get a new version and you have to reload the page. You can no longer execute paths or even save the workflow instance.While I can understand the intention, it just annoys me because it slows down the development/testing:- You have an error in the path transition you need to fix? Sorry, please reload the form.- Oh you entered some data? Sorry, the process configuration has been changed, reload the form and enter the data again.- You are creating some query inside an action template/automation and need form field values in an instance? Sorry please reload.Are there any chances to make this a little less strict?Best regards,Daniel]]></description>
  8403.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Daniel Krüger Cosmo Consult)]]></author>
  8404.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/1406#msg-1406</guid>
  8405.                <pubDate>Wed, 16 Feb 2022 21:33:33 +0100</pubDate>
  8406.                            </item>
  8407.                    <item>
  8408.                
  8409.                <title><![CDATA[Delete or hide the System Dashboard]]></title>
  8410.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/1401#msg-1401</link>
  8411.                <description><![CDATA[It would be nice to have the ability to delete (or hide) the System Dashboard from the left menu.]]></description>
  8412.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Martin Meze Freelancer)]]></author>
  8413.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/1401#msg-1401</guid>
  8414.                <pubDate>Tue, 15 Feb 2022 15:29:45 +0100</pubDate>
  8415.                            </item>
  8416.                    <item>
  8417.                
  8418.                <title><![CDATA[Additional data range and/or focus option for Absence Chart]]></title>
  8419.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/1350#msg-1350</link>
  8420.                <description><![CDATA[For the absence chart, i&#039;m missing to the option to define the range of the chart. When using the absence chart in a leave request, i would like to see the range around my planned leave. Currently the user has to scroll, to see the right data. Thats why it would be great to be able to define a dynamic data range. Ideally we can configure start and end date some weeks before/after the dates of the leave request.In the configuration there is enough space to add an option to set start and end date for the absence chart.Alternatively we could also a kind of focused date, so that the range around this date is displayed rather than scrolling to this date.]]></description>
  8421.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Markus Jenni)]]></author>
  8422.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/1350#msg-1350</guid>
  8423.                <pubDate>Wed, 02 Feb 2022 12:33:06 +0100</pubDate>
  8424.                            </item>
  8425.                    <item>
  8426.                
  8427.                <title><![CDATA[Adding a conditional wizard mode]]></title>
  8428.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/1284#msg-1284</link>
  8429.                <description><![CDATA[Hi everyone,it would be great if we would have an additional option to the &quot;wizard mode&quot;.The implementation of the wizard mode always displays the current workflow upon path transition.At least I have quite often the situation, that I need a &quot;conditional wizard mode&quot;. This means, that the wizard mode depends on the new assigned person. If it&#039;s the same person as the current one, the workflow needs to be executed in a wizard mode. In all other cases it&#039;s not executed in a wizard mode. Of course the standard mail would only need to be send in the later case.I&#039;m currently using a workaround with a conditional &quot;hyperlink action&quot; and conditional &quot;send standard mail action&quot;. Thanks to the automations this will be easier with WEBCON BPS 2022 because I can move those two action to one automation (1). :)In case of someone is wondering about the hyperlink action, I added the configuration to the screenshot.Unfortunately the workaround has to be specific for the next step because I need to know the assigned persons. In a general solution it would be great, if this would also work if the workflow is assigned to multiple users. The mail would be send to all other users while the current user won&#039;t get a mail.Best regards,Daniel]]></description>
  8430.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Daniel Krüger Cosmo Consult)]]></author>
  8431.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/1284#msg-1284</guid>
  8432.                <pubDate>Mon, 24 Jan 2022 09:39:07 +0100</pubDate>
  8433.                            </item>
  8434.                    <item>
  8435.                
  8436.                <title><![CDATA[Mass e-mail notifications - 2022]]></title>
  8437.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/1258#msg-1258</link>
  8438.                <description><![CDATA[How to change by displaying everything, not only 4 tasks? - [|TaskDetailsTable:4|]How to change TaskDetailsTable?]]></description>
  8439.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (damian gąsienica-józkowy)]]></author>
  8440.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/1258#msg-1258</guid>
  8441.                <pubDate>Thu, 20 Jan 2022 10:53:07 +0100</pubDate>
  8442.                            </item>
  8443.                    <item>
  8444.                
  8445.                <title><![CDATA[Changes to grouping/filtering multi value picker fields]]></title>
  8446.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/1249#msg-1249</link>
  8447.                <description><![CDATA[Hi everyone,maybe I have a wrong idea how a multi value picker field is used in filters/groups in reports.Current situation:The picker field will store the selected values in the order they have been chosen. If you use this field as a group, every unique &quot;string&quot; will be used as a group. Example:  Workflow instance 1: IT: Research &amp; Development  Workflow instance 2: IT: Research &amp; Development;Quality Management  Workflow instance 3: IT: Research &amp; Development;Quality Management  Workflow instance 4: IT: Quality Management;Research &amp; Development;This will result in three groups, because the &quot;strings&quot; are different.   IT: Research &amp; Development  (1)   Research &amp; Development;Quality Management (2)  Quality Management;Research &amp; Development (1)This is a problem, from my perspective.As a user I don&#039;t care if the values have been selected in a specific order. So these groups should be reduced at least to these:  IT: Research &amp; Development (1)  IT: Research &amp; Development;Quality Management (3)But in the end I would be even more interested in displaying groups for each individual selected option and display all instances which uses the single values:  IT: Research &amp; Development (4) Quality Management (3)The same should apply to filters.At least this is my opinion, how a multi value picker should be filterable/groupable. Best regards,DanielVerified in BPS 2022]]></description>
  8448.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Daniel Krüger Cosmo Consult)]]></author>
  8449.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/1249#msg-1249</guid>
  8450.                <pubDate>Mon, 17 Jan 2022 17:31:29 +0100</pubDate>
  8451.                            </item>
  8452.                    <item>
  8453.                
  8454.                <title><![CDATA[Update variable id (field /rule references etc.) in translations during export/import]]></title>
  8455.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/1222#msg-1222</link>
  8456.                <description><![CDATA[Hi everyone,if you are going to use field references, process rules or similar in translations, these won&#039;t work once the process is transferred to another environment. See this thread for more details/images:https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/1149In my opinion this is an error, so I created a ticket. The answer was, that this is the intended behavior. There I&#039;m creating this user voice. :)Best regards,Daniel]]></description>
  8457.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Daniel Krüger Cosmo Consult)]]></author>
  8458.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/1222#msg-1222</guid>
  8459.                <pubDate>Fri, 07 Jan 2022 07:46:10 +0100</pubDate>
  8460.                            </item>
  8461.                    <item>
  8462.                
  8463.                <title><![CDATA[Add new process license]]></title>
  8464.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/1217#msg-1217</link>
  8465.                <description><![CDATA[We have license for only 2 webcon processes and purchased now another license. How can I add that new license?]]></description>
  8466.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Webcon_kaluser)]]></author>
  8467.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/1217#msg-1217</guid>
  8468.                <pubDate>Wed, 05 Jan 2022 23:44:16 +0100</pubDate>
  8469.                            </item>
  8470.                    <item>
  8471.                
  8472.                <title><![CDATA[Start different subworkflows in parallel]]></title>
  8473.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/1190#msg-1191</link>
  8474.                <description><![CDATA[Hi Alina,You can refer to this post regarding the general usage of the Subworkflow (SQL) action:https://community.webcon.com/posts/post/starting-workflows-in-webcon-bps-actions/76It uses an item list but in you case you only need to start always exactly four subworfklows. Perhaps there are four &quot;role&quot; people fields and each role should take care of its task.In this case I would do something like:Select &#039;RoleA&#039; as ResponsibleUnionSelect &#039;RoleB&#039; as ResponsibleUnionSelect &#039;RoleC&#039; as ResponsibleUnionSelect &#039;RoleD&#039; as ResponsibleWhere the responsible field is a field taken from the objects tab. The role is the field  value from the workflow instance.In case your subworkflows have a negative ending step and all subworkflows need to be finished, regardless of positiv or negative ending, before the parent workflow moves on, you need to use the advanced configuration. Advanced wait for sub workflow step configurationhttps://alterpaths.com/wait-for-sub-workflows-step-advanced-configuration/Best regards,Daniel]]></description>
  8475.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Daniel Krüger Cosmo Consult)]]></author>
  8476.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/1190#msg-1191</guid>
  8477.                <pubDate>Tue, 21 Dec 2021 10:54:04 +0100</pubDate>
  8478.                            </item>
  8479.                    <item>
  8480.                
  8481.                <title><![CDATA[Start different subworkflows in parallel]]></title>
  8482.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/1190#msg-1190</link>
  8483.                <description><![CDATA[Hi,I have this situation:- one main workflow- 4 different subworkflows that must start in parallel and wait until all subworkflows are done.I tried with Start a subworkflow action, but works for a single subworkflow.I don&#039;t want to use hyperlink.I must enter on the subworkflow in the start step.Is possible to start different subworkflows from a main workflow with SQL? I don&#039;t have an item list.I need to define an SQL action for each subworkflow?Can I have an example?Thanks]]></description>
  8484.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Alina Stana)]]></author>
  8485.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/1190#msg-1190</guid>
  8486.                <pubDate>Tue, 21 Dec 2021 09:44:44 +0100</pubDate>
  8487.                            </item>
  8488.                    <item>
  8489.                
  8490.                <title><![CDATA[Monospaced Font in text areas]]></title>
  8491.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/1165#msg-1165</link>
  8492.                <description><![CDATA[Hello everyone,having some experience in coding, makes it for me obvious that font used in text areas should be monospaced.Simply it&#039;s easier to read code, when it&#039;s monospaced. In attachment you can see and compare how that simple lines are better aligned, with monospaced font.When you edit some more complex SQL Queries, or when you deal with some custom HTML element - it would make life just easier.There is some question, how to deal with with those Webcon Variable blocks - how they should be aligned, but even forgetting about them, it&#039;s a nice to have.There is also a thread which might be connected: https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/74?messageid=74If there will be an in-webcon code editor, then the fonts will be probably also there.]]></description>
  8493.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Maksymilian Stachowiak)]]></author>
  8494.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/1165#msg-1165</guid>
  8495.                <pubDate>Mon, 13 Dec 2021 15:59:54 +0100</pubDate>
  8496.                            </item>
  8497.                    <item>
  8498.                
  8499.                <title><![CDATA[Display descriptions of parameters]]></title>
  8500.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/1113#msg-1162</link>
  8501.                <description><![CDATA[This idea sounds great, it could be used like tooltips displayed in any IDE.As i can see there is even already displayed description of whole rule, when you hover on the rule name/header, so adding description of specific parameters will fit with already existing feature.]]></description>
  8502.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Maksymilian Stachowiak)]]></author>
  8503.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/1113#msg-1162</guid>
  8504.                <pubDate>Fri, 10 Dec 2021 13:23:30 +0100</pubDate>
  8505.                            </item>
  8506.                    <item>
  8507.                
  8508.                <title><![CDATA[Expanding objects when clicking on variables in the designer]]></title>
  8509.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/1153#msg-1157</link>
  8510.                <description><![CDATA[This would be a nice feature and I will add another Christmas wish. :)When you are clicking on the Objects tab, the tree should expanded to the current application. At least in my case I&#039;m mostly using the Objects tab in rules / SQL commands to reference fields / form type / workflows which are part of some process of the application on which I&#039;m currently working. For global rules, data source etc. the tree wouldn&#039;t be expanded.]]></description>
  8511.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Daniel Krüger Cosmo Consult)]]></author>
  8512.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/1153#msg-1157</guid>
  8513.                <pubDate>Thu, 09 Dec 2021 09:21:10 +0100</pubDate>
  8514.                            </item>
  8515.                    <item>
  8516.                
  8517.                <title><![CDATA[Expanding objects when clicking on variables in the designer]]></title>
  8518.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/1153#msg-1153</link>
  8519.                <description><![CDATA[When using objects in the code editor and hover on top of them it shows you the location (Very usefull), but it would lower the ammounts of clicks and speed up the development if by doubleclicking or rightclicking on those, the menu on the right would expand automaticaly.]]></description>
  8520.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Razvan Ogrezeanu - ENCORSA Romania)]]></author>
  8521.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/1153#msg-1153</guid>
  8522.                <pubDate>Wed, 08 Dec 2021 09:01:47 +0100</pubDate>
  8523.                            </item>
  8524.                    <item>
  8525.                
  8526.                <title><![CDATA[Opening usages actions from usages window]]></title>
  8527.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/1151#msg-1151</link>
  8528.                <description><![CDATA[A feature we think will save a lot of time for our developers would be the ability to double click the on the usages actions and open those actions in a popup. All kind of ussages (Fields, Busines entities and so on...).]]></description>
  8529.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Razvan Ogrezeanu - ENCORSA Romania)]]></author>
  8530.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/1151#msg-1151</guid>
  8531.                <pubDate>Wed, 08 Dec 2021 08:11:14 +0100</pubDate>
  8532.                            </item>
  8533.                    <item>
  8534.                
  8535.                <title><![CDATA[Webcon 2021.1.3.188 Problem with parameters order in form rule]]></title>
  8536.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/1020#msg-1142</link>
  8537.                <description><![CDATA[Has been fixed with 2021.1.4.107 according to change log.]]></description>
  8538.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Daniel Krüger Cosmo Consult)]]></author>
  8539.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/1020#msg-1142</guid>
  8540.                <pubDate>Thu, 02 Dec 2021 19:23:20 +0100</pubDate>
  8541.                            </item>
  8542.                    <item>
  8543.                
  8544.                <title><![CDATA[Designer Desk CAL]]></title>
  8545.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/674#msg-1140</link>
  8546.                <description><![CDATA[sorry, i missed the point that you are already checke the configuration area of the Designer Desk]]></description>
  8547.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Thomas Dengler)]]></author>
  8548.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/674#msg-1140</guid>
  8549.                <pubDate>Wed, 01 Dec 2021 16:19:49 +0100</pubDate>
  8550.                            </item>
  8551.                    <item>
  8552.                
  8553.                <title><![CDATA[[SOLVED] ERROR in 2021.1.4.84: Emojis on Path-Buttons are only black (no more colors)]]></title>
  8554.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/1105#msg-1120</link>
  8555.                <description><![CDATA[ Thanks a lot ! Seems to be the solution -&gt; BOLD respectively &quot;font-weight: bold;&quot; was the problem. Lets wait, if this is corrected in the next Chrome/Chromium version.Typically IT that this problem arose parallel to the upgrade to 2021.1.4.84.Browsers tested and affected:Google Chrome Version 96.0.4664.45 (Offizieller Build) (64-Bit)EDGE Version 96.0.1054.34 (Offizielles Build) (64-Bit)Quick test with Safari on Iphone was successful also with bold.Thank you VERY much,Bjoern]]></description>
  8556.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Bjoern Poller)]]></author>
  8557.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/1105#msg-1120</guid>
  8558.                <pubDate>Thu, 25 Nov 2021 17:11:56 +0100</pubDate>
  8559.                            </item>
  8560.                    <item>
  8561.                
  8562.                <title><![CDATA[[SOLVED] ERROR in 2021.1.4.84: Emojis on Path-Buttons are only black (no more colors)]]></title>
  8563.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/1105#msg-1119</link>
  8564.                <description><![CDATA[Hi Bjoern,Are you using Google Chrome? If yes, see here: https://support.google.com/chrome/thread/136127348/chrome-bold-weight-emoji-broken-version-93-0-4664-45?hl=enCheers,Martin]]></description>
  8565.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Martin Meze Freelancer)]]></author>
  8566.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/1105#msg-1119</guid>
  8567.                <pubDate>Thu, 25 Nov 2021 16:38:13 +0100</pubDate>
  8568.                            </item>
  8569.                    <item>
  8570.                
  8571.                <title><![CDATA[Display descriptions of parameters]]></title>
  8572.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/1113#msg-1113</link>
  8573.                <description><![CDATA[Hi everyone,it would be nice if the description of a rule parameter would be displayed in addition to its type, when hovering above a parameter.Best regards,Daniel]]></description>
  8574.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Daniel Krüger Cosmo Consult)]]></author>
  8575.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/1113#msg-1113</guid>
  8576.                <pubDate>Tue, 23 Nov 2021 20:57:59 +0100</pubDate>
  8577.                            </item>
  8578.                    <item>
  8579.                
  8580.                <title><![CDATA[[SOLVED] WEBCON: Update attachment action -&gt; Q: How to rename attachments WITH continous numbering ?]]></title>
  8581.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/699#msg-1106</link>
  8582.                <description><![CDATA[Thank You very much. It worked like a charm :)]]></description>
  8583.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (jp)]]></author>
  8584.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/699#msg-1106</guid>
  8585.                <pubDate>Mon, 22 Nov 2021 08:27:20 +0100</pubDate>
  8586.                            </item>
  8587.                    <item>
  8588.                
  8589.                <title><![CDATA[[SOLVED] ERROR in 2021.1.4.84: Emojis on Path-Buttons are only black (no more colors)]]></title>
  8590.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/1105#msg-1105</link>
  8591.                <description><![CDATA[Good morning WEBCON team,we installed version 2021.1.4.84 last week and i found all my emojis used on path buttons are no longer with color but since the update only black.If its possible, please give me back the colors in the next version ;-).Thanks,Bjoern Poller]]></description>
  8592.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Bjoern Poller)]]></author>
  8593.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/1105#msg-1105</guid>
  8594.                <pubDate>Mon, 22 Nov 2021 07:51:07 +0100</pubDate>
  8595.                            </item>
  8596.                    <item>
  8597.                
  8598.                <title><![CDATA[[SOLVED] WEBCON: Update attachment action -&gt; Q: How to rename attachments WITH continous numbering ?]]></title>
  8599.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/699#msg-1075</link>
  8600.                <description><![CDATA[Hi jp,you are right. The parameter {ATT_NAME} is still a placeholder when the business rule is executed, unfortunately. I verified this using the SQL profiler. I also noticed, that this is only executed once for all attachments. So this isn&#039;t an option anyway.If you don&#039;t want to resort to a custom SDK action, you can do the following, to update the individual attachment names.- Create  a branch control which loops over the attachments. I added a field which is used as a counter.- Update the next attachment in each loopGetCurrentLoopAttachmentId sql commandselect Att_ID from (  select ATT_ID, ROW_NUMBER() OVER(ORDER BY ATT_ID ASC) AS RowNumber  from WFDataAttachmets  where ATT_WFDID = {WFD_ID}) as tempwhere  RowNumber = LOOPCOUNTERFIELDRemarks:Depending on the number of attachments there could be a timeout problem. I&#039;ve tested this with 2021.1.3.205 adding the Att_ID to the name. Since this works, yours should work, too. If you are using the same version I can send you the .bpe package. Best regards,Daniel]]></description>
  8601.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Daniel Krüger Cosmo Consult)]]></author>
  8602.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/699#msg-1075</guid>
  8603.                <pubDate>Sun, 07 Nov 2021 22:09:10 +0100</pubDate>
  8604.                            </item>
  8605.                    <item>
  8606.                
  8607.                <title><![CDATA[[SOLVED] WEBCON: Update attachment action -&gt; Q: How to rename attachments WITH continous numbering ?]]></title>
  8608.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/699#msg-1074</link>
  8609.                <description><![CDATA[Is there a simple solution to do a substring on attachement name ?The solution with business rule doesen&#039;t seem to work.I get only {ATT_NAME} as a result for every attachementselect cast(substring(ATT_name, nullif(charindex(&#039;_&#039;,ATT_name),1)+1,LEN(ATT_name)) as nvarchar)  from WFDataAttachmets where att_wfdid =  {BRP:5}  and Att_Name = N&#039;{BRP:4}&#039;]]></description>
  8610.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (jp)]]></author>
  8611.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/699#msg-1074</guid>
  8612.                <pubDate>Sun, 07 Nov 2021 15:44:49 +0100</pubDate>
  8613.                            </item>
  8614.                    <item>
  8615.                
  8616.                <title><![CDATA[Workflow preview generation]]></title>
  8617.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/810#msg-1067</link>
  8618.                <description><![CDATA[I just noticed, that the preview doesn&#039;t reflect the user language. It just uses the language of the current designer. If the language of the Designer Studio is en-Us and I provide a translation value for this language, it is ignored. Maybe this could be taken into account, too. :)Maybe the Designer Desk feature could be used for generating the preview?]]></description>
  8619.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Daniel Krüger Cosmo Consult)]]></author>
  8620.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/810#msg-1067</guid>
  8621.                <pubDate>Thu, 04 Nov 2021 07:54:10 +0100</pubDate>
  8622.                            </item>
  8623.                    <item>
  8624.                
  8625.                <title><![CDATA[Workflow preview generation]]></title>
  8626.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/810#msg-1065</link>
  8627.                <description><![CDATA[For the preview it would be useful to have a checkbox auto generate preview at each save.I support also the idea of a svg preview. Additionally it would be really nice if we were able to choose custom svg icons for steps.]]></description>
  8628.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Martin Meze Freelancer)]]></author>
  8629.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/810#msg-1065</guid>
  8630.                <pubDate>Wed, 03 Nov 2021 14:37:45 +0100</pubDate>
  8631.                            </item>
  8632.                    <item>
  8633.                
  8634.                <title><![CDATA[Add description for BPS groups]]></title>
  8635.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/1057#msg-1057</link>
  8636.                <description><![CDATA[It would be great having an additional field &quot;Description&quot; for local groups.]]></description>
  8637.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Markus Jenni)]]></author>
  8638.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/1057#msg-1057</guid>
  8639.                <pubDate>Tue, 02 Nov 2021 14:46:28 +0100</pubDate>
  8640.                            </item>
  8641.                    <item>
  8642.                
  8643.                <title><![CDATA[Extending Reports with external data]]></title>
  8644.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/1045#msg-1045</link>
  8645.                <description><![CDATA[When creating the reports it would be useful to have the option of joining the WFElements table to other external tables in order to show data from other systems in the same report without the need to duplicate this data on Webcon. This way the integrations with other systems would be even easier and there would be no need to duplicate data that already exist in some other system. Can you consider developing such functionality?]]></description>
  8646.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Martin Meze Freelancer)]]></author>
  8647.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/1045#msg-1045</guid>
  8648.                <pubDate>Thu, 28 Oct 2021 14:32:59 +0200</pubDate>
  8649.                            </item>
  8650.                    <item>
  8651.                
  8652.                <title><![CDATA[Grouping for datetime columns should show values according to column display option]]></title>
  8653.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/1040#msg-1040</link>
  8654.                <description><![CDATA[Hi,I have created a report, in which i am only interested in showing the Year-portion of a datetime-field.This works good until i try to group for the shown values in there. The groups are not built by the years in this case, but still on the entire value. It would make more sense to group according to the display option the grouped column is set to. Especially because i dont know how to do calculated columns in SOLR reports like i used to in SQL-reports. ;)I have attached a screenshot to make clear what i mean.]]></description>
  8655.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Christian Amler)]]></author>
  8656.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/1040#msg-1040</guid>
  8657.                <pubDate>Wed, 27 Oct 2021 18:53:33 +0200</pubDate>
  8658.                            </item>
  8659.                    <item>
  8660.                
  8661.                <title><![CDATA[Enable using camera for no mobile devices]]></title>
  8662.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/1037#msg-1037</link>
  8663.                <description><![CDATA[HI,I propose to add possibility to do photos from builded cameras in laps/computer/no mobile devices like mobile.So to not do photo, save it on device and now addind to element. But to add exact after to the photo by camera, and run camera from element.It&#039;s could by by custom action or use build funcionality. That problems show on Windows Surfface oraz normal windows where we can&#039;t use such functions.]]></description>
  8664.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Hubert Chadaj)]]></author>
  8665.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/1037#msg-1037</guid>
  8666.                <pubDate>Fri, 22 Oct 2021 06:42:10 +0200</pubDate>
  8667.                            </item>
  8668.                    <item>
  8669.                
  8670.                <title><![CDATA[Problem with  An item with the same key has already been added.]]></title>
  8671.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/1030#msg-1030</link>
  8672.                <description><![CDATA[Does anybody has such a problem &quot;An item with the same key has already been added.&quot;? It shows everywhere Leave of absence report is addedI changed the source of data ( distinct, top 1) and nothing has changed.]]></description>
  8673.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Marcin Cudny)]]></author>
  8674.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/1030#msg-1030</guid>
  8675.                <pubDate>Tue, 19 Oct 2021 09:46:37 +0200</pubDate>
  8676.                            </item>
  8677.                    <item>
  8678.                
  8679.                <title><![CDATA[Suggestion: WEBCON 2021 - New layout option for DASHBOARD [50%-25%-25%]]]></title>
  8680.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/1028#msg-1028</link>
  8681.                <description><![CDATA[Hello there,with working much more with compact start buttons, i am optimizing our older dashboard layouts.We have a few applications, which have many start buttons.So i was wondering, if, maybe, in further coming WEBCON versions there could be the possibility toadd 2 more &quot;section layouts&quot; like i posted in the picture. Mostly the usefull one would be: half side left,and two small columns in the right half.With this layout options designing dashboards and grouping buttons would work much better.Thanks,BjoernP.S.: Maybe i forgot the third version 25% - 50% - 25%, if someone want to place a central image.]]></description>
  8682.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Bjoern Poller)]]></author>
  8683.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/1028#msg-1028</guid>
  8684.                <pubDate>Sun, 17 Oct 2021 03:14:57 +0200</pubDate>
  8685.                            </item>
  8686.                    <item>
  8687.                
  8688.                <title><![CDATA[Webcon 2021.1.3.188 Problem with parameters order in form rule]]></title>
  8689.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/1020#msg-1026</link>
  8690.                <description><![CDATA[Daniel mentioned this kind of problem first: https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/960?messageid=960We have this problem with version 2021.1.4.55 on our stand-alone server too. 2 Parameters, both mixed up.As in Daniels post mentioned, WEBCON will fix this in the next version.Nice weekend,BjrnP.S.: We are trying to understand an other problem and will post it, when we could describe it:There could also be a problem with General Business Rules - in some cases the logic is lost and we only have &quot;Invalid Rule&quot; as contents. Copying the code manually back -&gt; ta-ta, it works again. So have a look there too.]]></description>
  8691.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Bjoern Poller)]]></author>
  8692.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/1020#msg-1026</guid>
  8693.                <pubDate>Sun, 17 Oct 2021 02:56:39 +0200</pubDate>
  8694.                            </item>
  8695.                    <item>
  8696.                
  8697.                <title><![CDATA[Buttons for Instance and Site link in notifications always visible if Instance and Site links are set to be Hidden]]></title>
  8698.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/1022#msg-1022</link>
  8699.                <description><![CDATA[In the notifications, if the user does not want to show the instance link and site link, the buttons keep showing up in the email but empty.If you want to erase them, the only option is to create a new template and discover in the HTML code where the buttons are configured.This makes no sense because the buttons don&#039;t have any other usage as showing the links so if the person chooses to hide them, it should behave as one compound only and not 2 separate things as the buttons alone, don&#039;t serve for anything at all.And the user might not know HTML code to understand what actually needs to be erased from the template, this should be user-friendly and adapted for all types of knowledge.]]></description>
  8700.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Andreia Correia)]]></author>
  8701.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/1022#msg-1022</guid>
  8702.                <pubDate>Sat, 16 Oct 2021 03:12:17 +0200</pubDate>
  8703.                            </item>
  8704.                    <item>
  8705.                
  8706.                <title><![CDATA[Webcon 2021.1.3.188 Problem with parameters order in form rule]]></title>
  8707.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/1020#msg-1020</link>
  8708.                <description><![CDATA[Hi there, I have observed the problem. During the transfer between DEV-TEST-PROD environments  there is an uncontrolled change in the order of formal parameters in the form rules. This results wrong assigning the actual parameters when the rule was called after import.]]></description>
  8709.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Wiesław Grządziel)]]></author>
  8710.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/1020#msg-1020</guid>
  8711.                <pubDate>Fri, 15 Oct 2021 19:58:30 +0200</pubDate>
  8712.                            </item>
  8713.                    <item>
  8714.                
  8715.                <title><![CDATA[WebCon 2021.1.4.55 Misbehaviour Form Field - Floating Point number]]></title>
  8716.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/998#msg-998</link>
  8717.                <description><![CDATA[Dear WebCon Team,in our view, we found following misbehaviour of the form field typ - Floating Point. If you try to set this field with a periodical fraction like (14/15)*100 = 93,333333... you will get an error message. In our oppinion this is a misbehaviour, because the field itself should handle such an &quot;exception&quot;. And it is hard to find ;)A possible solution is to wrap the &quot;Round&quot; function around the rule/result before setting the value to the field.Could you please check, if this could be fixed or it is an intended behaviour?Thanks a lot]]></description>
  8718.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Thomas Dengler)]]></author>
  8719.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/998#msg-998</guid>
  8720.                <pubDate>Mon, 11 Oct 2021 20:08:26 +0200</pubDate>
  8721.                            </item>
  8722.                    <item>
  8723.                
  8724.                <title><![CDATA[Standard Function Attachments count does not work any longer in 2021.1.4.55 on Start - Step]]></title>
  8725.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/969#msg-995</link>
  8726.                <description><![CDATA[This is a bug, it will be fixed in the next version.]]></description>
  8727.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Mateusz Kunior)]]></author>
  8728.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/969#msg-995</guid>
  8729.                <pubDate>Thu, 07 Oct 2021 23:15:41 +0200</pubDate>
  8730.                            </item>
  8731.                    <item>
  8732.                
  8733.                <title><![CDATA[API, or any other kind of automatic deployment from one environment to another.]]></title>
  8734.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/788#msg-994</link>
  8735.                <description><![CDATA[There are indeed customers out there, who would like to use DevOps for deployments.We are currently taking part at a tender, where they also ask for Azure DevOps integration.]]></description>
  8736.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Markus Jenni)]]></author>
  8737.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/788#msg-994</guid>
  8738.                <pubDate>Thu, 07 Oct 2021 18:14:44 +0200</pubDate>
  8739.                            </item>
  8740.                    <item>
  8741.                
  8742.                <title><![CDATA[Workflow preview generation]]></title>
  8743.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/810#msg-980</link>
  8744.                <description><![CDATA[I would appreciate an improvement of the generated preview. Maybe it should be considered to create a vector based image, e.g. svg, so the user has the possibility to zoom-in when required.]]></description>
  8745.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Markus Jenni)]]></author>
  8746.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/810#msg-980</guid>
  8747.                <pubDate>Sat, 02 Oct 2021 01:21:26 +0200</pubDate>
  8748.                            </item>
  8749.                    <item>
  8750.                
  8751.                <title><![CDATA[Standard Function Attachments count does not work any longer in 2021.1.4.55 on Start - Step]]></title>
  8752.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/969#msg-969</link>
  8753.                <description><![CDATA[Dear WebCon Team,we just updated to 2021.1.4.55 and recognized, that the so long working function &quot;Attachments Count&quot; does not work properly any longer on the intital step of a workflow as long there is no Instance ID.For Example I would like to validate if there is an attachment uploaded or not (see picture).If I do a path on the step itself --&gt; Instance ID --&gt; the rule works fine!!!I think it is a bug.Thanks a lot]]></description>
  8754.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Thomas Dengler)]]></author>
  8755.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/969#msg-969</guid>
  8756.                <pubDate>Fri, 01 Oct 2021 01:38:30 +0200</pubDate>
  8757.                            </item>
  8758.                    <item>
  8759.                
  8760.                <title><![CDATA[DASHBOARD changes from 2021.1.3.434 to 2021.1.4.55: The space for start button text is now far too limited]]></title>
  8761.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/967#msg-967</link>
  8762.                <description><![CDATA[Hi,we just did the upgrade from 2021.1.3.434 to 2021.1.4.55:One of the changes also concerns the look of the start buttons on dashboards.Because we like to use longer names, we now have a little problem with the limitation of space as you can see in the attached picture.Maybe in upcoming versions it is possible to rethink this change.Thanks in advance,Bjoern Poller]]></description>
  8763.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Bjoern Poller)]]></author>
  8764.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/967#msg-967</guid>
  8765.                <pubDate>Fri, 01 Oct 2021 00:23:52 +0200</pubDate>
  8766.                            </item>
  8767.                    <item>
  8768.                
  8769.                <title><![CDATA[PORTAL changes from 2021.1.3.434 to 2021.1.4.55:  The space for application names is now far too limited]]></title>
  8770.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/966#msg-966</link>
  8771.                <description><![CDATA[Hi,we just did the upgrade from 2021.1.3.434 to 2021.1.4.55:One of the changes also concerns the look of the portal elements.Because we like to use longer application names, we now have a little problem with the limitation of space as you can see in the attached picture.Maybe in upcoming versions it is possible to rethink this change.Thanks in advance,Bjoern Poller]]></description>
  8772.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Bjoern Poller)]]></author>
  8773.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/966#msg-966</guid>
  8774.                <pubDate>Fri, 01 Oct 2021 00:14:58 +0200</pubDate>
  8775.                            </item>
  8776.                    <item>
  8777.                
  8778.                <title><![CDATA[Item list: Single row editing improvements]]></title>
  8779.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/123#msg-948</link>
  8780.                <description><![CDATA[If the next/previous buttons get ever implemented, there should also be an option to configure/force field validation.]]></description>
  8781.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Daniel Krüger Cosmo Consult)]]></author>
  8782.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/123#msg-948</guid>
  8783.                <pubDate>Mon, 27 Sep 2021 22:58:23 +0200</pubDate>
  8784.                            </item>
  8785.                    <item>
  8786.                
  8787.                <title><![CDATA[Possibility to configure minimal amount of letters in search panel of reports]]></title>
  8788.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/928#msg-928</link>
  8789.                <description><![CDATA[Reports have a nice feature, which forces people to submit a search before showing results. However it is possible to submit the search without entering anything. So all result would be returned. It would be a great feature to configure a minimal amount of letter to enter before being able to submit the search.]]></description>
  8790.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Markus Jenni)]]></author>
  8791.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/928#msg-928</guid>
  8792.                <pubDate>Sat, 18 Sep 2021 02:50:45 +0200</pubDate>
  8793.                            </item>
  8794.                    <item>
  8795.                
  8796.                <title><![CDATA[Subworkflow SQL - Saving the ID]]></title>
  8797.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/910#msg-920</link>
  8798.                <description><![CDATA[In my cases, the source data for the initial form data of subworkflows started via SQL, is usually kept in an itemslist. I&#039;m storing the row-id (DET_ID) in a technical field of the subworkflow.When the subworkflow has been started, i&#039;m writing the workflow-id back to the itemslist row. The write-back is done via SQL Update statement. This way i have a link from itemslist row to the subworkflow and back.However, the approach with SQL update statement does not provide a history of changes. But until now, i never had the requirement to have this history.In cases you need to maintain history of changes, it would be better to update the row via the Rest-API.]]></description>
  8799.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Markus Jenni)]]></author>
  8800.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/910#msg-920</guid>
  8801.                <pubDate>Wed, 15 Sep 2021 19:01:31 +0200</pubDate>
  8802.                            </item>
  8803.                    <item>
  8804.                
  8805.                <title><![CDATA[Updates to BPS Translation Tool]]></title>
  8806.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/906#msg-919</link>
  8807.                <description><![CDATA[I just noticed a small issue. Some characters in the path will prevent the start of the application.After changing the folder name fromC:\install\WEBCON.BPS.TranslationImportExport.34toC:\#install\WEBCON.BPS.TranslationImportExport.34the .exe chrashes without an error message. Error from event log:Application: WEBCON.BPS.TranslationImportExport.exeFramework Version: v4.0.30319Description: The process was terminated due to an unhandled exception.Exception Info: System.IO.FileNotFoundException   at ..(System.String, System.Reflection.Assembly)   at ..(System.String, System.Reflection.Assembly)   at Aspose.Cells.License.SetLicense(System.String)   at WEBCON.BPS.TranslationImportExport.Form1..ctor()   at WEBCON.BPS.TranslationImportExport.Program.Main()Best regards,Daniel]]></description>
  8808.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Daniel Krüger Cosmo Consult)]]></author>
  8809.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/906#msg-919</guid>
  8810.                <pubDate>Tue, 14 Sep 2021 23:13:01 +0200</pubDate>
  8811.                            </item>
  8812.                    <item>
  8813.                
  8814.                <title><![CDATA[Subworkflow SQL - Saving the ID]]></title>
  8815.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/910#msg-910</link>
  8816.                <description><![CDATA[When the user sets up a Subworkflow using the SQL version, it&#039;s not possible to save the ID of the instance created. This is only allowed doing other type of actions and most of the times returning Concurrency Errors in the system.This is allowed already in the Subworkflow normal version.]]></description>
  8817.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Andreia Correia)]]></author>
  8818.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/910#msg-910</guid>
  8819.                <pubDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2021 01:03:32 +0200</pubDate>
  8820.                            </item>
  8821.                    <item>
  8822.                
  8823.                <title><![CDATA[Designer Studio: Adding windows spell checking]]></title>
  8824.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/908#msg-908</link>
  8825.                <description><![CDATA[Hi everyone,I&#039;m not sure whether I&#039;m the only one, but I got so used to the native spell checking of Windows that I tend to forget to the spelling.  Sometimes it happens because I make a mistake and sometimes it happens because of latency or other issues in an RDP session. Currently I&#039;m using the BPS translation tool and checking the texts in word. I&#039;m wondering if native Windows spell check could be added to the Designer Studio:https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/dotnet/api/system.windows.controls.spellcheck?view=net-5.0In my opinion the most relevant places are those which are visible to the normal end user, so not necessarily in the admin view. These are:- all parts which can be translated - E-Mails- Error messagesAre there any other places? If I&#039;m not the only one, I think this could save a lot of time for all.Best regards,Daniel]]></description>
  8826.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Daniel Krüger Cosmo Consult)]]></author>
  8827.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/908#msg-908</guid>
  8828.                <pubDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2021 00:53:19 +0200</pubDate>
  8829.                            </item>
  8830.                    <item>
  8831.                
  8832.                <title><![CDATA[Updates to BPS Translation Tool]]></title>
  8833.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/906#msg-906</link>
  8834.                <description><![CDATA[Hi everyone,I would be glad if the following changes would be implemented:1. Adding the new Input placeholder2. In case of data tables the display name should be used instead of the column name. This is especially a problem if the data source is a BPS internal view. WFD_AttChoose1 isn&#039;t really helpful for translating. :)3. There&#039;s a slight labeling issue. The PathAndTasks sheet doesn&#039;t contain the correct label for object type 33. It should be PathDocumentation instead of PathDescription. Currently &quot;PathDe[s]cription&quot; is duplicated.4. Buttons are not part of the generated file. At least I didn&#039;t find any.Could multi language pickers be listed separately? I don&#039;t believe that the translations could be handled by the export/import but if the excel would contain a list it would be easier to check. Ok, this is really a low priority wish. :)Btw. is there any change to open source the project without Aspose, so that we could find an alternative for it and introduce these changes ourselves?Does someone else have any other wishes? :)Best regards,Daniel]]></description>
  8835.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Daniel Krüger Cosmo Consult)]]></author>
  8836.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/906#msg-906</guid>
  8837.                <pubDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2021 00:31:12 +0200</pubDate>
  8838.                            </item>
  8839.                    <item>
  8840.                
  8841.                <title><![CDATA[Webcon Portal - export to Excel from Data table bug?]]></title>
  8842.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/873#msg-877</link>
  8843.                <description><![CDATA[See https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/40/15 it is actually 999 lines and one line for the header ;)Webcon tagged the request with &quot;not now&quot;.We had the same issues. I guess it has something to do with server ressources, and users being able to crash the server when exporting huge data-sets. Problem I had here is that it is not documented anywhere, and you cannot raise the limit.We solved it with an external ETL tool (FME) parametrized workspace that is triggered from a button in webcon, extracts the data with the filter parameters directly from the DB and downloads the resulting excel sheet to the browser.]]></description>
  8844.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Christian Amler)]]></author>
  8845.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/873#msg-877</guid>
  8846.                <pubDate>Fri, 27 Aug 2021 20:35:02 +0200</pubDate>
  8847.                            </item>
  8848.                    <item>
  8849.                
  8850.                <title><![CDATA[Webcon Portal - export to Excel from Data table bug?]]></title>
  8851.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/873#msg-873</link>
  8852.                <description><![CDATA[Data table attribute gives opportunity to export containing data to Excel using its default configuration, the sole problem is it can only export top 1000 rows, when its quite common to display bigger chunks of data in that form field. Documentation that redirects to below website doesn&#039;t mention anything about such limit:https://howto.webcon.com/exporting-a-data-table-form-field-to-an-excel-file/I am aware of alternatives such as user actions / sdk, but it is about using built-in functionality that ensures consistency and is ready to go with a single click.Tested on version 2021.1.3.205.]]></description>
  8853.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (MatthewT)]]></author>
  8854.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/873#msg-873</guid>
  8855.                <pubDate>Fri, 27 Aug 2021 19:20:55 +0200</pubDate>
  8856.                            </item>
  8857.                    <item>
  8858.                
  8859.                <title><![CDATA[Form rule foreach line in item list expanded functionality]]></title>
  8860.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/865#msg-872</link>
  8861.                <description><![CDATA[Yeah, *clapping hands*Damn this means I have some work to do removing my workaround as well as updating some blog posts. But it will be worth it. :)]]></description>
  8862.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Daniel Krüger Cosmo Consult)]]></author>
  8863.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/865#msg-872</guid>
  8864.                <pubDate>Fri, 27 Aug 2021 05:49:59 +0200</pubDate>
  8865.                            </item>
  8866.                    <item>
  8867.                
  8868.                <title><![CDATA[Form rule foreach line in item list expanded functionality]]></title>
  8869.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/865#msg-871</link>
  8870.                <description><![CDATA[Hold this discussion for a week please. WEBCON BPS 2021 R4 version is coming.&quot;[Portal]Added the ability to define global CSS styles. Styles can be defined in mostpages on Portal (forms, reports, dashboards, administration panel, embeddedelements). &quot;]]></description>
  8871.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Pawel Jawien WEBCON)]]></author>
  8872.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/865#msg-871</guid>
  8873.                <pubDate>Thu, 26 Aug 2021 22:28:18 +0200</pubDate>
  8874.                            </item>
  8875.                    <item>
  8876.                
  8877.                <title><![CDATA[Form rule foreach line in item list expanded functionality]]></title>
  8878.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/865#msg-870</link>
  8879.                <description><![CDATA[Hi Razvan,the reason why I replied here is, that it looks to others, as if those tasks couldn&#039;t be solved with low code options. If I remember correctly it&#039;s possible but not necessarily obvious. So enhancing this could be good. :)The coloring/tagging is nice even if this is manual action. One request hat the tag started or similar but it was already implement according to the change log.I wish you could filter those tags or exclude those with a tag from the default view. Or getting a notification when a tag is changed on your (voted) request.In general I&#039;m not sure how well the up/down votes work. I can&#039;t imagine that someone new will go through all request and vote. Regarding comments/updates, there are probably at least five lists which would have to be maintained: User voice, support, internal user voice (probably), product owner feature list, backlog. Keeping the internal ones in sync may be possible. Those external list though will require some &quot;Translation&quot; and therefore manual work. Commit message: I hope this will finally fix this .... :) Maybe you could ask your team how they would feal about this. ;)So, in the end sure I would like to know more about the progress on tagged requests, but I do understand it why it&#039;s not happening. :)Best regards,Daniel]]></description>
  8880.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Daniel Krüger Cosmo Consult)]]></author>
  8881.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/865#msg-870</guid>
  8882.                <pubDate>Thu, 26 Aug 2021 22:03:25 +0200</pubDate>
  8883.                            </item>
  8884.                    <item>
  8885.                
  8886.                <title><![CDATA[Form rule foreach line in item list expanded functionality]]></title>
  8887.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/865#msg-869</link>
  8888.                <description><![CDATA[Hi Daniel,I know how to do it with JavaScript. I will  have a look at other ways of doing it as well. If that was the case, I would have posted on the forum. I have added this functionality here on the user voice because I think it would be a nice addition to the already fresh and existing foreach functionality. :PAnd on another side, maybe a little unrelated, what is your opinion about the way this additions are handled? I love that the colored tags were added and you know the progress of your suggestion, but don&#039;t you think that WEBCON should also post some comments related to the subjects? I&#039;ll probably do another suggestion about that.]]></description>
  8889.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Razvan Ogrezeanu - ENCORSA Romania)]]></author>
  8890.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/865#msg-869</guid>
  8891.                <pubDate>Thu, 26 Aug 2021 18:03:38 +0200</pubDate>
  8892.                            </item>
  8893.                    <item>
  8894.                
  8895.                <title><![CDATA[Form rule foreach line in item list expanded functionality]]></title>
  8896.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/865#msg-867</link>
  8897.                <description><![CDATA[Hi Razvan,there&#039;s no need for a form rule in your case, as far as as the disabling is concerned:https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/764I also have an item list with a column which color is styling depends on it&#039;s value, which is calculated based on other fields without resorting to JavaScript. If this is not possible within the for each function. I probably created the rule in the on value change of the source fields, created a general form rule and used this in the for each during form load.Unfortunately I won&#039;t be able to have a look before Monday.If you need to resort to JavaScript for some reason, you can take a look here:https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/552/15I added a sample how you can call your JavaScript function within the for each so that you can access the current row.Best regards,Daniel]]></description>
  8898.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Daniel Krüger Cosmo Consult)]]></author>
  8899.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/865#msg-867</guid>
  8900.                <pubDate>Thu, 26 Aug 2021 07:17:35 +0200</pubDate>
  8901.                            </item>
  8902.                    <item>
  8903.                
  8904.                <title><![CDATA[Form rule foreach line in item list expanded functionality]]></title>
  8905.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/865#msg-865</link>
  8906.                <description><![CDATA[It was a  great addition when the foreach functionality was added in form rules for item lists, but they seem to be limited only to get and set values. There are plenty of reasons for witch you could need to disable a field or color ii differently using form rules. It would be great if styling fields with the foreach functionality would also be possible.I have attached an example where the fields marked with yellow should be disabled if the checkbox on the row is checked.]]></description>
  8907.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Razvan Ogrezeanu - ENCORSA Romania)]]></author>
  8908.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/865#msg-865</guid>
  8909.                <pubDate>Thu, 26 Aug 2021 02:42:16 +0200</pubDate>
  8910.                            </item>
  8911.                    <item>
  8912.                
  8913.                <title><![CDATA[Increase the length limit of regex validation.]]></title>
  8914.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/860#msg-864</link>
  8915.                <description><![CDATA[Yes, please!And if possible not only in the Formfield configuration, but also in the OCR-Templates.]]></description>
  8916.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Christian Amler)]]></author>
  8917.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/860#msg-864</guid>
  8918.                <pubDate>Wed, 25 Aug 2021 20:28:29 +0200</pubDate>
  8919.                            </item>
  8920.                    <item>
  8921.                
  8922.                <title><![CDATA[Increase the length limit of regex validation.]]></title>
  8923.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/860#msg-860</link>
  8924.                <description><![CDATA[Is there a reason behind 100 characters regex limitation?I was trying to use a regex for validation of Romanian personal identification numbers (CNP) and I got the following error attached.I think this limit should be increased a little.]]></description>
  8925.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Razvan Ogrezeanu - ENCORSA Romania)]]></author>
  8926.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/860#msg-860</guid>
  8927.                <pubDate>Wed, 25 Aug 2021 03:19:03 +0200</pubDate>
  8928.                            </item>
  8929.                    <item>
  8930.                
  8931.                <title><![CDATA[Suggestion: DESIGNER DESK - not allowing to place more than one START STEP]]></title>
  8932.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/858#msg-858</link>
  8933.                <description><![CDATA[Hi there,by using the Designer Desk in 2021.1.3.205 our user made the mistake to use multiple START STEPswhile designing a workflow for us.Also it is not possiple to save this work, it would be better, if the user gets an error message, if he/shewants to place another START STEP or it doesnt work at all (like in the Designer Studio).Bye,Bjoern Poller]]></description>
  8934.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Bjoern Poller)]]></author>
  8935.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/858#msg-858</guid>
  8936.                <pubDate>Tue, 24 Aug 2021 20:28:53 +0200</pubDate>
  8937.                            </item>
  8938.                    <item>
  8939.                
  8940.                <title><![CDATA[Little translation error: PORTAL (2021.1.3.205) -&gt; Favorites in German version not translated]]></title>
  8941.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/857#msg-857</link>
  8942.                <description><![CDATA[Hi there,just a little &quot;error&quot; -&gt; German version: &#039;Favorites&#039; are not translated into &#039;Favoriten&#039;.Have a nice day,Bjoern Poller]]></description>
  8943.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Bjoern Poller)]]></author>
  8944.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/857#msg-857</guid>
  8945.                <pubDate>Tue, 24 Aug 2021 20:16:21 +0200</pubDate>
  8946.                            </item>
  8947.                    <item>
  8948.                
  8949.                <title><![CDATA[Views of instances]]></title>
  8950.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/850#msg-852</link>
  8951.                <description><![CDATA[Hi Razvan,if the customer uses windows authentication you can probably make use of the IIS logs. In this case the user name is part of a log entry, if I remember correctly. You could periodically parse them, write the result to a database and show the results for the current URL. I&#039;m not sure, whether there is a (support way) to achieve this, if another mechanism is used. I was thinking about adding HttpModules to extract the name from the token, but than this is a .net core application. I&#039;ve no idea if this would even be possible.I&#039;m linking a similar request:https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/271/15Best regards,Daniel]]></description>
  8952.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Daniel Krüger Cosmo Consult)]]></author>
  8953.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/850#msg-852</guid>
  8954.                <pubDate>Mon, 23 Aug 2021 21:52:48 +0200</pubDate>
  8955.                            </item>
  8956.                    <item>
  8957.                
  8958.                <title><![CDATA[Views of instances]]></title>
  8959.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/850#msg-851</link>
  8960.                <description><![CDATA[The main reason behind that was fraud detection in insurance and banking industries.]]></description>
  8961.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Razvan Ogrezeanu - ENCORSA Romania)]]></author>
  8962.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/850#msg-851</guid>
  8963.                <pubDate>Mon, 23 Aug 2021 21:16:31 +0200</pubDate>
  8964.                            </item>
  8965.                    <item>
  8966.                
  8967.                <title><![CDATA[Views of instances]]></title>
  8968.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/850#msg-850</link>
  8969.                <description><![CDATA[Hi,We have encountered a 2nd customer asking us for the following functionality: When a user is opening an instance from a report, a list with all the users who viewed the data should be available. I am not sure how that could be handled when users preview a report, as the reports could contain all the data from the instances. That functionality should probably be added on the reports somehow, but that is just my brain talking loudly.]]></description>
  8970.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Razvan Ogrezeanu - ENCORSA Romania)]]></author>
  8971.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/850#msg-850</guid>
  8972.                <pubDate>Mon, 23 Aug 2021 20:55:59 +0200</pubDate>
  8973.                            </item>
  8974.                    <item>
  8975.                
  8976.                <title><![CDATA[Visual cue for closed threads]]></title>
  8977.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/828#msg-828</link>
  8978.                <description><![CDATA[Hi,ist there any chance to display a visual cue, like in the user voice, when a thread is closed?Currently the only hint is, that the &quot;Add Post&quot; button is not available, even after logging in.This may be ok, if you know how things work here but for newcomers this won&#039;t be so easy to understand.Best regards, Daniel]]></description>
  8979.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Daniel Krüger Cosmo Consult)]]></author>
  8980.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/828#msg-828</guid>
  8981.                <pubDate>Thu, 19 Aug 2021 21:01:38 +0200</pubDate>
  8982.                            </item>
  8983.                    <item>
  8984.                
  8985.                <title><![CDATA[Picker: Same configuration options for Internal View, Dictionary and Template data sources]]></title>
  8986.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/820#msg-824</link>
  8987.                <description><![CDATA[Hi Sebastian,that would be great, although I would have choose one of the following approaches, depending on which is easier to implement.a) Adding a new &quot;type&quot; &quot;Instance Id&quot; to the picker column configuration. If a column is mapped to this type an &quot;open element&quot; is rendered, using the value of the column as an id and the column value of type &#039;Name&#039; as a display name.b) The data table and data row have an option to define how an &#039;instance link&#039; should be created. Maybe this could be added to the picker configuration.I&#039;ve attached two pictures in hope it makes my suggestion better to understand. :)Best regards,Daniel]]></description>
  8988.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Daniel Krüger Cosmo Consult)]]></author>
  8989.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/820#msg-824</guid>
  8990.                <pubDate>Wed, 18 Aug 2021 18:15:44 +0200</pubDate>
  8991.                            </item>
  8992.                    <item>
  8993.                
  8994.                <title><![CDATA[Picker: Same configuration options for Internal View, Dictionary and Template data sources]]></title>
  8995.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/820#msg-822</link>
  8996.                <description><![CDATA[Hi Daniel, +1Also, it would be really nice, if this option could work for sql datasources as well, based on given WFD_ID :)]]></description>
  8997.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Sebastian Gębuś)]]></author>
  8998.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/820#msg-822</guid>
  8999.                <pubDate>Tue, 17 Aug 2021 23:38:19 +0200</pubDate>
  9000.                            </item>
  9001.                    <item>
  9002.                
  9003.                <title><![CDATA[Picker: Same configuration options for Internal View, Dictionary and Template data sources]]></title>
  9004.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/820#msg-820</link>
  9005.                <description><![CDATA[Hi,I really like the new default picker option &quot;Show link to selected workflow instance&quot;. Unfortunately it&#039;s only available for the data source &quot;BPS Internal view&quot;. If I select a dictionary and probably a template process, it&#039;s not available.Therefore I have to create an Internal view in addition to the automatically created dictionary data source.For those who don&#039;t know what this option does: The picker value is rendered as a link which can be displayed in the preview window. That&#039;s a really great feature. :)Best regards,Daniel]]></description>
  9006.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Daniel Krüger Cosmo Consult)]]></author>
  9007.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/820#msg-820</guid>
  9008.                <pubDate>Tue, 17 Aug 2021 19:43:58 +0200</pubDate>
  9009.                            </item>
  9010.                    <item>
  9011.                
  9012.                <title><![CDATA[[SOLVED] WEBCON: Update attachment action -&gt; Q: How to rename attachments WITH continous numbering ?]]></title>
  9013.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/699#msg-818</link>
  9014.                <description><![CDATA[Hi Bjoern,interesting idea but I would advise against this approach. 1. If you are lucky you are only in a &quot;grey&quot; area of violating the EULA:--  3.6. The Licensee may not make any Modifications itself. --  1.20 Modification  shall mean any change of the Software which results in a change of the source code or interferes with the structures of the Environment Database by changing the definitions of the tables, functions, procedures and database objects provided by the Licensor or inserting or updating any records in the Environment Database in a manner other than making use of the standard functionality of the Software or the Software Development Tools (in particular by triggering the insert or update T-SQL commands).As far as I understand this, you could argue that you are only using standard functionality. If this would be a Microsoft product I&#039;m sure you would your environment would not be supported any longer.2. Have you checked the history? Are the changes tracked? Since there are no triggers on the table I don&#039;t think so.If the above idea using the business rule doesn&#039;t work. The alternative would be to create a custom SDK action.I haven&#039;t tested the below code in total, but it should work since I put this together from separate actions.           for(int i = 0; i &lt; templateWorkflow.Attachments.Count; i++)            {                AttachmentData attachment = templateWorkflow.Attachments[i];                attachment.FileName = i.ToString()+&quot;_&quot;+attachment.FileName;                WebCon.WorkFlow.SDK.Documents.DocumentAttachmentsManager.UpdateAttachment(                         new UpdateAttachmentParams()                         {                             Attachment = attachment,                             SkipPermissionsCheck = true                         });            }Best regards,Daniel]]></description>
  9015.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Daniel Krüger Cosmo Consult)]]></author>
  9016.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/699#msg-818</guid>
  9017.                <pubDate>Tue, 17 Aug 2021 18:02:46 +0200</pubDate>
  9018.                            </item>
  9019.                    <item>
  9020.                
  9021.                <title><![CDATA[[SOLVED] WEBCON: Update attachment action -&gt; Q: How to rename attachments WITH continous numbering ?]]></title>
  9022.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/699#msg-817</link>
  9023.                <description><![CDATA[And here the solution for continuous numbering......Hope someone can use it. Thanks for all help.Bye Bjoern]]></description>
  9024.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Bjoern Poller)]]></author>
  9025.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/699#msg-817</guid>
  9026.                <pubDate>Tue, 17 Aug 2021 17:00:37 +0200</pubDate>
  9027.                            </item>
  9028.                    <item>
  9029.                
  9030.                <title><![CDATA[[SOLVED] WEBCON: Update attachment action -&gt; Q: How to rename attachments WITH continous numbering ?]]></title>
  9031.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/699#msg-816</link>
  9032.                <description><![CDATA[Good morning everyone,I would like to share my solutions for this problem. Hopefully WebCon will implement a standard solution in future WebCon versions:The solutuion shown in the picture is an &quot;Action - Integration - Run a SQL procedure&quot; for adding the ATT_ID....]]></description>
  9033.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Bjoern Poller)]]></author>
  9034.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/699#msg-816</guid>
  9035.                <pubDate>Tue, 17 Aug 2021 16:57:31 +0200</pubDate>
  9036.                            </item>
  9037.                    <item>
  9038.                
  9039.                <title><![CDATA[LARGER FONTS FOR STUDIO]]></title>
  9040.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/806#msg-812</link>
  9041.                <description><![CDATA[And when you change the resolution the fonts are larger but blurry, not sharp :-(]]></description>
  9042.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Rafał Kowalewski)]]></author>
  9043.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/806#msg-812</guid>
  9044.                <pubDate>Fri, 13 Aug 2021 19:14:56 +0200</pubDate>
  9045.                            </item>
  9046.                    <item>
  9047.                
  9048.                <title><![CDATA[Workflow preview generation]]></title>
  9049.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/810#msg-810</link>
  9050.                <description><![CDATA[The preview generation functionality should be somehow improved. Currently it is bound to how big the designer studio window is and implicitly how big the resolution of your monitor is. We have some very big workflows that won&#039;t fit on any screen and the preview would always be blurry and unusable.]]></description>
  9051.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Razvan Ogrezeanu - ENCORSA Romania)]]></author>
  9052.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/810#msg-810</guid>
  9053.                <pubDate>Thu, 12 Aug 2021 20:17:11 +0200</pubDate>
  9054.                            </item>
  9055.                    <item>
  9056.                
  9057.                <title><![CDATA[LARGER FONTS FOR STUDIO]]></title>
  9058.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/806#msg-809</link>
  9059.                <description><![CDATA[I can confirm that 2k or 4k monitors are almost unusable when working with designer studio. Only solution is to change resolution.]]></description>
  9060.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Razvan Ogrezeanu - ENCORSA Romania)]]></author>
  9061.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/806#msg-809</guid>
  9062.                <pubDate>Thu, 12 Aug 2021 20:03:19 +0200</pubDate>
  9063.                            </item>
  9064.                    <item>
  9065.                
  9066.                <title><![CDATA[API, or any other kind of automatic deployment from one environment to another.]]></title>
  9067.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/788#msg-808</link>
  9068.                <description><![CDATA[That would be a great functionality as long as only some users would have access to that and also notification of deployment should be sent to a list of user or something like that.]]></description>
  9069.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Razvan Ogrezeanu - ENCORSA Romania)]]></author>
  9070.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/788#msg-808</guid>
  9071.                <pubDate>Thu, 12 Aug 2021 19:59:17 +0200</pubDate>
  9072.                            </item>
  9073.                    <item>
  9074.                
  9075.                <title><![CDATA[LARGER FONTS FOR STUDIO]]></title>
  9076.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/806#msg-806</link>
  9077.                <description><![CDATA[Please add an option to configure font size in studio. Especially with high resolution monitors studio is almost unusable due to very small fonts. This is totally not user friendly especially for people with even slight vision disabilities (wearing glasses).]]></description>
  9078.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Rafał Kowalewski)]]></author>
  9079.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/806#msg-806</guid>
  9080.                <pubDate>Thu, 12 Aug 2021 19:32:50 +0200</pubDate>
  9081.                            </item>
  9082.                    <item>
  9083.                
  9084.                <title><![CDATA[API, or any other kind of automatic deployment from one environment to another.]]></title>
  9085.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/788#msg-805</link>
  9086.                <description><![CDATA[Maybe add configuration option to connect DEV/TEST/PRO environments and then add a one click &quot;copy proces to ...&quot; button. That would be much better then export import with files.]]></description>
  9087.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Rafał Kowalewski)]]></author>
  9088.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/788#msg-805</guid>
  9089.                <pubDate>Thu, 12 Aug 2021 19:29:08 +0200</pubDate>
  9090.                            </item>
  9091.                    <item>
  9092.                
  9093.                <title><![CDATA[API, or any other kind of automatic deployment from one environment to another.]]></title>
  9094.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/788#msg-788</link>
  9095.                <description><![CDATA[In WEBCON the development is so fast and agile that it started to create bottlenecks in the deployment activity. We are using Azure DevOps and it would be great if some kind of pipeline could be created in order to start and deploy things in an automated manner.]]></description>
  9096.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Razvan Ogrezeanu - ENCORSA Romania)]]></author>
  9097.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/788#msg-788</guid>
  9098.                <pubDate>Tue, 10 Aug 2021 21:21:35 +0200</pubDate>
  9099.                            </item>
  9100.                    <item>
  9101.                
  9102.                <title><![CDATA[Data Row filed available in reports]]></title>
  9103.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/785#msg-785</link>
  9104.                <description><![CDATA[I know this might be a controversial one when it comes to performance, but sometimes it could be quite useful to be able to bring that value in reports. Some of that sometimes could also be done with calculated columns in reports, but it could be easier I suppose.]]></description>
  9105.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Razvan Ogrezeanu - ENCORSA Romania)]]></author>
  9106.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/785#msg-785</guid>
  9107.                <pubDate>Tue, 10 Aug 2021 20:28:42 +0200</pubDate>
  9108.                            </item>
  9109.                    <item>
  9110.                
  9111.                <title><![CDATA[Updating &#039;Winnovative HTML to PDF Converter&#039; version]]></title>
  9112.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/774#msg-774</link>
  9113.                <description><![CDATA[Hi,I&#039;ve run into an &#039;issue&#039; using the &#039;Generate a Pdf file&#039; action. https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/770 I used &#039;new&#039; HTML / CSS features which haven&#039;t been supported or even been available by the provided version of the &#039;Winnovative HTML to PDF Converter&#039; engine.WEBCON BPS utilizes version 7, while the current version is 15.As far as I could find out version 7 dates back to 18 Feb 2012.https://winnovative-html-to-pdf-converter-applic.software.informer.com/versions/Version 15 has been released on 28 Oct 2019https://www.nuget.org/packages/wnvhtmlconvert/15.0.0There have been quite a lot of improvements and updating the version could save others a lot of time.Minor additional wish :)Adding a configuration option to automatically create bookmarks, the attachment shows the result:https://www.winnovative-software.com/Help/html_to_pdf/Index.aspx // Auto Create a hierarchy of bookmarks from H1 to H6 tags found in HTML    if (autoBookmarksCheckBox.Checked)    {        // Enable the creation of a hierarchy of bookmarks from H1 to H6 tags        htmlToPdfConverter.PdfBookmarkOptions.AutoBookmarksEnabled = true;        // Display the bookmarks panel in PDF viewer when the generated PDF is opened        htmlToPdfConverter.PdfViewerPreferences.PageMode = ViewerPageMode.UseOutlines;    }Best regards,Daniel]]></description>
  9114.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Daniel Krüger Cosmo Consult)]]></author>
  9115.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/774#msg-774</guid>
  9116.                <pubDate>Thu, 05 Aug 2021 19:55:48 +0200</pubDate>
  9117.                            </item>
  9118.                    <item>
  9119.                
  9120.                <title><![CDATA[Suggestion: Limit length of text fields]]></title>
  9121.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/752#msg-758</link>
  9122.                <description><![CDATA[Since it&#039;s similar, let me add a min/max/step options for input fields of type number :)https://www.w3schools.com/htmL/html_form_attributes.aspOff topic:Thanks for adding the placeholder option in 2021.1.3. :)]]></description>
  9123.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Daniel Krüger Cosmo Consult)]]></author>
  9124.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/752#msg-758</guid>
  9125.                <pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2021 21:36:36 +0200</pubDate>
  9126.                            </item>
  9127.                    <item>
  9128.                
  9129.                <title><![CDATA[Suggestion: Limit length of text fields]]></title>
  9130.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/752#msg-752</link>
  9131.                <description><![CDATA[Often there are scenarios, where the length of a text input field should be limited. This can basically done by means of a regular expression. However, this would still allow the user, to enter more than the allowed characters. It would be great, to have a property in the configuration section to limit the maximum length.]]></description>
  9132.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Markus Jenni)]]></author>
  9133.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/752#msg-752</guid>
  9134.                <pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2021 23:46:55 +0200</pubDate>
  9135.                            </item>
  9136.                    <item>
  9137.                
  9138.                <title><![CDATA[Absence charts should have the same options to save personal views as normal reports]]></title>
  9139.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/736#msg-736</link>
  9140.                <description><![CDATA[The absence chart lacks to possibility to save personal views as it is possible for normal reports. Only Administrators can add and modify views via the configuration menu.For absence charts the same options from modifying views should be possible as for other reports.]]></description>
  9141.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Markus Jenni)]]></author>
  9142.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/736#msg-736</guid>
  9143.                <pubDate>Fri, 23 Jul 2021 19:11:00 +0200</pubDate>
  9144.                            </item>
  9145.                    <item>
  9146.                
  9147.                <title><![CDATA[DASHBOARD: Start-Buttons with &#039;no visibility&#039; in separate rows -&gt; Dummy Start-Button pictures are shown]]></title>
  9148.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/700#msg-717</link>
  9149.                <description><![CDATA[The problem is also in the PC view of the dashboard. As you can see in the new screenshot,we use 3 rows of start buttons.1. Row   BPS user group -&gt; field staff2. Row   BPS user group -&gt; office staff3. Row   BPS user group -&gt; webcon adminsThe picture shows the dashboard for office staff with the only viewable start buttons in 2nd row.]]></description>
  9150.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Bjoern Poller)]]></author>
  9151.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/700#msg-717</guid>
  9152.                <pubDate>Wed, 21 Jul 2021 01:44:06 +0200</pubDate>
  9153.                            </item>
  9154.                    <item>
  9155.                
  9156.                <title><![CDATA[Suggestion for an improved ACTION: Update attachment -&gt; ATT_ID as parameter for new filename]]></title>
  9157.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/716#msg-716</link>
  9158.                <description><![CDATA[Hello WEBCON,i was struggeling with the &quot;Update attachment&quot; action.Our users have the abillity to to upload as many pictures they need to the attachment section in one of our procceses.We would like to rename all files to the same mayor file name with an attached ATT_ID or counting number.It would be great if in future versions there would be a third parameter under Attachment details, where the ATT_IDis selectable (SEE PICTURE). A counting number as fourth parameter would be even better ;-)Bye,Bjoern PollerP.S.: Daniel gave some alternative ways under: https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/699/15P.P.S. (2021-08-17): I found temporaly solutuions for editing ATT_ID and continuous numbering with an action (Run SQL procedure) for those who can&#039;t wait -&gt; https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/699/15]]></description>
  9159.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Bjoern Poller)]]></author>
  9160.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/716#msg-716</guid>
  9161.                <pubDate>Wed, 21 Jul 2021 01:35:49 +0200</pubDate>
  9162.                            </item>
  9163.                    <item>
  9164.                
  9165.                <title><![CDATA[[SOLVED] WEBCON: Update attachment action -&gt; Q: How to rename attachments WITH continous numbering ?]]></title>
  9166.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/699#msg-715</link>
  9167.                <description><![CDATA[Hi Daniel,thanks for your tricks to manage this problem. I will try them and post the results if something works.Nevertheless i suggest a new function in the user voice for future WebCon versions.Bye,Bjoern]]></description>
  9168.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Bjoern Poller)]]></author>
  9169.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/699#msg-715</guid>
  9170.                <pubDate>Wed, 21 Jul 2021 01:23:22 +0200</pubDate>
  9171.                            </item>
  9172.                    <item>
  9173.                
  9174.                <title><![CDATA[[SOLVED] WEBCON: Update attachment action -&gt; Q: How to rename attachments WITH continous numbering ?]]></title>
  9175.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/699#msg-701</link>
  9176.                <description><![CDATA[Hi Bjoern,I haven&#039;t tested this, but my best idea is to use a business rule for the attachment name.The business rule would have two parameters, workflow id and attachment name. With this you should be able to identify the current attachment and return the new name with ATT_ID.If this doesn&#039;t work for some reason, you could add a flow control step afterwards. A check is added, to verify that all attachments have an id in the name. Otherwise increase a counter (technical field), retrieve the first attachment without an Id, update it&#039;s name with the counter and test again. :)An alternative would be to use an item list, whit linked attachments. Than the users could provide some more information and if the users only need an id to which they can refer, than the item list row id could be fine.There&#039;s one draw back with the first option: If the user adds two attachments with the same name from different folders, this will probably fail. On the other hand, it may work, if the updates are processed sequential, than the first attachment is already renamed when the other ones name is determined.Off topic:Is there any chance to move this thread from &#039;user voice&#039; to &#039;forum&#039;.Best regards,Daniel]]></description>
  9177.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Daniel Krüger Cosmo Consult)]]></author>
  9178.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/699#msg-701</guid>
  9179.                <pubDate>Mon, 19 Jul 2021 21:44:53 +0200</pubDate>
  9180.                            </item>
  9181.                    <item>
  9182.                
  9183.                <title><![CDATA[DASHBOARD: Start-Buttons with &#039;no visibility&#039; in separate rows -&gt; Dummy Start-Button pictures are shown]]></title>
  9184.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/700#msg-700</link>
  9185.                <description><![CDATA[Good morning,we are using WebCon 2020 on mobile devices more frequently.Those mobil devices are not allowed to see all start buttons (upper left in the picture / on the upper right the buttons are set to be visible).If i use one dashboard row where only some buttons have visibilty rights, everything is ok. Just the allowed buttons are shown.If the not allowed start-buttons are in a seperate row (buttom screen in picture), there are viewable dummy pictures instead of empty space (upper left in the picture).At the moment we are using seperate dashboards, which are not always necessary, because we are using the sameinformations on both dashboards.So, if there would be the possibility to get rid of those dummy pictures, it would be great.Thanks in advance,Bjoern Poller]]></description>
  9186.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Bjoern Poller)]]></author>
  9187.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/700#msg-700</guid>
  9188.                <pubDate>Mon, 19 Jul 2021 20:49:29 +0200</pubDate>
  9189.                            </item>
  9190.                    <item>
  9191.                
  9192.                <title><![CDATA[[SOLVED] WEBCON: Update attachment action -&gt; Q: How to rename attachments WITH continous numbering ?]]></title>
  9193.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/699#msg-699</link>
  9194.                <description><![CDATA[Good morning everyone,i am wondering, if someone of you already managed to rename the attachments with a kind of numbering within webcon.Continous number or just the ATT_ID would be fine.I am using one process for picture documentation and beside 6 picturefields there is the possibility to attach as many pictures as the user wants to the attachment section. After renaming them with the &quot;update attachment action&quot; while going to the next step, now all have the same name. It would be great if there is a way to give them unique filenames.Thanks for your help,Bjoern]]></description>
  9195.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Bjoern Poller)]]></author>
  9196.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/699#msg-699</guid>
  9197.                <pubDate>Mon, 19 Jul 2021 19:44:07 +0200</pubDate>
  9198.                            </item>
  9199.                    <item>
  9200.                
  9201.                <title><![CDATA[OAuth2 User Authentication: Allow custom query parameters]]></title>
  9202.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/692#msg-692</link>
  9203.                <description><![CDATA[Hi,I really like the new option that an user can authenticate himself against an arbitrary authentication provider. Like in most cases this is true for this feature, if you provide a new one there will be immediately questions asking for more. :)For those who don&#039;t know what I&#039;m talking about you an search the change log for 2021 R3 for &#039;Authentication request endpoints&#039;. In my case it&#039;s the following:When I click on the sign in button (1) the server will read the configured endpoint (2) and redirect the popup to the page (3). Unfortunately, the provided query parameters are stripped from the URL and only the path and hash remains.My request is to change the logic that the query parameters are kept. Sample PowerShells script:$uri = new-object System.UriBuilder(&#039;https://login.microsoftonline.com/common/oauth2/v2.0/authorize?ui_locales=&quot;de-DE&quot;#ui_locales=&quot;de-DE&quot;&#039;)$query = [System.Web.HttpUtility]::ParseQueryString($uri.Query);$query[&quot;redirect_uri&quot;] = &quot;abc&quot;;$query[&quot;prompt&quot;] = &quot;none&quot;;$uri.Query = $query.ToString()$uriReturns: https://login.microsoftonline.com/common/oauth2/v2.0/authorize?ui_locales=&quot;de-DE&quot;&amp;redirect_uri=abc&amp;prompt=none#ui_locales=&quot;de-DE&quot;Reasons:1. There&#039;s a list of &#039;official parameters&#039; which but they  are not necessarily implemented by every authentication provider: - &#039;Official&#039;: https://openid.net/specs/openid-connect-core-1_0.html#AuthRequest- Google: https://developers.google.com/identity/protocols/oauth2/web-server#creatingclient- Microsoft: https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/active-directory/develop/v2-oauth2-auth-code-flow2. Those who are using custom endpoints will know what they are doing.Of course it would be great, if we could use the expression editor for defining the endpoint but this would be a completely other level of change.Best regards,Daniel]]></description>
  9204.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Daniel Krüger Cosmo Consult)]]></author>
  9205.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/692#msg-692</guid>
  9206.                <pubDate>Fri, 16 Jul 2021 00:08:22 +0200</pubDate>
  9207.                            </item>
  9208.                    <item>
  9209.                
  9210.                <title><![CDATA[SDK Teams plugin]]></title>
  9211.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/677#msg-679</link>
  9212.                <description><![CDATA[Hi Iulian,if you don&#039;t want to do it manually every time, you could use a PowerShell script.https://daniels-notes.de/posts/2021/custom-action-xml-to-item-list#vs-solution-informationHere&#039;s an example:https://github.com/cosmoconsult/webconbps/blob/main/SDK_Actions/CC_XmlToItemList/CreatePackage.ps1And the post build event:powershell $(SolutionDir)\CreatePackage.ps1 -targetDir &#039;$(TargetDir)&#039; -projectDir &#039;$(ProjectDir)&#039; -projectName &#039;$(ProjectName)&#039; -copyDestinationFolder &#039;\\gldtc-ap-bpsa02\c$\Install\Extensions&#039;You can omit the &quot;copyDestinationFolder&quot; parameter.For a little bit more information you can refer to:https://daniels-notes.de/posts/2021/custom-action-xml-to-item-list#vs-solution-informationRemark:The repository above uses an older version of &quot;IndentTextLogger&quot;.https://github.com/Daniel-Krueger/webcon_reportSubscriptions/blob/main/ReportSubscriptions/ReportSubscriptions/Logic/IndentTextLogger.csThis one creates event log error entries in case of errors in case of exceptions using the explanation from here:https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/406?messageid=406Best regards,Daniel]]></description>
  9213.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Daniel Krüger Cosmo Consult)]]></author>
  9214.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/677#msg-679</guid>
  9215.                <pubDate>Wed, 14 Jul 2021 00:47:36 +0200</pubDate>
  9216.                            </item>
  9217.                    <item>
  9218.                
  9219.                <title><![CDATA[SDK Teams plugin]]></title>
  9220.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/677#msg-678</link>
  9221.                <description><![CDATA[Hello,This package is using Microsoft.Graph.Core and few more dlls, so you have to put this dlls in package. Example of correct package is published on github as release https://github.com/WEBCON-BPS/BPSExt-Teams/releases/tag/2021.1]]></description>
  9222.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Michał Bednarczyk)]]></author>
  9223.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/677#msg-678</guid>
  9224.                <pubDate>Wed, 14 Jul 2021 00:29:45 +0200</pubDate>
  9225.                            </item>
  9226.                    <item>
  9227.                
  9228.                <title><![CDATA[SDK Teams plugin]]></title>
  9229.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/677#msg-677</link>
  9230.                <description><![CDATA[Hey there,I just found the GitHub from Webcon and i tried to install the teams plugin but unfortunately is continuously crashing when i try to upload it in Webcon . The error is the one showed below . I have to mention that i tried to change the version of the NuGet package but the error is the same.Type: System.IO.FileNotFoundException-------------------------------------------------------Message: Could not load file or assembly &#039;Microsoft.Graph.Core, Version=1.21.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=31bf3856ad364e35&#039; or one of its dependencies. The system cannot find the file specified.-------------------------------------------------------CallStack-------------------------------------------------------   at System.Reflection.RuntimeAssembly._nLoad(AssemblyName fileName, String codeBase, Evidence assemblySecurity, RuntimeAssembly locationHint, StackCrawlMark&amp; stackMark, IntPtr pPrivHostBinder, Boolean throwOnFileNotFound, Boolean forIntrospection, Boolean suppressSecurityChecks)   at System.Reflection.RuntimeAssembly.InternalLoadAssemblyName(AssemblyName assemblyRef, Evidence assemblySecurity, RuntimeAssembly reqAssembly, StackCrawlMark&amp; stackMark, IntPtr pPrivHostBinder, Boolean throwOnFileNotFound, Boolean forIntrospection, Boolean suppressSecurityChecks)   at System.Reflection.RuntimeAssembly.InternalLoad(String assemblyString, Evidence assemblySecurity, StackCrawlMark&amp; stackMark, IntPtr pPrivHostBinder, Boolean forIntrospection)   at System.Reflection.RuntimeAssembly.InternalLoad(String assemblyString, Evidence assemblySecurity, StackCrawlMark&amp; stackMark, Boolean forIntrospection)   at System.Reflection.Assembly.ReflectionOnlyLoad(String assemblyString)   at WebCon.WorkFlow.Studio.Forms.ModuleSDK.AssemblyNameLoader.MyReflectionOnlyResolveEventHandler(Object sender, ResolveEventArgs args)   at System.AppDomain.OnReflectionOnlyAssemblyResolveEvent(RuntimeAssembly assembly, String assemblyFullName)-------------------------------------------------------]]></description>
  9231.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Iulian Amaricai)]]></author>
  9232.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/677#msg-677</guid>
  9233.                <pubDate>Tue, 13 Jul 2021 18:01:24 +0200</pubDate>
  9234.                            </item>
  9235.                    <item>
  9236.                
  9237.                <title><![CDATA[Attachment progress indicator]]></title>
  9238.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/675#msg-675</link>
  9239.                <description><![CDATA[Several of our workflows have multiple attachments that are usually quite large, some can range up to 100MB for a single file. I would be nice to have a progress indicator of attachment uploads so our users could be sure that the file actually finishes uploading and doesn&#039;t leave the site prematurely.]]></description>
  9240.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Bo Jamison)]]></author>
  9241.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/675#msg-675</guid>
  9242.                <pubDate>Sat, 10 Jul 2021 00:43:17 +0200</pubDate>
  9243.                            </item>
  9244.                    <item>
  9245.                
  9246.                <title><![CDATA[Designer Desk CAL]]></title>
  9247.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/674#msg-674</link>
  9248.                <description><![CDATA[There is a problem with using Designer Desk in version 2021.1.3.178. The error indicates no license (license exceeded), but the list of available and used licenses alone indicates that they have not been exceeded.Three users are entered as authorized persons for Designer Desk on the Designer studio side in Configuration. No editing in this field is possible at the moment]]></description>
  9249.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Lidia Bełz)]]></author>
  9250.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/674#msg-674</guid>
  9251.                <pubDate>Sat, 10 Jul 2021 00:09:16 +0200</pubDate>
  9252.                            </item>
  9253.                    <item>
  9254.                
  9255.                <title><![CDATA[Capture ID of SharePoint document library when adding a new document]]></title>
  9256.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/660#msg-660</link>
  9257.                <description><![CDATA[When adding a new list item into a SharePoint list, you have the option in BPS to capture the ID of the new list item you have added. Then it is easy to add attachments to this list item using that ID.When I add a new document to a document library, the listID capture option is disabled. It would be really helpful to be able to capture this list ID for a document library as well so that then I can use that to add custom meta-data to the document library for the document I have just copied to SP.]]></description>
  9258.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (andy@consultdolphin.com)]]></author>
  9259.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/660#msg-660</guid>
  9260.                <pubDate>Tue, 06 Jul 2021 19:32:14 +0200</pubDate>
  9261.                            </item>
  9262.                    <item>
  9263.                
  9264.                <title><![CDATA[Improvement to Validate form: Allow execution via form rule]]></title>
  9265.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/656#msg-656</link>
  9266.                <description><![CDATA[Hi everyone,I&#039;m currently creating quite a lot of &quot;validate form&quot; actions. For example:- Date one must be after date two- Date must be in the future- Integer value must be positiveThese are implemented as &quot;validate form&quot; action since I prefer validation on the server rather than on the client only. The draw back is, that it&#039;s a poor usability. So I &quot;recreate&quot; the same validations as form rules with alerts, which are called when the field value is changed.So I have to implement the same validation twice and the ALERT function isn&#039;t build for providing multi lingual messages.Besides the duplicate work it&#039;s only a matter of time until the validation checks or messages differ.I&#039;m not sure whether I&#039;m the only one doing this, but if it would be possible to call a validate form action from a form rule and display the error message in the current language it would save a lot of time and errors :)Best regards,Daniel]]></description>
  9267.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Daniel Krüger Cosmo Consult)]]></author>
  9268.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/656#msg-656</guid>
  9269.                <pubDate>Fri, 02 Jul 2021 23:16:17 +0200</pubDate>
  9270.                            </item>
  9271.                    <item>
  9272.                
  9273.                <title><![CDATA[DASHBOARD: Auto Refresher -&gt; please add more short intervals]]></title>
  9274.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/619#msg-619</link>
  9275.                <description><![CDATA[Hello there,we are using a tablet pc at the reception counter for our digital &#039;guest check-in&#039; process.It&#039;s just a seperate Dashboard with a report displaying the current check-in step.We are using the &quot;Auto Refresher&quot; for getting the latest check-in data.Our problem now is, that the smallest interval (1min) is still to long, the maximumvalue good enough would be 30 sec, otherwise the guest has to click the update buttonin most of the times cause of the long waiting-time.It would be great, if you could add 30 sec. to the available values next time or even better:just an empty field for personal configuration.Thanks,Bjoern Poller]]></description>
  9276.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Bjoern Poller)]]></author>
  9277.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/619#msg-619</guid>
  9278.                <pubDate>Wed, 16 Jun 2021 23:51:50 +0200</pubDate>
  9279.                            </item>
  9280.                    <item>
  9281.                
  9282.                <title><![CDATA[Hiding Rows in Items Lists]]></title>
  9283.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/552#msg-614</link>
  9284.                <description><![CDATA[Hi Daniel,Thank you! I will try it out and come back.Kind regards, Klaus]]></description>
  9285.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Klaus Seidler)]]></author>
  9286.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/552#msg-614</guid>
  9287.                <pubDate>Sat, 12 Jun 2021 01:04:28 +0200</pubDate>
  9288.                            </item>
  9289.                    <item>
  9290.                
  9291.                <title><![CDATA[Hiding Rows in Items Lists]]></title>
  9292.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/552#msg-601</link>
  9293.                <description><![CDATA[Hi Klaus,you could use the following as an alternative:1) Create a form rule with edit mode JavaScript mode 2) Add a parameterUse this code and replace the PARAMETER with yours.setTimeout(function(){debugger;var itemListId = PARAMETER.idvar row = $(&quot;tr[data-index=&#039;&quot;+uxContext.currentRowNumber+&quot;&#039;]&quot;,$(&quot;#SubElems_&quot;+itemListId ))[0]row.style = &quot;display:none;&quot;;},250);3) Create another rule where iterate about the rows and call the other form rule, if the condition applies.4) This will hide all rows, which match the conditions.Remarks:- The timeout is necessary, because at the time of executions the item list rows are not visible.- This won&#039;t work if the item list is in collapsed group/other tab- I changed the naming of the field from visible to hidden so the screenshot don&#039;t match upI wouldn&#039;t use this option, but disable those cells/style the rows, so that the users see them, but know that there is nothing left to do. This can be achieved with the default functions options. Best regards,Daniel]]></description>
  9294.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Daniel Krüger Cosmo Consult)]]></author>
  9295.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/552#msg-601</guid>
  9296.                <pubDate>Thu, 10 Jun 2021 17:13:49 +0200</pubDate>
  9297.                            </item>
  9298.                    <item>
  9299.                
  9300.                <title><![CDATA[Hiding Rows in Items Lists]]></title>
  9301.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/552#msg-596</link>
  9302.                <description><![CDATA[Hi Bjoern,in general I would define &quot;multiple users&quot; as any kind of &quot;multiple users&quot;. In the actual use case I thought of putting &quot;all domain users&quot; (or any other AD group) as standard. So everybody could see that line. After doing &quot;something&quot; to that row I thought of set &quot;any defined user&quot; in order to hide the column from everybody else.   Kind regards,Klaus]]></description>
  9303.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Klaus Seidler)]]></author>
  9304.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/552#msg-596</guid>
  9305.                <pubDate>Thu, 10 Jun 2021 02:11:52 +0200</pubDate>
  9306.                            </item>
  9307.                    <item>
  9308.                
  9309.                <title><![CDATA[Hiding Rows in Items Lists]]></title>
  9310.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/552#msg-571</link>
  9311.                <description><![CDATA[Hello Klaus,how do you define your &quot;multiple users&quot;.All task owners? Values of a picker field in the ITEM LIST?Combination of ITEM LIST value and Form Field value?Kind regardsBjoern]]></description>
  9312.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Bjoern Poller)]]></author>
  9313.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/552#msg-571</guid>
  9314.                <pubDate>Thu, 03 Jun 2021 00:24:36 +0200</pubDate>
  9315.                            </item>
  9316.                    <item>
  9317.                
  9318.                <title><![CDATA[Allow management of WEBCON BPS Groups to other users than WEBCON Admins]]></title>
  9319.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/457#msg-569</link>
  9320.                <description><![CDATA[Was thinking if it were a good idea to have the possibility to assign groups to an application. Very similar to the &quot;Connections&quot; and &quot;Data Sources&quot; tab. Those groups should be manageable by the application administrators.]]></description>
  9321.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Markus Jenni)]]></author>
  9322.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/457#msg-569</guid>
  9323.                <pubDate>Wed, 02 Jun 2021 18:07:49 +0200</pubDate>
  9324.                            </item>
  9325.                    <item>
  9326.                
  9327.                <title><![CDATA[Hiding Rows in Items Lists]]></title>
  9328.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/552#msg-552</link>
  9329.                <description><![CDATA[Hi.I&#039;m looking for a solution to hide rows of a list element depending on the value of a list element column.I.e. for a task list I would like to have the row visible for everyone, until the checkbox &quot;done&quot; ist set &quot;true&quot;.I tried with the &quot;Acceptance&quot; function (see Acceptance.png), but the issue is that I can make the column visible for a (single) defined user, but not for multiple users.Any ideas here?The preferred would be a &quot;HIDE ITEM LIST ROW&quot; function in the form rules.Kind regardsKlaus]]></description>
  9330.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Klaus Seidler)]]></author>
  9331.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/552#msg-552</guid>
  9332.                <pubDate>Wed, 26 May 2021 01:40:12 +0200</pubDate>
  9333.                            </item>
  9334.                    <item>
  9335.                
  9336.                <title><![CDATA[Improvement to Validate form: Add Set focus on control option]]></title>
  9337.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/496#msg-542</link>
  9338.                <description><![CDATA[Thanks Christian for mentioning that you did it with form rules. :)I&#039;ve come up with a general solution to achieve the intended effect.https://daniels-notes.de/posts/2021/focus-error-field]]></description>
  9339.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Daniel Krüger Cosmo Consult)]]></author>
  9340.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/496#msg-542</guid>
  9341.                <pubDate>Sun, 23 May 2021 09:03:02 +0200</pubDate>
  9342.                            </item>
  9343.                    <item>
  9344.                
  9345.                <title><![CDATA[Improvement to Show first attachment on page load]]></title>
  9346.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/512#msg-537</link>
  9347.                <description><![CDATA[What about a java-script action like OpenElement or StartElement to open a document in a new dialog?]]></description>
  9348.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Markus Jenni)]]></author>
  9349.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/512#msg-537</guid>
  9350.                <pubDate>Fri, 21 May 2021 18:09:22 +0200</pubDate>
  9351.                            </item>
  9352.                    <item>
  9353.                
  9354.                <title><![CDATA[E-mail notifications in Webcon BPS]]></title>
  9355.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/356#msg-533</link>
  9356.                <description><![CDATA[The option for email notification from the level of user setttings menu seems to me as an obvious option (MUST) in such an application.Simple turn on/off switch should be accessible in the same way as &quot;substitutions&quot;]]></description>
  9357.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Gronek Arkadiusz)]]></author>
  9358.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/356#msg-533</guid>
  9359.                <pubDate>Thu, 20 May 2021 00:22:59 +0200</pubDate>
  9360.                            </item>
  9361.                    <item>
  9362.                
  9363.                <title><![CDATA[No changes to application group headers]]></title>
  9364.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/486#msg-525</link>
  9365.                <description><![CDATA[Thanks for changing this in 2021.1.2.136 :)]]></description>
  9366.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Daniel Krüger Cosmo Consult)]]></author>
  9367.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/486#msg-525</guid>
  9368.                <pubDate>Tue, 18 May 2021 00:22:20 +0200</pubDate>
  9369.                            </item>
  9370.                    <item>
  9371.                
  9372.                <title><![CDATA[Improvement to Show first attachment on page load]]></title>
  9373.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/512#msg-515</link>
  9374.                <description><![CDATA[I have a comment regarding this. Instead of defining which is the first attachment, it would even be better to define the order of the attachments, which is used for paging. Than we could do something like.select ATT_IDfrom WFDataAttachments order by ATT_TsInsert descThe query won&#039;t work, I just added it as an example. :)]]></description>
  9375.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Daniel Krüger Cosmo Consult)]]></author>
  9376.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/512#msg-515</guid>
  9377.                <pubDate>Fri, 14 May 2021 21:36:09 +0200</pubDate>
  9378.                            </item>
  9379.                    <item>
  9380.                
  9381.                <title><![CDATA[Improvement to Show first attachment on page load]]></title>
  9382.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/512#msg-512</link>
  9383.                <description><![CDATA[It would be great to be able to pass any attachment id to the &#039;show first attachment on page load&#039;, e.g. via sql query editor.]]></description>
  9384.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Dawid Jurczyk)]]></author>
  9385.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/512#msg-512</guid>
  9386.                <pubDate>Fri, 14 May 2021 16:30:56 +0200</pubDate>
  9387.                            </item>
  9388.                    <item>
  9389.                
  9390.                <title><![CDATA[Improvement to Validate form: Add Set focus on control option]]></title>
  9391.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/496#msg-497</link>
  9392.                <description><![CDATA[Thank you Daniel!I have built quite a few rules to get that behaviour for the most problematic fields, having it out of the box would improve things a lot! :)]]></description>
  9393.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Christian Amler)]]></author>
  9394.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/496#msg-497</guid>
  9395.                <pubDate>Tue, 11 May 2021 00:41:24 +0200</pubDate>
  9396.                            </item>
  9397.                    <item>
  9398.                
  9399.                <title><![CDATA[Improvement to Validate form: Add Set focus on control option]]></title>
  9400.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/496#msg-496</link>
  9401.                <description><![CDATA[Hi everyone, most of the time an error raised by the &quot;Validate form&quot; action can be fixed by the current user. It would be great if we could have a new configuration option &quot;Focus field&quot; where you can set an expression/field. When the error is displayed on the form the &quot;Set Focus&quot; action is executed and the configured value selected. I assume that the &quot;Set focus&quot; action already toggles collapsed groups/other tabs.Best regards,Daniel]]></description>
  9402.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Daniel Krüger Cosmo Consult)]]></author>
  9403.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/496#msg-496</guid>
  9404.                <pubDate>Mon, 10 May 2021 23:47:26 +0200</pubDate>
  9405.                            </item>
  9406.                    <item>
  9407.                
  9408.                <title><![CDATA[Optimization of questions to the database]]></title>
  9409.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/476#msg-489</link>
  9410.                <description><![CDATA[Hi Dariusz,I&#039;m not sure whether I understand your requested change. Do you want to define the picker search mode per field?If this is not the case, I don&#039;t see any necessary change. Depending on the selected search mode there&#039;s one specialized query against the data source, at least in case of a SQL database and if popup search window is used. If autocomplete is used, there are of course multiple queries.Of topic:It looks like you have a special database maybe you could add additional indexes on the database for the few columns.Best regards,Daniel]]></description>
  9411.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Daniel Krüger Cosmo Consult)]]></author>
  9412.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/476#msg-489</guid>
  9413.                <pubDate>Thu, 06 May 2021 23:56:16 +0200</pubDate>
  9414.                            </item>
  9415.                    <item>
  9416.                
  9417.                <title><![CDATA[No changes to application group headers]]></title>
  9418.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/486#msg-486</link>
  9419.                <description><![CDATA[Hi everyone,I&#039;m not sure with which release the application group headers are transformed to lower case, but could we get rid of it again?I can live with all upper case, but transforming all characters to lower case after the first one is simply not acceptable. - Abbreviations look like word- The corporate design may define how some words are written- It looks like a spelling error. This is even more true in German, all nouns are written with a capital case.This applies to 2021.1.2.101.Best regards,Daniel]]></description>
  9420.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Daniel Krüger Cosmo Consult)]]></author>
  9421.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/486#msg-486</guid>
  9422.                <pubDate>Thu, 06 May 2021 22:48:49 +0200</pubDate>
  9423.                            </item>
  9424.                    <item>
  9425.                
  9426.                <title><![CDATA[Optimization of questions to the database]]></title>
  9427.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/476#msg-476</link>
  9428.                <description><![CDATA[Currently selection attributes, such as picker, poll the database in such a way that LIKEs are always placed in the WHERE clause. The data that the database returns are then filtered according to the picker configuration (exact match, contains phrase, starts with).In my company, we collect customer data from several CRM systems. For one of them, we have the customer&#039;s data materialized in the dictionary database. We query this data about 9 - 30 thousand times a day, on average one execution takes 3 seconds.After changing the polling method from like to exact match (mediated by the SDK add-on), it turned out that the previous elapsed max of 95,000 seconds dropped to 10 seconds. This change reduced the load on the dictionary database, and thus relieved the entire database environment by about 27%. The 27% obtained will be immediately used by the main production base of BPS_Main.According to the query plan, LIKE searches account for 98% of the query cost. The query with an exact match (=) is 2% of the query cost.Due to the very high yield for the environment (large BPS instances), I propose to create a new type of selection attributes, where we give up filtering, and for columns intended for searching, we will add an additional search method parameter to the database: LIKE%, %LIKE%, exact match (=).]]></description>
  9429.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Dariusz Tułacz)]]></author>
  9430.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/476#msg-476</guid>
  9431.                <pubDate>Sat, 01 May 2021 23:23:22 +0200</pubDate>
  9432.                            </item>
  9433.                    <item>
  9434.                
  9435.                <title><![CDATA[Allow management of WEBCON BPS Groups to other users than WEBCON Admins]]></title>
  9436.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/457#msg-457</link>
  9437.                <description><![CDATA[The management of BPS groups is only possible for WEBCON Admins. Some customers wish, that they can do this on their own, but we don&#039;t wont to give the required rights.We solved this by means of a little helper workflow, that enabled us to configure the BPS group to manage, a responsible person and an itemlist with the assigned users. This works quite nice this way.However, it would be great, when this option would be built-in. Could be either in the same place as for the admin or a widget which could be added to a dashboard]]></description>
  9438.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Markus Jenni)]]></author>
  9439.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/457#msg-457</guid>
  9440.                <pubDate>Wed, 21 Apr 2021 04:18:45 +0200</pubDate>
  9441.                            </item>
  9442.                    <item>
  9443.                
  9444.                <title><![CDATA[Concat function handling]]></title>
  9445.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/419#msg-429</link>
  9446.                <description><![CDATA[Hello Herr Dengler ;-),You can only move/replace/add the contents of the individual parts by copy and paste. I also like to use the test function to look at the result - where possible.]]></description>
  9447.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Manuela Fuchs)]]></author>
  9448.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/419#msg-429</guid>
  9449.                <pubDate>Thu, 08 Apr 2021 17:19:41 +0200</pubDate>
  9450.                            </item>
  9451.                    <item>
  9452.                
  9453.                <title><![CDATA[Concat function handling]]></title>
  9454.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/419#msg-428</link>
  9455.                <description><![CDATA[Modifing functions can be a challenge and can end up in creating the whole expression again. It would be really great to be able to insert functions within any place of an expression.]]></description>
  9456.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Markus Jenni)]]></author>
  9457.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/419#msg-428</guid>
  9458.                <pubDate>Wed, 07 Apr 2021 21:54:16 +0200</pubDate>
  9459.                            </item>
  9460.                    <item>
  9461.                
  9462.                <title><![CDATA[Additonal styling capabilities for paths and theme]]></title>
  9463.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/41#msg-421</link>
  9464.                <description><![CDATA[Dear Markus, Daniel, correct me if I&#039;m wrong, but your suggestion here could also lead us to the place where we could put icons in buttons. I can image placing icons in path buttons using font awesome icons (https://fontawesome.com/) or Bootstrap (https://getbootstrap.com/). What do you think?]]></description>
  9465.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Adam Hatak)]]></author>
  9466.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/41#msg-421</guid>
  9467.                <pubDate>Sun, 04 Apr 2021 00:57:46 +0200</pubDate>
  9468.                            </item>
  9469.                    <item>
  9470.                
  9471.                <title><![CDATA[Concat function handling]]></title>
  9472.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/419#msg-420</link>
  9473.                <description><![CDATA[Hi Thomas,I had the same problem in addition there were so many elements that I had to scroll. That was the reason why I fell back to the good old sql statement. I&#039;m not sure how the functions work internally but in the best case they would be evaluated in memory without communication with the SQL Server. Therefore I would have liked to go with the new functions.Depending on the situation it would be an option to delete one parameter and nest another concat function.Best regards,Daniel]]></description>
  9474.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Daniel Krüger Cosmo Consult)]]></author>
  9475.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/419#msg-420</guid>
  9476.                <pubDate>Fri, 02 Apr 2021 08:59:17 +0200</pubDate>
  9477.                            </item>
  9478.                    <item>
  9479.                
  9480.                <title><![CDATA[Concat function handling]]></title>
  9481.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/419#msg-419</link>
  9482.                <description><![CDATA[Dear WebCon Team,the Concat function is a great advantage for text handling. Unfortunately, it is very hard or let&#039;s more say inconvenient, if you forgot a text part. In my understanding it is not possible to replace concat parts or even add text parts before or change there position.e.g.concat[Happy][Weekend!]so I would like to say &quot;Happy easter Weekend!&quot;for this I have to delete Weekend! and type easter and then type again Weekend!Of course in this case I just have to add it to the text directly, but please imagine in case of the text parts there are attributes.I am not sure if there is any trick or something to know, but I did not manage to handle it in an easy way.Would be great if the usage could be more user friendly.Thanks a lotBest regardsThomas]]></description>
  9483.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Thomas Dengler)]]></author>
  9484.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/419#msg-419</guid>
  9485.                <pubDate>Fri, 02 Apr 2021 01:47:15 +0200</pubDate>
  9486.                            </item>
  9487.                    <item>
  9488.                
  9489.                <title><![CDATA[Duplicate: Themes: Add option for custom css file/url (Closed)]]></title>
  9490.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/404#msg-416</link>
  9491.                <description><![CDATA[Thanks for the reminder I only had the path style suggestions in mind.]]></description>
  9492.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Daniel Krüger Cosmo Consult)]]></author>
  9493.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/404#msg-416</guid>
  9494.                <pubDate>Tue, 30 Mar 2021 03:15:17 +0200</pubDate>
  9495.                            </item>
  9496.                    <item>
  9497.                
  9498.                <title><![CDATA[Duplicate: Themes: Add option for custom css file/url (Closed)]]></title>
  9499.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/404#msg-415</link>
  9500.                <description><![CDATA[good to see, that you&#039;ve agreed, that html fields are quite limited for custom styling.This is what i basically asked for a while agohttps://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/41/15The screenshot i created contains a css editor included in the theme editor. Kind of how it is done in former wizdom intranet.]]></description>
  9501.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Markus Jenni)]]></author>
  9502.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/404#msg-415</guid>
  9503.                <pubDate>Mon, 29 Mar 2021 21:51:50 +0200</pubDate>
  9504.                            </item>
  9505.                    <item>
  9506.                
  9507.                <title><![CDATA[Duplicate: Themes: Add option for custom css file/url (Closed)]]></title>
  9508.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/404#msg-411</link>
  9509.                <description><![CDATA[Hi Nik, I think this would be a nice addition to define JS files on global/application level. :)Of course you could load .css files within the JS but than you would need to identify the current theme to load the appropriate file to load.Best regards,Daniel]]></description>
  9510.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Daniel Krüger Cosmo Consult)]]></author>
  9511.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/404#msg-411</guid>
  9512.                <pubDate>Thu, 25 Mar 2021 21:35:45 +0100</pubDate>
  9513.                            </item>
  9514.                    <item>
  9515.                
  9516.                <title><![CDATA[Duplicate: Themes: Add option for custom css file/url (Closed)]]></title>
  9517.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/404#msg-410</link>
  9518.                <description><![CDATA[Hi Daniel!Thanks for the good suggestion.I would go here a little bit further and would like to see an option, which allows us to include some custom Javascript and / or CSS in the whole portal or for Application Level. This should be configurable in the Designer Studio.Best regards, Nik]]></description>
  9519.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Nikolaus Schusser)]]></author>
  9520.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/404#msg-410</guid>
  9521.                <pubDate>Thu, 25 Mar 2021 21:23:23 +0100</pubDate>
  9522.                            </item>
  9523.                    <item>
  9524.                
  9525.                <title><![CDATA[Duplicate: Themes: Add option for custom css file/url (Closed)]]></title>
  9526.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/404#msg-404</link>
  9527.                <description><![CDATA[I&#039;ve overlooked an already existing user voice created by Markus.Hi,could we please get an option to define an additional .css file inside the theme. It could be similar to the implementation for defining the logos which can be loaded from an URL or uploaded as a file.Benefits: - We don&#039;t need to use the HTML field on the form level, like https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/41/15 - HTML fields can&#039;t be displayed on reports so we are creating other workarounds  - It&#039;s not necessary to load these via dashboards - Single point of failure instead while providing a consistent user interface - With this we could fix small issues ourselves for example: https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/380 Best regards,Daniel]]></description>
  9528.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Daniel Krüger Cosmo Consult)]]></author>
  9529.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/404#msg-404</guid>
  9530.                <pubDate>Thu, 25 Mar 2021 01:04:27 +0100</pubDate>
  9531.                            </item>
  9532.                    <item>
  9533.                
  9534.                <title><![CDATA[Verify Process: Check for non existing users]]></title>
  9535.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/401#msg-401</link>
  9536.                <description><![CDATA[The Verify Process action (Process configuration test) currently doesn&#039;t check if hard coded users still exist.For example a group could be selected in a people field which limits the available users. The group has been deleted like in the attached image. But this doesn&#039;t result in an error. Best regards,Daniel]]></description>
  9537.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Daniel Krüger Cosmo Consult)]]></author>
  9538.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/401#msg-401</guid>
  9539.                <pubDate>Wed, 24 Mar 2021 01:16:17 +0100</pubDate>
  9540.                            </item>
  9541.                    <item>
  9542.                
  9543.                <title><![CDATA[Searching structures -&gt; Archive | Column customization]]></title>
  9544.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/384#msg-387</link>
  9545.                <description><![CDATA[Hi,I&#039;m not sure how easily that can be done for process fields but at least created global fields could be displayed by default.Best regards,Daniel]]></description>
  9546.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Daniel Krüger Cosmo Consult)]]></author>
  9547.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/384#msg-387</guid>
  9548.                <pubDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2021 05:31:00 +0100</pubDate>
  9549.                            </item>
  9550.                    <item>
  9551.                
  9552.                <title><![CDATA[Searching structures -&gt; Archive | Column customization]]></title>
  9553.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/384#msg-384</link>
  9554.                <description><![CDATA[Hello, it would be nice if there`s a possibility to customize columns in build-in Archive report (Searching structures), independently for each application for example :)]]></description>
  9555.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Sebastian Gębuś)]]></author>
  9556.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/384#msg-384</guid>
  9557.                <pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2021 21:29:44 +0100</pubDate>
  9558.                            </item>
  9559.                    <item>
  9560.                
  9561.                <title><![CDATA[Dictionary: Changing type to multi line of field(attribute) Description]]></title>
  9562.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/383#msg-383</link>
  9563.                <description><![CDATA[Hi everyone,I&#039;m not sure if I&#039;m the only one, but whenever I create a dictionary, I replace (hide) the default Description single line field with a new multi line field. Therefore I would suggest to either rename the field to &quot;Short description&quot; or change the default field type. I&#039;m not sure where it&#039;s used internally so that it&#039;s disabled to change it&#039;s type. Best regards,Daniel]]></description>
  9564.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Daniel Krüger Cosmo Consult)]]></author>
  9565.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/383#msg-383</guid>
  9566.                <pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2021 00:58:59 +0100</pubDate>
  9567.                            </item>
  9568.                    <item>
  9569.                
  9570.                <title><![CDATA[DASHBOARD: Maybe -&gt; Two-and-a-half columns section layout as new selection]]></title>
  9571.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/381#msg-381</link>
  9572.                <description><![CDATA[Hello there,with working much more with compact start buttons, i am optimizing our older dashboard layouts.We have a few applications, which have many start buttons.So i was wondering, if, maybe, in further coming WEBCON versions there could be the possibility to add 2 more &quot;section layouts&quot; like i posted in the picture. Mostly the usefull one would be: half side left,and two small columns in the right half - just for start buttons. If space would be big enough, that wouldbe a more efficient way to deal with start buttons.Thanks,Bjoern Poller]]></description>
  9573.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Bjoern Poller)]]></author>
  9574.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/381#msg-381</guid>
  9575.                <pubDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2021 23:46:17 +0100</pubDate>
  9576.                            </item>
  9577.                    <item>
  9578.                
  9579.                <title><![CDATA[WEBCON 2021: Dashboard -&gt; Compact Start Button [cuts off e.g. small &#039;g&#039;]]]></title>
  9580.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/380#msg-380</link>
  9581.                <description><![CDATA[Hi there,this week i used &quot;compact Start Buttons&quot; for the first time.With our windows settings [FullHD, Text Scale 100%], e.g. the small &#039;g&#039; is cut off a little bit at the buttom.It&#039;s no big issue, but a few more pixels in the next version should work perfect.Thanks,Bjoern Poller]]></description>
  9582.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Bjoern Poller)]]></author>
  9583.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/380#msg-380</guid>
  9584.                <pubDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2021 23:10:22 +0100</pubDate>
  9585.                            </item>
  9586.                    <item>
  9587.                
  9588.                <title><![CDATA[Designer Studio IDE for SQL / Javascirpt]]></title>
  9589.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/377#msg-379</link>
  9590.                <description><![CDATA[Thanks Daniel.I took a quick look through the existing threads, but didn&#039;t find anything similar off the the first try.My mistake.]]></description>
  9591.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Kluthe-Köhler, Tim)]]></author>
  9592.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/377#msg-379</guid>
  9593.                <pubDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2021 19:30:52 +0100</pubDate>
  9594.                            </item>
  9595.                    <item>
  9596.                
  9597.                <title><![CDATA[Designer Studio IDE for SQL / Javascirpt]]></title>
  9598.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/377#msg-378</link>
  9599.                <description><![CDATA[I&#039;m just linking a similar request:https://community.webcon.com/community.webcon.com/public/forum/thread/74/15]]></description>
  9600.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Daniel Krüger Cosmo Consult)]]></author>
  9601.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/377#msg-378</guid>
  9602.                <pubDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2021 19:19:57 +0100</pubDate>
  9603.                            </item>
  9604.                    <item>
  9605.                
  9606.                <title><![CDATA[Designer Studio IDE for SQL / Javascirpt]]></title>
  9607.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/377#msg-377</link>
  9608.                <description><![CDATA[It would be great, to have some kind of IDE in the Designer Studio while editing SQL or Javascript code.Therefore it would already help if there were line numbers and code highlighting e.g. for opening and closing brackets.Sometime it is difficult to manage your own code when it reaches a certain number of lines. For example, if you have a Javascript code and only one semicolon or closing bracket is missing, you need to look for the issue.Yes, you could copy your code to another tool and edit it there, but then you cannot use WEBCON&#039;s references to certain objects, IDs etc.Such an IDE like integrated tool inside the Designer Studio would be very helpful!]]></description>
  9609.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Kluthe-Köhler, Tim)]]></author>
  9610.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/377#msg-377</guid>
  9611.                <pubDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2021 18:54:01 +0100</pubDate>
  9612.                            </item>
  9613.                    <item>
  9614.                
  9615.                <title><![CDATA[E-mail notifications in Webcon BPS]]></title>
  9616.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/356#msg-359</link>
  9617.                <description><![CDATA[We have started a project covering the needs described- but for mass notifications only.]]></description>
  9618.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Pawel Jawien WEBCON)]]></author>
  9619.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/356#msg-359</guid>
  9620.                <pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2021 15:27:32 +0100</pubDate>
  9621.                            </item>
  9622.                    <item>
  9623.                
  9624.                <title><![CDATA[E-mail notifications in Webcon BPS]]></title>
  9625.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/356#msg-356</link>
  9626.                <description><![CDATA[Currently there&#039;s no option to manage e-mail notifications in Webcon BPS.It would be a nice feature for users to be able to manage from which  process / step they want to receive notifications and from which not. Just like they can personalize portal main page.Now if user are assigned to a lot of applications, it usually create mail rule in it&#039;s mail client which move all notifications to one place, which provides to situation when some really important notifications are missed by users.]]></description>
  9627.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Marek W.)]]></author>
  9628.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/356#msg-356</guid>
  9629.                <pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2021 22:35:47 +0100</pubDate>
  9630.                            </item>
  9631.                    <item>
  9632.                
  9633.                <title><![CDATA[Dashboard + Reports]]></title>
  9634.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/289#msg-330</link>
  9635.                <description><![CDATA[The described behavior is a reported bug and will be implemented in the next 2021.1.2 release.]]></description>
  9636.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Pawel Jawien WEBCON)]]></author>
  9637.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/289#msg-330</guid>
  9638.                <pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2021 15:27:20 +0100</pubDate>
  9639.                            </item>
  9640.                    <item>
  9641.                
  9642.                <title><![CDATA[Form rule: Switch to vertical /horizontal layout on all operators]]></title>
  9643.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/329#msg-329</link>
  9644.                <description><![CDATA[There&#039;s an option to switch from horizontal to vertical layout if you click on AND/OR operators. Could this be extended to all other operators, too. :)This would reduce the scrolling and therefore improve readability a lot.]]></description>
  9645.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Daniel Krüger Cosmo Consult)]]></author>
  9646.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/329#msg-329</guid>
  9647.                <pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2021 01:24:25 +0100</pubDate>
  9648.                            </item>
  9649.                    <item>
  9650.                
  9651.                <title><![CDATA[Improvements to form rule alerts/confirmation]]></title>
  9652.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/328#msg-328</link>
  9653.                <description><![CDATA[It would be nice if there were the following changes to the form rule alerts/confirmation functions:a) Modal dialogThey could reuse the modal dialog from the &quot;single row edit&quot; instead of using the browser integrated alert/confirmation window. This would result in a more consistent user experience. Of course it would be nice to set title, body and button texts but I would be fine with setting the body at least. :)b) Allowing html for the body. Currently adding line breaks is cluttering the form rule because we need to use a constants with &gt;\r\n&lt;  as a value since the \ is escaped in the text. There&#039;s an option to use bold/italic in alerts if you use utf8 characters but I&#039;m not sure whether it is such a good idea to use this. https://yaytext.com/bold-italic/Edit:It would be nice, if this would be available on the notification options of a menu button, see picture.]]></description>
  9654.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Daniel Krüger Cosmo Consult)]]></author>
  9655.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/328#msg-328</guid>
  9656.                <pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2021 01:19:22 +0100</pubDate>
  9657.                            </item>
  9658.                    <item>
  9659.                
  9660.                <title><![CDATA[Add more colours to mark arrows in BPS process design]]></title>
  9661.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/33#msg-312</link>
  9662.                <description><![CDATA[Thank you for your feedback! New path colors are almost there :)]]></description>
  9663.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Lukasz Wrobel)]]></author>
  9664.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/33#msg-312</guid>
  9665.                <pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2021 21:17:57 +0100</pubDate>
  9666.                            </item>
  9667.                    <item>
  9668.                
  9669.                <title><![CDATA[Office Add-Ins instalation]]></title>
  9670.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/304#msg-306</link>
  9671.                <description><![CDATA[I ment it&#039;s only way to install Add-In form Webcon Portal - if user wants to install it but we don&#039;t need everyone to use it. Of course we use auto distribution method if we can.That&#039;s great news!]]></description>
  9672.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Jarosław Dziekan)]]></author>
  9673.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/304#msg-306</guid>
  9674.                <pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2021 21:53:04 +0100</pubDate>
  9675.                            </item>
  9676.                    <item>
  9677.                
  9678.                <title><![CDATA[Office Add-Ins instalation]]></title>
  9679.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/304#msg-305</link>
  9680.                <description><![CDATA[Office Add-Ins installation from WEBCON BPS Portal is not the only installation method. You can install Add-ins using the MSI package by Active Directory Group Policy or any other system management platform. You can find an MSI file in the WEBCON BPS installer catalog: ..MS Office Addins\Autodistribution\Regardless, the new version of WEBCON BPS Add-Ins will be published soon.]]></description>
  9681.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Pawel Jawien WEBCON)]]></author>
  9682.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/304#msg-305</guid>
  9683.                <pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2021 21:34:06 +0100</pubDate>
  9684.                            </item>
  9685.                    <item>
  9686.                
  9687.                <title><![CDATA[Office Add-Ins instalation]]></title>
  9688.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/304#msg-304</link>
  9689.                <description><![CDATA[Curently there is only one option to install Office Add-Ins from Webcon Portal - use Internet Explorer. As we know IE is realy old web browser and Microsoft is going to finish support for this browser at 21th of August 2021.We should add support for this feature for modern web browsers.]]></description>
  9690.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Jarosław Dziekan)]]></author>
  9691.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/304#msg-304</guid>
  9692.                <pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2021 17:45:47 +0100</pubDate>
  9693.                            </item>
  9694.                    <item>
  9695.                
  9696.                <title><![CDATA[Dashboard + Reports]]></title>
  9697.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/289#msg-289</link>
  9698.                <description><![CDATA[Hi,When We put Report on dashboard using functionality of massive action or quick path not refreshing data in report. When we use it on report it refresh data. The functionality of report when it use as report or report on dashboard should be the same.]]></description>
  9699.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Hubert Chadaj)]]></author>
  9700.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/289#msg-289</guid>
  9701.                <pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2021 21:19:16 +0100</pubDate>
  9702.                            </item>
  9703.                    <item>
  9704.                
  9705.                <title><![CDATA[SharePoint List style dynamic filtering on views]]></title>
  9706.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/288#msg-288</link>
  9707.                <description><![CDATA[Currently, views do not allow dynamic filtering on views for datetime and people-picker fields.It can be done by extending the query in the datasource. The datasource can only be changed by administrators and designers.For end-users it would by great having the possibility to use placeholders for filtering datetime and people-picker fields.  My idea is having placeholders like [now] / [today], which would take the current datetime/date and also [me] for the current user.]]></description>
  9708.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Markus Jenni)]]></author>
  9709.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/288#msg-288</guid>
  9710.                <pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2021 19:27:19 +0100</pubDate>
  9711.                            </item>
  9712.                    <item>
  9713.                
  9714.                <title><![CDATA[OAuth 2.0 Authentication / OpenID for REST - Web service]]></title>
  9715.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/277#msg-279</link>
  9716.                <description><![CDATA[Hi Daniel,thanks for your quick response. I will check, if I can manage it with the anonymous approach. It is a new topic I am working on, so I have still a lot to experience. For such a situation it would be great to have the requested functionality as standard.Nevertheless, I will keep you updated if it works or not.Best regardsThomas]]></description>
  9717.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Thomas Dengler)]]></author>
  9718.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/277#msg-279</guid>
  9719.                <pubDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2021 19:20:11 +0100</pubDate>
  9720.                            </item>
  9721.                    <item>
  9722.                
  9723.                <title><![CDATA[OAuth 2.0 Authentication / OpenID for REST - Web service]]></title>
  9724.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/277#msg-278</link>
  9725.                <description><![CDATA[Hi Thomas,I think this was already answered here and is intended for the next version:https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/146When you need it now than you would have to to execute an anonymous request to fetch the access token and use it in your following requests. It&#039;s a bit cumbersome but it&#039;s possible.Just search for a postman example.Best regards, Daniel]]></description>
  9726.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Daniel Krüger Cosmo Consult)]]></author>
  9727.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/277#msg-278</guid>
  9728.                <pubDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2021 18:21:04 +0100</pubDate>
  9729.                            </item>
  9730.                    <item>
  9731.                
  9732.                <title><![CDATA[OAuth 2.0 Authentication / OpenID for REST - Web service]]></title>
  9733.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/277#msg-277</link>
  9734.                <description><![CDATA[Dear WebCon Team,we most urgently need the possibility to have further authentication methods using OAuth 2.0 / OpenID in the context of REST - Web Service. At the moment the limitation does us not allow to communicate with other systems in the way of microservices.This extension would be a great increase of data communication.Thanks a lotBest regardsThomas]]></description>
  9735.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Thomas Dengler)]]></author>
  9736.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/277#msg-277</guid>
  9737.                <pubDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2021 15:28:38 +0100</pubDate>
  9738.                            </item>
  9739.                    <item>
  9740.                
  9741.                <title><![CDATA[Extending the audit trail to views]]></title>
  9742.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/271#msg-276</link>
  9743.                <description><![CDATA[If you would do this, you would have to store the user, too. In case you need a workaround for your customer you could make use of the IIS logs. You could crawl them with PS and write them to an own database. Than you could add a data table to those workflows where it&#039;s necessary or make a process which accepts a workflow id and displays the relevant data.]]></description>
  9744.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Daniel Krüger Cosmo Consult)]]></author>
  9745.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/271#msg-276</guid>
  9746.                <pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2021 23:42:44 +0100</pubDate>
  9747.                            </item>
  9748.                    <item>
  9749.                
  9750.                <title><![CDATA[Extending the audit trail to views]]></title>
  9751.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/271#msg-271</link>
  9752.                <description><![CDATA[We recently had a presentation of WEBCON BPS for a new customer. They came up with the question if not only changes of an element are being kept in history, but also views.So we need to define the definition, what as to be considered as a view. Sometimes you can tell a lot from what you see on a report already, but keeping track of this would be too much in my opinion.The easiest and most pragmatic way to keep track of views would be opening a preview or of course a form. Maybe also viewing or downloading a file could be recorded.The most luxury version would be configuration options (elements views,  element edits, document downloads, document previews) on process level. By default it would then be switched off.It might be feature other partners/customers would like to have as well.]]></description>
  9753.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Markus Jenni)]]></author>
  9754.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/271#msg-271</guid>
  9755.                <pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2021 15:55:40 +0100</pubDate>
  9756.                            </item>
  9757.                    <item>
  9758.                
  9759.                <title><![CDATA[Usages options for BPS groups]]></title>
  9760.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/268#msg-268</link>
  9761.                <description><![CDATA[It would be great if there would be a &quot;Usages&quot; options for BPS groups like it exists for the most other objects like Rules, Fields, Action Template, Data sources and so on.I&#039;m already using two workaround 1) I created a constant for each bps group so that I can use this constant wherever possible. Unfortunately there are some cases where this is not possible. For example in a &quot;Person or group&quot; field where the picker is limited to a group. 2) I added the &quot;SearchAllTables&quot; stored procedure to look for any occurrence of the BPS_ID of the group.https://ignas.me/tech/searchalltables-sql-stored-procedure/Note for myself:I should add a second stored procedure which only searches through relevant tables.Best regards,Daniel]]></description>
  9762.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Daniel Krüger Cosmo Consult)]]></author>
  9763.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/268#msg-268</guid>
  9764.                <pubDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2021 23:18:45 +0100</pubDate>
  9765.                            </item>
  9766.                    <item>
  9767.                
  9768.                <title><![CDATA[Extending Rest api to allow querying datasources]]></title>
  9769.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/240#msg-247</link>
  9770.                <description><![CDATA[I&#039;m not sure whether this is a good idea. 1. This could degrade the performance if WEBCON BPS is used for data plumbing.2. There are (currently) no security mechanism to secure the data sources. Ok, 2021 added an option to limit data sources to specific applications, but this is something else than protecting them against unwanted access,3. Accessing REST/SOAP data sources would introduce an unnecessary round trip. You could use them directly. Since you are already storing credentials for connecting to the BPS API there&#039;s not much difference in storing the others also.The only benefit would be to access external MSSQL/Oracle databases. If your IDs are based on workflows you could make use of the Report API. Then again I&#039;m all for getting some kind of search API. :)]]></description>
  9771.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Daniel Krüger Cosmo Consult)]]></author>
  9772.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/240#msg-247</guid>
  9773.                <pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2021 22:06:27 +0100</pubDate>
  9774.                            </item>
  9775.                    <item>
  9776.                
  9777.                <title><![CDATA[Extending Rest api to allow querying datasources]]></title>
  9778.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/240#msg-244</link>
  9779.                <description><![CDATA[This would be great! Also relating to the API would be great if we could do some sort of instance search on a certain field(column from wfelements). We are finding quite often the need of returning all the instances that match a certain filed value.]]></description>
  9780.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Razvan Ogrezeanu - ENCORSA Romania)]]></author>
  9781.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/240#msg-244</guid>
  9782.                <pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2021 21:26:55 +0100</pubDate>
  9783.                            </item>
  9784.                    <item>
  9785.                
  9786.                <title><![CDATA[Extending Rest api to allow querying datasources]]></title>
  9787.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/240#msg-240</link>
  9788.                <description><![CDATA[When adding or updating elements via Rest Api, for picker fields it is required to provide Id and name. Quite often the name is known, but not the id. As picker fields are usually based on datasources, it would by great, when the api would be extended with methods to query datasources. There should be at least two methods:1) getting a list of all available datasources (overall / by application)2) query a datasource with a filter. To make it easier, the filter should be passed in as query string]]></description>
  9789.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Markus Jenni)]]></author>
  9790.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/240#msg-240</guid>
  9791.                <pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2021 23:01:10 +0100</pubDate>
  9792.                            </item>
  9793.                    <item>
  9794.                
  9795.                <title><![CDATA[Menuactions requesting parameters]]></title>
  9796.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/228#msg-228</link>
  9797.                <description><![CDATA[On reports we have the great possibility to execute mass actions by passing in some parameters.It would be a great having a similar kind of dialog menu action, where we can configure some informational text (e.g. as header/footer) and of course one or more fields as parameter. The configured parameters we then can use to execute an action. The dialog could contain a cancel and a okay]]></description>
  9798.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Markus Jenni)]]></author>
  9799.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/228#msg-228</guid>
  9800.                <pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2021 01:47:42 +0100</pubDate>
  9801.                            </item>
  9802.                    <item>
  9803.                
  9804.                <title><![CDATA[SOLR Reports - Attachments]]></title>
  9805.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/224#msg-224</link>
  9806.                <description><![CDATA[Hi,When we use reports with SOLR we have easy access to attachment&#039;s, but not always is good to see them all.When elements have many attachments the report is inconvenient and not look good.Where useful will be to set:- how many attachment&#039;s we wont to see- filter them by category or type of fileon seconde side nice to have will be colapsing row to see only one attchment and after expand see more.The all will be very useful to do good reports ;)]]></description>
  9807.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Hubert Chadaj)]]></author>
  9808.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/224#msg-224</guid>
  9809.                <pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2021 23:38:03 +0100</pubDate>
  9810.                            </item>
  9811.                    <item>
  9812.                
  9813.                <title><![CDATA[SDK extension for reports]]></title>
  9814.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/184#msg-221</link>
  9815.                <description><![CDATA[Just came accross the next customer with the requirement of producing more advanced Pdf reports....]]></description>
  9816.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Markus Jenni)]]></author>
  9817.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/184#msg-221</guid>
  9818.                <pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2021 19:23:03 +0100</pubDate>
  9819.                            </item>
  9820.                    <item>
  9821.                
  9822.                <title><![CDATA[&#039;Pre-filtering&#039; My Tasks section]]></title>
  9823.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/207#msg-207</link>
  9824.                <description><![CDATA[Some context - while we bind existing processes in another application, My Task section sums number of tasks from all connected processes. I know that as user i can filter them, but my proposal is to add some option for connected processes to not appering in active tasks section at all :)]]></description>
  9825.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Sebastian Gębuś)]]></author>
  9826.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/207#msg-207</guid>
  9827.                <pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2021 21:19:10 +0100</pubDate>
  9828.                            </item>
  9829.                    <item>
  9830.                
  9831.                <title><![CDATA[A section in this website for common errors/bugs.]]></title>
  9832.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/194#msg-194</link>
  9833.                <description><![CDATA[An errors section where the community can post common errors and possible solutions for them. A search by error message or code would be great. We are building one of those blogs for errors internal, but it would be great if the community can have their input on it. Also the version of WEBCON would be an useful filed to group by.]]></description>
  9834.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Razvan Ogrezeanu - ENCORSA Romania)]]></author>
  9835.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/194#msg-194</guid>
  9836.                <pubDate>Mon, 25 Jan 2021 20:12:55 +0100</pubDate>
  9837.                            </item>
  9838.                    <item>
  9839.                
  9840.                <title><![CDATA[SDK extension for reports]]></title>
  9841.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/184#msg-185</link>
  9842.                <description><![CDATA[That&#039;s an interesting idea and I have another use case /addition. :)We have the option to create a custom UI for specific fields using the FormFieldsExtensionJS. We can also add logic to define how the field is stored but there&#039;s not a lot of options for defining how a field is rendered in a report. We need to save the value in a way which looks good enough to be rendered on the report. Even if we can somehow generate a nice rendering value, we can not filter such a field. The attachment shows an example.It would be nice if an interface would be provided to define how the field should be displayed, which kind of filters are possible and how the select statement for these filters should look like.]]></description>
  9843.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Daniel Krüger Cosmo Consult)]]></author>
  9844.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/184#msg-185</guid>
  9845.                <pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2021 22:59:11 +0100</pubDate>
  9846.                            </item>
  9847.                    <item>
  9848.                
  9849.                <title><![CDATA[SDK extension for reports]]></title>
  9850.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/184#msg-184</link>
  9851.                <description><![CDATA[WEBCON BPS reporting offers great functionality for sorting, filtering.It would great having the option to implement and configure a SDK extension for reports, which would allow to execute an action based on the current selection. In my case the SDK extension would receive the selected rows with all fields and generate an advanced Pdf report. Like configuring the mass action, there should be an option to configure the SDK action. Like picking the right extension, title and maybe an icon.Some functionality that would be required to fullfill the requirements are already there (Export to excel) and there is no need to reinvent the whole architecture of reporting. To generate the excel the api /api/db/1/app/7/report/2/export is called. To call an sdk action it could be something like /api/db/1/app/7/report/2/sdk/{actionId}.]]></description>
  9852.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Markus Jenni)]]></author>
  9853.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/184#msg-184</guid>
  9854.                <pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2021 06:15:43 +0100</pubDate>
  9855.                            </item>
  9856.                    <item>
  9857.                
  9858.                <title><![CDATA[Studio: double click]]></title>
  9859.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/173#msg-173</link>
  9860.                <description><![CDATA[Duble click on any field or action templates in the left panel, could open configuration of that field or action.]]></description>
  9861.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Marcin Lange)]]></author>
  9862.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/173#msg-173</guid>
  9863.                <pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2021 23:09:19 +0100</pubDate>
  9864.                            </item>
  9865.                    <item>
  9866.                
  9867.                <title><![CDATA[2-level grouping and showing available views in report-menu]]></title>
  9868.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/118#msg-155</link>
  9869.                <description><![CDATA[Available in WEBCON BPS 2021]]></description>
  9870.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Pawel Jawien WEBCON)]]></author>
  9871.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/118#msg-155</guid>
  9872.                <pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2021 01:18:22 +0100</pubDate>
  9873.                            </item>
  9874.                    <item>
  9875.                
  9876.                <title><![CDATA[Add possibility to add step column in mass notification]]></title>
  9877.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/139#msg-142</link>
  9878.                <description><![CDATA[The mass notification functionality will be rebuilt in the WEBCON BPS 2021 (soon). There will be an option to define many different types of mass notifications with different templates (user-defined templates) and different conditions (based on business rules).]]></description>
  9879.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Pawel Jawien WEBCON)]]></author>
  9880.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/139#msg-142</guid>
  9881.                <pubDate>Wed, 30 Dec 2020 19:10:37 +0100</pubDate>
  9882.                            </item>
  9883.                    <item>
  9884.                
  9885.                <title><![CDATA[Quick Manual - add it on system dashboard + create Quick Manual element which could be added on custom dashboard]]></title>
  9886.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/127#msg-140</link>
  9887.                <description><![CDATA[Thank you for answer! :)Good idea for Custom Dashboard (e.g. setup as home dashboard). However adding this section to custom dashboard or &quot;out-of-the&quot; box element would be helpful as well :) I mean the quick manual from process configuration (screenshot - ling.png). In that case something like quick manual on Application Level is needed or somehow configure it which one should be shown or all.]]></description>
  9888.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Dominik Cholewinski)]]></author>
  9889.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/127#msg-140</guid>
  9890.                <pubDate>Tue, 22 Dec 2020 21:11:39 +0100</pubDate>
  9891.                            </item>
  9892.                    <item>
  9893.                
  9894.                <title><![CDATA[Add possibility to add step column in mass notification]]></title>
  9895.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/139#msg-139</link>
  9896.                <description><![CDATA[Adding possibility to add SQL row as a column could be also a workaround to achieve that. Right now (BPS 2020...434) is is only possible to add instance number from system fields to mass notifications.]]></description>
  9897.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Dominik Cholewinski)]]></author>
  9898.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/139#msg-139</guid>
  9899.                <pubDate>Tue, 22 Dec 2020 21:04:39 +0100</pubDate>
  9900.                            </item>
  9901.                    <item>
  9902.                
  9903.                <title><![CDATA[Quick Manual - add it on system dashboard + create Quick Manual element which could be added on custom dashboard]]></title>
  9904.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/127#msg-133</link>
  9905.                <description><![CDATA[Hello Dominik!Hope you are well.I think that this is good idea to add link to instructions in app description webpart.But you can achive this by another method: You can prepare document dictionary workflow with instruction files. Then you can prepare report with these instructions files. On the raport you can configure direct link to preview files. Raport with instructions list can be added to dashboard.Another way you can embede HTML code with links to instructions.Edit: And another idea if you want allow users to start process only even they have read the instructions. You can add quick path to dictionary workflow with instruction - &quot;I confirm that I have read instruction&quot; and action on this path - add user to group with start permission for current user. - I have never tried this, but i think that this should work.]]></description>
  9906.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Adrian)]]></author>
  9907.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/127#msg-133</guid>
  9908.                <pubDate>Sat, 19 Dec 2020 01:44:50 +0100</pubDate>
  9909.                            </item>
  9910.                    <item>
  9911.                
  9912.                <title><![CDATA[Quick Manual - add it on system dashboard + create Quick Manual element which could be added on custom dashboard]]></title>
  9913.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/127#msg-127</link>
  9914.                <description><![CDATA[Quick Manual should be entry point, to see quick manual right now user must enter form to start process first. The order shall be the other way: first read manual, later start process.]]></description>
  9915.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Dominik Cholewinski)]]></author>
  9916.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/127#msg-127</guid>
  9917.                <pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2020 20:16:17 +0100</pubDate>
  9918.                            </item>
  9919.                    <item>
  9920.                
  9921.                <title><![CDATA[Add Technical Supervisor for Application and for Process]]></title>
  9922.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/126#msg-126</link>
  9923.                <description><![CDATA[1. Technical Application Supervisor could be shown on system dashboard (if not empty) + could be added as element on custom dashboard2. Technical Process Supervisor could be shown on info panel (if not empty)]]></description>
  9924.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Dominik Cholewinski)]]></author>
  9925.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/126#msg-126</guid>
  9926.                <pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2020 20:14:48 +0100</pubDate>
  9927.                            </item>
  9928.                    <item>
  9929.                
  9930.                <title><![CDATA[Item list: Single row editing improvements]]></title>
  9931.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/123#msg-123</link>
  9932.                <description><![CDATA[I have a few suggestions for improving the single row editing experience:1. Adding a next/previous button to the modal dialog so that you can easily go through the rows.2. No fixed height for modal dialog. The max height of 400px makes it quite hard  use the modal dialog. It would be better if the available space is used. I already added a style overwrite for this.3. If single row editing is used it would be better to display the icon on the left instead of the right side. Depending on the width of the item list the user needs to scroll and if you are unlucky the displayed info panel may hide the icon. Of course, I can&#039;t replicate the later case any more.Off topicIt&#039;s nice to see that the status of some feedback moves on :)Best Regards,Daniel]]></description>
  9933.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Daniel Krüger Cosmo Consult)]]></author>
  9934.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/123#msg-123</guid>
  9935.                <pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2020 00:19:45 +0100</pubDate>
  9936.                            </item>
  9937.                    <item>
  9938.                
  9939.                <title><![CDATA[Improved highlighting of admin changes in histoy]]></title>
  9940.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/122#msg-122</link>
  9941.                <description><![CDATA[There&#039;s currently not an easy way to identify versions which have been created in administration mode. The attached picture shows two changes. Both were done using the admin mode. Unfortunately this is not visible for the second one where the admin added a comment.Maybe a new column could be added or a different colour could be used for versions created in administration mode.]]></description>
  9942.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Daniel Krüger Cosmo Consult)]]></author>
  9943.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/122#msg-122</guid>
  9944.                <pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2020 00:04:48 +0100</pubDate>
  9945.                            </item>
  9946.                    <item>
  9947.                
  9948.                <title><![CDATA[Option to check/verify permissions of another user for Admins]]></title>
  9949.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/121#msg-121</link>
  9950.                <description><![CDATA[It happens that special privileges have to be applied on workflow elements, dashboards or views. Unless we work on a system with different test users, it is quite difficult to check whether a certain user really has access to right artifacts or not. Sometimes i also get support tickets from customers telling they would see or not see artifacts. As an administrator oder system administrator it would be great, that we can simulate a user. Within the simulation mode, we would be able to see what &quot;user A&quot; does. Of course we should not be allowed to execute any action on behalf of this user.]]></description>
  9951.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Markus Jenni)]]></author>
  9952.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/121#msg-121</guid>
  9953.                <pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2020 02:10:19 +0100</pubDate>
  9954.                            </item>
  9955.                    <item>
  9956.                
  9957.                <title><![CDATA[2-level grouping and showing available views in report-menu]]></title>
  9958.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/118#msg-118</link>
  9959.                <description><![CDATA[Currently our report-menu for some processes is getting longer and longer. One reason for that is the fact, that some people have issues understanding they have to choose a report and can then navigate on the other side of the form by the views we have set up for them. Mostly people who count their daily clicks and tell you to change the system if they have to do 10 more a day, because you have set something up the way it makes sense. Hence: instead of discussing they get a report. Anyways...It came to my mind that this problem might be solved by 2 level grouping in the report menu, and the possibility to expand each report-entry to see the available views already in the menu - not only after you opened the report, just like the grouping works in the views. For example if we have a report containing all our invoices and views for &quot;factual check&quot;, &quot;financing check&quot; and &quot;accounting step&quot; plus a report for all our contract based payments and the steps &quot;financing check&quot;, &quot;paid&quot;, &quot;not paid&quot; which use different fields and need to be kept in a different report - it might look like this:+ Invoices     My Tasks (17)     My Invoices (120)     Factual check     Financing check     Accounting+ Contract based payments     My Tasks (3)     My CBP     Financing check     Paid     Not paidand so on. This would really help at not getting a messy menu in the applications. It would be even more awesome if there was an optional number indicating the count of entries in that view (in brackets in the example). I then would use this to replace the standard &quot;My Tasks&quot;- section which i think is a good idea but not of much use, because it&#039;s lacking:a) possibility to fade the &quot;Instance preview cards&quot; out - this bar just uses way too much space that might be missing on the form thenb) a chance to filter for workflows (and maybe other parameters)]]></description>
  9960.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Christian Amler)]]></author>
  9961.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/118#msg-118</guid>
  9962.                <pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2020 18:50:31 +0100</pubDate>
  9963.                            </item>
  9964.                    <item>
  9965.                
  9966.                <title><![CDATA[Add more colours to mark arrows in BPS process design]]></title>
  9967.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/33#msg-116</link>
  9968.                <description><![CDATA[Dear Daniel, thanks for this awesome feedback. I really like it. I still would like to have option for more colours to mark paths, but in terms of simplicity of the processes it&#039;s a good limitation. :)Regards.]]></description>
  9969.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Adam Hatak)]]></author>
  9970.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/33#msg-116</guid>
  9971.                <pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2020 20:43:32 +0100</pubDate>
  9972.                            </item>
  9973.                    <item>
  9974.                
  9975.                <title><![CDATA[Delay HotHolder import of a file]]></title>
  9976.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/115#msg-115</link>
  9977.                <description><![CDATA[Please add feature to define delay (i.e. 60 seconds) before file gets imported from HotFolder. I have a situation where  scanner creates an empty file at beginning of scanning, and WEBCON gets this file before it&#039;s complete.I use script to copy files from &quot;temp scan&quot; folder to HotFolder, but such feature directly in WEBCON BPS could bypass this workaround.Any comments and feedback here is more than welcome :)]]></description>
  9978.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Adam Hatak)]]></author>
  9979.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/115#msg-115</guid>
  9980.                <pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2020 20:40:03 +0100</pubDate>
  9981.                            </item>
  9982.                    <item>
  9983.                
  9984.                <title><![CDATA[BPMN import]]></title>
  9985.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/103#msg-103</link>
  9986.                <description><![CDATA[Dear Webcon.Designer Studio is a great tool, and visual workflow editor is a great tool too, but it&#039;s missing a compliance with visual proces definition standards, like BPMN 2.0.Can you please implement a BPMN import feature ?Sure it won&#039;t be easy (since the differences in process/workflow definitions) but still it should be posiible to implement some basic imports, even if not all data from BPMN diagrams could be imported.BPMN is widely used by organizations for process management and documentation, and possibility for easy implementation of previously designed processes would be a great feature.]]></description>
  9987.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Rafał Kowalewski)]]></author>
  9988.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/103#msg-103</guid>
  9989.                <pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2020 19:38:56 +0100</pubDate>
  9990.                            </item>
  9991.                    <item>
  9992.                
  9993.                <title><![CDATA[Application versions]]></title>
  9994.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/77#msg-99</link>
  9995.                <description><![CDATA[Forget what I&#039;ve written I would be willing to pay for such a feature right now. :)]]></description>
  9996.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Daniel Krüger Cosmo Consult)]]></author>
  9997.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/77#msg-99</guid>
  9998.                <pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2020 18:11:37 +0100</pubDate>
  9999.                            </item>
  10000.                    <item>
  10001.                
  10002.                <title><![CDATA[normal HTML attributes]]></title>
  10003.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/94#msg-97</link>
  10004.                <description><![CDATA[Thanks for the picture, without it I still wouldn&#039;t have guessed what you are talking about. The englisch translation of this object is &#039;field&#039;. You can probably understand my confusion now. I tried to figure out what attributes/properties you are referring. There are some which result in setting html attribute on the form so I was really lost here. :)Even so I know now that you are referring too the new HTML field type. I still don&#039;t get most of what improvements you wish for. Of course, I&#039;m not representing someone from Webcon, but I believe that you have a higher chance of success if you can describe what change you want in detail.As far as I can understand there are four changes you wish for:1. Manipulation of the HTML field with the existing functions without writing java script yourself  I didn&#039;t try it, if i could hide/show the html field depending on some actions. Do you have some other actions in mind?2. Export/ImportI have no idea what you want. 3. Single SQL Field for all (fields)?It&#039;s the same as for the other fields. Each field is represented by a single row in [WFConfigurations] and the configuration of the field in the column [WFCON_Config]      None    #{EGV:16}#    false      4. Improvements to rule editorHere you have already created a user voice. So this would be a duplicate.At least this is what I have guessed from you initial post, if I wrong correct me and be more elaborate about it. So that everyone here understands you. This could result in more thumbs up. ;)]]></description>
  10005.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Daniel Krüger Cosmo Consult)]]></author>
  10006.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/94#msg-97</guid>
  10007.                <pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2020 17:12:51 +0100</pubDate>
  10008.                            </item>
  10009.                    <item>
  10010.                
  10011.                <title><![CDATA[normal HTML attributes]]></title>
  10012.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/94#msg-96</link>
  10013.                <description><![CDATA[Ok, focus please - I&#039;m talking BPS attribute - type HTLM :-)Take a look at the picture (polish version)]]></description>
  10014.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Rafał Kowalewski)]]></author>
  10015.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/94#msg-96</guid>
  10016.                <pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2020 03:54:32 +0100</pubDate>
  10017.                            </item>
  10018.                    <item>
  10019.                
  10020.                <title><![CDATA[normal HTML attributes]]></title>
  10021.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/94#msg-95</link>
  10022.                <description><![CDATA[Hi,I don&#039;t think this will happen. There are about 160 attributes:https://www.w3schools.com/tags/ref_attributes.aspCreating these many columns in numerous tables or creating an other table which maps these attribute values to the object would incur a (unnecessary) performance impact. Could you provide a little bit more context what you try to achieve? Kind regards,Daniel]]></description>
  10023.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Daniel Krüger Cosmo Consult)]]></author>
  10024.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/94#msg-95</guid>
  10025.                <pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2020 05:20:51 +0100</pubDate>
  10026.                            </item>
  10027.                    <item>
  10028.                
  10029.                <title><![CDATA[normal HTML attributes]]></title>
  10030.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/94#msg-94</link>
  10031.                <description><![CDATA[Hi, so HTML attributes are great, but only untill you try to do something with them - like hide for example... or export - importSeems like you keep them all in a single SQL field:-(So, some JS manipulation is needed, rule editor is useless.Can you make normal HTML attributes - every attribute in separate SQL field?]]></description>
  10032.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Rafał Kowalewski)]]></author>
  10033.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/94#msg-94</guid>
  10034.                <pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2020 03:22:52 +0100</pubDate>
  10035.                            </item>
  10036.                    <item>
  10037.                
  10038.                <title><![CDATA[Application versions]]></title>
  10039.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/77#msg-87</link>
  10040.                <description><![CDATA[So - hope Webcon will listen to our voice... :-)]]></description>
  10041.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Rafał Kowalewski)]]></author>
  10042.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/77#msg-87</guid>
  10043.                <pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2020 16:38:37 +0100</pubDate>
  10044.                            </item>
  10045.                    <item>
  10046.                
  10047.                <title><![CDATA[Application versions]]></title>
  10048.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/77#msg-85</link>
  10049.                <description><![CDATA[Ok, based on your previous post I believed it would be used for production and not during development.I my experience I either break something which is immediately visible and I therefore know what I&#039;ve done or I couldn&#039;t tell when the breaking change has been added. Of course, with the previous version I could move back and test it until I found a working version. Even so I would still be lost because I don&#039;t know what actually broke. Maybe I would need to move forward again? I may still need to implement the changes I did before and fix the one thing which broke. Would this version only work for admins would we need to &quot;republish&quot; an old version as a new one? If this would be even possible. There are changes which can not be undone. Even by importing an old version.I agree with you on the documenting changes stuff though. Especially if the process is part of an other system where the code/changes can be tracked in a versioning control. There have been a lot of times where I wished that I could serialize a process to compare a version against one in a version control or production against dev. Even if it would be only in a  complex json/XML format. The other option I would have liked to have to get the actual delta between two versions entries from the history which could be written to a file so it again could be part of a commit. Kind regards,Daniel]]></description>
  10050.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Daniel Krüger Cosmo Consult)]]></author>
  10051.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/77#msg-85</guid>
  10052.                <pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2020 03:22:54 +0100</pubDate>
  10053.                            </item>
  10054.                    <item>
  10055.                
  10056.                <title><![CDATA[Portal improvements]]></title>
  10057.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/76#msg-84</link>
  10058.                <description><![CDATA[Some improvements is all I ask for :-)Sure you don&#039;t fight with Sharepoint, Sharepoint is great, you just wanted to be ready in case there is no on-site sharepoint any more (or something like that...)So, whatever is your plan, replacing Sharepoint is EXACTLY WHAT YOU DO :-)And, you do it really well, portal is fantastic, and my users love it after moving from sharepont.Still, there are some things missing:- user defined left menu- pages, not just dashboards- option to turn off the default dashboardAnd there are some annoying litle things, easy to fix, like:- dashboard HTML element should have some kind of HTML editor, not just a narrow window for code pasting. It&#039;s hard to make any changes without copy/paste to external editor- dashboard text element is too narrow, it should be resizable ! Almost impossible to edit large amount of text, too much scrollingI fully understand your standarisation motto.But please look from different perspective - you just introduced APPLICATIONS not just processes and workflows.And a web application needs some flexibility - simple example, a user manual. User manual for a complicated process can be really long.The only option now is to use a separate dashboard for it.And it makes no sense to have a dashboard for the manual - all you need is a page.Let us have a html page and let us add it to the menu.And we have a fully functional BPS app which can really replace Sharepoint for the same purpose.(and by the way - there is no such word as &quot;dashboard&quot; in polish language... can you change it please...)]]></description>
  10059.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Rafał Kowalewski)]]></author>
  10060.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/76#msg-84</guid>
  10061.                <pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2020 02:16:59 +0100</pubDate>
  10062.                            </item>
  10063.                    <item>
  10064.                
  10065.                <title><![CDATA[Application versions]]></title>
  10066.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/77#msg-83</link>
  10067.                <description><![CDATA[Here is the use case:Now you have to export the app. Sure it&#039;s easy, but takes time. Many, many clicks. And you have to save the file. So, every version needs separate file. You have to manage the files. And importing the file is even more clicks. With varsioning, you just press the back button, when:Your formula stops working after few changesYou change your mindThe browser goes white and nothing worksAlso, versioning would help with documenting the app/process.The same way you guys document the BPS versions and log the changes.I would like to have app/process versions, so I could document app/process changes for the users.Instant change is great, but there is no version controll over it, so with many instant changes made by many admins there is often a mess.]]></description>
  10068.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Rafał Kowalewski)]]></author>
  10069.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/77#msg-83</guid>
  10070.                <pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2020 01:27:49 +0100</pubDate>
  10071.                            </item>
  10072.                    <item>
  10073.                
  10074.                <title><![CDATA[User-Preferences - (additional dictionary like substitutions) automatically create an instance per user]]></title>
  10075.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/78#msg-82</link>
  10076.                <description><![CDATA[I like the idea itself, but I don&#039;t think this would work. I&#039;ve created something like a user profile in the past for specific workflows. One was for a travel request for which a user could define some default values for specific fields and settings like whether an appointment should be created. A user could only create one &quot;user profile&quot; and the process would use these values.This worked just fine, but all fields and explanations are process /use case specific, so we would need multiple dictionaries for all those different usages. Perhaps the easiest way would be to define these user setting dictionary along with the main process. In addition one new application is created where you add these as related and provide the UI for configuration. This works just fine. In your &quot;real&quot; process application you could provide a link to the &quot;user profile application&quot;, just make sure to use the link for production. Of course it would be nice to mark &quot;user dictionaries&quot; and make them accessible from the user icon itself.  Best regards,Daniel]]></description>
  10077.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Daniel Krüger Cosmo Consult)]]></author>
  10078.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/78#msg-82</guid>
  10079.                <pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2020 01:01:03 +0100</pubDate>
  10080.                            </item>
  10081.                    <item>
  10082.                
  10083.                <title><![CDATA[Application versions]]></title>
  10084.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/77#msg-81</link>
  10085.                <description><![CDATA[I don&#039;t see the use case. Before you are introducing something &quot;dangerous&quot; just export the application. If there&#039;s a problem restore it. This isn&#039;t a problem as long as you haven&#039;t introduced a change which would require data to be deleted. But this is would apply to your suggestion, too.If you would have separate systems, or at least databases, for each environment you could rely on the automatically created backups, which are created before importing a process. These are available in the context menu on the process element.Kind regards,Daniel]]></description>
  10086.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Daniel Krüger Cosmo Consult)]]></author>
  10087.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/77#msg-81</guid>
  10088.                <pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2020 00:42:56 +0100</pubDate>
  10089.                            </item>
  10090.                    <item>
  10091.                
  10092.                <title><![CDATA[Portal improvements]]></title>
  10093.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/76#msg-80</link>
  10094.                <description><![CDATA[First of all - we ARE NOT replacing Sharepoint and we are not fighting with Sharepoint! You can still use Sharepoint if you like. Sharepoint is good, Sharepoint is fine, Sharepoint is flexible.Our main motto for a Portal is: &quot;Standardization&quot; that&#039;s why we decided to &quot;freeze&quot; the Portal look. But we listen to our customers and you can expect some improvements in WEBCON BPS Portal every next version. By evolution not revolution.]]></description>
  10095.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Pawel Jawien WEBCON)]]></author>
  10096.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/76#msg-80</guid>
  10097.                <pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2020 16:01:22 +0100</pubDate>
  10098.                            </item>
  10099.                    <item>
  10100.                
  10101.                <title><![CDATA[Encrypted fields]]></title>
  10102.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/75#msg-79</link>
  10103.                <description><![CDATA[Do not expect that option as a standard in WEBCON BPS. We/you/Partner can do it as an SDK plugin. Why? Because is a lot of questions to answer every time any customer wants to implement such an option:1. what is an encryption algorithm (symmetrical/asymmetrical).2. Where encryption keys are stored?3. What kind of encryption keys should we use? Password, individual password, certificate (what kind of certificate), hardware token etc...4. What about the backup/restore procedure?5. Do you want a disaster recovery scenario for encryption.6. Is there a master key? Who stores such a key?7. What about the DEV/TEST/PROD scenario?8. Write your question here ...We have made a few proof of concepts for our customers, but nobody has answered our questions :(It is quite easy to implement as an SDK plugin but with a good project.]]></description>
  10104.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Pawel Jawien WEBCON)]]></author>
  10105.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/75#msg-79</guid>
  10106.                <pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2020 15:52:14 +0100</pubDate>
  10107.                            </item>
  10108.                    <item>
  10109.                
  10110.                <title><![CDATA[User-Preferences - (additional dictionary like substitutions) automatically create an instance per user]]></title>
  10111.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/78#msg-78</link>
  10112.                <description><![CDATA[In many tasks we need the same info from the current user. So it would be nice, the user have to write down this only once. Preferred into an additional and self-configurable dictionary, that&#039;s called via user-icon. In this way the user can run only one instance.]]></description>
  10113.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Daniel Töpel)]]></author>
  10114.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/78#msg-78</guid>
  10115.                <pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2020 07:25:16 +0100</pubDate>
  10116.                            </item>
  10117.                    <item>
  10118.                
  10119.                <title><![CDATA[Application versions]]></title>
  10120.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/77#msg-77</link>
  10121.                <description><![CDATA[Can you please add a simple feature - application (or process) versions ?The idea is to have a &quot;back&quot; button - revert to (any) previous version if something goes wrong.I know - you want us to use DEV/TEST/PROD environment. Sure. But versioning would be a nice feature, really.Two options for you to choose:1. every save is a new version2. save as new version button]]></description>
  10122.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Rafał Kowalewski)]]></author>
  10123.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/77#msg-77</guid>
  10124.                <pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2020 04:25:25 +0100</pubDate>
  10125.                            </item>
  10126.                    <item>
  10127.                
  10128.                <title><![CDATA[Portal improvements]]></title>
  10129.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/76#msg-76</link>
  10130.                <description><![CDATA[Hi,no idea about the future plans for the portal, but you should definitely consider adding some more functions, like:- user defined left menu- pages, not just dashboards - option to turn off the default dashboard- dashboard HTML element should have some kind of HTML editor, not just a narrow window for code pasting. It&#039;s hard to make any changes without copy/paste to external editor- dashboard text element is too narrow, it should be resizable ! Almost impossible to edit large amount of text, too much scrollingIn general - think sharepoint, it&#039;s sharepoint you are replacing after all !You are far, far behind of the sharepoint site functionality. Sure, it&#039;s not the goal to make second sharepoint, but for people transitioning from a sharepoint site to BPS portal it&#039;s a big deal - sharepoint is still more flexible...]]></description>
  10131.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Rafał Kowalewski)]]></author>
  10132.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/76#msg-76</guid>
  10133.                <pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2020 04:19:16 +0100</pubDate>
  10134.                            </item>
  10135.                    <item>
  10136.                
  10137.                <title><![CDATA[Encrypted fields]]></title>
  10138.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/75#msg-75</link>
  10139.                <description><![CDATA[Can you please add an option to encrypt fields, and user configure who can decrypt ?Why ? Becouse, in some business appliactions,  administrators not always should be able to see some confidential information send in BPS forms. Senders should decide.]]></description>
  10140.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Rafał Kowalewski)]]></author>
  10141.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/75#msg-75</guid>
  10142.                <pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2020 04:07:38 +0100</pubDate>
  10143.                            </item>
  10144.                    <item>
  10145.                
  10146.                <title><![CDATA[Code editors]]></title>
  10147.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/74#msg-74</link>
  10148.                <description><![CDATA[Hi,just a simple, easy request - can you please add a usefull code editor to SQL rules, JavaScript rules and HTML fields details ?Sure, one can copy paste the code from external editors, but it takes time, having an embedded editor would be a great feature.]]></description>
  10149.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Rafał Kowalewski)]]></author>
  10150.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/74#msg-74</guid>
  10151.                <pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2020 04:02:26 +0100</pubDate>
  10152.                            </item>
  10153.                    <item>
  10154.                
  10155.                <title><![CDATA[Use GUID identification in HTML Templates]]></title>
  10156.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/73#msg-73</link>
  10157.                <description><![CDATA[In new versions o WebCon BPS using Word templates are now using GUID identifier witch enables using it&#039;s in all environments.But the functionality o Word templates are very simple. It&#039;s now enough flexible for control conditions for hide, show etc. information&#039;s.For example: You can not show header of table, but empty row is always. In HTML you can control this.Adding using GUID in HTML templates give the more flexible possibility to build templates witch information]]></description>
  10158.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Hubert Chadaj)]]></author>
  10159.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/73#msg-73</guid>
  10160.                <pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2020 22:23:41 +0100</pubDate>
  10161.                            </item>
  10162.                    <item>
  10163.                
  10164.                <title><![CDATA[Changes to export of processes]]></title>
  10165.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/72#msg-72</link>
  10166.                <description><![CDATA[Hi,we have the situation, that some globals and dictionaries are shared between applications. If I export an application all other applications, which use the same dictionaries, are exported too. At least I believe that the dictionaries are the case. This applies to the current version 2020.1.3.441.Of course, I can uncheck the unrelated applications, but this is error prone. In my opinion the applications are not related, if they only share elements defined in system settings, data sources or plugins. Examples:- Globals -- constants-- business rules-- form rules fields-- fields- Data source-- Dictionaries-- Templates- SDKsIf the export hits one of these elements no further related elements should be gathered.Best regards,Daniel]]></description>
  10167.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Daniel Krüger Cosmo Consult)]]></author>
  10168.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/72#msg-72</guid>
  10169.                <pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2020 23:59:43 +0100</pubDate>
  10170.                            </item>
  10171.                    <item>
  10172.                
  10173.                <title><![CDATA[Adding expression editor to new BPS Portal coding options]]></title>
  10174.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/71#msg-71</link>
  10175.                <description><![CDATA[Hi, with the introduction of BPS Portal we got a few additional options were we can add &quot;code&quot; and where variables from the expression editor would be useful if not even mandatory.1. Report - SQL Filter, there are a few variables there already 2. Calculated field in Reports and BPS internal view, no option to use existing variables3. Report - advanced formatting, no options to use existing variablesWhy do I think that this would be mandatory?The path example of advanced colouring will just break on transporting the report to another environment: https://community.webcon.com/community.webcon.com/public/posts/post/advanced-cell-coloring-in-reports/18This is just a simple example and I have more in mind.While I can workaround for some variables by writing a SQL in 1 and 2, I have no chance for 3.I, for my part, would like to have the yellow highlighted variables in the attachment. For example I currently don&#039;t have a chance to get the current user language which would be required for my workaround here.https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/45/15Best regards,Daniel]]></description>
  10176.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Daniel Krüger Cosmo Consult)]]></author>
  10177.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/71#msg-71</guid>
  10178.                <pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2020 23:41:35 +0100</pubDate>
  10179.                            </item>
  10180.                    <item>
  10181.                
  10182.                <title><![CDATA[Additonal styling capabilities for paths and theme]]></title>
  10183.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/41#msg-70</link>
  10184.                <description><![CDATA[I&#039;m not sure whether I should reply to this thread or create a new User Voice. We have seen the usage of styles in this thread and in addition in this one. https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/45/15In my opinion we need not a fixed number of styles in the themes editor but an option to load an additional stylesheet file. This could be similar to the theme logo option. This style would be loaded on each page so it would be available on dashboard, reports and forms. We have seen that we can achieve a lot with the current options but there would be more benefits to it:- Single point of failure- Same styling across every report/process where the classes are used - Reduced configuration and human errors.- Reduced load on client/server wherever the conditional formatting is executedBest regards,Daniel]]></description>
  10185.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Daniel Krüger Cosmo Consult)]]></author>
  10186.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/41#msg-70</guid>
  10187.                <pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2020 21:12:00 +0100</pubDate>
  10188.                            </item>
  10189.                    <item>
  10190.                
  10191.                <title><![CDATA[Improvements to indicator (traffic light) icon]]></title>
  10192.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/45#msg-69</link>
  10193.                <description><![CDATA[I finally took the time to play around with the advanced formatting options. Using these and applying the styling options from this threadhttps://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/41/15I got a nice uniform solution for reports and data tables. ____Form____--Calculated field in BPS internal data view (case when WFD_IsFinish = 1 then &#039;&#039;....end)--Styling:.finished-Icon::before{content:&quot;\E73E&quot;;/* CheckMark icon*/font-size:large;font-weight:bold;color:green;}____Report____Calculated field returns the icon class from https://uifabricicons.azurewebsites.net/{    &quot;$schema&quot;: &quot;http://developer.webcon.com/json-schemas/v1/column-formatting.schema.json&quot;,    &quot;children&quot;: [        {            &quot;element&quot;: &quot;span&quot;,            &quot;content&quot;: &quot; &quot;,            &quot;attributes&quot;: {                &quot;iconName&quot;: &quot;=CurrentField&quot;,                &quot;title&quot;: &quot;=if(CurrentField==&#039;Warning&#039;,&#039;Overdue&#039;,if(CurrentField==&#039;AlarmClock&#039;,&#039;Due in less than two days&#039;,if(CurrentField==&#039;BufferTimeAfter&#039;,&#039;Due in less than ten days.&#039;,if(CurrentField==&#039;DateTime2&#039;,&#039;More than ten days until due.&#039;,&#039;Completed&#039;))))&quot;            },            &quot;style&quot;: {                &quot;color&quot;: &quot;=if(CurrentField==&#039;Warning&#039;,&#039;red&#039;,if(CurrentField==&#039;AlarmClock&#039;,&#039;orange&#039;,if(CurrentField==&#039;BufferTimeAfter&#039;,&#039;orange&#039;,if(CurrentField==&#039;DateTime2&#039;,&#039;blue&#039;,&#039;green&#039;))))&quot;,                &quot;font-size&quot;: &quot;large&quot;,                &quot;font-weight&quot;: &quot;bold&quot;,                &quot;white-space&quot;: &quot;pre&quot;            }        },        {            &quot;element&quot;: &quot;span&quot;,            &quot;content&quot;: &quot;  &quot;,            &quot;attributes&quot;: {                &quot;title&quot;: &quot;=if(CurrentField==&#039;Warning&#039;,&#039;Overdue&#039;,if(CurrentField==&#039;AlarmClock&#039;,&#039;Due in less than two days&#039;,if(CurrentField==&#039;BufferTimeAfter&#039;,&#039;Due in less than ten days.&#039;,if(CurrentField==&#039;DateTime2&#039;,&#039;More than ten days until due.&#039;,&#039;Completed&#039;))))&quot;            },            &quot;style&quot;: {                &quot;white-space&quot;: &quot;pre&quot;            }        }    ]}-- Remark 1The referenced fabric ui site contains more icons than are available. We can not use DateTime12 for example.-- Remark 2iconName will generate an html element like thisBecause of title=&quot;&quot; in this element the title of the parent element is not displayed on mouse over. Therefore I surrounded the i tag with spaces to display the tooltip, if the mouse is a little bit outside the icon itself.Creating a multilingual tooltip in the report will get even uglier. Since we don&#039;t have the language we would need to multiply the if conditions for each additional language. if(Icon1-EN, english Text, if(Icon1-DE,german text ...While it&#039;s great to have these options and it was an interesting experiment I still believe, that the initial suggestions for the indicator would make life a lot easier. Even if we would be limited two three colours:)]]></description>
  10194.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Daniel Krüger Cosmo Consult)]]></author>
  10195.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/45#msg-69</guid>
  10196.                <pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2020 06:27:59 +0100</pubDate>
  10197.                            </item>
  10198.                    <item>
  10199.                
  10200.                <title><![CDATA[Tasks process improvements]]></title>
  10201.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/43#msg-68</link>
  10202.                <description><![CDATA[Hi Pawel, hi Adrian,i am more with what Pawel suggested in terms of notfications. One of the main reasons we introduced webcon was saving the accountants time from having to write angry E-mails.Of course users with a lot of tasks get used to the portal, and have a look in there every day. But we also have people who are approving 3 invoices a year, hence they wont look into the portal frequently. They will rather have 1 instant notification, and perhaps a weekly reminder with a list of tasks (if they have any). People with daily routines in the system rather would avoid getting an email for every task, because they look into the portal frequently anyways. We started with the built in mass notification, but there are no parameters to keep it from useless and annoying spamming, e.g. on weekends, during vacation with substitution rule inserted and so on. Soon I got complaints about people having 30 messages after their vacation or getting woke up on sundays at 6 in the morning by their company cellphones next to the bed (to name just a few). If you want to burn the earth for a new system, this is how you do it best. As i want our people to accept the system and love working with it, I invested a lot of time in a notification workflow that is triggered by cyclical actions for just our invoice approval process. It is nice and good as it is, but also works for only one process. Things get really, really messy when you have to deal with different languages, with the same people approving invoices for different companies, which also have different accountants which you need to impersonate to send out the notifications, to make sure questions will be directed to the right person. The good thing is that i have complete track of which user having being notified about what, so there is no escape from your tasks, and no one can say &quot;i didn&#039;t know&quot;.I agree that organizational culture has to follow the system to some extent, but not completely. And also i agree: if you spam someone 3 times and he ignores it, there is no need to spam him further - spamming supervisors usually is the way forward then. What we want to avoid is having to employ more angry accountants.I really like the idea of having notification templates a lot, perhaps with one that the admins define as standard per process and workflow - but also with options in the users own profile, where he can switch notifications on or off, or choose a different medium for example. Maybe something like a notification-subscription-setup for every process the user has access to.Just my 2 cents.Take good care and stay healthy all!Chris]]></description>
  10203.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Christian Amler)]]></author>
  10204.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/43#msg-68</guid>
  10205.                <pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2020 22:34:42 +0100</pubDate>
  10206.                            </item>
  10207.                    <item>
  10208.                
  10209.                <title><![CDATA[Additonal styling capabilities for paths and theme]]></title>
  10210.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/41#msg-60</link>
  10211.                <description><![CDATA[Thanks for this approach! That&#039;s indeed a good solution with the existing toolset.]]></description>
  10212.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Markus Jenni)]]></author>
  10213.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/41#msg-60</guid>
  10214.                <pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2020 01:17:50 +0100</pubDate>
  10215.                            </item>
  10216.                    <item>
  10217.                
  10218.                <title><![CDATA[Tasks process improvements]]></title>
  10219.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/43#msg-58</link>
  10220.                <description><![CDATA[Hi Pawel!I am sure that most of your requested ideas you can implement by configure cyclical actions which have implemented in BPS many versions ago...There is mass email notification configuration as well, but im my opinion configuration is pure. I used it only in &quot;one-time wrkflows&quot; - enabled it a few days before deadline for all task in this workflow to notify users evry day with summary list of taks in proccess that have to be closed.But in my private opinion... you can enable 10000 email notification, reminders evry day, escalation to supervisor, to Branch president etc. but it wont do anything... email from angry accountant waiting for your task from BPS is 10000% more effective that any automatic reminder :). Organisational culture matters more. From my perspective I dont need any email notification, because you can check actual task list in BPS anytime you want.]]></description>
  10221.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Adrian)]]></author>
  10222.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/43#msg-58</guid>
  10223.                <pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2020 23:49:56 +0100</pubDate>
  10224.                            </item>
  10225.                    <item>
  10226.                
  10227.                <title><![CDATA[Improvements to indicator (traffic light) icon]]></title>
  10228.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/45#msg-56</link>
  10229.                <description><![CDATA[I haven&#039;t used this option yet but will test it once I find some time. The only problem would be that, you would have different symbols in reports and data tables which would get confusing.]]></description>
  10230.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Daniel Krüger Cosmo Consult)]]></author>
  10231.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/45#msg-56</guid>
  10232.                <pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2020 23:06:22 +0100</pubDate>
  10233.                            </item>
  10234.                    <item>
  10235.                
  10236.                <title><![CDATA[Designer: On new step creation a path is added]]></title>
  10237.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/36#msg-55</link>
  10238.                <description><![CDATA[That would be nice too. :)]]></description>
  10239.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Daniel Krüger Cosmo Consult)]]></author>
  10240.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/36#msg-55</guid>
  10241.                <pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2020 23:04:21 +0100</pubDate>
  10242.                            </item>
  10243.                    <item>
  10244.                
  10245.                <title><![CDATA[Distinguish Substitution and Delegation in info panel + Rights to create substitution rules for other users]]></title>
  10246.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/53#msg-53</link>
  10247.                <description><![CDATA[1.) Delegated tasks or tasks received because of substitution rules are always shown as &quot;Substitution&quot;. This confuses people sometimes, because they then might think they will receive all of the delegators tasks. It would be better to show delegated tasks as Delegated.2.) Since we updated to Version 2019 and 2020 we lost the functionality for users to create substitutions for other colleagues. They can open the form, but cant choose anyone properly in the person fields then as Substitute. The option was there with the sharepoint substitution webpart in earlier versions, but now only Admins can create substitution entries for other people. It would be good if the option would be given to business administrators for example, or even everyone. If there is an option to change this already please let me know! :)Thanks for all your hard work, we really love Webcon!]]></description>
  10248.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Christian Amler)]]></author>
  10249.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/53#msg-53</guid>
  10250.                <pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2020 21:13:04 +0100</pubDate>
  10251.                            </item>
  10252.                    <item>
  10253.                
  10254.                <title><![CDATA[Designer: On new step creation a path is added]]></title>
  10255.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/36#msg-52</link>
  10256.                <description><![CDATA[My one, similar to yours, is a button which will create a new step, directly from the step configuration window. Now I have to go back, to workflow definition - it&#039;s too much clicking for me ;-)]]></description>
  10257.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Paweł Drab WEBCON)]]></author>
  10258.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/36#msg-52</guid>
  10259.                <pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2020 00:12:21 +0100</pubDate>
  10260.                            </item>
  10261.                    <item>
  10262.                
  10263.                <title><![CDATA[Improvements to indicator (traffic light) icon]]></title>
  10264.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/45#msg-51</link>
  10265.                <description><![CDATA[Dear Daniel, great idea and clever workaround - as always :-) Thank you for that!Instead of the indicator icons, you can use UI Fabric ones: https://community.webcon.com/community.webcon.com/public/posts/post/advanced-cell-coloring-in-reports/18SQL query used in traffic lights customization is more flexible than report icons. UI Fabric can be used only for simple filters, the ones based on variables:- DET  process- STP  step- DOCTYPE  form type- SUBDOCTYPE  sub-type form- WF  workflow]]></description>
  10266.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Paweł Drab WEBCON)]]></author>
  10267.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/45#msg-51</guid>
  10268.                <pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2020 00:06:52 +0100</pubDate>
  10269.                            </item>
  10270.                    <item>
  10271.                
  10272.                <title><![CDATA[Add more colours to mark arrows in BPS process design]]></title>
  10273.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/33#msg-47</link>
  10274.                <description><![CDATA[I had some time to think about this and it would be interesting to know how many colours are really needed.One of the great parts of Webcon BPS is that it&#039;s intuitive. After you learned the basics you can take on any role in any process. Keeping this in mind I wonder how many colours are actually useful. They need to convey the same meaning in all processes. I don&#039;t think that you want to place a legend in your process to explain which colours are there and why they have been used.The colour red and green are self explaining, so we have currently two colours left which usage the user can memorize. With each added colour it will get harder for the user as well as for the designer. He must have a cheat sheet when to use which colour. Because of these reasons it would be interesting to know how everyone here uses the existing colours and for which cases he needs more colours. After we have a few opinions it may be easier for Webcon to decide whether there will be any changes to the path colours and if this suggestion (adding path styles to themes)  https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/41/15 will be incorporated into the change.This is how I use the path colours in the workflow designer:- Red path: Negative response, going backward in the workflow or leading to the negative final step- Green path: Positive response, going forward in the workflow, final positive step is included here, or &quot;reactivating&quot;  the workflow- Blue path: Looping (save), the step is not left- Grey path: Everything elseThe path buttons are styled accordingly.In addition I have the following use cases where I apply a colour to the path button:- Orange: Paths which are only available in dev, mostly used for easier testing like a &#039;Back&#039; path.- Pink: Paths only visible in administration modeYes, I use colours which are not available in the workflow designer. But these paths are not available for a normal user, so they don&#039;t need to remember the meaning of these colours. :)Are there more use cases for colours which can be applied across all workflows?]]></description>
  10275.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Daniel Krüger Cosmo Consult)]]></author>
  10276.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/33#msg-47</guid>
  10277.                <pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2020 05:33:45 +0100</pubDate>
  10278.                            </item>
  10279.                    <item>
  10280.                
  10281.                <title><![CDATA[Improvements to indicator (traffic light) icon]]></title>
  10282.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/45#msg-45</link>
  10283.                <description><![CDATA[During a presentation there was a comment that the indicator (traffic light) icons are not easily distinguishable for colour blind people. It would be an improvement if the icons would have a different shape in addition to the colour. One idea would be a red square, orange triangle and green circle.In addition there was the question if it would be possible to provide a tooltip what each icon indicates. I&#039;ve currently added an explanation above a data table but this won&#039;t help in a report. Therefore it would be good if we could provide an explanation in addition to the indicator value. While I&#039;m wishing, supporting multiple language would be good too. :)Idea of calculated field defintion in a report / BPS internal view(case when WFD_IsFinish = 1 then &#039;2#Is finished$$DE$$Abgeschlossen&#039;when DATEADD(DAY,-2, WFD_AttDateTime1) &lt; GetDate() then &#039;0#Less than two days until due or overdue$$DE$$Weniger als zwei Tage bis Flligkeit oder berfllig .&#039;when DATEADD(DAY,-10, WFD_AttDateTime1) &lt; GetDate() then &#039;1#Less than 10 days until due$$DE$$Weniger als 10 Tage bis Flligkeit.&#039;else &#039;2#Due in more than 10 days$$DE$$Fllig in mehr als 10 tagen.&#039;end)]]></description>
  10284.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Daniel Krüger Cosmo Consult)]]></author>
  10285.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/45#msg-45</guid>
  10286.                <pubDate>Sat, 24 Oct 2020 00:26:54 +0200</pubDate>
  10287.                            </item>
  10288.                    <item>
  10289.                
  10290.                <title><![CDATA[Additonal styling capabilities for paths and theme]]></title>
  10291.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/41#msg-44</link>
  10292.                <description><![CDATA[I haven&#039;t used the html field before but I doubt I would have injected css. That&#039;s really a great idea and it I tested if it could solve our problem. I want to style my path to and don&#039;t want to have multiple places where I have to change something.Having classes would be fine, but the current options are sufficient. :)The button style value must be a valid style value. This is unfortunate in our case, but we can live with it. Instead of a meaningful word will just to note down that xxx matches &quot;greenPathButtonStyle&quot;The following numbers refer to the numbers in the attachment1.  Define a background colour which identifies the &quot;greenPathButtons&quot;2. Create a global constant in which you define the styles. You can select the correct html element by using attribute selectors. Just make sure, that you use the exact phrasing for the style value  input[class*=&quot;pathPanelButton&quot;][style=&quot;background-color: rgb(12, 12, 12);&quot;] { xxx}3. Reuse the global constant in the html field4. Shows the html of the generated path and the arrows the values matching the attribute selectors.5. Shows that the style defined by 2 is applied to the path.Thanks again for the idea for using html fields. I prefer this approach before defining a fixed number of options in the themes.]]></description>
  10293.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Daniel Krüger Cosmo Consult)]]></author>
  10294.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/41#msg-44</guid>
  10295.                <pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2020 23:29:23 +0200</pubDate>
  10296.                            </item>
  10297.                    <item>
  10298.                
  10299.                <title><![CDATA[Tasks process improvements]]></title>
  10300.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/43#msg-43</link>
  10301.                <description><![CDATA[Hi guys,I&#039;ve I some suggestions for the task management process :1. Add reminders configuration for tasks* possibility to define reminder templates:list of reminders: WHO, WHEN, MESSAGE, channel (email, sms, other ?)* you can attach reminder templates to each type of tasks (workflow steps)2. Add escalation configuration for tasks* possibility to define escalation actions. Good to define escalation templates, list of: WHEN, WHO (roles, managers), MESSAGE, CHANNELyou can attach escalation to each type of tasks3. Tasks process developmentWEBCON tasks workflow is very simple. Do it ... done. I think it needs to move to next level. At least: 1. DOOIT (WHO, WHEN, reminders, escalations), WHO APPROVE, WHO TO INFORM (after approval)to be continued ...Pawe]]></description>
  10302.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Paweł Hołdak)]]></author>
  10303.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/43#msg-43</guid>
  10304.                <pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2020 20:30:57 +0200</pubDate>
  10305.                            </item>
  10306.                    <item>
  10307.                
  10308.                <title><![CDATA[Additonal styling capabilities for paths and theme]]></title>
  10309.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/41#msg-41</link>
  10310.                <description><![CDATA[Designer Studio gives the possibility to apply additional button styles. Adding the possibiltiy to define additional class attributes on the path properties would make the styling easier.The custom styles could be defined in the new html-field (for every process we would have to define it again) or much better, let it define in the themes editor!Update 06.04.2021Apparently is now in back-loghttps://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/404/15]]></description>
  10311.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Markus Jenni)]]></author>
  10312.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/41#msg-41</guid>
  10313.                <pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2020 22:57:15 +0200</pubDate>
  10314.                            </item>
  10315.                    <item>
  10316.                
  10317.                <title><![CDATA[Exporting more than 1000 Rows from SQL-Grid]]></title>
  10318.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/40#msg-40</link>
  10319.                <description><![CDATA[We have a use-case, where people need to export data from an SQL-Grid to Excel for data-verification.Unfortunately the export to excel only allows exporting the header + 999 rows of data - At least i couldn&#039;t find a way to raise the limit.It would be very helpful to get a parameter for a variable maximum row count for the Export in the SQL-grid configuration.Thanks!]]></description>
  10320.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Christian Amler)]]></author>
  10321.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/40#msg-40</guid>
  10322.                <pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2020 21:56:01 +0200</pubDate>
  10323.                            </item>
  10324.                    <item>
  10325.                
  10326.                <title><![CDATA[Document entry points - add choose]]></title>
  10327.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/39#msg-39</link>
  10328.                <description><![CDATA[When User have permission to more then one entry point, the print action get first of it.User should be able to choose on witch point hi what to use.]]></description>
  10329.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Hubert Chadaj)]]></author>
  10330.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/39#msg-39</guid>
  10331.                <pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2020 21:42:27 +0200</pubDate>
  10332.                            </item>
  10333.                    <item>
  10334.                
  10335.                <title><![CDATA[Add more colours to mark arrows in BPS process design]]></title>
  10336.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/33#msg-38</link>
  10337.                <description><![CDATA[Indeed more colors would make things better in terms of visualizing and organizing your flows!]]></description>
  10338.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Razvan Ogrezeanu - ENCORSA Romania)]]></author>
  10339.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/33#msg-38</guid>
  10340.                <pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2020 00:46:49 +0200</pubDate>
  10341.                            </item>
  10342.                    <item>
  10343.                
  10344.                <title><![CDATA[Designer: On new step creation a path is added]]></title>
  10345.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/36#msg-36</link>
  10346.                <description><![CDATA[Whenever I create a new step in the designer studio, I need to add a path too. The only steps which don&#039;t need at least one path are the final paths, which may have already been created by the wizard. So it would save a little bit of time for everyone if there would already be a path. :)Daniel]]></description>
  10347.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Daniel Krüger Cosmo Consult)]]></author>
  10348.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/36#msg-36</guid>
  10349.                <pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2020 22:23:34 +0200</pubDate>
  10350.                            </item>
  10351.                    <item>
  10352.                
  10353.                <title><![CDATA[[Done] Option to place field name above picture field]]></title>
  10354.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/35#msg-35</link>
  10355.                <description><![CDATA[It would be great if an option would be added to place the field name above the picture field, like it is available for the &#039;multiple lines of text&#039; field. The attached picture shows an ugly mockup of the result.Most pictures I have seen are rectangular instead of square, so the default value would be above.Implemented with 2021.1.3.163Thanks,Daniel]]></description>
  10356.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Daniel Krüger Cosmo Consult)]]></author>
  10357.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/35#msg-35</guid>
  10358.                <pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2020 22:19:07 +0200</pubDate>
  10359.                            </item>
  10360.                    <item>
  10361.                
  10362.                <title><![CDATA[Add more colours to mark arrows in BPS process design]]></title>
  10363.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/33#msg-34</link>
  10364.                <description><![CDATA[While I&#039;m fine with the available colours. I agree that the colour of the path in the designer should match the colour of the path buttons, like in the attached image. Of course there may be cases where it differs, even so I can not think of one.Currently I have selected some colours whose text value I have to copy for each path. It would be great if we could use a rule or constant as a button style so that we can have a single place were this style is defined. Currently we would need to go to each path if there&#039;s a need to change the colour slightly. Another option would be to add a four default definition to the Portal theme. One for each available path colour in the designer. If no button style is defined for the path in the designer the theme definitions would apply.]]></description>
  10365.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Daniel Krüger Cosmo Consult)]]></author>
  10366.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/33#msg-34</guid>
  10367.                <pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2020 22:01:45 +0200</pubDate>
  10368.                            </item>
  10369.                    <item>
  10370.                
  10371.                <title><![CDATA[Add more colours to mark arrows in BPS process design]]></title>
  10372.                <link>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/33#msg-33</link>
  10373.                <description><![CDATA[If possible, please add more colours to mark arrows in process design. It&#039;s very useful to mark arrows with same colour as buttons (paths). Currently there are grey (default), green, red, blue.Thanks.]]></description>
  10374.                <author><![CDATA[office@webcon.com (Adam Hatak)]]></author>
  10375.                <guid>https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/33#msg-33</guid>
  10376.                <pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2020 19:07:00 +0200</pubDate>
  10377.                            </item>
  10378.            </channel>
  10379. </rss>
  10380.  

If you would like to create a banner that links to this page (i.e. this validation result), do the following:

  1. Download the "valid RSS" banner.

  2. Upload the image to your own server. (This step is important. Please do not link directly to the image on this server.)

  3. Add this HTML to your page (change the image src attribute if necessary):

If you would like to create a text link instead, here is the URL you can use:

http://www.rssboard.org/rss-validator/check.cgi?url=https%3A//community.webcon.com/feed/user-voice

Software created by Sam Ruby, Mark Pilgrim, Joseph Walton and Phil Ringnalda